The Problem with the Royal Oak

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 кві 2023

КОМЕНТАРІ • 307

  • @jackrice4064
    @jackrice4064 Рік тому +1567

    I don't very often find myself 150 meters underwater with my high-end watch but that's just me

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 Рік тому +79

      Watch depth ratings have no safety factor, most things like elevator need 3x safety factor or at least double. So if you dive to 100m you need 200m resistance. And 50m watches also leak after a certain amount of time too. You should never swim in 50m rated watches

    • @blendertimelapses9577
      @blendertimelapses9577 Рік тому +17

      @@melody3741i still wouldn't swim 50 meters underwater, when's the last time you did that?

    • @pete6705
      @pete6705 Рік тому

      When you’re in the hot tub with hookers or gold diggers you want to know that the best possible water resistance is there

    • @bosnakedisniksic
      @bosnakedisniksic Рік тому +57

      ​@@blendertimelapses9577 did you not read what he said? He said he wouldn't even swim in it. As in at a foot depth. I wouldn't trust getting it wet

    • @ciuwandy9238
      @ciuwandy9238 Рік тому +25

      Water resistant on watches is not the “safe” distance that you can go. It’s tested with a controlled, distilled water, no waves, a very short amount of time, very consistent water with a manually operated machine. So if you go swimming with it, you will splashing around in salty and wavy water which is not consistent. It’s the same when you run in a controlled environment with profesional stand and comparing it to running down a hill where there are little oxygen.
      I hope that clear things up and why you need a minimum of 100m or water resistant to go swimming without getting water inside and potentially rust the movement inside which cost you hundreds to thousands to repair for a mechanical/automatic watch.

  • @stuartsneddon7738
    @stuartsneddon7738 Рік тому +855

    Yes I often go 70m deep wearing a $50000 watch. Who doesn't.

    • @tvnja
      @tvnja Рік тому +15

      Everyone who has a dive watch should.
      Just like every Jordan owner should play basketball.

    • @kenyongalovich6252
      @kenyongalovich6252 Рік тому +2

      @@tvnja what about the people who wear vans or blazers or SB’s that don’t skate or running shoes that don’t run you do realize that Air Force 1’s and converse were also originally basketball shoes I have many Jordan’s and I play basketball but I think if you just like the look of the shoe you can absolutely wear them and never have to step on a court

    • @tvnja
      @tvnja Рік тому

      @@kenyongalovich6252 I own romaleos and I use them exclusively for the gym and not even for every exercise. I'd never wear them outside a gym.
      But that's just me.

    • @kenyongalovich6252
      @kenyongalovich6252 Рік тому

      @@tvnja yes I have gym shoes that I only wear to the gym that’s a different circumstance because a gym shoe isn’t stylish or integrated in the fashion culture like Jordan’s and vans I’m not saying it’s weird to have shoes for certain things and I have the newer basketball sneakers I only use for basketball but Jordans are outdated and seen more as a streetwear shoe but also saying that you can’t wear vans if you don’t skate or you can’t wear Jordan’s if you don’t hoop is completely absurd

    • @Mo_Mo_
      @Mo_Mo_ Рік тому +7

      Just because it says it is WR up to 50m doesn't mean it waterproof you shouldn't even go swimming with 5 ATM watches. Reason being is the pressure in the water that builds up when swimming making it very probable that your watch will let water in and ruin the watch. Heck even cheap Casios have 100m WR 😅

  • @motionplays9452
    @motionplays9452 Рік тому +246

    Tf dose a number matter when you will never take it for a swim

    • @illuminati8532
      @illuminati8532 Рік тому +3

      I wear mine in the pool just fine salt waters not real good for the metal over time but a pool harmless

    • @rollin60z
      @rollin60z Рік тому

      I wear my Rolex to swims everytime i go

    • @jonlikesplanes
      @jonlikesplanes Рік тому

      @@rollin60zif it has 100m or over it’s ok.

    • @CeeWorld69
      @CeeWorld69 7 місяців тому

      @@illuminati8532Why tf would you even do that anyway???

