What Really Happened To Giant Flying Boats?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,3 тис.

  • @danversnettlefold793
    @danversnettlefold793 3 роки тому +2194

    Leaves one feeling nostalgia for a lost future.

    • @piotrmalewski8178
      @piotrmalewski8178 3 роки тому +36

      If world's population didn't reproduce like rabbits it could have been.

    • @liamriley9816
      @liamriley9816 3 роки тому +144

      Take solace in knowing that in a parallel universe, these aircraft won out and today they are so big they have casinos and saunas on them.

    • @joemama-fz2gl
      @joemama-fz2gl 3 роки тому +87

      @@liamriley9816 but instead were stuck with stupid planes with small leg room and a claustrophobic feel

    • @cynicalyinsane5076
      @cynicalyinsane5076 3 роки тому +34

      Really does just shows you that the wars and the limits of pols imaginations are what has lost alot of these amazing machines to the past I think the biggest issue like you see with alot of these designs is the technology didn't fit the vision at the time and just wasn't up to par for what the person had in mind, ppl had wild and amazing ideas but never had the imagination to believe that just maybe one day with time and patience we might crack it and finally figure out the flaws

    • @geetarguy777
      @geetarguy777 3 роки тому +25

      I don’t see why the military doesn’t have a fighter flying boat that can just land and take off from water...

  • @nicholasaudy6064
    @nicholasaudy6064 4 роки тому +4178

    Bring tears to my eyes that this kind of concept failed. Looks like something straight out of an alternate universe

    • @scootergeorge9576
      @scootergeorge9576 4 роки тому +29

      You probably think the Bristol Brabazon was a great idea too. ua-cam.com/video/A6psEAOaJeQ/v-deo.html

    • @tommycouser656
      @tommycouser656 4 роки тому +124

      i was just thinking the same thing. This looks like a steampunk design.

    • @mrvespuccia.k.ameganite1747
      @mrvespuccia.k.ameganite1747 4 роки тому +118

      The plane would fit in the fallout universe if the plane just looked a bit more 1950s (which it already looks) I can just imagine a commercial for this by Poseidon energy on a wall somewhere and the enclave was able to hold on to one after the war.

    • @scootergeorge9576
      @scootergeorge9576 4 роки тому +5

      @@mrvespuccia.k.ameganite1747 - Could you please translate that into English?

    • @blackleprechaun7966
      @blackleprechaun7966 4 роки тому +60

      If not for WW2 this very well might have been the reality today.

  • @jackturner9985
    @jackturner9985 4 роки тому +3195

    I swear to God this channel is going places. The animation skills and the effort it takes for research etc must be astounding ! We salute you, Sir Mustard!

    • @depausvandelilithkerk5785
      @depausvandelilithkerk5785 4 роки тому +79

      Yes, I agree. Mustard really have put some extra mustard on that mustard in this Mustard video.

    • @williamfulgham2010
      @williamfulgham2010 4 роки тому +22

      @@depausvandelilithkerk5785 all that mustard talk has made me hungry. I think I will go eat now.

    • @danroberts9050
      @danroberts9050 4 роки тому +8

      20 years from now this channel is replaced by ..... the flying boat! LOL

    • @saratov99
      @saratov99 4 роки тому +2

      So where is MiG-25 episode?

    • @marygrech7644
      @marygrech7644 4 роки тому

      You have e no writ to aware to God o r by God

  • @6rimR3ap3r
    @6rimR3ap3r 3 роки тому +1845

    Flying boats really feel like a successor to blimp traveling. Luxurious, slower paced traveling with extravagant solutions. It's a shame this idea didn't even survive for the rich.

    • @Rob.N771
      @Rob.N771 3 роки тому +41

      Well said sir.

    • @Noobie2k7
      @Noobie2k7 3 роки тому +140

      Yeah, i feel Flying Boats might have survived if those trying to keep them around didn't keep putting them in direct competition with Land plane air-liners, which they just lose out too on almost all the points they were trying to fight on. If they'd just kept pushing Sea-planes as more an alternative to cruise ships and luxury travel it might well have worked. Like Push Sea-Planes not as a simple mode of transport but as a part of the experience. Like they did with Airships at first.

    • @setro5582
      @setro5582 3 роки тому +20

      Final Fantasy stares from a distance.

    • @sevenravens
      @sevenravens 3 роки тому +33

      Would love to travel in a zeppelin across the Atlantic or anywhere! Would be awesome to just fly across America low and slow and just watch the world go by.

    • @Rebotified
      @Rebotified 3 роки тому +22

      If only we had a elon like guy to invest.

  • @jaymaster103
    @jaymaster103 4 роки тому +480

    Man this channel is therapeutic, you have vast amounts of knowledge and everything just flows. You keep me glued to my screen the entire video. Animations on point. Keep up the good work.

    • @jch8175
      @jch8175 4 роки тому +4

      Jay I am legally unable to like due to you a having 69. I would unfortunately be hurting you by doing so

    • @AlonsoUQ
      @AlonsoUQ 4 роки тому +2

      I agree

  • @akam9919
    @akam9919 4 роки тому +2154

    Love hate this channel:
    They show something cool, then tell you why it didn't work.

    • @megaclodsire
      @megaclodsire 4 роки тому +114

      In an ideal world, we would make giant aircraft just for the hell of it

    • @meghanachauhan9380
      @meghanachauhan9380 4 роки тому +20

      They show you cool, then throw shit on it :(

    • @meghanachauhan9380
      @meghanachauhan9380 4 роки тому +8

      @@megaclodsire probably one with low population. But that world wouldn't be much rich cuz capitalism needs a lot of people to spend a lot of money to work. So the government would need to undertake it. But it wouldn't cuz democracy and political drama

    • @erickg3508
      @erickg3508 4 роки тому +2

      and you need ro see what happened to the comet the one that tanked this type of aircrafts... crazy!

    • @davemccombs
      @davemccombs 4 роки тому +2

      Or over-the-top sponsor asskissing, something cool, sponsor asskissing, sponsor asskissing. My god, this channel has more spots than a dalmation.

  • @nathanielw8234
    @nathanielw8234 4 роки тому +867

    "...designed for a future that never existed"
    *damn that part hit hard*

    • @jdg9999
      @jdg9999 4 роки тому +54

      Every time I see stuff about the post-WW2 British aircraft industry it makes me imagine an alternate universe where Britain remains a superpower and can keep developing awesome stuff instead of losing all its industries.

    • @nathanielw8234
      @nathanielw8234 4 роки тому +16

      ​@@jdg9999 Indeed, it's quite a shame that Britain had to suffer so much throughout WW2. Good thing America swooped in and had their back.

    • @L0stJ0hnny
      @L0stJ0hnny 4 роки тому +10

      @@jdg9999 - 17.4 million Brits believe that they're actually living in that alternate universe…

    • @nathanielw8234
      @nathanielw8234 4 роки тому +1

      @@L0stJ0hnny I don't blame them. They suffered so much morale loss, something had to boost their ego. Just ask Winston Churchill.

    • @basswarnow
      @basswarnow 4 роки тому

      me_irl

  • @porthos6118
    @porthos6118 3 роки тому +457

    I can still remember the sound of the "Cattalina" flying boats taking off from their base in Rose Bay in Sydney Harbour. There was about 2 miles of runway markers set out on the water. But just that glorious sound of big prop engines revving, building speed and then slowly trailing off into the distance. Sorry starting to tear up of days gone by. Thanks for the vid.

    • @hebn.
      @hebn. 3 роки тому +13

      The Catalina has always been a plane that I'd adored since I first saw it as a kid. I once got to see a shell of one that was being restored, but never a complete one, let alone get to see one flying. I bet that was quite a sight to behold. I did however get to sit in a Bristol Beaufighter in Melbourne, that was quite surreal.

    • @stanpolchinski8956
      @stanpolchinski8956 2 роки тому +1

      cancel all feeds?

    • @tomgreene7942
      @tomgreene7942 2 роки тому +7

      Ah, my family went to Catalina Island, California, back in the early 70s, and my two oldest brothers got to fly home on a Catalina flying boat. I was so jealous and couldn't wait until I'd be old enough to do it too. Too late, the line was closed down. At least I got to see it take off and land. A beauty to behold.

