In 1960 I was in the Air Force and stationed in Northern Japan. I bought a brand new Omega Seamaster on a steel bracelet for $36.00. Some years ago I thought I'd be a nice father and give it to my son. Unfortunately he got divorced and in the mess of that the watch was lost. I cringe everytime I hear the Omega name. That watch was very plain, black face no complications. I've gone on line to try to find a comparable older Seamaster but no luck.
'Cheap' is certainly subjective, horologically speaking. These are all out of my price range, but a vicarous pleasure when I catch your reviews. Thank you so very much for sharing this with us all. I'll just have to stick with my Glycine and Citizen models for now. Take care, brother.
Nice but now with the in house chronometer movement you are gonna pay close to $1000 for a service and that price will only keep increasing over the years . That’s a lot of money in the lifetime of the watch , without counting of course the purchase price . For myself , I’m better off getting a Luminox and a Seiko diver , and putting the extra money into a pension fund or into dividend shares that accumulate over time . These Swiss premium, “ luxury” watches have gotten way too expensive for what you get .
I'm a omega seamaster 300M owner, although, mine is from 2009, and I'm still in love with the watch, being a older guy, I have to ask why do so many UA-camrs feel that they have to spin the bezel so much, of course if you're going to use it as a fidget spinner, then the tiny parts in the bezel are going to wear down, creating backlash and loose play, my 09 is still like it was when it was new....if you feel the need to fidget with something, buy a spinner 😅😅🤦🤦
Thanks for the review! Yeah, I was able to get a new BB58 and a Planet Ocean (both new, grey market) for less than a Submariner at retail. No waiting lists, no games. Just nice watches.
I got the 75th anniversary edition on rubber with the added clasp vs. the standard buckle, and I really love it. I am a big fan of Omega, with this being my 4th one. But you are right, this color and LE pushed me over the edge to get it. And within the first 24 hours, I had several comments on it. I was in Vegas, and store employees at AP and Patek and IWC all asked about it.
Interesting that you mentioned the bezel being a little loose when new. Mine was a little overly tight when new. Mine is a 2024 so I’m curious if it’s an issue that was fixed, OR if it’s kind of a luck of the draw issue.
Actual divers use dive computers and have being doing so for the past 25+ years. All "dive watches" are toys and only worn for decoration these days. They're jewelry with moving parts so men can pretend these things aren't just jewelry.
I just picked up this one in Las Vegas Omega boutique at the Wynn. I’m still in the honeymoon phase and constantly get compliments. It’s just different enough to stand out compared to the standard models. This is my largest watch at 42mm, but it still wears solid and not too oversized on my 6.5in wrist size!
I own a vintage SMP with electric blue dial and just acquired my 124060, both have their purpose but the Omega has my heart because it was my first luxury watch gift and has been to every beach 🏝️ on the planet!!!
The case is too big. No taper on the bracelet. Bezel sounds and feels like a $100 watch. Not Rolex level, but a better value for sure. Not a fan of these anniversary edition colorways, either. I'm exhausted with fume dials. I really wanted to get a Seamaster over my now acquired BB54, but it's just too big. Tried one on at the AD. Hopefully Tudor and other brands inspire Omega to release a midsize seamaster. Hell, even a 40mm option would be great. The PO exists at 39, but too thick.
I have the omega seamaster 300m master chronometer gray dial and I love it. Bit I want to get that 75th edition, it’s a beauty! I was seriously considering saving up for. Rolex black submariner with date window but I think omega is more appealing to me.
I really respected my Father-in-law. Very understated. When he wasn't in scrubs in the operating room he wore simple Brooks Brothers. Drove a pickup truck. in the 60s when Omega and Rolex were both around $300, he bought an Omega. It was always quality over prestige. After fifty years, when he thought the Omega got too expensive to maintain, he bought a Timex. After he died recently I mentioned this to my wife. What did she do, bought me an Omega. Not only that, she found a mint 007 40th. I don't even dive, nor do 99.9% of those with a seamaster.
