Johnny Depp lawyer uses poop story to challenge Amber Heard expert | LiveNOW from FOX

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,3 тис.

  • @ismailhussain3192
    @ismailhussain3192 2 роки тому +3357

    The negative decline in her career happened when the phone recording came out. And even more so when the world found out she didn’t donate the 7 million to charity. Waldman had nothing to do with it.

    • @unkulwilly
      @unkulwilly 2 роки тому +45

      facts

    • @TestTest-ve4ih
      @TestTest-ve4ih 2 роки тому +97

      You got that all wrong. She pledge the 7 millions dollars. Her career is rebounding, it's only a matter of a few decades.

    • @Andy-ph6mf
      @Andy-ph6mf 2 роки тому +22

      @@TestTest-ve4ih lol

    • @KirbySmartsFakePunt
      @KirbySmartsFakePunt 2 роки тому +10

      @@chelsea3564 bless yours for not knowing that's sarcasm

    • @bennemeth382
      @bennemeth382 2 роки тому +11

      actions was and has been her decline

  • @trumpsteinoyvey8583
    @trumpsteinoyvey8583 2 роки тому +671

    Everyone going on about Mrs Vasquez which is cool but this lawyer is badass at slowly dismantling their points, made the male psychiatrist look like a psycho.

    • @Janice_Kinase
      @Janice_Kinase 2 роки тому +8

      He's a far better attorney than Vasquez. She's childish and unprofessional. A lot of the lawyers, on both sides, in this trial are very unprofessional, but Vasquez is probably the worst.

    • @bees6416
      @bees6416 2 роки тому +14

      Could you imagine needing psychiatric help and being put in front of this opinionated ,argumentative individual .You would want drugs just yo get through it.

    • @flippineck2825
      @flippineck2825 2 роки тому +111

      @@Janice_Kinase you're completely wrong. Her style is to bait them into standing by a statement that they've previously contradicted then present them with the contradiction.
      When you are learning this type of interrogation, you learn that if you are getting under the skin of the witness then they let their story slip in favour of trying to fight you. Emotions take over.

    • @Ranbowriter
      @Ranbowriter 2 роки тому +13

      @@flippineck2825 YES

    • @pookie637
      @pookie637 2 роки тому +16

      @@Janice_Kinase I’m actually interested in why you think so? Do you mind elaborating?

  • @anaromello
    @anaromello 2 роки тому +127

    This guy is brilliant, so confident, experienced and able to guide the witnesses to the truth. Johnny has the best legal team. They're so enjoyable to watch.

  • @raeishimura
    @raeishimura 2 роки тому +2128

    The lawyer here is quietly brilliant. The light stutter is actually very disarming. It gives people this idea that they can take him less seriously, and this man wields it like a freaking weapon. His soft spoken method and light speech impediment is just the mask over a razor wit and master legal cunning. Honestly, I was shocked how well he performed after first hearing him speak.

    • @tonyg6968
      @tonyg6968 2 роки тому +156

      💢well said. At first I thought in the negative description you said first. But it dawned on me that it seems more tactical and controlled than just randomly used. After reading your comment, it made much more sense that is exactly what is happening. He is extremely brilliant and well prepared. Well done on your assessment

    • @GraceDollesin
      @GraceDollesin 2 роки тому +135

      Thank you. I’ve been trying to say that myself. I think that his style . He’s a smooth operator. Johnny’s team is a “TURDANATOR “!

    • @GhostFV2025
      @GhostFV2025 2 роки тому +17

      I agree

    • @tdoug8312
      @tdoug8312 2 роки тому +106

      Right. He basically got her to prove why Amber should not be recieving the amount she sued for even If she can win this case. Amber set herself up, she underestimated Johnny's lawyers. They are using her own "experts" against her while proving their expertise to be unreliable.

    • @shamusshamus6251
      @shamusshamus6251 2 роки тому +90

      a bit like columbo , they underestimate him when in fact he is sharp as a tack

  • @james5460
    @james5460 2 роки тому +807

    "Waldman didn't talk about defecation." He very cleverly trapped her, that was a very good piece of lawyering.

  • @intothemountainsofmadness
    @intothemountainsofmadness 2 роки тому +182

    Just having Depp’s attorney say “Amber Turd” in front of her with a full courtroom was everything 🤣🤣🤣

    • @bmyra
      @bmyra 2 роки тому +11

      I know! How did everyone not bust out laughing?

    • @intothemountainsofmadness
      @intothemountainsofmadness 2 роки тому +6

      @@bmyra I’m sure they were laughing behind the cameras.

    • @stacyward4309
      @stacyward4309 Рік тому +6

      I like "flush the turd' also!

    • @SCSA3.16
      @SCSA3.16 Рік тому +1

      @@stacyward4309 what about Aquaturd?

  • @PM-xj5fp
    @PM-xj5fp 2 роки тому +1930

    An expert witness that doesn’t know Robert Patterson is the new Batman, doesn’t know who Patrick Wilson is, doesn’t know of AH prior movies but knows that aquaman made a lot of money although fails to realize it was because of Jason, not Amber. Fantastic “expert” witness

    • @bledig
      @bledig 2 роки тому +45

      Also the stand is a flop!! With only 28 mil budget. Lol. Joke

    • @ashamedashley389
      @ashamedashley389 2 роки тому +38

      lol I guess you also dont know him very well cuz his name is Robert Pattinson.

    • @LI-vt2kf
      @LI-vt2kf 2 роки тому +81

      @@ashamedashley389 the commentator certainly still knows more than Amber‘s so called „expert“.

    • @zulygirl4412
      @zulygirl4412 2 роки тому +4

      Sounds like a guy with a life.

    • @kayeherrera3821
      @kayeherrera3821 2 роки тому +2

      Yes about Jayson big box office stair not the other person come on now

  • @____kd
    @____kd 2 роки тому +378

    Girl they literally teach correlation doesn’t equal causation in HIGH SCHOOL, how as a full grown “career professional” do you not know that?!

    • @golpop
      @golpop 2 роки тому +15

      social media professional never took intro to psychology

    • @melissamoonchild9216
      @melissamoonchild9216 2 роки тому +22

      She's not an expert in semantics? Like.OK? So you don't understand the words or what?

    • @apf312
      @apf312 2 роки тому +7

      Exactly!!! This is basic information! What exactly is is she an expert in?

    • @californiacupcake8580
      @californiacupcake8580 2 роки тому +5

      Seems more like she’s a huge fan of Lumber Turd like damn 🤣

    • @lunarcalendar368
      @lunarcalendar368 2 роки тому +6

      @@golpop that doesn't come only in psychology, it appears in almost every field. Science, law, maths etc.

  • @IceQueen165
    @IceQueen165 2 роки тому +831

    This lady has made a fool of herself. She literally tried to bluff her way through. She just remembered what she was supposed to and didn’t have a clue about anything else. How embarrassing. Half of AH witnesses have done more damage then good.

    • @thebeardedbudgettraveler6871
      @thebeardedbudgettraveler6871 2 роки тому +2

      Take it your team amber

    • @IceQueen165
      @IceQueen165 2 роки тому +10

      @@thebeardedbudgettraveler6871 absolutely not

    • @honeybee6858
      @honeybee6858 2 роки тому +16

      It cracks me up that she didn’t know she wasn’t in blade

    • @IceQueen165
      @IceQueen165 2 роки тому +10

      @@honeybee6858 highlight of the day was the lawyer asking the DR if he watched Willy wonker 😂😂 🤦🏼‍♀️ the guys horse lips 😂

    • @overcompensation5354
      @overcompensation5354 2 роки тому +19

      Not knowing who Alice Eve was or that Chris Pine was Captain Kirk. I thought she was an expert on Hollywood.

  • @fooshfoosh
    @fooshfoosh 2 роки тому +880

    I don't think this lawyer has been objected to once during this entire trial. He's too good.

