Former Secret Service agent describes JFK assassination in new detail
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2023
- For the first time, former Secret Service agent Paul Landis is describing what he saw when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and claims he's the person who found the "magic bullet" that is the mystery at the root of many conspiracy theories surrounding the president's death. He shares his story with NBC's Gadi Schwartz.
» Subscribe to NBC News: nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
» Watch more NBC video: bit.ly/MoreNBCNews
NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: smart.link/5d0cd9df61b80
Breaking News Alerts: link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre...
Visit NBCNews.Com: nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Get more of NBC News delivered to your inbox: nbcnews.com/newsletters
#SecretService #JFK #Assassination
The one thing we can take away from this is that a lot of law enforcement officials destroyed this murder investigation.
No...The WC got it right...law enforcement was more lax in those days.
Congress, man. Gerald Ford ended up being president Gerald Ford right?
Nope. I've researched this for years. It was a different time in 1963. Yes, today this would have been handled different but there is no doubt that the Warren Report was 100 percent right
I believe they are all connected!
Evil and dishonest!
Yes, but on purpose.
if you want to stop crime scene tampering why do you remove a bullet from the car and then surreptitiously put it on a stretcher without explanation. maybe it's true, and maybe he didn't have a bad intention. But bad decision.
Exactly right. It makes so little sense. And how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet for two generations of public debate on such a serious subject. No excuse for that.
@@calva221 "how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet"
-------------------------------------------------------------------
It's entirely possible, given that the assassination was totally unexpected, the hospital scene was chaotic and disorderly, and given his age at the time.
@@kenthompson5723 He wasn't a child with no brain then! 28 is a full-brain developed adult. Interesting, the Founders mandated a Representative must be at least 25, exactly where psychologists say a person's brain is then fully developed and not the 21 (old) age for voting, but since 1971, only 18. Which was a cruel mistake just because men were drafted into the illegal Vietnam War at that same age, so people thought, if a man can be drafted, why can't he vote at that age? It was known then people don't have a full functioning brain developed until their 20s, so the 21 at least seemed reasonable, and far better than only as a teenager of 18! 30 is the minimum for a Senator, and 35 for the President.
@@freeguy77There should be a maximum rather than a minimum ! 75 and you retire as a politician or a judge .
More than bad...he would have been in deep trouble if found out!
It wasn't an Assassination, it was a Coup.
Yes it was a COUP, but it was not possible without the murder (assassination) of John Kennedy.
So true
@@pavelusa3423 So false.
There was no "coup." That's an overly dramatic and inaccurate term to use here. It was a smooth transition of power as provided by the Constitution, from President to Vice President.
@@stddisclaimer8020 He is saying that the government killed the president.
Old guy is just repeating the government message. Obviously still very scared.
Grand-kids need to get into college.
That old guy is the agent that jumped onto the back of the limo after Kennedy was shot.
Totally. Bizarre they still trot this stuff out. It was a coup d’état conducted by the CIA.
I count FIVE shots. One MISS, which caused concrete fragments to hit James Tague, one THROAT shot through the front windshield, one BACK shot which did not penetrate, a shot that hit Connelly and caused all of the damage to his body, and of course the Kennedy Head shot, which I believe originated from the front. That's five shots and that means that a conspiracy was in play that day.
You forgot the bullet that bystanders found near the manhole cover across from the GK. The bullet had dug a lengthy furrow through the grass as was pointed out by a woman bystander as seen in a photo taken. A followup photo is of a lanky man in a business suit putting the bullet in his pant pocket.
I agree, the final fatal shot was probably from the front, from the area behind the fence. A reasonable assumption would be Oswald's' first shot went wild and chipped the curb. The second, might have hit the president's neck, and left a small exit wound, see recent interview with the young doctor who was standing facing Kennedy on the exam table. The third hit Connally, going through bone, and would have been in bad shape. The two mushroom bullet fragments on the back seat came from where? Were these from Connally and picked up and placed on the rear seat? My question is the Carcano rifle has a 4-round magazine, only 3 rounds appear to have been fired. Why didn't Oswald, or the shooter fire a 4th shot? Audio witnesses tend to confirm the last 2 shots came close together, indicating multiple shooters. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots to mask the sound of another shooter(s), possibly from the front? Did this pristine bullet he mention fall out from Kennedy's neck or was it placed there in the confusion during the ride to the hospital.? Lots of questions here.
I count many speculative, uninformed opinions, by people like you...stick to the facts, OK?
Agree. 5 or 6
Most witnesses heard 3 shots.
Windshield is still in the national archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside.
It's completely implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
"Rolled from the gurney to the other" - yes, the magic bullet AGAIN does magic.
That was one of the darkest, saddest days in my life! I was 17 years old and a senior in High School!
mom was at high school to and she and other students started to cry.
Same here. I remember it well.
@@climeaware4814everyone was crying.
My mom went to a Catholic school and everyone cried. My dad said thought the Russians did it and was scared for nuclear war.
@@davidmitnick868 what's really sadder, our own government was involved, the same ones going after President Trump2024🇺🇲🦅❤️
Too much evidence was lost, destroyed, and ignored in this case for me to accept the official explanation. This just adds another layer of confusion.
@user-ij6vg8xq2r And all the alleged "evidence" whether lost or found, still doesn't amount to a hill of beans in terms of a conspiracy.
Something doesn't smell right here...Landis was a trained Secret Service agent who knew better than to sheepishly slip such important evidence on to a stretcher...He would have given it to his supervisor and explained where he found it...I not only find this totally unbelievable but also find his saying he never heard or saw anything about the assassination or that bullet over the last 60 years to be laughable...Landis could have been charged with obstructing the investigation and failing to perform his duties and suffered serious consequences, so it just isn't believable that he would handle such evidence that way or no one would see him dropping that bullet on the stretcher...What rotten journalism the NBC host practices by failing to register that once Landis disproves the Magic Bullet that therefore Landis' claim that the 3 shells prove Oswald did it is invalid because the scenario now requires a 4th bullet...
This 100% correct!
There's NO magic bullet.
What is more unbelievable - an agent grabbing a bullet under shock and duress and putting it with the President, or an agent scrubbing the crime scene with a bucket of water within 10 minutes? Well, we know the latter definitely occurred. The point is that logic did not carry the day that day. He may be telling the truth.
I agree. One has to ask why now and why such an outlandish story given all the research that's been done. It would be much more interesting to find out what he's being paid, who he's scared of...Oliver Stone will figure it out.
Where are you getting the idea he never heard or saw anything about the assassination? He never said or implies that at all. In fact he says that exact opposite. He said was he intentionally avoiding reading about it. Meaning he absolutely did see stuff about it. He just refused to read what he saw.
This guy is admitting to tampering with evidence and deciding what Jackie should or should not see. Sheer incompetence.
It also shocks me that so many involved have never read the Warren Commision Report, or studied any information available.
I agree andymark949. ua-cam.com/video/DC8tO16xdrY/v-deo.html
The clip ends with him saying he believes in the lone gunman theory, what!? What was the point of that!?
He still loves his life.
