They didn't enjoy them much since WW I but a lot of militaries still use unarmored or only partially armored trucks to get troops to battle. The problem is when the battle comes to you and your still in the back of a lightly armored truck.
@@jlokison well as advanced anti armor weapons and resurgent of old anti tank rifle used to attack apcs and turning them into armored coffin in our planet, it is not bad idea.
It’s a nice touch that the AT-M6 has cable-cutters on it’s legs, that one detail alone really conveys how the First Order has had to actually learn from the Empire’s mistakes, and actually makes it come across as believable redesign unlike a lot of the other First Order tech which just felt like an attempt to make it like the Empire but different. congrats to whichever concept artist put that detail in
It's really not, tow cables killed one ATAT, just because we saw it in a movie doesn't mean it was commonplace, and even still the snow speeders needed cables because they weren't equipped with the weapons of a starfighter
@purpleowlanimation just because the legs are a weakness does not mean tripping them was the common reason. Tracks on tanks are a weakness because they can be blown up easily not because rocks and logs have been used in the past to destroy them (which is very rare, and can't be relied apon, like tripping a walker)
Couple of suggestions: -Every Starfighter used by the Republic/Resistance/Rebellion -Every speeder bike (if there even are that many, idk) -Every Mon Calamari cruiser. -Any FO ships bigger than like a shuttle. -Every blaster used by the Republic/rebellion/resistance. A few suggestions but apart from that, keep up the great work. Your videos have been a nice distraction from the world at the moment.
Before anyone starts complaining about how the Empire and First Order just make every new walker bigger than the last, let's just remember that the Fallen Order / Rebels AT-AT is bigger than the Empire Strikes Back AT-AT; the AT-ST is smaller than the AT-DT from Solo, and the older AT-DP; and while the Juggernaut Tank is half the size of the AT-M6, it's twice its length; and the AT-ACT and SPHA-T are a similar height to the AT-M6 as well.
People have measured the scale in the movies based on the humans near it. It's smaller. The idea that it's bigger is when you assume it's legs and body are the same chassis as the at-St and the only difference is the head (and then it's only slightly bigger)
UA-TT is definitely my favorite, I Kath really love the idea of a sort of swat van with legs, which is essentially what it is. And the arm is unique and absolutely awesome.
Personally, I would actually prefer that we see a couple of Imperial walkers instead, with a splash of red paint; like the AT-DT, or the AT-AT from Fallen Order.
@@mitchellhayward6492 I feel like those wouldn't be in production yet but it'd still be pretty cool. I suppose AT-ATs were seen just 5 years after the end of the Clone Wars, so it's not too much of a stretch.
@@jackrutledgegoembel5896 You'd be surprised how long military hardware tends to last, especially in the real world. By the 2040's, production of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers will end after it started being produced in the late 80's. That'll be over 50 years of production. And who knows how long after that it will be before they even get phased out? Back to Star Wars though; by the Clone Wars, the Republic was basically already the Empire - just not in name. So I feel like seeing AT-AT's and Imperial-class Star Destroyers as such in the Republic military is a nice bit of foreshadowing, so long as at the time they are considered state-of-the-art and brand new; and uncommon, but already slated for mass-production. And yeah, the Sequels are rightly criticized for its lack of new and creative vehicle concepts. But at the same time, technologically, it's not unrealistic that they still used AT-AT's and TIE Fighters after all these years. Although I totally believe that the Sequel Trilogy's undoing was its lack of creativity and new ideas.
The AT-ST carries the Vader/Stormtrooper Imperial look on it's head cab view ports with the soul less robotic look and that's partly why as a soldier are the most intimadating walker to confront. They're large , good firepower, but more nimble than either the AT-TE or AT-AT.
I like how they were able to create a safeguard against trip wires but creating a safeguard for their super weapons that doesn't cause it to blow up from one shot it's still something that eludes them.