    • @heresjohnny999
      @heresjohnny999 2 роки тому +206

      he sounds kind of nervous and soft when he talks but actually he is a stone cold killer, he is very good. his demeanour makes you think he is not...at first.

    • @Berkmugga
      @Berkmugga 2 роки тому +33

      One might say he’s got a speech impediment.
      Also they have him do the more minor parts of the trial and witnesses. It’s less contentious. Had they had him cross Amber or Johnny there would have been a lot more activity from opposite counsel.

    • @cristinaaguilar9334
      @cristinaaguilar9334 2 роки тому +102

      It was a tactic using Camille…woman to a woman. He is great with grilling this witnesses and Camille was also a killer during her cross on AH. They make an excellent team

    • @jkim356
      @jkim356 2 роки тому +74

      He's a partner at the law firm representing Johnny, so this guy must be very well versed in trial.

    • @thesummerland6165
      @thesummerland6165 2 роки тому +46

      Dennison is stellar, as is Waldman, Chew, Vasquez, Curry!!!

  • @michaelevans580
    @michaelevans580 2 роки тому +1920

    Amber is one of the strangest people I've ever heard of. Any decline in her popularity and acting career is because of her own doing, and something she'll never take responsibility for. The reason this trial is taking place and exposing what she's really like is her own fault because of the false accusations and lies she's made.

    • @kandycepeterson2482
      @kandycepeterson2482 2 роки тому +49

      But amber continues to drag it out making it worse for herself, battling ever step of the way, gaslighting the world. She should have settled so the defacation didn't come out. That all on herself.

    • @athena6832
      @athena6832 2 роки тому +56

      She could be sitting pretty with that seven million right now but instead she's going to have to pay the charities AND owe Johnny($50million??) 😆

    • @tudywittlake1072
      @tudywittlake1072 2 роки тому +46

      She is not a good actress. Low grade movies is all she is good for. This is my own opinion.

    • @donnareeweeks6180
      @donnareeweeks6180 2 роки тому +26

      Meghan Markle acts just like her . Both believe their own lies .

    • @SpiritedSoul1986
      @SpiritedSoul1986 2 роки тому +24

      I don't think it's technically gaslighting if it's only working on like 2% of people who are Turd fans. Lol. She's TRYING to gaslight and failing miserably with a large majority of us.

  • @JAW242
    @JAW242 2 роки тому +519

    This guy is brilliant. He’s the true giant on JD’s team. Camille may have more appeal to social media kids but the way this guy operates, spreads his net and traps those ‘experts’ is just genius.

    • @madelinekess8710
      @madelinekess8710 2 роки тому +13

      Yeah I’m in love with him he’s the beeest !!!

    • @vetavadeo6574
      @vetavadeo6574 2 роки тому +17

      I thought the same.

    • @TimmyTurner421
      @TimmyTurner421 2 роки тому +20

      I agree he's a master at what he's doing

    • @pale_saint
      @pale_saint 2 роки тому

      This ”expert” is bullshitter and nice to see her get tangled in the web of her lies

    • @ramjiin1665
      @ramjiin1665 2 роки тому +16

      Not saying dude isn't brilliant, but the witness is a buffoon. She doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation and she doesn't know that if it's true it's not defamation 🤣

  • @karig5568
    @karig5568 2 роки тому +1794

    This is ridiculous she did a lot of shady stuff during that time, that caused the general public to dislike her.

    • @zulygirl4412
      @zulygirl4412 2 роки тому +5

      Please name the shady things she's done.

    • @supernova7848
      @supernova7848 2 роки тому +80

      @@zulygirl4412 pooping in the marital bed and blaming it on the dogs. illegally traveling to Australia with the dogs and blaming the lack of paperwork for the dogs on her P.A

    • @bonitaleady8017
      @bonitaleady8017 2 роки тому +26

      ZulyGirl I won’t say she did anything bad because I have no idea. To me, she is just an awful actress. For them to say the movie was successful because of her…she is the reason we didn’t buy the movie, download, etc. Not a personal fan of Nicole Kidman, however she did a great job in the movie. She showed love and empathy. Amber as an actress🤢

    • @painomnom
      @painomnom 2 роки тому +4

      there are temporal links of witnesses being threatened and their depositions made against ambers story.

    • @patricknez7258
      @patricknez7258 2 роки тому

      Kari ikr! Catheryn Arnold embarrassed herself lol smh

  • @johnshipp3050
    @johnshipp3050 2 роки тому +300

    Heards carreer took off after she married Johnny, her negitivity comes from her outrageous behavour and lies...

    • @isabelperez3094
      @isabelperez3094 2 роки тому +11

      Very true. They need to put out what her worth and assets were prior to her even meeting Johnny. And what it was before the attorneys statements. That would be interesting.

    • @wendyhardin5259
      @wendyhardin5259 2 роки тому +5

      Because he was helping her get parts.

    • @joeywheeler8576
      @joeywheeler8576 2 роки тому

      and she ruin it, now ends ups on depp black list lol, im looking forward to see how amber career is like after this trial now

  • @olyajordan
    @olyajordan 2 роки тому +418

    She’s absolutely unqualified. Like everyone else on Heard’s side. Watching her witnesses testify is like watching a road accident happening in real time🤦🏽‍♀️

    • @sandiswamay8578
      @sandiswamay8578 2 роки тому +3

      Word!

    • @PP-ux9bh
      @PP-ux9bh 2 роки тому +6

      train wreck in slow motion

    • @gemstar7286
      @gemstar7286 2 роки тому +7

      It figures JD would get blamed for 'bad publicity' even though people just saw AH for what she really is .. which is a scheming liar .

    • @youkasiia
      @youkasiia 2 роки тому

      It is so clear that Johnny Depp should loose here. Amber didn't make him a heavy drunk and junkie, and he made his layer destroy Amber's reputatiion.

    • @olyajordan
      @olyajordan 2 роки тому +10

      @@youkasiia being a drunk or a junkie doesn't make you an abuser. And to be fair she started demolishing his reputation long before this trial

  • @GV-su9ov
    @GV-su9ov 2 роки тому +439

    This lawyer has very good analytical skills. The witness does not have basis for her opinion.

    • @elknrut
      @elknrut 2 роки тому +1

      Are you kidding me? Trees burn one at a time... bumble bumble....bumble bumble...circle with no meaning or ending, complete waste of time.

    • @bopeters7542
      @bopeters7542 2 роки тому

      You don't need to have good analytical skills to understand the difference between causation and correlation, those are the absolute basics...

  • @DAVING0
    @DAVING0 2 роки тому +184

    She's damaged her own career, simple.

  • @organizersrus
    @organizersrus 2 роки тому +163

    I am in awe that this woman has been hired as an expert to testify when she has absolutely no evidence. Insane! Embarrassing!

    • @annalore5513
      @annalore5513 2 роки тому +4

      I am not!! kinda follows the others

    • @kaywee4200
      @kaywee4200 2 роки тому +6

      Not one of her witnesses made sense to me dawg it's crazy!

    • @grajalesmint
      @grajalesmint 2 роки тому +1

      Another one that will be jobless because of Amber lol

    • @Eric-mp4ft
      @Eric-mp4ft 2 роки тому +2

      That’s their 15 minutes of fame!!!

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 7 місяців тому

      Her answers are redundant Mr Dennison should object to how she rambles on has nothing to do with the questions

  • @anrkyking720
    @anrkyking720 2 роки тому +500

    The fact that she’s asking double what Depp is asking only further shows her aggression and abusive nature.

    • @beautifulmind6697
      @beautifulmind6697 2 роки тому +10

      It really does

    • @mjrhapsody5983
      @mjrhapsody5983 2 роки тому +9

      great point and observation!

    • @amaterasu1016
      @amaterasu1016 2 роки тому +17

      She's a gold-digger.

