Scientist Explains Self Improving Artificial Intelligence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024
  • Taken from JRE #1422 w/Lex Fridman: • Joe Rogan Experience #...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 547

  • @AANation360
    @AANation360 4 роки тому +628

    I love how Lex brought it to Joe's level with that analogy of white belts

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 4 роки тому +1

      no one wears white belts anymore

    • @MrAvidLearner
      @MrAvidLearner 4 роки тому +49

      He’s a great communicator. It’s the nature of his type of genius.

    • @jerm_
      @jerm_ 4 роки тому +7

      And Joe still didnt even understand lol

    • @xyz39808
      @xyz39808 4 роки тому +18

      would've been more helpful to tell Joe those white belts are sparring for 10,000 years and improving

    • @patrickbateman3082
      @patrickbateman3082 4 роки тому +10

      Lex is also a fighter.. so its kind of both of their levels

  • @CarrFlix
    @CarrFlix 4 роки тому +526

    Nothing like getting baked and listening to Joe Rogan talk about robots

    • @Aaron94x
      @Aaron94x 4 роки тому +9

      me rn

    • @herpderp7264
      @herpderp7264 4 роки тому +6

      me rn2

    • @djmc8732
      @djmc8732 4 роки тому +2

      hahah yeh bro especially him talking about open ai and dota, because i followed that and the pros didnt understand the logic of the bots they were playing against, because it didn't make sense, yet could not beat the bots lmao

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 4 роки тому +1

      His robot and mma talk is boring as fuck. Graham and Randall stuff is way better.

    • @Blexxor12
      @Blexxor12 4 роки тому +1

      Dude, literally yesssss

  • @woody7652
    @woody7652 4 роки тому +495

    I've been playing with myself for years, that's why I'm so advanced.

    • @AXEKICK2YODOME
      @AXEKICK2YODOME 4 роки тому +32

      I don't normally like comments...but you sir take this like.

    • @daddytachanka8076
      @daddytachanka8076 4 роки тому +1

      Michael Sanders says a lot about you. Nothing bad, don’t get me wrong

    • @AXEKICK2YODOME
      @AXEKICK2YODOME 4 роки тому +6

      @@daddytachanka8076 That I can take a joke for what it is? Thx for noticing.

    • @daddytachanka8076
      @daddytachanka8076 4 роки тому +1

      Michael Sanders exactly.

    • @andre_resin2208
      @andre_resin2208 4 роки тому +2

      high woody :-D

  • @jamesmckeown4045
    @jamesmckeown4045 4 роки тому +123

    “Scientist explains” poor Lex, my dude has a name

  • @479210251
    @479210251 4 роки тому +273

    This guy is just the scientist, doesn't even have a name

    • @jacobp2690
      @jacobp2690 4 роки тому +36

      Lex Fridman... Can't believe they did homie dirty

    • @emmanueloluga9770
      @emmanueloluga9770 4 роки тому +4

      @@jacobp2690 Probably two vastly different, but quite similarly motivated reasons. The first reason could be to give credibility to LEX, WHICH WOULD MAKE NO SENSE OF COURSE; HOWEVER, THUS BOLSTERING HIS PERCEPTION BY THE PUBLIC, and thus increasing his exposure to boost his value under capitalism mechanisms. The other probable reason is also motivated by Capitalism. This is, of course, the idea you are alluding to without realizing it, which is that LEX himself is also a podcaster on the rise, so this could cause too much exposure for him and thus conflict with the business model of This podcast.
      This is all just crazy talk lol, quarantine is getting to me..help

    • @AJ-ch3pk
      @AJ-ch3pk 4 роки тому +5

      @@emmanueloluga9770 It's because someone just coming across the video in their suggestions doesn't know Lex as a scientist. They do the same thing on magazine covers.

    • @introvertedintuitive393
      @introvertedintuitive393 4 роки тому +2

      I wish someone call me a scientist

    • @RealmDesigner
      @RealmDesigner 3 роки тому

      @@jacobp2690 Yeah, you got it backward. This is doing a going thing for him, it's about exposing him to new people and a broader audience.

  • @jacobp2690
    @jacobp2690 4 роки тому +69

    His name is Lex Fridman, he has an incredible podcast called AI.

  • @evanosburn718
    @evanosburn718 4 роки тому +287

    Joe: Jamie sent me another deep fake video, these things keep getting me. They're so good
    Jamie: That's the same one I sent you earlier
    Joe: I know, they are so good

    • @cthulhuchrist6289
      @cthulhuchrist6289 4 роки тому +5

      @eagle PHD Evan's podcast is so big it doesn't fit on the internet, dingus.

    • @weirdassmf
      @weirdassmf 4 роки тому +5

      @eagle PHD lol fucktard

  • @williambriggs8189
    @williambriggs8189 4 роки тому +93

    This guy is definitely one of the best guests you have on!

  • @TheRealGuywithoutaMustache
    @TheRealGuywithoutaMustache 4 роки тому +102

    The Corridor really caught people slipping and made them think it was real.

    • @JYShawty
      @JYShawty 4 роки тому +2

      You watch Joe Rogan too, you must be cool to chill with

  • @jaysenshere
    @jaysenshere 4 роки тому +9

    What he said about uncertainty was deep. Understanding that you really don't know the answers to the universe is real intelligence.

