@@thisherehandleIdospoutthe bow is from the unfinished uss Kentucky bb65 Wisconsin had a accident so with her new bow ahe.s 12 inch longer making her the longest us battleship
I'm big sad. Been waiting for it since the first video dropped and then a surprise emergency surgery took my gaming funds and now I get to sit at home, out of work, and watch content instead of play D': oh well. At least I'm not dead lol
@deekamikaze Don't worry, it's early access and not much you can do to get through a senario without lots of bugs and bad AI. Very promising, and cool how you can control the fleet assets and the devs are great so far.
Despite being my favourite included scenario you allude in this episode to one of the reasons it’s a little tricky - the straight between Naxos and Paros is too narrow for the SAG to fit through without micromanaging them. One of the super cool things with the game though is you can fix it! I’ll have an altered version up on the workshop of this mission that moves the SAG north so that it is headed between Mykonos and Naxos (along with some other changes which are probably spoilers for part 2 🤫)
Ngl i m watching your videos and i just cant stop(game itself, gameplay and the way you play are just interesting and i know that there is a bunch of people just saying that scenarios are unrealistic but if those were too realistic they would cry because video would be boring) , also thx for posting that big amount of Sea Power content.
It's pretty wild they reactived USS Wisconsin (and her sisters) in the 80s and fitted it with Harpoons and Tomahawks. Must have been quite a sight in a fleet with much more modern ships.
I highly appreciate how many missiles the US navy strapped onto the Iowas. Instead of eight harpoons, you get 16, and you also get plentiful supplies of Tomahawks. It makes the modern Iowa-class the best shore bombardment and long range ASuW vessel the US ever had.
I suspect that jam jam jam is the key to taking out the Soviet battle group. I'd also try having Harpoons coming in from multiple different directions. East and West from the Orion's and south from the fleet. Good hunting, Captain. 😊❤❤❤😊
I hope they add more coastal AShM batteries. WaPact allies were in possession of better launchers than the one ingame, such as the truck-based 4K15 Rubezh armed with the same missiles
The only thing not realistic about this scenario is the belief that the Russians can run away through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus without Turkish or Greek resistance.
They were equipped with helideck facilities and refueling capability but they didn't have hangars. As originally built they were designed to carry floatplanes on the stern but those would have been carried above deck or maybe dismantled in compartments below deck sometimes, not in a proper hangar.
Love the sea power Vids and also since The Hellenic navy mostly used US ships at the time it could be easily represented down the line as a nation or via mods
I can’t wait for some longevity in these scenarios. Something where all your units matter and decisions made matter. Refueling/rearming/resupplying will matter. Not the enemy is in front of your go find them. It’s the enemy is somewhere. Unknown what. Maybe don’t destroy maybe shadow them. But so I send all my hells out knowing they’ll need to refuel do I just dumb uncareingly all my sonobueys. Do I send out a 10 ship of interceptors and all my other carriers planes or should I save some. Cause now all the scenarios are being treated alittle same same.
I agree. There should be a few more limitations. I have tried running larger scenarios (40+ units) but the game doesn't handle that well and FPS drops.
I would turn the Whisky around close to gun range and save a Tomahawk! 16" rds are cheap compared to a RGM109!! and you have lots of em and only a few Tomahawks
It would be nice if they would model the entirety of a missile battery and not just the launcher. Looks like a fun scenario but where is the rest of the air group? There's obviously a carrier around, where's the E-2? I can handle leading with your SEAD but there should also be a flight of A-6s with Mavericks ready to go. And some F-14s on CAP. A carrier in a war situation would never be caught with its pants down.
I must say Stealth, even though you aren't the best at this game (no offence) I really appreciate how you're currently *only* producing Sea Power content! Really hyping everyone up.
"Carrier" Kiev? "Carrier Hunt"?? Comrade you must be mistaken! You must mean the heavy aircraft cruiser Kiev! She is clearly a cruiser! (Please don't apply the Montreux Convention to us, thanks!)