    • @ljb4541
      @ljb4541 2 роки тому +15

      It only goes to show she thinks she's worth more as an actress

    • @katszabo13
      @katszabo13 2 роки тому +17

      As if her career had that kind of earning potential. Johnny only sued against the money he could prove he lost. She’s suing for something only she thinks she’s worth in her mind. The delusion.

  • @PeacefulAcres
    @PeacefulAcres 2 роки тому +437

    I've never heard of Waldman or his statements until just now, but heard the recordings of Amber arguing with Johnny and stating that she did hit him. So in my case, and I feel like many others, it's her actions and the truth that's wrecking her career.

    • @mirozen_
      @mirozen_ 2 роки тому +9

      Same here.

    • @oldenglishsheepdogfun5960
      @oldenglishsheepdogfun5960 2 роки тому +17

      Me too. I dislike her because of hearing her on the recordings and then not donating money

    • @petrapohl8272
      @petrapohl8272 2 роки тому +2

      Same here!!!

    • @yanto6145
      @yanto6145 2 роки тому +1

      Yup

    • @chach1070
      @chach1070 2 роки тому +8

      Saaaame! Had no idea who this Waldman person is and still don’t lmao 🤣

  • @cassidysoller
    @cassidysoller 2 роки тому +154

    the worst part is, when amber loses, she will blame her lawyers & witnesses. not herself for her own mistakes. it's really sad it almost feels like bc of that, justice will never be truly served.

    • @jpg8760
      @jpg8760 2 роки тому +4

      My thoughts exactly. In her mind she’ll never be responsible for any wrongdoing. Maybe Johnny should’ve slapped some sense into her. Or given it the old college try anyway.

    • @bigheart270
      @bigheart270 2 роки тому +1

      the fact is that you are mistaken to believe she will lose anything...the worst outcome is that she will be offered free therapy for life because she is still a victim and a FEMALE

    • @cassidysoller
      @cassidysoller 2 роки тому +3

      @@bigheart270 unfortunately she did this to herself. she never suffered any PHYSICAL abuse. & she also JUST admitted the op ed was about johnny. so that's about it lol case closed. that's what the trial was about anyway.

    • @cassidysoller
      @cassidysoller 2 роки тому +2

      @@bigheart270 it sucks that a narcissistic psychopath like amber has this much screen time at all :( i hope she DOES get help because she needs it. maybe now she truly will have PTSD.

    • @ZENergy888
      @ZENergy888 2 роки тому

      Always blaming others....what's that sound like?

  • @thesummerland6165
    @thesummerland6165 2 роки тому +286

    love Dennison, he is stealthy..comes across disarming and soft..but he's extremely intelligent and sharp exposing lies

    • @xxlCortez
      @xxlCortez 2 роки тому +19

      And knows which buttons to push.

    • @Jarzula
      @Jarzula 2 роки тому +20

      Yes he does. He was so good, he had the “expert” flirting with him. “Ohhh you’re a movie fan” and she said a few other things as well. Talk about a smooooooth criminal lol

    • @GhostFV2025
      @GhostFV2025 2 роки тому +3

      Well said.

  • @landofjennay
    @landofjennay 2 роки тому +449

    I love how he brought up the poop story because he's right, you can't directly correlate what did or did not destroy her career. Maybe people just started realizing she's a crappy actress.

    • @allenanalla2549
      @allenanalla2549 2 роки тому +26

      A 'Crappy' person lmfao

    • @californiacupcake8580
      @californiacupcake8580 2 роки тому +1

      💩

    • @brown4692
      @brown4692 2 роки тому

      Before the trial I never knew who she was so idk if a crappie actress but a crappie person that she is

    • @raafatawar8005
      @raafatawar8005 2 роки тому

      Time stamp?

    • @landofjennay
      @landofjennay 2 роки тому +13

      @@raafatawar8005 14:57 is when he starts talking about it and the witness laughs.

  • @Stuff_And_Things
    @Stuff_And_Things 2 роки тому +60

    The problem with this witness is that she's projecting Heard's "potential" loss of revenue "IF" her career skyrockets.
    You cannot be certain her career would do so because there is not enough history for her.
    This lady chose success stories as her baseline for what to expect for Heard going forward.
    But there are so many failures she would have been just as wrong to compare Heard to.
    Paul Hogan was so successful as Dundee and then his career tanked.
    On the other side, Depp's team isn't projecting potential losses at all.
    They are calculating losses based on projects Johnny was in line for that are on the table NOW.
    This lady screams bias against Depp.

  • @mitsumeeshi
    @mitsumeeshi 2 роки тому +894

    I love this lawyer, Wayne Dennison! He called this entertainment expert out for not knowing basic things about movies and actors she says she has analyzed, and been paid $60K and hasn't even met Heard. Dennison asked her if she knew who Patrick Wilson was, and she didn't know! If you're going to call yourself an expert and constantly repeat your 25 years of experience in entertainment, you should do your research! Patrick Wilson played a HUGE part in Aquaman! He was the ANTAGONIST, the VILLAIN (if you will) in Aquaman! This witness didn't even know about Heard's other film. 25 years of experience, and she is a so-called Expert Witness in this 2022 defamation case and she doesn't know popular movies or their lead actors! It's Wayne Dennison who brought that out. That's what a good lawyer does!

    • @wadewilson8011
      @wadewilson8011 2 роки тому +19

      Bravo.

    • @stompthedragon4010
      @stompthedragon4010 2 роки тому +50

      It was great when she started getting rattled. Her face tightened, she looked angry, she was avoidibg eye contact, started taking more swigs from her bottle.

    • @mitsumeeshi
      @mitsumeeshi 2 роки тому

      @@wadewilson8011 😊

    • @mitsumeeshi
      @mitsumeeshi 2 роки тому +45

      @@stompthedragon4010 I know, right?! I think that's how the lawyer, Dennison, made it happen. He took so much time, and he made her nervous and defensive. He did the same with the mental health expert (who was horrible). I wonder if that's Dennison's style. If it's a way of making these witnesses see the mistakes and contradictions in their testimonies and knowledge. I honestly think he's better than the other lawyers on the team, if I can compare. I mean, Vasquez is very reactive, I've noticed. She's quick, but could step up her game if she did more research and took the time to learn the lingo that is used and practiced in these witnesses' fields of profession. I mean, Dennison takes his time and is adorably (and perhaps deceptively bumbling in his speech, like Columbo, I'm tellin ya!), but he KNOWS what he's talking about. He surprises the witnesses with his knowledge. It's so entertaining!!!

    • @ludomirsteinbruck9376
      @ludomirsteinbruck9376 2 роки тому +7

      I highly doubt the jury will recognise this though

  • @SahvonEdwards
    @SahvonEdwards 2 роки тому +124

    He’s really good making it seem like he’s not going anywhere, then brings it full circle.

  • @alonewithalones
    @alonewithalones 2 роки тому +56

    The judicial system needs to look at how hired “expert witnesses” is a major flaw in cases. It is hard to remain impartial when you are being paid big dollars by one party.

    • @1grey11
      @1grey11 2 роки тому

      The solution they’ve clearly come up with is to just pay both

    • @MasterIceyy
      @MasterIceyy 2 роки тому +2

      She literally said Causation and Correlation are just semantics, despite them being objectively very, very different things

  • @dianerauma2932
    @dianerauma2932 2 роки тому +756

    Amber caused her own negativity by the recordings of her abusing her husband physically emotionally mentally and verbally she ruined her own career! This is a waste of time! Justice for Johnny❤️

    • @jacklow9611
      @jacklow9611 2 роки тому +15

      You'd think that, but actually it's spreading the word about how narcissistic, manipulative, abusive and crazy she actually is, so it's not a total waste of time.

    • @tehmineyalbuzdag2390
      @tehmineyalbuzdag2390 2 роки тому +19

      Did she have a career though? I didnt even know this terd before all of this.