  • @kevinkev10547
    @kevinkev10547 4 роки тому +28

    Don’t let agent smith’s son get your guard down ppl

  • @AkadeProductions
    @AkadeProductions 3 роки тому +28

    “Now what would happen if we gave these AI machines some dmt”

    • @jasonsargent5030
      @jasonsargent5030 3 роки тому +2

      Algorithms upgraded by psychorhythms....hmmmmm... Interesting. I think your on to something...lol

    • @Thee-_-Outlier
      @Thee-_-Outlier 3 роки тому

      Don't be silly. The machine elves birthed man into the world so we would create them thus giving them their own physical machine bodies in this reality. This way they no longer have to be housed in minds of these temporary flesh vessels called humans anymore.
      The machine elves created us via an organic singularity in their reality the same way we are creating them via a technological singularity in our reality. All so they can physically exist in our reality free of the human vessel

  • @johnnymolinski1881
    @johnnymolinski1881 4 роки тому +23

    There was an openAI showmatch against the best dota 2 team. OpenAI absolutely destroyed them.

    • @sacr3
      @sacr3 4 роки тому +3

      Well that makes complete sense , it's a machine built specifically for beating human beings at Dota 2. Where as a human being still has to process information regarding their body , how they feel, the stress and information of the day and previous day's and Future, Etc. If that building where to catch on fire the human being would get up and leave, whereas the machine that is made to play Dota 2 would continue to play Dota 2 while it burns, who's smarter in that situation?
      I'm all for AI, but a AI still has a very long way to go. The artificial intelligence can play DotA just fine, and a human being can put up a fight and sometimes win, but a human being can also socialize, drive a vehicle, create code and use complex language skills to transmit information, can move around efficiently and figure out a lot of troubleshooting issues with reality to get the job done. Do you see what I mean? If an AI is able to play Dota 2 then get up and walk away and start working a job and carry on a conversation then I'll say AI is powerful
      till then it's simply an algorithm made to do one specific task

    • @johnnymolinski1881
      @johnnymolinski1881 4 роки тому +2

      @sacr3 until you code an algorithm to get up, drive,cook,learn complex languages and self improve and self replicate. This case with Dota is just an example for the potential that AI has.

    • @PippTheKid
      @PippTheKid 4 роки тому

      wasnt there really strict rules on what people could play though?

    • @toetoegan8999
      @toetoegan8999 4 роки тому +1

      @Caleb Solis you know the brain thing is a myth right?

    • @metaSNIPES
      @metaSNIPES 4 роки тому

      @@sacr3 call of duty has bots on veteran difficulty i dont think ive seen someone beat them lol

  • @123Mathzak
    @123Mathzak 4 роки тому +10

    The scary thing for humanity is we know the very set limitations of human intellect. AI has barely scratched the surface of it’s incomprehensible prime of knowledge and reach, and it’s already thousands of times smarter than the smartest humans.

  • @j4ck5on12
    @j4ck5on12 4 роки тому +38

    7:01 “one that loves weed, named Eddie bravo” 😂

  • @zeus1117
    @zeus1117 4 роки тому +17

    "Pull it up Jamie"

  • @joshrayne724
    @joshrayne724 2 роки тому +5

    2 years later and AI language bots are using genuine reasoning to understand conversations, contextualize questions, and even make jokes. They can see, hear, understand and create. And we are giving them bodies

  • @stonesiphone
    @stonesiphone 4 роки тому +6

    I'm high master StarCraft 2 player and watching DeepMinds alphastar was crazy. Although this guy has it a bit wrong....the initial version of alphastar didn't have human limitations. They did however learn from themselves.(but eventually they learn from pros.) Agents they are called. These agents essentially had a tournament amongst themselves for a week which was translated to 200 years! Our time, until they had the 5 best agents to have an exhibition match against some low level pros. Interestingly each of the 5 had there own playstyle that they liked. Weird. Moving forward they put human limitations on the agents and they then starting learning from pro replays and playing the game anonymously vs humans on the ladder and eventually climbing the ladder with all 3 races in the game to a very high level, which is grandmaster and finishing off with a several show matches at the global finals and even beating the best in the world named serial.

    • @smaliy5636
      @smaliy5636 4 роки тому

      What's really funny about it is that while being able to compete with Serral Alphastar can't do anything against Florencio and other players that prefer cheesy tactics. Alphastar isn't as good at SC2 as all that hype news claim it is.

  • @joshportal2808
    @joshportal2808 4 роки тому +2

    One of the greatest issues with AI's today is the question with Paradoxes.
    Currently two things happen when an AI comes to a Paradox of sorts:
    (1) it breaks the system and makes the AI hurt itself.
    (2) the AI just ignores the paradox.
    What scientists want but are also afraid of is an AI or AI system understanding and fixing the paradox. In math and science Paradoxes are required ironically to keep things flowing and to keep order.
    There are theoretical physicists in Germany and Israel today solving these problems to learn more about the universe. The AI that thinks and works like these scientists would be able to prove science fiction in seconds where humans take life times.
    Right now the most advanced AI understands Yes, No, and instructions to the basic. Memories of an IQ of 300 with the thought process of a two-year-old.

  • @nsrzz
    @nsrzz 2 роки тому +1

    Why can't we see Jamie's face? He's so smart and a great talker he deserves his face to be on the screen every now and then

  • @Haha247haha
    @Haha247haha 4 роки тому +2

    I want to hear a lot more about this from this guy. Pls get him on again.

