How Did Animals Replenish the Earth after Noah's Flood? - Dr. Kurt Wise, Devotional Biology

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 654

  • @danr.9522
    @danr.9522 2 роки тому +50

    When you study the scripture and know about biology, geography, ect. It's easy to see the truth of it. You guys are doing a great job. Don't stop.

    • @FaithMatini
      @FaithMatini 2 роки тому

      So true! Atheists say that the Bible doesn’t provide evidence and isn’t science based but they’ve made up assumptions based on their belief in evolution and that is the only concept taught.
      What if we devoted the same energy to the Bible and what it says? But they don’t want that!

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      LOL

    • @slackerman9758
      @slackerman9758 2 роки тому +7

      If you start with a conclusion and disregard all observations that contradict it, then I suppose you have your own alternate ‘truth’. Just keep this out of our schools, please.

    • @FaithMatini
      @FaithMatini 2 роки тому +6

      @@slackerman9758 with that reasoning, then we should dismiss the theory of evolution because all observations contradict it.

    • @slackerman9758
      @slackerman9758 2 роки тому +1

      @@FaithMatini Don't agree that all observations contradict genetics (evolution), but your channel looks interesting! I hope you don't mind while I can disagree with you, I can still enjoy your content 🙂

  • @YophiSmith
    @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +24

    Dr. Wise is my favorite presenter on such information. His way of teaching shows a passion and belief in what he’s doing. I hope to one day speak with him!

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      Me too, I want to tell him to stop with this unscientific garbage.

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +6

      @@ozowen Dr. Wise has a PH.D in paleontology from Harvard University and over 17 years of teaching biology at the college level. 😂 You are a commenter on UA-cam. Forgive me for not trusting you over him.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      @@YophiSmith
      Wise is ignoring his training. He is ignoring every other PhD professor on Earth.
      As are you.

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +5

      @@ozowen Dr. Wise has a PH.D in paleontology from Harvard University and over 17 years of teaching biology at the college level… …You are a commenter…on UA-cam.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      @@YophiSmith
      Again? Your argument is an argument from authority. It applies somewhat when noting his expertise over mine. However, he is running against all the other experts in his field and indeed related fields. You can easily follow up on this. It is of interest to me that you are choosing to ignore this fact.
      You are sitting in front of a machine that gives you access to these facts.

  • @WadeWeigle
    @WadeWeigle 2 роки тому +10

    That is one rough rebirth. But the world needed it.
    Thank you for sharing this.

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 10 місяців тому

      And another coming!

  • @shimmyhinnah
    @shimmyhinnah 2 роки тому +58

    It would be terrible, frightening, awe-inspiring and educational to see a cgi generated mini documentary on what you just described. Very good presentation. I loved it.

    • @masada2828
      @masada2828 2 роки тому +6

      There is one! Do a keyword search ‘Walt brown hydroplate flood theory’.

    • @moonshoes11
      @moonshoes11 2 роки тому +3

      Fiction is fiction.

    • @friendlyfire7509
      @friendlyfire7509 2 роки тому +1

      Opinions are opinions. Pax Christi.

    • @moonshoes11
      @moonshoes11 2 роки тому +2

      Delusions are delusions.
      Facts are facts.

    • @davoforrest5
      @davoforrest5 2 роки тому +1

      Great idea, maybe it will be done

  • @marktaylor4496
    @marktaylor4496 Рік тому +7

    Dr. Kurt Wise is my favorite lecturer! His knowledge and enthusiasm combined with his humor make it so fun!

  • @MissKris101
    @MissKris101 Рік тому +2

    Geology is not my profession, but it is my passion and I so enjoy this series. I’m becoming a stronger Christian because of it.😊

  • @pamelagreen3252
    @pamelagreen3252 2 роки тому +28

    THIS IS SO FASINATING! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR EXPLAINING EVERYTHING. YOU ARE AN AMAZING TEACHER

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +3

      AND SO WRONG

    • @carson_lobb
      @carson_lobb 2 роки тому +2

      @@ozowen If you don't believe I can ask Noah when I get to heaven

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      @@carson_lobb
      Belief, in the face of counter evidence is delusion.

    • @michalp79
      @michalp79 2 роки тому +2

      THIS IS SO FANTASY

    • @michalp79
      @michalp79 2 роки тому +1

      @@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 the whole story is a fantasy not facts

  • @susanfromthemountains1754
    @susanfromthemountains1754 2 роки тому +7

    This is the best study on how the flood happened across the world, that I've ever heard in my life. Thank you very much. It is a blessing to listen to this.

  • @freedomfields5569
    @freedomfields5569 2 роки тому +14

    I love listening to dr. Wise. His way of explains things in a good story with such enthusiasm reminds me of how my dad explained things to me. It’s comforting and informative.

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +2

      He’s really great.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@YophiSmith
      It's a shame his content is bogus.

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen Still desperate for attention owen? I told you several weeks ago that I wouldn’t argue with a person like you. Then you reply to a comment from over a month ago to bait me? owen…this doesn’t do you or your arguments any favors. Let it go man.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@YophiSmith
      LOL. Your inclination to talk or otherwise is irrelevant. I responded to your comment. Didn't even notice it was you.
      Self centred much!

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen you tagged my name in the comment Owen. Perhaps you should pay attention to your own comments prior to stating what you state.

  • @kla8257
    @kla8257 2 роки тому +4

    Thank Dr Wise for your lecture series, a shame this is not in schools. God Bless you for the work you do to help establish God's Words.

    • @PoppinPsinceAD33
      @PoppinPsinceAD33 Рік тому

      I’d say the only reason evolution got a grip hold was - the fixity of species being false- and the separation of church and state, evolution viewed as a secular non religious.