I love a great Bezel myself. But i do dive for work. You really dont know the Bezel action until you are at some sort of depth. Im old-school, and i still dive with a watch as well as a computer. A loose Bezel on the surface can be perfect at depth. And vice versa. Anyway, I love this watch. Great video
Great review. My wife surprised me Xmas morning with this SMP300 summer blue on bracelet, I already have the smp300 white dial and love it. I’ve a sea dweller 4000 34 yrs old and Tudor Submariner 34 yr old all recently serviced. I love them but, I’m definitely an omega man keep up the great content
Check out the Guanqin submariner homage. It’s 50 bucks right now and is an awesome watch…plus it says “since 8500” on the dial…which is just fantastically funny.
This Diver 300m summer bleu 75e is really beautifull and I gonna buy it. 7000e is not cheap Sir! The 8800 mvt is more precise than my date just 41. And I think this Omega is à good value.. take care of it..❤
I've been watching your dive watch videos, I'd be interested to see your opinion on a Ulysse Nardin dive watch (potentially qualifying as cheap since they lose a lot of value on the secondary market). The UN maxi marine chronometers are an interesting alternative to the Omegas and Rolex you reviewed. But I particularly like the acqua perpetual line since it combines a dive watch with a perpetual calendar. I recently acquired a UN 333-77-7 which I am biased to think is the coolest of the bunch.
Have omega diver chronograph and rolex sd 43. Very comparable in looks and quality. The rolex feels a tad more elegant and i do love the cyclops. The rolex bracelet however is overrated the braceler js too tapered and too thin for a larger watch. The omega is significantly larger in every dimension and feels more solid and rugged. Id say equal even though the rolex was 5k more. The omega diver chronograph doesnt maintain value at all however if that matters. Wont sell either.
On my way up the watch mountain I admired my friends Omega seamaster. Once I bought my gmt master and sea dweller, i never looked back. I admire their history, but believe they are too busy in design.
The new OSMP300 is a stunner, the blue is bang a on beauty, beast of a movement and a home run in the dive watch category. I’ve owned 2265.80 with the electric ⚡️ blue wave 🌊 dial over 20 years and it is a workhorse!
Not on the market for either, but to my eyes the regular Rolex Sub is by far the classier, more timeless design. So what if you can get 2 Omegas , or 3 Tudors, or 5 Longines etc.. Simply looks wise - Baltic Aquascaphe is cooler than both ;)
went down the mall and tried the seamaster on then tried on the breitling superocean 46 mm A17378E71C1A1 and much preferred to the omega , i think the omega rubber strap is kinda shiny and feels a bit cheap and no deployment clasp at that price ? the rubber strap on my oris aquis is better than omega .. in the end bought the breitling , not in the mall though , in the uk the omega seameaster is £5600 on metal strap and the super ocean is £4300 , managed to find an as new 4 month old 46 mm super ocean for £2800 thats on the metal strap and guess what , when i got it is a brand new with all paperwork and the first owner had extended the warranty from 2 years to 4 , and guess what else was in the box ? the breitling blue rubber strap with deployment clasp .... i like not having the date on the watch as never use them anyway ... should hold its money at that price and in time maybe increase ...
A.I. auto-CAD, CNC produced, with an arbitrarily "Limited Edition". The algorithm will soon offer limited edition leap year, then Haley's comet, then Limited edition because it's Tuesday etc. Rage against the machine.
It's by far less comfortable than a Submariner. Watch is fine, but it's about time they redesign the bracelet, it needs taper and some chamfers at least on the underside. Plus a smaller clasp. Luckily Rolex already provides this since 2009.
