Nope. I've researched this for years. It was a different time in 1963. Yes, today this would have been handled different but there is no doubt that the Warren Report was 100 percent right
The Secret Service was probably part of the conspiracy that day. When the motorcade left Love Field, one of their men was ordered off the back of JFK's limo. He can be seen, in a video, raising his arms in consternation about the unexplained decision to remove him from the standing post on the rear bumper. Also, there were supposed to be motorcycle cops riding alongside JFK on both sides of the limo,, as part of his protection. When questioned about why those officers weren't there, some Secret Service guy said JFK had asked those officers not be there so people would have a better chance to see him. But the Secret Service later admitted that JFK's attitude toward their protection strategies was always to agree with whatever security formation they wanted. So they were lying.
You said it correctly as I have also repeated in exposing the Kennedy-hating liars! What you said about JFKs protection in previous motorcades is the truth, contrasted to the deliberately stripped-down protection on Nov. 22, contrasted to Mon. Nov. 18 in Tampa, FL. Only four days later, no motorcycle cops OR S.S. agents on the vulnerable right side where JFK sat. Only motorcycle cops FAR BACK from the limo on the left side! And the S.S. car should have been leading the limo (not trailing it), so it could deliberately slow down to stay close to the limo, but not allowing it to go slower than the legal 11mph for the president at all times. In trailing, it allows the driver (William Greer) to pull too far ahead, as was the case in Dallas, and the S.S. car was too far back to give him fast attention! Yes, you pointedly demolished that phony claim by the usual Kennedy-haters that Kennedy himself somehow could "order" S.S. agents away so people on the route could see him better, and he therefore caused his own death! That is cruel, not to mention completely wrong, as the S.S. can order the President in the law passed, not the other way around. And the S.S. did admit Kennedy did agree to do what the S.S. wanted in his entire 34 months as president, in order to protect him. Suddenly, that close protection as recently as in Tampa, FL with agents riding on the rear footrests and handles for over 26-miles, exactly as should have been replicated in Dallas, was not there!
There were a number of unusual things that happened that day. The phone system went down for about half hour immediately after the assassination in Washington. Oswald did not make all these unusual things happen. This assassination was orchestrated by Israel and the Rothchilds having the CIA do the killing. Members of the FBI and Secret Service were involved also.
if you want to stop crime scene tampering why do you remove a bullet from the car and then surreptitiously put it on a stretcher without explanation. maybe it's true, and maybe he didn't have a bad intention. But bad decision.
Exactly right. It makes so little sense. And how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet for two generations of public debate on such a serious subject. No excuse for that.
@@calva221 "how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet" ------------------------------------------------------------------- It's entirely possible, given that the assassination was totally unexpected, the hospital scene was chaotic and disorderly, and given his age at the time.
@@kenthompson5723 He wasn't a child with no brain then! 28 is a full-brain developed adult. Interesting, the Founders mandated a Representative must be at least 25, exactly where psychologists say a person's brain is then fully developed and not the 21 (old) age for voting, but since 1971, only 18. Which was a cruel mistake just because men were drafted into the illegal Vietnam War at that same age, so people thought, if a man can be drafted, why can't he vote at that age? It was known then people don't have a full functioning brain developed until their 20s, so the 21 at least seemed reasonable, and far better than only as a teenager of 18! 30 is the minimum for a Senator, and 35 for the President.
Something doesn't smell right here...Landis was a trained Secret Service agent who knew better than to sheepishly slip such important evidence on to a stretcher...He would have given it to his supervisor and explained where he found it...I not only find this totally unbelievable but also find his saying he never heard or saw anything about the assassination or that bullet over the last 60 years to be laughable...Landis could have been charged with obstructing the investigation and failing to perform his duties and suffered serious consequences, so it just isn't believable that he would handle such evidence that way or no one would see him dropping that bullet on the stretcher...What rotten journalism the NBC host practices by failing to register that once Landis disproves the Magic Bullet that therefore Landis' claim that the 3 shells prove Oswald did it is invalid because the scenario now requires a 4th bullet...
What is more unbelievable - an agent grabbing a bullet under shock and duress and putting it with the President, or an agent scrubbing the crime scene with a bucket of water within 10 minutes? Well, we know the latter definitely occurred. The point is that logic did not carry the day that day. He may be telling the truth.
I agree. One has to ask why now and why such an outlandish story given all the research that's been done. It would be much more interesting to find out what he's being paid, who he's scared of...Oliver Stone will figure it out.
Where are you getting the idea he never heard or saw anything about the assassination? He never said or implies that at all. In fact he says that exact opposite. He said was he intentionally avoiding reading about it. Meaning he absolutely did see stuff about it. He just refused to read what he saw.
You can not be serious ... At 16:15 Landis says "I saw a bullet and wanted to preserve it, and make sure it did not get lost." So what does he do ?? He just lays it on a stretcher without telling a soul, having no clue who might find it, and leaves. HEY - how about giving it to Roy Kellerman the Secret Service Agent in charge that day and then showing him EXACTLY where you found it ?? Then he keeps silent about it for 60 years, even though it ends up being (somehow) found on Connally's stretcher. I 100% believe Clint Hill, who not only was the most attuned person in Dealey Plaza that day, but has been the most honest, transparent, reliable and haunted witness since Nov. 22, 1963. Clint Hill wrote a very good books about 10 years ago in which he contacted EVERY Secret Service agent on the JFK detail asking for their accounts and recollections but Landis says he was never even contacted. BS. Then Landis makes the even more ludicrous claim that he merely found the bullet QUOTE "just lying where the seam on the back seat meets the middle of the trunk, and it's uhh where they would have attached the bubbletop." So that is on TOP of the back seat. So now JFK researchers who question that the spent "magic bullet" had been likely to have fallen out of Connally's wrist and ended up on his stretcher - is going to instead try to imagine this same bullet (not pristine in any way to begin with, base is completely oval) went IN Kennedy's back but then just fell out BEHIND him. And what convenient timing for this new money-maker of a Book --- 2 months before the 60th anniversary of that horrible day.
Yeah, sorry, Landiis , but we have to be as skeptical about your story , as we ARE about the official version of the assassination . And exactly what point is all this if you yourself believe that Oswald was the lone assassin ???? I JUST DON'T GET IT !
Landis was there. You all were not. He knows what happened and what he did. You just don't like what he is saying. He had no reason to lie at 90 years old. He was a young rookie at the time and is a human being. Human beings make mistakes especially in moments of stress and shock.
@@lennon1252 Landis was 28 years old - is that merely a "mistaken young rookie" to you ? He had a SWORN duty to turn over CRITICAL evidence. You were not there either -- but you believe Landis - most of us believe Clint Hill instead. So Landis lied at 28, 38, 48, 58, 68, 78 and told the truth finally at 88. Your ever heard the term "dementia" son ? OK fine. You are entitled to think the guy waited 60 years to talk about the bullet that was the lynchpin of the case. Go buy his book - I am sure he'd love your money.
@@DanC-go9lc His age is not important. He was a rookie in the secret service. And if you search youtube Clint Hill admits in 2016 or 2014, I'm not sure if the year that Landis finally told him about the bullet he found. But he didn't say anything about it until recently. You can see it greatly affected him as he quit the service not soon after. Not everyone is cut out for that kind of work. Just imagine being 27 or any age and seeing Kennedy at Parkland with most of his head blown off. It traumatized Landis. And it's easy to be a Monday morning quarterback. Why didn't he give it to Kellerman? Kellerman and Greer sucked at their job. Greer turned around TWICE and instead of speeding up which would have saved Kennedy's life, he slowed down. And Kellerman turned around and saw Kennedy holding his throat and did nothing!
I count FIVE shots. One MISS, which caused concrete fragments to hit James Tague, one THROAT shot through the front windshield, one BACK shot which did not penetrate, a shot that hit Connelly and caused all of the damage to his body, and of course the Kennedy Head shot, which I believe originated from the front. That's five shots and that means that a conspiracy was in play that day.
You forgot the bullet that bystanders found near the manhole cover across from the GK. The bullet had dug a lengthy furrow through the grass as was pointed out by a woman bystander as seen in a photo taken. A followup photo is of a lanky man in a business suit putting the bullet in his pant pocket.
I agree, the final fatal shot was probably from the front, from the area behind the fence. A reasonable assumption would be Oswald's' first shot went wild and chipped the curb. The second, might have hit the president's neck, and left a small exit wound, see recent interview with the young doctor who was standing facing Kennedy on the exam table. The third hit Connally, going through bone, and would have been in bad shape. The two mushroom bullet fragments on the back seat came from where? Were these from Connally and picked up and placed on the rear seat? My question is the Carcano rifle has a 4-round magazine, only 3 rounds appear to have been fired. Why didn't Oswald, or the shooter fire a 4th shot? Audio witnesses tend to confirm the last 2 shots came close together, indicating multiple shooters. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots to mask the sound of another shooter(s), possibly from the front? Did this pristine bullet he mention fall out from Kennedy's neck or was it placed there in the confusion during the ride to the hospital.? Lots of questions here.
Most witnesses heard 3 shots. Windshield is still in the national archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. It's completely implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
This story just does not add up: a Secret Service Agent with a bullet with rifling marks does not responsibly hold on to the bullet and turn it in to proper chain of command authority? Anyone with training in police work would know the rifling (striping?) would most definitely tie the bullet to whatever gun fired it. An essential piece of evidence that should have been tagged and identified with the time and location where it was found and the name of the person who found it and turned it in. Better yet, the bullet should have been left where it was located on the limousine, for fingerprinting, (and today DNA testing), as well as ballistic trajectory analysis. Of course in 1963, he did not have a mobile phone to call for backup to cordon off the limousine from the surging crowd at Parkland Hospital, so maybe it makes sense that he would pick up belongings and evidence that might otherwise have disappeared. Furthermore, the bullet as seen in the Exhibit photo does not in any way appear deformed from impact, . . . which raises all kinds of questions. And then, why did Agent Landis not pick up the “2 bright brass bullet fragments” (8:59) “on the seat,” "one of them, like my pinky finger, it was kind of mushroomed", . . . IN ADDITION to the "intact, . . . fully . . ., bullet," (9:14) seen "where the cushioning met the trunk of the car" that he did pick up, put in his pocket, and later placed on the gurney? So, according to this eyewitness, there were at least 2 bullets, which the NBC moderator did not acknowledge. Like everything in the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and years that followed, the Kennedy Assassination was a whirlwind of confusion, cacophony, and unreliable investigation.
Bill Cooper showed missing footage. The DRIVER shot Kennedy. Skull & Bones Secret Society(Bush). Notice Jackie holding RED ROSES(death) and right afterward YELLOW ROSES(friendship) were scattered over the backseat. UNREAL that SPELLS Sheeple cant seem to see. Its also the 33 parallel. Same with 911. Totally Masonic number.
DRIVER shot Kennedy. Bill Cooper showed the footage. Skull & Bones(BUSH) arranged it.... Bill Cooper was murdered. A fake alien attack planned with very realistic holograms. Like 911 holograms were used. Our government works for the bankers not the people.
Exactly. This is just another book sales tour all this has been explained by forensic ballistic experts. I can only assume they are trying to appeal to a different generation again.
Why wouldn't you come forwards with this longs agoes ,???? Not coming forwards with makes him part of it ECT.with his silence . Now's he's tampering s with evidence .So he's has toos plays alongs the storyline s that beens told s !!.or possibly jails times !! !!Now's sell sells his books ECT. Perhaps! He waited longs enough tells his story as he knows inter fearances ofs crime comes with prison s times as bigs fine .
He’s just stating he believes the facts in the case. He heard 3 shots and 3 cartridges were found on the 6th floor by the open window. Also, workers on the floor below testified that they not only heard 3 shots, but they heard the cartridges hit the floor directly above them.
There was no "coup." That's an overly dramatic and inaccurate term to use here. It was a smooth transition of power as provided by the Constitution, from President to Vice President.
My spiddy senses are tingling listening to this guy. Lets see if I got this right, he takes it upon himself to tamper with evidence at a crime scene (the bullet). He says he's concerned about the safety of the bullet (getting lost) yet he leaves it on the presidents gurney unattended and doesn't report to anybody what he did?!? And what's up with the cigarette lighter he also removes from the crime scene, finder's keepers?!? Nope, something is not right with this guy in my humble opinion.
Exact same phrase I used years ago, like 10 years ago, or so, when the other guy was interviewed along with him, I don't even have to watch 1 sec of this to know who it is, it's one of the two that they've been interviewing for years. Also did you not notice that, the fatal shot, ONLY comes when he stops in the street ?? He comes down to nearly a full stop, the fatal shot hits the front/side of this head, and then they drive off with him dead. Did you notice ?
It could not be possible for the bullet to make a hole in Kennedy's back and then fall back to that location with no evidence of any material on it. If it actually was there and Pauls story is true then it would make more sense for it to be a plant by someone else who wanted a bullet with the Carcano marks on it to be found. Maybe Clint put it there? :)
@@dwaynegamble244 Once again (for those who missed the lesson), it doesn't matter what kind of rifle or number of shots. Firearms experts for both the WC and the HSCA proved that it was, in fact, Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that fired three bullets in Dealey Plaza, two of which struck the President. There is no evidence of anyone else owning or firing it. To insinuate (w/p evidence) that it was someone else is a trick that never works.
Once again (for those who missed the lesson), it doesn't matter what kind of rifle or number of shots. Firearms experts for both the WC and the HSCA proved that it was, in fact, Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that fired three bullets in Dealey Plaza, two of which struck the President. There is no evidence of anyone else owning or firing it. To insinuate (w/o evidence) that it was someone else is a trick that never works.
I'm sorry for being so graphic, I don't buy the one shooter theory. I'm an experienced hunter and I've never seen an animals organs or tissues blow backwards when it was shot. The President's brain, if shot from the rear, would have splattered all over Governor Connally and his wife, not all over the rear of the limo. Mrs. Kennedy was seen and has stated that she crawled up on the rear of the limo to retrieve pieces of her husbands' brain. That shot had to have been from the front, thus proving there were at least two shooters. The bullet that was found by the Presidents' side, if it had been any of the bullets that struck either The President or governor Connally would have been deformed by the impact, which is what bullets are designed to do. I'm sorry, but the evidence screams conspiracy/cover-up.
You're not accounting for the speed of the car and wind speed. The limousine was traveling approximately 11 mph into a 15 mph wind with gusts up to 20 mph. Matter from JFKs head also exploded upwards and outwards in all directions. The wind gusts blew much of that matter, which was relatively light in weight, backwards as the car was moving forward. Furthermore, there was blood splatters on Connally and his wife, as well as, forensically and directionally appropriate blood splatters forward of Kennedy within the limousine. There has been a great deal of testing to recreate that tragic moment and the subsequent debris field and it has been resolved. Shots came from high and the rear. Secondly, the bullet was deformed on the side. The bullet exited JFKs neck(all soft tissue) and began tumbling, leaving an oval entry wound in Connally's back. It then shattered the fifth rib, exited the governor's chest, broke his wrist, and then partially embedded in the governor's leg. The key points here are that the bullet was no longer traveling in a straight line and was losing speed. The tip of the bullet wasn't deformed because it didn't come into direct contact with bone, it was the side of the bullet that absorbed much of the impact at lower velocity
Well...remember, that he left the Secret just a few months after this shooting...and his resume of jobs afterwards point to a guy who was, shall we say, not the brightest bulb in the chandelier!!! Back then, the standards for Secret Service job...and even standards for police work...were quite low...also, the pay was not so good back in the day.