He’s just stating he believes the facts in the case. He heard 3 shots and 3 cartridges were found on the 6th floor by the open window. Also, workers on the floor below testified that they not only heard 3 shots, but they heard the cartridges hit the floor directly above them.
@@dickhsv He heard 2 shots and Clint Hill heard also only 2 shots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They did not hear the loudest!!!!!!!!!! ADRENALINE
The Secret Service was probably part of the conspiracy that day. When the motorcade left Love Field, one of their men was ordered off the back of JFK's limo. He can be seen, in a video, raising his arms in consternation about the unexplained decision to remove him from the standing post on the rear bumper. Also, there were supposed to be motorcycle cops riding alongside JFK on both sides of the limo,, as part of his protection. When questioned about why those officers weren't there, some Secret Service guy said JFK had asked those officers not be there so people would have a better chance to see him. But the Secret Service later admitted that JFK's attitude toward their protection strategies was always to agree with whatever security formation they wanted. So they were lying.
You said it correctly as I have also repeated in exposing the Kennedy-hating liars! What you said about JFKs protection in previous motorcades is the truth, contrasted to the deliberately stripped-down protection on Nov. 22, contrasted to Mon. Nov. 18 in Tampa, FL. Only four days later, no motorcycle cops OR S.S. agents on the vulnerable right side where JFK sat. Only motorcycle cops FAR BACK from the limo on the left side! And the S.S. car should have been leading the limo (not trailing it), so it could deliberately slow down to stay close to the limo, but not allowing it to go slower than the legal 11mph for the president at all times. In trailing, it allows the driver (William Greer) to pull too far ahead, as was the case in Dallas, and the S.S. car was too far back to give him fast attention! Yes, you pointedly demolished that phony claim by the usual Kennedy-haters that Kennedy himself somehow could "order" S.S. agents away so people on the route could see him better, and he therefore caused his own death! That is cruel, not to mention completely wrong, as the S.S. can order the President in the law passed, not the other way around. And the S.S. did admit Kennedy did agree to do what the S.S. wanted in his entire 34 months as president, in order to protect him. Suddenly, that close protection as recently as in Tampa, FL with agents riding on the rear footrests and handles for over 26-miles, exactly as should have been replicated in Dallas, was not there!
Dead men tell no tales
There were a number of unusual things that happened that day. The phone system went down for about half hour immediately after the assassination in Washington. Oswald did not make all these unusual things happen. This assassination was orchestrated by Israel and the Rothchilds having the CIA do the killing. Members of the FBI and Secret Service were involved also.
The secret service stand down you are referring to is also on UA-cam…. Footage of it …
Who cares?
It could not be possible for the bullet to make a hole in Kennedy's back and then fall back to that location with no evidence of any material on it. If it actually was there and Pauls story is true then it would make more sense for it to be a plant by someone else who wanted a bullet with the Carcano marks on it to be found. Maybe Clint put it there? :)
I always wondered why Clint would crawl into the car? It was a little too late to help the President.
Maybe your mama did!...What a stupid remark!
@@shelahogletree7711 His job was to protect mrs kennedy. He talks elsewhere about that being his role
I don't know about you but I would love to see a professional marksmen replicate the shot from room, floor, vehicle, speed and even weather.
That shot was not very difficult!...Several trials concerning this have been held, with mixed results.
I can tell you never handled or shot a 6.5mm Italian Carcano rifle.....@@curbozerboomer1773
@@curbozerboomer1773
But have they ever asked Mark Wahlberg to duplicate it?
It's been tried, 3 aimed shots and it's an impossibility. Oswald was a distraction and a patsy. Kennedy was shot from the grassy knoll and the over pass.
@@curbozerboomer1773Sure. I imagine that you must be an expert paint baller.
Yes. That really clears up everything. Pathetic.
His story was never meant to "clear things up". But it makes more sense than the Warren Commission's magic bullet; that's what's pathetic.
This story just does not add up: a Secret Service Agent with a bullet with rifling marks does not responsibly hold on to the bullet and turn it in to proper chain of command authority? Anyone with training in police work would know the rifling (striping?) would most definitely tie the bullet to whatever gun fired it. An essential piece of evidence that should have been tagged and identified with the time and location where it was found and the name of the person who found it and turned it in.
Better yet, the bullet should have been left where it was located on the limousine, for fingerprinting, (and today DNA testing), as well as ballistic trajectory analysis.
Of course in 1963, he did not have a mobile phone to call for backup to cordon off the limousine from the surging crowd at Parkland Hospital, so maybe it makes sense that he would pick up belongings and evidence that might otherwise have disappeared.
Furthermore, the bullet as seen in the Exhibit photo does not in any way appear deformed from impact, . . . which raises all kinds of questions.
And then, why did Agent Landis not pick up the “2 bright brass bullet fragments” (8:59) “on the seat,” "one of them, like my pinky finger, it was kind of mushroomed", . . . IN ADDITION to the "intact, . . . fully . . ., bullet," (9:14) seen "where the cushioning met the trunk of the car" that he did pick up, put in his pocket, and later placed on the gurney?
So, according to this eyewitness, there were at least 2 bullets, which the NBC moderator did not acknowledge.
Like everything in the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and years that followed, the Kennedy Assassination was a whirlwind of confusion, cacophony, and unreliable investigation.
Bill Cooper showed missing footage. The DRIVER shot Kennedy. Skull & Bones Secret Society(Bush). Notice Jackie holding RED ROSES(death) and right afterward YELLOW ROSES(friendship) were scattered over the backseat. UNREAL that SPELLS Sheeple cant seem to see. Its also the 33 parallel. Same with 911. Totally Masonic number.
DRIVER shot Kennedy. Bill Cooper showed the footage. Skull & Bones(BUSH) arranged it.... Bill Cooper was murdered. A fake alien attack planned with very realistic holograms. Like 911 holograms were used. Our government works for the bankers not the people.
Exactly. This is just another book sales tour all this has been explained by forensic ballistic experts. I can only assume they are trying to appeal to a different generation again.
Why wouldn't you come forwards with this longs agoes ,???? Not coming forwards with makes him part of it ECT.with his silence . Now's he's tampering s with evidence .So he's has toos plays alongs the storyline s that beens told s !!.or possibly jails times !! !!Now's sell sells his books ECT. Perhaps! He waited longs enough tells his story as he knows inter fearances ofs crime comes with prison s times as bigs fine .
Guess you didn't read the book?
You can not be serious ... At 16:15 Landis says "I saw a bullet and wanted to preserve it, and make sure it did not get lost." So what does he do ?? He just lays it on a stretcher without telling a soul, having no clue who might find it, and leaves. HEY - how about giving it to Roy Kellerman the Secret Service Agent in charge that day and then showing him EXACTLY where you found it ?? Then he keeps silent about it for 60 years, even though it ends up being (somehow) found on Connolly's stretcher. I 100% believe Clint Hill, who not only was the most attuned person in Dealey Plaza that day, but has been the most honest, transparent, reliable and haunted witness since Nov. 22, 1963.