The AT-ST was the first walker I saw (yeah, my dad showed me VI before V as a kid) and I always found them terrifying. Something about that "face" they have with those front windows. An AT-AT looks like it's going to ignore you and blow up some high-value target. The AT-ST looks like it has nothing better to do than incinerate you, personally.
When I saw the AT-DT in Solo I thought they were just an early design for the AT-ST. Instead it was basically a Dark Empire design brought to the big screen.
Fun fact: many weapons in star wars are based off of weapons from WW1 and WW2,an good example being the A280 blaster the rebels used,it was based off of the WW2 era STG44,the first assault rifle used in war,and the clone blaster (I forgot the name of the weapon) was based off of a MG34 machine gun. I could go on all day but my fingers are tired of typing.
Great video, but you forgot the OI-CT (we don't know the exact title yet), a kind of imperial walking construction crane seen on Corellia in Solo: A Star Wars Story and in the Darth Vader comic series of 2017/18 on Mustafar where they constructed Vaders castle.
The First Order's walkers are super interesting. I really hope we get some books or comics set during the war against the First Order so we get to see more of the faction in action.
Imagine your exploring some surgeon woods next to a supposedly accent wreck and you stop to take a wizz, and the accent thing that has warpaint on it turns it's light on.
Whoever designed the AT-HS has clearly seen Theo Jansen's 'Strandbeest' wind powered walking sculptures. The legs are a direct reference to one of his mechanisms.
I really like the design of the urban assault triped transport. It reminds a bit of the tripod from war of the worlds. I just wish its gun was bigger. It looks so out of balance. Like the nose has just been cut off and replaced with that. If they could have made it with a gun more like the AT-AP then that would be cool
These are so scary in their own way, AT-STs always terrified me when I played Battlefield, just seeing how fast they were and hearing them getting closer and closer is scary.
I’d say shoot the belly, or repeated starfighter attack runs. Bombers would probably require less attack runs per walker. If you’re talking ground only, however, try to get rocket launcher troops to flank around and hit the joints on the back legs.
IKR do people really say "Atsst", "At TEHH" and "Atrrrrrrrttt" for "AT-ST" "AT-TE" and "AT-RT"? It’s so plainly obvious that it’s 'AT-AT' and not "At At".
I think that is the UA-TT. A shame we couldn’t have gotten a sequence where the resistance fights one. Everything in the sequels is a missed opportunity.
I know the AT at the start of each name is meant to stand for “All Terrain”, but the wording of “AT-walker” makes me imagine a specific manufacturer behind the walkers of the Republic, Empire and First Order, selling walkers through 50 years of war. Business is booming!
I'm pretty sure that the AT-DT is basically a Flak-88 mounted on the legs of an AT-ST. Which if you've ever seen an Flak-88 being fired, you know would be scary even in the Star Wars universe. Slug thrower is an understatement
The First Order should have used the AT-PD, AT-MA, UA-TT, AT-HS, & Mobile Assault Walker in the movies! Not just quick background moments or tie-in media. Not only are they amazing designs, but they would have shut up detractors constantly whining that the new movies didn't utilize enough original designs for the vehicles.
@@damienhailey118 yes. For barely one scene. Which I addressed in my comment. I wish they had been the focus instead of the updated AT-ATs and AT-STs we got shown.
@@orinanime That's pretty par for the course for Star Wars. I'm pretty sure the AT-ST first appears in ESB for all of five seconds total, ditto the AT-AP and AT-OT in RotS. In fact, that one picture for the AT-OT nearly it's ONLY appearance in the entire Canon. And it didn't get much more in Legends.
@@damienhailey118 the AT-ST appearance in ESB doesn't matter because it shows up for the entire third act of ROTJ. The problem with the new designs is that they don't even get the ESB minute appearance. They get a "blink and you'll miss it" shot. So... I find your attempt at comparison flawed.