This man's statement that he believes it was Oswald, acting alone, could simply be fear. In the weeks after the assassination, people in Dallas became aware that some of those who had a piece of information that contradicted the official story of it being the "lone nut" Oswald were being found dead, their deaths poorly staged as suicides, but looking like murders in reality. In the next 15 years, many people who knew things about the assassination that didn't go along with the government's version died under "mysterious" circumstances. It's possible that he waited all these years to tell his story for the same reason.
curbozerboomer. the deaths all happened under very unusual circumstances. none have been explained as due to circumstance. you need to read Richard Belzer's book "Hit List" and not all those CIA approved and directed books.
@Miranda - I don't believe for one second took 'that" of piece of evidence and laid it near the Presidents foot "figuring" the M.E. would find it, That is absurd, It could have rolled off the gurney when they moved it. Someone, for whatever reason, could have taken it. He "should" have slipped it into his pocket, and he knew that was evidence, you tell no one about it, put it next to the dead Presidents feet who was just assassinated and that's how you safeguard an important piece of evidence? Why didn't he easily slip it into his pocket where it would have been well safeguarded. After he spoke about this whole story, I call b.s. on it and would NEVER believe a single word out of his mouth. What he was saying is totally ridiculous. I think we know "who" was happy about this pre-planned assassination and who carried it out. And that's all I'm going to say about it.
I think...if this happened at all...Landis just made an impulsive decision, and then realized he had made a real booboo!...so he left it where someone else would find it. I doubt if this story is true.
It was also the day that America died for me . The assassination changed everything in America for the worst & has never recovered . Now that is the shame of it .
@patrickyoung3503 why? JFK might have been good looking and a good speaker but as far as policy, he was terrible. Plus, it's not like he won fairly. Bottom line, sure it's a tragedy but as far as president's, he sucked
From Landis’ Official Report Submitted on November 27, 1963: As the Motorcade passed the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) “None of the windows were open, and I did not see anyone standing by them.” [Numerous windows were open and people were visible in many of them.] “The President's car and the Follow-up car had just completed their turns and both were straightening out [on Elm Street].” “At this moment I heard what sounded like the report of a high-powered rifle from behind me, over my right shoulder. When I heard the sound there was no question in my mind what it was.” [Surely the Warren Commission would want to hear every word Landis had to say.] “I did not realize that President Kennedy had been shot at this point.” “It was at this moment that I heard a second report and saw the President's head split open and pieces of flesh and blood flying through the air.” “President slumped out of sight towards Mrs. Kennedy.” “My reaction at this time was that the shot came from somewhere towards the front, right-hand side of the road.” [That area would include the Triple Underpass and the Grassy Knoll. The Warren Commission immediately lost interest in Landis because they did not want to hear a single word about a shot coming from the front or the right.] “I did not notice anyone on the overpass, and I scanned the area to the right of and below the overpass where the terrain sloped towards the road on which we were traveling.” [Landis did not look to the TSBD following the head shot, he looked to the Grassy Knoll.] “I do not recall hearing a third shot.” When the Motorcade arrived at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Landis said “Mrs. Kennedy's purse and hat and a cigarette lighter were on the back seat. I picked these three items up as I walked through the car and followed Mrs. Kennedy into the hospital.” A purse! A hat!! A cigarette lighter!!! Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!! Not one word about bullet fragments!!!!! Not one word about placing the pristine bullet on President Kennedy’s gurney!!!!!! Landis’ 60th Anniversary memory improvement is too little, too late, and unbelievable!!!!!!!
The official report to whom? Secret Service? The Warren Commission was two days away from being formed (Nov. 29th 1963) so a Nov 27th report could not have been WC testimony. Please furnish your source.
''Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!!''--------------------------Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah Why ?Hahahahahahahahahah Mistery?Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha Enigma? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaa
I am hard pressed to imagine how a bullet fired from a gun could possibly come to a stop without deformation. I have enough familiarity with ballistics to realize that really cannot happen. A bullet hitting a down ski jacket will deform. The velocity is just so great and the bullet is designed to deform. Thats why its made of lead. (The guy said brass but he was mistaken - bullets are lead with copper jackets) I don’t bring this up to cast doubt on this guys story but rather to just clarify the fact that bullets don’t just stop without deforming. And they deform a lot. So assuming this story is truthful - what could that tell us?
I did not mention it as not sure if I was correct but you confirmed the "Oswald bullets" were copper jacketed over the lead core. That's why they don't disintegrate (frangible or disintegrating) bullets that spewed hundreds of tiny pieces in Kennedy's skull. That also by itself destroys the myth, and Paul Landis inadvertent saying he found TWO tiny bullet fragments, right there destroys his own conclusion in still defending the massively discredited WC Report, although he doesn't realize what he is saying in the conclusion of finding the fragments, and where he found them. Not where Connally was, but where Jackie was, after he fell into where she was sitting. How ironic, that Paul Landis may get the crooked MSM to finally acknowledge their cover-up (the NY Times is one letting its guard down a little more now!) and allowing the government narrative control them. And if not most of the MSM, then many people will figure out they were lied to by the government-media axis after 60 years of denying it was nobody else by Oswald!
Oswalds bullets were "military jacketed" bullets, designed to go right through soldiers on the battlefield, limiting somewhat their internal injuries. remember, the rifle used was a WW2 surplus rifle, of Italian origin. It cost Oswald around $ 13 dollars!
@@curbozerboomer1773 Good Point. What we call Full Metal Jacket bullets May pass through without major deformation. I’m still a little doubtful but… it’s a fair point. The gun itself makes no difference. After all a guns job is simply to hit the back of the bullet with a firing pin. So an AR-15 is really no different from an old WW2 rifle except perhaps with regard to accuracy.
Hmmm, seems pretty strange. What about HIS fingerprints on this bullet? The only other remote explanation is this might have been the 3rd bullet no one could find from 3 shots. However, for a highly-trained secret service agent to tamper with evidence and then remain silent just doesn't add up.
It was the president, but what a horrible event for any who were involved. To witness the utter violence of seeing any human being being shot, especially a head wound like that, never leaves you, never. You will see it for the rest of your life. May that man have peace. There is probably not a day that goes by that he doesnt think of it. Things like that never leave your mind, never.
I worked in a hospital in the mid 1980’s. A 14 year old boy was flown in who had suffered a shotgun wound to the face and head. Trust me. You don’t forget it.
I agree. It doesn't make any sense he would put the bullet on the gurney. I can see why he'd want to pick it up to make sure someone didn't take it with all the melee going on but, why wouldn't he show it to other SS agents, or the police or some other authority? Why did he stay silent? Maybe he was told by the CIA to keep his mouth shut... who knows.
I am writing this from memory, without referring to any books on the assassination. It has long been thought that the pristine bullet either worked its way out of the president's back when the doctors in the trauma room were trying to save the president's life, or else it was placed on the stretcher by somebody (which led to theories that the bullet was planted in order to frame Oswald). My recollection is that witnesses said it was found on Kennedy's stretcher and not Connally's stretcher, which has always been one of the difficulties with the single bullet theory, the other being, of course, that a nearly pristine bullet could not have done all that damage to two bodies. One of the doctors at Parkland Hospital probed with his finger the wound in Kennedy's back and found it to be only three inches deep, which suggests that the bullet struck him at a low velocity. If I recall correctly, this was a not uncommon defect with a Mannlicher Carcano rifle. Given the Secret Service agent's account of where he found the bullet, this all makes sense. And it is consistent with the long standing criticism that Kennedy's throat wound could not have been caused by the same bullet that entered his back because: (1) the throat wound was several inches higher than the back wound; (2) the president was sitting upright when he was struck in the throat as the Zapruder film clearly shows; and (3) the back wound was not a through wound. The conclusion is almost inescapable that the throat wound was caused by a bullet fired from the front. Its dimensions have never been described because it was obliterated by the tracheotomy, so it was never identified as an entrance wound or an exit wound. This leaves us with five bullets: one that missed the limousine altogether, one that struck Kennedy in the back, one that struck Kennedy in the throat, one that did all the damage to Connally, and one that hit Kennedy in the head. Some of the witnesses said they heard three shots, others said they heard four or five. Given the rapid sequence of the shots, the echoes in Dealey Plaza, and the differing locations of the witnesses, it is no wonder that accounts differ. In defense of the Secret Service agent, he was wise to protect the evidence without turning it over to the Dallas police. Granted, it would have been better if the bullet could have remained where it was found until the car was photographed as a crime scene, but it was not in his power to make that happen. His concern about souvenir hunters was not unreasonable. If he is telling the truth, I thank him for coming forward. -- Richard Hayes Phillips
I agree with the bullet coming back out of Kennedy's back , it is possible that 9 shots were fired plan A at the intersection turning into the plaza where the limo went wide ( Greer ) panicked the first volley occured .
I disagree about one thing. The ER doctors have made it clear that the neck wound was an entrance wound and it was the exit wound from that bullet that blew out most of the president's brain from the right back of his head. This would mean there was someone firing from the front, either from the grassy knoll or the overpass. It was not Oswald (or anyone else) firing only from the back.
Although the bullet could have been under-powered, another possibility is that it struck Kennedy just below the top of the steel and leather brace he was wearing. The brace was described by the chief doctor in Trauma Room 1 who described how it curved up in the back from under the arms. This would have acted like a bullet proof vest and could have prevented the bullet from penetrating more that the few inches described by the examining doctors. The brace could account for the bullet's relatively pristine condition, especially if the leather part of the brace bore the brunt of the bullet's force. This theory could be verified or refuted by an examination of the back brace if it is preserved somewhere.
It's been tried, 3 aimed shots and it's an impossibility. Oswald was a distraction and a patsy. Kennedy was shot from the grassy knoll and the over pass.
Exactly cause it was way too early in the so-called investigation to come to that conclusion. The lone assassin bs was regurgitated for a reason and we all know it deep down
Oswald had nothing to do with.He was killed because of Dimona. JFK didnt want to stop monitor Dimona because he didnt want them to have a nuclear arsenal.
This doesn't seem credible. A trained secret service agent, with important crime scene evidence but doesn't even inform his superiors, really? However, I always thought the stretcher bullet came from Kennedy's back, and this confirms it. Also, in the interview he says 'I heard the first shot, then a second shot closely followed by a third'. Why doesn't the interviewer ask how close together were 2nd and 3rd shots? This is absolutely crucial to the case. If the shots were very close together - some witnesses said they were almost on top of each other - then there had to be two shooters, because it's impossible to reload and fire that quickly. Two shooters equals conspiracy...
The retired agents story just does not make sense to me . After almost 60 years he comes forward and says he moved the bullet from the Kennedy car to a gurney . I also wonder about shots 2 and 3 being so close together . I remember NBC reporter Robin MacNeil was on the scene in Dallas . He also mentioned that shots 2 and 3 were so close . The other thing that bothers me is none of the several reporters went back to Parkland the next day . I would have thought they might interview the emergency dept staff .
Yeah, many witnesses describe the 2nd and 3rd shots as being very close to one another. Their testimony was either altered or ignored altogether by the Warren report.@@larrysproul9424
I agree, an important detail glossed over by many. Also, an important piece of evidence not mentioned in the WC report. The last 2 shots being almost on top of each other indicates multiple shooters. These were probably the 3rd and 4th shots, not the 2nd and 3rd. His memory might be confusing the last 2 as one, a possibility in the echo chamber of Daley Plaza and the passage of time. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots that would mask the sound of another shooter? Why didn't he fire a 4th shot? the Carcano rifle had a 4-round magazine. Was Oswald aware of other shooters or was he led to believe he was going to be the hero and then only put the pieces together when he said he was a patsy? This is a carefully rehearsed statement about the 3 shots and his general agreement with the official report. Many questions here after he could have tampered with evidence and did not protect the crime scene or notify his superiors of his actions.
Only a few witnesses actually mentioned the last two shots being clos together...The consensus is, that Dealey Plaza was subject to lots of echo...this was proven by subsequent rifles being shot, as an experiment. Three shots only...and Oswald actually had over 8 seconds to shoot the 2nd and 3rd shots...he obviously got more accurate with each shot!
Doesn't make sense. If there were lots of echo you would hear multiple sounds surely? An echo on first shot, echo on 2nd shot, echo on 3rd shot - multiple echos. But that's not what people said they heard...@@curbozerboomer1773
One of the most important principals of police work is continuity of evidence. From the time it is first secured, it must be documented to whom it is transferred every time it is transferred.
First, thanks S/A Landis for your service to our country. Second, some time before he died in 1997, didn't S/A Sam Kinney state that it was he who put the bullet on the gurney? Does this mean that two bullets were found and left (without tagging as evidence) on two different gurneys, or are two agents taking credit for the same act? The upcoming book may be an interesting read, but I'm curious as to who funded the project. Which companies contributed? And of course, at 4:23, if a bullet rolled from JFK's gurney to Gov. Connally's, without hitting the floor, then it truly was a magic bullet indeed.
You are correct regarding Sam Kinney. During a TV interview he revealed that he put a bullet from the limo onto a stretcher in Parkland. He didn't say "Why" he didn't turn it in to his USSS supervisor and he didn't describe the bullet itself. Unsurprisingly, this statement was "cut" from the broadcast. Kinney wasn't pleased by this... The orderly that actually found the stretcher bullet turned it over to the hospital head of Security. Both stated unequivocally that CE399 was "not" the bullet found on the stretcher. The third person who had custody of the bullet stated that he could not identify CE399 as the bullet he was given. The bullets further chain of custody is contradictory and cannot be determined. Paul Landis (apparently) didn't mention whether CE399 was or was not the bullet that he put on the stretcher. His reason for leaving it on the stretcher (he didn't want it to get "lost") doesn't explain why he removed evidence from a crime scene, showed it to no other SS agent at the crime scene, and did not turn it in to his supervisor. Although not explicitly stated, he told no one that he left the bullet on the stretcher. He had to know that by moving the bullet to the stretcher it would effect any proper analysis of the crime, yet he never revealed his actions to the SS. His actions are inexplicable - unless of course he was protecting this evidence from the Secret Service itself, because he firmly believed that they would "lose" it. What did he know - - that convinced him he couldn't trust SS???
@@thomasneal4775 Listen to the interview. He said his motivation for removing the bullet was that all kinds of people were converging on the car and he wanted to preserve the evidence. Not saying it is true or not true but that is what he says in this interview.
What you say is true and I am aware. Read my reply. I go on to state that he gives no explanation as to why he leaves the limo bullet on the stretcher, nor why he tells no one that he did it! This is unquestionably a case of altering the crime scene, which presents false evidence to any investigation. Obviously, he should have turned the bullet in to SS, but elected NOT to do this. The only explanation is he didn't trust them with the evidence. To be certain, only minutes after the shooting, that the bullet was unsafe with SS we must ask the question, "What did he know prior to the shooting, or what did he see during the shooting?" Additionally, how did a "pristine" (as Landis states) bullet enter JFK's back, bounce off, or fall out and end up on top of the back of JFK's seat? Given your statement regarding the large number of people around the limo at the time, anyone of them could have placed it there as easily as Landis placed the bullet on the stretcher.