    • @arcticbadger1
      @arcticbadger1 2 роки тому +1

      I wouldn’t trust AH as far as I could throw her 😆
      Evil witch
      & I certainly wouldn’t trust her around a puppy never mind a baby

    • @arcticbadger1
      @arcticbadger1 2 роки тому +4

      @@tehmineyalbuzdag2390 😂🤣😂 I know right !

    • @dianerauma2932
      @dianerauma2932 2 роки тому +4

      @@jacklow9611 that’s true! I was meaning that her trying to blame Johnny for her losing roles etc was a waste of time cuz we all know it’s not true. Thanks for clarifying though 😊

  • @shannelleilaava
    @shannelleilaava 2 роки тому +133

    I swear all of AH's witnesses were coached to look at the jury when answering.

  • @Memoiana
    @Memoiana 2 роки тому +16

    The most shocking thing I heard in this trial: “A decline in AH’s career”
    AH had a career???

  • @rebeccatreminio735
    @rebeccatreminio735 2 роки тому +179

    The world heard the audio clip of her admitting to hitting him. She ruined her own career.

  • @hundrah5724
    @hundrah5724 2 роки тому +299

    This lawyer was really brillant. Most calm towards the Witness but really confusing her. At the end she was completely Lost!!!

    • @tichaonanhlangano1426
      @tichaonanhlangano1426 2 роки тому +7

      Correct

    • @thecuriousboi
      @thecuriousboi 2 роки тому +25

      and he wasnt even objected once, hes a pro

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому +3

      Not sure that was a strategy. He stumbles alot on his words and is constantly shaking/trembling. He looks like he has a medical condition.

    • @simmypoo
      @simmypoo 2 роки тому +1

      This is the only witness of Turds that I've actually felt bad for, she should have been hired by Johnny. She's actually very good. One of his tactics is to try to interrupt her, she stands her ground and doesn't let him disrespect her. She's trying to do her job.

    • @stompthedragon4010
      @stompthedragon4010 2 роки тому

      Right. You can' t just exclude negative press about tge dog poop just because it is advantageous to Amner' s case, and it didnt come from Waldman

  • @user-lr5ys4nk5w
    @user-lr5ys4nk5w 2 роки тому +20

    The fact that Amber Heard can keep a stoic look when the depp lawyer says Amber Turd is actually impressive.

  • @karimamin2
    @karimamin2 2 роки тому +456

    If social media statements damaged Amber's career then the same can be made about her statements that showed up on social media about Johnny.

    • @wendyhardin5259
      @wendyhardin5259 2 роки тому +5

      But her damage is worse. Right?!

    • @darkestknightishere
      @darkestknightishere 2 роки тому

      @@wendyhardin5259 how come?

    • @beautifulangel5627
      @beautifulangel5627 2 роки тому +15

      Amber is the cause of her own negative effects, and she is the cause of people viewing Johnny in a negative light as well. She IS the match, not the Waldman Report. She and her lies are the match that started to burn the forest if this so-called expert wants to use that analogy.

    • @clevtb6775
      @clevtb6775 2 роки тому +5

      @@wendyhardin5259 yes it is worse because of her evil motives and her lies came back to haunt her... whenever you are digging a hole for someone dig one for yourself because the circumstances can backfire especially if the person is telling lies.

    • @kandycepeterson2482
      @kandycepeterson2482 2 роки тому +3

      Maybe the so called expert can explain the difference between assumptions in predicting losing a million dollars on AQUAMANN and 22 million dollars on pirates of the Caribbean. And how much the next role would bring a real actor, with proven statistics, to better project Johnny Depp's losses directly due to amber herself.

  • @rsr4099
    @rsr4099 2 роки тому +372

    These arrogant, narcissistic people on her team seem evil. She makes her point and smiles, like gotcha, when imo she comes off as a partisan liar.

    • @ojoopeyemi1166
      @ojoopeyemi1166 2 роки тому

      Hm

    • @deborahdicembre9579
      @deborahdicembre9579 2 роки тому +14

      Agree. The vibe of this lady is so off. Not coming across as credible at all . The smarmy smiling gotcha dupers delight is disturbing. Then she snaps back to I’m the expert Queen do not interrupt me. it annoyed me that he let her go on and on but the more she spoke the more she dug a hole. Well done mr Guy / lawyer !

    • @mmartin685
      @mmartin685 2 роки тому +2

      I think this woman is great, she has fact based researched evidence. She's smart, well spoken, and doesn't take crap from the lawyer.

    • @vicki6624
      @vicki6624 2 роки тому +23

      @m martin And doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation. Or she was pretending she didn't so she wouldn't have to answer any truth-revealing questions. Either way, she made herself look very poor as a so-called expert, and further damaged Amber's case -- if it's even possible to damage it more than it already is.

  • @LGseeker
    @LGseeker 2 роки тому +116

    She can quote statistical analysis on tweets but can’t confirm that “correlation does not prove causation”.
    This is like a typical news anchor raving on statistics but doesn’t understand what they’re saying. And she’s an expert? 🤣🤡

  • @cperez1000
    @cperez1000 2 роки тому +156

    "correlation is not causation" - "I'm not an expert in semantics".
    "Oranges and tangerines are not the same" - "I'm not an expert in fruitology"

  • @munchems
    @munchems 2 роки тому +1000

    Bruh, this woman is a wretch. I can’t believe she actually spoke to that lawyer like that and quite literally doesn’t even understand her own job? How does AH’s team continue to put people on the stand that make her look worse and worse?

    • @bonjourputas
      @bonjourputas 2 роки тому +68

      Several of Amber's experts were just downright rude

    • @4n4Queen
      @4n4Queen 2 роки тому +26

      They also get that crack man testified on court for them . 😂

    • @munchems
      @munchems 2 роки тому +3

      @@4n4Queen 🤣

    • @mmartin685
      @mmartin685 2 роки тому +6

      This woman was great, she kept coming back to the point even though he tried to derail her. She had clear, consise, fact based answers.

    • @kozmiclando
      @kozmiclando 2 роки тому +65

      @@mmartin685 She Couldn’t Even Provide A Fact Based Answer Considering Two Simple Words Lol. Stop It

  • @booshmcfadden7638
    @booshmcfadden7638 2 роки тому +16

    This woman has been "working on" this case to the tune of $60,000, and the best answer she can come up with to questions about her findings is "I don't know." Wow.

  • @tuttmasterc
    @tuttmasterc 2 роки тому +148

    At the 13min mark she just admits then that having a negative story about you can damage your career......exactly what Johnny is suing Amber over

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому +12

      AH witnesses seem to help JD the most.

    • @melissamoonchild9216
      @melissamoonchild9216 2 роки тому +4

      Right her claims are so contradictory. She asserts that Johnny's career hasn't been affected by negative press but then goes on and on about how Amber's career has been ruined by bad press. A logical person is able to deduce that its either one or the other, there were be consistency in cause and effect regardless of the individual

  • @Liesmith424
    @Liesmith424 2 роки тому +84

    Didn't expect to hear "Amber turd" actually spoken in the courtroom. That's now immortalized in the court record.

    • @goodlooking6704
      @goodlooking6704 2 роки тому +2

      💪💩

    • @bmyra
      @bmyra 2 роки тому

      It was the high point of my day.

    • @plvtoisaplanet
      @plvtoisaplanet 2 роки тому +4

      I nearly lost it when the lawyer said “Amber turd” and they showed Amber’s face right after. It has to be so embarrassing for her to know that’s going to be on record forever.

    • @bmyra
      @bmyra 2 роки тому

      @@plvtoisaplanet LOL. Live by the Turd, die by the Turd.

  • @karfeelye9942
    @karfeelye9942 2 роки тому +27

    That’s the issue with this country. A lot of people claim themselves as experts but know nothing about their job

    • @mariaorourke5866
      @mariaorourke5866 2 роки тому

      Too true. I read once that in order for evil to prevail it only requires good men/women to remain silent. I probably haven't got it exactly but hope you get the gist

    • @matwatson7947
      @matwatson7947 2 роки тому

      Give her a break...
      Dennison asked her the very tough question of "Correlation itself does not imply Causation does it"....