@@orinanime I find your lack of understanding... Disturbing. My point is that a *lot* of the stuff in the movies Not just walkers, but ships, vehicles, people, only show up for a few seconds in the background. Then it gets re-used and fleshed the hell out in the Expanded Universe. I mean, look at Aurra Sing and Quinlan Vos, who only appeared as background extras in The Phantom Menace, but were major players in the Legends Expanded Universe. Look at B-Wing fighters. Remember the storm that flurried up from the use of the Blade Wing in Rebels? How they said the B-Wing shouldn't that big beam cannons? Even though the B-Wing *is never shown firing a shot* in Return of the Jedi? A lot of what we know about machines in the Star Wars saga is more secondhand than you think. The issue is that the mechanical designers can give use these weapons all they like, but it's up to the writers and directors to use them. I mean, I would have loved to have had a scene where Rey, Finn, and Poe had to fight off a UA-TT with it's hand crashing through walls to snap at them, or an NR-N99 Tank Droid fighting during the Clone Wars, or like I just mentioned, a B-Wing in actual action. I actually agree with your desire to see more of the vehicles of the game in action. I'm just saying it's not a new issue.
Excuse me but I believe we are forgetting about another clone wars walker first seen during order 66 when Jedi master Ki-Adi-Mundi was killed. It was called the UT-AT or Unstable artillery armored transport.
He's doing a list of all the cannon AT: All Terrain vehicles. But but the one you mentioned AT stands for Artillery Transport. & "Instead of legs," the UT-AT featured 16 low-power repulsorlift skis"
6:04 actually i think that was in TROS in that scene when poe talks to whats-her-name on the roof, for one second i saw a spider looking thing out of the corner of my eye
you missed the Mountain Terrain Armored Transport (MT-AT) from legends, also known as the spider walker. (look in source book for reference or just Google it)
When i was a 1st grader my school had a star wars info book about the vehicles and stuff. One of them was "kana kävelijä" and that translates to chicken walker, that was the funniest sh*t 1st grader me saw and it was one of the 2 legged walker.
Why have legs at all. They could have made them be able to fly. Think about it. The AT-AT Walker is the mighty weapon of the Empire which can be outpaced by an elderly man using a walker and which can be taken down by a highly motivated infantryman armed with a spool of yarn. Given the existence of Land Speeders and Jaba's floating pleasure barge, you would think the geniuses who built the Death Star would have made floating armored attack vehicles...after all, the Trade Federation had flying tanks decades before during the Phantom Menace.
AT-OT: Troop transport with an open top.
Yeah, I'm sure the troops loved that one...
They didn't enjoy them much since WW I but a lot of militaries still use unarmored or only partially armored trucks to get troops to battle. The problem is when the battle comes to you and your still in the back of a lightly armored truck.
@@jlokison well as advanced anti armor weapons and resurgent of old anti tank rifle used to attack apcs and turning them into armored coffin in our planet, it is not bad idea.
Separatists: *laugh in mortars*
We back in Normandy boys
They can fire from the top
regardless how you feel about the movie/trilogy as a whole, the all terrain megacaliber 6 are _absolute units_
The AT-M6 might just be the epitome of "sequel escalation" and I love it. It's literally the equivalent of sticking a naval gun to a tank.
Search up at-sp. Then you'll see what an absolute unit looks like
@@eli5138 holy- that walker is so big! Damnn. That comparison with the at-at left me cold
@@eli5138 that's...a lot of guns. o_o
I think it looks kinda sick
It’s a nice touch that the AT-M6 has cable-cutters on it’s legs, that one detail alone really conveys how the First Order has had to actually learn from the Empire’s mistakes, and actually makes it come across as believable redesign unlike a lot of the other First Order tech which just felt like an attempt to make it like the Empire but different. congrats to whichever concept artist put that detail in
It's really not, tow cables killed one ATAT, just because we saw it in a movie doesn't mean it was commonplace, and even still the snow speeders needed cables because they weren't equipped with the weapons of a starfighter
@PurpleOwlAnimation the weakness of a nuclear bunker is the thinnest part of it's armor, doesn't mean it's weak
@purpleowlanimation just because the legs are a weakness does not mean tripping them was the common reason.