At 9:00 minutes in he says he found "bullet fragments". One was the size of the end of his pinky and mushroomed and he doesn't mention the other of the "two shiny fragments". THEN he found the intact bullet above the seat. Those fragments were forensic evidence. I have never heard that any fragments were found in the limo, and I have written a movie and an upcoming book on this. The limo was a crime scene. Today we know of CSI or CSU, but homicide detectives for decades preserved, photographed, and documented things like fragments and blood splatter as important in determining the direction of a bullet. The direction of the bullet is at the center of the whole 60 years of conspiracy madness. I find it hard to believe that SS agents were not, at minimum, aware of crime scene procedure. There are eyewitness accounts of them scrubbing down the back seat right outside Parkland Hospital. Destroying blood splatter forensics. Also if the bullet was on the back ledge of the limo, then it never entered the limo. (Although a sub-sonic bullet, meeting any object would have either dug in or bounced off, Kennedy had a back brace. Maybe the bullet glanced off that,) but the kinetic energy of a projectile traveling like a bullet pushes the bounds of physics to suggest that it just stopped cold and fell onto the open rear deck of the limo which had just sped down the Stemmons Freeway at 80-90 miles an hour taking turns and stopping with a lurch. For these and a few other reasons, to my way of thinking, this does not line up with reality. - Tom Avitabile, author of Ask Not!
You are CORRECT !!! Cyril Wecht has explained that bullets LODGE in a victim and NEVER fall out !! Witnesses before the ARRB described Dr. Humes ALTERING JFK's wounds in a Bethesda morgue room BEFORE the official autopsy at 8pm !! One witness saw autopsy doctor Humes take a BONE SAW to JFK's skull !!! Humes REMOVED the back bullet, the throat bullet, and mutilated the head before the autopsy !! C.E. 399 was a PLANTED bullet meant to link to the depository rifle....which was NOT even the rifle Oswald was photographed with !!!
The cover up started immediately after the last bullit was fired , the official story was just three shots fired , if mr Teague hadn’t been hit with a piece of flying debris , then they wouldn’t have had to come up with the Magic bullit theory . Sounds like three bullits found on that back seat of the limousine fragments , mushroom , and intacked pristine. New evidence for a book just before the 60 anniversary of the assassination me thinks !
Exactly, @HeyDuffy459. It makes no sense. I think he might just be a confused old man. Also: If CE 399 didn't exit through Kennedy's neck from behind -- if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none.
@@calva221" if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There would be no exit wound if the bullet used was a frangible (exploding) bullet.
I would like to see if he was interviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990's and what was recorded? The fact that the "Super" Secret Service when instructed by the ARRB not to destroy records did in fact destroy records speaks volumes about what they were hiding. Also the fact that the two Naval doctors at the Bethesda autopsy never performed a gunshot autopsy, then burned or lost their original autopsy reports is troubling. These doctors reported the back wound was shallow with no projectile found, yet world renown pathologist, Dr. Cyril Wecht states bullets do not "back out" of wounds. And add in the fact that in the Warren commission final report, then Congressman Gerald Ford moved the back wound up several inches to fit the single bullet theory. Now add this into the narrative is to muddy up the waters further while President Biden refused to release the remaining Assassination Records. Imagine that?
Hmm, strange Oswald's military records are "missing" also. Key evidence has this way of being missing. If Oswald was the lone assassin then there would be no need for any of this to happen.
I believe it is , and this wasn't just an ordinary crime. ...The JFK assassination has been labelled " THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY " Now, the question is , is there a statute of limitations on the crime of the century ? If there is not , Mr. Landis might be in some trouble .
Question not asked: Why did Landis believe he needed to tamper with (i.e., move and deposit elsewhere) such critically important evidence? Did he believe it would disappear if he left it where he first observed it? If so, why did he believe that? If not, Landis’ actions and statements demonstrate extremely shoddy safeguarding of crime scene evidence. Negligence and mishandling of evidence to that extent is more consistent with 1863 than 1963. Second question not asked: Why did Landis transplant the intact bullet but not the fragment? Mr. Landis, you condemned yourself with your own words. If what you say is true you have committed a great disservice to your oath, your agency and your country!
Those secret service people have a lot to account for ... where were they? ... even the Secret Service detail were perplexed by the absence of surround officers ... they weren't there ... even one of them only 3 minutes before had his hands in the air as if to say what is going on ??? You tell me ... a secret service detail who were conveniently absent at the time of impact !!!
They were exactly as close as they could have been without being on the car. And they were not on the car because JFK ordered that they not be on the car. Try to accept this fact.
@@calva221 It's not that don't or won't accept anything. Was simply unaware that Kennedy would order that. Non-sensical order, if you ask me, and I had years of U.S.ARMY training, and never heard an order on the level of that one. 🤔🤔🤨
@@ThisIS_Insane Sorry, I always think everyone knows what I know and CHOOSE to disregard it. Kennedy did tell the agents he didn't want them there because he believed they came between him and the people. One of his quotes on the subject was, while riding in a motorcade in Florida before Dallas: "Keep those Ivy league charlatans off the limo". Some try to dispute this but Clint Hill among other agents, like Jerry Blaine, say it's true and that's good enough for me.
@@calva221 they were hungover from to much moonshine the night before, and Vince Palamara in his book long ago demolished the myth that JFK ordered it.
Jim Garrison was how Oliver Stone knew. Let's not forget that. Garrison's investigation was brilliant and courageous. He paid a heavy price as he was a victim of character assassination by the FBI, the CIA, and our news media. Oliver Stone did an excellent job of bringing Jim Garrison's investigation to public view.
this guy himself looks suspicious too. why did he pick up the bullet, put it in his pocket then throw it on to the gurney?Even a rookie cop does not do this.
This is ridiculous. "ok, we better not lose this important piece of evidence so I will just lay here on the gurney and walk away. Nothing will happen to it."
This makes no sense..he would have been trained to report evidence where found ...US Secret Service is very strict in their training and was even then...
Getting a call at 10pm and a strange crackly voice tells you that they were enjoying watching your grandaughter in the playground could be very persuasive.
It makes absolutely no sense that a secret service agent would pick up a bullet and pick it up and put in his pocket....without turning it over to Dallas Police. That bullet was part of a crime scene. Putting it on a gurney was just stupid. Anything could have happened to it. Also, shortly after the president was brought in to parkland, someone was dispatched to clean up the back seat of the limousine with a rag and a mop of water. This is madness! That was a crime scene. The location of blood and brain tells a lot about bullet trajectories.
I thought the Secret Service was smarter than this, I was wrong. 😮 He kept this to himself all these years and now he wants to sell a book. That's some integrity there.
What is in the back of every researcher's mind into the Kennedy Assination is that if Paul Landis' account is 100% accurate, it brings up the annoying possible explanation that the bullet had been already discreetly placed there to embelish the story of a lone assasin, before Kennedy was even in the limosine and in the motorcade. It was planted there before the assasination.
the Kennedy's would have noticed. the implication is that the bullet was planted as the car was en route to parkland. which is Why Hill jumped at the publicizing of this information.
@@TvDaddyAndTheTabloidArmy GGGGGGGGGGGreat to hear from you. Of course, you're right if it was out in the open security would have spotted it, unless it was tucking in a crease. What is obvious to me though, is that the story doesn't add up about the bullet being spent and only sticking in Kennedy's back because it was out of force. It was shot into something soft to have been so pristine and also it had no blood on it. The sniper on the grassy knoll was James Files---he admitted using a Remington Fireball with hollow points. He was aiming for the left eye when Kennedy jerked and so he hit him in the right temple. The thing we have to look out for is information that comes but there is no way to prove it. Even Files testimony has been called out, but Files named people who were seen at Dealey Plaza---and who would admit to killing Kennedy? The biggest blooper of the whole affair to me was when George H. W. Bush was asked by a reporter at a press conference where he was on 22 November, 1963. He said he didn't remember! The funny thing is there is a picture of him on the internet at Dealey Plaza on 22 November, 1963.
JFK died instantly after he was struck by a "special" round fired by James E Files from behind the picket fence. He used a Remington Fireball long pistol with telescopic sight, the special round had the tip drilled out and was filled with mercury which was responsible for the massive wound on the right side of JFKs head. Files was a hitman for the mob in Chicago, he worked for Charles Nicoletti who fired the shot from the Daltex building which struck Kennedy on the upper left of his back, it did not come out of his neck, the first shot hit him in the throat from the front, hence the bullet hole in the windscreen.
James Files' claims: a) He was palling around with Oswald in New Orleans in 1961. Oswald, of course, was in Minsk in 1961. b) He was present at a Dallas meeting the morning of the assassination where it was discussed how the parade route had been changed. The parade route was never changed. c) He was a knoll assassin. Phone records demonstrate Files was in Chicago during the assassination. Confronted with this, he tried to claim he was being confused with his own non-existent twin brother. No wonder NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown after they took a closer look at him.
What makes it ironic is that I found a life magazine from December 1963 at my thrift store today… And JFK and Jackie 70th wedding anniversary is today…
Hire a hitman. Hire a hitman for the hitman. The plot of every episode of The Untouchables. How anybody thinks it wasn't a Mafia hit is beyond me. They got Bobby too! Dorothy Kilgallen figured out their scheme and they hit her as well.
We know how this works from Hollywood movies. A professional hit is always done using a shooter and a backup man. See "Bullett" and "The seven Ups". There are other examples out there as well.
If Kilgallen had any info that was going to blow any plot she was sure in no hurry to do anything with any of it. The HSCA investigated her death and found no evidence of foul play.
@@trusso11783 But the hard evidence of never on the 6th floor, no nitrate gunshot residue in the test that day, etc., contradicts Landis on many points!
This explains even more: the windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. The idea somebody was trying to frame this on Oswald from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), in plain line of sight of everybody in the motorcade, firing through glass (!) and shooting Kennedy in the face is laughable.
Except he said he believed that Oswald acted alone based on the 3 shots he heard and the 3 spent cartridges found in the school book depository. The bullet possibly fell off of Governor Connally as they pulled and tugged and lifted him out of the jump seat in front of the President.
I haven't watched this yet but i assume they are finally going to admit that the 3rd bullet was accidentally fired from an armourlite rifle in the secret service car travelling behind
It's interesting you say that, because I know a former senior police officer in the UK (Chief Superintendent level), and after he retired he did his own investigation. I asked him, "Was Kennedy shot from two different directions?", and he said pretty much what you said. "He was shot from three directions. The third was an accidental discharge from security people from behind"
Nope...that book, "Mortal Error" was debunked, based on actual ballistics--and by film! many years ago, in fact--the supposed SS agent who accidentally fired his AR 15 weapon, sued the authors of the book, and won a large sum of money..His name was George Hickey.
How much stock should we put into the memory of someone in their 80s from an event that took place 60 years ago? Most people his age can not remember what they did the pervious week.
It would be a clear and direct shot for Oswald. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle. A man who could have plausibly been Oswald was seen in the window. No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the crime scene. Oswald lied about his whereabouts during the shooting. Oswald just shrugged a hollow and rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@narancauk Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook. Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away.
@@aaronz7056 ''Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle ''.--------Smuggled .For whom????Do you know how long take to assemble a rifle especially with co workers walking around? You should try. Hahahahahahahahahaha
Why is this agent coming forward 60 years later?? To sell a book and make money. And how can you get people interested in a book if you are just going to repeat the same written statements you provided in the days after the assassination?? You change the story - offer up a new version - which is sure to get media attention (like it now has) and peak people's curiosity so they will buy your book. DISGUSTING.
There's a very simple explanation to this story. First, there's no way this is the bullet that struck Kennedy's head, and there's no way the one that went through his throat ended up falling on the seat immediately after leaving Kennedy's body. However, the most likely explanation is that it's the bullet that went through both men, and fell on the seat when they removed Connally's injured body from the vehicle. The jump seat was right there close to Kennedy's seat. BTW - the term "magic bullet" was coined before it was generally known that the jump seat was inboard of where Kennedy was sitting... Initially it was believed that Connally sat exactly in front of Kennedy, making it such that the bullet would have had to turn a corner to enter Connally's body. But he was not sitting precisely in front of Kennedy - he was slightly inboard from him.
Thank you for your honestly and logical understanding of what likely happened. Unfortunately honesty and logic don’t sell books. You won’t get many “likes” with your position, but rest assured that you’re right. I just heard a refreshing interview (about this agent’s claims) with Gerald Posner, who wrote “Case Closed”, in my mind the definitive book on the JFK assassination.
@@dickhsv Agreed. All of those conspiracy books have been written to rake in the money. Even Oliver Stone ignores the fact that the jump seats were inboard so he can sell more copies of the JFK movie. All of the evidence points towards 3 shots fired from the Texas School Book Depository, including the Zapruder film. If you look at it frame by frame, the frame in which Kennedy is shot shows his head moving FORWARD, and the majority of brain and bone matter flying off in front of him.
Posner’s was the absolute worst book I read about the assassination. Read books authored by Charles Crenshaw (one of the ER doctors that operated on JFK) and you will understand why Posner was WAY off base.
If it wasn't for the motorcycle cops mike being left on, and the eyewitness that was struck by curb fragments, they would not have altered their 3 shot theory. They took an identical rifle, placed it in a vice, and tried to fire 4 shots without aiming and could not do it. The first photos taken in the book depository of the sniper's nest and gun found show the gun was a Mauser.
4:00 How can the media present this with a straight face? Even back then, there was protocol for a crime scene. Even then, it would have been COMPLETELY unacceptable for him to just "grab it".
UPDATE: In a separate solo interview James Robenalt further explains his belief that the Bullet was undercharged (he claims that was not uncommon for the Manlicher Carcano) and being undercharged did not have the energy to go through the president but instead lodged in Kennedy's back (sticking out) Jackie comforting the president may have snagged the bullet and possibly it fell onto the back deck when she crawled over the rear of the limo. Highly plausible explanation of how it got on the rear ledge and wasn't deformed as a fully charged bullet would have been. Still doesn't explain the two shiny fragments. Or Landis not securing the crime scene (his primary protectee was Jackie so he was solely focused on her) but he could have commandeered someone (DPD or even a civilian to guard the car - maybe) This rationale has elevated my initial impression of Robenalt.
If 'undercharged' the muzzle pressure would have been greatly reduced and therefore it, being one of the audible shots, would have sounded different than the other "two" shots .. I see no research on the audio characteristics of a low pressure shot .. moreover, if a person, or group of persons, planned something as huge and horrible as this event, one would imagine they'd not be stupid and use cheap-o military ammo .. which is usually ball ammo ... American's know it's all a big sham. What will they do about it? Nothing. Of course.
@@DonMillerCET Don, I agree with everything you said here. One interesting wrinkle. Landis at first said he heard only two shots. (Later he said 3). If out of the 3 shots one was undercharged would that have resulted in a lower audio profile so he only heard the two fully charged while riding on the running board of the second car, so close to a cheering crowd? I’m not a advocating that, just wondering.
It's understandable as to why Landis had fear regarding his action/ account. Everyone who posed a possible serious challenge to the narrative (for quite some time), ended up dead.
The book : HIT LIST, by the late actor, comedian (& intellectual)- Richard Beltzer, is a sad, but compelling synopsis of all the deaths surrounding the JFK association.