Clint Hill wrote a very good books about 10 years ago in which he contacted EVERY Secret Service agent on the JFK detail asking for their accounts and recollections but Landis says he was never even contacted. BS. Then Landis makes the even more ludicrous claim that he merely found the bullet QUOTE "just lying where the seam on the back seat meets the middle of the trunk, and it's uhh where they would have attached the bubbletop." So that is on TOP of the back seat.
So now JFK researchers who question that the spent "magic bullet" had been likely to have fallen out of Connolly's wrist and ended up on his stretcher - is going to instead try to imagine this same bullet (not pristine in any way to begin with, base is completely oval) went IN Kennedy's back but then just fell out BEHIND him. And what convenient timing for this new money-maker of a Book --- 2 months before the 60th anniversary of that horrible day.
This guy is full of bs. He saw a last opportunity to make some money for his kids and grandkids, before he leaves this planet.
I still remember what and where I was when this happened. SAD day in America.
Me too in the UK
Me too. 4th grade.
my age exactly.@@chgosatrap
So when you say you still remember "what" you were back then? Are you saying you weren't always human? Were you a turtle when it happened? I'm curious
He didnt want anything to happen to the bullet and he put in in the gurney? ☹️ oh wow! worse place.
@Miranda - I don't believe for one second took 'that" of piece of
evidence and laid it near the Presidents foot "figuring" the M.E.
would find it, That is absurd, It could have rolled off the gurney
when they moved it. Someone, for whatever reason, could have
taken it. He "should" have slipped it into his pocket, and he knew
that was evidence, you tell no one about it, put it next to the dead
Presidents feet who was just assassinated and that's how
you safeguard an important piece of evidence? Why didn't
he easily slip it into his pocket where it would have been
well safeguarded. After he spoke about this whole story,
I call b.s. on it and would NEVER believe a single word out
of his mouth. What he was saying is totally ridiculous. I think
we know "who" was happy about this pre-planned assassination
and who carried it out. And that's all I'm going to say about it.
I think...if this happened at all...Landis just made an impulsive decision, and then realized he had made a real booboo!...so he left it where someone else would find it. I doubt if this story is true.
And he waits 60 years to tell us.
I am writing this from memory, without referring to any books on the assassination. It has long been thought that the pristine bullet either worked its way out of the president's back when the doctors in the trauma room were trying to save the president's life, or else it was placed on the stretcher by somebody (which led to theories that the bullet was planted in order to frame Oswald). My recollection is that witnesses said it was found on Kennedy's stretcher and not Connally's stretcher, which has always been one of the difficulties with the single bullet theory, the other being, of course, that a nearly pristine bullet could not have done all that damage to two bodies. One of the doctors at Parkland Hospital probed with his finger the wound in Kennedy's back and found it to be only three inches deep, which suggests that the bullet struck him at a low velocity. If I recall correctly, this was a not uncommon defect with a Mannlicher Carcano rifle. Given the Secret Service agent's account of where he found the bullet, this all makes sense. And it is consistent with the long standing criticism that Kennedy's throat wound could not have been caused by the same bullet that entered his back because: (1) the throat wound was several inches higher than the back wound; (2) the president was sitting upright when he was struck in the throat as the Zapruder film clearly shows; and (3) the back wound was not a through wound. The conclusion is almost inescapable that the throat wound was caused by a bullet fired from the front. Its dimensions have never been described because it was obliterated by the tracheotomy, so it was never identified as an entrance wound or an exit wound. This leaves us with five bullets: one that missed the limousine altogether, one that struck Kennedy in the back, one that struck Kennedy in the throat, one that did all the damage to Connally, and one that hit Kennedy in the head. Some of the witnesses said they heard three shots, others said they heard four or five. Given the rapid sequence of the shots, the echoes in Dealey Plaza, and the differing locations of the witnesses, it is no wonder that accounts differ. In defense of the Secret Service agent, he was wise to protect the evidence without turning it over to the Dallas police. Granted, it would have been better if the bullet could have remained where it was found until the car was photographed as a crime scene, but it was not in his power to make that happen. His concern about souvenir hunters was not unreasonable. If he is telling the truth, I thank him for coming forward. -- Richard Hayes Phillips
What about the bullet that struck the front windshield.
I agree with the bullet coming back out of Kennedy's back , it is possible that 9 shots were fired plan A at the intersection turning into the plaza where the limo went wide ( Greer ) panicked the first volley occured .
I disagree about one thing. The ER doctors have made it clear that the neck wound was an entrance wound and it was the exit wound from that bullet that blew out most of the president's brain from the right back of his head. This would mean there was someone firing from the front, either from the grassy knoll or the overpass. It was not Oswald (or anyone else) firing only from the back.
Although the bullet could have been under-powered, another possibility is that it struck Kennedy just below the top of the steel and leather brace he was wearing. The brace was described by the chief doctor in Trauma Room 1 who described how it curved up in the back from under the arms. This would have acted like a bullet proof vest and could have prevented the bullet from penetrating more that the few inches described by the examining doctors. The brace could account for the bullet's relatively pristine condition, especially if the leather part of the brace bore the brunt of the bullet's force. This theory could be verified or refuted by an examination of the back brace if it is preserved somewhere.
@@jefferydowler4655That was a bully fragment from the third shot that hit JFK in the back of the head
I am hard pressed to imagine how a bullet fired from a gun could possibly come to a stop without deformation. I have enough familiarity with ballistics to realize that really cannot happen. A bullet hitting a down ski jacket will deform. The velocity is just so great and the bullet is designed to deform. Thats why its made of lead. (The guy said brass but he was mistaken - bullets are lead with copper jackets)
I don’t bring this up to cast doubt on this guys story but rather to just clarify the fact that bullets don’t just stop without deforming. And they deform a lot. So assuming this story is truthful - what could that tell us?
I did not mention it as not sure if I was correct but you confirmed the "Oswald bullets" were copper jacketed over the lead core. That's why they don't disintegrate (frangible or disintegrating) bullets that spewed hundreds of tiny pieces in Kennedy's skull. That also by itself destroys the myth, and Paul Landis inadvertent saying he found TWO tiny bullet fragments, right there destroys his own conclusion in still defending the massively discredited WC Report, although he doesn't realize what he is saying in the conclusion of finding the fragments, and where he found them. Not where Connally was, but where Jackie was, after he fell into where she was sitting. How ironic, that Paul Landis may get the crooked MSM to finally acknowledge their cover-up (the NY Times is one letting its guard down a little more now!) and allowing the government narrative control them. And if not most of the MSM, then many people will figure out they were lied to by the government-media axis after 60 years of denying it was nobody else by Oswald!
@@freeguy77 Qanon guy might be more apt, freeguy.
Oswalds bullets were "military jacketed" bullets, designed to go right through soldiers on the battlefield, limiting somewhat their internal injuries. remember, the rifle used was a WW2 surplus rifle, of Italian origin. It cost Oswald around $ 13 dollars!
@@curbozerboomer1773
Good Point. What we call Full Metal Jacket bullets May pass through without major deformation. I’m still a little doubtful but… it’s a fair point.
The gun itself makes no difference. After all a guns job is simply to hit the back of the bullet with a firing pin.
So an AR-15 is really no different from an old WW2 rifle except perhaps with regard to accuracy.