Tracks on tanks are a weakness because they can be blown up easily not because rocks and logs have been used in the past to destroy them (which is very rare, and can't be relied apon, like tripping a walker)
Thats awesome i didnt know that. What a cool bit of lore.
The old AT-AT and AT-ST will always hold special places in my heart.
(The Dark Side)
Is that supposed to be a joke or do you actually disliked them?
Nothing beats the classics
Word
"@@andrein_501st." 👍
The AT-ST just seems derpy to me.
Top Hat Joe Seeing as you can hit it with very big sticks and smash it to bits, I agree.
The UA-TT looks interesting as hell!
It looks like an absolute unit
There should be an official lego on it
Simp
@@banished-om4eu yes please
@@banished-om4eu yessir
Couple of suggestions:
-Every Starfighter used by the Republic/Resistance/Rebellion
-Every speeder bike (if there even are that many, idk)
-Every Mon Calamari cruiser.
-Any FO ships bigger than like a shuttle.
-Every blaster used by the Republic/rebellion/resistance.
A few suggestions but apart from that, keep up the great work. Your videos have been a nice distraction from the world at the moment.
Didn't every single Mon Calamari Cruiser have unique designs?
Also, every ship in the climactic battle in The Rise of Skywalker please.
@@Compucles there were specific classes of Mon Cala Cruisers, but each one was technically unique with how its Pods were placed on the ship
Oh man, would Grand Moff Tarkin be proud to see the UA-TT. Fitting right into his doctrine.
UA-TT Pilot: "Ha ha Rebel scum go squish"
Boisegang Rebels: “You can’t destroy our homes and take people!”
UA-TT Pilot: “Ha Ha Arm break wall and abduct tiny man.”
Thank you for mentioning the UA-TT, after seeing a new walker in the background of EP 9 but not a good look at it, I was really curious about it!
LEGOeatPok yes, me too
I thought it was a first order AT ST until I realised it has 3 legs. I was like "wtf"
@@ilikepigeons6101 that’s not a leg, that’s the protestor squisher 5000
@@dimitris2936 6000*
We don’t talk about the 5000
@@yourfriendlyneighbourhoodb7585 i don't get it am I missing something
Before anyone starts complaining about how the Empire and First Order just make every new walker bigger than the last, let's just remember that the Fallen Order / Rebels AT-AT is bigger than the Empire Strikes Back AT-AT; the AT-ST is smaller than the AT-DT from Solo, and the older AT-DP; and while the Juggernaut Tank is half the size of the AT-M6, it's twice its length; and the AT-ACT and SPHA-T are a similar height to the AT-M6 as well.
Mitchell acronym Hayward.....👍👌👍
The at dt was half the height of an at st
@@ghineas5410 Not according to what I've read, but it certainly looks like it should be shorter.
People have measured the scale in the movies based on the humans near it. It's smaller. The idea that it's bigger is when you assume it's legs and body are the same chassis as the at-St and the only difference is the head (and then it's only slightly bigger)
UA-TT is definitely my favorite, I Kath really love the idea of a sort of swat van with legs, which is essentially what it is. And the arm is unique and absolutely awesome.
same they are awesome
I hope we see the walkers in this final season that we only saw in ROTS.
Personally, I would actually prefer that we see a couple of Imperial walkers instead, with a splash of red paint; like the AT-DT, or the AT-AT from Fallen Order.
@@mitchellhayward6492 They could also have given the Juggernaut more time to shine.
@@mitchellhayward6492 I feel like those wouldn't be in production yet but it'd still be pretty cool. I suppose AT-ATs were seen just 5 years after the end of the Clone Wars, so it's not too much of a stretch.
@@jackrutledgegoembel5896 You'd be surprised how long military hardware tends to last, especially in the real world. By the 2040's, production of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers will end after it started being produced in the late 80's. That'll be over 50 years of production. And who knows how long after that it will be before they even get phased out?