Mr. Landis expressed his intention to preserve the evidence, yet he later stated that he left it on the hospital bed next to JFK's feet. This contradiction seems highly implausible.
That's what a Pathologist from Pgh, Pa. Cyril Wecht that examined JFK at Walter Reed and said he was hit from the front. He said they botched the skull and stitches were in place.
So let me get this straight, a trained Secret Service person found evidence in the back of JFK's car and took that evidence and put it on the gurney of of JFK and didn't publicly talk about it for 60 years? Absolutely amazing to bring this up on the 60th year anniversary and wrote a book. What a coincidence. "No one asked me about it" ridiculous. He's trying to sell a book and make some money.
I wonder if Landis would care to speculate what sort of calibre round would be fired at a distance of 60-100 yards and yet would only have the power or force to penetrate about an inch of flesh in Kennedy’s back and then fall in to the back seat in a pristine condition. This man is mistaken.
A full-metal copper-jacketed bullet could, if its powder wasn't fully ignited, not go at the usual 2,000 ft/sec (approx. rifle round) velocity, and therefore, may not penetrate the body deeply after going through his suit jacket, and shirt before hitting his skin. The County Records building (behind and South of TSBD) added more distance, giving credence to where some say a hidden rifleman fired, hitting Kennedy in his MID-BACK, not the 'neck' area. If under-powered, it would then only go into him an inch or two, able to fall out with only minimal damage to it.
@@freeguy77 what would be the chance of that given circumstances that the powder would only partially ignite? How slow would the bullet have to be going at 60 yards for the bullet to just stick in him an inch.? And if it was going that slow the sniper would have to aim above Kennedy’s head for the flight curviture to hit him in the back.
@@wishchris Same way the front shooter shot way over Kennedy's head on one, or through the windshield (hole) on another shot, etc.! And a rear shot from the County Records building is far more than 60 yds (180 ft.), more like 300 feet (100 yds.) if near the fatal front right temple shot distance. Hey, we can't guess what caused an under-powered bullet, it just makes the most sense that it happened. Aimed at his mid-head but the underpowered bullet went lower (obviously) and hit in his mid-back! No, not aiming over his head; traveling at 800-1,000 ft/sec is not small, just not 2,000 ft/sec.
I have that book, but you should read "The Girl on the Stairs" David Belin (commission lawyer interviewing people in Dallas) actually changed her testimony from what she said and didn't even bother to interview Sandra Styles who was with her. If what she said happened and it did, that means Oswald could not have been on the 6th floor that day coming down the stairs to get to the 2nd floor lunch room.
@@tomvan6008 Of course he didn't do it. He himself said he was a patsy. He knew he was being set up to take the fall. That's why he had to be eliminated before he could have a trial. He was a sheep dipped patsy. I will check that book out. Thank you for the suggestion.
@@tomvan6008 And that's what many people don't understand: that witnesses did speak up and were silenced... some for good. The people doing the "investigation", like Allen Dulles, were leading the investigation when he should've been investigated himself. He was fired by the man and then leads the investigation into the hit.
@@tomvan6008 That wasn't the only testimony the Warren Commission changed to try to put forth the lie of it being Oswald, acting alone. The Warren Commission's job was to obscure the truth, not to reveal it. Another example is the phony theory that the bullet that hit JFK in the back continued into John Connally, which was put forward by Commission lawyer Arlen Specter, later a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania.
Two of the worst!...Read Case Closed, and then read the most researched, truthful book of them all, "Reclaiming History" by the late, great Vincent Bugliosi...He really hashed everything out...and in that book, he mentions that he knew that in the future, other bogus facts and books will be made. You see, conspiracy books sell way better than truthful books!
"this is an advertisement to sell a book. boo. not news" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... in your opinion. People interested in this history consider it highly newsworthy. You sound very young. Go back to playing video games.
I remember this day so well even though I was just a young girl. It's one of those days I will never forget as 911, Space Shuttle Columbia, Jan 6th , Covid 19 etc. Times of fear, pain, sorrow and shock to America and the world. 😢🙏🇺🇸
I was in 4th grade and remember it all, too. So shocking. I don’t think we’ll ever know the truth. I believe many people were privy to the plans that were made to accomplish this. Was Oswald to be paid for his part in this? I don’t believe he was the real shooter. I think he was going to be blamed for something that couldn’t have taken place as people said.
@valeriesuttonpayne7413 I completely believe young Biden was a part of it. The reason?? JFK Jr. Wrote a letter dated 8/26/94 stating Biden was a traitor to his country and family.
Bill Cooper showed the missing footage. The DRIVER shot him from over his shoulder. It was a Masonic Skull & bones hit job by BUSH who are Skull & Bones masons. LOOK at the symbolism. Same with Towers. Look at that masonic ceremony afterwards. Jackie was holding red roses(Death) & afterwards yellow roses(friendship) were scattered on the back seat of the car. HOW many decades & no on noticed it? How about the assassination took place on the 33 parallel & an obelisk was put up on the roadside. Washington D.C.=A MASONIC TALMUDIC Satanic circus... Masonic symbolism crawling all over Diana death too. Its so in your face but Sheeple cant see through the SPELLS.
If he's convinced that there were only 3 shots because of the 3 shells on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository.... then let's count the shots. 1) the one in his back that they says is this pristine bullet that fell out onto the rear seat 2) the one that hit JFK in the neck (although there was no bullet hole in back of his neck)that then did acrobatics hitting Connelly in his back breaking a rib n then his wrist n ending up in his leg 3) the head shot that exploded JFK'S head... so there's the 3 shots... but.. what about the shot that missed the car and hit the curb in between Main n Commerce that struck Mr Teage in the cheek... that would be 4 shots. By the Zapuder film there would not have been enough time for one shooter to fire 4 shots ... hmm.
as I pointed out above to another commenter you forgot the bullet that was found in the grass near the manhole cover across from the GK. A man in a business suit was photographed putting it into his pant pocket.
The young doctor at the head of the exam table said he saw a small exit wound in Kennedy's neck, see his recent interview. This might have been Oswald's second shot. The shot at Connally probably had to be another, or the third. The first might have been a wild miss, chipping the curb, reasonable to assume if Oswald fired too soon. Was Oswald preparing to fire a 4th round, the Carcano having a 4-round magazine? The fatal shot, the last, appears to be from the front, from behind the fence area, see newsreel footage of people running up to and facing the grassy knoll. Was Oswald's job to set a pattern and rhythm of shots to mask the sound of a second shooter, audio witnesses reporting the last 2 shots came close together, Was Oswald aware of this or did he think he was going to be the hero and accomplish all this by himself? Did all this finally sink in when he said he was a patsy? A lot of questions here. Very strange that he would state there were only 3 shots and then sticking with the WC report conclusion even after revealing this additional evidence indicating the possibility of an additional shooter.
First shot was deflected by tree branches and seen disintegrating on the road in a spray of dust. Second shot has to have gone through both victims, the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body. Their reactions in Zapruder's film clearly show they are hit at the same instant. Third shot of course hit Kennedy in the head and a fragment of that bullet is what hit Tague.
@@bernieschiff5919 Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Autopsy shows the shot came from behind and Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. No bullets or fragments were ever found that don't match to Oswald's rifle. Anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy knoll fence would be absurdly obvious and very visible. Nobody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions. Officer Haygood, as he firmly testified, parked his bike at the base of the knoll and raced up it to secure the area, finding nothing and nobody. People saw him, assumed he must be chasing somebody, and this sparked a rush of followers. Behind the fence, they were all filmed milling aimlessly around with nothing to see.
I believe him. He disclosed this once before but it did not get picked up in the media. It makes more sense than the magic bullet theory. But it's strange that he wouldn't say anything about it to his colleagues.
@@aaronz7056 Actually two eye witness claim that the clean bullet came from Kennedy not Connolly. There are no eye witnesses that saw a pristine bullet removed from Connolly or on his stretcher. An attendant noticed the bullet on a stretcher when he was wheeling down another stretcher to the emergency entrance level. He did not know whose stretcher the bullet was on. To make the single bullet theory work, that bullet had to be connected to Connolly. I just don't believe the pristine bullet went through the two men. If one bullet went through Kennedy's neck and through Connolly , it would be greatly fragmented, not nearly whole. It is plausible imo that one bullet went through both of them, but it wasn't the pristine bullet.
The one thing we can take away from this is that a lot of law enforcement officials destroyed this murder investigation.
No...The WC got it right...law enforcement was more lax in those days.
Congress, man. Gerald Ford ended up being president Gerald Ford right?
Nope. I've researched this for years. It was a different time in 1963. Yes, today this would have been handled different but there is no doubt that the Warren Report was 100 percent right
I believe they are all connected!
Evil and dishonest!
Yes, but on purpose.
The Secret Service was probably part of the conspiracy that day. When the motorcade left Love Field, one of their men was ordered off the back of JFK's limo. He can be seen, in a video, raising his arms in consternation about the unexplained decision to remove him from the standing post on the rear bumper. Also, there were supposed to be motorcycle cops riding alongside JFK on both sides of the limo,, as part of his protection. When questioned about why those officers weren't there, some Secret Service guy said JFK had asked those officers not be there so people would have a better chance to see him. But the Secret Service later admitted that JFK's attitude toward their protection strategies was always to agree with whatever security formation they wanted. So they were lying.
You said it correctly as I have also repeated in exposing the Kennedy-hating liars! What you said about JFKs protection in previous motorcades is the truth, contrasted to the deliberately stripped-down protection on Nov. 22, contrasted to Mon. Nov. 18 in Tampa, FL. Only four days later, no motorcycle cops OR S.S. agents on the vulnerable right side where JFK sat. Only motorcycle cops FAR BACK from the limo on the left side! And the S.S. car should have been leading the limo (not trailing it), so it could deliberately slow down to stay close to the limo, but not allowing it to go slower than the legal 11mph for the president at all times. In trailing, it allows the driver (William Greer) to pull too far ahead, as was the case in Dallas, and the S.S. car was too far back to give him fast attention! Yes, you pointedly demolished that phony claim by the usual Kennedy-haters that Kennedy himself somehow could "order" S.S. agents away so people on the route could see him better, and he therefore caused his own death! That is cruel, not to mention completely wrong, as the S.S. can order the President in the law passed, not the other way around. And the S.S. did admit Kennedy did agree to do what the S.S. wanted in his entire 34 months as president, in order to protect him. Suddenly, that close protection as recently as in Tampa, FL with agents riding on the rear footrests and handles for over 26-miles, exactly as should have been replicated in Dallas, was not there!
Dead men tell no tales
There were a number of unusual things that happened that day. The phone system went down for about half hour immediately after the assassination in Washington. Oswald did not make all these unusual things happen. This assassination was orchestrated by Israel and the Rothchilds having the CIA do the killing. Members of the FBI and Secret Service were involved also.
The secret service stand down you are referring to is also on UA-cam…. Footage of it …
@@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cgalot of people died on that same day, and suvsequent days. These people were threatening to the narriative.
if you want to stop crime scene tampering why do you remove a bullet from the car and then surreptitiously put it on a stretcher without explanation. maybe it's true, and maybe he didn't have a bad intention. But bad decision.
Exactly right. It makes so little sense. And how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet for two generations of public debate on such a serious subject. No excuse for that.
@@calva221 "how could he be so uninvolved as to not know the importance of that bullet"
-------------------------------------------------------------------
It's entirely possible, given that the assassination was totally unexpected, the hospital scene was chaotic and disorderly, and given his age at the time.
@@kenthompson5723 He wasn't a child with no brain then! 28 is a full-brain developed adult. Interesting, the Founders mandated a Representative must be at least 25, exactly where psychologists say a person's brain is then fully developed and not the 21 (old) age for voting, but since 1971, only 18. Which was a cruel mistake just because men were drafted into the illegal Vietnam War at that same age, so people thought, if a man can be drafted, why can't he vote at that age? It was known then people don't have a full functioning brain developed until their 20s, so the 21 at least seemed reasonable, and far better than only as a teenager of 18! 30 is the minimum for a Senator, and 35 for the President.
@@freeguy77There should be a maximum rather than a minimum ! 75 and you retire as a politician or a judge .
More than bad...he would have been in deep trouble if found out!
Something doesn't smell right here...Landis was a trained Secret Service agent who knew better than to sheepishly slip such important evidence on to a stretcher...He would have given it to his supervisor and explained where he found it...I not only find this totally unbelievable but also find his saying he never heard or saw anything about the assassination or that bullet over the last 60 years to be laughable...Landis could have been charged with obstructing the investigation and failing to perform his duties and suffered serious consequences, so it just isn't believable that he would handle such evidence that way or no one would see him dropping that bullet on the stretcher...What rotten journalism the NBC host practices by failing to register that once Landis disproves the Magic Bullet that therefore Landis' claim that the 3 shells prove Oswald did it is invalid because the scenario now requires a 4th bullet...
This 100% correct!
There's NO magic bullet.
What is more unbelievable - an agent grabbing a bullet under shock and duress and putting it with the President, or an agent scrubbing the crime scene with a bucket of water within 10 minutes? Well, we know the latter definitely occurred. The point is that logic did not carry the day that day. He may be telling the truth.
I agree. One has to ask why now and why such an outlandish story given all the research that's been done. It would be much more interesting to find out what he's being paid, who he's scared of...Oliver Stone will figure it out.
Where are you getting the idea he never heard or saw anything about the assassination? He never said or implies that at all. In fact he says that exact opposite. He said was he intentionally avoiding reading about it. Meaning he absolutely did see stuff about it. He just refused to read what he saw.
Old guy is just repeating the government message. Obviously still very scared.
Grand-kids need to get into college.
That old guy is the agent that jumped onto the back of the limo after Kennedy was shot.
Totally. Bizarre they still trot this stuff out. It was a coup d’état conducted by the CIA.
and this "historian" says he believed the Warren Commission report. Anyone with a functioning brain cell would know the whole report is nonsense.
you took the words out of my mouth… please read my comment.
You can not be serious ... At 16:15 Landis says "I saw a bullet and wanted to preserve it, and make sure it did not get lost." So what does he do ?? He just lays it on a stretcher without telling a soul, having no clue who might find it, and leaves. HEY - how about giving it to Roy Kellerman the Secret Service Agent in charge that day and then showing him EXACTLY where you found it ?? Then he keeps silent about it for 60 years, even though it ends up being (somehow) found on Connally's stretcher. I 100% believe Clint Hill, who not only was the most attuned person in Dealey Plaza that day, but has been the most honest, transparent, reliable and haunted witness since Nov. 22, 1963.
Clint Hill wrote a very good books about 10 years ago in which he contacted EVERY Secret Service agent on the JFK detail asking for their accounts and recollections but Landis says he was never even contacted. BS. Then Landis makes the even more ludicrous claim that he merely found the bullet QUOTE "just lying where the seam on the back seat meets the middle of the trunk, and it's uhh where they would have attached the bubbletop." So that is on TOP of the back seat.
So now JFK researchers who question that the spent "magic bullet" had been likely to have fallen out of Connally's wrist and ended up on his stretcher - is going to instead try to imagine this same bullet (not pristine in any way to begin with, base is completely oval) went IN Kennedy's back but then just fell out BEHIND him. And what convenient timing for this new money-maker of a Book --- 2 months before the 60th anniversary of that horrible day.
This guy is full of bs. He saw a last opportunity to make some money for his kids and grandkids, before he leaves this planet.
