What is the Biblical History of Life on Earth? - Dr. Kurt Wise, Devotional Biology
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
- 𝘋𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘉𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺: 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘖𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘴 is an amazing opportunity to learn high school biology from one of the top creation scientists in the world, paleontologist Kurt Wise. Dr. Wise has designed this unique class to fully integrate a Christian worldview with the biological sciences. The result is a completely new way to approach biology. He has taught this class for over a decade to high school and college students, and is now making it available for the first time in video format. In this segment, Dr. Wise introduces us to the topic of biblical chronology and why it is important to our understanding of the history of life on Earth.
To purchase in-depth video lectures, the printed or PDF textbook and more, visit our website: 👉bit.ly/3iZ5ibw.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Check out the 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘉𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 at the link below for all the knowledge you need to refute evolution and defend Biblical Creation: ☞ bit.ly/3D6P1vQ
- - - - - - - - - - -
To find out how you can support our ministry, click the link here:
isgenesishisto...
- - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Wise earned his BA in geology from the University of Chicago, and his MA and PhD degrees in paleontology from Harvard University. He founded and directed the Center for Origins Research at Bryan College and taught biology there for 17 years. He then led the Center for Theology and Science at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary for 3 years, before founding and directing the Center for Creation Research and teaching biology at Truett McConnell University for the last 7 years. His fieldwork has included research in early Flood rocks in the Death Valley region, late Flood rocks in Wyoming, and post-Flood caves in Tennessee.
For more information on Dr. Kurt Wise, please go to bit.ly/2zUN3U9.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
I thank the Lord for this channel.
I have learned so much through your work.
Just found this channel, we love it
Nice I’ve been following for the last couple of years was really glad when I stumbled upon ALL the videos are full of fresh knowledge
Amazing stuff.
Excellent talk! PTL for revealing His story throughout history!
I love listening to your lectures. Thank you so much for being willing to look at science from a Biblical point of view.
I recently hear from The Door YT that when God created He created everything, including Adam, Eve, animals, rocks, water, animals in an already state of being- Adam wasn't created as a fertilized egg, he was created as a 20/30 year old: fully grown man with wisdom teeth, beard etc. If a doctor had come in 5 minutes after creation and examined Adam, the doctor would say Adam is 20/30 years old, not 5 minutes old. In the same manor the rocks, water, mountains, animal life were all created 'old' not at the beginning of a cycle but mid-way or most of the way through it. This made sense to me.
I fully agree with your hypothesis. Dr. Wise also has other videos going over the age of rocks from the Flood. Actual age is about 4000 years and radiometric puts it in the millions. So it's not just that the earth was created in an aged state, but that the assumed inputs into the radiometric dating are also incorrect.
@@entrepreneurlife649 agreed. Science or the study of the natural world is a constantly evolving concept. Every day in science journals they are changing their minds about everything from concept to age to effects and outcomes. One thing constant about man's understanding of our world is that what is true today, is not true tomorrow as we learn or understand more of what we see.
Whatever you heard is not biblical, its the wisdom of man which means nothing.
Makes sense and do agree, but I wouldn't place it at the same level of God's Word in our belief ladder.
@@JBNetBreaker agreed. I like to have these tid bits in my bag of conversation bites when talking to atheists- if they dwell on evolution and the 6k year old earth.
This is better than Monty Python!!
24:04 24:09 24:28
God bless you Kurt, very powerful talk. London🇬🇧.
Thank you for these fantastic videos they have answered many questions I have about the creation and also have given me more info to use for my children's homeschooling
Your children are doomed to a life of ignorance.
Very thoughtful presentation.
Very well done! Amen!
Peace dudes ✌️ 😎
Michael Rood studied Biblical chronology for 40 years. He found Savior Yeshua was born on the Holy Day of First Day of Sukkot/Feast of Tabernacles, Thursday, September 26, 3 bce on the then Julian calendar.
Thanks Kurt 😊
Beautiful explanation. Circumstantial evidence cannot supersede eyewitness account.
Eye witnesses are not the best evidence.
Circumstantial " evidence" is still evidence. A person's memory can forget, not notice details.
@@johnw5584 This one wasn't forgotten. It was written down.
what of the mastodon of which was found soft tissue? it was found in Montana.
I would love to hear your thoughts on Berry Setterfields discussion about the ZPE and how it explains the time problem of creation.
By time problem, are you referring to distant starlight?
I think it is funny this is the guy that Dawkins makes fun of...but he actually makes Dawkins look rather..well.. silly. Thank you Mr. Wise.
Dawkins also ends his example before the actual conclusion because that wouldn't suit his argument!
yes we are it's in the book of Daniel. Dan 9 to be exact.
I love this kind of info including the simplification of the science for folks like me. 😁 I've never heard twentyfour hundred million used before , why is this used?
Thanks for your talk. I want to point out that the assumption that the creation week ended can’t be true because god rested from his works after he created Eve at the end of day 6. Then god proceeded to rest from his works in day 7. In hebrews Paul told us that the sabbath resting continued in his day (Paul’s day) and there is nothing in the ~2000 years since Paul that suggests the the 7 day of rest has yet ended. So I believe that today we are still living during the 7th day. We are witnessing the 6000 years towards the end of day 7. Adam and Eve where created ~6000 years ago toward the end of day 6. Day 7 still continues.