Back to Star Wars though; by the Clone Wars, the Republic was basically already the Empire - just not in name. So I feel like seeing AT-AT's and Imperial-class Star Destroyers as such in the Republic military is a nice bit of foreshadowing, so long as at the time they are considered state-of-the-art and brand new; and uncommon, but already slated for mass-production.
And yeah, the Sequels are rightly criticized for its lack of new and creative vehicle concepts. But at the same time, technologically, it's not unrealistic that they still used AT-AT's and TIE Fighters after all these years. Although I totally believe that the Sequel Trilogy's undoing was its lack of creativity and new ideas.
The juggernaut tank would be gud
The AT-ST carries the Vader/Stormtrooper Imperial look on it's head cab view ports with the soul less robotic look and that's partly why as a soldier are the most intimadating walker to confront. They're large , good firepower, but more nimble than either the AT-TE or AT-AT.
The at-at in fallen order can carry a speeder bike
Both the fallen order and empire strikes back AT-AT's Can
@@sammypines1837 ok
And the empire strikes back AT
At has two floors for troops
@@jessupm3377 ok
Hello there
ICEBEAR PLAYS general Kenobi you are a bold one
Most of the empire vehicles are canon thanks to the RIP star wars commander
miss that game
@@Lttsumm I loved it and I really miss
I wish we saw the AT-HS instead of an upgraded AT-ST and I wish we saw the AT-MA instead of an upgraded AT-AT in TLJ.
I was thinking that exact same thing
Same
Agreed especially since I bought 3 at-hs lego sets that never made an appearance
same
TLJ wouldn’t have done it justice though let’s be honest.
I like how they were able to create a safeguard against trip wires but creating a safeguard for their super weapons that doesn't cause it to blow up from one shot it's still something that eludes them.
Would it be possible to list and describe the different types of stormtroopers? There just seem to be too many to really keep track of
He saw shadow troopers in Star Wars battlefront and that semi cannon.
Imagine being killed by a non-combat walker
Ironic.
Step
Like getting crushed by an at-to or something
The troop transport with 8 legs
@@MattMan7395 ATOT had weapons on it
Designers: how many ww2 weapons do you want as a model for the walkers?
Lucasfilm and literally everyone in the EU: YES
Well I can only think of the AT-DT as ww2 since it is literally a modified 88 flak
Star Wars commander is canon so when it shuts down we need to remember everything in it ok folks?
Roger Roger
Unnecessary. Wookieepedia has already catalogued at all.
The only reason it exist is because somebody, @Mitchell Howell, wanted to add an Easter egg.
Yeah I’m so sad about the game shutting down I was playing since it’s release 😢
The at-pt wasn't featured in commander, so how is it canon?
The AT-ST was the first walker I saw (yeah, my dad showed me VI before V as a kid) and I always found them terrifying. Something about that "face" they have with those front windows. An AT-AT looks like it's going to ignore you and blow up some high-value target. The AT-ST looks like it has nothing better to do than incinerate you, personally.
The AT-DT is literally just a WWII German 88mm Flak 37 stuck on an AT-STs legs.
And I think that was cool. I saw it when saw the movie and was like "oooooooooohhhhhhhhhh"
Classic Star Wars, take a WW2 German weapon and weld some greeblies on :)
When I saw the AT-DT in Solo I thought they were just an early design for the AT-ST. Instead it was basically a Dark Empire design brought to the big screen.
Fun fact: many weapons in star wars are based off of weapons from WW1 and WW2,an good example being the A280 blaster the rebels used,it was based off of the WW2 era STG44,the first assault rifle used in war,and the clone blaster (I forgot the name of the weapon) was based off of a MG34 machine gun. I could go on all day but my fingers are tired of typing.
It's more look like a Pak 38 or a 57mm Soviet anti-tank
Great video, but you forgot the OI-CT (we don't know the exact title yet),
a kind of imperial walking construction crane seen on Corellia in Solo: A Star Wars Story and in the Darth Vader comic series of 2017/18 on Mustafar where they constructed Vaders castle.