The bullet was a plant. This is plain to see.
My spiddy senses are tingling listening to this guy. Lets see if I got this right, he takes it upon himself to tamper with evidence at a crime scene (the bullet). He says he's concerned about the safety of the bullet (getting lost) yet he leaves it on the presidents gurney unattended and doesn't report to anybody what he did?!? And what's up with the cigarette lighter he also removes from the crime scene, finder's keepers?!? Nope, something is not right with this guy in my humble opinion.
Exact same phrase I used years ago, like 10 years ago, or so, when the other guy was interviewed along with him, I don't even have to watch 1 sec of this to know who it is, it's one of the two that they've been interviewing for years. Also did you not notice that, the fatal shot, ONLY comes when he stops in the street ?? He comes down to nearly a full stop, the fatal shot hits the front/side of this head, and then they drive off with him dead. Did you notice ?
@@xfiazc07 he's obviously got a guilty conscience from obstruction of justice and he's a traitor in my book and a coward
Yes, something happened, let me write a book 60 years after the fact.
Exactly what would he gain from lying or taking something from the scene of a crime?
@@cfields813 Did you listen to him talking?
Clint Hill, with all respect to him, has a vested interest in this new evidence being rejected by the public.
And what would that be? Please do lay it out for us.
Yes, absolutely. Thank you for mentioning that.
And you are '' the pubic''---Hahahahahahahahaha
Why would that be? This guy says he was not interviewed by anyone after the assassination. That beggars belief. Big time. I'm not buying that.
@@clayoreilly4553 I am not selling that !
From Landis’ Official Report Submitted on November 27, 1963:
As the Motorcade passed the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) “None of the windows were open, and I did not see anyone standing by them.”
[Numerous windows were open and people were visible in many of them.]
“The President's car and the Follow-up car had just completed their turns and both were straightening out [on Elm Street].”
“At this moment I heard what sounded like the report of a high-powered rifle from behind me, over my right shoulder. When I heard the sound there was no question in my mind what it was.”
[Surely the Warren Commission would want to hear every word Landis had to say.]
“I did not realize that President Kennedy had been shot at this point.”
“It was at this moment that I heard a second report and saw the President's head split open and pieces of flesh and blood flying through the air.”
“President slumped out of sight towards Mrs. Kennedy.”
“My reaction at this time was that the shot came from somewhere towards the front, right-hand side of the road.”
[That area would include the Triple Underpass and the Grassy Knoll. The Warren Commission immediately lost interest in Landis because they did not want to hear a single word about a shot coming from the front or the right.]
“I did not notice anyone on the overpass, and I scanned the area to the right of and below the overpass where the terrain sloped towards the road on which we were traveling.”
[Landis did not look to the TSBD following the head shot, he looked to the Grassy Knoll.]
“I do not recall hearing a third shot.”
When the Motorcade arrived at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Landis said “Mrs. Kennedy's purse and hat and a cigarette lighter were on the back seat. I picked these three items up as I walked through the car and followed Mrs. Kennedy into the hospital.”
A purse!
A hat!!
A cigarette lighter!!!
Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!!
Not one word about bullet fragments!!!!!
Not one word about placing the pristine bullet on President Kennedy’s gurney!!!!!!
Landis’ 60th Anniversary memory improvement is too little, too late, and unbelievable!!!!!!!
The official report to whom? Secret Service? The Warren Commission was two days away from being formed (Nov. 29th 1963) so a Nov 27th report could not have been WC testimony. Please furnish your source.
''Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!!''--------------------------Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah Why ?Hahahahahahahahahah Mistery?Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha Enigma? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaa
I believe you are correct!
To stop who?
@@narancauk In English the correct phraseology is “To stop whom?” If you have a serious question, please express it. Otherwise, do not waste our time.
One of the most important principals of police work is continuity of evidence. From the time it is first secured, it must be documented to whom it is transferred every time it is transferred.
Hmmm, seems pretty strange. What about HIS fingerprints on this bullet? The only other remote explanation is this might have been the 3rd bullet no one could find from 3 shots. However, for a highly-trained secret service agent to tamper with evidence and then remain silent just doesn't add up.
I thought the Secret Service was smarter than this, I was wrong. 😮
He kept this to himself all these years and now he wants to sell a book. That's some integrity there.
Sure he has lots of time spend it. People like you would defend stalin or hitler or mao.
He doesn’t deserve to make any money off his book. There’s no excuse for not speaking up at the time which as a Secret Agent, he knew better.
Well...remember, that he left the Secret just a few months after this shooting...and his resume of jobs afterwards point to a guy who was, shall we say, not the brightest bulb in the chandelier!!! Back then, the standards for Secret Service job...and even standards for police work...were quite low...also, the pay was not so good back in the day.
I WAS 13 YEARS OLD AND IN SCHOOL, THAY SENT US HOME, THIS WAS THE DAY THIS COUNTRY CRIED, AND THE WORLD CRIED WITH US.
It was also the day that America died for me . The assassination changed everything in America for the worst & has never recovered . Now that is the shame of it .
Killed any possibility of credibility when he said that Oswald was the lone assassin. 🤨
Exactly cause it was way too early in the so-called investigation to come to that conclusion. The lone assassin bs was regurgitated for a reason and we all know it deep down
Oswald had nothing to do with.He was killed because of Dimona. JFK didnt want to stop monitor Dimona because he didnt want them to have a nuclear arsenal.
Thank you for coming forward.
This man's statement that he believes it was Oswald, acting alone, could simply be fear. In the weeks after the assassination, people in Dallas became aware that some of those who had a piece of information that contradicted the official story of it being the "lone nut" Oswald were being found dead, their deaths poorly staged as suicides, but looking like murders in reality. In the next 15 years, many people who knew things about the assassination that didn't go along with the government's version died under "mysterious" circumstances. It's possible that he waited all these years to tell his story for the same reason.
Totally bogus...those mystery deaths were all accounted for!...try reading a book.
If you really want to be surprised.... find out what happened to the regular driver that was supposed to be driving that day.
@@guarenchafa4912 What happened to him?
Who exactly died under mysterious circumstances? Dazzle us with facts!
curbozerboomer. the deaths all happened under very unusual circumstances. none have been explained as due to circumstance. you need to read Richard Belzer's book "Hit List" and not all those CIA approved and directed books.
I was born in 1965 two years after his assination, in 1984 my History class all believed that there was a CIA cover up.
Yes, thanks to the myriad of conspiracy spreaders:
ua-cam.com/video/DC8tO16xdrY/v-deo.html
He still doesnt realize his testimony proves oswald didnt act alone
He never thought about it? Sounds strange to me.
How are bullet fragments brass?
I agree. It doesn't make any sense he would put the bullet on the gurney. I can see why he'd want to pick it up to make sure someone didn't take it with all the melee going on but, why wouldn't he show it to other SS agents, or the police or some other authority? Why did he stay silent? Maybe he was told by the CIA to keep his mouth shut... who knows.
Anyone with a microscope and had grade 5 chemistry could clearly tell if there was more then 1 gun man...the rifling on the bullet doesnt lie
That’s wild. He just killed the magic bullet theory but he still thinks Oswald acted alone???? How?