  • @TheMichealFHansen
    @TheMichealFHansen 11 місяців тому +2

    Here in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, I often stand atop a hill or while climbing, I’ll say, “This was once a very dangerous place to be!”

  • @spottedhorse7
    @spottedhorse7 2 роки тому +12

    Good morning from Los Angeles! This is such an important topic, thank you

    • @spottedhorse7
      @spottedhorse7 2 роки тому

      @@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 you gotta be a little humble. Come on man Hell is yawning open wide to gulp down people who are proud and wise in their own eyes

    • @spottedhorse7
      @spottedhorse7 2 роки тому

      @@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 my Grandad is was from Lunden, an atheist his whole life. But at the end of it I told him grandpa you made it through a war two who you are with dementia. The wages of sin is death. It’s time for you to believe in the Savior and inherit eternal life

    • @spottedhorse7
      @spottedhorse7 2 роки тому

      @@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 saved from what? Hell as in a big sex party, it’s being alone for all eternity and agony. Alternately experiencing rage and despair, hatred for the one who put you there, The one who you will want to lash out with with all your being but the only thing left of him will be you. Because you are made in his image. You can’t imagine the agony of that

    • @spottedhorse7
      @spottedhorse7 2 роки тому

      @@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Did stead I love you, I don’t care what you’ve done, Jesus can save you. He is the only one I can see you, the thought of you going to hell forever horrifies me

  • @leechjim8023
    @leechjim8023 9 місяців тому +2

    You are the first one I have heard of to propose the effects of the flood curse to extend solar system wide! I have strongly suspected this of late!!!👍👍👍

  • @rubywsw4731
    @rubywsw4731 2 роки тому +5

    I love this series. It answers a lot of questions. Thank you so much.

  • @frankservant5754
    @frankservant5754 2 роки тому +6

    Psalm 96:4 "For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised; He is to be feared above all ..."

  • @lloydmunga4961
    @lloydmunga4961 Рік тому +2

    This explanation makes more sense than the current scientific party line .
    Praise and glory to God

  • @trishplanck9776
    @trishplanck9776 2 роки тому +13

    I can’t imagine what Noah and his family would have been feeling while all this was going on, it had to have been terrifying.😳 Can you picture what was happening to the ark during all of that? Good thing Noah made it according to instructions.👍

    • @lorainabogado
      @lorainabogado 2 роки тому +2

      Oh gosh

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +4

      I wonder their faces when they got off! 😂

    • @lorainabogado
      @lorainabogado 2 роки тому +3

      @@YophiSmith imagine is all we can do with fiction

    • @YophiSmith
      @YophiSmith 2 роки тому +7

      @@lorainabogado You've got the wrong kind of Christian. If you want to seek attention in the UA-cam comment section, you'll need one of the more insecure "Gotta defend God at any cost" type Christians.

    • @lorainabogado
      @lorainabogado 2 роки тому +2

      @@YophiSmith darn

  • @stephenbell-booth2648
    @stephenbell-booth2648 2 роки тому +15

    One of the most important history lessons in a while. I am trying to imagine the enormity of catastrophic change that occurred in such a short period of time that uprooted everything geologically and as Dr Wise says, with ripples across the universe. This narrative represents the opposite of everything we learn in a western schooling environment. Pity.

    • @friendlyfire7509
      @friendlyfire7509 2 роки тому +2

      We are called a "peculiar people" perpetuating The Good News

    • @michealhunter7924
      @michealhunter7924 2 роки тому +1

      @@friendlyfire7509 nut case christian

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +1

      The reason it is so different from the science based narrative is that this is not science based, not evidence based.
      Cherry picking and deliberate misinterpretation of facts is what?
      Not science.
      That is howeve4r what this is.

    • @gtolose
      @gtolose 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen Honestly, u talk about science as if it was God - Science - there are 2 types - or maybe 3.
      applied - which give us TV's mobiles and cars... and it all works and we are all witness to the repeatability of the scientific experiment of starting our cars - no problem.
      theoretical - evolution bigbang multiverse earth history etc, not provable and often allows people to do what they want when they want without any sense of right wrong etc.
      The middle area is biology and climate where we are being told that the science isn't the science, men are girls, girls are men etc same with global warming where the power of science is utilised to support total state control of everything and massive taxation (slavery) for the fight against global warming or freezing or climate change or whatever.
      Science needs to be subject to very basic checks.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      @@gtolose
      So, science fails to comply with your preconceptions and you think it should change.
      And you can't see the problem with that?

  • @GhostRyder2008
    @GhostRyder2008 2 роки тому +9

    I would LOVE to have a set of text books that discussion these things. Please, make texts books!

  • @Liane-kz2wr
    @Liane-kz2wr 19 днів тому

    Scriptures are precious. And step by step technology and science confirm them ❤

  • @dawnbird4058
    @dawnbird4058 2 роки тому +4

    Very fascinating....very informative....explains so much.👌

  • @peerdeheer
    @peerdeheer 2 роки тому +6

    God showed me this morning a beautiful treassure:
    When calculating the total amount of minutes of sunlight with Google.
    On 15th of april/Nisan in Jerusalem
    sunrise 06:11 AM
    Sunset 07:08 PM
    Total
    12h 57m of sunlight
    Is
    777 minutes.

  • @stephenlmanter5374
    @stephenlmanter5374 2 роки тому +2

    Excellent presentation, waiting & watching for that blessed hope.

  • @remylebeau7258
    @remylebeau7258 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks Doc! I love having an arsenal when I do battle.

  • @arnoldzyphill3167
    @arnoldzyphill3167 2 роки тому +2

    these talks are very fascinating.