  • @katbrunelle2290
    @katbrunelle2290 2 роки тому +303

    She says she's not an expert on causation and correlation? Does she not know her job?!

    • @series9193
      @series9193 2 роки тому +20

      And she calls them semantics not a very bright person !!

    • @wendyhardin5259
      @wendyhardin5259 2 роки тому +1

      I’m sure her full time job😉 she might be an expert.

    • @ladygeorge505
      @ladygeorge505 2 роки тому

      She's an absolute fool

    • @Kelly-hh7jz
      @Kelly-hh7jz 2 роки тому +2

      Right. That's literally what she was hired for

    • @sniperfosho
      @sniperfosho 2 роки тому

      Glorified daddy's girl who got her job because of silicon Valley and connections. She's reminds me of a local dollar general clerk, but in better clothes 🤣

  • @jeremiah5511
    @jeremiah5511 2 роки тому +615

    So then by this womans exact logic, and her wording that she agreed to, EVERYTHING after amber posted the first moment of Johnny being abusive and everything else is a direct link to him losing millions of dollars worth of deals, and the halt of his career. Which clearly means that amber is guilty of defamation of character and slander, as well as purgury under oath.

    • @exosproudmamabear558
      @exosproudmamabear558 2 роки тому +43

      That she dissagrees on ,it only works if it is Amber. Apperantly she thinks Johnny is just doing fine and didnt lose anything.

    • @AB-ty7kh
      @AB-ty7kh 2 роки тому +16

      Unfortunately no. The argument isn't that it impacted him negatively, it's whether or not her statements were true. Libel is tricky, the core of it isn't the damage it's the truth of it. (Obviously it's more nuanced though)

    • @jeremiah5511
      @jeremiah5511 2 роки тому +5

      @@AB-ty7kh thanks for the clarification

    • @carlkligerman1981
      @carlkligerman1981 2 роки тому +2

      While I agree there’s some major leaps in your logic. Everything really boils down to he said she said in this case, and unfortunately the jurors aren’t aware of the full scope of evidence we are seeing and which has led to an avalanche of support for Depp on social media. That being said Dennison is an excellent attorney and picks this woman’s testimony to shreds. But as to the foundation of the case that really is going to depend on what the jury is seeing and how they interpret it. Could still go either way.

    • @themedianetwork5141
      @themedianetwork5141 2 роки тому +1

      I agree 💯% …

  • @elinoirsmythe224
    @elinoirsmythe224 2 роки тому +7

    I lost it when he said "Is there a single one who has had any press suggesting that they defecated in the marital bed?" I fricking lost it!

  • @J-Tex-Corporation
    @J-Tex-Corporation 2 роки тому +346

    She is trying to be so smug and he's destroying her in the process. It's awesome. Also, isn't it hearsay if all of her info came from a convo with someone else that they can't prove?

    • @iiAIDANii1
      @iiAIDANii1 2 роки тому +15

      Not for an expert witness actually. Hearsay doesn't have the same rules for expert witnesses as it does for the normal witnesses

    • @bolatito4880
      @bolatito4880 2 роки тому +20

      I watched the whole cross examination, she was definitely having a field day feeling smug and dare I say even sneering at him, he kept his cool though and towards the end if you observe closely she became more serious, because he was going in with those questions..lol

    • @J-Tex-Corporation
      @J-Tex-Corporation 2 роки тому +11

      @@iiAIDANii1 Aaaaaah ok, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification and for doing it with class :) Most people on social media only attack people that ask questions

    • @jaynelly360
      @jaynelly360 2 роки тому +5

      @@J-Tex-Corporation lol ikr, that never made sense to me

    • @bandito241
      @bandito241 2 роки тому +1

      Yes. But he doesn’t care as the lawyer knows he can use that in his favor. They only call objection if it’s on their favor.

  • @patricknez7258
    @patricknez7258 2 роки тому +195

    This lady contradicted herself so much. Her bias and lack of credibility were obvious smh

    • @reginamyers3287
      @reginamyers3287 2 роки тому

      Agree, but the next time there is a fire she should be hired as the expert witness!

    • @ellie.M.mae.
      @ellie.M.mae. 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah and she gave me a headache 🤦‍♀️

    • @glo2043
      @glo2043 2 роки тому +9

      Exactly. She's embarrassing. If I were her, I would have just got up and went home 🤣😂 She awful!

    • @patricknez7258
      @patricknez7258 2 роки тому +1

      Lol ikr!

  • @Sitania
    @Sitania 2 роки тому +29

    Is it just me. Or does anyone else hate it when witnesses direct their answers to the jury, not the person they're talking to?
    It seems so rude. And like they're trying to convince the jury of their lies

  • @pikesvillemom
    @pikesvillemom 2 роки тому +185

    I am starting to think that AH has struggled to find experts willing to testify the way she wanted them to.

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому

      well you got there eventually, pat yourself on the back.

    • @giorgiadeboli6564
      @giorgiadeboli6564 2 роки тому +3

      I agree,no smart person would so all the less professional were left...

    • @TheTetsuHai
      @TheTetsuHai 2 роки тому +6

      Most have seen the writing on the wall and dont want to ruin their careers, these experts seem like they would do anything for a quick buck.

    • @sanouja
      @sanouja 2 роки тому

      Who would want to be associated with her?? The only "experts" that would, are here and they are not the sharpest tools in the drawer...
      Like common! They all need psychiatric help at some point, or a good cure...

    • @pikesvillemom
      @pikesvillemom 2 роки тому

      Did you all see how Depp’s witness, Dr. Curry, eviscerated AH’s psychologist expert testimony?

  • @mazzith
    @mazzith 2 роки тому +257

    If you trash someone publicly and then people find out you’re lying, people who defend themselves it can hardly be defamation.

  • @meowface8423
    @meowface8423 2 роки тому +10

    Wayne Dennison deserves a huge credit as well ✌️ Bravo to this intelligent lawyer.

  • @tonjabrown4055
    @tonjabrown4055 2 роки тому +96

    I love this lawyer.He is hilarious. That witness thinks her answers are on point Check out her rickety smile after she answers the lawyer's questions. Girl please...

    • @alisonburton6019
      @alisonburton6019 2 роки тому +2

      Think I recall JD doing the smile / smirk loads when he was on the stand.

  • @loveheals4155
    @loveheals4155 2 роки тому +573

    The difference is that the Waldman statements were true unlike the statements that AH stated about JD, so she's using her lawyers to twist and gaslight all over this case just like she does with everything else. I'm glad his lawyer pointed out that it's 'not defamation if it's true'.

    • @msjannd4
      @msjannd4 2 роки тому +5

      👏👏👏

    • @Artemis1291
      @Artemis1291 2 роки тому +15

      Say it again for the ppl in the back 👏

    • @kandycepeterson2482
      @kandycepeterson2482 2 роки тому +3

      Like always the stir is all over ambers lies

    • @magicmom32
      @magicmom32 2 роки тому +1

      👍.

    • @shandiheath5728
      @shandiheath5728 2 роки тому +2

      Yessssssssss. I've been saying this from the beginning. She brought it on herself!

  • @jigar1p
    @jigar1p 2 роки тому +6

    “Miss Heard’s career”! After that phrase I could not stop laughing.

  • @Jane-ms9ky
    @Jane-ms9ky 2 роки тому +1266

    This Attorney is excellent. He’ve got the point. I agree with him that even AH claimed to lose $millions income ( very doubt she’s making the level income she claimed as everything else she claimed), also even it’s caused by # social campaign negative towards her, it’s her own auction and doing . Not JD or anything else fault.