Because they're still covering it up. The country changed hands that day and we've never gotten it back.
I think he says he still believes Lee Oswald “did it” but had help in the process, i.e. an accomplice. I might be wrong about this.
Exactly, @HeyDuffy459. It makes no sense. I think he might just be a confused old man. Also: If CE 399 didn't exit through Kennedy's neck from behind -- if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none.
@@calva221" if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There would be no exit wound if the bullet used was a frangible (exploding) bullet.
Wait til u get old and can't really remember....wrote a freaking book
this guy himself looks suspicious too. why did he pick up the bullet, put it in his pocket then throw it on to the gurney?Even a rookie cop does not do this.
Why did the Warren commission not ask him anything. HE Was not a witness called by the Warren commission who had a slam dunk patsy
''Why did the Warren commission not ask him anything''-------Hahahahahahahahhah Why do you think....................?
And he told no one about this until now. Give me a break.
Just like Clint Hill, neither account can be trusted. They both waited.
Because they both suffered from PTSD, and Clint was an alcoholic for years.@@seahour9147
It was the president, but what a horrible event for any who were involved. To witness the utter violence of seeing any human being being shot, especially a head wound like that, never leaves you, never. You will see it for the rest of your life. May that man have peace. There is probably not a day that goes by that he doesnt think of it. Things like that never leave your mind, never.
I worked in a hospital in the mid 1980’s. A 14 year old boy was flown in who had suffered a shotgun wound to the face and head. Trust me. You don’t forget it.
He's a COWARD, waits waits 60 years to disclose what is EVIDENCE of a Crime this Thing is SLIME he's no man in my eyes.
They leave your mind when you die.
@@patrickhart4299 Don't be harder on Landis than his superiors who never wanted the truth.
@@vernpascal1531 He's LYING and there is proof of it.
There was a hole in the windshield of the limo.
This is probably the bullet that came from the other direction.
It explains a lot.
Not a hole, just an area where a bullet fragment from the head shot hit the glass...no actual penetrating hole!
This explains even more: the windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. The idea somebody was trying to frame this on Oswald from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), in plain line of sight of everybody in the motorcade, firing through glass (!) and shooting Kennedy in the face is laughable.
This is ridiculous. "ok, we better not lose this important piece of evidence so I will just lay here on the gurney and walk away. Nothing will happen to it."
This doesn't seem credible. A trained secret service agent, with important crime scene evidence but doesn't even inform his superiors, really?
However, I always thought the stretcher bullet came from Kennedy's back, and this confirms it. Also, in the interview he says 'I heard the first shot, then a second shot closely followed by a third'. Why doesn't the interviewer ask how close together were 2nd and 3rd shots? This is absolutely crucial to the case. If the shots were very close together - some witnesses said they were almost on top of each other - then there had to be two shooters, because it's impossible to reload and fire that quickly. Two shooters equals conspiracy...
The retired agents story just does not make sense to me . After almost 60 years he comes forward and says he moved the bullet from the Kennedy car to a gurney . I also wonder about shots 2 and 3 being so close together . I remember NBC reporter Robin MacNeil was on the scene in Dallas . He also mentioned that shots 2 and 3 were so close . The other thing that bothers me is none of the several reporters went back to Parkland the next day . I would have thought they might interview the emergency dept staff .
Yeah, many witnesses describe the 2nd and 3rd shots as being very close to one another. Their testimony was either altered or ignored altogether by the Warren report.@@larrysproul9424
I agree, an important detail glossed over by many. Also, an important piece of evidence not mentioned in the WC report. The last 2 shots being almost on top of each other indicates multiple shooters. These were probably the 3rd and 4th shots, not the 2nd and 3rd. His memory might be confusing the last 2 as one, a possibility in the echo chamber of Daley Plaza and the passage of time. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots that would mask the sound of another shooter? Why didn't he fire a 4th shot? the Carcano rifle had a 4-round magazine. Was Oswald aware of other shooters or was he led to believe he was going to be the hero and then only put the pieces together when he said he was a patsy? This is a carefully rehearsed statement about the 3 shots and his general agreement with the official report. Many questions here after he could have tampered with evidence and did not protect the crime scene or notify his superiors of his actions.
Only a few witnesses actually mentioned the last two shots being clos together...The consensus is, that Dealey Plaza was subject to lots of echo...this was proven by subsequent rifles being shot, as an experiment. Three shots only...and Oswald actually had over 8 seconds to shoot the 2nd and 3rd shots...he obviously got more accurate with each shot!
Doesn't make sense. If there were lots of echo you would hear multiple sounds surely? An echo on first shot, echo on 2nd shot, echo on 3rd shot - multiple echos. But that's not what people said they heard...@@curbozerboomer1773
60 years ? why keep such an important thing from everybody?
Getting a call at 10pm and a strange crackly voice tells you that they were enjoying watching your grandaughter in the playground could be very persuasive.
Do some reading.
No excuse die telling the truth then....they should put him in jail
@@postergmail6202 😄thanks
I'm sorry for being so graphic, I don't buy the one shooter theory. I'm an experienced hunter and I've never seen an animals organs or tissues blow backwards when it was shot. The President's brain, if shot from the rear, would have splattered all over Governor Connally and his wife, not all over the rear of the limo. Mrs. Kennedy was seen and has stated that she crawled up on the rear of the limo to retrieve pieces of her husbands' brain. That shot had to have been from the front, thus proving there were at least two shooters. The bullet that was found by the Presidents' side, if it had been any of the bullets that struck either The President or governor Connally would have been deformed by the impact, which is what bullets are designed to do. I'm sorry, but the evidence screams conspiracy/cover-up.
Im glad he came forward he was prob scared to death to talk after all the stuff that happened
Very well done report! Thanks so much!
This makes no sense..he would have been trained to report evidence where found ...US Secret Service is very strict in their training and was even then...
Not so much, I am afraid!
Why put the bullet onto the gurney if you were trying to protect the evidence?😮
What a shame that he still seems to be fearful.
And it's taken this guy 60 years to state this? Come on....
He should of come out with this information years ago. Waiting this long is a terrible mistake as he could of put an end to the whole lone gunman BS.
Except he said he believed that Oswald acted alone based on the 3 shots he heard and the 3 spent cartridges found in the school book depository. The bullet possibly fell off of Governor Connally as they pulled and tugged and lifted him out of the jump seat in front of the President.
Shot that killed him came from front
That's what a Pathologist from Pgh, Pa. Cyril Wecht that examined JFK at Walter Reed and said he was hit from the front. He said they botched the skull and stitches were in place.
Yes, somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from behind stood in front and shot Kennedy in the face.
From driver
First, thanks S/A Landis for your service to our country. Second, some time before he died in 1997, didn't S/A Sam Kinney state that it was he who put the bullet on the gurney? Does this mean that two bullets were found and left (without tagging as evidence) on two different gurneys, or are two agents taking credit for the same act? The upcoming book may be an interesting read, but I'm curious as to who funded the project. Which companies contributed? And of course, at 4:23, if a bullet rolled from JFK's gurney to Gov. Connally's, without hitting the floor, then it truly was a magic bullet indeed.
ua-cam.com/video/cyf70ziwWgs/v-deo.html&lc=UgzljQypP_I2Xkl-v_N4AaABAg
You are correct regarding Sam Kinney. During a TV interview he revealed that he put a bullet from the limo onto a stretcher in Parkland. He didn't say "Why" he didn't turn it in to his USSS supervisor and he didn't describe the bullet itself. Unsurprisingly, this statement was "cut" from the broadcast. Kinney wasn't pleased by this...