  • @jamesstewart4677
    @jamesstewart4677 2 роки тому +2

    This presentation is very cogently presented.

  • @hamiltonsteeleisgaz
    @hamiltonsteeleisgaz 2 роки тому

    I miss Kurt Wise lectures. Not seen any new ones for a while

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 2 роки тому

    Thanks for your ministry guys 🙂👍

  • @johnwjones3026
    @johnwjones3026 2 роки тому +3

    well done....thank you

  • @appaloosa42
    @appaloosa42 4 місяці тому

    Once upon a time a department head in a local university tole me I ‘should write’. I’ve wanted to teach history to lids. Now I know what I can write about!

  • @hglundahl
    @hglundahl 2 роки тому

    9:52 _"it's going to dry slowly with time"_
    And folding high mountain ranges far higher than those hills before the Flood is going to make water run off, in rivers and local floodings.

    • @hglundahl
      @hglundahl 2 роки тому

      10:03 and the earthquakes decrease less quickly in areas where mountains fold than elsewhere.
      In the Himalayas, there is a culture associated with homo erectus, which I take to be pre-Flood. Next archaeological culture has a carbon date which I take to be post-Babel (skipping the first 400 years after the Flood).

  • @robertdean1579
    @robertdean1579 2 роки тому +3

    Fascinating! Thank you!

  • @thomascagle8904
    @thomascagle8904 2 роки тому +3

    Well explained for the short amount time. For those of us who take notes it wasn't to much of a distraction to stop and back up. LOL
    Thanks again professor.

  • @appaloosa42
    @appaloosa42 Рік тому +1

    IGH has addressed ALL the perceived inconsistencies of ‘evolution’ , geology and ‘ancient history’.

  • @carminefragione4710
    @carminefragione4710 2 роки тому +2

    Migratory birds have a nature to capture pups and carry them away for thousands of miles , without the pups perishing, since birds store living prey for the day their hatching of their eggs populate their nests. So the phrase "On the Wings of Eagles" shows a natural method of quickly distributing animals when they are pups and delivered to nests , as far away as Australia, some of the captives will survive and escape the bird nests and so their generations will continue on foreign lands. It is like AIR MAIL , SPECIAL DELIVERY.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      What a load of garbage.
      Why not just make nonsense up and pretend it is a viable argument? Oh, you did.

    • @carminefragione4710
      @carminefragione4710 2 роки тому +1

      @@ozowen what did you do with the money your parents gave you for an education ? Did you snort it up your nose ?

  • @hglundahl
    @hglundahl 2 роки тому

    9:21 My calculation is : 2032 couples.
    That and a medium size like sheep and a medium food intake like seven kg per sheep would fit the load-weight of the Ark, considering the cubit to be 18 inches and the Ark's "walls" (and "floors and roofs") to be one cubit thick at a density of rose tree, which is the most dense wood there is today, which is an empty weight we need to get off of the _loaded_ weight (weight of the "ship" as loaded) to get the load-weight (weight of the load that is loaded onto the ship).

  • @geoffrey1967
    @geoffrey1967 2 роки тому +2

    I have to disagree with 1 thing, the flood was only concerned with Earth, not the Universe or even just the solar system. Man was only given regency over the Earth, that's it.

    • @lepterfirefall
      @lepterfirefall 2 роки тому

      Totally agree...why would a earth incident devastate mars or Venus.
      Unless the veliskoski (not sure of the spelling) was right in the wondering planet theory being a possible reason for the start of the flood events, I cannot see why the rest of the planets would be involved for the flood.

  • @StevenKPeal
    @StevenKPeal 2 роки тому +1

    What plant life would have survived and what would be food for humans as well as animals

  • @blessedhighlyfavored701
    @blessedhighlyfavored701 2 роки тому +3

    this is what needs to be taught in schools.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому +2

      That would be utterly wrong. In fact immoral.
      This is about as scientific as phrenology.

    • @joelm7547
      @joelm7547 2 роки тому +2

      It’s not taught because there is no evidence. The same way they don’t teach the Hindu creation in school because it doesn’t have evidence it’s a belief not fact.

  • @deepwaters2334
    @deepwaters2334 Рік тому

    Always awesome to hear the truth!

  • @TraceyWaddell-p6n
    @TraceyWaddell-p6n Рік тому

    Thank you and God bless you for all of your wonderful teachings proving the Bible as our true history! I watch your videos with my 13 year old son. He asked a question last night that I have also wondered about and that is, “How were all of the sea creatures and marine life that we see today preserved during the flood?”
    Do you have a theory about this? Does the Bible offer any explanation or clues? I told my son that I believe God would have preserved 2 of each kind of marine animals just as he did with the land animals. We would love to know your opinion. Thank you!

  • @claudette4113
    @claudette4113 Рік тому

    Wonderful. Thank you and bless you

  • @brianphillips5576
    @brianphillips5576 2 роки тому +2

    I'm seeing some... a lot of new speculations. The upheavals and land movement I have heard of but the 20 percent temperature increase in the oceans would cause a large death rate in sea animals. Then there's your theory of Jupiter and Mars feeling the universe judgment that makes me recall The long day of Joshua book research. Where mars and earth had a harmonic resonance orbits. And one of those close fly bys caused the earth and mars to exchange electrical discharges leaving a rip across mars.

    • @gtolose
      @gtolose 2 роки тому

      Velikovsky

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 4 місяці тому

      Exchange not charge but momentum. Chuck Missler has a lecture on Mars.

  • @BillyMicus
    @BillyMicus 10 днів тому

    There is a tree in the White mountains in Eastern California named Mathuzala, it is a Bristol cone pine tree and by counting its annular rings from a core sample taken from it, it was determined to be no less than 4,854 years old, meaning that this tree was over 200 years old when the Genisus flood supposedly occured.