Yeah, sorry, Landiis , but we have to be as skeptical about your story , as we ARE about the official version of the assassination . And exactly what point is all this if you yourself believe that Oswald was the lone assassin ???? I JUST DON'T GET IT !
Landis was there. You all were not. He knows what happened and what he did. You just don't like what he is saying. He had no reason to lie at 90 years old. He was a young rookie at the time and is a human being. Human beings make mistakes especially in moments of stress and shock.
@@lennon1252 Landis was 28 years old - is that merely a "mistaken young rookie" to you ? He had a SWORN duty to turn over CRITICAL evidence. You were not there either -- but you believe Landis - most of us believe Clint Hill instead. So Landis lied at 28, 38, 48, 58, 68, 78 and told the truth finally at 88. Your ever heard the term "dementia" son ? OK fine. You are entitled to think the guy waited 60 years to talk about the bullet that was the lynchpin of the case. Go buy his book - I am sure he'd love your money.
@@DanC-go9lc His age is not important. He was a rookie in the secret service. And if you search youtube Clint Hill admits in 2016 or 2014, I'm not sure if the year that Landis finally told him about the bullet he found. But he didn't say anything about it until recently. You can see it greatly affected him as he quit the service not soon after. Not everyone is cut out for that kind of work. Just imagine being 27 or any age and seeing Kennedy at Parkland with most of his head blown off. It traumatized Landis. And it's easy to be a Monday morning quarterback. Why didn't he give it to Kellerman? Kellerman and Greer sucked at their job. Greer turned around TWICE and instead of speeding up which would have saved Kennedy's life, he slowed down. And Kellerman turned around and saw Kennedy holding his throat and did nothing!
I count FIVE shots. One MISS, which caused concrete fragments to hit James Tague, one THROAT shot through the front windshield, one BACK shot which did not penetrate, a shot that hit Connelly and caused all of the damage to his body, and of course the Kennedy Head shot, which I believe originated from the front. That's five shots and that means that a conspiracy was in play that day.
You forgot the bullet that bystanders found near the manhole cover across from the GK. The bullet had dug a lengthy furrow through the grass as was pointed out by a woman bystander as seen in a photo taken. A followup photo is of a lanky man in a business suit putting the bullet in his pant pocket.
I agree, the final fatal shot was probably from the front, from the area behind the fence. A reasonable assumption would be Oswald's' first shot went wild and chipped the curb. The second, might have hit the president's neck, and left a small exit wound, see recent interview with the young doctor who was standing facing Kennedy on the exam table. The third hit Connally, going through bone, and would have been in bad shape. The two mushroom bullet fragments on the back seat came from where? Were these from Connally and picked up and placed on the rear seat? My question is the Carcano rifle has a 4-round magazine, only 3 rounds appear to have been fired. Why didn't Oswald, or the shooter fire a 4th shot? Audio witnesses tend to confirm the last 2 shots came close together, indicating multiple shooters. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots to mask the sound of another shooter(s), possibly from the front? Did this pristine bullet he mention fall out from Kennedy's neck or was it placed there in the confusion during the ride to the hospital.? Lots of questions here.
I count many speculative, uninformed opinions, by people like you...stick to the facts, OK?
Agree. 5 or 6
Most witnesses heard 3 shots.
Windshield is still in the national archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside.
It's completely implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
This story just does not add up: a Secret Service Agent with a bullet with rifling marks does not responsibly hold on to the bullet and turn it in to proper chain of command authority? Anyone with training in police work would know the rifling (striping?) would most definitely tie the bullet to whatever gun fired it. An essential piece of evidence that should have been tagged and identified with the time and location where it was found and the name of the person who found it and turned it in.
Better yet, the bullet should have been left where it was located on the limousine, for fingerprinting, (and today DNA testing), as well as ballistic trajectory analysis.
Of course in 1963, he did not have a mobile phone to call for backup to cordon off the limousine from the surging crowd at Parkland Hospital, so maybe it makes sense that he would pick up belongings and evidence that might otherwise have disappeared.
Furthermore, the bullet as seen in the Exhibit photo does not in any way appear deformed from impact, . . . which raises all kinds of questions.
And then, why did Agent Landis not pick up the “2 bright brass bullet fragments” (8:59) “on the seat,” "one of them, like my pinky finger, it was kind of mushroomed", . . . IN ADDITION to the "intact, . . . fully . . ., bullet," (9:14) seen "where the cushioning met the trunk of the car" that he did pick up, put in his pocket, and later placed on the gurney?
So, according to this eyewitness, there were at least 2 bullets, which the NBC moderator did not acknowledge.
Like everything in the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and years that followed, the Kennedy Assassination was a whirlwind of confusion, cacophony, and unreliable investigation.
Bill Cooper showed missing footage. The DRIVER shot Kennedy. Skull & Bones Secret Society(Bush). Notice Jackie holding RED ROSES(death) and right afterward YELLOW ROSES(friendship) were scattered over the backseat. UNREAL that SPELLS Sheeple cant seem to see. Its also the 33 parallel. Same with 911. Totally Masonic number.
DRIVER shot Kennedy. Bill Cooper showed the footage. Skull & Bones(BUSH) arranged it.... Bill Cooper was murdered. A fake alien attack planned with very realistic holograms. Like 911 holograms were used. Our government works for the bankers not the people.
Exactly. This is just another book sales tour all this has been explained by forensic ballistic experts. I can only assume they are trying to appeal to a different generation again.
Why wouldn't you come forwards with this longs agoes ,???? Not coming forwards with makes him part of it ECT.with his silence . Now's he's tampering s with evidence .So he's has toos plays alongs the storyline s that beens told s !!.or possibly jails times !! !!Now's sell sells his books ECT. Perhaps! He waited longs enough tells his story as he knows inter fearances ofs crime comes with prison s times as bigs fine .
Guess you didn't read the book?
The clip ends with him saying he believes in the lone gunman theory, what!? What was the point of that!?
He still loves his life.
He’s just stating he believes the facts in the case. He heard 3 shots and 3 cartridges were found on the 6th floor by the open window. Also, workers on the floor below testified that they not only heard 3 shots, but they heard the cartridges hit the floor directly above them.
@@dickhsv He heard 2 shots and Clint Hill heard also only 2 shots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They did not hear the loudest!!!!!!!!!! ADRENALINE
It wasn't an Assassination, it was a Coup.
Yes it was a COUP, but it was not possible without the murder (assassination) of John Kennedy.
So true
@@pavelusa3423 So false.
There was no "coup." That's an overly dramatic and inaccurate term to use here. It was a smooth transition of power as provided by the Constitution, from President to Vice President.
@@stddisclaimer8020 He is saying that the government killed the president.
My spiddy senses are tingling listening to this guy. Lets see if I got this right, he takes it upon himself to tamper with evidence at a crime scene (the bullet). He says he's concerned about the safety of the bullet (getting lost) yet he leaves it on the presidents gurney unattended and doesn't report to anybody what he did?!? And what's up with the cigarette lighter he also removes from the crime scene, finder's keepers?!? Nope, something is not right with this guy in my humble opinion.
Exact same phrase I used years ago, like 10 years ago, or so, when the other guy was interviewed along with him, I don't even have to watch 1 sec of this to know who it is, it's one of the two that they've been interviewing for years. Also did you not notice that, the fatal shot, ONLY comes when he stops in the street ?? He comes down to nearly a full stop, the fatal shot hits the front/side of this head, and then they drive off with him dead. Did you notice ?
@@xfiazc07 he's obviously got a guilty conscience from obstruction of justice and he's a traitor in my book and a coward
Yes, something happened, let me write a book 60 years after the fact.
Exactly what would he gain from lying or taking something from the scene of a crime?
@@cfields813 Did you listen to him talking?
It could not be possible for the bullet to make a hole in Kennedy's back and then fall back to that location with no evidence of any material on it. If it actually was there and Pauls story is true then it would make more sense for it to be a plant by someone else who wanted a bullet with the Carcano marks on it to be found. Maybe Clint put it there? :)
I always wondered why Clint would crawl into the car? It was a little too late to help the President.
Maybe your mama did!...What a stupid remark!
@@shelahogletree7711 His job was to protect mrs kennedy. He talks elsewhere about that being his role
Too much evidence was lost, destroyed, and ignored in this case for me to accept the official explanation. This just adds another layer of confusion.
@user-ij6vg8xq2r And all the alleged "evidence" whether lost or found, still doesn't amount to a hill of beans in terms of a conspiracy.
The SS was aware of at least 3 other previous assassination plots, yet stood down in Dallas.
Proof of conspiracy.
@@stddisclaimer8020lol. Do you still believe that Oswald did with $16 rifle and 3 shots 😂
@@dwaynegamble244 Once again (for those who missed the lesson), it doesn't matter what kind of rifle or number of shots. Firearms experts for both the WC and the HSCA proved that it was, in fact, Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that fired three bullets in Dealey Plaza, two of which struck the President. There is no evidence of anyone else owning or firing it. To insinuate (w/p evidence) that it was someone else is a trick that never works.
Once again (for those who missed the lesson), it doesn't matter what kind of rifle or number of shots. Firearms experts for both the WC and the HSCA proved that it was, in fact, Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that fired three bullets in Dealey Plaza, two of which struck the President. There is no evidence of anyone else owning or firing it. To insinuate (w/o evidence) that it was someone else is a trick that never works.
"Rolled from the gurney to the other" - yes, the magic bullet AGAIN does magic.
That was one of the darkest, saddest days in my life! I was 17 years old and a senior in High School!
mom was at high school to and she and other students started to cry.
Same here. I remember it well.
@@climeaware4814everyone was crying.
My mom went to a Catholic school and everyone cried. My dad said thought the Russians did it and was scared for nuclear war.
@@davidmitnick868 what's really sadder, our own government was involved, the same ones going after President Trump2024🇺🇲🦅❤️
I'm sorry for being so graphic, I don't buy the one shooter theory. I'm an experienced hunter and I've never seen an animals organs or tissues blow backwards when it was shot. The President's brain, if shot from the rear, would have splattered all over Governor Connally and his wife, not all over the rear of the limo. Mrs. Kennedy was seen and has stated that she crawled up on the rear of the limo to retrieve pieces of her husbands' brain. That shot had to have been from the front, thus proving there were at least two shooters. The bullet that was found by the Presidents' side, if it had been any of the bullets that struck either The President or governor Connally would have been deformed by the impact, which is what bullets are designed to do. I'm sorry, but the evidence screams conspiracy/cover-up.
I do. Go to Dealey Plaza and you will too.
You're not accounting for the speed of the car and wind speed. The limousine was traveling approximately 11 mph into a 15 mph wind with gusts up to 20 mph. Matter from JFKs head also exploded upwards and outwards in all directions. The wind gusts blew much of that matter, which was relatively light in weight, backwards as the car was moving forward. Furthermore, there was blood splatters on Connally and his wife, as well as, forensically and directionally appropriate blood splatters forward of Kennedy within the limousine. There has been a great deal of testing to recreate that tragic moment and the subsequent debris field and it has been resolved. Shots came from high and the rear. Secondly, the bullet was deformed on the side. The bullet exited JFKs neck(all soft tissue) and began tumbling, leaving an oval entry wound in Connally's back. It then shattered the fifth rib, exited the governor's chest, broke his wrist, and then partially embedded in the governor's leg. The key points here are that the bullet was no longer traveling in a straight line and was losing speed. The tip of the bullet wasn't deformed because it didn't come into direct contact with bone, it was the side of the bullet that absorbed much of the impact at lower velocity
@@rexbernard2805 doubtful.
@@pairashootpants5373 you wouldnt be the first to deny forensic science evidence
@@d.b.1858 LOL Just because I believe the Warren Report got it correct, doesn't mean I believe everything the government says FFS
He doesn’t deserve to make any money off his book. There’s no excuse for not speaking up at the time which as a Secret Agent, he knew better.
Well...remember, that he left the Secret just a few months after this shooting...and his resume of jobs afterwards point to a guy who was, shall we say, not the brightest bulb in the chandelier!!! Back then, the standards for Secret Service job...and even standards for police work...were quite low...also, the pay was not so good back in the day.
I was born in 1965 two years after his assination, in 1984 my History class all believed that there was a CIA cover up.
Yes, thanks to the myriad of conspiracy spreaders:
ua-cam.com/video/DC8tO16xdrY/v-deo.html
This man's statement that he believes it was Oswald, acting alone, could simply be fear. In the weeks after the assassination, people in Dallas became aware that some of those who had a piece of information that contradicted the official story of it being the "lone nut" Oswald were being found dead, their deaths poorly staged as suicides, but looking like murders in reality. In the next 15 years, many people who knew things about the assassination that didn't go along with the government's version died under "mysterious" circumstances. It's possible that he waited all these years to tell his story for the same reason.
Totally bogus...those mystery deaths were all accounted for!...try reading a book.
If you really want to be surprised.... find out what happened to the regular driver that was supposed to be driving that day.
@@PHUSHEY What happened to him?
Who exactly died under mysterious circumstances? Dazzle us with facts!
curbozerboomer. the deaths all happened under very unusual circumstances. none have been explained as due to circumstance. you need to read Richard Belzer's book "Hit List" and not all those CIA approved and directed books.
He didnt want anything to happen to the bullet and he put in in the gurney? ☹️ oh wow! worse place.
@Miranda - I don't believe for one second took 'that" of piece of
evidence and laid it near the Presidents foot "figuring" the M.E.
would find it, That is absurd, It could have rolled off the gurney
when they moved it. Someone, for whatever reason, could have
taken it. He "should" have slipped it into his pocket, and he knew
that was evidence, you tell no one about it, put it next to the dead
Presidents feet who was just assassinated and that's how
you safeguard an important piece of evidence? Why didn't
he easily slip it into his pocket where it would have been
well safeguarded. After he spoke about this whole story,
I call b.s. on it and would NEVER believe a single word out
of his mouth. What he was saying is totally ridiculous. I think
we know "who" was happy about this pre-planned assassination
and who carried it out. And that's all I'm going to say about it.
I think...if this happened at all...Landis just made an impulsive decision, and then realized he had made a real booboo!...so he left it where someone else would find it. I doubt if this story is true.
And he waits 60 years to tell us.
It also shocks me that so many involved have never read the Warren Commision Report, or studied any information available.
I agree andymark949. ua-cam.com/video/DC8tO16xdrY/v-deo.html
I WAS 13 YEARS OLD AND IN SCHOOL, THAY SENT US HOME, THIS WAS THE DAY THIS COUNTRY CRIED, AND THE WORLD CRIED WITH US.
It was also the day that America died for me . The assassination changed everything in America for the worst & has never recovered . Now that is the shame of it .
@patrickyoung3503 why? JFK might have been good looking and a good speaker but as far as policy, he was terrible. Plus, it's not like he won fairly. Bottom line, sure it's a tragedy but as far as president's, he sucked
From Landis’ Official Report Submitted on November 27, 1963:
As the Motorcade passed the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) “None of the windows were open, and I did not see anyone standing by them.”
[Numerous windows were open and people were visible in many of them.]
“The President's car and the Follow-up car had just completed their turns and both were straightening out [on Elm Street].”
“At this moment I heard what sounded like the report of a high-powered rifle from behind me, over my right shoulder. When I heard the sound there was no question in my mind what it was.”