The orderly that actually found the stretcher bullet turned it over to the hospital head of Security. Both stated unequivocally that CE399 was "not" the bullet found on the stretcher. The third person who had custody of the bullet stated that he could not identify CE399 as the bullet he was given. The bullets further chain of custody is contradictory and cannot be determined.
Paul Landis (apparently) didn't mention whether CE399 was or was not the bullet that he put on the stretcher. His reason for leaving it on the stretcher (he didn't want it to get "lost") doesn't explain why he removed evidence from a crime scene, showed it to no other SS agent at the crime scene, and did not turn it in to his supervisor. Although not explicitly stated, he told no one that he left the bullet on the stretcher. He had to know that by moving the bullet to the stretcher it would effect any proper analysis of the crime, yet he never revealed his actions to the SS. His actions are inexplicable - unless of course he was protecting this evidence from the Secret Service itself, because he firmly believed that they would "lose" it. What did he know - - that convinced him he couldn't trust SS???
No it means that Landis is pushing a book.
@@thomasneal4775 Listen to the interview. He said his motivation for removing the bullet was that all kinds of people were converging on the car and he wanted to preserve the evidence. Not saying it is true or not true but that is what he says in this interview.
What you say is true and I am aware. Read my reply. I go on to state that he gives no explanation as to why he leaves the limo bullet on the stretcher, nor why he tells no one that he did it! This is unquestionably a case of altering the crime scene, which presents false evidence to any investigation. Obviously, he should have turned the bullet in to SS, but elected NOT to do this. The only explanation is he didn't trust them with the evidence. To be certain, only minutes after the shooting, that the bullet was unsafe with SS we must ask the question, "What did he know prior to the shooting, or what did he see during the shooting?" Additionally, how did a "pristine" (as Landis states) bullet enter JFK's back, bounce off, or fall out and end up on top of the back of JFK's seat? Given your statement regarding the large number of people around the limo at the time, anyone of them could have placed it there as easily as Landis placed the bullet on the stretcher.
Who was that tv anchor on the phone repeating the spokesman’s statement?
Frank McGee
Thank you.
He was very calm & professional.
I looked him up & read that he continually reported for 48 hours on the assassination.
Is tampering with evidence in a murder investigation a crime?
I haven't watched this yet but i assume they are finally going to admit that the 3rd bullet was accidentally fired from an armourlite rifle in the secret service car travelling behind
It's interesting you say that, because I know a former senior police officer in the UK (Chief Superintendent level), and after he retired he did his own investigation. I asked him, "Was Kennedy shot from two different directions?", and he said pretty much what you said. "He was shot from three directions. The third was an accidental discharge from security people from behind"
Nope...that book, "Mortal Error" was debunked, based on actual ballistics--and by film! many years ago, in fact--the supposed SS agent who accidentally fired his AR 15 weapon, sued the authors of the book, and won a large sum of money..His name was George Hickey.
Flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, medical and ballistic evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of the book that accused him.
@@herseem Want to frame a shooting on a lone gunman? Just fire away from multiple directions!
The story I heard, and that makes the most sense (to me), is the two-shooter theory: Oswald plus a very hungover secret service guy. The secret service guy, reacting to Oswald’s shots, ACCIDENTALLY shot Kennedy. The guy apparently became a hopeless alcoholic as a result.
SEE: “Mortal Error: The Shot That Killed Kennedy” by Bonar Menninger.
I don’t believe Oswald made ANY of the shots at all.. when he was first confronted in the cafeteria of the book suppository he was calmly sitting at a table drinking a coke.. THERE IS NO WAY IN THE WORLD YOU COULD SHOOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THEN FIVE MINUTES LATER BE CALMLY DRINKING A COKE!!! Anyone who had just done something like that would’ve been so nervous they wouldn’t be able to sit still.. let alone be calmly drinking a coke!! 😮
Menniger's theory is flatly contradicted by film, eyewitness, ballistic and medical evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers.
Stop drinking and commenting 😂😂😂😂
6:22 - this and the photo after it is agent Clint Hill, not Paul Landis.
How much stock should we put into the memory of someone in their 80s from an event that took place 60 years ago? Most people his age can not remember what they did the pervious week.
Exactly. There is a book to sell
Well it explains 2 things how it got on the gurney and explained the back wound. Plus destroying the magic bullet theory ?
This clown doesn't even explain what the heck is supposed to have happened to the bullet that DID go through Connally.
I would like to see if he was interviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990's and what was recorded? The fact that the "Super" Secret Service when instructed by the ARRB not to destroy records did in fact destroy records speaks volumes about what they were hiding. Also the fact that the two Naval doctors at the Bethesda autopsy never performed a gunshot autopsy, then burned or lost their original autopsy reports is troubling. These doctors reported the back wound was shallow with no projectile found, yet world renown pathologist, Dr. Cyril Wecht states bullets do not "back out" of wounds. And add in the fact that in the Warren commission final report, then Congressman Gerald Ford moved the back wound up several inches to fit the single bullet theory. Now add this into the narrative is to muddy up the waters further while President Biden refused to release the remaining Assassination Records. Imagine that?
True.
Both administrations refused to release the last documents.
He wasn’t interviewed by the Warren Report group, but you likely know that. I first heard this on the “Redacted” editorialized news report.
I wish you had interviewed Landis on this NBC segment and not Mr. Touchy-Feely.
Hmm, strange Oswald's military records are "missing" also. Key evidence has this way of being missing. If Oswald was the lone assassin then there would be no need for any of this to happen.
88 years old and ahhh I rest my case
Never trust anyone over 30.
Who was the FBI Director and who was the head of the CIA at the time im just wondering?
J. Edgar Hoover. FBI. And John MaCone CIA.
@@howieduin915 hey i keep trying to remember did George Bush take the director position right after that happened?
You could find this on your own...try reading a freaking book!
@@curbozerboomer1773 good point
How odd that agent Sam Kinney, driver of the back up car said in 2013 that HE found the bullet.
this is an advertisement to sell a book. boo. not news.
There is that…
"this is an advertisement to sell a book. boo. not news"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... in your opinion. People interested in this history consider it highly newsworthy. You sound very young. Go back to playing video games.
@@kenthompson5723 i dont play video games aye. ty for calling me young.
Hire a hitman. Hire a hitman for the hitman. The plot of every episode of The Untouchables. How anybody thinks it wasn't a Mafia hit is beyond me. They got Bobby too! Dorothy Kilgallen figured out their scheme and they hit her as well.
m10000. 💯👍
We know how this works from Hollywood movies. A professional hit is always done using a shooter and a backup man. See "Bullett" and "The seven Ups". There are other examples out there as well.