Very good comparison review thank you Randy. I am fortunate enough to have a white dial 300m but every time Omega bring out another colourway or variant I would generally like to own it. I also agree that the strap changing offers the opportunity to reinvent or freshen up the look. Omega have NATO options as well, I would however just highlight the cost of the mesh which is off the scale at £750. I have a GMT which rarely gets worn as the value has increased considerably and stupidly since I bought it so I'm kinda frightend to wear it, not an issue with the Omega. I think either will serve you well depending on which camp you fall into but I don't see the Rolex being worth double the Omega in my humble opinion.
damn.. im amazed how luxury watches are so much cheaper in the US compared to Europe with the US having much higher salary than in Europe 😂 the bond omega costs 11k €.. here, which is about 12k$ .. the new diver 300 ocean blue is 9000€ which is hozt 9,5K $ or somethin like that.. and the rolex sub cause its not available, costs in the grey market bout 30-40k€ which is i guess 33-45k $
I had a look yesterday and it’s now gone up another £100!!! Meaning that it’s been raised 3x (from £6600 to £6900 to £7500 to £7600) all in the space of a year…mind blowing!
I mean I get it. Pound for pound the Omega is good deal on paper... But it is not a Submariner, it does not have the brutalist design that is preserved from the days of the Cold War, it is too shiny, it has AR coating on top of the crystal (abysmal and annoying) and the bracelet and clasp are.. ok-ish. Hence why I own the no date Sub and not the SMP. Yes, Rolex are autists and their AD's can suck it, but I got the only model I love, so I could care less.
After watching your review of the James Cameron Deepsea, I got a 126660 model and love it. I have the Seamaster 300 summer blue and my AD just got a Seamaster 300M summer blue in used. I just put that one on layaway.
Can’t sell a video these days without mentioning Rolex. I really don’t think Omega is beating Rolex at anything tbh. Chunky ugly, nasty bracelet and clasp undesirable next to the Submariner. Glad that Rolex being unavailable has pushed some people to buy Omega, but Tudor is coming for that pie soon.
Rolex: We got DeepSea, a well known true dive instrument. Omega: “Presenting an Easter egg on Ultra Deep(Omega was here)”.Sorry we didn’t catch that, would you say it again.
Everyone swings at the king, Rolex but I forsee their reign lasting another generation. Rolex isnt even a watch in my opinion, its an investment. Tudor is the watch a smart consumer buys when they want to daily a Rolex. Omega has the James Bond providence which is big with yhe boomer generation. But how many Speedmasters can they make and recreate? Theyre putting them on swatches now. Do you see Rolex ever pulling that stunt? You dont have to be a forum junky either to start putting together the pieces about their reliability and service costs, they all will tell you just pay AD price because you will need the warranty.
Don’t hate, it’s a great design add on, purposeful and unique, only reason other luxury brands don’t have one is because they know it’s an instant rip off
😂 are you for real? Don’t even compare Omega to Rolex, such young companies like Rolex don’t belong in the same sentence, especially when they are overhyped, over priced and unavailability unless you kiss peoples asses Rolex has become a joke not prestigious
Omega was effectively reinvigorated by a jcbiver who started the frankenbrand, threw swatch money at everything and everyone until something sticks. Rolex did none of that shit, they have consistently built their brand based on quality and status. The only time omega truly had a leg up was on their milled clasps- rolex responded with the glide lock. The best in the industry past 14 years.
Different taste, I wont change one Sub for 10 horrible Seamasters! That absurd hands and general design of the Seamaster, it looks like a toy, that ridiculous valve at 10 that nobody needs, and the finishing on the Rolex is spectacular and timeless.
Of course you wouldn’t, it would be impossible to get two Seamasters for the price of a Sub, let alone ten! 🤣🤣🤣 Clown. So do tell us what is so great about the most copied watch in the world of horology. And I want details about the actual Submariner, not the crappy Orient you own.