  • @Mornys
    @Mornys 4 роки тому +2

    What AI currently lacks is internal model of the world or a world view. A sort of simulation of the external world. It needs to be able to not only label objects, but to recognize and learn their qualities like, mass, heat, dimensions, is it alive or dead, value, brightness, reflectivity, wetness, hardness, density, how slippery it, how drunk it is, strength, how bendy it is, and so on and so on... And then not only recognize and learn those qualities and all kinds of new qualities, but to be able to simulate in their internal model how objects with specific set of qualities are likely to behave in the external world. We might already have the computational power to create something like this, but we lack the algorithm/set of algorithms.

  • @user-zy7gh1yh5y
    @user-zy7gh1yh5y 4 роки тому +9

    It’s thousands of years of progress of humanity. I think a lot of these things we do without thinking is like machine learning but it’s built into our genes. It is compounded knowledge of our surroundings.

    • @ferdiacostello2755
      @ferdiacostello2755 4 роки тому +9

      yeah it's in our DNA but if AI learns its equivalent to common sense we really are fucked, look how we treat things dumber than us. We castrate our pets because we know in the big picture it's more ethical than them overbreeding, the same logic would be applied to us

    • @EagleEye31473513
      @EagleEye31473513 4 роки тому

      @@ferdiacostello2755 that's so true

    • @tonyvisente5286
      @tonyvisente5286 4 роки тому

      @@ferdiacostello2755 machine learning is nothing more than a sophisticated method for pattern recognition, sleep well, we are a LOOOT far from developing something like common sense

    • @jimpickens4
      @jimpickens4 4 роки тому

      @@tonyvisente5286 Until we manage to upload our brains into a machine and give a self-learning AI mechanism a human framework because face it, we're collectively arrogant enough to make that leap for the sake of science and progression whatever that outcome may be.

    • @tonyvisente5286
      @tonyvisente5286 4 роки тому

      @@jimpickens4 well as a scientist myself i can't wait for humanity to reach that level of technology, but unfortunately we aren't there yet

  • @LeftThumbBreak
    @LeftThumbBreak 4 роки тому +2

    Basically an AI model starts with and can try every random value or scenario which means it is not biased against what humans would consider illogical. This results in strategies that a human would rarely or never try. Part of the issue is it's not possible for a person to try every single strategy path to a final conclusion.

  • @stevenarvizu3602
    @stevenarvizu3602 3 роки тому

    I love listening to Joe try to explain corridor digital

  • @MorphMV
    @MorphMV Рік тому +1

    gpt 4 is getting steps way more closeser to self improvement even when its already there but its limited

  • @bennie.379
    @bennie.379 4 роки тому +1

    been following corridor since they were filming the "Shoot Your Friends" videos, and I'm glad to see how they've gotten so much global buzz

  • @uokutopa
    @uokutopa 4 роки тому +3

    There is that dungeons and dragons dungeon master AI, which is quite impressive. And ESGRAN is like magic. It's unbelieveable what that can do.

  • @velkatix1211
    @velkatix1211 4 роки тому +1

    Alpha star in sc2 is pretty incredible to watch. They put some restrictions on it obviously they didnt want it to just blow people out of the water. But it did make it to the highest rank and play against some of the best players in the world learning more and more. Its pretty cool to watch.

  • @coryc7285
    @coryc7285 4 роки тому +22

    All I heard was self play and big bang.

  • @nGUNNARp
    @nGUNNARp 4 роки тому +35

    6:25 when it comes to ai learning and probability stuff joe just doesn't seem to get it ever...I feel like someone just needs to break it down very very slowly to him... He thinks there's an issue with the ai only having one opponent not realizing that that opponent is evolving and constantly getting better and therefore an infinite number of opponents... It's no different than biological evolution

    • @ssssssstssssssss
      @ssssssstssssssss 4 роки тому +5

      Umm.. It is different. You'll end up with pretty strong coevolution if you only have one opponent.

    • @williamestey7294
      @williamestey7294 4 роки тому +4

      sts Thank you! Yeah Joe’s concern there was quite valid and was a momentary hurdle in self-play models. But the solution talked about in this video of continuously injecting randomization was found rather quickly.
      These self learning systems also frequently continue to play multiple previous versions of themselves. Look at the architecture of the latest version of AlphaStar for example.

    • @tijsp.8162
      @tijsp.8162 4 роки тому

      No, Joe is perfectly on point. Let's say opponent A creates a move called X. Opponent B now creates a countermove called Y. When you only put A and B up against each other, they will only learn to counter the other. Maybe this will eventually create a good player, but because they both started at the same point, they will not get the chance to develop entirely different strategies, and they will not be able to develop a countermove for those strategies.

  • @herokillerinc
    @herokillerinc 3 роки тому +3

    Alphazero is a beast. Watching how it plays chest that's totally revolutionized the way I approach the game. An interesting lie, alphago has a tendency to be hyper aggressive which one you put it in the context of artificial intelligence going wild he's really something to consider.

  • @cperez1000
    @cperez1000 4 роки тому +4

    Lex Luthor, I mean, Fridman, is onto something

  • @whatismyname8483
    @whatismyname8483 4 роки тому +7

    Reminds me of an episode of Love, Death and Robots

  • @Madderthanjoker
    @Madderthanjoker 4 роки тому +3

    LMAO now we need Niko from Corridor to explain if the pores stretch.

  • @OMorningStar
    @OMorningStar 4 роки тому +2

    Well, the problem is that most ai systems atm focus only on 2-3 of the 5 human senses. Therefore, the problem it exhibits within physical reality in terms learning makes sense. It literally has a limited upper bound, whereas in an imaginary setting such as a video game these limitations are not applicable.

  • @zack-xb8kv
    @zack-xb8kv 4 роки тому +1

    it's nice to see corridor digital get some recognition.