    • @illuminati8532
      @illuminati8532 7 місяців тому +4

      @@CeeWorld69 it’s a watch not a priceless medallion

  • @ronniefnd
    @ronniefnd Рік тому +259

    Crap. I was so gonna buy one of these to learn to scuba dive with. I guess I can't do either now.

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 6 місяців тому +2

      You know nothing about watches, do you? 50 metres rating means you can’t even swim with it reliably. At any depth.

    • @TheMahin95
      @TheMahin95 5 місяців тому +4

      He was being sarcastic 😂​@@TheEchelon

    • @appleman29
      @appleman29 5 місяців тому +2

      should delete your comment lol@@TheEchelon

    • @T3rm3nator
      @T3rm3nator 4 місяці тому

      ​@@TheEchelonMy frederique constant vitality had 5 Atm rating
      Did swim and dive 3 meters underwater, the watch is fine.
      Also the sun burst blue dial would put many expensive watches a run for its money.

  • @simon-orlandosinghai
    @simon-orlandosinghai Рік тому +15

    Ap bracelets always go so well with the watch, probrably my favourite high end watch brand

  • @KyleDeVilliers
    @KyleDeVilliers 4 місяці тому +2

    People who obsess over WR numbers never even spend any time underwater

  • @suitedandbooted6612
    @suitedandbooted6612 Рік тому +54

    For people who don’t know, 50m basically means it’s okay if it gets slightly wet while washing your hands. 100m is okay for pool swimming, 300m+ would be okay to dive with at normal scuba depths of

    • @kingoftampa
      @kingoftampa Рік тому +2

      50m with a screw down crown is fine for surface splashing

    • @DragonKing3010
      @DragonKing3010 Рік тому

      I fucking hate this myth and people that keep positing it as fact.

    • @lud6441
      @lud6441 11 місяців тому

      How about for showering?

    • @suitedandbooted6612
      @suitedandbooted6612 11 місяців тому +1

      @@lud6441 realistically, you shouldn’t wear a watch while showering or in a hot tub. The heat and pressure combined is very hard on the rubber seals. If you were going to shower with a watch, I would say at least 100m. But honestly, you should take your watch off to shower so you can wash your wrist. Your arm gets sweaty under the watch band. You need to wash it. 😂 If you keep your watch on 24/7, it will get all nasty with dead skin grime. Also, how long are you in the shower that you need to check your watch? 😂 lol.

    • @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available
      @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available 5 місяців тому +4

      ​@@suitedandbooted6612How are you supposed to time the 5 min necessary for the conditioner to remain in your hair if you don't have a watch? Huh?

  • @user-hq9bh5gi5t
    @user-hq9bh5gi5t 6 місяців тому +1

    That Vacheron Overseas Blue gets me every time.

  • @duhvakiin3467
    @duhvakiin3467 9 місяців тому +1

    Ironic when you realize that the designer of the watch, Gerald Genta, actually drew inspiration from vintage diving helmets when designing the Royal Oak lol

  • @Peter-tc3ep
    @Peter-tc3ep Рік тому +55

    Unfortunately 50m water resistance does not mean you can dive with your watch.
    “50M Water Resistance: Wearable around sinks, during swimming, athletic sports, in shallow waters, but not while snorkeling or scuba diving.
    100M Water Resistance: Wearable around sinks, during swimming, poolside diving, snorkeling, but not while jet-skiing or scuba diving.”
    The reason most actual dive watches are 200m water resistance or more. And a sport watch at that price point should be 100m water resistance. When I go on vacation I often will not take off my watch since hotel safes aren’t great and it’s a pain to use the front desk safe repetitively. So I’d at least like to be able to snorkel or swim in the ocean in my watch.

    • @tomhaynes99
      @tomhaynes99 Рік тому

      Can get away with shallow scuba diving to around 18 metres with 100m too as long as it’s from a reputable brand

    • @Peter-tc3ep
      @Peter-tc3ep Рік тому +1

      @@tomhaynes99 it’s not recommended, only swimming, snorkeling, nothing deeper then 10 feet. 200m would be for a resort or not too deep of a dive. 300m for standard diving.