  • @guylelanglois6642
    @guylelanglois6642 3 місяці тому

    Well done. Thank you

  • @hglundahl
    @hglundahl 2 роки тому

    4:59 _"burying the land ecosystems, one at a time"_
    In fact, we don't see land ecosystems piled on top of each other in the "geologic record".
    We do see marine ecosystems piled on top of each other, like GC, like several or more probably even all drill holes, but not land ecosystems.

  • @shimmyhinnah
    @shimmyhinnah 2 роки тому

    Hello Dr. Wise! Looking forward for the next installment! I was wondering if you could have a segment on the two “Blobs” underneath the Earth’s crust? My theory is that actual land masses were subducted underneath the African plate and the other one I do not theorize on. Thanks! 🙏

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      That is not a theory

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому +1

      Op if you look at the video on in depth explanation of the flood by kurt wise he reveals that the existence of those blobs was predicted decades before they were discovered, by hohn Baumgardner. Creationist science made a prediction that was confirmed by experiment. So cool

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому

      It Dax m was the lre flood ocean plates not the land plates though

  • @martingoodef811
    @martingoodef811 2 роки тому +1

    Great informative video

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      Not much information here

    • @carson_lobb
      @carson_lobb 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen How so?

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@carson_lobb
      As in, misinformation.
      There was no global flood.
      So having a tale about how the animals replenished is fanciful,

    • @carson_lobb
      @carson_lobb 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen prove it

    • @carson_lobb
      @carson_lobb 2 роки тому

      Or try

  • @GizmoFromPizmo
    @GizmoFromPizmo 2 роки тому +1

    Well, the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers survived the Flood so there are some old landmarks that remained.

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 Рік тому

      Names survived, not the rivers

  • @stefanjohansson2395
    @stefanjohansson2395 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you Dr Wise!!!

  • @KenJackson_US
    @KenJackson_US 2 роки тому +4

    Excellent! The only problem I have with this is the timeline. The Greek Septuagint, Samaritan Pentateuch and early copies of Josephus reveal that 650 years has been removed from our modern English translations. The Flood probably happened between 3000 and 3100 BC.

    • @sandman9390
      @sandman9390 2 роки тому +1

      Yes! I have watched videos on that & read about it as well

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому +1

      The seotuagint puts methuselah living through the flood. So its dates are not to be preferred over the masoretiv text

    • @KenJackson_US
      @KenJackson_US Рік тому +1

      @@cosmictreason2242 I'm glad you brought this to my attention. But sadly, some scribes made a transcription error copying "187" as "167" as the age of Methuselah at the birth of his son, as earlier copies attest. When we use the correct age he didn't outlive the flood.

  • @albertoguillenguzman
    @albertoguillenguzman 2 роки тому +2

    If any One wants to know more about pre-flood world read this book "Patriarchs and Prophets" by Helen G white. It is very interesting. What this lady wrote many years ago about these events that scientists are now verifying.

  • @ianbetts4266
    @ianbetts4266 2 роки тому +11

    Makes more sense than Darwin's theory of evolution.

    • @joshriver75
      @joshriver75 2 роки тому +4

      No it doesn't. You just like this nonsense more.

    • @TerraLusa
      @TerraLusa 2 роки тому

      Please tell me how a boom (on the big bang ) could form everything we see today ! We need a lot more faith to believe that, than on the creation.

    • @TerraLusa
      @TerraLusa 2 роки тому +3

      How create everything from nothing .... Sudenly a big bang create inteligent life like ourselves ! Sorry but my grand, grand,grandfather it was not a monkey

    • @TerraLusa
      @TerraLusa 2 роки тому +1

      That is ONLY your perception
      I prefer to believe in God

    • @ianbetts4266
      @ianbetts4266 2 роки тому

      @@TerraLusa I believe in God and the word of God which is the bible. It's not my perception it's Gods word how the world was created, everything else is just made up garbage because they don't want to believe in God the creator of all things.

  • @itmaster3805
    @itmaster3805 2 роки тому +4

    After Continental separation, the gene pools became isolated to some degree.
    Genesis 10:25 and 1 Chronicles 1:19, it was
    . Oceans were still rising from the settling climate and melt.

    • @rlrett1
      @rlrett1 11 днів тому

      @@itmaster3805 the continental separation happened during Peleg's lifetime in Genesis 10:25

  • @constantinesal732
    @constantinesal732 2 роки тому +5

    Good job man! Continue uplifting the LORD and what really happened👍🏼🙏

  • @cadon35
    @cadon35 4 місяці тому

    What’s amazing is how the entire Earth was covered with water yet the ancient Egyptians never seemed to notice. Thousands of feet of the surface of the Earth were removed and replaced, and yet the pyramids remain untouched.

  • @TheSharperSword
    @TheSharperSword 2 роки тому +4

    Noah and his sons being shipbuilders, I suspect that after a few decades they got the bright idea to travel the new world and spread some of the animals around. And I suspect the generations after them continued but corrupted this trend, and they built the great megaliths we see all over the world.

    • @friendlyfire7509
      @friendlyfire7509 2 роки тому

      Very astute. Please continue your research. Pax Christi!

    • @keepthechange2811
      @keepthechange2811 2 роки тому

      Yep. Probably the granite was softer at the time also.