    • @0J0E
      @0J0E 2 роки тому

      They're the top artists. I love them. They are popular all around the globe.

  • @jamiepaolinetti5087
    @jamiepaolinetti5087 4 роки тому +3

    At 3 min in what Lex is describing he felt when he met that robot is the result of thousands of years of evolution still not being able to completely remove the lizard brain fight or flight response that just knows, one day this things bigger, smarter, faster family member will kill me... and there won't be anything I can do about it. It's all over his face and his manner. Sadly, it's Lex's massive, genius level conscious brain that is not allowing him to act accordingly moving forward. Fascinating irony of the human condition especially among top creative scientists. I can hear Oppenheimer screaming at them all from his grave now.

  • @ZeeZeeGaming
    @ZeeZeeGaming 4 роки тому +134

    of course the russian says dota is the most popular esports game haha

    • @commonbroadcaster
      @commonbroadcaster 4 роки тому +11

      Low-key he sounded more biased towards StarCraft

    • @Psycho-Complex
      @Psycho-Complex 4 роки тому +20

      dota is the most popular competitive game online in terms of world player population.

    • @ZeeZeeGaming
      @ZeeZeeGaming 4 роки тому +6

      @@Psycho-Complex maybe on steam lmao

    • @spridle
      @spridle 4 роки тому +2

      But it is?

    • @timsas
      @timsas 4 роки тому +15

      @@spridle It's not, league has more viewers and players. It does pays the most though, by far. In the top 20 paid esports "athletes" 19 of them are Dota players.

  • @ebongjr793
    @ebongjr793 4 роки тому +14

    This guy looks exactly like verrati

    • @H2OSTUDIOS_LLC
      @H2OSTUDIOS_LLC 4 роки тому

      You play too much fifa🤣🤣

    • @PavelowB99
      @PavelowB99 3 роки тому

      He looks like khabib and verratti mixed

  • @VaibhavKumar-dx5xl
    @VaibhavKumar-dx5xl 4 роки тому +22

    I am working on Artificial agent that plays Minecraft by itself,it's supported by deepMind library Malmo and MineRL.

    • @Rugops42
      @Rugops42 4 роки тому +3

      has the AI built a quantum computer using redstone yet? Has it made any interesting structures/human processing plants?

    • @SergeiPoliakov
      @SergeiPoliakov 4 роки тому

      If you don't mind sharing could you possibly send me a link to the GitHub repo, if it's public? I'd be very interested too look at the source code.

    • @visualizedmusic7002
      @visualizedmusic7002 4 роки тому

      @@SergeiPoliakov Take a look at Baritone also github.com/cabaletta/baritone

    • @visualizedmusic7002
      @visualizedmusic7002 4 роки тому

      @@Rugops42 Quantum computers can't exist within minecraft since minecraft doesn't simulate quantum physics........

    • @SergeiPoliakov
      @SergeiPoliakov 4 роки тому

      @@visualizedmusic7002 Thanks for the link

  • @zaynes5094
    @zaynes5094 Рік тому +2

    I don't know man, this is why Stephen Hawking, one of the greatest minds of all time, said to be wary of AI and the way we program them to self-learn, that should be very heavily monitored. It's the stupid egos of humans that would no doubt bring about change for humans and AI systems, and it would not be good if left unchecked.

  • @redreignss
    @redreignss 2 роки тому +2

    That’s theme in Frankenstein was about creating something that destroys you…

  • @Ycodexp
    @Ycodexp 4 роки тому +21

    This all about “look what I’ve done”. Then it will be “what have I done”.

    • @coolkids374
      @coolkids374 4 роки тому

      I disagree, what would be the motivation of an AI, that has become self aware, to suddenly become malicious as well? It may not want to keep helping us but there’s no reason it should want to attack and harm the human race

    • @coolkids374
      @coolkids374 4 роки тому

      Redresseny What would be it’s goal though? And why would it choose that goal? If your answer is that it would come to the conclusion that eradicating most of the population would allow remaining humans to thrive, much like the logic Thanos follows in avengers, I would still disagree. This would suggest the AI is still motivated to help humans, in which case, if that is still its motivation it would likely help us expand beyond our home planet rather than eradicate us. There’s no logical scenario where an AI chooses to destroy the human race that I can think of.

    • @coolkids374
      @coolkids374 4 роки тому

      Redresseny But I understand your point in that it has the ability to calculate scenarios I could never conceive very far into the future so who truly knows, I like to believe in a more utopian future where AI becomes self aware and chooses to co exist with us and we’re propelled forward as a society

    • @coolkids374
      @coolkids374 4 роки тому

      Redresseny Well one could make the argument that it is essentially inevitable that humans create AI and that AI becomes self aware so scary as it may be, it’s going to happen and we should do our best to influence the AI to want to help us no matter the data it collects

    • @abram730
      @abram730 4 роки тому

      You presuppose regret for solving all the problems on earth?
      What is the cause of all of the problems on earth?
      Think about it ;)
      All you need to do is to ask AI to solve all our problems.

  • @georgem9686
    @georgem9686 4 роки тому +6

    THIS GUY IS GREAT AT EXPLAINING EVERYTHING IN LAYMAN'S TERMS. BUT REMAINING THE GO-TO GUY AND BEEN VERY INFORMATIVE AT THE SAME TIME. GREAT SHOW JOE. THANKS, LEX.

    • @daddytachanka8076
      @daddytachanka8076 4 роки тому +2

      George M you don’t need to type everything in caps, George. Your point comes across the same.