To Me These Omega's Are Ugly ! The Price Range Makes A Difference To Compare These To A James Cameron Makes No Sense A 6 Thousand - A 20 Thousand Dollar Watch This Is Funny. The Rolex Will Increase In Value And The Omega Will Not !
just because rolex is more popular doesent mean its the best, it does brainwash ppl alot like apple products but nahh theres better choices out there. am a omega fan also vacherron constantinand JLC but never again rolex there so outdated and ugly looking
There is no comparison to a Deep Sea James Cameron. Rolex is -2/+2 seconds per day vs Omega -4 / +6 seconds per day. The crown screw down on the Omega is not as refined as well as the the bezel click. Rolex smokes an Omega 300M
You have it the wrong way around. Omega is 0 /+5 sec a day (METAS) and Rolex is -4 /+6 sec a day (COSC). Rolex then claims -2/+2 sec a day ( Superlative). The problem with superlative is 1. It's not independently verified 2. It's not transparent on what happens during the test. And 3. What they do tell us is it's tested on a watch winder. The watch winder is an issue because a watches accuracy over 24 hrs is to give the variance over 24 hrs of mainspring depletion because the mainspring cannot deliver torque with any consistency. So COSC and METAS tests are done to ensure the automatic rotor does not replenish mainspring power. Superlative test is done to ensure the rotor DOES replenish mainspring power.
I'm still saving for my omega, i keep getting close but something happens where i have to spend some. This time it was 2 new tyres, two front shocks and the M.O.T. so that was a quick £500 from my watch savings. I will get there soon. Cheers Randy.
In 1960 I was in the Air Force and stationed in Northern Japan. I bought a brand new Omega Seamaster on a steel bracelet for $36.00. Some years ago I thought I'd be a nice father and give it to my son. Unfortunately he got divorced and in the mess of that the watch was lost. I cringe everytime I hear the Omega name. That watch was very plain, black face no complications. I've gone on line to try to find a comparable older Seamaster but no luck.
that is a heart breaking story, man. I hat that
💔
'Cheap' is certainly subjective, horologically speaking. These are all out of my price range, but a vicarous pleasure when I catch your reviews. Thank you so very much for sharing this with us all. I'll just have to stick with my Glycine and Citizen models for now. Take care, brother.
Simon you will get there one day. You gotta make it happen.
@muffemod Thanks, mate. Omega and Rolex will just remain pipedreams unless my ticket gets picked. 😂
Nice but now with the in house chronometer movement you are gonna pay close to $1000 for a service and that price will only keep increasing over the years . That’s a lot of money in the lifetime of the watch , without counting of course the purchase price . For myself , I’m better off getting a Luminox and a Seiko diver , and putting the extra money into a pension fund or into dividend shares that accumulate over time . These Swiss premium, “ luxury” watches have gotten way too expensive for what you get .
I'm a omega seamaster 300M owner, although, mine is from 2009, and I'm still in love with the watch, being a older guy, I have to ask why do so many UA-camrs feel that they have to spin the bezel so much, of course if you're going to use it as a fidget spinner, then the tiny parts in the bezel are going to wear down, creating backlash and loose play, my 09 is still like it was when it was new....if you feel the need to fidget with something, buy a spinner 😅😅🤦🤦
I agree and you sir make a great point 😂😂😂. These utubers no nothing 😂😂😂😂 Enjoy your SEAMASTER 😊
Hey how often do you spin the bezel maybe once a day.or twice?
Thanks for the review! Yeah, I was able to get a new BB58 and a Planet Ocean (both new, grey market) for less than a Submariner at retail. No waiting lists, no games. Just nice watches.
Tudor is a fake Rolex 😂😂😂
I got the 75th anniversary edition on rubber with the added clasp vs. the standard buckle, and I really love it. I am a big fan of Omega, with this being my 4th one. But you are right, this color and LE pushed me over the edge to get it. And within the first 24 hours, I had several comments on it. I was in Vegas, and store employees at AP and Patek and IWC all asked about it.
Hi, what about the AR coating, is it noticeable when it get scratched and is it possible to polish it off? Thanks!