@Stealth17Gaming Don't mean to be a 'stick in the mud', but as others have alluded to... Pretty sure you just ordered WisKy to commit a war crime by shelling the city of Naxos. 😅😬🥴
I f you fire of a SEAD missile with their radar on ... that should be easy peazzy by theory [Edit: you answered the questions as I typed it. Bravo Zulu]
Hi (from Russia) I have a cuestion (вопрос) Can this game /or you start a "A consistent story campaign" That means, every turn in your missions will be affect on the global history of that mini world (carrier sunk or lost of island) will be means something. Sorry my English😊
This game looks amazing but I do have a question. Does anyone know if late Cold War (late ‘80’s/early ‘90’s) ships are in the game? In particular, the Arleigh Burke/Kongo/etc. is a noticeable omission from every preview video I’ve watched so far.
@stealth17 it seems too easy. I don’t understand why the Russian carrier doesn’t send its jets after your ships or use jammers or whatever they have to defend themselves and eliminate you just as you would with them. It seems that either it’s on easy difficulty or the AI in this game is not very smart
The Kiev has a handful of terrible jump jets with mediocre missiles. They're not really good for much outside of bullying patrol aircraft and helicopters, or attempting to engage incoming fighters. AA-8/K-60 is essentially an AIM-9B, R-60M is maybe -9D/E. Kh-23/AS-7 is a lot like Bullpup, short ranged and requiring the pilot to guide the missile in.
Hi, really like the game and your style to comment during gaming. But please learn more about the game mechanics, and let your recon planes radar on, else we do not see much of what is happening...
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
"Temper, temper!"
Good to see Whiskey still has her short temper even in game 🤣🤣
...'WisKy'
=P
@@thisherehandleIdospoutthe bow is from the unfinished uss Kentucky bb65 Wisconsin had a accident so with her new bow ahe.s 12 inch longer making her the longest us battleship
I've been on holiday to Naxos. Lovely little island. Stayed almost exactly where you dropped a salvo of 16" HE so, um, thanks for that.
🤣😂😅😅😅😬
"Now it's gone", yeah, and town around them as well
😅😅😅😬💩
only five days until can get my hands on this game! you do amazing gameplay videos.
😱
Six for me cant wait.
Yeah mate only 5 days to wait
I'm big sad. Been waiting for it since the first video dropped and then a surprise emergency surgery took my gaming funds and now I get to sit at home, out of work, and watch content instead of play D': oh well. At least I'm not dead lol
@deekamikaze Don't worry, it's early access and not much you can do to get through a senario without lots of bugs and bad AI.
Very promising, and cool how you can control the fleet assets and the devs are great so far.
Despite being my favourite included scenario you allude in this episode to one of the reasons it’s a little tricky - the straight between Naxos and Paros is too narrow for the SAG to fit through without micromanaging them. One of the super cool things with the game though is you can fix it! I’ll have an altered version up on the workshop of this mission that moves the SAG north so that it is headed between Mykonos and Naxos (along with some other changes which are probably spoilers for part 2 🤫)
"Temper, Temper" @11:11
I understood that reference!
Ngl i m watching your videos and i just cant stop(game itself, gameplay and the way you play are just interesting and i know that there is a bunch of people just saying that scenarios are unrealistic but if those were too realistic they would cry because video would be boring) , also thx for posting that big amount of Sea Power content.
Yeah realistic scenarios is ships never meeting. Glad you're enjoying my less than realistic scenarios :)
It's pretty wild they reactived USS Wisconsin (and her sisters) in the 80s and fitted it with Harpoons and Tomahawks. Must have been quite a sight in a fleet with much more modern ships.
yeah seriously, they look so good too 😍
I visited the Wisconsin and mighty mo
I highly appreciate how many missiles the US navy strapped onto the Iowas. Instead of eight harpoons, you get 16, and you also get plentiful supplies of Tomahawks. It makes the modern Iowa-class the best shore bombardment and long range ASuW vessel the US ever had.
I am very simple man, i see battleship, i click!! Nice content as always though. Keep up!!
How come it's not "Operation Dire Straits"? Infinitely better
Missiles for nothing and the torps for free!😂😂😂😂
@@ewok40klmao
I suspect that jam jam jam is the key to taking out the Soviet battle group. I'd also try having Harpoons coming in from multiple different directions. East and West from the Orion's and south from the fleet. Good hunting, Captain. 😊❤❤❤😊
Flying trees... these are definitely the new Russian stealth helicopters 😆
Thank you for getting me my fix of sea power until the release.