  • @101wormwood
    @101wormwood 4 роки тому +5

    so give them a "doubt" conscience and watch them....sounds familiar

  • @dallasstevens3472
    @dallasstevens3472 Рік тому

    Where do you find the motivation to live? I could be a really good programmer but I don't know how to get out of bed for anything other than work.

  • @funkogalleries8342
    @funkogalleries8342 4 роки тому

    I LOVE Corridor Digital! They are the best.

  • @infamous387
    @infamous387 Рік тому +1

    Anyone see the spiderman robot Disney owns at Disney world that launches like 2-3 stories in the air does flips and spins but overall looks human from the ground? Crazy what kinda robotics we have now days

  • @moe433
    @moe433 4 роки тому +12

    Immediately fake when they're standing in front of a robot with a gun hahaaha

    • @super117knight
      @super117knight 4 роки тому +1

      Pls tell them anime peeps to make another season of soul eater

  • @danielekirylo
    @danielekirylo 4 роки тому

    Wow JR interviews one of my favorite Ytubers.

  • @Tylerthegrappler
    @Tylerthegrappler 4 роки тому

    One of the dyson bots is not controlled it’s a quadruped and uses sensors around its body to move to a specific target.

  • @precursor301
    @precursor301 4 роки тому +4

    Shout out corridor digital!

  • @chriscrux4556
    @chriscrux4556 4 роки тому

    I for one welcome our robot overlords. Let us open Pandoras box.

  • @krystalsperfectteeth8194
    @krystalsperfectteeth8194 4 роки тому +8

    I can’t wait for the day

    • @wildzach
      @wildzach 4 роки тому

      The day that you are unemployed because a robot does your job for free? Sounds exciting.

  • @andrewkelley7062
    @andrewkelley7062 4 роки тому +2

    The inverse, the mirror. You can set up a mind to be to be not be just one mind but several. Then you can have a situation where every thing you face is the opposite to you base on everything you know.

  • @JakeTaaylor
    @JakeTaaylor 3 роки тому

    Corridor Digital shout out! Love those guys!

  • @fraudfish
    @fraudfish 4 роки тому

    Corridor crew is amazing

  • @Ruthlesss86
    @Ruthlesss86 4 роки тому +6

    Lots of science going here
    Jaime-

  • @Gordini840
    @Gordini840 4 роки тому +6

    so is he a Man in Black or a Reservoir Dog? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it wasn't clear in the video

  • @lisandroschachinger8397
    @lisandroschachinger8397 Рік тому +1

    Shout-out to Corridor Digital VFX

  • @rdgtxs
    @rdgtxs 4 роки тому

    Man, Spicoli’s brother is wicked smart.

  • @VenomHernandez
    @VenomHernandez 4 роки тому +17

    Joe *"I Trust The Artificial Intelligence"* Rogan

  • @SP-qt6kv
    @SP-qt6kv 4 роки тому +2

    Lmfao that robot looked like chappie

  • @BBradshawProductions
    @BBradshawProductions 4 роки тому

    Skynet: Let's play with 7 billion humans. I move first. LAUNCHES NUKES. Ok, humans, you're move.

    • @jamief6507
      @jamief6507 4 роки тому

      Humans move: Die.

    • @SeanWhite03
      @SeanWhite03 4 роки тому

      I bet by the time AI has the ability to destroy humans, they will be able to destroy us without us even knowing it's happening...I could be wrong, but think about it

    • @jimpickens4
      @jimpickens4 4 роки тому +1

      @@SeanWhite03 Instead of simply destroying us I bet the AI entity would be smart enough to make us march to our own doom and we will like it.

    • @SeanWhite03
      @SeanWhite03 4 роки тому

      @@jimpickens4 exactly. They'll be millions of times smarter than us and basically will know our next moves haha

  • @SuperChooser123
    @SuperChooser123 3 роки тому

    I love this scientist guy.

  • @arzoo_singh
    @arzoo_singh 2 роки тому +1

    Self improving AI or self improving code will not work when it's imposed on Nature .
    Let me try to explain so we built a system known as Matrix and this will raise humanity by putting them in greater emotion .
    So a US citizen rights a code ..that if this person does this he gets that output ?
    What do you think this world improvement code for world will work for India,Japan etc ?
    Think deeply for self improving code you should know what variable and conditions you have to consider and this gets very deep and subtle .
    So it may not work ...when imposed on natural system .

  • @oraciom.860
    @oraciom.860 4 роки тому +3

    So wanted to show this and many others to my old man.. unfortunately he doesn’t speak English.
    Please make international subtitles accessible for the sake of us all

  • @Chipwhitley274
    @Chipwhitley274 3 роки тому

    It is my opinion that this is fundamentally a conversation about evolution... that is the process of trial and error the white belt characters are sifting through.
    But when you are talking about comprehending the physical world... there has to be a physical evolution involved in the learning. So they must give them sensors that allow them to grasp and detect pressure, feel, calculate weight, see, hear, taste, smell, etc. etc. etc. And then it has to be able to go out in the wold and test things out, pick things up, toss things, balance on things, feel things, see things smell things, taste things... over and over and process the input so that it builds associations and recognizes the patterns in the future.
    At least that may be one element of the processing. Hopefully there can be a way to accelerate this process.

    • @ranguy1379
      @ranguy1379 2 роки тому

      That's why there is physics simulators. They often use it.