  • @itsnowjoke1381
    @itsnowjoke1381 Рік тому +37

    You would have to be mad to swim in a royal oak

  • @steamroller257
    @steamroller257 Рік тому +3

    It's due to the octagonal bezel secured by white golden screws, which are amazing but too thin and weak to deliver a waterproof superior to 50m.
    Differently from the Patek and Vacheron, the AP bezel is not part of the case but a separated piece.

  • @udosmesovsky4249
    @udosmesovsky4249 Рік тому +11

    10 years ago, nobody gave attention to these watches. It is a social media phaenomenon!

    • @alexso4
      @alexso4 8 місяців тому +3

      Oh but people did, but it was known between the rich. AP has been around since the 1800s

    • @udosmesovsky4249
      @udosmesovsky4249 8 місяців тому

      ​@@alexso4 oh, really 😮 didn't know that ... 😂

    • @a.esposito8528
      @a.esposito8528 5 місяців тому +2

      Royal oak has 50 years bro

    • @titorocha5771
      @titorocha5771 Місяць тому

      @@alexso4prices have skyrocketed because of social media

  • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
    @The_real_Mr_Ghost 6 місяців тому +1

    and no Extension link and they brake all the time...........

  • @4lifefc
    @4lifefc 27 днів тому +1

    I always chuckle looking at my submariner in the deep end of the pool thinking this 15 feet is the deepest it’s going to go… ever

  • @jsc6288
    @jsc6288 2 місяці тому +1

    ok seems alot of people dont understands how it works whilst it might say "water resistant to 50m" the way they test it is with pressure effectively false advertising so no i wouldnt even feel sale washing my hands with a 50m watch because water can get in very easily

  • @andreabadino4873
    @andreabadino4873 19 днів тому +1

    Diver's favorite watch

  • @AfnanStudio_
    @AfnanStudio_ 3 місяці тому +1

    Guess everybody that bought this AP will take their suit and dive more than 50m

  • @liox_1993
    @liox_1993 6 місяців тому +1

    my little 8k rolex having 300 meters 🤭

  • @Gii1234
    @Gii1234 4 місяці тому

    When it comes to watches 50m means it’s only appropriate to wash your hands in it, you cannot take a 50m watch swimming at all. This is a huge huge problem with this watch. 100m is minimum for a swim.

  • @makmat400
    @makmat400 2 місяці тому +11

    For guys who doesn't give a f about watches:
    30m of WR for light rain
    50m of WR is for Heavy rain
    100m of WR you can barely swim
    200+ can be divers watch

    • @CrabbinFever
      @CrabbinFever 2 місяці тому +3

      Try and provide accurate information if you're going to attempt to teach beginners. Thanks

    • @makmat400
      @makmat400 2 місяці тому +3

      @@CrabbinFever what's wrong?

    • @CrabbinFever
      @CrabbinFever 2 місяці тому +2

      @@makmat400 Other than your attitude when taking criticism, nothing is wrong. Thanks.

    • @virusthree
      @virusthree Місяць тому +2

      @@CrabbinFever ?? lmao what

    • @davidlanglois6055
      @davidlanglois6055 Місяць тому +3

      ​@@CrabbinFever Go get a hug you need it

  • @derekstiles5801
    @derekstiles5801 Рік тому +12

    You know good and damn well you ain’t fixing to dive with that watch.
    😂

  • @_angl_
    @_angl_ 3 місяці тому +1

    Anyone who actually dives isn't doing it with a high horology watch. MAYBE a Rolex.

  • @junito1008
    @junito1008 Місяць тому +1

    Tell me time that you've been under water below 10 feet...so you will never be below 50meters be quiet and wear the damn watch.

  • @jobkuperus
    @jobkuperus Рік тому +1

    As a Naui / GUE Tech 2 diver I can 400% assure you that at +50mtr / +170ft dives (which are multi tank / multi gas decompression dives) you do not even WANT this on your wrist.

    • @questionyourself718
      @questionyourself718 Рік тому

      Wouldnt be resistant anyway 😄 its not 50m deepness resistant. Its just resistant against the pressure at 50m but tested in a laboratory. In real life with water around it and movement the water still comes in. 50meter wr means its okay to wear it in light rain or get a couple drops on it when cleaning dishes etc. A shower is already to much.