The First Order's walkers are super interesting. I really hope we get some books or comics set during the war against the First Order so we get to see more of the faction in action.
In SW commander there are also enhanced at-st and at-mp, maybe they are the missing mk II
The at act in SW commander is op it can kill a shield in two shots at level 10
Imagine your exploring some surgeon woods next to a supposedly accent wreck and you stop to take a wizz, and the accent thing that has warpaint on it turns it's light on.
Meant to say ancient and this is the AT-ST Raider
Meant to say ancient and this is the AT-ST Raider
The beginning definitely reminded me of BNL’s One Week lol “it’s been...two years since I...” lol
R.I.P Star Wars Commander
You brought many good walkers to canon
And not just the walkers but the darktroopers and the dropships too
Death troopers
Whoever designed the AT-HS has clearly seen Theo Jansen's 'Strandbeest' wind powered walking sculptures. The legs are a direct reference to one of his mechanisms.
MORE! MORE!
P.S. Thank you for this type of videos, for me they are just very relaxing)
Whenever he says Star Wars Commander, makes me sad.
why?
Jonark Kessen it’s shutting down this summer. Johhar is my favorite hero is the game.
It was a nice game, at least they will put something new, hepefully Star Wars Rise To Power
Imperial Stormtrooper yeah if EA or Disney don’t intend to MESS IT UP!
Same
I really like the design of the urban assault triped transport. It reminds a bit of the tripod from war of the worlds. I just wish its gun was bigger. It looks so out of balance. Like the nose has just been cut off and replaced with that. If they could have made it with a gun more like the AT-AP then that would be cool
These are so scary in their own way, AT-STs always terrified me when I played Battlefield, just seeing how fast they were and hearing them getting closer and closer is scary.
I’m still wondering how to do you take down a at-m6?
Interesting how The entire sequel trilogy we never got to see a single walker taken down.
I think a focused barrage of heavy turbo lasers should do the trick. I don't think any conventional weapons or speeders/starfighters can harm it.
ion disruptors
viper Son even in Battlefront 2 there’s no animation for when you take one of them down.
The canisters on the back are either fuel or energy storage for the cannon, so I reckon a few shots with an ion torpedo should do the trick
I’d say shoot the belly, or repeated starfighter attack runs. Bombers would probably require less attack runs per walker. If you’re talking ground only, however, try to get rocket launcher troops to flank around and hit the joints on the back legs.
YESSSSSSSSS A NEW VIDEO ON VEHICLES!!!!!!!
The AT-HS was actually used by the first order during the battle of Crait. Although it was not seen in the movie.
Props to starwars commander for making most of these canon
I loved playing star wars command it basically made legends canon
I love the First Order AT-AT and AT-ST. The First Order did such a good job improving the technology and weaponry they had under The Empire.
Do a mega video on every stormtrooper
You forgot the UT-AT which was on Mygeeto in ROTS
I love all the Star Wars Commander Vehicles, especially the Mark III variant's and AT-MP
That walker with a flak 88 just yeeted on it is something
Please! Do a list of Starfighters and Capital ships of the Old Republic Era!
To anyone who pronounces AT-AT "at at" how do you pronounce AT-ST
“a-t-s-t”
The AT-ACT when first time star wars fans saw it probably pronounced it "at act"
"AT-Szht"
"At-stuh"
IKR do people really say "Atsst", "At TEHH" and "Atrrrrrrrttt" for "AT-ST" "AT-TE" and "AT-RT"? It’s so plainly obvious that it’s 'AT-AT' and not "At At".
0:46 it's not the all terrain attack pod, but the all terrain artillery pod!
I swear the first order had a new walker patrolling Kijimi
That was the UA-TT that's mentioned in the video
That would be the Urban Assault Triped Transport. It’s the First Order's riot control option between an infantryman and a Star Destroyer.
Marcel Kurz thanks, don’t know how I missed that 😂
What about the walker we briefly see on Kijimi in TROS?