    • @philbow6374
      @philbow6374 2 роки тому +2

      I wouldn’t take that for granite

    • @sandman9390
      @sandman9390 2 роки тому +1

      @@philbow6374 😂🤣

    • @ronwood7029
      @ronwood7029 Рік тому

      Cthey did not build a SHIP they built a rectangular box , no rudder ,no bow , or shape to go thru water ,
      All it had to do was be watertight and float ,so Noah was not a shipbuilder

  • @GizmoFromPizmo
    @GizmoFromPizmo 2 роки тому +1

    God transported the animals to the Ark and so He could just as easily transported them from the Ark too. The Flood was NOT a single miraculous event. There had to have been many associated miracles involved. From a "number of miracles" prospective, it would have been "easier" to simply start all over but God had a point to make and so He went out of His way to make it. God is AWESOME!
    Now that I think about it: What if He did start over again? What if He'd started over many times? We would have ZERO evidence or record of that happening. It reminds me of that old hymn we used to sing, "We'll understand it all by-and-by."

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 10 місяців тому

      It’s a miracle anyone believes this story.

  • @alantasman8273
    @alantasman8273 2 роки тому +1

    The log mat dispersal period is interesting (I am certain that log mats would occur...just look at what happened at Mt. St Helen)...however, would the water be able to drinkable ...ie considering saltiness (perhaps diluted) and where would they get the food necessary to travel for months to traverse thousands of miles between continents? I am more likely to believe that as ice shelfs grew.. as a result of glaciation and an ice age, that ocean levels lowered creating land bridges that made dispersion possible.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      There was no flood.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 2 роки тому +1

      @@ozowen The sedimentary layers laid down across continents as well as coal seams around the world attest to a global flood. But of course you will not believe because thern you would have to come to terms with your own sin life..and the reality that one day you will have to admit to the authority of an Almighty God. Sad.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@alantasman8273
      And these are all in flood order?
      These have the majority of fossils, these sedimentary layers that are all in hydro layering?
      No.
      You choose the bit you like and make all the rest up.
      One day you will realise that most Christians accept evolution.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen Denying the Word...Jesus is the Word who created everything...Read John 1:1.. is not a good retirement plan...good luck with your twisted logic.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@alantasman8273
      Ignoring evidence and pretending your interpretation of the Bible can over rule objectively verifiable evidence is psychotic.

  • @garygraves7353
    @garygraves7353 2 роки тому +2

    Where in the Bible is all of this written about Mars & Venus being part of the judgement?
    If you stick to what is written in the Bible you'll be better off than assuming!

  • @SD-ly1sh
    @SD-ly1sh 2 роки тому +2

    What did the lions eat until the sheep got their numbers up? What did the sheep eat until the grass grew? Not trolling, it's a key question if your going to fend off or change the mind of people.

    • @shimmyhinnah
      @shimmyhinnah 2 роки тому

      They probably had stored enough food for them until grass could grow, and the sheep and other animals duplicate for the carnivores. Maybe salted and dried meats, fish? Interesting.

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому +1

      Carrion, fish and marine animals trapped in shallow pools, plants until dietary specialization made that impossible.
      Grass from seed germinates and is well established in as little as 21-30 days. Many plants and trees would root via vegetative propagation (growth from cuttings) which would be well established in 6-8 weeks.

    • @oldtimerlee8820
      @oldtimerlee8820 2 роки тому +1

      Plants were growing before Noah left the ark, as evidenced by the olive branch. Just as plants were growing on day 3 of creation. Animals to eat them were created on day 5. Next, lions are omnivores. Ever see cats eat grass? Ever check the ingredients in most commercially available cat foods? Plus cats in the wild, eat all sorts of animals. Basically anything they can catch that can walk, crawl, fly or swim. They are not limited only the flesh of sheep. God's premise here is as it was in creation week. Sustenance was created before the creatures who needed it were created.

    • @jeffmason8426
      @jeffmason8426 2 роки тому +1

      Until after the flood everyone, human and animal, ate plants. There were no meat eaters. Genesis 1:29-30. It's not until Genesis 9:3 that God give every animal to us for food. God could have kept the animals as herbivores until there were enough animals around for them to start eating other animals.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому +1

      @@oldtimerlee8820 , When my cat eats grass he throws up.

  • @Elijahtheprophet-ss8ou
    @Elijahtheprophet-ss8ou Місяць тому

    One whitetail doe and buck breed 26 years later there are approximately 30 million whitetail deer and that is the population of whitetail deer in the United States.

  • @jayclarke777
    @jayclarke777 2 роки тому +3

    Good observation. After the flood, the humans of that day must've congregated in Babel.

  • @pjfrog10
    @pjfrog10 2 роки тому +3

    Excellent presentation Sir.

  • @alstar70
    @alstar70 2 роки тому

    The mountains of Uratu may not be referring to todays Ararat. I would think the logical resting place of the ark would be Antartica, which was not cover by ice at that time. The ark probably wasn’t made of wood, the Hebrew can translate to an unknown construction material.

    • @masada2828
      @masada2828 2 роки тому

      Remembering the beginning of civilisation was Mesopotamia.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому

      Antarctica was fully covered by ice 5000 years ago.

    • @alstar70
      @alstar70 2 роки тому

      @@theshadow4737 was it? It has coal deposits, it was totally cover in water as well in the great flood, also it was unlikely to be in its current location until after the flood. Noah likely had very advanced tech, at over 500 years old he would have been a wealth of knowledge, it is likely he had access to flight and mapped the whole earth and choose to settle in the middle of the largest land mass, either Middle East.

    • @alstar70
      @alstar70 2 роки тому

      This tech. was lost with the babel event.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому

      @@alstar70 ask any real ggeologist what the effect would be of events as described here and you will understand that it would be impossible without magic. And if we rely on magic we might as well just stop all science-like explanations as magic can do anything.

  • @richandorf
    @richandorf 2 роки тому

    Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky. How interesting.

  • @majoroz4876
    @majoroz4876 2 роки тому +3

    It is incredible that there are people that actually believe this horseshit.