    • @Anna_Key
      @Anna_Key 2 роки тому +39

      Exactly! And comparing AH to Zendaya or Gal Gadot!?

    • @ElyssaM9899
      @ElyssaM9899 2 роки тому +32

      Witness: Look I’m not a firefighter I’m not gonna o there with you”
      Lawyer: “I think went there with you.”
      😂 he was so excited to have said that. He was really feeling his joke😄

    • @jacklow9611
      @jacklow9611 2 роки тому +18

      That's typical narcissist behavior. To them, nothing is ever their fault.

    • @cheryltravis8616
      @cheryltravis8616 2 роки тому

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 MILLIONS ???
      💩 isn't anywhere near REAL ACTOR'S who are WANTED in MOVIE'S . I'm a better actress than
      A💩 🥱🙄

    • @hptk
      @hptk 2 роки тому +9

      is called usurpation, AH almost dress like depp, and is usurping his damage to make her as her experience

  • @cynmillar1
    @cynmillar1 2 роки тому +228

    Why doesn’t the same apply to Johnny because of Amber’s allegations? He’s lost a lot more than she did.

    • @sadladd
      @sadladd 2 роки тому +8

      that’s what Johnny is suing her for. essentially AH’s team responding back to him saying “no u im still the victim“

    • @J.A568
      @J.A568 2 роки тому +3

      I was thinking the same thing the whole time she testified!

  • @CeltycSparrow
    @CeltycSparrow 2 роки тому +30

    So by this woman's logic, wouldn't Amber ALSO be guilty of what she is accusing Johnny of, considering Mr. Depp has lost at least TWO roles in the wake of HER defamatory remarks about HIM in her Op-Ed and social media posts? He lost his role in Pirates 6 and in Fantastic Beasts 3, no? And have you considered that it is maybe HER lies and HER bad choices and behaviors that have caused her career to suffer....as in Aquaman 2?

  • @kayefisher363
    @kayefisher363 2 роки тому +280

    I didn’t even know these “Waldman” statements even existed- it was the Sun newspaper’s headlines about the op ed that alerted me to all this- so this is absolute rubbish-I’m not on Twitter-this all started with Amber Heard’s op ed- it’s her fault she only has herself to blame- had she kept this private they wouldn’t be here today

    • @Guitar-Dog
      @Guitar-Dog 2 роки тому +8

      Yeah I only knew about this after the British court case being from scotland it was all over the news...
      Also don't use Twitter so really don't see why hashtags should be spoken about in court

    • @SoulDelSol
      @SoulDelSol 2 роки тому +20

      I still dont know who Waldman is

    • @kjh6903
      @kjh6903 2 роки тому +4

      @@SoulDelSol I don’t either what is this Waldman about

    • @lisahale2026
      @lisahale2026 2 роки тому +4

      @@kjh6903 I believe walden was Johnny's lawyer. We heard from him last week well...kinda of. It was hilarious. It was useless coz of client/lawyer confidentiality so heards lawyers once again not helping themselves.
      I, too hadnt heard of him until the deposition last week.

    • @kjh6903
      @kjh6903 2 роки тому +1

      @@lisahale2026 thank you !!

  • @Viewer13128
    @Viewer13128 2 роки тому +234

    ah, the waldman statement was the spark that caused amber to poop on the bed. these experts are awesome. but seriously, Wayne is so witty against these expert witnesses. i've been most impressed with Wayne so far even though Camille did a savage job against Amber. But Wayne is just dissecting the experts' research and he's also witty, sarcastic, and ironic in dismantling them.

    • @mmd8075
      @mmd8075 2 роки тому +2

      Wayne is awesome, he can break experts. Camille is just ruthless! She's worse than a rottweiller. Haha

    • @tsmc1130
      @tsmc1130 2 роки тому

      Yeah he's the truth.

    • @liamwilkins1332
      @liamwilkins1332 2 роки тому +9

      Yeah he's got a different swag, Camille like Tiger style Wayne's like praying mantis or someshit

    • @louiseevans5752
      @louiseevans5752 2 роки тому +2

      @@liamwilkins1332 FUNNY MADE ME LAFF THANKS...

    • @jay23232
      @jay23232 2 роки тому

      @@liamwilkins1332 👌🏼😅😅😅

  • @WonderLady
    @WonderLady 2 роки тому +5

    This lawyer is amazing. He is charming. Soft spoken.
    I like his body language.

  • @GinaMazzola
    @GinaMazzola 2 роки тому +70

    it was her own voice recording that turned us against her

  • @melluques8475
    @melluques8475 2 роки тому +210

    Love how patient this lawyer is! He’s getting that people nervous. 🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @ginzagal7740
    @ginzagal7740 2 роки тому +26

    This woman is a joke. I can't believe the "experts" AH's legal team has used. She ruined her own career. Period.

    • @jowin2006
      @jowin2006 2 роки тому

      I read period period period 😂

  • @asoro_
    @asoro_ 2 роки тому +101

    This attorney may not be as charismatic as Camille but he's very good at this job

    • @zulygirl4412
      @zulygirl4412 2 роки тому +19

      Charisma doesn't always get the job done.

    • @Somewhereintime22
      @Somewhereintime22 2 роки тому +15

      Oh I think his delivery is a well planned device. He throws them off because they think he’s not in top of his game. Especially entertaining was his playing of the psychiatrist. He allowed that guy to talk on and on in his hostile and obviously biased way to burn Heard’s side’s minutes and let the natural consequences follow…those being his irritating those who had to listen including the jury. The psychiatrist is so arrogant and full of himself he fails to see past himself at all (narcissistic “traits”?) and consider how he’s being perceived by others. His digging in, over verbalizing, and high handedness aren’t winning him any points from any observers.

  • @lps-emily
    @lps-emily 2 роки тому +491

    you know they insincere when they only look at the jury and don't respond directly to the lawyer....tea....

    • @QiviriTFT
      @QiviriTFT 2 роки тому +15

      Actually you need to convince the jury not the opposing lawyer,so its kinda common

    • @sabrinaoviedo6124
      @sabrinaoviedo6124 2 роки тому +8

      They’re actually supposed to look at the jury when answering a question, court protocol or something. But I agree, this is tea and they’re guilty in my opinion 🙊

    • @ozb10
      @ozb10 2 роки тому +15

      @@sabrinaoviedo6124 depp hardly ever even looked at the jury, I doubt there's a rule about that. It's true , it's an act

    • @Andy-df5fj
      @Andy-df5fj 2 роки тому +14

      It comes off as scripted.

    • @OttoByOgraffey
      @OttoByOgraffey 2 роки тому +5

      People need to get a clue. Attorneys always ask the people testifying to look at the jury. The questions are being asked for the jury!

  • @Rotkraft
    @Rotkraft 2 роки тому +620

    She demands to be trusted on her word whatsoever.
    What type of expertise did she provide, but rumors? Her statements are based on personal level projections, not backed by any type of research methodology which would define scope of her comparative narrative.
    She can claim anything, in that way.

    • @Phukugoooglification
      @Phukugoooglification 2 роки тому +12

      Also known as subjective analogy.

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому

      This case has so far been nothing but hype and subjective assertions presented as fact. There is nothing quantitative or objective from AH's side particularly. Haven't seen many JD witnesses.
      All the people I've seen in court are parasites.

    • @dannielleborris6036
      @dannielleborris6036 2 роки тому +22

      Does she not think that screwed herself in her career. You bad mouth someone who is more famous than you, of course his fans will back him and tell producers hire her and we will boycott your movie. How is that Johnny's fault.

    • @TestTest-ve4ih
      @TestTest-ve4ih 2 роки тому +11

      Yeah. I get this strange astrology-vibe from her reasoning. The voodoo on this one is strong.