This is definitely going to start a riot on WatchCrunch 🤣🤣
Interesting that you mentioned the bezel being a little loose when new. Mine was a little overly tight when new. Mine is a 2024 so I’m curious if it’s an issue that was fixed, OR if it’s kind of a luck of the draw issue.
As a diver all these are toys in the omega line. a real mans diver is the PloProf. Review that bad boy!!!!
Actual divers use dive computers and have being doing so for the past 25+ years. All "dive watches" are toys and only worn for decoration these days. They're jewelry with moving parts so men can pretend these things aren't just jewelry.
The mesh strap in my opinion. Is lighter and better to wear that heavy obstructing one in summer especially.
I rarely touch the bezel on mine.. no real need too lol.
The Seamaster in summer blue is my new grail..
I just picked up this one in Las Vegas Omega boutique at the Wynn. I’m still in the honeymoon phase and constantly get compliments. It’s just different enough to stand out compared to the standard models. This is my largest watch at 42mm, but it still wears solid and not too oversized on my 6.5in wrist size!
Tuned in for Cheap Watches
He flexes with a Cameron Deep Sea Dweller!
Great channel!
“Better” is a stretch. Nice watch for sure, but I wouldn’t trade a Sub for one.
I have both and the smp is so much more fun to look at and keeps better time
@grahamemwl Oddly I have both the Sub and SMP as well, and the SMP has not been worn in two years.
I own a vintage SMP with electric blue dial and just acquired my 124060, both have their purpose but the Omega has my heart because it was my first luxury watch gift and has been to every beach 🏝️ on the planet!!!
The case is too big. No taper on the bracelet. Bezel sounds and feels like a $100 watch. Not Rolex level, but a better value for sure. Not a fan of these anniversary edition colorways, either. I'm exhausted with fume dials. I really wanted to get a Seamaster over my now acquired BB54, but it's just too big. Tried one on at the AD. Hopefully Tudor and other brands inspire Omega to release a midsize seamaster. Hell, even a 40mm option would be great. The PO exists at 39, but too thick.
I have the omega seamaster 300m master chronometer gray dial and I love it. Bit I want to get that 75th edition, it’s a beauty! I was seriously considering saving up for. Rolex black submariner with date window but I think omega is more appealing to me.
I think the blue watch would look great with the mesh. Talk about tropical fun. Great review!
I went rubber strap on mine as well. The bracelet will be installed next week.
Nice watch. Not cheep. It's like....10 wrist dive computers. Beat NAVY!
I really respected my Father-in-law. Very understated. When he wasn't in scrubs in the operating room he wore simple Brooks Brothers. Drove a pickup truck. in the 60s when Omega and Rolex were both around $300, he bought an Omega. It was always quality over prestige. After fifty years, when he thought the Omega got too expensive to maintain, he bought a Timex.
After he died recently I mentioned this to my wife. What did she do, bought me an Omega. Not only that, she found a mint 007 40th. I don't even dive, nor do 99.9% of those with a seamaster.
I love a great Bezel myself. But i do dive for work. You really dont know the Bezel action until you are at some sort of depth. Im old-school, and i still dive with a watch as well as a computer. A loose Bezel on the surface can be perfect at depth. And vice versa. Anyway, I love this watch. Great video
Great review.
My wife surprised me Xmas morning with this SMP300 summer blue on bracelet, I already have the smp300 white dial and love it. I’ve a sea dweller 4000 34 yrs old and Tudor Submariner 34 yr old all recently serviced. I love them but, I’m definitely an omega man keep up the great content
Check out the Guanqin submariner homage. It’s 50 bucks right now and is an awesome watch…plus it says “since 8500” on the dial…which is just fantastically funny.
Thanks for the video.
Would like to hear your view on “if you could only have one Omega” what would you choose and why?
Dude what?! Randy does watches too?! How did I miss this. I trust every word this man says about HiFi audio. Didn't know he was a watch guy too.