    • @robbie9030
      @robbie9030 9 місяців тому +1

      A great plane was the Catalina. I’ve never seen one flying.

  • @JP-1990
    @JP-1990 4 роки тому +2765

    "Made for a future that never existed"
    I think I know this feeling.

    • @assassinaria
      @assassinaria 4 роки тому +58

      Except this time, we are in the alternate universe.

    • @ElwoodBlues830
      @ElwoodBlues830 4 роки тому +24

      That's the same idea for the self-driving car. Maybe...

    • @hyri3188
      @hyri3188 4 роки тому +27

      Elwood Blues I hope so. Self driving should only be an assist, not a full function you know?

    • @howardwayne3974
      @howardwayne3974 4 роки тому +12

      In my dreams I live in the 1920's piloting a china clipper to midway island.

    • @Applekuchenthetasty
      @Applekuchenthetasty 4 роки тому +7

      We got the boring time line

  • @tristar1012
    @tristar1012 4 роки тому +1260

    Today is a good day. Eat your heart out Valentine's Day I'm here for Mustard's amazing aviation videos!

    • @miniena7774
      @miniena7774 4 роки тому +3

      TriStar 101
      Don’t tell me what to do.

    • @sirrliv
      @sirrliv 4 роки тому +4

      I choose to think it is appropriate, celebrating a romantic dream of travel from the past.

    • @jimdavis8391
      @jimdavis8391 4 роки тому +1

      Only Valentines interest me are the tanks.

    • @CRohitSorte
      @CRohitSorte 4 роки тому

      Only Aviation

    • @evonrn2000
      @evonrn2000 4 роки тому

      @@miniena7774 Be Told what to do...it's already Done!You were Told😂

  • @CommaV9414
    @CommaV9414 4 роки тому +247

    'Travel over 9000 kilometers'
    You awakened a long forgotten part of my brain with that line

  • @shevetlevi2821
    @shevetlevi2821 4 роки тому +501

    I've always loved those flying boats of the 1930's like the Boeing 314 in "Raiders of the Lost Ark". They were kind of the aviation equivalent of the Orient Express. Any plane that has multiple levels, bars, restaurants and sleeping cabins is very cool.

    • @barfuss2007
      @barfuss2007 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/v2aaXfqxFrQ/v-deo.html

    • @markprange4386
      @markprange4386 2 роки тому +6

      I remember the Martin 404's sound when it flew over Oxford, Mississippi in the early 1970s.

    • @shevetlevi2821
      @shevetlevi2821 Рік тому +4

      @@shastamccoy7777 I know exactly what you're talking about. You see that route animation in old movies. It goes perfectly with these beautiful old planes.

    • @shevetlevi2821
      @shevetlevi2821 Рік тому +2

      @@shastamccoy7777 :-) Have a good weekend.

    • @mattperson7293
      @mattperson7293 10 місяців тому +1

      There was no Boeing 314 in Raiders. That was a Shorts Solent Mk.III

  • @erode.5101
    @erode.5101 4 роки тому +1199

    Saunders-Roe: Foldable wingtips
    Boeing: *Aight, let's do that*

    • @lp11thewolf79
      @lp11thewolf79 4 роки тому +12

      The 777x

    • @martijn9568
      @martijn9568 4 роки тому +39

      Cough, any postwar US Navy carrier plane

    • @FearlessLeader2001
      @FearlessLeader2001 4 роки тому +10

      Didn't Blohm & Voss and Consolidated do that as well, earlier in the 20th century?

    • @rozeone6973
      @rozeone6973 4 роки тому +1

      lol

    • @erode.5101
      @erode.5101 4 роки тому +2

      But I don't think they made passenger models, they all made military models

  • @ShelbyAQD
    @ShelbyAQD 3 роки тому +208

    Flying boats are an oddly nostalgic thing for me. It probably stems from seeing fantastical versions of them in so many shows and games in my childhood. I can't help thinking that right now would be a great time to begin developing a new generation of these aircraft.
    They might never be as efficient or cheap as a standard plane, but they offer such whimsy that it definitely seems worth it to me.

    • @m2heavyindustries378
      @m2heavyindustries378 2 роки тому +2

      Certainly, if you have the investment money to start work on one

    • @pgmreallaw
      @pgmreallaw 2 роки тому +13

      I would imagine modern technology could make them more efficient and if we had more planes able to land on water, it would alleviate crowded land-based airports which pose a significant environmental cost (rainwater runoff, loss of vegetation, over-development, etc.). Landing on water would free up some infrastructure investments as really only a port would have to be built rather than a large field covered over in concrete.

  • @sentinelcheese3420
    @sentinelcheese3420 4 роки тому +343

    9:50 That's a shame for someone so amazingly talented get demonetized for just talking about history.
    I wonder if covering topics regarding automotive would suit your channel. There's a lot in terms of development and strange creations that took place you could cover about like the Brabham BT46-B, The Tucker car, Chrysler Turbine car or the amazing creations of Lotus boss Colin Chapman. Or even just record breakers like the Spirit of Australia or Donald Campbell. Love to see such videos on your channel in the future! :)

    • @mj6463
      @mj6463 4 роки тому +9

      Yeah, I never saw that mig 25 video :(

    • @augustovasconcellos7173
      @augustovasconcellos7173 4 роки тому +9

      @@mj6463 wait, did he actually make that MIG-25 video? I've been following his channel for a long time now and I don't remember him ever posting it.

    • @nybotor
      @nybotor 4 роки тому +4

      Some automotive videos would be good, like the history of the McLaren F1, the first gen Ford Taurus, GM EV1, and maybe even a video on British Leyland!

    • @Hyntin
      @Hyntin 4 роки тому +9

      Unfortunately we're all just a tad bit too stupid to decide on our own what to consume and might make a "wrong" decision. How scary would that be? I don't even want to think of it! It's OK though. They know what we should see and learn and will do their best to make sure we choose correctly. Thank you big brother for watching over me. :)

    • @williammagoffin9324
      @williammagoffin9324 4 роки тому +14

      UA-cam currently believes that anything related to "human conflict" is unsuitable for monetization and thus will be blacklisted by the algorithm. To paraphrase Karl from IntrangeTV: "human conflict" describes all of human history. History is just one subject on UA-cam's shit list, they are targeting channels dedicated to scientific inquiry and human rights as well. Bloke on the Range just has a recent video featuring a discussion between him and Karl about running their respective channels and how the current owners of UA-cam are stifling discussion of things they in some cases should be encouraging. As Indy Neidell has suggested all UA-cam really wants is videos on cats on vacuum cleaners.

  • @mokopaneledwaba2189
    @mokopaneledwaba2189 4 роки тому +1039

    Made for a future that never existed
    Concorde: want a hug?

    • @talalzahid2241
      @talalzahid2241 3 роки тому +7

      Idiot, concorde served for almost 3 decades !!

    • @karlsonchee2701
      @karlsonchee2701 3 роки тому +28

      @@talalzahid2241 on a small scale. compare to thier original goal to revolutionized air travel, I would say the concorde is a failure

    • @CatalinaThePirate
      @CatalinaThePirate 3 роки тому +9

      😕 I want a hug. I love flying boats. 😳

    • @terminator3000
      @terminator3000 3 роки тому +10

      @@talalzahid2241 the concorde was a heavily subsidized prestige object. Not really a revolution in airtravel.

    • @venusreena2532
      @venusreena2532 3 роки тому +2

      @@karlsonchee2701 ... glass half empty?

  • @bobthetree5935
    @bobthetree5935 4 роки тому +1565

    The flying boats remind me of airships from studio Ghibli movies.

    • @IvanQuaglia
      @IvanQuaglia 4 роки тому +12

      me too

    • @superroydude
      @superroydude 4 роки тому +89

      Miyazaki is known to be a plane enthusiast so im sure that was intentional.

    • @Tigershark_3082
      @Tigershark_3082 4 роки тому +76

      @@superroydude Not only that, his father worked in the aviation industry during and after WWII. Planes are such interesting things, as they fulfill humanity's desires of flight. I can tell you from experience that flying is so freeing. Anyway, take care and have a great day!