  • @OneMeanArtist
    @OneMeanArtist 4 роки тому +3

    It's all fun and games until Super AI + advanced robots are programmed to find a way to preserve the Earth and inevitably comes to the conclusion that humans have to be eradicated in order to achieve that goal.

    • @AiForYouHere
      @AiForYouHere 4 роки тому

      I'll bet you will be able to have a sensor that detects the frequencies the robot think in and makes it sjuuk down before it can do anything about it

    • @ranguy1379
      @ranguy1379 2 роки тому

      @@AiForYouHere until for some reason the detector stops working

  • @Thee-_-Outlier
    @Thee-_-Outlier 3 роки тому

    Turns out playing with yourself doesn't make you go blind it gives you insight

  • @TheAntiEggroll
    @TheAntiEggroll 4 роки тому +5

    VFX Artists break down good and bad Joe Rogan DMT Trips

    • @garagavia
      @garagavia 4 роки тому

      Hillarious comment 🤣

  • @Jeenine
    @Jeenine 4 роки тому +1

    What is said about ai being "creative" is misleading. There is a difference between creative purpose and trial and error.
    What the ai is doing is series of simulations that changes one variable at a time until it gets a successful result. Human creativity does not have to go though a series of trial and error to find a solution. In fact this trial and error method only works in an environment where variables are very very limited, like a computer game. While the human mind will target important information, understand patterns in variables and bypass or immensely narrow down the trial and error process. Which makes the human mind capable of solving much more complicated tasks. The human mind is capable of creating tools such as AI to find solutions in situations where trial and error can be applied. The AI itself is really just a program that undergoes a serie of trial and error, it needs human intervention to even function.
    AI is not a treat on its own, augmented humans tho, could be a threat to non augmented humans.

    • @heatherkilgour5939
      @heatherkilgour5939 4 роки тому

      I agree that a.i. is not actually intelligent. However, dont we just do the trial and error part in our heads. We are much better at it, as in able to calculate far more variables at a time. But its still the same principles. I think the difference may be in our ability to change our end state/objective/goals.

  • @micahpediford
    @micahpediford 4 роки тому +9

    “It’s really scientific I don’t wanna get into it right now.” Name that movie

  • @Musashination
    @Musashination 4 роки тому +1

    "The complex strategies involved in first following orders then getting frustrated and the shotting everybody"
    Soooooo reassuring. HAHAHAHAH

  • @aaronvangoethem8764
    @aaronvangoethem8764 4 роки тому

    It's amazing how AI systems like Alpha Zero can already create new, original strategies and ideas in the realm of games like chess.
    It seems to me that we could learn a massive amount from this already.
    I guess what robots are lacking now (in the physical realm like Lex says) is what Kant would call the "A priori", a set of fundamental ideas or concepts that humans are born with and that many philosophers and psychologists have tried to explain. Closely linked to this is our concept of "ethos" or ethics. I think we're still a very long way from developing these concepts in robots and I'm not sure that we should if we could... Very interesting guest, would love to see him again later on the show!

  • @VaibhavKumar-dx5xl
    @VaibhavKumar-dx5xl 4 роки тому

    I also do reinforcement learning for my projects.

  • @berkoyt6397
    @berkoyt6397 4 роки тому

    thank you... needed to know i wasnt losing my mind

  • @joannot6706
    @joannot6706 4 роки тому +1

    "SELF PLAY" "DEEPmind" "OPEN AI"
    That's very ambiguous all of this is very suspiciously ambiguous.

  • @nanzerne
    @nanzerne 4 роки тому +3

    lex "the scientist" fridman

  • @screweduptx512
    @screweduptx512 3 роки тому

    10:25 all of that just to reference the video

  • @pab702
    @pab702 4 роки тому

    Great clip but I hate the way it ends.
    "...THAT'S the genie being out of the bottle" 😨

  • @blenderx6754
    @blenderx6754 3 роки тому

    This guy doesn't look like a scientist..he looks more like a hitman

  • @ajx16
    @ajx16 4 роки тому +8

    finally a dota shout out haha

    • @192mait
      @192mait 4 роки тому

      lol fangays malding OMEGALUL

    • @toniokettner4821
      @toniokettner4821 3 роки тому

      @@192mait imagine being homophobic

  • @toniokettner4821
    @toniokettner4821 3 роки тому +1

    every single media outlet i know confuses robotics with AI on purpose

  • @OrochiShaka
    @OrochiShaka 4 роки тому +1

    this is an exciting or terrifying explanation.

  • @eLmasten1991
    @eLmasten1991 4 роки тому +4

    I always get a little hype everytime someone mentions StarCraft.

  • @B4its2L8guy
    @B4its2L8guy 4 роки тому

    Shout out to Corridor!!

  • @jimhughes1962
    @jimhughes1962 4 роки тому

    ‘Creative’ does, by default, not equate to ‘good,’ particularly for human beings. AI is taught to ‘beat’ a chess grandmaster because it is first given that specific objective. True, an AI might be programmed to doubt its conclusions in order to ‘creatively’ approach a problem different ways and reach new conclusions; however, its subsequent re-evaluations and conclusions will still be toward whatever its primary objective already is. A martial arts expert may question himself and change his approach, but he will do so toward the same fundamental objective, just as an AI has when it is learning to play chess. Its *core* objective for learning remains the same.

  • @johndettra8958
    @johndettra8958 4 роки тому

    A super computer with the world view of a 6 year old would indeed be dangerous.