  • @mrzsaszsaved2851
    @mrzsaszsaved2851 2 роки тому +1

    Magnetic reversal. Maybe CME’s or a super flare/micro nova caused this? That would explain the effects on other planets. It would also explain the number of meteors hitting the planet. Because of the weakening magnetosphere.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому +3

      Do not even try to use real science. Just keep the magic.

    • @friendlyfire7509
      @friendlyfire7509 2 роки тому

      You mad at real science and thought bro? It's ok you keep looking for those fossil progressions while real scientists like him carry the team.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому

      @@friendlyfire7509 which scientists? The ones who follow all science for their PhD and then spout nonsense in other field while waving that they once did real science as excuse?

    • @danielevans3932
      @danielevans3932 Рік тому

      These terms also describe the hand of God. Just in more nerdy technical terms. That's my interpretation to science reasoning. We are just scratching the surface. Of our understanding of God plans for us. We just don't have the capacity to really see God's enormous power over the universe.

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 Рік тому

      Chick Missler iirc relates an eccentricity in Mar’s original orbit that may account for earthly catastrophes… the Flood, or Joshua’s ‘Long Day’

  • @lenkerepasinekozma4047
    @lenkerepasinekozma4047 3 місяці тому

    A Mohorovicsics határ a föld alatt mutatja, hogy hiányzik egy 2,5 km vastagságú vízoszlop, ami az özönvízkor kifolyt a felszínre. Később a földfelszín szükségszerűen kb. 2,5 km-nyit összezuhant. Ez is okozott függőleges irányú mozgást.

  • @tmjcbs
    @tmjcbs Місяць тому +1

    A doctor, no less, telling all this nonsense, incredible...

  • @cheebawobanu
    @cheebawobanu 2 роки тому +1

    Cockroaches and mosquitos. What was Noah thinking?

  • @michaelteel4917
    @michaelteel4917 2 роки тому +1

    👌👍

  • @albertoguillenguzman
    @albertoguillenguzman 2 роки тому

    Dr Wise, thanks for sharing so munch knowledge. i am studying the book patriarchs and prophets by helen g white. I have noticed that many of the things you say about this period, this lady had written since the 18th century. I recommend anyone who is curious to read his first chapters on this topic

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      Well, her nonsense more or less kicked off the creationist movement. It went from the Adventists over to the Southern Baptists.
      None of it has an ounce of fact.

    • @UpthePottingShed
      @UpthePottingShed 2 роки тому +1

      @@ozowen I realise you are driven to comment because you enjoy conflict as a sport but I felt moved to respond. You used the term creationist in terms of describing a modern movement. The whole point of this series is that it explores the Biblical History of Creation that predates literally all of western science. Those of us who through the grace of God are gifted with faith know without needing to understand that the Bible is an enduring record of the truth. Western secular science is far from stable in terms of fact, it's a never ending movement from one so called truth that is further developed and conseqently rewritten to become the new truth of the day. The shifting sands of secular truth and so called Western Wisdom. Meanwhile the truth I have faith in endures and rather than receding as science progresses, it becomes daily more plausible even from a human secular science perspective. The Glory is to God and I will pray that you will receive his grace. God bless you!

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@UpthePottingShed
      The so called instability of modern science is why it works so well. It runs on disproof as new data emerges.
      When geology failed, and failed entirely to show any evidence for the supposed great floid, the model was put aside. It has not been taken up again because no evidence has arisen for it and the evidence against it is conclusive.
      The same happened with the age of the planet. It is certainly billions of years old.
      And life most certainly evolved. Genomes, fossils, morphology and taxonomy all speak to this. Observed speciation speaks to this. Observed beneficial mutations speak to this.

    • @UpthePottingShed
      @UpthePottingShed 2 роки тому

      @@ozowen Fascinating isn't it! What we are debating is the essence of truth. Good science seeks truth, honest science acknowledges it's limitations, bias and levels of probability. Your describing scientific probability in terms of creation, you are quite rightly not proclaiming truth. Your describing a journey that seeks proof. Interestingly confirming faith could be described as an endeavour that relies on establishing truth via a route that eliminates that which is disproved. Personally, the more I live my faith the more contented, peaceful and meaningful my life is. Conversely if I drift away from my faith, my life becomes more tangled, more challenging and and has less meaning. I've observed this over many years of living, a lack of faith has negative consequences and this observation consolidates my faith. I can't prove it to you, there are too many variables at play although I could quote longevity in terms of an observation study. People have been experiencing the faith I describe for centuries and centuries and there is concrete archeological evidence to confirm that. It's impossible for me to prove to you that Genesis is history. The essence of faith is accepting something to be true without observable concrete evidence. You seem to be demonstrating a faith in secular science despite the limitations you describe above. I applaud the Christian scientists in their endeavour but they are subject to the exact same challenges as conventional secular scientists. We learn when we embark on an honest journey aimed at discovering the truth. My journey is towards the narrow gate!

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      @@UpthePottingShed
      My problem with your post is that the things you hopefully consider are able to somehow be recovered to science.
      They won't.
      They are disproven beyond repair.
      You have confused your tradition, exegesis doctrine, your actual exegesis and the way it is managed is somehow truth.
      It is not.

  • @jacktbugx1658
    @jacktbugx1658 17 днів тому

    Good mythological story never existed before

  • @BoycottChinaa
    @BoycottChinaa 2 роки тому +1

    How does this account make sense w layering of fossils, which correspond with different periods of cataclysmic events, millions of years between them... ? And diatomaceous earth is plentiful.. after all

    • @masada2828
      @masada2828 2 роки тому +1

      The fossils aren’t layered, nor are they millions of years old (soft flesh has been found).