It is a tad ridiculous that a 16" shell landing within 50m of an AA battery doesn't reduce it to dust
I hope they add more coastal AShM batteries. WaPact allies were in possession of better launchers than the one ingame, such as the truck-based 4K15 Rubezh armed with the same missiles
Very much enjoying your Sea Power videos, they are much appreciated.
Thanks!
Vaq 133 in game as EA 6B aircraft my squadron when I was in the US Navy
9:50 Wisconsin must be thinking "I thought they learned last time not to do this to me?"
In 19
85, Only the New Jersey and Iowa were in commission. Wisconsin came in 1988. Just a nit-pick.
The only thing not realistic about this scenario is the belief that the Russians can run away through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus without Turkish or Greek resistance.
Well that and the fact that the Soviets were somehow able to install missile batteries on islands owned by Greece (you know a NATO member).
that too.
Just under a week until early launch, although they missed an opportunity to launch the game on Veteran’s day here in the states…
0:25 Wait what? What are Soviet anti-ship missiles doing on Greek Islands?
The soviets occupy Greece and turkey in the scenario
Always good to see a Kidd-class. 👌👍
Oh, well, everybody’s heard about the Byrd,
B-B-B-Byrd, Byrd, Byrd, the Byrd is the word!
😆😆😊
Temper Temper
Love that reference 👍
Didn't the Iowa-class had her own supplement of helicopters? I think I remember from Harpoon that they had 4 helos...
They were equipped with helideck facilities and refueling capability but they didn't have hangars. As originally built they were designed to carry floatplanes on the stern but those would have been carried above deck or maybe dismantled in compartments below deck sometimes, not in a proper hangar.
@@taiko1237 Yes, now I remember, thank you! I confused it with the hangars of the Kirov-class....
A Couple of MD 500s faking it as Little Birds (they currently exist in game).
OP Praying Mantis V.2.
Love the sea power Vids and also since The Hellenic navy mostly used US ships at the time it could be easily represented down the line as a nation or via mods
Your name sounds greek
@BiggestAnimanFan9 It is,I am
In reality, I do believe each turret on an iowa class can target independently.
Was Wisconsin in range of the Silkworms with her 5inch guns as well as the 16inch guns?
you could use SM-1/2s for the silkworm launchers
What’s the reference in “Temper, temper”? The only thing I can think of is The Lion King.
0:40: "and yet, we cannot be too careless..." Wait wut?
That is what I usually catch fishing: Floating Trees (facepalm)
I can’t wait for some longevity in these scenarios. Something where all your units matter and decisions made matter. Refueling/rearming/resupplying will matter. Not the enemy is in front of your go find them. It’s the enemy is somewhere. Unknown what. Maybe don’t destroy maybe shadow them. But so I send all my hells out knowing they’ll need to refuel do I just dumb uncareingly all my sonobueys. Do I send out a 10 ship of interceptors and all my other carriers planes or should I save some. Cause now all the scenarios are being treated alittle same same.
I agree. There should be a few more limitations.
I have tried running larger scenarios (40+ units) but the game doesn't handle that well and FPS drops.
2 questions. 1 where's the tug for the Soviet carrier? and 2. have you heard the legend of temper temper about the Wisconsin?
He literally joked about it
04:50 - Harpooning So Evil
(if you know, you know)
I would turn the Whisky around close to gun range and save a Tomahawk! 16" rds are cheap compared to a RGM109!! and you have lots of em and only a few Tomahawks
Will it be possible to change these scenarios. Love to play this one myself for sure, but would swap some few units.
Certainly
It would be nice if they would model the entirety of a missile battery and not just the launcher. Looks like a fun scenario but where is the rest of the air group? There's obviously a carrier around, where's the E-2? I can handle leading with your SEAD but there should also be a flight of A-6s with Mavericks ready to go. And some F-14s on CAP. A carrier in a war situation would never be caught with its pants down.
11:35: Think more along the lines of a Cessna 172
Brother I crave the forbidden radar signatures, 5 days to release!