  • @edgarmartins1811
    @edgarmartins1811 Рік тому +1

    That's the only reason I don't buy one....

  • @Sovnarkom
    @Sovnarkom 11 місяців тому +1

    50m because you probably should take it into the shower when washing up after sharing your suite with a native.

  • @oak6302
    @oak6302 Рік тому +1

    I don’t get why it has a date, thats the only downside for me

  • @JD-ml7cg
    @JD-ml7cg Рік тому +1

    They put 50meters on there because it's actually indestructible. They never thought others would go higher.

  • @Happy-mh8xq
    @Happy-mh8xq 18 днів тому

    It’s rated to that doesn’t mean it actually would work under water and I can’t see anyone wearing anything expensive to go underwater it’s just silly 😂

  • @ats-3693
    @ats-3693 7 днів тому

    Meanwhile I have a Planet Ocean 600m and don't even wear it swimming 😏 not because I'm worried water will get inside I know that won't happen, I just worry that I'll catch it on something while messing around in the water and it will somehow come off my wrist without me realising 😳

  • @koby-h
    @koby-h Рік тому +1

    In what situation are you swimming 164 ft underwater with a luxery watch seriously i dont even think james bind would find himself in that situation

  • @LB-fi3xd
    @LB-fi3xd 11 місяців тому

    I love my life but the problem is I only make $94M usd a year my friends are making billions every month.

  • @louzer4609
    @louzer4609 11 місяців тому

    I was just swimming with my AP when i realized it was a 50000 dollar watch AND YOU DONT SWIM WITH A WATCH THAT IS LITERALLY AS EXPENSIVE AS A BRAND NEW CAR!!!
    (Also I dont actually have an AP)

  • @josteinholen1312
    @josteinholen1312 6 місяців тому

    I did not know this. Seeing that this is a watch that I aspire to own, I am disappointed.

  • @kmolyneux86
    @kmolyneux86 19 днів тому

    Id only ever dive 49m wearing my Royal Oak

  • @TomasEriksson001
    @TomasEriksson001 10 місяців тому

    My AD by accident pressure tested my 15400st for 10bar/100m, passed perfectly. Wore it in the ocean, saunas, hot tubs since I got it in 2015, no issues.

    • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
      @The_real_Mr_Ghost 6 місяців тому +1

      bs it would never hold. AP would never test it more than 5bar

  • @jhandal311
    @jhandal311 Рік тому +3

    Isnt that what the off shore is for ?

    • @Bestow3000
      @Bestow3000 Рік тому

      Yeah but the off shore design is ugly tbh

  • @BozgorSlayer
    @BozgorSlayer 2 місяці тому

    Even Seiko "Royal Oak" mods are 100M...

  • @zevlerner6167
    @zevlerner6167 Рік тому +5

    as long as i can wash my hands i think i’m all set 😭

    • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
      @The_real_Mr_Ghost 6 місяців тому

      yes you can as long as the watch is not under water....otherwise u are fiked

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 Рік тому +7

    WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT THE WHOLE POINT WAS IT WAS WATERPROOF
    IT LITERALLY HAS BOLTS HOLDING THE DAMN CASE TOGETHER

  • @SimonSayad
    @SimonSayad 2 дні тому

    Nobody goes swimming deeper than 10 feet on a regular basis with or without a watch let alone and expensive AP!

  • @Tiberiusvonfunk
    @Tiberiusvonfunk 4 місяці тому

    Unless you dive commercially you will never wear a watch at 50m never mind 150. And even if you did I think you’d leave your AP on dry land

  • @franciscocartagenaburgos3765
    @franciscocartagenaburgos3765 2 місяці тому +2

    bs, pretty sure you are not going below 50m with an AP

  • @niyarparashar8492
    @niyarparashar8492 4 місяці тому

    Well if you have such an expensive watch. You wouldn't mind the water rating😂

  • @tomminter1717
    @tomminter1717 6 місяців тому

    Who needs a Royal Oak to dive down 100m 😂

  • @micaljimenez7381
    @micaljimenez7381 3 місяці тому

    in fact you will never go to 100 meter with your royal oak,only if you are pasanger of the titanic😅,but your right,its a little detail,an other detail more important for me is the seconds whovare not present,that make the watch more boring and without animation,just my point of view,if you send me the royal oak i accept it😅