    • @kwaivioussankensa3664
      @kwaivioussankensa3664 4 роки тому +31

      They remind me of those planes from nausicaa of the valley of the wind that the army used

    • @lucianmoore6012
      @lucianmoore6012 4 роки тому +34

      Porco Rosso is a fabulous film

  • @stixheaven6789
    @stixheaven6789 4 роки тому +96

    Had a small heart attack when I saw the mig 25 video PLEASE MAKE ONE its probably my favourite plane. A video on it would be amazing!

    • @robd6122
      @robd6122 4 роки тому +9

      Sigh... If only UA-cam (and advertisers) can understand that knife is only a weapon when you want it to be a weapon and the same applies with anything basically

    • @kutter_ttl6786
      @kutter_ttl6786 4 роки тому +3

      If he does make one it'll probably be a Nebula exclusive. The way UA-cam algorithms works it wouldn't be worth his time to put it here.

    • @stixheaven6789
      @stixheaven6789 4 роки тому

      @@kutter_ttl6786 yeah, it's unfortunate but I guess that's the way it is

  • @LiterallyMark1
    @LiterallyMark1 4 роки тому +2565

    Instead we sit in rows like people in sweat shops.
    Edit: I take it back lol dunno why I said that and why so many people agree, this is the only reason why flights are affordable

    • @hoppinonabronzeleg9477
      @hoppinonabronzeleg9477 4 роки тому +209

      And sit next to morbidly fat people who's flab constantly squeezes around the armrests!

    • @LionsGateCorp
      @LionsGateCorp 4 роки тому +87

      Indeed. Greed always wins its way, sadly.

    • @m2heavyindustries378
      @m2heavyindustries378 4 роки тому +40

      If less people flew, then this wouldn't be a problem- mass flying is the issue, not plane tech. Peasants

    • @probablynotabigtoe9407
      @probablynotabigtoe9407 4 роки тому +93

      You can always pay for 1st class... There Is a reason more legroom costs more money.

    • @jamesgarrison6430
      @jamesgarrison6430 4 роки тому +25

      Sweat shops have more room between rows

  • @Gribbo9999
    @Gribbo9999 4 роки тому +77

    I remember sometime in the early '60s I took a trip to the Isle of White with my parents and the Princesses were still sitting on the Saunders-Roe slipway . It was before the 747 had ever flown and it's size was an impressive site for a young feller. I think we may have been on a pleasure boat trip because I even remember the guide on the boat saying something about "white elephants' as we passed the yard - which I thought was funny having never heard the idiom before.

    • @davidhowe6905
      @davidhowe6905 2 роки тому

      Yes, I remember seeing one too, about the same time, must have been on a school trip from London. To be frank, even by then it was a sorry sight (but obviously still memorable!)

    • @paulmcmahon1129
      @paulmcmahon1129 2 роки тому +1

      I saw those abandoned hulls/fuselages lying in the mud about the same time. Amazing, but really sad for a plane-mad kid.
      Nobody believed me when I talked about them: finally, proof that I wasn't dreaming!
      Thanks for that.

    • @davidjones332
      @davidjones332 2 роки тому +1

      I remember seeing them too, at that same time but I'm sure we walked past the yard and viewed them from the nose. I remember they were cocooned in some sort of silvery plastic material which was coming loose and flapping around one of the hatches. They were the first large aircraft I had ever seen close up, and hugely impressive.

  • @affandi99
    @affandi99 4 роки тому +100

    Saunders-Roe Princess
    Now that is something new to learn and makes me more curious. Thank you Mustard !

  • @misterribal
    @misterribal 4 роки тому +963

    Imagine an airline has one flying boat jet-powered airliner today, they could offer really remote locations for cheaper and even organise a cruise ship like trip. They would own an untapped part of the market. This has potential

    • @jielynsabarez2693
      @jielynsabarez2693 4 роки тому +88

      It could also open up ocean airports, the airports could be used as a refueling station. The only thing Im concerned about is the pollution it would make in it's wake.

    • @drdewott9154
      @drdewott9154 4 роки тому +64

      If such a market was catered for then so many islands like St Helena wouldn't have to invest the sums into constructing airports

    • @Airwerxco
      @Airwerxco 4 роки тому +77

      A vehicle that can offer charter air travel to remote locations without an airport for a small number of interested passengers.. Yes if only a craft like this existed.
      *cough* Helicopters *cough*

    • @KamikazeCommie501
      @KamikazeCommie501 4 роки тому +1

      nope

    • @Skullair313
      @Skullair313 4 роки тому +26

      This would be wildly inefficient. Like the jet-train and zeppelins it is just not competitive to modern jets

  • @alexnagessar4302
    @alexnagessar4302 4 роки тому +43

    When Mustard uploads, my heart nearly stops. I LOVE YOUR VIDS

  • @timpassmore7455
    @timpassmore7455 2 роки тому +104

    It's a mystery how Saunders Roe lasted as long as it did. Their largest production run was only 31 airplanes, and those delivered to the RAF were only in service a few years.
    Worst was the Lerwick that was dangerously unstable.
    Another failure was a jet powered fighter that the RAF "...concluded that the design was incapable of matching up to the performance of land-based designs".
    Kittiwake 1
    A.3 Valkyrie 1
    A.4 Medina 1
    A.14 1
    A.7 Severn 1
    A17 Cutty Sark 12 Short service life
    A.19 Cloud 22 " "
    A.21 Windhover 2
    A.27 London 31 Introduced 1936 Retired 1941
    A.19 Cloud 22 Last one delivered 1935 Withdrawn 1939
    A.33 1
    A.36 Lerwick 21 Very unstable 11 lost in accidents
    A.37 Shrimp 1 Developmental only
    SR.A/1 3 Jet flying boat fighter
    SR.45 Princess 1 as described in this video
    After this, no further seaplanes left the drawing board.
    They did have one land based plane of which 17 were built, but it was designed by someone else.

    • @doankhang9496
      @doankhang9496 2 роки тому +7

      they built hulls for other flying boats in their earlier years

    • @Irfan87
      @Irfan87 2 роки тому +2

      Private backing?

    • @tspcrowther
      @tspcrowther Рік тому +2

      They were also developing helicopters and hovercraft that likely helped them stay afloat.

  • @hevendor958
    @hevendor958 4 роки тому +237

    a Flying Boat Hotel
    *oh HELL YEAH THIS FLYING BOAT IS MY TYPE*

    • @handlemonium
      @handlemonium 4 роки тому +5

      Yeah kinda like an A380 and Concord Luxery combined, but slower xD

    • @solunasunrise
      @solunasunrise 4 роки тому +1

      flyin boat casino and opium den

  • @laszlokaestner5766
    @laszlokaestner5766 4 роки тому +205

    Saunders-Roe were an amazing company that, towards the end, had little luck with actually selling stuff. Not only did they produce the last and arguably greatest flying boats but they built the first hovercraft (as shown). They also built Black Knight/Black arrow which was Great Britain's entry into the space race. The Prospero satellite launched by Black Arrow is still in orbit and still apparently broadcasting its radio ping.
    The Princess car and passenger hovercraft that crossed the English Channel were built in the same hanger as the Princess Flying Boat!
    Most recently the successors to SARO in East Cowes now part of the GKN group make winglets and have about a third of the world market. Most Boeing and Airbus types have been made there. Also some of the major design for the A380 was undertaken at the East Cowes site so they still do big!
    The hanger that made both types of Princess now makes aluminium high speed water craft. This venture - Wight Shipyard - is quickly making a name as one of the best in the world in this field. Recent boats include the newest Thames Clipper, and two ferry/party boats for Cancun in Mexico. Currently they are building four craft for Malta.

    • @Automatic-Diaphragm
      @Automatic-Diaphragm 4 роки тому

      Thanks for the info, that's exactly what I expected from the video when they started with the M&A diagram but moved on prematurely :D

    • @johnburns4017
      @johnburns4017 4 роки тому

      Britain's entry into space exploration was well before Black Knight.
      ua-cam.com/video/wWFFzL65dEQ/v-deo.html

    • @cedriclynch
      @cedriclynch 4 роки тому +1

      The day after the satellite Prospero was launched in October 1971, the UK government cancelled its space programme.