[Surely the Warren Commission would want to hear every word Landis had to say.]
“I did not realize that President Kennedy had been shot at this point.”
“It was at this moment that I heard a second report and saw the President's head split open and pieces of flesh and blood flying through the air.”
“President slumped out of sight towards Mrs. Kennedy.”
“My reaction at this time was that the shot came from somewhere towards the front, right-hand side of the road.”
[That area would include the Triple Underpass and the Grassy Knoll. The Warren Commission immediately lost interest in Landis because they did not want to hear a single word about a shot coming from the front or the right.]
“I did not notice anyone on the overpass, and I scanned the area to the right of and below the overpass where the terrain sloped towards the road on which we were traveling.”
[Landis did not look to the TSBD following the head shot, he looked to the Grassy Knoll.]
“I do not recall hearing a third shot.”
When the Motorcade arrived at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Landis said “Mrs. Kennedy's purse and hat and a cigarette lighter were on the back seat. I picked these three items up as I walked through the car and followed Mrs. Kennedy into the hospital.”
A purse!
A hat!!
A cigarette lighter!!!
Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!!
Not one word about bullet fragments!!!!!
Not one word about placing the pristine bullet on President Kennedy’s gurney!!!!!!
Landis’ 60th Anniversary memory improvement is too little, too late, and unbelievable!!!!!!!
The official report to whom? Secret Service? The Warren Commission was two days away from being formed (Nov. 29th 1963) so a Nov 27th report could not have been WC testimony. Please furnish your source.
''Not one word about a pristine bullet!!!!''--------------------------Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah Why ?Hahahahahahahahahah Mistery?Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha Enigma? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaa
I believe you are correct!
To stop who?
@@narancauk In English the correct phraseology is “To stop whom?” If you have a serious question, please express it. Otherwise, do not waste our time.
I am hard pressed to imagine how a bullet fired from a gun could possibly come to a stop without deformation. I have enough familiarity with ballistics to realize that really cannot happen. A bullet hitting a down ski jacket will deform. The velocity is just so great and the bullet is designed to deform. Thats why its made of lead. (The guy said brass but he was mistaken - bullets are lead with copper jackets)
I don’t bring this up to cast doubt on this guys story but rather to just clarify the fact that bullets don’t just stop without deforming. And they deform a lot. So assuming this story is truthful - what could that tell us?
I did not mention it as not sure if I was correct but you confirmed the "Oswald bullets" were copper jacketed over the lead core. That's why they don't disintegrate (frangible or disintegrating) bullets that spewed hundreds of tiny pieces in Kennedy's skull. That also by itself destroys the myth, and Paul Landis inadvertent saying he found TWO tiny bullet fragments, right there destroys his own conclusion in still defending the massively discredited WC Report, although he doesn't realize what he is saying in the conclusion of finding the fragments, and where he found them. Not where Connally was, but where Jackie was, after he fell into where she was sitting. How ironic, that Paul Landis may get the crooked MSM to finally acknowledge their cover-up (the NY Times is one letting its guard down a little more now!) and allowing the government narrative control them. And if not most of the MSM, then many people will figure out they were lied to by the government-media axis after 60 years of denying it was nobody else by Oswald!
@@freeguy77 Qanon guy might be more apt, freeguy.
Oswalds bullets were "military jacketed" bullets, designed to go right through soldiers on the battlefield, limiting somewhat their internal injuries. remember, the rifle used was a WW2 surplus rifle, of Italian origin. It cost Oswald around $ 13 dollars!
@@curbozerboomer1773
Good Point. What we call Full Metal Jacket bullets May pass through without major deformation. I’m still a little doubtful but… it’s a fair point.
The gun itself makes no difference. After all a guns job is simply to hit the back of the bullet with a firing pin.
So an AR-15 is really no different from an old WW2 rifle except perhaps with regard to accuracy.
The bullet was a plant. This is plain to see.
Yes. That really clears up everything. Pathetic.
His story was never meant to "clear things up". But it makes more sense than the Warren Commission's magic bullet; that's what's pathetic.
Hmmm, seems pretty strange. What about HIS fingerprints on this bullet? The only other remote explanation is this might have been the 3rd bullet no one could find from 3 shots. However, for a highly-trained secret service agent to tamper with evidence and then remain silent just doesn't add up.
It was the president, but what a horrible event for any who were involved. To witness the utter violence of seeing any human being being shot, especially a head wound like that, never leaves you, never. You will see it for the rest of your life. May that man have peace. There is probably not a day that goes by that he doesnt think of it. Things like that never leave your mind, never.
I worked in a hospital in the mid 1980’s. A 14 year old boy was flown in who had suffered a shotgun wound to the face and head. Trust me. You don’t forget it.
He's a COWARD, waits waits 60 years to disclose what is EVIDENCE of a Crime this Thing is SLIME he's no man in my eyes.
They leave your mind when you die.
@@patrickhart4299 Don't be harder on Landis than his superiors who never wanted the truth.
@@vernpascal1531 He's LYING and there is proof of it.
I agree. It doesn't make any sense he would put the bullet on the gurney. I can see why he'd want to pick it up to make sure someone didn't take it with all the melee going on but, why wouldn't he show it to other SS agents, or the police or some other authority? Why did he stay silent? Maybe he was told by the CIA to keep his mouth shut... who knows.
I am writing this from memory, without referring to any books on the assassination. It has long been thought that the pristine bullet either worked its way out of the president's back when the doctors in the trauma room were trying to save the president's life, or else it was placed on the stretcher by somebody (which led to theories that the bullet was planted in order to frame Oswald). My recollection is that witnesses said it was found on Kennedy's stretcher and not Connally's stretcher, which has always been one of the difficulties with the single bullet theory, the other being, of course, that a nearly pristine bullet could not have done all that damage to two bodies. One of the doctors at Parkland Hospital probed with his finger the wound in Kennedy's back and found it to be only three inches deep, which suggests that the bullet struck him at a low velocity. If I recall correctly, this was a not uncommon defect with a Mannlicher Carcano rifle. Given the Secret Service agent's account of where he found the bullet, this all makes sense. And it is consistent with the long standing criticism that Kennedy's throat wound could not have been caused by the same bullet that entered his back because: (1) the throat wound was several inches higher than the back wound; (2) the president was sitting upright when he was struck in the throat as the Zapruder film clearly shows; and (3) the back wound was not a through wound. The conclusion is almost inescapable that the throat wound was caused by a bullet fired from the front. Its dimensions have never been described because it was obliterated by the tracheotomy, so it was never identified as an entrance wound or an exit wound. This leaves us with five bullets: one that missed the limousine altogether, one that struck Kennedy in the back, one that struck Kennedy in the throat, one that did all the damage to Connally, and one that hit Kennedy in the head. Some of the witnesses said they heard three shots, others said they heard four or five. Given the rapid sequence of the shots, the echoes in Dealey Plaza, and the differing locations of the witnesses, it is no wonder that accounts differ. In defense of the Secret Service agent, he was wise to protect the evidence without turning it over to the Dallas police. Granted, it would have been better if the bullet could have remained where it was found until the car was photographed as a crime scene, but it was not in his power to make that happen. His concern about souvenir hunters was not unreasonable. If he is telling the truth, I thank him for coming forward. -- Richard Hayes Phillips
What about the bullet that struck the front windshield.
I agree with the bullet coming back out of Kennedy's back , it is possible that 9 shots were fired plan A at the intersection turning into the plaza where the limo went wide ( Greer ) panicked the first volley occured .
I disagree about one thing. The ER doctors have made it clear that the neck wound was an entrance wound and it was the exit wound from that bullet that blew out most of the president's brain from the right back of his head. This would mean there was someone firing from the front, either from the grassy knoll or the overpass. It was not Oswald (or anyone else) firing only from the back.
Although the bullet could have been under-powered, another possibility is that it struck Kennedy just below the top of the steel and leather brace he was wearing. The brace was described by the chief doctor in Trauma Room 1 who described how it curved up in the back from under the arms. This would have acted like a bullet proof vest and could have prevented the bullet from penetrating more that the few inches described by the examining doctors. The brace could account for the bullet's relatively pristine condition, especially if the leather part of the brace bore the brunt of the bullet's force. This theory could be verified or refuted by an examination of the back brace if it is preserved somewhere.
@@jefferydowler4655That was a bully fragment from the third shot that hit JFK in the back of the head
This guy is admitting to tampering with evidence and deciding what Jackie should or should not see. Sheer incompetence.
I still remember what and where I was when this happened. SAD day in America.
Me too in the UK
Me too. 4th grade.
my age exactly.@@chgosatrap
So when you say you still remember "what" you were back then? Are you saying you weren't always human? Were you a turtle when it happened? I'm curious
I don't know about you but I would love to see a professional marksmen replicate the shot from room, floor, vehicle, speed and even weather.
That shot was not very difficult!...Several trials concerning this have been held, with mixed results.
I can tell you never handled or shot a 6.5mm Italian Carcano rifle.....@@curbozerboomer1773
@@curbozerboomer1773
But have they ever asked Mark Wahlberg to duplicate it?
It's been tried, 3 aimed shots and it's an impossibility. Oswald was a distraction and a patsy. Kennedy was shot from the grassy knoll and the over pass.
@@curbozerboomer1773Sure. I imagine that you must be an expert paint baller.
Killed any possibility of credibility when he said that Oswald was the lone assassin. 🤨
Exactly cause it was way too early in the so-called investigation to come to that conclusion. The lone assassin bs was regurgitated for a reason and we all know it deep down
Oswald had nothing to do with.He was killed because of Dimona. JFK didnt want to stop monitor Dimona because he didnt want them to have a nuclear arsenal.
This doesn't seem credible. A trained secret service agent, with important crime scene evidence but doesn't even inform his superiors, really?
However, I always thought the stretcher bullet came from Kennedy's back, and this confirms it. Also, in the interview he says 'I heard the first shot, then a second shot closely followed by a third'. Why doesn't the interviewer ask how close together were 2nd and 3rd shots? This is absolutely crucial to the case. If the shots were very close together - some witnesses said they were almost on top of each other - then there had to be two shooters, because it's impossible to reload and fire that quickly. Two shooters equals conspiracy...
The retired agents story just does not make sense to me . After almost 60 years he comes forward and says he moved the bullet from the Kennedy car to a gurney . I also wonder about shots 2 and 3 being so close together . I remember NBC reporter Robin MacNeil was on the scene in Dallas . He also mentioned that shots 2 and 3 were so close . The other thing that bothers me is none of the several reporters went back to Parkland the next day . I would have thought they might interview the emergency dept staff .
Yeah, many witnesses describe the 2nd and 3rd shots as being very close to one another. Their testimony was either altered or ignored altogether by the Warren report.@@larrysproul9424
I agree, an important detail glossed over by many. Also, an important piece of evidence not mentioned in the WC report. The last 2 shots being almost on top of each other indicates multiple shooters. These were probably the 3rd and 4th shots, not the 2nd and 3rd. His memory might be confusing the last 2 as one, a possibility in the echo chamber of Daley Plaza and the passage of time. Was Oswald's job to set a rhythm or pattern of shots that would mask the sound of another shooter? Why didn't he fire a 4th shot? the Carcano rifle had a 4-round magazine. Was Oswald aware of other shooters or was he led to believe he was going to be the hero and then only put the pieces together when he said he was a patsy? This is a carefully rehearsed statement about the 3 shots and his general agreement with the official report. Many questions here after he could have tampered with evidence and did not protect the crime scene or notify his superiors of his actions.
Only a few witnesses actually mentioned the last two shots being clos together...The consensus is, that Dealey Plaza was subject to lots of echo...this was proven by subsequent rifles being shot, as an experiment. Three shots only...and Oswald actually had over 8 seconds to shoot the 2nd and 3rd shots...he obviously got more accurate with each shot!
Doesn't make sense. If there were lots of echo you would hear multiple sounds surely? An echo on first shot, echo on 2nd shot, echo on 3rd shot - multiple echos. But that's not what people said they heard...@@curbozerboomer1773
One of the most important principals of police work is continuity of evidence. From the time it is first secured, it must be documented to whom it is transferred every time it is transferred.
Clint Hill, with all respect to him, has a vested interest in this new evidence being rejected by the public.
And what would that be? Please do lay it out for us.
Yes, absolutely. Thank you for mentioning that.
And you are '' the pubic''---Hahahahahahahahaha
Why would that be? This guy says he was not interviewed by anyone after the assassination. That beggars belief. Big time. I'm not buying that.
@@clayoreilly4553 I am not selling that !
First, thanks S/A Landis for your service to our country. Second, some time before he died in 1997, didn't S/A Sam Kinney state that it was he who put the bullet on the gurney? Does this mean that two bullets were found and left (without tagging as evidence) on two different gurneys, or are two agents taking credit for the same act? The upcoming book may be an interesting read, but I'm curious as to who funded the project. Which companies contributed? And of course, at 4:23, if a bullet rolled from JFK's gurney to Gov. Connally's, without hitting the floor, then it truly was a magic bullet indeed.
ua-cam.com/video/cyf70ziwWgs/v-deo.html&lc=UgzljQypP_I2Xkl-v_N4AaABAg
You are correct regarding Sam Kinney. During a TV interview he revealed that he put a bullet from the limo onto a stretcher in Parkland. He didn't say "Why" he didn't turn it in to his USSS supervisor and he didn't describe the bullet itself. Unsurprisingly, this statement was "cut" from the broadcast. Kinney wasn't pleased by this...
The orderly that actually found the stretcher bullet turned it over to the hospital head of Security. Both stated unequivocally that CE399 was "not" the bullet found on the stretcher. The third person who had custody of the bullet stated that he could not identify CE399 as the bullet he was given. The bullets further chain of custody is contradictory and cannot be determined.
Paul Landis (apparently) didn't mention whether CE399 was or was not the bullet that he put on the stretcher. His reason for leaving it on the stretcher (he didn't want it to get "lost") doesn't explain why he removed evidence from a crime scene, showed it to no other SS agent at the crime scene, and did not turn it in to his supervisor. Although not explicitly stated, he told no one that he left the bullet on the stretcher. He had to know that by moving the bullet to the stretcher it would effect any proper analysis of the crime, yet he never revealed his actions to the SS. His actions are inexplicable - unless of course he was protecting this evidence from the Secret Service itself, because he firmly believed that they would "lose" it. What did he know - - that convinced him he couldn't trust SS???
No it means that Landis is pushing a book.
@@thomasneal4775 Listen to the interview. He said his motivation for removing the bullet was that all kinds of people were converging on the car and he wanted to preserve the evidence. Not saying it is true or not true but that is what he says in this interview.
What you say is true and I am aware. Read my reply. I go on to state that he gives no explanation as to why he leaves the limo bullet on the stretcher, nor why he tells no one that he did it! This is unquestionably a case of altering the crime scene, which presents false evidence to any investigation. Obviously, he should have turned the bullet in to SS, but elected NOT to do this. The only explanation is he didn't trust them with the evidence. To be certain, only minutes after the shooting, that the bullet was unsafe with SS we must ask the question, "What did he know prior to the shooting, or what did he see during the shooting?" Additionally, how did a "pristine" (as Landis states) bullet enter JFK's back, bounce off, or fall out and end up on top of the back of JFK's seat? Given your statement regarding the large number of people around the limo at the time, anyone of them could have placed it there as easily as Landis placed the bullet on the stretcher.