I think that is the UA-TT. A shame we couldn’t have gotten a sequence where the resistance fights one. Everything in the sequels is a missed opportunity.
Star Wars commander is making everything canon
Yes yes it is
I know the AT at the start of each name is meant to stand for “All Terrain”, but the wording of “AT-walker” makes me imagine a specific manufacturer behind the walkers of the Republic, Empire and First Order, selling walkers through 50 years of war.
Business is booming!
In solo during the mimban battle a walker can be scene the has the legs of a at-st but has a artelery cannon that looks like a flak 88 for armament.
It still bothers me that in the original trilogy they only call AT-ATs “imperial walkers”
I'm pretty sure that the AT-DT is basically a Flak-88 mounted on the legs of an AT-ST. Which if you've ever seen an Flak-88 being fired, you know would be scary even in the Star Wars universe. Slug thrower is an understatement
AT-ST : well balanced and upgraded version of its predecesor
AT-ST 2 : Minigun noises*
I love how the first order had these sick ass vehicles in the background of the force awakens and we never saw them again
I love these types of videos
Thanks
3:56 Star Wars explained: idk if this Counts has a new variant
me: what do you mean it is a new variant
AT-M6 what an awesome looking machine.
Agreed.
This compilation is so thorough, good job!
Empire: I have ALL TERRAIN armored weapons!
Forest Moon of Endor: ALL terrain you say?
The First Order should have used the AT-PD, AT-MA, UA-TT, AT-HS, & Mobile Assault Walker in the movies!
Not just quick background moments or tie-in media.
Not only are they amazing designs, but they would have shut up detractors constantly whining that the new movies didn't utilize enough original designs for the vehicles.
The UA-TT *was* in TRoS.
@@damienhailey118 yes. For barely one scene.
Which I addressed in my comment.
I wish they had been the focus instead of the updated AT-ATs and AT-STs we got shown.
@@orinanime That's pretty par for the course for Star Wars. I'm pretty sure the AT-ST first appears in ESB for all of five seconds total, ditto the AT-AP and AT-OT in RotS. In fact, that one picture for the AT-OT nearly it's ONLY appearance in the entire Canon. And it didn't get much more in Legends.
@@damienhailey118 the AT-ST appearance in ESB doesn't matter because it shows up for the entire third act of ROTJ.
The problem with the new designs is that they don't even get the ESB minute appearance.
They get a "blink and you'll miss it" shot.
So... I find your attempt at comparison flawed.
@@orinanime I find your lack of understanding... Disturbing.
My point is that a *lot* of the stuff in the movies Not just walkers, but ships, vehicles, people, only show up for a few seconds in the background. Then it gets re-used and fleshed the hell out in the Expanded Universe. I mean, look at Aurra Sing and Quinlan Vos, who only appeared as background extras in The Phantom Menace, but were major players in the Legends Expanded Universe. Look at B-Wing fighters. Remember the storm that flurried up from the use of the Blade Wing in Rebels? How they said the B-Wing shouldn't that big beam cannons? Even though the B-Wing *is never shown firing a shot* in Return of the Jedi?
A lot of what we know about machines in the Star Wars saga is more secondhand than you think. The issue is that the mechanical designers can give use these weapons all they like, but it's up to the writers and directors to use them. I mean, I would have loved to have had a scene where Rey, Finn, and Poe had to fight off a UA-TT with it's hand crashing through walls to snap at them, or an NR-N99 Tank Droid fighting during the Clone Wars, or like I just mentioned, a B-Wing in actual action. I actually agree with your desire to see more of the vehicles of the game in action. I'm just saying it's not a new issue.
Would love to see a every tank vid!
AT RT is my fav, i just love its flexibility and fearful stand
There was also a AT-KT (All Terrain Kashyyyk Transport) showed in The Force Unleashed
Not canon
I love using the at-st in battlefront 2.
Excuse me but I believe we are forgetting about another clone wars walker first seen during order 66 when Jedi master Ki-Adi-Mundi was killed. It was called the UT-AT or Unstable artillery armored transport.