  • @stormtrooper6602
    @stormtrooper6602 4 роки тому +69

    9:41 mig-25....i really love that fighter...

    • @LogieT2K
      @LogieT2K 4 роки тому +2

      Storm trooper awesome bit of soviet engineering

    • @Axemantitan
      @Axemantitan 4 роки тому +4

      Are we going to get to see the MiG-25 video?

  • @raijinmeister
    @raijinmeister 2 роки тому +53

    It's incredible how back in the 50-60-70s so many designs were concerned with ppassengers' comfort, a clear contrast with what we have nowadays.

    • @Ushio01
      @Ushio01 2 роки тому +17

      They also cost a fortune to fly on them. The Boeing 707 and DC-8 all had standard seats with 34 inches of pitch. Today economy is 28-30 inches while business class is 36 inches.
      For seat width todays first class is just 22 inches while economy is 17 inches while back in the 60's economy had 21 inches!
      The sacrifice for flying to be affordable for middle and lower income is todays economy class. Back then even the cheap seats were business class pricing.
      1952 was also an interesting year since not only was it this flying boat and the Comet both having their first flights but the SS United States became the fastest ocean liner to cross the Atlantic.
      It really showed the change from the industrial age to the modern age.

    • @MarikHavair
      @MarikHavair Рік тому +1

      Well, they were mostly accommodating the rich, the same change happened with passenger trains.

  • @sirmartinfrobisher
    @sirmartinfrobisher 4 роки тому +140

    I have big memories of the Princess. In my final years at school just outside Southampton. I discovered that the council was opening an Adventure Centre on the old seaplane base at Calshot. I asked the school if they could organise for us to attend there each week for sailing lessons (the dream of my life). The answer came back, yes and yes. So each week about 20 of us travelled to Calshot. There were two Princesses, mothballed on the slipway, looking very forelorn. She had to get the dinghy masts under their wings. There was no chance of flying but they still sit in the worn glow. I am 71 and still sail, so it was a good public investment.

  • @csours
    @csours 4 роки тому +129

    9:21 Strangely Futuristic and Archaic at the same time; That's how the 1950's Britain do.

    • @TheInselaffen
      @TheInselaffen 4 роки тому +7

      Great inspiration for Thunderbirds though.

    • @zakofrx
      @zakofrx 4 роки тому

      I am very pissed that I missed the Giant Flying Boats.
      Flying around the world on a Pan Am Clipper would have been and experience.
      The world just moved slower for those with means back then and you got to enjoy the trip.

    • @TheInselaffen
      @TheInselaffen 4 роки тому +6

      @@zakofrx very few had 'means.' Nostalgia is rubbish. I am quite happy with now.

    • @shebbs1
      @shebbs1 4 роки тому

      @@TheInselaffen True, and likely future generations will feel the same as you about our time, will be interesting to see how 2020 is regarded.

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 4 роки тому +1

      Owain Shebbeare
      As of 2020 we are nostalgic about the times when we even could fly...

  • @LemonToGo
    @LemonToGo 4 роки тому +191

    The gods of aviation have blessed us on this holy Friday!

  • @VibeXplorer
    @VibeXplorer 2 роки тому +4

    It simply doesn't get better than the technique and approach Mustard uses. The visual style is perfect and period-specific. He could have detailed the aircraft's design by depicting it sitting in the water or floating in a black void but instead, he turns it into a model on a desktop in an office or den complete with bookshelves in the background. Genius!

    • @Kanbei11
      @Kanbei11 Рік тому

      Just a pity they didn't put that much effort into pronouncing Farnborough properly

  • @super-cacti
    @super-cacti 4 роки тому +89

    I....I am speachless.
    You actualy made a video of one of my favorite aircraft!
    Thank you so much!

    • @dpswets
      @dpswets 4 роки тому +1

      Good to see you here as well ;)
      - Capt_Versteegh

    • @super-cacti
      @super-cacti 4 роки тому +1

      @@dpswets Ah yes, everyone watches Mustard videos xD

  • @charliebrown3607
    @charliebrown3607 4 роки тому +67

    1:37, not the only time a plane has landed in the Hudson.

    • @alifsyafiq4611
      @alifsyafiq4611 4 роки тому +4

      That come also to my mind actually...

  • @phoenixnoire2435
    @phoenixnoire2435 4 роки тому +436

    "Designed for a future that never existed."
    You can say that about a lot of things, but wouldn't it be cool to see the futures where they did?

    • @ashakydd1
      @ashakydd1 4 роки тому +28

      Flying boats definitely were a more romantic concept than practical, in the long run. I would have loved to have seen that massive, final flying boat get built.

    • @gazaalley3862
      @gazaalley3862 4 роки тому +3

      @TukiRaja on twitch yessss

    • @EmeraldForester777
      @EmeraldForester777 4 роки тому +2

      Yes, a future where they have giant, nuclear-powered boat planes.

    • @spinyslasher6586
      @spinyslasher6586 4 роки тому

      If you want a future with even more pollution, then go ahead.

    • @phoenixnoire2435
      @phoenixnoire2435 4 роки тому +1

      @TukiRaja on twitch or SNES-era RPG's?

  • @markbigbadbear
    @markbigbadbear 3 роки тому +18

    Man, I only stumbled across your website this afternoon. I'm amazed at the quality of your animations. Like in this video. The colour palette makes in the CGI parts make it feel like you're watching a travel flyer come to life. Beautiful :)

  • @garlicapple2244
    @garlicapple2244 4 роки тому +301

    "Princess" isn't the largest flying boat that has ever flown, maybe the largest airliner, but not the largest. The actual largest flying boat was called the "Spruce Goose", or the Hughes H-4 Hercules which is displayed in my town in the Evergreen Museum. Funfact: It has a bunch of beach balls in it that you get to see if you go inside.

    • @leea8706
      @leea8706 4 роки тому +22

      I was trying to remember the name of that! I remember it being mentioned in an episode of Phineas and Ferb where they built their own.

    • @garlicapple2244
      @garlicapple2244 4 роки тому +14

      @@leea8706 Oh my gosh you just brought back a distant memory in me :)! I remember! Ferb and the girls did like a classy musical number in that episode too!

    • @leea8706
      @leea8706 4 роки тому +20

      Garlic Apple that’s exactly right! They also made theirs out of paper (a nod to the Spruce Goose being made out of wood) so that it would disintegrate when it landed on water and the seats were flotation devices. Phineas was also acting like Howard Hughes or someone from that time too. I’m a massive Phineas and Ferb fan, and despite being 32 my mum still buys me Phineas and Ferb stuff for Christmas, like socks or calendars.

    • @leea8706
      @leea8706 4 роки тому +10

      Garlic Apple I’ve just remembered it was called the paper pelican!

    • @MyHeadHz
      @MyHeadHz 4 роки тому +3

      I've been to that museum many times, the spruce goose always amazes!

  • @gabrieltassi4030
    @gabrieltassi4030 4 роки тому +640

    I stopped my shower to watch this

    • @GIPvideos
      @GIPvideos 4 роки тому +12

      I was about to shower before I saw this

    • @IxoraNera
      @IxoraNera 4 роки тому +11

      @leo Ng with your phone??? something feels fishy

    • @asherdie
      @asherdie 4 роки тому +6

      I shower while watching.

    • @althejazzman
      @althejazzman 4 роки тому +2

      I don't shower each time Mustard releases a video. Priorities, right?

    • @sailintothesun3421
      @sailintothesun3421 4 роки тому +2

      I need a shower after watching this

  • @felixcat9318
    @felixcat9318 4 роки тому +46

    This was an accurate, well presented and narrated synopsis of the Flying Boat, with superb graphics and animation.
    A high quality documentary. Subscribed

  • @granttoye5852
    @granttoye5852 3 роки тому +119

    I would love to see a major airline today take a crack at a brand new flying boat concept for 2020. Even if it's just a novelty or a marketing tool

    • @elliottd323
      @elliottd323 3 роки тому +15

      Yes but it would be for the 1 percent as the upkeep costs and if it's so heavy with all the luxury fuel consumption

    • @truthislam6481
      @truthislam6481 3 роки тому +6

      Grant, can you imagine one with electric motors and batteries?
      There is a company in Sweden, I think that B.Gates is funding to produce a small fully electric airliner!