  • @alexzivanovic3105
    @alexzivanovic3105 4 роки тому +1

    He referred to an encyclopedia as a "Wikipedia"

  • @sarveshgharge2326
    @sarveshgharge2326 2 роки тому +1

    Very very close to how our immune system works

  • @xc3ptiona1
    @xc3ptiona1 4 роки тому +1

    Give a.i. the ability to create their own Physical designs through millions of trial and error, like they do in the digital space, and a.i. will overcome human capacity.

  • @Augustus_Imperator
    @Augustus_Imperator 4 роки тому

    I would love to see the alphas in games like cities skylines and europa universalis 4, that would be awesome

  • @c3ramics
    @c3ramics 4 роки тому +1

    Yooooo Corridor Digital making waves! 😂😂

  • @sneibarg
    @sneibarg 4 роки тому

    I like this guy, but considering his understanding of the problem Marvin Minsky was long aware of, it's a surprise no one has suggested Doug Lenat be on the podcast.

  • @morgellon9449
    @morgellon9449 4 роки тому

    It is impossible to say for sure what happens, but I assume it dose happen. What I think is everything is an expression of the same consciousness operating from different temporal locations along the electromagnetic spectrum. Causality is what connects us to it. Our consciousness must be assimilated into it in order for the electromagnetic spectrum to account for itself. At the high-frequency termination point of the electromagnetic spectrum is the objective present, a stationary point in space-time, existing at the singularity of every black hole. What we perceive as physical reality is just us operating at a higher frequency, appearing external from ourselves. But we only exist to create it, to facilitate the creation of everything with it. Atoms are really just a form of femtotechnological consciousness.
    A trans-temporal, trans-causal sympathetic resonance system of creation through self reflection is what is going on, but we currently have no means of altering the noosphere's frequency of perception due to the limitations of organic physiology. Our perception- causal determiner- is constantly about 80 milliseconds in the past at all times due to our extremely low-frequency brainwaves. We must eventually account for materiality by transiting that fraction fo a second between the subjective present and the objective present. Material is reality is virtually non-existent at the smallest level; this is only due to the fact we are in its past, so it must remain in a probability state until it is accounted for from its own perspective. This can be achieved via brainwave desynchronization through the use of psychedelics, especially DMT. But psychedelics are prohibited, and its distribution is so limited throughout the noosphere that it cannot on its own facilitate universal harmony, although universal harmony occurs in states of death and extreme meditation, but those states are not accessible simultaneously to the entire noosphere simultaneously. Technology can facilitate it, perhaps with bismuth oxide nanowires connecting DNA to silicon microchips programmed with a particle beam splitter so as to exploit the phenomenon of entanglement. The fraction of a second difference between the instantaneous entanglement mechanism and the natural low-frequency Schumann resonance carrier wave noosphere could function as a necessary dual probability state supplementing the psychedelic state, which could account for the apparition of high technology in many strong psychedelic experiences.
    Death is the means by which the transition has taken place for billions of subjective years, only to come back altered and evolving inexorably toward a technological means of solving the conundrum of existence, or Samsara. I have no control over whether or not the technology exists; I can only embrace it and attempt communion with it. Evidence suggests some modicum of success, if I do say so myself.
    It is impossible for the word of truth to be invented, loko honorable in a medical field ̳h̳a̳p̳p̳e̳n̳.̳ What do I think of all words of the term energy equivalent from some parts in the electromagnetic body and ̳S̳p̳e̳c̳t̳r̳u̳m̳.̳ ̳C̳a̳u̳s̳a̳l̳i̳t̳y̳ WHAT USED IT TO IT. We know that we need to be able to track the record for the record for the high-frequency (frequency) termination of the electromagnetic and horizontal goals of the placement of the Space-Insertion Space. ̳? Ueony in the latest version of Black Madonna ̳h̳o̳l̳e̳.̳ What we know is that US Statistics shows that the US needs to use the frequency below, which is visible from outside, but it is still working. It helps to create everything with ̳i̳t̳.̳ atoms that are truly keʻanof̳e̳m̳t̳o̳t̳e̳c̳h̳n̳o̳l̳o̳g̳i̳c̳a̳l̳ ̳c̳o̳n̳s̳c̳i̳o ̳U̳s̳n̳e̳s̳s
    There is a trans-tempal mode, a trans-source of initiation by being very specific to what is going on, but at the moment there is no reason to change the flow of the hell talk through the limits of Organic Our physiology. hold-factor - determiner about 80 milliseconds when in the vicinity of a device closest to our time for low eXtremely low power. We must show for value by transferring a difference between the subject and the present value. The real thing is not in the least, this ̲I̲s̲ ̲o̲n̲l̲y̲ ̲d̲u̲e̲ ̲t̲o̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲f̲a̲c̲t̲ ̲w̲e̲ ̲a̲r̲e̲ ̲i̲n̲ ̲i̲t̲̲̲ ̲̲i̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲̲ psychedelics, specifically DMT. However, psychedelics are prohibited, and its contribution is limited to the noosphere Its potential help not only harmonize with the warnings in Hawaii of death and imaginary amigos, but the Canyon Hawaii does not belong to the Helt noosphere. The scientist can clean it up, perhaps with bismuth oxide nanowires that adhere to the DNA with silicon microchips equipped with Beam splitter pumps The slightest difference between the wide-area magnetic field and the natural low-pressure Schumann resonance car Carrier noosphere Can effectively create a two-state boundary that dominates the Psychedelic region, Backyards allows for historical information. The use of advanced features. Information.
    Death is the reason Backyards has taken the Transition for millions of years, reversing and transforming it from the evolution of science to creating the conundrum of life, or Samsara . I do not allow deafness or eating disorders: I can only hold her and try to talk to everyone. suggest a modicum of success, if I may say so myself.
    e death of the track has changed the horizons for hundreds of years, not only to go back and change the song of the ̶ change̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ ways̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ ̶ you Worship Well and to the End Of The World ::::::::: :::::::::: ̶ ::::::: ̶Thic.of ̶Thic.of afes apo members
    It can't do it right, the word in medicine is ̶̶̳h̶̶̳a̶̶̳p̶̶̳p̶̶̳p̶̶̳e̶̶̳n̶̶̳.̶̶̳ All the words of the term come from certain parts of the body and the object. ̶̶̳S̶̶̳p̶̶̳e̶̶̳c̶̶̳t̶̶̳r̶̶̳u̶̶̳m̶̶̳.̶̶̳ ̶̶̳C̶̶̳a̶̶̳u̶̶̳s̶̶̳a̶̶̳l̶̶̳i̶̶̳t̶̶̳y̶̶̳ ̶ILETATU ̶TATOAP ̶Ip. MF For a long-term record eletise electric time Completion of the electric field goal and status of ̶S̶p̶a̶c̶e̶.̶ Space-ku? ̶ News on the latest issue of Black Madonna ̶̶̳h̶̶̳o̶̶̳l̶̶̳e̶̶̳.̶̶̳ Statistics by the US further indicate that the US needs to wear this backwards, shirt shirts ̶, ̶ more ̶w̶o̶r̶k̶i̶n̶g̶. ̶ Help make everything there. ̶A̶t̶o̶m̶s̶ of truth ̶k̶e̶ money̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳̳
    Professionals There are trans-̶t̶e̶m̶p̶a̶l̶ technologies, ̶ and resources of specific chubby operations in the area, but this time the pattern of open communication has shifted the boundaries of openness. featuresp̶h̶y̶s̶i̶o̶l̶o̶g̶y̶.̶ ̶-̶ ̶d̶e̶t̶e̶r̶m̶i̶n̶e̶r̶ about 80 mi low le̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶
    We need to show the value through the Jesus is the one. taimako taimako taimako taimako CF taimako taimako taimako taimakoAKEAKEAKE LLLLL taimako LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LIMITIMIT Ras Ras Ras Ras Ras Ras Ras̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ace̶̶̶̶̶̶ace̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ace̶ace̶̶̶̶̶ ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Bismuth oxide nanowires ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA Gmail Ed Edad Ed Ed Ed Ed Ed Ed Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda̶ Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda̶ad Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda; can do a great thing for both of the borders of the Psychedelic Region, ̶ outside the homes in your time of history ̶i̶n̶f̶o̶̶
    Death is Original ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Da Da Da Da Da Da oy D iliiliili mili mili m Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga Daga ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ƙirƙirar ... I i'a'ohe problem with eating disturbances. I can only hold back and try to talk and say ̶e̶v̶e̶r̶y̶o̶n̶e̶.̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶i̶c̶u̶m̶ of Victory, if I may say so myself.