  • @fs3579
    @fs3579 Рік тому +1

    I didn't hear the answer to the question. What did the carnivores eat? There were no other animals but 2????

    • @SpaceDad42
      @SpaceDad42 6 місяців тому

      There were no carnivores prior to that. The bible mentions that all animals and humans ate vegetation only until after the flood. Exactly how long after is unknown.

    • @fs3579
      @fs3579 6 місяців тому

      @@SpaceDad42 where in the bible?

  • @vinny.deadmou5d46
    @vinny.deadmou5d46 Рік тому

    Anybody interested should read the complete visions of St Anne Catherine Emmerich.. Her writings on the creation and the flood and all of history up to and including life and death of JESUS is ABSOLUTELY fascinating

  • @JohnKoenig-db8lk
    @JohnKoenig-db8lk 11 днів тому

    Kurt Wise is on record saying that even if all the evidence in the universe supported evolution, he would _still_ reject it because his magic book supersedes all.

  • @michalp79
    @michalp79 2 роки тому +1

    Any evidance?, Please, something

  • @markchandler001
    @markchandler001 Рік тому

    The Pre flood continent was called Eden and not Pangea. Pangea is the Secular term. Please use the correct terminology as to enlighten those who are still learning more about the correct history of the Earth and don’t Kowtow to the terminology of the Evolutionists. Great video!

    • @LindaC613
      @LindaC613 9 місяців тому

      Interesting comment. From what I have read in the Bible, Eden was a garden. After Adam and Eve sinned and were in the East of Eden, Cain went away from the presence of the LORD and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden. There are a few other places mentioned besides Eden. Just curious where you got the info that the whole land was called Eden. I do agree that Pangea is a secular name.

  • @dariusg7044
    @dariusg7044 2 роки тому

    Interesting

  • @apctest8359
    @apctest8359 2 роки тому

    How did atolls get formed in such a short time?

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 2 роки тому +1

    👍

  • @deangoddley2061
    @deangoddley2061 2 роки тому

    Left out the sun transformation when the event was happening, witch would explain even better what really happen. And there's know doubt it will do this again through the sun cycle. The question is when should we start building a nother ark, and what should we bring two of? I suggest two blonds, two red heads, two burnets. Lol

  • @Blues.Fusion
    @Blues.Fusion 2 роки тому

    I got to think alot of carnivorous animals didn't get many meals the first couple of years. The cat couldn't eat the mouse because then there would be no future mice.

  • @diamondlife-gi7hg
    @diamondlife-gi7hg 11 місяців тому

    wouldn't "the fountains of the deep burst forth" affect plate tectonics? So, only 70% of the earth was flooded?

  • @tycho8525
    @tycho8525 2 роки тому +3

    Completely false on so many levels.

  • @CaptainFantastic222
    @CaptainFantastic222 2 роки тому +1

    These videos make me sad. Please let your kids take science classes in school

  • @eliefisher2578
    @eliefisher2578 2 роки тому +8

    Ah this is great! Explains everything.
    You know, except for the complete lack of evidence.

    • @gregfroehlke8238
      @gregfroehlke8238 2 роки тому +6

      um hmmm. You mean the evidence you cannot see through the blindfold? That evidence?

    • @mers3481
      @mers3481 2 роки тому

      I believe in Creation but I agree with you on this point. Telling stories is not science.

    • @lepterfirefall
      @lepterfirefall 2 роки тому +1

      @@mers3481 the evidence is there...it just takes a need to have a fresh look at it without the evolutionary tinted glasses.

  • @CameronKiesser
    @CameronKiesser 2 роки тому +1

    Animals probably ate corpses, piles of vegetation that floated, insects and any growth from when Noah waited for the ground to dry. Plants also probably grew twice as fast, so while the animals may have ate some sprouting plants the rest of the landscape they didn't eat would thicken within 3 weeks. It would take a few years for full predation.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому

      Put your garden under water for a year and see what grows.

    • @CameronKiesser
      @CameronKiesser 2 роки тому

      @@theshadow4737 Please read my comment again.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому

      Probably this, probably that, may have this, may have that. That’s the creationist response to explain the impossible.

    • @CameronKiesser
      @CameronKiesser 2 роки тому

      @@davidgardner863 Why is the reading level so low with you guys?

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому

      @@CameronKiesser , Why is the writing level so low with you guys?

  • @rudolphvanrooyen2655
    @rudolphvanrooyen2655 2 роки тому +2

    Do you realize that the circumstances you explain, means The Ark had to be a very exceptional vessel to withstand everything that you are explaining. 50 meter waves. 200km/h+ winds. Global volcanic activity, making the breathable air contaminated.
    Seems the Ark was way more advanced than just a wooden box....

    • @shimmyhinnah
      @shimmyhinnah 2 роки тому +1

      And God watched over them because in the middle of this horrendous catastrophe it says “And God remembered Noah....”

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому

      Tidal waves are not felt in the open ocean. Ash would have been washed out of the air by constant rainfall in the first 40 days. Man-made structures, including boats, have survived hurricane force winds for all of human history and captains will sometimes put out to sea to ride out a hurricane rather than stay near shore or in a port.
      The S. Korean Navy (Dr. Seon Hong) conducted a study in 1993 and found that no hull shape, of twelve considered, significantly outperformed that of the Ark, which has the same basic ratios as a modern cargo ship and the study confirms that Ark could withstand waves up to 100 ft (30 meters) high without capsizing.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому +2

      @@leroybrown9143 , Cargo ships are powered. The mythical ark wasn’t. It was the worst shape for an unpowered vessel.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah, so advanced they couldn’t even build it with 20th century technology.