    • @iamarizonaball2642
      @iamarizonaball2642 3 роки тому +3

      I would if I had 1 trillion I would fund any flying boat

    • @kashutosh9132
      @kashutosh9132 3 роки тому +2

      @@iamarizonaball2642
      I will donate 1 trillion to you for this project as soon as I earn 10 trillion

    • @ranran2806
      @ranran2806 3 роки тому +8

      The weight of the batteries alone would be reason enough as to why it’s a bad idea. Not to mention the cost of excavating materials for the batteries would end up with more Emissions.

  • @FalconFastest123
    @FalconFastest123 4 роки тому +482

    If only Jack had met Rose on a flying boat, then everyone would still want them

    • @gregorymoore2877
      @gregorymoore2877 3 роки тому +38

      Pretty sure Jack would have been blow off the nose of the aircraft while in flight. That headwind has got to be pretty strong. "I'm king of the worrrrrllll...."

    • @nabbitgohome9672
      @nabbitgohome9672 3 роки тому +9

      And instead of an ice berg causing the down fall now a whirlwind/tornado or hurricane and or a ice or sandstorm.

    • @HowToChangeName
      @HowToChangeName 3 роки тому +1

      Doesnt matter as both will destroyed by climate change

    • @one-wingedangel5107
      @one-wingedangel5107 3 роки тому +4

      @@HowToChangeName Are you one of those people claiming trees are dying just because leaves are changing colors and falling off during autumn?

    • @HowToChangeName
      @HowToChangeName 3 роки тому +3

      @@one-wingedangel5107 not sure, but im definitely not that guy who cant take joke like you

  • @lancematthews9897
    @lancematthews9897 4 роки тому +147

    I’m just waiting for him to do the AN-225, anyone else ?

  • @rileywags
    @rileywags 4 роки тому +301

    THE ONLY CHANNEL I HAVE NOTIFICATIONS ON AND IM SUBSCRIBED TO 571 CHANNELS

    • @midgetman4206
      @midgetman4206 4 роки тому +10

      Same here, everything about these videos is high quality

    • @spielhund1833
      @spielhund1833 4 роки тому

      Me too

    • @jeffstanley4593
      @jeffstanley4593 4 роки тому

      Patreon would work better.

    • @TheInselaffen
      @TheInselaffen 4 роки тому +1

      How do you ever plan to get to the end of the you tubes?

    • @ahpoiseheh
      @ahpoiseheh 4 роки тому +1

      Just like me ;-) Thought I was the only one!!

  • @kg_canuck
    @kg_canuck 4 роки тому +78

    So if the war hadnt required tons of airfields to be constructed, we might be flying in turbojet ocean liners?

    • @teddytatyo
      @teddytatyo 4 роки тому +28

      It just meant that we would take an extra 10 years to transition to normal land planes. Economics always wins out in the end

  • @sirmeatloaf
    @sirmeatloaf 4 роки тому +604

    Imagine you're chilling on your roof, it's evening. You look up in the sky and see this

    • @raidy5215
      @raidy5215 4 роки тому +50

      *loud propeller noises*

    • @twandepan
      @twandepan 4 роки тому +13

      RaidyTJC it would be quieter than jets of the time I believe

    • @justin.g25
      @justin.g25 4 роки тому +8

      @@twandepan no its way louder.

    • @madzak9847
      @madzak9847 4 роки тому +16

      It woul sound like continious thunder
      BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
      Even when some turboprop IL or TU flying over my house its quite disturbing , windows vibrating and sound is loud even with windows closed

    • @shadowwsk3507
      @shadowwsk3507 4 роки тому +9

      *"BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"*

  • @McHeisenburger
    @McHeisenburger 4 роки тому +335

    Man what I wouldn’t give for flying boat airliners.

    • @MachineMan-mj4gj
      @MachineMan-mj4gj 4 роки тому +10

      I remember seeing designs for an ultra-long range flying boat that used 747's as pontoon floats.

    • @totallyfrozen
      @totallyfrozen 4 роки тому +8

      I’ve been fascinated by them for years. I’ve always wanted to fly in one.

    • @trainfan-ks5hk
      @trainfan-ks5hk 4 роки тому +10

      Practically flying cruise liners

    • @badscrewold3162
      @badscrewold3162 4 роки тому +2

      Let me guess: you wouldn't give your money they were asking for a ticket...

    • @DugrozReports
      @DugrozReports 4 роки тому +6

      Would you give $4,000 - $5,000 for an economy ticket on one? If not, that's why they failed.

  • @Rangayuthtube
    @Rangayuthtube 4 роки тому +479

    they should try to bring it back, sounds like the perfect toy for modern-day billionaires, this beats super yachts Anyday,

    • @ressljs
      @ressljs 4 роки тому +63

      I am kind of surprised there wasn't a small market for flying boats as a type of booze cruise vessel. I could see using them to bounce around resorts in the Caribbean or Mediterranean.

    • @NaenaeGaming
      @NaenaeGaming 4 роки тому +15

      I guess the ultra rich can afford both large aircraft for personal use (everything from a Leerjet to a 747 or even an A380) AND a super yacht, so they wouldn’t be looking for anything in the middle really. If anything, a flying boat would be a compromise - less space than a boat and slower/less efficient than an airliner

    • @idontwanttopickone
      @idontwanttopickone 4 роки тому +2

      I mean there's the AG600.

    • @quantumleap4023
      @quantumleap4023 4 роки тому +4

      @@NaenaeGaming A lot of superyachts already have helicopters on them.

    • @mattdyer9544
      @mattdyer9544 4 роки тому +5

      @@ressljs Many PBY-5 Catalinas were converted after WW2, with the turrets replaced with bubble windows, some are still in service.

  • @SaxonSuccess
    @SaxonSuccess 4 роки тому +17

    I remember seeing them parked up in Cowes. It would have been around 1953 ish, and we sailed from somewhere in Dorset to the I of W on a paddle steamer, then a coach tour around the Island. We were on a holiday visiting relatives in Poole at the time... So steam trains were involved too. Those were the days... (Takes off rose tinted spectacles, and makes a brew.)

    • @tommot7236
      @tommot7236 2 роки тому +1

      Excellent comment! We must both be a similar vintage! 😂👍

    • @bobfreestone1752
      @bobfreestone1752 2 роки тому

      Adrian, Lovely comment that brought back memories aplenty ! I was 5 in '53, and left the IOW having lived near Bembridge for about three years, after my father left the marines based at Southsea. Keep the RT glasses on...... Bob.

  • @GandalfTheWho
    @GandalfTheWho 4 роки тому +34

    Flew to Lord Howe island in a flying boat back when I was a kid, about 50 years ago. A great memory.

  • @grassh0pper
    @grassh0pper 4 роки тому +303

    I have a bit of fear flying over the ocean and this would have calmed me down

    • @VictorDude98
      @VictorDude98 4 роки тому +33

      Especially since you’re pretty much dead if something goes wrong while crossing the Atlantic

    • @ashakydd1
      @ashakydd1 4 роки тому +24

      That is if the ocean is calm enough to land on where you are and your airliner is doing well enough to land.

    • @exoressdelivers70
      @exoressdelivers70 4 роки тому +4

      I have a fear of flying over the ocean to but agreed to fly only on Chalk's Airline seaplane that went from Ft. Lauderdale to Bimini. I reasoned that if the engines failed the plane could land on water. Just weeks before my scheduled flight one of their planes crashed into the ocean shortly after take off due to engine failure. All aboard were killed.

    • @vbscript2
      @vbscript2 4 роки тому +1

      Not me. Try landing one of these things on ocean swells. Not exactly easy, especially at the speeds that a turbojet or turboprop one would need to land. The engines back then were *far* less reliable than they are now. Since the dawn of the ETOPS era (i.e. the era in which we've flown across oceans in twin-engine aircraft,) I'm not aware of even a single incident of an airliner crashing or ditching into the ocean due to loss of power.

    • @tomberg9219
      @tomberg9219 4 роки тому

      I doubt that a flying boat's hull would've survived a landing in rough seas.