How are bullet fragments brass?
Why did the Warren commission not ask him anything. HE Was not a witness called by the Warren commission who had a slam dunk patsy
''Why did the Warren commission not ask him anything''-------Hahahahahahahahhah Why do you think....................?
At 9:00 minutes in he says he found "bullet fragments". One was the size of the end of his pinky and mushroomed and he doesn't mention the other of the "two shiny fragments". THEN he found the intact bullet above the seat. Those fragments were forensic evidence. I have never heard that any fragments were found in the limo, and I have written a movie and an upcoming book on this. The limo was a crime scene. Today we know of CSI or CSU, but homicide detectives for decades preserved, photographed, and documented things like fragments and blood splatter as important in determining the direction of a bullet. The direction of the bullet is at the center of the whole 60 years of conspiracy madness. I find it hard to believe that SS agents were not, at minimum, aware of crime scene procedure. There are eyewitness accounts of them scrubbing down the back seat right outside Parkland Hospital. Destroying blood splatter forensics. Also if the bullet was on the back ledge of the limo, then it never entered the limo. (Although a sub-sonic bullet, meeting any object would have either dug in or bounced off, Kennedy had a back brace. Maybe the bullet glanced off that,) but the kinetic energy of a projectile traveling like a bullet pushes the bounds of physics to suggest that it just stopped cold and fell onto the open rear deck of the limo which had just sped down the Stemmons Freeway at 80-90 miles an hour taking turns and stopping with a lurch. For these and a few other reasons, to my way of thinking, this does not line up with reality. - Tom Avitabile, author of Ask Not!
You are CORRECT !!! Cyril Wecht has explained that bullets LODGE in a victim and NEVER fall out !! Witnesses before the ARRB described Dr. Humes ALTERING JFK's wounds in a Bethesda morgue room BEFORE the official autopsy at 8pm !! One witness saw autopsy doctor Humes take a BONE SAW to JFK's skull !!! Humes REMOVED the back bullet, the throat bullet, and mutilated the head before the autopsy !! C.E. 399 was a PLANTED bullet meant to link to the depository rifle....which was NOT even the rifle Oswald was photographed with !!!
The cover up started immediately after the last bullit was fired , the official story was just three shots fired , if mr Teague hadn’t been hit with a piece of flying debris , then they wouldn’t have had to come up with the Magic bullit theory . Sounds like three bullits found on that back seat of the limousine fragments , mushroom , and intacked pristine. New evidence for a book just before the 60 anniversary of the assassination me thinks !
The most significant takeaway. You mention the 2 shiny objects in a pool of blood and he examined one. Put it back and grabbed the other bullet? Nope.
That’s wild. He just killed the magic bullet theory but he still thinks Oswald acted alone???? How?
Because they're still covering it up. The country changed hands that day and we've never gotten it back.
I think he says he still believes Lee Oswald “did it” but had help in the process, i.e. an accomplice. I might be wrong about this.
Exactly, @HeyDuffy459. It makes no sense. I think he might just be a confused old man. Also: If CE 399 didn't exit through Kennedy's neck from behind -- if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none.
@@calva221" if the throat wound really was an entry wound fired from the right/front - then where's the exit wound for that shot? There is none."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There would be no exit wound if the bullet used was a frangible (exploding) bullet.
Wait til u get old and can't really remember....wrote a freaking book
I would like to see if he was interviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990's and what was recorded? The fact that the "Super" Secret Service when instructed by the ARRB not to destroy records did in fact destroy records speaks volumes about what they were hiding. Also the fact that the two Naval doctors at the Bethesda autopsy never performed a gunshot autopsy, then burned or lost their original autopsy reports is troubling. These doctors reported the back wound was shallow with no projectile found, yet world renown pathologist, Dr. Cyril Wecht states bullets do not "back out" of wounds. And add in the fact that in the Warren commission final report, then Congressman Gerald Ford moved the back wound up several inches to fit the single bullet theory. Now add this into the narrative is to muddy up the waters further while President Biden refused to release the remaining Assassination Records. Imagine that?
True.
Both administrations refused to release the last documents.
He wasn’t interviewed by the Warren Report group, but you likely know that. I first heard this on the “Redacted” editorialized news report.
I wish you had interviewed Landis on this NBC segment and not Mr. Touchy-Feely.
Hmm, strange Oswald's military records are "missing" also. Key evidence has this way of being missing. If Oswald was the lone assassin then there would be no need for any of this to happen.
Is tampering with evidence in a murder investigation a crime?
I believe it is , and this wasn't just an ordinary crime. ...The JFK assassination has been labelled " THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY " Now, the question is , is there a statute of limitations on the crime of the century ? If there is not , Mr. Landis might be in some trouble .
@@intothelight8123 the secret service cleaned out the limo at Parkland. They washed it out. Wasn't THAT tampering with evidence?
I guess not in THIS murder investigation.
Question not asked: Why did Landis believe he needed to tamper with (i.e., move and deposit elsewhere) such critically important evidence? Did he believe it would disappear if he left it where he first observed it? If so, why did he believe that? If not, Landis’ actions and statements demonstrate extremely shoddy safeguarding of crime scene evidence. Negligence and mishandling of evidence to that extent is more consistent with 1863 than 1963. Second question not asked: Why did Landis transplant the intact bullet but not the fragment? Mr. Landis, you condemned yourself with your own words. If what you say is true you have committed a great disservice to your oath, your agency and your country!
The guy's a lying clown just trying to cash in.
Souvenir hunters
Those secret service people have a lot to account for ... where were they? ... even the Secret Service detail were perplexed by the absence of surround officers ... they weren't there ... even one of them only 3 minutes before had his hands in the air as if to say what is going on ??? You tell me ... a secret service detail who were conveniently absent at the time of impact !!!
That limo was terrifyingly lacking in Agents - WHY would they not be there, because they are PAID to be there. 🤔
They were exactly as close as they could have been without being on the car. And they were not on the car because JFK ordered that they not be on the car. Try to accept this fact.
@@calva221 It's not that don't or won't accept anything. Was simply unaware that Kennedy would order that. Non-sensical order, if you ask me, and I had years of U.S.ARMY training, and never heard an order on the level of that one.
🤔🤔🤨
@@ThisIS_Insane Sorry, I always think everyone knows what I know and CHOOSE to disregard it. Kennedy did tell the agents he didn't want them there because he believed they came between him and the people. One of his quotes on the subject was, while riding in a motorcade in Florida before Dallas: "Keep those Ivy league charlatans off the limo". Some try to dispute this but Clint Hill among other agents, like Jerry Blaine, say it's true and that's good enough for me.
@@calva221 they were hungover from to much moonshine the night before, and Vince Palamara in his book long ago demolished the myth that JFK ordered it.
6:22 - this and the photo after it is agent Clint Hill, not Paul Landis.
And it's taken this guy 60 years to state this? Come on....
He still doesnt realize his testimony proves oswald didnt act alone
Somehow Oliver Stone knew all about this 33 years ago.
Jim Garrison was how Oliver Stone knew. Let's not forget that. Garrison's investigation was brilliant and courageous. He paid a heavy price as he was a victim of character assassination by the FBI, the CIA, and our news media. Oliver Stone did an excellent job of bringing Jim Garrison's investigation to public view.
💯
We’ve all known about it for 55 years. The warren commission was corrupt.
I was thinking along those lines.
Him and millions of Americans
Anyone with a microscope and had grade 5 chemistry could clearly tell if there was more then 1 gun man...the rifling on the bullet doesnt lie
this guy himself looks suspicious too. why did he pick up the bullet, put it in his pocket then throw it on to the gurney?Even a rookie cop does not do this.
This is ridiculous. "ok, we better not lose this important piece of evidence so I will just lay here on the gurney and walk away. Nothing will happen to it."
He never thought about it? Sounds strange to me.
This makes no sense..he would have been trained to report evidence where found ...US Secret Service is very strict in their training and was even then...
Not so much, I am afraid!
And he told no one about this until now. Give me a break.
Just like Clint Hill, neither account can be trusted. They both waited.
Because they both suffered from PTSD, and Clint was an alcoholic for years.@@seahour9147
Big deal, he found one of the bullets that was shot. Magic bullet theory was debunked a decade ago.
60 years ? why keep such an important thing from everybody?
Getting a call at 10pm and a strange crackly voice tells you that they were enjoying watching your grandaughter in the playground could be very persuasive.
Do some reading.
No excuse die telling the truth then....they should put him in jail
@@postergmail6202 😄thanks
It makes absolutely no sense that a secret service agent would pick up a bullet and pick it up and put in his pocket....without turning it over to Dallas Police. That bullet was part of a crime scene. Putting it on a gurney was just stupid. Anything could have happened to it. Also, shortly after the president was brought in to parkland, someone was dispatched to clean up the back seat of the limousine with a rag and a mop of water. This is madness! That was a crime scene. The location of blood and brain tells a lot about bullet trajectories.
I thought the Secret Service was smarter than this, I was wrong. 😮
He kept this to himself all these years and now he wants to sell a book. That's some integrity there.
Sure he has lots of time spend it. People like you would defend stalin or hitler or mao.
A normal secret service guy does not leave a bullet anywhere. He places it in a bag and gives it to the police for example.
What is in the back of every researcher's mind into the Kennedy Assination is that if Paul Landis' account is 100% accurate, it brings up the annoying possible explanation that the bullet had been already discreetly placed there to embelish the story of a lone assasin, before Kennedy was even in the limosine and in the motorcade. It was planted there before the assasination.
Are these your classic researchers or the ones who graduated from the University of UA-cam?
That is ridiculous. Really ridiculous.
the Kennedy's would have noticed.
the implication is that the bullet was planted as the car was en route to parkland.
which is Why
Hill jumped at the publicizing of this information.
@@TvDaddyAndTheTabloidArmy GGGGGGGGGGGreat to hear from you. Of course, you're right if it was out in the open security would have spotted it, unless it was tucking in a crease. What is obvious to me though, is that the story doesn't add up about the bullet being spent and only sticking in Kennedy's back because it was out of force. It was shot into something soft to have been so pristine and also it had no blood on it. The sniper on the grassy knoll was James Files---he admitted using a Remington Fireball with hollow points. He was aiming for the left eye when Kennedy jerked and so he hit him in the right temple. The thing we have to look out for is information that comes but there is no way to prove it. Even Files testimony has been called out, but Files named people who were seen at Dealey Plaza---and who would admit to killing Kennedy? The biggest blooper of the whole affair to me was when George H. W. Bush was asked by a reporter at a press conference where he was on 22 November, 1963. He said he didn't remember! The funny thing is there is a picture of him on the internet at Dealey Plaza on 22 November, 1963.
@@info_dash313 that's all you have, because you've been to lazy, scared, and programed to read and study.
JFK died instantly after he was struck by a "special" round fired by James E Files from behind the picket fence. He used a Remington Fireball long pistol with telescopic sight, the special round had the tip drilled out and was filled with mercury which was responsible for the massive wound on the right side of JFKs head. Files was a hitman for the mob in Chicago, he worked for Charles Nicoletti who fired the shot from the Daltex building which struck Kennedy on the upper left of his back, it did not come out of his neck, the first shot hit him in the throat from the front, hence the bullet hole in the windscreen.
totally disproven BS!
James Files' claims:
a) He was palling around with Oswald in New Orleans in 1961.
Oswald, of course, was in Minsk in 1961.
b) He was present at a Dallas meeting the morning of the assassination where it was discussed how the parade route had been changed.
The parade route was never changed.
c) He was a knoll assassin.
Phone records demonstrate Files was in Chicago during the assassination. Confronted with this, he tried to claim he was being confused with his own non-existent twin brother.
No wonder NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown after they took a closer look at him.
What makes it ironic is that I found a life magazine from December 1963 at my thrift store today… And JFK and Jackie 70th wedding anniversary is today…
Synchronicity
I thought I remembered some anniversary on Sep. 12. It is 70 years since their wedding day. Only 10 years and 2 months later, it was over.
You may want to look up the definition of “ironic”, because there is nothing ironic about your post
How odd that agent Sam Kinney, driver of the back up car said in 2013 that HE found the bullet.
Hire a hitman. Hire a hitman for the hitman. The plot of every episode of The Untouchables. How anybody thinks it wasn't a Mafia hit is beyond me. They got Bobby too! Dorothy Kilgallen figured out their scheme and they hit her as well.
m10000. 💯👍
We know how this works from Hollywood movies. A professional hit is always done using a shooter and a backup man. See "Bullett" and "The seven Ups". There are other examples out there as well.
Time for your meds.
If Kilgallen had any info that was going to blow any plot she was sure in no hurry to do anything with any of it. The HSCA investigated her death and found no evidence of foul play.
Thank you Paul for coming forward....i have never believed it was Oswald nor any 1 shooter. Definitely a major set up with shooters all around
But he stated that he believes it was only Oswald, so how is it only one gunman.
@@trusso11783 But the hard evidence of never on the 6th floor, no nitrate gunshot residue in the test that day, etc., contradicts Landis on many points!
Your belief does not make it true!
Incorrect.@@freeguy77
There was a hole in the windshield of the limo.
This is probably the bullet that came from the other direction.
It explains a lot.
Not a hole, just an area where a bullet fragment from the head shot hit the glass...no actual penetrating hole!
This explains even more: the windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. The idea somebody was trying to frame this on Oswald from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), in plain line of sight of everybody in the motorcade, firing through glass (!) and shooting Kennedy in the face is laughable.
He should of come out with this information years ago. Waiting this long is a terrible mistake as he could of put an end to the whole lone gunman BS.
Except he said he believed that Oswald acted alone based on the 3 shots he heard and the 3 spent cartridges found in the school book depository. The bullet possibly fell off of Governor Connally as they pulled and tugged and lifted him out of the jump seat in front of the President.
I haven't watched this yet but i assume they are finally going to admit that the 3rd bullet was accidentally fired from an armourlite rifle in the secret service car travelling behind
It's interesting you say that, because I know a former senior police officer in the UK (Chief Superintendent level), and after he retired he did his own investigation. I asked him, "Was Kennedy shot from two different directions?", and he said pretty much what you said. "He was shot from three directions. The third was an accidental discharge from security people from behind"
Nope...that book, "Mortal Error" was debunked, based on actual ballistics--and by film! many years ago, in fact--the supposed SS agent who accidentally fired his AR 15 weapon, sued the authors of the book, and won a large sum of money..His name was George Hickey.
Flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, medical and ballistic evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of the book that accused him.
@@herseem Want to frame a shooting on a lone gunman? Just fire away from multiple directions!
Well it explains 2 things how it got on the gurney and explained the back wound. Plus destroying the magic bullet theory ?
This clown doesn't even explain what the heck is supposed to have happened to the bullet that DID go through Connally.
How much stock should we put into the memory of someone in their 80s from an event that took place 60 years ago? Most people his age can not remember what they did the pervious week.
Exactly. There is a book to sell
What about the head shot? You think Lee Harvey Oswald took that shot too? It doesn't make any sense.
Yes he was Olympic gold medalist .
narancauk. . He was not!! who is paying you to spread disinformation??
It would be a clear and direct shot for Oswald.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle.
A man who could have plausibly been Oswald was seen in the window.
No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the crime scene.