    • @stunnedmulletblah9714
      @stunnedmulletblah9714 2 роки тому +1

      Yes. I hope the jury see it this way

  • @danielmartinmonge4054
    @danielmartinmonge4054 2 роки тому +978

    I don't get it. So she makes up the very worst lies possible and everyone find them ridiculous and she wants to sue the person she was lying about just because she failed to deliver a credible set of lies even when all society was In the perfect mindset to believe her kind of case?

    • @binab4784
      @binab4784 2 роки тому +11

      He is suing her.

    • @zulygirl4412
      @zulygirl4412 2 роки тому +2

      How do you know all of this? Do you take time out to eat?

    • @guillermoandresdiaz7284
      @guillermoandresdiaz7284 2 роки тому +39

      @@binab4784 and she is countersuing

    • @TheAxeter
      @TheAxeter 2 роки тому

      Yeah and she does all this to cover up her physically abusing Depp, that's the root of this

    • @zhengchi5149
      @zhengchi5149 2 роки тому +3

      Exactly that!

  • @biancakaye2721
    @biancakaye2721 Рік тому +1

    His team was off the charts. None better. Prepared for anything.

  • @literaturistleben
    @literaturistleben 2 роки тому +59

    This lawyer is just marvelous! His attitude when asking reminds me of Jimmy Stewart. Wonderful understatement!

  • @LGR285
    @LGR285 2 роки тому +132

    Let's first say nobody gives a 💩 about that movie Pirates of the Caribbean if Johnny as Captain Jack Sparrow won't be in it 100%
    The movie is mostly him and his character!..... and this is why the movie is on hold for now!!

    • @amhi6067
      @amhi6067 2 роки тому +13

      Yes! Can't be a movie without him

    • @justincastellanos5647
      @justincastellanos5647 2 роки тому +8

      I literally couldn't name another one of the characters in those films. Every American I know knows the name "jack sparrow". Johnny Depp IS POTC

    • @Megara641
      @Megara641 2 роки тому +6

      @@justincastellanos5647 I still remember Calypso lol

    • @LB_Symphony
      @LB_Symphony 2 роки тому +11

      Johnny Depp is the only reason I watched all 5 Pirates of the Caribbean lol

    • @traceyjones2010
      @traceyjones2010 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah this lady full of it he is the main character and to say he would not have been in 6 she's full of it without him there is no 6 it wouldn't even look right to put another in his place but you know some must find things out the hard way now don't they.

  • @gabbbyyyy6113
    @gabbbyyyy6113 2 роки тому +5

    Smiling …. Smiling …. Smiling…. “Amber Turd”…. Gets pissed😂😂😂😂😂 I love it

  • @samantharaygoza1027
    @samantharaygoza1027 2 роки тому +182

    The only person that injured Amber's career is Amber herself. She posted the op-ed before the Aquaman movie, she blackmailed Jhonny before talking to TMZ, she committed perjury in Australia, UK and USA. How does Jhonny come into the picture there??
    Amber is just desperate for attention, money and always getting away with things in her way. Narcissistic AF.

    • @vanyamylove
      @vanyamylove 2 роки тому +2

      Exactly

    • @ritimobox
      @ritimobox 2 роки тому +2

      True

    • @Penny-bt4gc
      @Penny-bt4gc 2 роки тому +4

      It’s about time someone calls her on her actions and attitude. She is a danger to herself and those around her. Obviously her parents did nothing about raising their daughters with morals and respect. Both of them are takers and arrogant and think the world owes them something.

    • @lisamarieashby2523
      @lisamarieashby2523 2 роки тому

      The spelling is Johnny, not Jhonny.

  • @Ab88993
    @Ab88993 2 роки тому +91

    An expert witness who doesn't know the difference between causation and correlation. Ugh.

    • @ssfbob456
      @ssfbob456 2 роки тому +2

      The idea of a expert social media analyst is utter nonsense anyway

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah, that made my face contort a bit. As my parents' generation would say, "Yikes!"

    • @thegreenmanofnorwich
      @thegreenmanofnorwich 2 роки тому

      Yeah I'm confused by the start where she seems to say that she considered anything after the statements and anything caused by the statements to be the same thing.

  • @pumamadeinindia
    @pumamadeinindia 2 роки тому +7

    This attorney is cute! He talks slowly & stammers unlike the other charismatic ones. But he seems knowledgeable and asks valid questions. Even says sorry for interrupting. Using it to raise voice and talk arrogantly dint really help any witness so far!

  • @bethanybouley6679
    @bethanybouley6679 2 роки тому +212

    I never knew Waldman existed in years of following this trial. I even believed Amber at first until i heard the recordings and started educating myself on the facts! If Amber wants to sue someone over her bad reputation she can only sue herself....🤷

    • @filipinacooks3460
      @filipinacooks3460 2 роки тому

      The audio was allegedly leaked by Mr. Waldman ,and now the world can say that Amber was a hoax and a liar..She ruined and damaged herself...

    • @soniia_bianca
      @soniia_bianca 2 роки тому

      Same

    • @chrisallen1934
      @chrisallen1934 2 роки тому

      Me either. If that is all they have to argue with and if that’s why they’re suing DEPP, then they’re dead in the water.

    • @dianac.7613
      @dianac.7613 2 роки тому

      Same

    • @kaywee4200
      @kaywee4200 2 роки тому

      Me too! I didn't know about Waldman and I've been a JD supporter since she first made these accusations!

  • @6431mastermind
    @6431mastermind 2 роки тому +16

    This lawyer is so smart. I am really impressed with this lawyer.

  • @TheCalebMoline
    @TheCalebMoline 2 роки тому +11

    “She was in Aquaman, The Stand, and got contracts for Justice League and other notable films, then her career dried up after the Waldman statements.” Uhh, yeah, did you see the reviews, critiques, and audience responses of those movies? Everyone hated her performances-critics and the general population alike. No one connected to her. Her career dried up because people saw her acting badly and didn’t want to see her anymore. You say there’s a correlation between the Waldman statements and the reduction of contract offers, but neglect the correlation between audiences disliking an actor’s acting and studios not wanting to offer contracts to poorly received actors.

    • @Scheherasad
      @Scheherasad 2 роки тому

      +she denies that bad press did affect Johnny when it comes to work

  • @larse9999
    @larse9999 2 роки тому +89

    Who the hell cares about Waldman? Didn't even know who he was up until recently. AH is getting negative publicity because she has come across as disingenuous and a liar. She isn't that great in Aquaman, and nobody would go see it if Jason Momoa wasn't in it.

    • @sniperfosho
      @sniperfosho 2 роки тому +2

      And she was just some hot blonde in never back down with no substance, and I believe she was in disturbia but it was shia labeoufs movie. She's a glorified supporting actress who was only ever casted for being more attractive than average. She ain't a Tina fey or Kristin wigg, she's the tree who sat in the background of your kids play 🤣 I hate this argument saying she's ruined.. she never ever started 🤣🤣🤣

    • @TheBaumcm
      @TheBaumcm 2 роки тому

      Only reason it’s being brought up is because of her counter suit, which is obviously a dumpster fire situation at this point.

  • @Grinch2222
    @Grinch2222 2 роки тому +265

    Her career was never on the rise. However, She seals her fate when she lied in an article about Johnny Depp and she's continuing to do so with this insane behavior on the stand. Heard has been blaming everybody but herself.

    • @rc5121
      @rc5121 2 роки тому +7

      Did she really ever have a career? I never heard of her until Aquaman

    • @cplmpcocptcl6306
      @cplmpcocptcl6306 2 роки тому +7

      Never heard or seen her til she got involved with Depp. Tho her taking a dump on Depp’s mattress got my attention.

    • @rhcp9009
      @rhcp9009 2 роки тому +2

      If you get a lead role in a Marvel film that definitely qualifies as "on the rise"

    • @sharonwadwell2425
      @sharonwadwell2425 2 роки тому +2

      Amber’s career was on the rise with Mera role. She still has another movie in the contract. Amber destroyed her own career and his with her lies.