Maybe it will end after the coming 1000 years of peace. Then Day 8 will start
That’s day 8 of an infinite number of
Multi-thousands of year Days of creation.
So living Forever in paradise in the physical universe looks possible to me.
But great talk, keep them coming
I like this
he won't destroy the earth by flood again. this time it will be by fire.
That's not exactly right that we know very little about when the New Testament books were written. There is only debate in those who are what would be called the liberal camp and in many if not most cases they are not actually Christians and have a bias to minimize or discredit God's word. There's actually a very good evidence about when the New Testament books were written that is within some cases just a couple of years and at most 10 or 20 years. You take almost anything else from antiquity of that era and there's only a handful of documents that it's known exactly when they were, recorded, most of them it is not known.
So since God finished His work on day 6, how would we understand the time right after the flood as far as Noah sending out birds to see if there was dry land and it brought back a tree branch. So this would indicate that God recreated the trees and everything else again since the seeds would not have been able to grow that fast in the time frame that we see today in order for there to be fruitful trees. So I think God recreated the trees like He did back in Genesis 1.
In a roundabout way you have stumbled on yet another flaw in the Noah Flood Myth. Were the myth true then all terrestrial plants, not just trees would have been destroyed. Now given that something as important as recreating plant life is not mentioned in the Bible you (as a theist) can conclude it didn't happen. Given that plants do indeed exist on land, you must logically conclude they were not destroyed by any flood - and further conclude the flood as described did not happen. The whole flood myth is so full of holes it just does not hold water - puns very much intended.
The dove brought back a LEAF, NOT BRANCH!!! ✝️✝️✝️
☝️👁❤
Consider the most simple single cell form of life. It is in fact a very complex creature. Would this type of creature be considered "the origin of life" in the evolution perspective? Dr James Tour could put together a very interesting opinion.
I cant beleave that the whole article did not contain one word about the subject mentioned in the title.wasent it about the origin of life.nothing.and here is one information for those who take everything for granted that they are getting told in this neither scientific nor accurat article. History is in origin the greek word Historia and it means Tales nothing else.the englisch language did not yet exist when Herodot,father of History brought this word up while describing late events.A ph D should know that.
rocks do not decay
Sorry Lord Rusty, but rocks do decay. Many rocks contain radioactive elements that decay over time. Rocks weather, corrode and dissolve, sometimes quickly, others more slowly.
"when your science proves your science... Incorrect 🤣🤣🤣🤣💋
We are in Day 6, the end of the 6th Millennium awaiting the return of the Lord Jesus Christ to take up the crown of David. Does Christendom ask, why Christ is returning? The 7th Day (Day of Rest), or Seventh Millennium is the Kingdom Age on earth, when ‘He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore’ Is 2:4. The 8th Millennium God will dwell amongst us - infinity.
We cannot use the New Testament chronology’s to determine the age of the earth…there are many generations missing and are simply not included in there. 🤷♂️
God just doesn’t say how old it is.
It’s hard to believe He created the earth with the illusion of it being a few billion years old and it’s only 6-10 thousand years old. As of now I’m not convinced of a young earth
Could it be possible that God made rocks with age just like when he did when he made man?
Hello Jon,
Yes, the idea that God created a mature (not old) earth/universe has been brought up by several young-earth geologists. Our friend Dr. Ken Coulson has some excellent videos on this topic on his channel, Creation Unfolding. Click the link here to see one of his videos: ua-cam.com/video/REU9hZ1bBhU/v-deo.html.
@@IsGenesisHistory
It's certainly a great "just so" story to pretend that the Earth is young.
It's not science.
It's an avoidance of evidence and born entirely from a desire to make reality fit a particular belief system derived from a particular exegesis and driven by a bizarre doctrine set.
I like how UA-cam immediately pops up their radioisotope propaganda, the moment it's mentioned in the video... Evidently the green haired people don't know about the difficulties of dating things that are supposedly millions of years old 🤣🤣🤣🤣
jesus christ.
So we might conclude that biblical chronology doesn't offer a whole lot from the birth of Christ forward, but Pre-Christ it is actually more reliable then our so-called "Modern science" dating methods. Interesting.
Why might we conclude this? The chronology in the Bible is made up whilst the multiple dating methods used by many different streams of science (note how the unscientific lump all the different disciplines of scientific study as "science" as if they are homogenous) confirm and compliment each other.
@@roydodds3693 Basalts from Mount St Helens were dated as being over a million years old. Unscientific in a pig's eye. All the so called "scientific" dating methods are not only relative as opposed to absolute, but seriously flawed as well.
@@beestoe993 And your point is?
@@roydodds3693 You talk about "made up, Unscientific" stuff. But the truth is you have zero room to talk. You and your phoney Darwinian heroes, acting like you have a monopoly on science. It's a LIE.
@@beestoe993 I rest my case