I got a 300 heritage in dark blue a great wtach
Nobody think it is fake or not for Omega. 😊 Except bracelet I am totally agree Omega better than Sub.
This Diver 300m summer bleu 75e is really beautifull and I gonna buy it. 7000e is not cheap Sir! The 8800 mvt is more precise than my date just 41. And I think this Omega is à good value.. take care of it..❤
I will check out the Omega, once it’s available at 40% discount on the Grey. 🐠🐠🐠
I've been watching your dive watch videos, I'd be interested to see your opinion on a Ulysse Nardin dive watch (potentially qualifying as cheap since they lose a lot of value on the secondary market). The UN maxi marine chronometers are an interesting alternative to the Omegas and Rolex you reviewed. But I particularly like the acqua perpetual line since it combines a dive watch with a perpetual calendar. I recently acquired a UN 333-77-7 which I am biased to think is the coolest of the bunch.
I like the wavy dial, and that the bracelet doesn't taper. Not a big fan of the rest of what the 300M brings to the table.
Compare the Omega to a Seiko SLA model…tell me what ya think. Good video man. Thx….
I would love to. they look incredible
Omega SMP 300 P Looks good on you sir!!
The escape valve just looks ridiculous.
Tudor fanboy spotted 😂😂😂😂😂😂
It’s unique, it’s distinctive and it’s an HEV so it’s got usefulness
Where is the cheap watch man?
Have omega diver chronograph and rolex sd 43. Very comparable in looks and quality. The rolex feels a tad more elegant and i do love the cyclops. The rolex bracelet however is overrated the braceler js too tapered and too thin for a larger watch. The omega is significantly larger in every dimension and feels more solid and rugged. Id say equal even though the rolex was 5k more. The omega diver chronograph doesnt maintain value at all however if that matters. Wont sell either.
On my way up the watch mountain I admired my friends Omega seamaster. Once I bought my gmt master and sea dweller, i never looked back. I admire their history, but believe they are too busy in design.
Started with omega diver chronograph and then added sd 43 6 months later. Equal to me. The omegs feels higher quality but love them both
Do you know what kind of speaker wire i could buy for 8500..?
The new OSMP300 is a stunner, the blue is bang a on beauty, beast of a movement and a home run in the dive watch category. I’ve owned 2265.80 with the electric ⚡️ blue wave 🌊 dial over 20 years and it is a workhorse!
Any weight difference on the OEM Mesh bracelet vs the OEM Seamaster bracelet?
Considered ordering the mesh, since the original bracelet is quite heavy
Anecdotally, the mesh is lighter. I haven’t actually compared them on a scale though
Not on the market for either, but to my eyes the regular Rolex Sub is by far the classier, more timeless design. So what if you can get 2 Omegas , or 3 Tudors, or 5 Longines etc..
Simply looks wise - Baltic Aquascaphe is cooler than both ;)
Great video. Many thanks.
went down the mall and tried the seamaster on
then tried on the breitling superocean 46 mm
A17378E71C1A1
and much preferred to the omega , i think
the omega rubber strap is kinda shiny and feels
a bit cheap and no deployment clasp at that price ?
the rubber strap on my oris aquis is better than omega ..
in the end bought the breitling , not in the mall though ,
in the uk the omega seameaster is £5600 on metal
strap and the super ocean is £4300 ,
managed to find an as new 4 month old 46 mm
super ocean for £2800 thats on the metal strap
and guess what , when i got it is a brand new with all
paperwork and the first owner had extended the warranty
from 2 years to 4 , and guess what else was in the box ?
the breitling blue rubber strap with deployment clasp ....
i like not having the date on the watch as never use them
anyway ...
should hold its money at that price and in time maybe increase ...
Agee, I have an Omega 300m and I can get GS snowflake or an aquaterra still cheaper than a sub.
Don't you do speaker reviews?