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому

      @@davidgardner863 the NAVAL ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERS that conducted the study of TWELVE VESSELS have made the conclusion. Are YOU a naval architect or engineer who conducted and published a study Dave.

  • @roydodds3693
    @roydodds3693 2 роки тому

    With all the evil in the world right now, this laugh a minute tosh has really cheered me up! Truly how anyone can claim to be an adult and believe such a fairytale is beyond me. Not one believer has ever explained how, for instance, eucalyptus only eating koalas ever got back to Australia, nor how any endemic creature such as a dodo could possibly survived outside its island environment. Mind if any of you outside would care to give it crack, I'm all ears. Nadolig Llawen!

  • @Spkr4TRUTH
    @Spkr4TRUTH 2 роки тому

    You tease at the possibility of a solar system or at the very least a inner planet disruption as cause for the flood.
    Do we have enough evidence for you to address this directly in a video?

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 10 місяців тому

      He made up the stuff about the planets.

  • @jameswelsh3433
    @jameswelsh3433 2 роки тому

    When we find a human burial, is there any way to accurately determine how long that individual lived? Because if all people after the flood lived for so long, shouldn’t we find evidence for long lived humans?

    • @shimmyhinnah
      @shimmyhinnah 2 роки тому

      I wonder that at some point in future we may find it? He goes into greater detail about human fossils in another video. Says the possibility ratio would be something like 1 human set of something, maybe a small bone within a 70 mile radius and then reiterated that God DID say that He would wipe the humans from the face of the Earth.” So interesting. The fact we’re here even open to these possibilities says a lot about our open mindedness. That would be nuts if they found pre-flood human fossil though!

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому +5

      @@shimmyhinnah Perhaps start by finding evidence of the Flood.

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. 2 роки тому +1

      James Welsh - Since the Flood was a real event, I'd say we can accept the longevity as also true.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 2 роки тому +1

      @@freemind.. please demonstrate the flood was a real event. No field of science agrees with you.

    • @gtolose
      @gtolose 2 роки тому

      @@theshadow4737 Now cmon, play fair, sedimentation is your proof of intense water activity on earth. Now if the earth consisted of a piece of rock with just 6 inches of soil on it you could then say... what flood, no evidence? But as it is!

  • @davidgardner863
    @davidgardner863 10 місяців тому

    If the oceans became 68 degrees warmer nearly all life in them would have died. Actually the fast moving continents, and asteroid impacts would have created so much heat, the earth would have become a molten ball of plasma hotter than the sun.

  • @ThisGuy291
    @ThisGuy291 2 роки тому +2

    Is there a list of peer-reviewed studies that support the claims made in the video?

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому

      Is there one supporting "primordial ooze." You have the same internet as the rest of the western world, stop being intellectually lazy and go look for yourself.
      Why do all you people thing yourselves clever. You're not.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 2 роки тому +1

      I doubt it.

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому

      @@davidgardner863 have you looked Dave. The fact that you've added nothing but your hurt feelings suggest you're just emotional. It's okay. You're free to continue believimg all you see in nature was "created" by earth mother and father time. No "peer review" of your beliefs is needed, you only need cling to unexplained causes.

    • @ThisGuy291
      @ThisGuy291 2 роки тому +2

      @@leroybrown9143 I looked. I checked each link provided in the video description and it appears to me that none leads directly to a list of references of any kind. I also posted a comment with a question about what appears to be a misstatement of facts, with a link to the data that the video comment seems to misrepresent, politely asking for an explanation. Instead of an explanation, it appears the comment was removed.
      Many of the claims in the video are drastically different from what most scientists would say (and support with research papers). That's why I asked the question. I try to consider arguments from both sides of the issues I am interested in. What I won't do is blindly accept unsupported claims as facts. This video seems to be little more than that. Unsupported claims.

    • @leroybrown9143
      @leroybrown9143 2 роки тому

      @@ThisGuy291 repost the comment here. Dr. Wise had been running this series of videos for at least a year, some of us have posted hundreds of comments. I don't even think he looks at them, I've had youtube not post comments, but I've never seen dr. Wise remove one, no matter how critical or how heated the exchange.
      Repost, and we'll see what's supported and what isn't. Also, he usually does these overviews and then breaks the claims made into individual vids later... usually.

  • @mentalcompassno1
    @mentalcompassno1 2 роки тому

    Wondering if you have looked at the work of Doug Vogt from the Diehold Foundation. Could this have happened 12000 years ago and not 4500?

    • @96cobrakid
      @96cobrakid Рік тому

      Not according to Biblical timelines. You either belive God's word or you don't. 👍

  • @nickolasgaspar9660
    @nickolasgaspar9660 2 роки тому +2

    I'm located in Europe and I have a simple question....is this program for real?

    • @josephscala6707
      @josephscala6707 2 роки тому +3

      Lol, good question. It's really for people who deny science because it doesn't comport with their religious views.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 роки тому

      It's largely a USA thing.
      It does now infect other parts of the English speaking world.
      It's nonsense

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 2 роки тому

      @@josephscala6707 Man this is painful.

  • @kevinmcmaster9872
    @kevinmcmaster9872 2 роки тому

    Sources??

    • @SpaceDad42
      @SpaceDad42 6 місяців тому

      If you don’t believe his teaching, why would you believe another?

  • @SpaceDad42
    @SpaceDad42 6 місяців тому

    This is why it is silly to look for the garden of eden. The whole earth was mixed up like a bowl of mud. The rivers even are not the same now as they were pre flood. The names carried through for tradition I’m sure. Also, I just don’t think the arc exists anymore. In a destroyed world, the first thing that was needed were resources. Wood would have been worth more than gold.