  • @dorothyreynold5419
    @dorothyreynold5419 Рік тому +2

    you cant afford it is another negative

  • @goldmachine1535
    @goldmachine1535 Рік тому

    When my problems become like this I'll be happy

  • @l8Os
    @l8Os 5 місяців тому

    I can guarantee you with 100% certainty nobody is wearing that watch scuba diving in the first place

  • @micklo106
    @micklo106 11 місяців тому

    I can’t swim so the pool is just fine to floss.😂

  • @thiagoluiz3041
    @thiagoluiz3041 6 місяців тому

    In most places 100m deep you’ll barely see anything without using artificial light 😂

  • @pnash225
    @pnash225 9 місяців тому

    Biggest issue with the Royal Oak is the lack of micro adjustment in the bracelet.

  • @roderick9018
    @roderick9018 5 місяців тому

    50m water rating means safe for splashes from washing hands, you can't swim in a pool with that rating. 100m rating is minimum for swimming for pressure. They are rated at static water setting. 200m and up are good for diving / water sports like water sking.

  • @sergeyyurchenko7014
    @sergeyyurchenko7014 4 місяці тому

    Yeah everyday diving with 50k watches problem

  • @friskjidjidoglu7415
    @friskjidjidoglu7415 7 місяців тому

    I was going to say the lack of microadjusments

  • @thiankloppenburg9019
    @thiankloppenburg9019 Рік тому +1

    Just buy a g shock

  • @Yesman10
    @Yesman10 5 місяців тому

    That’s going nowhere near the water when I get one

  • @CeeWorld69
    @CeeWorld69 7 місяців тому

    Bro do you plan on SWIMMING in your $30K+ watch!!!???? WTF!????

  • @Pwnziillaaaa
    @Pwnziillaaaa Місяць тому

    Nobody is putting these watches in a meter of salt water lol

  • @WouterZtube
    @WouterZtube Рік тому

    I don’t like a lot about that watch:
    - The logo on the dial
    - The AP logo on the clasp
    - All the angles and sharp edges. The Nautilus looks way better.
    - The dial
    - The hype
    - The price

  • @user-mo4jd7oe9p
    @user-mo4jd7oe9p 6 місяців тому

    Casio Edifice 100m wr , chronograph, date, sapphire crystal,all stainless steel and is lookalike to Ap for 1 % of the price XD

  • @udosmesovsky4249
    @udosmesovsky4249 5 місяців тому

    For AP its too costly to change the WR to 100m. They gonna sell them anyhow. Same with finde adjustment clasp. Those things lower the margin!

  • @zoltanember6353
    @zoltanember6353 5 місяців тому

    I wouldn't even wear a watch in a swimming pool, let alone when diving at sea.

  • @ItsMe-sf7kh
    @ItsMe-sf7kh 8 місяців тому

    Otherwise you can dive 100 meters bro ? Like is this the only thing stopping you 😂

  • @Leody9
    @Leody9 6 місяців тому

    As if u will go beyond 50m underwater with an AP lmao

  • @sahilthebighill236
    @sahilthebighill236 Рік тому +14

    I love how you act like your actually gonna take your royal oak down to 150m of water but in reality the most water its gonna see is when your washing your hand

    • @feynex31
      @feynex31 8 місяців тому +1

      Static pressure is not the same as dynamic pressure.

    • @feynex31
      @feynex31 8 місяців тому +1

      100m is for casual swimming

    • @sahilthebighill236
      @sahilthebighill236 8 місяців тому

      @@feynex31 I swim with my Casio a500 that's rated for 30m all the time and it's perfectly fine🤷‍♂️

  • @YusufEbr
    @YusufEbr 3 місяці тому

    You guys won't have the balls to take this diving let alone go in a pool with this

  • @verynormalman
    @verynormalman Місяць тому

    If you're going to pretend to be a big shot, then get the watches actually sized to your wrist. It looks really sad!