You're not the cheap watch man when you show watches that cost 1000's of dollars
A.I. auto-CAD, CNC produced, with an arbitrarily "Limited Edition". The algorithm will soon offer limited edition leap year, then Haley's comet, then Limited edition because it's Tuesday etc. Rage against the machine.
It's by far less comfortable than a Submariner. Watch is fine, but it's about time they redesign the bracelet, it needs taper and some chamfers at least on the underside. Plus a smaller clasp. Luckily Rolex already provides this since 2009.
Very good comparison review thank you Randy. I am fortunate enough to have a white dial 300m but every time Omega bring out another colourway or variant I would generally like to own it. I also agree that the strap changing offers the opportunity to reinvent or freshen up the look. Omega have NATO options as well, I would however just highlight the cost of the mesh which is off the scale at £750. I have a GMT which rarely gets worn as the value has increased considerably and stupidly since I bought it so I'm kinda frightend to wear it, not an issue with the Omega.
I think either will serve you well depending on which camp you fall into but I don't see the Rolex being worth double the Omega in my humble opinion.
Change it up next one no diving watch’s Tissot gentleman for one
Not,…
That helium release wart 😂😂😂😂 awful design and should be integrated into the case
It’s distinctive, it’s purposeful and just an added touch over other dive watches in the market, it’s a bad boy!
damn.. im amazed how luxury watches are so much cheaper in the US compared to Europe with the US having much higher salary than in Europe 😂 the bond omega costs 11k €.. here, which is about 12k$ .. the new diver 300 ocean blue is 9000€ which is hozt 9,5K $ or somethin like that.. and the rolex sub cause its not available, costs in the grey market bout 30-40k€ which is i guess 33-45k $
(Not) Cheap Watch, man . . .
I have this piece, its a quality watch.
Upping the price 2x a year is taking the P
I had a look yesterday and it’s now gone up another £100!!! Meaning that it’s been raised 3x (from £6600 to £6900 to £7500 to £7600) all in the space of a year…mind blowing!
I mean I get it. Pound for pound the Omega is good deal on paper... But it is not a Submariner, it does not have the brutalist design that is preserved from the days of the Cold War, it is too shiny, it has AR coating on top of the crystal (abysmal and annoying) and the bracelet and clasp are.. ok-ish. Hence why I own the no date Sub and not the SMP. Yes, Rolex are autists and their AD's can suck it, but I got the only model I love, so I could care less.
with the new hideous case back, for sure is crushing rolex
You always go a great job.
Ìt's not limited edition, is it?
Bracelet sucks and the main reason I sold the blue SMP
Omega can’t hang with Rolex. Rolex will always be more valued than Omega.
Omega just isn't there design-language-wise
Tudor fanboy spotted 😂😂😂😂😂
Huh?
After watching your review of the James Cameron Deepsea, I got a 126660 model and love it. I have the Seamaster 300 summer blue and my AD just got a Seamaster 300M summer blue in used. I just put that one on layaway.
Can’t sell a video these days without mentioning Rolex. I really don’t think Omega is beating Rolex at anything tbh. Chunky ugly, nasty bracelet and clasp undesirable next to the Submariner. Glad that Rolex being unavailable has pushed some people to buy Omega, but Tudor is coming for that pie soon.
Rolex: We got DeepSea, a well known true dive instrument.
Omega: “Presenting an Easter egg on Ultra Deep(Omega was here)”.Sorry we didn’t catch that, would you say it again.
The ultra deep is amazing, too big for my tastes and more watch than I’ll ever need but it is a home run, Rolex just got served 😂
Click bait title … Sub embarrassed by omega 😂😂😂😂
Everyone swings at the king, Rolex but I forsee their reign lasting another generation.
Rolex isnt even a watch in my opinion, its an investment. Tudor is the watch a smart consumer buys when they want to daily a Rolex.
Omega has the James Bond providence which is big with yhe boomer generation. But how many Speedmasters can they make and recreate? Theyre putting them on swatches now. Do you see Rolex ever pulling that stunt? You dont have to be a forum junky either to start putting together the pieces about their reliability and service costs, they all will tell you just pay AD price because you will need the warranty.