Time for your meds.
If Kilgallen had any info that was going to blow any plot she was sure in no hurry to do anything with any of it. The HSCA investigated her death and found no evidence of foul play.
What makes it ironic is that I found a life magazine from December 1963 at my thrift store today… And JFK and Jackie 70th wedding anniversary is today…
Synchronicity
I thought I remembered some anniversary on Sep. 12. It is 70 years since their wedding day. Only 10 years and 2 months later, it was over.
You may want to look up the definition of “ironic”, because there is nothing ironic about your post
As a 6 yr old kid in 63, I had no knowledge Immediately, then caught on.
pieces keep falling into place. Does Paul Landis state or recall exactly what part of the back seat was the bullet found? I would appreciate a response via a sketch or photo of the back seat of the limo with location of bullet marked on it. This would greatly assist me with some research I am doing. Even a direct contact email with Mr. Landis would help if you do not have the information I am asking for. Thanks, Loty
There's a very simple explanation to this story. First, there's no way this is the bullet that struck Kennedy's head, and there's no way the one that went through his throat ended up falling on the seat immediately after leaving Kennedy's body. However, the most likely explanation is that it's the bullet that went through both men, and fell on the seat when they removed Connally's injured body from the vehicle. The jump seat was right there close to Kennedy's seat. BTW - the term "magic bullet" was coined before it was generally known that the jump seat was inboard of where Kennedy was sitting... Initially it was believed that Connally sat exactly in front of Kennedy, making it such that the bullet would have had to turn a corner to enter Connally's body. But he was not sitting precisely in front of Kennedy - he was slightly inboard from him.
No bullet went through both men. That never happened.
@@user-ou5ci7ro4l Really? prove it.
Thank you for your honestly and logical understanding of what likely happened. Unfortunately honesty and logic don’t sell books. You won’t get many “likes” with your position, but rest assured that you’re right. I just heard a refreshing interview (about this agent’s claims) with Gerald Posner, who wrote “Case Closed”, in my mind the definitive book on the JFK assassination.
@@dickhsv Agreed. All of those conspiracy books have been written to rake in the money. Even Oliver Stone ignores the fact that the jump seats were inboard so he can sell more copies of the JFK movie. All of the evidence points towards 3 shots fired from the Texas School Book Depository, including the Zapruder film. If you look at it frame by frame, the frame in which Kennedy is shot shows his head moving FORWARD, and the majority of brain and bone matter flying off in front of him.
Posner’s was the absolute worst book I read about the assassination. Read books authored by Charles Crenshaw (one of the ER doctors that operated on JFK) and you will understand why Posner was WAY off base.
It's understandable as to why Landis had fear regarding his action/ account. Everyone who posed a possible serious challenge to the narrative (for quite some time), ended up dead.
Rubbish. Who? Who "ended up dead?" lol
The book : HIT LIST, by the late actor, comedian (& intellectual)- Richard Beltzer, is a sad, but compelling synopsis of all the deaths surrounding the JFK association.
for the first time ever, i give nbc a thumbs up.
What about the head shot? You think Lee Harvey Oswald took that shot too? It doesn't make any sense.
Yes he was Olympic gold medalist .
narancauk. . He was not!! who is paying you to spread disinformation??
It would be a clear and direct shot for Oswald.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle.
A man who could have plausibly been Oswald was seen in the window.
No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the crime scene.
Oswald lied about his whereabouts during the shooting.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow and rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@narancauk Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook. Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away.
@@aaronz7056 ''Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle ''.--------Smuggled .For whom????Do you know how long take to assemble a rifle especially with co workers walking around? You should try. Hahahahahahahahahaha
We will never know what really happened there. But thanks for sharing with us.
We actually DO know what happened...stop being lazy, do some reading.
A normal secret service guy does not leave a bullet anywhere. He places it in a bag and gives it to the police for example.
5 minutes and 47 seconds before we get to hear the guy talk. NBC, it's OK to tighten up the intro.
Somehow Oliver Stone knew all about this 33 years ago.
Jim Garrison was how Oliver Stone knew. Let's not forget that. Garrison's investigation was brilliant and courageous. He paid a heavy price as he was a victim of character assassination by the FBI, the CIA, and our news media. Oliver Stone did an excellent job of bringing Jim Garrison's investigation to public view.
💯
We’ve all known about it for 55 years. The warren commission was corrupt.
I was thinking along those lines.
Him and millions of Americans
At 9:00 minutes in he says he found "bullet fragments". One was the size of the end of his pinky and mushroomed and he doesn't mention the other of the "two shiny fragments". THEN he found the intact bullet above the seat. Those fragments were forensic evidence. I have never heard that any fragments were found in the limo, and I have written a movie and an upcoming book on this. The limo was a crime scene. Today we know of CSI or CSU, but homicide detectives for decades preserved, photographed, and documented things like fragments and blood splatter as important in determining the direction of a bullet. The direction of the bullet is at the center of the whole 60 years of conspiracy madness. I find it hard to believe that SS agents were not, at minimum, aware of crime scene procedure. There are eyewitness accounts of them scrubbing down the back seat right outside Parkland Hospital. Destroying blood splatter forensics. Also if the bullet was on the back ledge of the limo, then it never entered the limo. (Although a sub-sonic bullet, meeting any object would have either dug in or bounced off, Kennedy had a back brace. Maybe the bullet glanced off that,) but the kinetic energy of a projectile traveling like a bullet pushes the bounds of physics to suggest that it just stopped cold and fell onto the open rear deck of the limo which had just sped down the Stemmons Freeway at 80-90 miles an hour taking turns and stopping with a lurch. For these and a few other reasons, to my way of thinking, this does not line up with reality. - Tom Avitabile, author of Ask Not!
You are CORRECT !!! Cyril Wecht has explained that bullets LODGE in a victim and NEVER fall out !! Witnesses before the ARRB described Dr. Humes ALTERING JFK's wounds in a Bethesda morgue room BEFORE the official autopsy at 8pm !! One witness saw autopsy doctor Humes take a BONE SAW to JFK's skull !!! Humes REMOVED the back bullet, the throat bullet, and mutilated the head before the autopsy !! C.E. 399 was a PLANTED bullet meant to link to the depository rifle....which was NOT even the rifle Oswald was photographed with !!!
The cover up started immediately after the last bullit was fired , the official story was just three shots fired , if mr Teague hadn’t been hit with a piece of flying debris , then they wouldn’t have had to come up with the Magic bullit theory . Sounds like three bullits found on that back seat of the limousine fragments , mushroom , and intacked pristine. New evidence for a book just before the 60 anniversary of the assassination me thinks !
The most significant takeaway. You mention the 2 shiny objects in a pool of blood and he examined one. Put it back and grabbed the other bullet? Nope.
I wonder if Landis would care to speculate what sort of calibre round would be fired at a distance of 60-100 yards and yet would only have the power or force to penetrate about an inch of flesh in Kennedy’s back and then fall in to the back seat in a pristine condition. This man is mistaken.