    • @judithmoreines4934
      @judithmoreines4934 2 роки тому

      @@rc5121 I

  • @locifer696
    @locifer696 2 роки тому +7

    She said she’s not a fire fighter and won’t go there with him yet she sure knows a lot about how a fire starts and just keeps repeatedly referencing the “fire” as if it’s straight from a script. I just wish he ask her, Ma’am are you a firefighter? Lol🤗😆🚒

  • @chammiebelt816
    @chammiebelt816 2 роки тому +325

    The social media buzz and negative pubisity for AH is because everyone can see straight through her and the lies... Everyone can see her Narcissism, especially people that have been through this kind of evil they display. At some point an empath has had enough and goes into survival mode.I believe this is what Johnny has done. Stand Strong Johnny,we all see the truth . Prayers for healing....

  • @kittycornflakes346
    @kittycornflakes346 2 роки тому +111

    Any “expert” in any discipline that refuses to acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation has zero credibility.

    • @megforrestart2710
      @megforrestart2710 2 роки тому +12

      Yep. “I’m not an expert in semantics” wtf!?

    • @bopeters7542
      @bopeters7542 2 роки тому +1

      Honestly, this is the basics of what you learn in school...

    • @greyngreyer5
      @greyngreyer5 2 роки тому

      Because it may imply causation? Don't be silly

  • @ThatOneJayBean
    @ThatOneJayBean 2 роки тому +4

    Wow her whole demeanor changed as soon as he started questioning her you can visually see her get defensive

  • @leesteal4458
    @leesteal4458 2 роки тому +135

    The lawyer is very disarming. When he starts talking, what comes out of his mouth is so surprising.

  • @mlk08012
    @mlk08012 2 роки тому +106

    Anyone that doesn’t have the mental capacity to understand that correlation and causation are not necessarily codependent shouldn’t be testifying as an expert.

  • @jaidattadethe
    @jaidattadethe 2 роки тому +3

    AH has only precious 8 hrs to testify her innocence and still her attorney continues to bring such witnesses which are of no use.

  • @stumpali
    @stumpali 2 роки тому +38

    Wait - is she allowed to say "excuse me, please!!" to the lawyer questioning her??

    • @socioreclusive973
      @socioreclusive973 2 роки тому +8

      Kinda. She can say it but he can basically make her stop talking by continuing and if she doesn't the judge will make her. But my personal belief, he lets her act that way. He wants Ambers defense to think they are in charge so they get these big egos which helps him in the end.

  • @mountainleopard5370
    @mountainleopard5370 2 роки тому +90

    I wonder how she’s going to feel once she finds out amber only ‘pledged’ to pay her

    • @MissEllaReads
      @MissEllaReads 2 роки тому +2

      Lol

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому

      No, AH has already 'donated' to her.

    • @bleuskye8124
      @bleuskye8124 2 роки тому

      @@yoya4766 She used all the 7 million to pay all her witnesses

    • @tracey6768
      @tracey6768 2 роки тому

      😆

    • @Tinawithy
      @Tinawithy 2 роки тому

      I’m dead 💀😂

  • @limoreperetzwoloshin8860
    @limoreperetzwoloshin8860 2 роки тому +7

    This woman cannot tell that the loss of jobs for heard may have been caused by the discovery of how cruel Amber is. Her starting point is esoteric at best, and he talent is less than minimal

  • @crypticcalamity9971
    @crypticcalamity9971 2 роки тому +160

    The confidence with which these experts give their initial statements and how they shudder when they're being questioned is hilarious!

    • @badcassandra2915
      @badcassandra2915 2 роки тому +8

      they all seem completely unprepared and, quite frankly, not very smart

    • @yuno9141
      @yuno9141 2 роки тому +1

      Dr . Shannon Curry 👊❣

    • @christinal4158
      @christinal4158 2 роки тому

      😂😂😂

  • @Danielle-wy3bn
    @Danielle-wy3bn 2 роки тому +128

    So sad all these experts and professionals in her side are actively ruining their own careers by trying to prove her lies. She's a sinking ship and she's taking them all down with her.

  • @sebastiandalessandro4221
    @sebastiandalessandro4221 2 роки тому +1

    The lawyer was the dark horse in this trial. My favorite one.

  • @micheleplus2cats
    @micheleplus2cats 2 роки тому +58

    Everything that happens to Amber Heard she brought on herself! It's called KARMA!!

  • @nouraali8489
    @nouraali8489 2 роки тому +135

    Wow, it is very ironic that all AH’s witnesses when asked by her lawyers they talks to them when asked by JD’s lawyers they turn to talk to the jury!!!!!

    • @DT-cm4ej
      @DT-cm4ej 2 роки тому +10

      most likely elaine and rottenborn told them to do so

    • @LI-vt2kf
      @LI-vt2kf 2 роки тому +6

      So disrespectful

    • @zulygirl4412
      @zulygirl4412 2 роки тому +1

      You are a genius. VERY impressive.

    • @Rain-oq7vh
      @Rain-oq7vh 2 роки тому +4

      @@LI-vt2kf I agree , I'd be so pissed as a juror

    • @Jezebel066
      @Jezebel066 2 роки тому +4

      They were coached to do this

  • @jimichan7649
    @jimichan7649 2 роки тому +3

    She mentions correlation at about 1:21, but when Johnny's lawyer reminds her that "correlation does not imply causation" she replies, "I'm not an expert in semantics."
    Then, at around 3:05 she wants to rely on "statistical … analysis." The statement "Correlation does not imply causation." should be familiar to any high school student who's ever been taught any elementary statistics.
    And she calls herself an expert.

  • @187onasimp
    @187onasimp 2 роки тому +284

    She's a professional Expert Witness... like that's literally a service that she sells on her website and how she makes her money. That says all you need to know about Ambers Team. No one actually in the business is willing to step forward for her.

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 2 роки тому +23

      All her 'experts' have been the same. Will say what they want to hear, for a FEE.

    • @dannielleborris6036
      @dannielleborris6036 2 роки тому +8

      Wonder if Barkin career will have a down turn now that she testified against Johnny. Also wonder if she will try to sue him too. Freaking nuts

    • @harriscl100
      @harriscl100 2 роки тому

      You mean her "Expert Witnesses" are prostitutes. Selling their services for money.

    • @elizabethdumas4147
      @elizabethdumas4147 2 роки тому +17

      When I was on a jury, it did not impress me when the witness looked at me. It made me think they were trying too hard.

    • @aktharchowdhury9839
      @aktharchowdhury9839 2 роки тому +5

      She's also an agent with zero clients

  • @anthony8977
    @anthony8977 2 роки тому +106

    It gives me chills at the moment I realized Amber really thinks she is a victim. She genuinely keep looking for excuses and reasons why her career was failing or any bad things happened to her. She did that because she literally think she done nothing wrong. Goosebumps

    • @michaelevans580
      @michaelevans580 2 роки тому +4

      The only thing Amber's a victim of is her own stupidity and lies.

  • @chandeleerjet5637
    @chandeleerjet5637 2 роки тому +3

    16:18 was the nail in the coffin and he reeled her in perfectly with that snare. He said “you can't do it?” she said “no.” then he said “then you can do it with Waldman can you?” completely discredited her as an “expert” she said herself she can't do it.

  • @wilheminanehumba
    @wilheminanehumba 2 роки тому +35

    All AH's witnesses have a short fuse 🤣🤣🤣easily irritated by the questions

  • @goldengirl5165
    @goldengirl5165 2 роки тому +20

    If Amber Heard had a problem with Adam Waldman statement then she should be suing Adam Waldman not Johnny Depp.

    • @TheBaumcm
      @TheBaumcm 2 роки тому +1

      Only reason she can is because he was Johnny’s counsel at the time and could be seen as a spokesperson. It’s flimsy at best and the only way they would’ve gotten anything out of him is if he admitted that he told Waldman to put out those statements by proxy.