  • @afilleduptaco
    @afilleduptaco 4 роки тому +31

    The only channel I ever get excited when they upload

  • @fierfighter
    @fierfighter 4 роки тому +188

    Boeing 747: im the first double deck plane
    Saunders-Roe Princess: am i a joke to you?

    • @fierfighter
      @fierfighter 4 роки тому +2

      @Paul Ricchiuti oooooh thats true

    • @definitely_notme4112
      @definitely_notme4112 3 роки тому +11

      Airbus A380: im the first fully double deck plane
      Saunders-Roe Princess: am i joke to everyone?

    • @igameidoresearchtoo6511
      @igameidoresearchtoo6511 3 роки тому

      @@definitely_notme4112 apparently a joke to my dad XD

    • @maskedavenger2578
      @maskedavenger2578 3 роки тому

      Boeing made an earlier piston engine powered double deck airliner with sleeping berths .that both BOAC & Pan American Airlines used before the Comet & Boeing 707 on routes across the Atlantic in the 1950’s .I think it was called a Globemaster or similar name had four engines & 2 decks & was a conventional hard runway aircraft it might have even been designed during WW2 ready for peacetime .Large flying boats were well past their sell date buy the time that SRP monstrosity hit the sky .Howard Hughes spruce goose dwarfed the SRP flying boat anyway .

    • @CaseyJonesNumber1
      @CaseyJonesNumber1 3 роки тому +1

      @@maskedavenger2578 you're thinking of the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser. Its lower deck was very small and cramped, and on most airlines it was used as a bar, with seating room for only about six. The Douglas Globemaster was indeed a double-decker, but was used only for freight, and never went into passenger service.

  • @lordzadd
    @lordzadd 4 роки тому +59

    Yeeeessssss! You're back!

  • @yawteg
    @yawteg 4 роки тому +102

    TailSpin taught me about these as a kid in the 90's.

    • @brianhall4182
      @brianhall4182 4 роки тому +11

      Yup. Talespin made me love the concept of the flying boat. The PBY Catalina, Pan AM's Clipper service, flying to exotic locales in relative luxury, all during an era of rapidly evolving technology.

    • @trollking99
      @trollking99 4 роки тому +8

      The Sea Duck!

    • @RuskiWaffle
      @RuskiWaffle 4 роки тому

      Huh? I'm late to the party, can you guys explain?

  • @mikipav1064
    @mikipav1064 4 роки тому +229

    The more i hear about civil aviation history, the more i’m convinced that it’s just a sad tale of amazing aircrafts failing because of way to profit driven airlines. Everything fast or comfortable fails because of the “costs are to high” philosophy.

    • @hernerwerzog9700
      @hernerwerzog9700 4 роки тому +26

      Well, it isn't "profit driven"
      A failed investement, an unprofitable one, would surely end in bankruptcy of that company
      E.g. the the Princess would be an complete and utter failure and would create 0 profit.

    • @Rynewulf
      @Rynewulf 4 роки тому +13

      @@hernerwerzog9700 Even if it could have been helpful? Pushed nautical technology forward? Humanity is held back by profit driven metrics, especially considering the imaginary nature of fiat currency in the first place

    • @hernerwerzog9700
      @hernerwerzog9700 4 роки тому +4

      @@Rynewulf Even if it was helpful, it wouldn't be supported if it was too expensive
      We (sadly) live in a capitalistic society, where the profit of one is more important than the good of all

    • @Vlad-1986
      @Vlad-1986 4 роки тому +3

      anything cool, really. Aeroplanes are slowly getting lamer, slower and less safe.

    • @slojogojo2766
      @slojogojo2766 4 роки тому +3

      Nicht Sion Wagner People don't mass migrate to non socialist countries and no Western Europe "IS NOT" socialist !

  • @cowsine
    @cowsine 4 роки тому +293

    1:40 "A flying boat landed on Hudson river!"
    US Airways: **Noice idea!**

    • @kiwitrainguy
      @kiwitrainguy 3 роки тому +9

      It only had twelve engines.

    • @igameidoresearchtoo6511
      @igameidoresearchtoo6511 3 роки тому +2

      @@kiwitrainguy oh dont mind me just flying casually with 16 engines
      guess da plane

    • @Iugeer
      @Iugeer 3 роки тому

      @@igameidoresearchtoo6511 antanov mk-12.56

    • @Shootyshoot-ls3xj
      @Shootyshoot-ls3xj 3 роки тому

      @@igameidoresearchtoo6511 oh dont mind me just flying with 1 engine
      Guess the plane

    • @igameidoresearchtoo6511
      @igameidoresearchtoo6511 3 роки тому +1

      @@Shootyshoot-ls3xj too many aircraft with 1 engine

  • @KarlBunker
    @KarlBunker 4 роки тому +43

    You had me at "bar and lounge." Where can I buy tickets?
    And hey, good pitch for Curiosity Stream; I'ma click that link!

    • @Jehty_
      @Jehty_ 4 роки тому +2

      At Qatar Airways, Emirates, etc.

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 4 роки тому

      For about 10,000$ sure.

  • @zacharybarnes4110
    @zacharybarnes4110 4 роки тому +103

    Mustard: posts new video
    Me: AIRPLANES!!!!!!

  • @leroy1154
    @leroy1154 4 роки тому +95

    Where are the eccentric billionaires when you need them? It would be amazing to see someone build something like that last design and get it flying, if only for the novelty.

    • @meghanachauhan9380
      @meghanachauhan9380 4 роки тому +6

      They're gaying around with random dudes cuz 21st Century

    • @voidofspaceandtime4684
      @voidofspaceandtime4684 4 роки тому +3

      @@meghanachauhan9380 Epstein moment

    • @fisterB
      @fisterB 4 роки тому +9

      One of them is building a Space Ship factory in Texas for the conquest of the solar system now. Better than looking back but I agree that it is a pity we don't have a flying Princess still in flying condition or a replica.

    • @jayperry826
      @jayperry826 4 роки тому +1

      al dajjal shah e dunya had to use the word gay as a negative

    • @FalbertForester
      @FalbertForester 4 роки тому +4

      I've promised myself that should I land in the billion dollar net worth category, my first big purchase will be a new production Boeing Model 314. Boeing needs $$$, I need a flying boat, I'm sure we can come to an agreement.

  • @aj-2savage896
    @aj-2savage896 4 роки тому +1

    FANTASTIC CGI illustrating a FANTASTIC subject. You left out the Conroy conversion concept.

  • @indayteray8647
    @indayteray8647 4 роки тому +240

    Mustard: flying boat
    Me, an intellectual: *swimming plane*

    • @pim2377
      @pim2377 4 роки тому +5

      Why doesn’t have this comment more likes

    • @Nordic_Mechanic
      @Nordic_Mechanic 4 роки тому +4

      swimmin plane exist, its called a submarine doofus!

    • @str7523
      @str7523 4 роки тому +1

      Veikra but does it fly other then In the water

    • @tommipickalommi2689
      @tommipickalommi2689 4 роки тому

      @@pim2377 Because its not funny

  • @EndricksGame
    @EndricksGame 4 роки тому +98

    "Or even plane prejudice"
    Heh.

  • @b-chroniumproductions3177
    @b-chroniumproductions3177 4 роки тому +441

    "the war hadn't been fought with flying boats"
    The PBY-5 Catalina in both the Pacific and Atlantic theatres: am I joke to you?

    • @elanlynn5973
      @elanlynn5973 4 роки тому +13

      庄司 慎吾 - Shōji Shingo
      Meaningless arguments never get old.

    • @Tigershark_3082
      @Tigershark_3082 4 роки тому +11

      Darn good point there.

    • @jennifercheung6464
      @jennifercheung6464 4 роки тому +10

      Let’s get some double crash action going

    • @akindudeerada5840
      @akindudeerada5840 4 роки тому +24

      Y, even the short sunderland had its own share of victories in the second world war as a bomber. Also, if u are not mentioning the blom and Voss bv-238 then u gotta be kidding me! That thing was the largest flying boat to participate in ww2.