A full-metal copper-jacketed bullet could, if its powder wasn't fully ignited, not go at the usual 2,000 ft/sec (approx. rifle round) velocity, and therefore, may not penetrate the body deeply after going through his suit jacket, and shirt before hitting his skin. The County Records building (behind and South of TSBD) added more distance, giving credence to where some say a hidden rifleman fired, hitting Kennedy in his MID-BACK, not the 'neck' area. If under-powered, it would then only go into him an inch or two, able to fall out with only minimal damage to it.
@@freeguy77 what would be the chance of that given circumstances that the powder would only partially ignite? How slow would the bullet have to be going at 60 yards for the bullet to just stick in him an inch.? And if it was going that slow the sniper would have to aim above Kennedy’s head for the flight curviture to hit him in the back.
@@wishchris Same way the front shooter shot way over Kennedy's head on one, or through the windshield (hole) on another shot, etc.! And a rear shot from the County Records building is far more than 60 yds (180 ft.), more like 300 feet (100 yds.) if near the fatal front right temple shot distance. Hey, we can't guess what caused an under-powered bullet, it just makes the most sense that it happened. Aimed at his mid-head but the underpowered bullet went lower (obviously) and hit in his mid-back! No, not aiming over his head; traveling at 800-1,000 ft/sec is not small, just not 2,000 ft/sec.
Could have been a defective, low-powered round...but no to worry...this scenario did not happen.
@@freeguy77 800 ft a second is still very very fast. It’s not just going to stick in his back a bit. It’s going to go right through him.
Six Seconds in Dallas... my campus of the University of Toronto had a copy of that, and I had it almost constantly signed out from late 1987 to early 1991... Eventually I found my own copy of it.
Well, that old man is a real big liar.
Those secret service people have a lot to account for ... where were they? ... even the Secret Service detail were perplexed by the absence of surround officers ... they weren't there ... even one of them only 3 minutes before had his hands in the air as if to say what is going on ??? You tell me ... a secret service detail who were conveniently absent at the time of impact !!!
That limo was terrifyingly lacking in Agents - WHY would they not be there, because they are PAID to be there. 🤔
They were exactly as close as they could have been without being on the car. And they were not on the car because JFK ordered that they not be on the car. Try to accept this fact.
@@calva221 It's not that don't or won't accept anything. Was simply unaware that Kennedy would order that. Non-sensical order, if you ask me, and I had years of U.S.ARMY training, and never heard an order on the level of that one.
🤔🤔🤨
@@ThisIS_Insane Sorry, I always think everyone knows what I know and CHOOSE to disregard it. Kennedy did tell the agents he didn't want them there because he believed they came between him and the people. One of his quotes on the subject was, while riding in a motorcade in Florida before Dallas: "Keep those Ivy league charlatans off the limo". Some try to dispute this but Clint Hill among other agents, like Jerry Blaine, say it's true and that's good enough for me.
@@calva221 they were hungover from to much moonshine the night before, and Vince Palamara in his book long ago demolished the myth that JFK ordered it.
It's sad what financial insecurity can lead some people to do. At least he's not peddling dope, though.
Exactly. Life in America
Why would this secret service agent touch and move a piece of evidence from one of the most horrific event in American history?!
The driver slowed down at the right moment and took off. Just look at front secret service mans reaction.
UPDATE: In a separate solo interview James Robenalt further explains his belief that the Bullet was undercharged (he claims that was not uncommon for the Manlicher Carcano) and being undercharged did not have the energy to go through the president but instead lodged in Kennedy's back (sticking out) Jackie comforting the president may have snagged the bullet and possibly it fell onto the back deck when she crawled over the rear of the limo. Highly plausible explanation of how it got on the rear ledge and wasn't deformed as a fully charged bullet would have been. Still doesn't explain the two shiny fragments. Or Landis not securing the crime scene (his primary protectee was Jackie so he was solely focused on her) but he could have commandeered someone (DPD or even a civilian to guard the car - maybe) This rationale has elevated my initial impression of Robenalt.
If 'undercharged' the muzzle pressure would have been greatly reduced and therefore it, being one of the audible shots, would have sounded different than the other "two" shots .. I see no research on the audio characteristics of a low pressure shot .. moreover, if a person, or group of persons, planned something as huge and horrible as this event, one would imagine they'd not be stupid and use cheap-o military ammo .. which is usually ball ammo ... American's know it's all a big sham. What will they do about it? Nothing. Of course.
@@DonMillerCET Don, I agree with everything you said here. One interesting wrinkle. Landis at first said he heard only two shots. (Later he said 3). If out of the 3 shots one was undercharged would that have resulted in a lower audio profile so he only heard the two fully charged while riding on the running board of the second car, so close to a cheering crowd? I’m not a advocating that, just wondering.
silencers were used by at least a couple assassins which may partially account for the reduced velocity and impact penetration.
Clint Hill was Jackie's personal protecting agent. Not Landis.
It it was Oswald, he sure would have used the same military ammo have was used to.@@DonMillerCET
Question not asked: Why did Landis believe he needed to tamper with (i.e., move and deposit elsewhere) such critically important evidence? Did he believe it would disappear if he left it where he first observed it? If so, why did he believe that? If not, Landis’ actions and statements demonstrate extremely shoddy safeguarding of crime scene evidence. Negligence and mishandling of evidence to that extent is more consistent with 1863 than 1963. Second question not asked: Why did Landis transplant the intact bullet but not the fragment? Mr. Landis, you condemned yourself with your own words. If what you say is true you have committed a great disservice to your oath, your agency and your country!
The guy's a lying clown just trying to cash in.
Souvenir hunters
No one has ever explained what people witnessed on the Grassy Knoll.
What did they witness? lol
Several people reported that a shot was fired from the Grassy Knoll.
@@aaronz7056
It makes absolutely no sense that a secret service agent would pick up a bullet and pick it up and put in his pocket....without turning it over to Dallas Police. That bullet was part of a crime scene. Putting it on a gurney was just stupid. Anything could have happened to it. Also, shortly after the president was brought in to parkland, someone was dispatched to clean up the back seat of the limousine with a rag and a mop of water. This is madness! That was a crime scene. The location of blood and brain tells a lot about bullet trajectories.
Phenomenal coverage of this story!
If it wasn't for the motorcycle cops mike being left on, and the eyewitness that was struck by curb fragments, they would not have altered their 3 shot theory. They took an identical rifle, placed it in a vice, and tried to fire 4 shots without aiming and could not do it. The first photos taken in the book depository of the sniper's nest and gun found show the gun was a Mauser.
The dictabelt evidence was found to be erroneous and invalid as evidence, soundly debunked more than 40 years ago.
So much just keeps coming out
The one thing he said that I truly believe is that he couldn't look at the President's head or he would have passed out.
why did he wait so long to tell the truth
Afraid.... he's 88 now. Wants to come clean before.....
Did you not watch the video? He was not interviewed by the Warren Commission, and he never read the conclusions or books back in the day... He didn't know anything about the Magic Bullet until just a few years ago.
@@mcdemuth Thanks, I can see why they didn't interview him, I got bored after 5 mins
@@kevo212 "I got bored after 5 mins"
----------------------------------------------------------
Then you're not a person who has any interest in anything important. Go play video games.
@@kenthompson5723 i def will