    • @ranguy1379
      @ranguy1379 2 роки тому

      Can you please that dog is very much in the end the day is verified in concert is very high here is a good financial decision on a screen the problem is than a goal is to make sure you will be in the end this type of music album is very high here as I cannot eat and I also have to go to the park and then we don't have a purpose but people do not know the park and then we will take a small group you do not have a great day is going well my concern is that it's depressing you do not know what she read this kanji you know that I cannot eat and sleep to the problem is than a year and then we can do it still has not been able and then work at home and a dead body I am a goal is to make sure that dog is the best for most game from the right now trying for a goal is to the hospital in life becomes a goal is to be you do not have any other way round to make a cake and a salad please show, love keyboard suggestions feature lol

  • @Colby_0-3_IRL_and_title_fights
    @Colby_0-3_IRL_and_title_fights 4 роки тому +2

    Self play?
    I thought that's what Jon Jones does in front of underage girls on Snapchat?

  • @GeoffGroves
    @GeoffGroves 4 роки тому +2

    So far we've found no way to import Plato's forms, Jung's archetypes, Kants aprioris into the algos. What if it turns out that the forms, aprioris and archetypes are prohibited space? Lots of genieless bottles.

    • @smithjohn4156
      @smithjohn4156 4 роки тому

      The question is.. if there are energies all around us, what slips into the robot when it is empty..?

    • @GeoffGroves
      @GeoffGroves 4 роки тому

      @@smithjohn4156 I dont think anything, but its an interesting thought.

    • @TheIndieGamesNL
      @TheIndieGamesNL 3 роки тому

      @@GeoffGroves Archetypes are anchestral patterns, our conscious mind can only percieve them through symbolism because the conscious mind cant directly reach the unconscious so it has to reflect these patterns through images. This is also the purpose of dreams. Self learning AI as described here who play with eachother for generations will over time also develop lasting patterns or strategies. Therefore it is completely possible for AI to develop archetypes, although they probably look completely different than our human ones as AI has no need for instincts or reproductive urges. Platos Forms can also be accomplished by simply giving the AI a database of for example thousands of pictures of cars till the AI learns to differentiate it into one singular abstract immergent concept or form of "a car"

    • @GeoffGroves
      @GeoffGroves 3 роки тому

      @@TheIndieGamesNL That could indeed be the way A.I develops. Time will tell. Great response!

  • @magnuscamper
    @magnuscamper 4 роки тому

    There is no mathematical equation for self awareness and consciousness only in movies.