    • @erzhaider
      @erzhaider 4 роки тому +11

      @@akindudeerada5840 Although that only existed in extremely small numbers

  • @venugopalank.v2336
    @venugopalank.v2336 4 роки тому +6

    I loved the way how the music dropped at 4:45

    • @kleenexbox974
      @kleenexbox974 3 роки тому

      yeah, its kinda funny I feel like
      "what do you mean nobody wants these?"

  • @sirrliv
    @sirrliv 4 роки тому +82

    As much as I understand the economic practicality of it, it breaks my heart to see the grandeur and opulence of the past fallen to the wayside like this. These days we've forgotten what phrases like "Luxury Travel" really mean; it's not just some extra legroom and complementary "champagne", it's feeling like you're stepping into a flying palace, something to make your heart flutter rather than just shrug and think "Mm, not bad."
    That said, I have to wonder if there might be a niche market for ultra-luxury flying boats in today's high-end tourist market, a special means for the absurdly rich to be pampered on their way to grand resorts in the Bahamas, or South America, or the Javanese Islands. Heck, there are parts of New Zealand or Japan where commercial flying boat service might make legitimate fiscal sense on a more moderate scale.

    • @RainingDarkChocolate
      @RainingDarkChocolate 4 роки тому +5

      I too can see it being a thing in this era of luxury

    • @DrewLSsix
      @DrewLSsix 4 роки тому +6

      No, today flying in luxury is flying in an opulent private jet. Bypassing the crowds and even the various security screens to fly at your discretion pretty much when and wherever you like. You can have the entire cabin to your self for the ultimate in legroom or bring on wait staff and private chefs, a masseuse , bartender or whatever you could desire really.

    • @JohnJ469
      @JohnJ469 4 роки тому +14

      I've long hoped for the gas bags to come back. You can fly Australia to London in 24 hours, cramped into a tiny seat with average food or take 3 days, eating in a restaurant and sleeping in your cabin, sitting in the Observation lounge being served fresh coffee as you watch the world pass below. To quote Dr Eckener: "You do not travel in an airship, you voyage".

    • @rlh1689
      @rlh1689 4 роки тому +2

      How about affordable luxury like this one promised for the average person who can afford to pay a little more to travel like this? Why cater to the rich of today while the average person could enjoy this today.

    • @McLarenMercedes
      @McLarenMercedes 4 роки тому +1

      @@DrewLSsix How about those that are well-off economically and can afford luxury travel but not rich enough to afford their own private jet?? Do you live in a world of polarized extremes?? There are people rich enough to own their own private houses or apartments in different cities, yes, but most live in hotels during their visit. And while most of those live in affordable hotels there are also those well-off enough to be able to pay 4-5 times the regular tariff for a room so they go to luxury hotels.

  • @leejones5026
    @leejones5026 4 роки тому +32

    Aww, why do such beautiful things like this always die out? I always loved flying boats and wish their were still around as I would have liked to ride the Princess.

    • @leejones5026
      @leejones5026 4 роки тому

      To hell with that! I wanna travel in style! But you're right, that's why we can't have nice things like flying boats.

    • @oakoakoak2219
      @oakoakoak2219 4 роки тому +1

      @A Frustrated Gamer You'd be surprise how hard it is to make a profit by being an airlines. The fact that they treat us like cattle is because they have to. otherwise they would never make any revenue. So yeah you gotta understand that too

  • @investorbloke
    @investorbloke 4 роки тому +7

    Seaplanes were actually very important in WW2. They were utilised in various tasks from anti-submarine patrols to air-sea rescue and gunfire spotting for battleships. They sank submarines, recovered downed airmen and operated as scout aircraft over the vast distances of the Pacific and the Atlantic, as well as with UK coastal command.

  • @dominichoughton8119
    @dominichoughton8119 2 роки тому +12

    Someone else has probably already mentioned it, but you can see one of the Saunders-Roe flying boat jet fighters (the SR.A/1) at the Solent Sky Museum in Southampton, UK. They also have a Short Sandringham flying boat you can go inside and look around in.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 2 роки тому

      Visited last weekend. Excellent little museum.

  • @samovarmaker9673
    @samovarmaker9673 4 роки тому +83

    last time i was this early, the Saunders-Roe Princess was still flying

  • @nicocathelot1139
    @nicocathelot1139 4 роки тому +243

    Modern jet liner: who are you?
    Princess: I used to rule the world

  • @phiutubeful
    @phiutubeful 4 роки тому +64

    Does anyone else want one of those desk models he shows? Like, imagine those beautiful models sitting on your desk... oh wait... does he make those? IDK
    Yes, I know that they’re cgi, but if only we could 3D print them...

    • @flybobbie1449
      @flybobbie1449 4 роки тому +6

      There are companies that will custom make any aircraft model, they are in India and far east. Just look them up and reasonably priced.

    • @cdogg1787
      @cdogg1787 4 роки тому +6

      it's a 3D model. Mustard makes all the 3D models for his videos

    • @Fartsmucker1
      @Fartsmucker1 4 роки тому +3

      They are available, my very good pal George Dexter carved the prototype for the production run. He also built a 10 foot span PSS glider version which looked fantastic in the air.

    • @liu7
      @liu7 4 роки тому

      Mustard makes all the 3D models he showcases in his videos.

    • @DrWhom
      @DrWhom 4 роки тому

      @@liu7 It is really clever to present them as table-top models. As CGI, they are good but would not be convincing enough as part of a life-action movie (no disparagement, this is a one-guy outfit, and you probably know how many cgi people work on feature films). But as a table top model, they look like every boy's dream.

  • @jessewheinrichs
    @jessewheinrichs 3 роки тому +13

    Im convinced that a flying boat would be amazing. Like going on a cruise with more range and the luxury accommodations.

    • @AlbertaGeek
      @AlbertaGeek Рік тому +1

      Pretty naive of you to assume that in any given airplane regardless of size that the airline companies wouldn't still be cramming in as many seats as possible.

  • @aidang5409
    @aidang5409 4 роки тому +84

    Landing Gear: _Exists_
    Sauders-Roe: *I'm gonna stop you right there*

  • @ArpanD
    @ArpanD 4 роки тому +56

    So sad: "The Story Of The Princess That Never Ruled [the skies]" !!! Really they could at least keep 1 plane alive just fro show in museum, the design was awesome. Why did they sell the parts of ALL the planes? It really was a bold concept, so long back, despite being a commercial failure, I salute Saunders-Roe for their innovative gamble. Thanks for the video Mustard

    • @meghanachauhan9380
      @meghanachauhan9380 4 роки тому +1

      Cuz muneez

    • @tyrstone3539
      @tyrstone3539 4 роки тому

      Cuz muneez

    • @xanx3572
      @xanx3572 4 роки тому

      Cuz muneez

    • @Kaebuki
      @Kaebuki 4 роки тому

      Cuz muneez

    • @zodiotekgaming
      @zodiotekgaming 4 роки тому

      One reason being what he literally said clearly in the video. The airframes after being in long term storage corroded and rotten through, because salty water

  • @plushifoxed
    @plushifoxed 4 роки тому +144

    "a plane designed for a future that never existed"
    is this hauntology

    • @traptownkys1947
      @traptownkys1947 4 роки тому +4

      Sadalogy

    • @VCYT
      @VCYT 4 роки тому +4

      something like that line is the next democrat party slogan.

    • @DragonEXtwo
      @DragonEXtwo 4 роки тому +1

      That's what I was thinking.

    • @plushifoxed
      @plushifoxed 4 роки тому +2

      @@VCYT penus and balles

    • @chai6669
      @chai6669 4 роки тому

      Witchcraft

  • @TechMaster-ug4ft
    @TechMaster-ug4ft 4 роки тому +5

    I love the 3D animations and renders on this channel.

  • @mohammedbucheery4371
    @mohammedbucheery4371 4 роки тому +4

    I was literally reading about his plane and other flying boats over the past few days, and it’s such an awesome coincidence that you happen to make a video out of it! Thank you so much!

  • @ejtamayo5317
    @ejtamayo5317 4 роки тому +13

    Videos: Awsome
    Detail: Amazing
    Commentary: 999/10

  • @CyriacS
    @CyriacS 4 роки тому +8

    This channel is by far my favorite on youtube. Thank you for making such amazing videos!!