Great video Alex 🙂
Appreciate that you mentioned my favourite star wars game in star wars commander. Great game. Shame it's been shut down.
Can you pls make a all stormtrooper canon/legends video pls pls pls pls pls pls
OH MY GOD THANK YOU!!!!!
Woo i requested this
What about the crane walker from Solo and The Fortress Vader Comics?
You always forget about the UT-AT. It’s not even a hard one to find, it’s got it’s own shot in ROTS during Order 66!
It's not walker though. It's a repulsorlift craft.
Joe Kerr It didn’t used to be
He's doing a list of all the cannon AT: All Terrain vehicles. But but the one you mentioned AT stands for
Artillery Transport. & "Instead of legs," the UT-AT featured 16 low-power repulsorlift skis"
Dan 23 He also mentioned several others that didn’t have AT in the name at all
@@ThePropeople just look at the name of the video. It's every AT-Walker type. The vehicle you talk about isn't a walker.
I've always wondered who was the person behind the original production concept for the Imperial Walker
They made the *AT HE , AT AA , AT CT , AT KT and the AT ST/Assault* canon.
I like this videos. How come no one watches them???
6:04 actually i think that was in TROS in that scene when poe talks to whats-her-name on the roof, for one second i saw a spider looking thing out of the corner of my eye
you missed the Mountain Terrain Armored Transport (MT-AT) from legends, also known as the spider walker. (look in source book for reference or just Google it)
Thank you for this video I love the walkers
Tthhe AT-AT and AT-M6 will always be my favorite
Great update! Thanks!
Also, Kryze is pronounced "Kreeze." It's said more than once in The Clone Wars.
God In love the M6, shit is so cool
I'm glad the missile platforms are back
The AT-TE is like my favorite vehicle in all of Star Wars.
The AT-Hauler is really a Y45 Transport. I believe it was able to pick up the Troop Transports from Star Wars Rebels.
When i was a 1st grader my school had a star wars info book about the vehicles and stuff.
One of them was "kana kävelijä" and that translates to chicken walker, that was the funniest sh*t 1st grader me saw and it was one of the 2 legged walker.
2:04 That just looks like a Marder III with legs
It's cannon is based off of the German flak 88 cannon and to be honest,it's looks like a failed WW1 tank with chicken legs XD.
@@galladesamurai2380 Ooohhhhh yea. I thought it was a Marder III cos of the gun shield but now looking at the gun it's kinda obvious it's a flak 88
My faves are the At Act and the y45 at hauler which can carry an AtAt. Cmon Hasbro let’s get a hauler
2:24 iconic too
That armor is too strong for blasters
The AT-HS holds a special place…
In my Lego Star Wars collection
ill be 100, I saw this video and thought 'oh sweet a new vid- wait, this is 3 years old, *quiet pandemic sad*'
4:20 F in the chat for Star Wars Commander
You can't go wrong with the original AT-AT and AT-ST, but the UA-TT is pretty awesome.
As much as I hate sw: commander as a game, I love the art style for the walkers. They look more stable and meaner with the thicker legs
You forgot the Hoth AT-ST from episode 5. It has taller legs, a shorter head, and longer guns at the front
I am sorry to tell you this but the AT-ST seen on hoth is a different model of the standard AT-ST. It was used for colder planets like hoth.
Links at the end of the video are dead/not there. Thanks for the overview!
I love how obviously the AT-DT is just a German 88mm Flak gun stuck on a walker frame, classic Star Wars
Why have legs at all. They could have made them be able to fly. Think about it. The AT-AT Walker is the mighty weapon of the Empire which can be outpaced by an elderly man using a walker and which can be taken down by a highly motivated infantryman armed with a spool of yarn. Given the existence of Land Speeders and Jaba's floating pleasure barge, you would think the geniuses who built the Death Star would have made floating armored attack vehicles...after all, the Trade Federation had flying tanks decades before during the Phantom Menace.
Good video. Quick and to the point.
The at act looks so cool to me