Nah, Rolex just put bubbles on theirs
Yish! When will Omega get rid of that ugly, useless manual Helium escape valve?
Don’t hate, it’s a great design add on, purposeful and unique, only reason other luxury brands don’t have one is because they know it’s an instant rip off
omega just feels cheaply made in comparison to rolex and they always end up running less accurately than my rolexes. You get what you pay for
😂 are you for real? Don’t even compare Omega to Rolex, such young companies like Rolex don’t belong in the same sentence, especially when they are overhyped, over priced and unavailability unless you kiss peoples asses
Rolex has become a joke not prestigious
@@maverick4177they are unavailable because literally everyone wants them lmfao. omega cant even sell out their limited editions
rolex is trash overpaying for a dumb crown really?
@@giovannibucio no, paying for actual heritage and premium quality. not for a Swatch Group designated mid-tier brand
Omega was effectively reinvigorated by a jcbiver who started the frankenbrand, threw swatch money at everything and everyone until something sticks.
Rolex did none of that shit, they have consistently built their brand based on quality and status. The only time omega truly had a leg up was on their milled clasps- rolex responded with the glide lock. The best in the industry past 14 years.
Love the Omega!!! Great Review Randy!!! 👍👍👍
I love this watch!! This one and the paris 2024 model are just wrist porn!!!
both are pretty ugly. only the lange or the patek at 3 times that price are the starting point. too expensive, so no watch for me.
Different taste, I wont change one Sub for 10 horrible Seamasters! That absurd hands and general design of the Seamaster, it looks like a toy, that ridiculous valve at 10 that nobody needs, and the finishing on the Rolex is spectacular and timeless.
Rolex and Tudor fanboy spotted 😂😂😂😂😂
Now would you trade your Rolex sub for a Ulysse Nardin 333-77-7 (my pick over a sub)?
Clown.
Of course you wouldn’t, it would be impossible to get two Seamasters for the price of a Sub, let alone ten! 🤣🤣🤣 Clown. So do tell us what is so great about the most copied watch in the world of horology. And I want details about the actual Submariner, not the crappy Orient you own.
To Me These Omega's Are Ugly ! The Price Range Makes A Difference To Compare These To A James Cameron Makes No Sense
A 6 Thousand - A 20 Thousand Dollar Watch This Is Funny. The Rolex Will Increase In Value And The Omega Will Not !
just because rolex is more popular doesent mean its the best, it does brainwash ppl alot like apple products but nahh theres better choices out there. am a omega fan also vacherron constantinand JLC but never again rolex there so outdated and ugly looking
There is no comparison to a Deep Sea James Cameron. Rolex is -2/+2 seconds per day vs Omega -4 / +6 seconds per day. The crown screw down on the Omega is not as refined as well as the the bezel click. Rolex smokes an Omega 300M
You have it the wrong way around. Omega is 0 /+5 sec a day (METAS) and Rolex is -4 /+6 sec a day (COSC). Rolex then claims -2/+2 sec a day ( Superlative). The problem with superlative is 1. It's not independently verified 2. It's not transparent on what happens during the test. And 3. What they do tell us is it's tested on a watch winder.
The watch winder is an issue because a watches accuracy over 24 hrs is to give the variance over 24 hrs of mainspring depletion because the mainspring cannot deliver torque with any consistency. So COSC and METAS tests are done to ensure the automatic rotor does not replenish mainspring power. Superlative test is done to ensure the rotor DOES replenish mainspring power.
I'm still saving for my omega, i keep getting close but something happens where i have to spend some. This time it was 2 new tyres, two front shocks and the M.O.T. so that was a quick £500 from my watch savings. I will get there soon. Cheers Randy.
soon!!!!
Keep pushing. The setbacks just make it all the sweeter once you get there. Like the Pontiff says "it's gotta hurt".