  • @thefunnytech7354
    @thefunnytech7354 10 місяців тому

    Let's face it if your wearing this watch your not even washing your own dishes😮

  • @mahefarafidison7388
    @mahefarafidison7388 Рік тому

    A person who can afford a AP can easily get another dive watch ...why are they going to wear AP so deep?

  • @jayc4715
    @jayc4715 Рік тому

    Ap look like the old quartz to Rolex

  • @vladislavkotenko9120
    @vladislavkotenko9120 8 місяців тому

    Who goes diving in these kind of watches? 😂

  • @Theo_lewis_13
    @Theo_lewis_13 Рік тому

    “Only 50m” bffr

  • @Arylist
    @Arylist 11 місяців тому

    "Theres only 50 meters" whens the last time you swam? Not even talking about swimming with the watch

  • @nikkimiddlekillsday5161
    @nikkimiddlekillsday5161 Рік тому +1

    Yeah AP doesn't give good water resistance

  • @commentator2.0
    @commentator2.0 6 місяців тому

    Who fucking cares about water resistance when you don’t even get it wet period

  • @OdahAsdinta
    @OdahAsdinta Місяць тому

    Who the hell go underwater with an AP mate

  • @joezunenet
    @joezunenet 9 місяців тому

    Good luck scuba diving at 150 feet (50M), let along 300 feet.

  • @guttguttdettemablisluttgut8701
    @guttguttdettemablisluttgut8701 2 місяці тому +2

    If your watch has 50 m water resistance you shouldnt even be swimming with it.

  • @houlester
    @houlester 9 місяців тому

    I’ll have to stick with my Patek Tiffany for those 300ft dives I guess

  • @oh033
    @oh033 Місяць тому

    why tf are you swimming with a mechanical watch anyway? Diving computers exist.

  • @charles5697
    @charles5697 4 місяці тому

    No way he said that

  • @Ian-ij4of
    @Ian-ij4of Рік тому

    Maurice lacroix Aikon has 200m water resistance with a screw down crown...😊

  • @americanpaisareturns9051
    @americanpaisareturns9051 Рік тому

    To me it’s hideous looking status symbol but to others it a beautiful peace of fine art. To each their own. Good for you.

  • @kingoftampa
    @kingoftampa Рік тому

    The nautilus has 120m WR

  • @joeltroughton3021
    @joeltroughton3021 2 місяці тому

    Everyone acting like the snorkel all the time

  • @dancarthen3634
    @dancarthen3634 Місяць тому

    like they will ever see use below 5 meters? 😂

  • @FaeezKardar
    @FaeezKardar Рік тому

    Who the fuck goes under 50 meters with an AP 😅

  • @gregkollaeg2365
    @gregkollaeg2365 7 місяців тому

    Most irelevant thing ever! You dive 100m? Never

  • @OZ_industries
    @OZ_industries 6 місяців тому

    Like anyone is going swimming with their AP 💀

  • @aahanimation
    @aahanimation 10 місяців тому

    As if you'd bring a watch that expensive 50m under the damn water bro 😭

  • @irwankrisnawan905
    @irwankrisnawan905 5 місяців тому

    Simple buy an offshore version

  • @PaulaCampbell-hx7np
    @PaulaCampbell-hx7np 5 місяців тому

    The AP RO design or just AP in general has got to be the most copied watch design ever.

  • @brianpatrik
    @brianpatrik 2 місяці тому

    50m is several feet beyond the recreational dive limit

  • @user-dz6eg2hy2s
    @user-dz6eg2hy2s 4 місяці тому

    You won't wear them to even wash dishes...

  • @immanuelesimonelli
    @immanuelesimonelli Рік тому

    I bet you’ve never even gone 50 m underwater

  • @Andy-vg7rh
    @Andy-vg7rh 4 місяці тому

    ap will never see this or give a fk what u think..

  • @reallyswiipy
    @reallyswiipy Рік тому

    yea i hate it when i wanna go 100 meters underwater and my AP can only handle 50

  • @giorgiodainese2713
    @giorgiodainese2713 Рік тому

    Bro didn't turn his brain on