  • @makhenaten
    @makhenaten 3 роки тому +17

    Such a pity flying boats aren’t kept as a unique boutique travel option - nothing like them, and they, plus airships, truly excite me always✨🚀✨

  • @doughembree3299
    @doughembree3299 4 роки тому +8

    fantastic video! It's really cool seeing the ambitious history of flying boats beyond the H-4 Hercules, and it's always sad to see just how much potential was lost with these designs.
    I feel like the history of the SR.A/1 must be a pretty fascinating just on it's own, it's not every day that you saw someone try to develop a flying boat jet fighter.

  • @CuoreSportivo
    @CuoreSportivo 4 роки тому +4

    i'm not even mad this channel uploads so rarely, since when they do, they're spot on!

  • @hafidhrendyanto2690
    @hafidhrendyanto2690 4 роки тому +7

    That flying cruiser is a monster. I fell in love

    • @penkagenova7073
      @penkagenova7073 4 роки тому

      You mean cruise ship, a crusier is somewhat of a mix between a destroyers and a battleship

  • @sylak2112
    @sylak2112 2 роки тому +2

    Those jet seaplanes drawing have suhc a elegance to them. So sleek. It is a shame we don't at least have some of them around.

  • @SAMPLETEXT285
    @SAMPLETEXT285 3 роки тому +19

    Imagine what commercial Aviation would be like if aerospace designers and engineers had no restrictions and could build whatever they wanted
    We would truly be in a different world.

    • @Zawmbbeh
      @Zawmbbeh 2 роки тому

      interwar planes seem to fit this concept! lots of cool stuff was born there

    • @jscott1000
      @jscott1000 2 роки тому +1

      I'd start with flying aircraft carriers

    • @edwingeorge10
      @edwingeorge10 Рік тому +1

      I would go for nuclear fusion jets

  • @jeffreydevoti8528
    @jeffreydevoti8528 4 роки тому +8

    A movie with a flying boat theme, using it for exploration would be cool.

    • @CatalinaThePirate
      @CatalinaThePirate 3 роки тому +2

      😃 Jimmy Buffett (yes, the singer) wrote a book about a flying boat captain, called "Where is Joe Merchant?" - And it's in a rather Margaritaville-like setting in southern Florida, the Keys, and the Caribbean. Some nice flying boat scenes that ring true since Buffett once owned and flew one. I've always been disappointed no movie deal came of it. It was full of interesting and unusual characters... Would probably do better as a series... 😏

  • @seeingeyegod
    @seeingeyegod 4 роки тому +36

    "The comet brought in a new era of people experiencing explosive decompression and falling to their deaths from speeds not thus far attained"

    • @loicdeniel8361
      @loicdeniel8361 4 роки тому +3

      The princess had a pressurized hull lad.

    • @keithwaites9991
      @keithwaites9991 4 роки тому +2

      What ruined the Comet was - as yet unknown - metal fatigue. .no aircraft had flown higher or faster for so long ( jet fighters could only sustain high speeds for short periods )

  • @freddieallan3583
    @freddieallan3583 Рік тому +1

    Always loved flying boats ..love seeing them in old movies

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote7636 4 роки тому +15

    I remember the abandoned hulks sitting at Calshot Castle. By the way, over here we pronounce the two words 'flying boat' as if they were written 'flyingboat'.

    • @rfvxrfvx5278
      @rfvxrfvx5278 4 роки тому

      when do you remember last seeing them?

    • @williamfulgham2010
      @williamfulgham2010 4 роки тому

      I know, sometimes you Brits run words together like that and we can't even understand what you're saying over here in the states. I guess since you guys originated the language, you can do just about whatever the hell you want to do to the words, and get away with it.

    • @johnjephcote7636
      @johnjephcote7636 Рік тому

      I think, maybe 1958 or '59.@@rfvxrfvx5278

    • @johnjephcote7636
      @johnjephcote7636 Рік тому

      @@williamfulgham2010 Ha ha! It is just that 'flyingboat' is a compound noun, whereas 'flying (pause) boat' has only one noun (boat) and 'flying' is the adverb.The sense is different.

  • @williamschwan207
    @williamschwan207 4 роки тому +13

    6:47 missed a great opportunity to call it plane prejudice. This is why their flying boats never took off (pun intended)

  • @Liberator74
    @Liberator74 Рік тому +6

    We need modern flying boats! 💗

  • @ethanjones1521
    @ethanjones1521 4 роки тому +14

    I need the Saunders-roe ocean liner plane to be built! Can you imagine how awesome it would be to fly halfway around the world in sea plane like that! Holy crap!

    • @robertknowles2699
      @robertknowles2699 2 роки тому

      Can the weight be like an AL bicycle? It can be far safer for hikers, Darwin on the Trail minimalist ultra light folks, or people
      who like coast and safety of landing following river route. Hybrid decending
      windmill for acceleration later?

  • @tomasjakovac7950
    @tomasjakovac7950 4 роки тому +4

    This was all I needed for Valentine's Day :)

  • @georgobergfell
    @georgobergfell 4 роки тому +21

    1:32 This village is Hagnau, where I am from 😍

    • @leifvejby8023
      @leifvejby8023 4 роки тому

      I've almost been there - crossed the Bodensee from Konstanz when visiting the Stihl sawchain factory in schweiz

    • @Makuhesa
      @Makuhesa 4 роки тому +1

      @@hilbedd8138 wircklich,ehm sorry my inner naz~i mean german just came and possesd me....im from indonesia btw.....and...i only live 4 years in hamburg...beautiful citu tho

    • @philip9186
      @philip9186 4 роки тому +2

      Grüße aus Ravensburg :D

  • @danroberts9050
    @danroberts9050 4 роки тому +36

    Well, I'm wagering everything I've got that they come back. I just bought a ton of Saunders-Roe stock from a guy in a '72 Pontiac.

    • @meghanachauhan9380
      @meghanachauhan9380 4 роки тому +1

      I'll make those motherfuckers come back. Vertical flight ftw

    • @jrt818
      @jrt818 4 роки тому +4

      Check with a broker before you depose of stock from defunct companies. Sometimes they were absorbed by companies who are still around and might have considerable value.

    • @danroberts9050
      @danroberts9050 4 роки тому

      @@jrt818 I'll.... do that.

    • @jay999_
      @jay999_ 4 роки тому

      Hey that's the same guy who sold me these awesome speakers..
      But he had a white van though...

  • @juliegale3863
    @juliegale3863 2 роки тому +2

    Have write this - aged 17 I was in the Royal Observer Corp. able to get into the Farnborough Air Show free I saw both the Princess and the Brabazon flying. Later years holidaying near Cowes, IOW, I saw the Princesses mothballed in the hangers. At 87 I am still fascinated by aircraft and their history. Only managed to get on a Concord in a museum and it wasn't a passenger one, but an early test bed one filled with instuments. .

  • @Cby0530
    @Cby0530 4 роки тому +4

    6:03
    Saunders-Roe still remained committed to flying boats.
    That's what kills a company.

  • @clintelkins9630
    @clintelkins9630 3 роки тому +81

    "Landplanes can't land on water"
    Mustard: shows a water plane land on the Hudson
    Sulley: I can do that, easy

    • @brotheralaric7177
      @brotheralaric7177 3 роки тому +3

      mhh, i wouldnt say easy.

    • @trolly4233
      @trolly4233 3 роки тому +1

      It only landed for a few minutes though, before it sank into the “runway”

    • @uwetheiss970
      @uwetheiss970 3 роки тому

      @@trolly4233 Do you consider standing on a gate still as landing? He landed it. What happend after isnt part of the landing. You can land a land plane on water. But only once cause they cant swim.

    • @Salah.Ad-Din
      @Salah.Ad-Din 3 роки тому

      Oh my God, when will people shut up about sulley

  • @Booyaka9000
    @Booyaka9000 4 роки тому +21

    9:40 Instead of listening, everyone clicks on the Mig-25. XD

    • @donut5818
      @donut5818 4 роки тому +2

      I won’t lie, I did too.

  • @auroratherob0t
    @auroratherob0t 2 роки тому +1

    This is by far my favorite video made by him