What is crazy is I kept trying to change the visual with my mouse... and realized it was a video not the actual game (facepalm)
I must say Stealth, even though you aren't the best at this game (no offence) I really appreciate how you're currently *only* producing Sea Power content! Really hyping everyone up.
Thank you
"Carrier" Kiev? "Carrier Hunt"?? Comrade you must be mistaken! You must mean the heavy aircraft cruiser Kiev! She is clearly a cruiser! (Please don't apply the Montreux Convention to us, thanks!)
@Stealth17Gaming
Don't mean to be a 'stick in the mud', but as others have alluded to... Pretty sure you just ordered WisKy to commit a war crime by shelling the city of Naxos.
😅😬🥴
I f you fire of a SEAD missile with their radar on ... that should be easy peazzy by theory [Edit: you answered the questions as I typed it. Bravo Zulu]
A7 's should have sidewinders to
Do nato have anti-ship batteries?
Harpoon (Denmark) given to Ukraine 22 conflict.
@ was speaking about the video game not the Ukraine conflict.
Please stay on topic.
@@SWBB1000 Dude I was stating the info for tthe system. Not shilling for Ukraine pull your head in🖕
Why isn't the Kiev launching YaKs? The US aircraft are all attack and patrol planes and would be vulnerable to even the craptacular Forgers.
The AI doesn't know how to launch aircraft from carriers and airbases at the moment
@@Stealth17Gaming Well, that's sub-optimal
@@phluphie Certainly
Hi (from Russia)
I have a cuestion (вопрос)
Can this game /or you start a
"A consistent story campaign"
That means, every turn in your missions will be affect on the global history of that mini world (carrier sunk or lost of island) will be means something.
Sorry my English😊
Not yet. They're expecting the campaign for q2 2025
@@Stealth17Gaming okay
Thanks for answer
The funny thing is... i kept trying to rotate and interact with the screed (facepalm)
Seen your videos it's mainly all American military equipment:why didn't you include other Nato alliance equipment
Because there aren't many other NATO units in the game right now
24hrs left!
My battleship didn't survive on the first anti ship mission, miss 2 and battle ship dead😂😂😂😂
This game looks amazing but I do have a question. Does anyone know if late Cold War (late ‘80’s/early ‘90’s) ships are in the game? In particular, the Arleigh Burke/Kongo/etc. is a noticeable omission from every preview video I’ve watched so far.
No they're not part of the game
@ DLC at some point, I suppose. Thanks for the info!
Aw what, its not the new jersey? Now im sad
Named after Rear ADM Isaac C Kidd who died at Pearl Harbour on his command USS Arizona BB-39.
Sorry wrong person
@stealth17 it seems too easy. I don’t understand why the Russian carrier doesn’t send its jets after your ships or use jammers or whatever they have to defend themselves and eliminate you just as you would with them. It seems that either it’s on easy difficulty or the AI in this game is not very smart
The AI doesn't know how to launch aircraft from carriers and airbases. It severely limits the scenarios at this point
The Kiev has a handful of terrible jump jets with mediocre missiles. They're not really good for much outside of bullying patrol aircraft and helicopters, or attempting to engage incoming fighters. AA-8/K-60 is essentially an AIM-9B, R-60M is maybe -9D/E. Kh-23/AS-7 is a lot like Bullpup, short ranged and requiring the pilot to guide the missile in.
@ ah brutal. I suppose they are working on it? Thanks for getting back to me! Appreciate it
@@jay18fan Yeah they have to be. Can't have such a critical part of the game not working
people forget that the A7 also carries a pair of AIM9(probly L models in 85') and has a 20mm M61 Vulcan and is far better than the Yak...
"Kid destroyer"
Named after Rear ADM Isaac C Kidd who died at Pearl Harbour on his command USS Arizona BB-39.
Hi, really like the game and your style to comment during gaming. But please learn more about the game mechanics, and let your recon planes radar on, else we do not see much of what is happening...
Radars on means revealing yourself, so you can’t use them all the time
Pausing is CHEATING!!!
Nonsense
Please, surface-to-air missiles or SAMs, not "interceptors".
Ok
womp