Oswald lied about his whereabouts during the shooting.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow and rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@narancauk Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook. Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away.
@@aaronz7056 ''Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle ''.--------Smuggled .For whom????Do you know how long take to assemble a rifle especially with co workers walking around? You should try. Hahahahahahahahahaha
Why is this agent coming forward 60 years later?? To sell a book and make money. And how can you get people interested in a book if you are just going to repeat the same written statements you provided in the days after the assassination?? You change the story - offer up a new version - which is sure to get media attention (like it now has) and peak people's curiosity so they will buy your book. DISGUSTING.
Who was the FBI Director and who was the head of the CIA at the time im just wondering?
J. Edgar Hoover. FBI. And John MaCone CIA.
@@howieduin915 hey i keep trying to remember did George Bush take the director position right after that happened?
You could find this on your own...try reading a freaking book!
@@curbozerboomer1773 good point
It's sad what financial insecurity can lead some people to do. At least he's not peddling dope, though.
Exactly. Life in America
There's a very simple explanation to this story. First, there's no way this is the bullet that struck Kennedy's head, and there's no way the one that went through his throat ended up falling on the seat immediately after leaving Kennedy's body. However, the most likely explanation is that it's the bullet that went through both men, and fell on the seat when they removed Connally's injured body from the vehicle. The jump seat was right there close to Kennedy's seat. BTW - the term "magic bullet" was coined before it was generally known that the jump seat was inboard of where Kennedy was sitting... Initially it was believed that Connally sat exactly in front of Kennedy, making it such that the bullet would have had to turn a corner to enter Connally's body. But he was not sitting precisely in front of Kennedy - he was slightly inboard from him.
No bullet went through both men. That never happened.
@@Whitney-w2c Really? prove it.
Thank you for your honestly and logical understanding of what likely happened. Unfortunately honesty and logic don’t sell books. You won’t get many “likes” with your position, but rest assured that you’re right. I just heard a refreshing interview (about this agent’s claims) with Gerald Posner, who wrote “Case Closed”, in my mind the definitive book on the JFK assassination.
@@dickhsv Agreed. All of those conspiracy books have been written to rake in the money. Even Oliver Stone ignores the fact that the jump seats were inboard so he can sell more copies of the JFK movie. All of the evidence points towards 3 shots fired from the Texas School Book Depository, including the Zapruder film. If you look at it frame by frame, the frame in which Kennedy is shot shows his head moving FORWARD, and the majority of brain and bone matter flying off in front of him.
Posner’s was the absolute worst book I read about the assassination. Read books authored by Charles Crenshaw (one of the ER doctors that operated on JFK) and you will understand why Posner was WAY off base.
Im glad he came forward he was prob scared to death to talk after all the stuff that happened
If it wasn't for the motorcycle cops mike being left on, and the eyewitness that was struck by curb fragments, they would not have altered their 3 shot theory. They took an identical rifle, placed it in a vice, and tried to fire 4 shots without aiming and could not do it. The first photos taken in the book depository of the sniper's nest and gun found show the gun was a Mauser.
The dictabelt evidence was found to be erroneous and invalid as evidence, soundly debunked more than 40 years ago.
4:00 How can the media present this with a straight face? Even back then, there was protocol for a crime scene. Even then, it would have been COMPLETELY unacceptable for him to just "grab it".
Well people will say that was the protocol back then. Sure.
UPDATE: In a separate solo interview James Robenalt further explains his belief that the Bullet was undercharged (he claims that was not uncommon for the Manlicher Carcano) and being undercharged did not have the energy to go through the president but instead lodged in Kennedy's back (sticking out) Jackie comforting the president may have snagged the bullet and possibly it fell onto the back deck when she crawled over the rear of the limo. Highly plausible explanation of how it got on the rear ledge and wasn't deformed as a fully charged bullet would have been. Still doesn't explain the two shiny fragments. Or Landis not securing the crime scene (his primary protectee was Jackie so he was solely focused on her) but he could have commandeered someone (DPD or even a civilian to guard the car - maybe) This rationale has elevated my initial impression of Robenalt.
If 'undercharged' the muzzle pressure would have been greatly reduced and therefore it, being one of the audible shots, would have sounded different than the other "two" shots .. I see no research on the audio characteristics of a low pressure shot .. moreover, if a person, or group of persons, planned something as huge and horrible as this event, one would imagine they'd not be stupid and use cheap-o military ammo .. which is usually ball ammo ... American's know it's all a big sham. What will they do about it? Nothing. Of course.
@@DonMillerCET Don, I agree with everything you said here. One interesting wrinkle. Landis at first said he heard only two shots. (Later he said 3). If out of the 3 shots one was undercharged would that have resulted in a lower audio profile so he only heard the two fully charged while riding on the running board of the second car, so close to a cheering crowd? I’m not a advocating that, just wondering.
silencers were used by at least a couple assassins which may partially account for the reduced velocity and impact penetration.
Clint Hill was Jackie's personal protecting agent. Not Landis.
It it was Oswald, he sure would have used the same military ammo have was used to.@@DonMillerCET
Number one guestion? Why is this guy just now coming out with story which is evidence tampering and making false statements 60 years ago!?
It's understandable as to why Landis had fear regarding his action/ account. Everyone who posed a possible serious challenge to the narrative (for quite some time), ended up dead.
Rubbish. Who? Who "ended up dead?" lol
The book : HIT LIST, by the late actor, comedian (& intellectual)- Richard Beltzer, is a sad, but compelling synopsis of all the deaths surrounding the JFK association.
Mr. Landis expressed his intention to preserve the evidence, yet he later stated that he left it on the hospital bed next to JFK's feet. This contradiction seems highly implausible.
Shot that killed him came from front
That's what a Pathologist from Pgh, Pa. Cyril Wecht that examined JFK at Walter Reed and said he was hit from the front. He said they botched the skull and stitches were in place.
Yes, somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from behind stood in front and shot Kennedy in the face.
From driver
So let me get this straight, a trained Secret Service person found evidence in the back of JFK's car and took that evidence and put it on the gurney of of JFK and didn't publicly talk about it for 60 years? Absolutely amazing to bring this up on the 60th year anniversary and wrote a book. What a coincidence. "No one asked me about it" ridiculous. He's trying to sell a book and make some money.
I wonder if Landis would care to speculate what sort of calibre round would be fired at a distance of 60-100 yards and yet would only have the power or force to penetrate about an inch of flesh in Kennedy’s back and then fall in to the back seat in a pristine condition. This man is mistaken.
A full-metal copper-jacketed bullet could, if its powder wasn't fully ignited, not go at the usual 2,000 ft/sec (approx. rifle round) velocity, and therefore, may not penetrate the body deeply after going through his suit jacket, and shirt before hitting his skin. The County Records building (behind and South of TSBD) added more distance, giving credence to where some say a hidden rifleman fired, hitting Kennedy in his MID-BACK, not the 'neck' area. If under-powered, it would then only go into him an inch or two, able to fall out with only minimal damage to it.
@@freeguy77 what would be the chance of that given circumstances that the powder would only partially ignite? How slow would the bullet have to be going at 60 yards for the bullet to just stick in him an inch.? And if it was going that slow the sniper would have to aim above Kennedy’s head for the flight curviture to hit him in the back.
@@wishchris Same way the front shooter shot way over Kennedy's head on one, or through the windshield (hole) on another shot, etc.! And a rear shot from the County Records building is far more than 60 yds (180 ft.), more like 300 feet (100 yds.) if near the fatal front right temple shot distance. Hey, we can't guess what caused an under-powered bullet, it just makes the most sense that it happened. Aimed at his mid-head but the underpowered bullet went lower (obviously) and hit in his mid-back! No, not aiming over his head; traveling at 800-1,000 ft/sec is not small, just not 2,000 ft/sec.
Could have been a defective, low-powered round...but no to worry...this scenario did not happen.
@@freeguy77 800 ft a second is still very very fast. It’s not just going to stick in his back a bit. It’s going to go right through him.
10:09 so why did it not go now
To ballistics?
Was it found like the one from the depository ? 10:30
If you're actually seeking the truth of what happened 'JFK and the Unspeakable' by Douglass and 'Last Word' by Lane are two great books on the topic.
I have that book, but you should read "The Girl on the Stairs" David Belin (commission lawyer interviewing people in Dallas) actually changed her testimony from what she said and didn't even bother to interview Sandra Styles who was with her. If what she said happened and it did, that means Oswald could not have been on the 6th floor that day coming down the stairs to get to the 2nd floor lunch room.
@@tomvan6008 Of course he didn't do it. He himself said he was a patsy. He knew he was being set up to take the fall. That's why he had to be eliminated before he could have a trial. He was a sheep dipped patsy.
I will check that book out. Thank you for the suggestion.
@@tomvan6008 And that's what many people don't understand: that witnesses did speak up and were silenced... some for good. The people doing the "investigation", like Allen Dulles, were leading the investigation when he should've been investigated himself. He was fired by the man and then leads the investigation into the hit.
@@tomvan6008 That wasn't the only testimony the Warren Commission changed to try to put forth the lie of it being Oswald, acting alone. The Warren Commission's job was to obscure the truth, not to reveal it. Another example is the phony theory that the bullet that hit JFK in the back continued into John Connally, which was put forward by Commission lawyer Arlen Specter, later a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania.
Two of the worst!...Read Case Closed, and then read the most researched, truthful book of them all, "Reclaiming History" by the late, great Vincent Bugliosi...He really hashed everything out...and in that book, he mentions that he knew that in the future, other bogus facts and books will be made. You see, conspiracy books sell way better than truthful books!
He knows there was more than one shooter, he just wants to stay alive.
this is an advertisement to sell a book. boo. not news.
There is that…
"this is an advertisement to sell a book. boo. not news"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... in your opinion. People interested in this history consider it highly newsworthy. You sound very young. Go back to playing video games.
@@kenthompson5723 i dont play video games aye. ty for calling me young.
Why has this information never came out before
Because there was no book to sell
We will never know what really happened there. But thanks for sharing with us.
We actually DO know what happened...stop being lazy, do some reading.
Who was that tv anchor on the phone repeating the spokesman’s statement?
Frank McGee
Thank you.
He was very calm & professional.
I looked him up & read that he continually reported for 48 hours on the assassination.
I remember this day so well even though I was just a young girl. It's one of those days I will never forget as 911, Space Shuttle Columbia, Jan 6th , Covid 19 etc. Times of fear, pain, sorrow and shock to America and the world. 😢🙏🇺🇸
Jan 6th??
I was in 4th grade and remember it all, too. So shocking. I don’t think we’ll ever know the truth. I believe many people were privy to the plans that were made to accomplish this. Was Oswald to be paid for his part in this? I don’t believe he was the real shooter. I think he was going to be blamed for something that couldn’t have taken place as people said.
@valeriesuttonpayne7413 I completely believe young Biden was a part of it. The reason?? JFK Jr. Wrote a letter dated 8/26/94 stating Biden was a traitor to his country and family.
Bill Cooper showed the missing footage. The DRIVER shot him from over his shoulder. It was a Masonic Skull & bones hit job by BUSH who are Skull & Bones masons. LOOK at the symbolism. Same with Towers. Look at that masonic ceremony afterwards. Jackie was holding red roses(Death) & afterwards yellow roses(friendship) were scattered on the back seat of the car. HOW many decades & no on noticed it? How about the assassination took place on the 33 parallel & an obelisk was put up on the roadside. Washington D.C.=A MASONIC TALMUDIC Satanic circus... Masonic symbolism crawling all over Diana death too. Its so in your face but Sheeple cant see through the SPELLS.
@@HapticFrequencies January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol
The one thing he said that I truly believe is that he couldn't look at the President's head or he would have passed out.
If he's convinced that there were only 3 shots because of the 3 shells on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository.... then let's count the shots. 1) the one in his back that they says is this pristine bullet that fell out onto the rear seat 2) the one that hit JFK in the neck (although there was no bullet hole in back of his neck)that then did acrobatics hitting Connelly in his back breaking a rib n then his wrist n ending up in his leg 3) the head shot that exploded JFK'S head... so there's the 3 shots... but.. what about the shot that missed the car and hit the curb in between Main n Commerce that struck Mr Teage in the cheek... that would be 4 shots. By the Zapuder film there would not have been enough time for one shooter to fire 4 shots ... hmm.
as I pointed out above to another commenter you forgot the bullet that was found in the grass near the manhole cover across from the GK. A man in a business suit was photographed putting it into his pant pocket.
The young doctor at the head of the exam table said he saw a small exit wound in Kennedy's neck, see his recent interview. This might have been Oswald's second shot. The shot at Connally probably had to be another, or the third. The first might have been a wild miss, chipping the curb, reasonable to assume if Oswald fired too soon. Was Oswald preparing to fire a 4th round, the Carcano having a 4-round magazine? The fatal shot, the last, appears to be from the front, from behind the fence area, see newsreel footage of people running up to and facing the grassy knoll. Was Oswald's job to set a pattern and rhythm of shots to mask the sound of a second shooter, audio witnesses reporting the last 2 shots came close together, Was Oswald aware of this or did he think he was going to be the hero and accomplish all this by himself? Did all this finally sink in when he said he was a patsy? A lot of questions here. Very strange that he would state there were only 3 shots and then sticking with the WC report conclusion even after revealing this additional evidence indicating the possibility of an additional shooter.
First shot was deflected by tree branches and seen disintegrating on the road in a spray of dust.
Second shot has to have gone through both victims, the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body. Their reactions in Zapruder's film clearly show they are hit at the same instant.
Third shot of course hit Kennedy in the head and a fragment of that bullet is what hit Tague.
@@bernieschiff5919 Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind.
Autopsy shows the shot came from behind and Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
No bullets or fragments were ever found that don't match to Oswald's rifle.
Anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy knoll fence would be absurdly obvious and very visible.
Nobody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
Officer Haygood, as he firmly testified, parked his bike at the base of the knoll and raced up it to secure the area, finding nothing and nobody. People saw him, assumed he must be chasing somebody, and this sparked a rush of followers. Behind the fence, they were all filmed milling aimlessly around with nothing to see.
We all know who did it and that Dulles ordered it, but shame on this guy for not coming forward sooner.
I think David Ben Gurion 'ordered it'
I believe him. He disclosed this once before but it did not get picked up in the media.
It makes more sense than the magic bullet theory.
But it's strange that he wouldn't say anything about it to his colleagues.
Single bullet theory is backed up by evidence.
This guy's story is contradicted by evidence.
@@aaronz7056 It's still a theory, there still could have been four shots. Two witnesses claim the pristine bullet was from Kennedy.
@@aaronz7056 Actually two eye witness claim that the clean bullet came from Kennedy not Connolly.
There are no eye witnesses that saw a pristine bullet removed from Connolly or on his stretcher.
An attendant noticed the bullet on a stretcher when he was wheeling down another stretcher to the emergency entrance level. He did not know whose stretcher the bullet was on. To make the single bullet theory work, that bullet had to be connected to Connolly.
I just don't believe the pristine bullet went through the two men.
If one bullet went through Kennedy's neck and through Connolly , it would be greatly fragmented, not nearly whole.
It is plausible imo that one bullet went through both of them, but it wasn't the pristine bullet.
How many shots?
The street light metal arm after bringing it down after how many years.? 3:36
Why put the bullet onto the gurney if you were trying to protect the evidence?😮