I love reading the Old Testament. Shows like this help me connect to the stories about David and the kings that followed him. Not to mention the destruction of Jerusalem and the prophets.
That's not how you spell algorithm and there is a search feature you can use to find this stuff. Why are you relying on UA-cam to tell you what you want.
@@kumarg3598 True, I misspelled a word, UA-cam isn't responsible for telling Me what I want and so I don't rely on it to tell me what I want to see.... I was using Cynicism, a tool I'm CERTAIN YOU KNOW.
Great show. Thanks so much. As a 19 year old kid, I walked those walls in 1973. Still gives me shivers. The center of the universe no doubt. I could feel time racing past. It felt like if I did not leave soon the world would come to an end. The further away I ran the slower the time was.... Truly a moving place.
They can't carbon date my heart. That is where the truth resides. Heaven is in your heart and peace is in your mind. You can't find one with out the other.
Shalom, Thank you for presenting this study. Baruch Hashem! Am Yisrael chai, Baruch haba b'shem Adonai! (Matthew 23:39) Be well and be Blessed! A fellow sojourner
Thanks Brent. Your podcasts and magazine are top-notch! I'm so glad I discovered them. And your generosity in offering the magazine for free is an amazing blessing. Thank you!
I thought it was awesome to see them dig those bullea in the Ophir of Isaiah and Hezekiah. In 2 Chronicles 31:11 it says; Then Hezekiah commanded to prepare chambers in the house of the Lord; and they prepared them. Pretty cool. Sounds like they were in the temple when they found them. Bringing the Bible to life.
I agree! I actually can't believe the quality of the physical pages, only surpassed by the contents. I'm only on my second issue, but I'm well impressed.
Brent, it was great to meet you personally at the exhibit yesterday. The exhibit is amazing and a must see for everyone who is, or travels to the area. The team was extremely friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable. My Dad and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I’ll be back.
I received the last two editions of your magazine (to Australia) in the mail. For a book lover like me the format is greatly superior to online. I have a general interest in history/archaeology so I avidly read them from cover to cover. Thanks so much!
@@sigurdholbarki8268 In the UK??? I thought they kicked all you people out shortly after they chased Harald's cowards all the way across Stamford bridge. Oh well, you can only choose your friends eh? My scots forefathers bequeathed to me The Curse of The Stingy. So you may imagine how the fact of its being free tickles my fancy.
No it's not lol! Abraham couldn't have used camels as pack animals since domestication of camels occurred around 1200 BC, NOT 2,000 BC. Abraham could have only used donkeys and this is only one of the many inaccuracies! The reason for this error is due to when the Torah was written and nobody at the time knew anything about their past. The Torah and other books were written through the eyes of people 600 to 800 years after the Exodus, that could have done not occurred in 1209 BC! Think of how medieval artists created images of Biblical times using clothes and building styles from their time. People of the past didn't have archaeology or any clue how life was during the time they wrote about. The original Torah wasn't finalized until Ezra, who harmonized the various sources which are called Jahwist, Elohist, Priestly Source, and DTR 1 & 2. The process began with Josiah's scribes after the Book of the Law was found during renovations of the Temple which was Deuteronomy and is called DTR1 by scholars, which dates to the 10th century BC. The reforms of Josiah occurred after 622 BC, 2Kings 22:18. If anyone tells you the Bible was passed down from Moses until now, unmolested and every word is true, they are uneducated liars. Too many Christians are indoctrineated into this myth and then you're told it's Satanic to analyze the physical history of the Bible. I suggest you ignore anyone telling you this and read about the physical history of the Bible! You can't read the original Hebrew and your KJV is a fourth generation translation. Every translation is an interpretation! I can spend a week straight talking about the issues with the Bible both your version and mine. Get the book WHO WROTE THE BIBLE? BY RICHARD ELLIOT FRIEDMAN which will give you the basics about the evolution of the Torah. There's an Audible book the works with Kindle. So you can listen to books while you do other things! If you refuse to learn about the physical history of the Bible, then enjoy your ignorance!
If he had written, "Yay though I walk through the Kidron Valley," It wouldn't have sounded as important. Yay though I walk through the valley of death, sounds so much more terrifying.
I LOVE Edmond, OK! It’s such a peaceful, beautiful place ; especially the green rolling hills, wildflowers, and lots of meadows. Even the front yards in many areas, are a more natural meadow grass, w/birch trees & flowers, bunnies, birds, deer. I had our windows open 1/3 the year before/c they are all like breezy spring days.
Man is WITHOUT EXCUSE. I would love to be able to come and see the exhibit. Praise the glorious Holy Name of our Lord our God our King our Savior, Jesus Christ!
I totally agree with how the radiometric data supports the Biblical witness. I just wanted to clarify to viewers that you are assuming and utilizing the reigns of Hebrew Kings according to the Thiele school of chronology (just as most everyone else) to correlate and fit into the results. However, I try to convince anyone who will listen that a better case can be made for a chronology based on the Lucianic text of the LXX. In terms of absolute chronology, the Old Greek chronology would put the reign of Jehoash 880-840 BC, and so he would be the more likely builder during the early ninth century in Judah. Also, turns out "the earthquake" dated to ~760 BC is a more complicated consideration because, based on paleoseismic evidence from the Dead Sea area, Marco and Agnon supported TWO significant earthquakes during the mid‐8th century B.C. Those authors give appropriate ranges of dates for the two quakes. Yet, based on other considerations, (such as the testimony of Josephus regarding Uzziah's leprosy near the end of his reign and it relation to the earthquake) it is likely that the second quake was the one noted by Amos and this occurred near the end of Uzziah's reign sometime during 763-760 BC time frame in the Old Greek (Lucianic) absolute chronology of the Kings.
@todddavidmoore Long ago as a bumpkin teenager in the bush I stumbled across a big, fat, old library book which was a tremendously complex reconciliation of three ancient chronologies: Egyptian, Jewish and I cannot recollect the other culture (Greek?). As I was utterly unlettered it shocked me that there was so much uncertainty and wiggle-room on what I had till then assumed were firmly fixed and established facts. Hence the use of regnal dates as described in this video to calibrate “physical” data makes me acutely uneasy when such very fine discrimination is claimed. But hey, what do I know: I’m no academic, just a Deplorable scrabbling round down here amongst the dirt and detritus of commonday happenstance. What I do find heartening though is the flood of detailed, closely scrutinised data and scholarship since back when I was foolishly trying to evade my class status.
I want to study this, but I'm such a layman and slow learner/researcher, it would take me forever to grasp it well enough to form an opinion on that subject for myself.
@@garanceadrosehn9691 Well he/she is wrong. I am an American and I speak American English. You are wrong. Or should I say "Woe unto you!" How about that? Better! We use the word "woe" in two ways. You have got to understand "context" and "slang". You obviously are not an American. Now, how about you both go get a life. Do you understand what I mean by that?
It's like "Woe! That is super cool!" I bet you do not understand that either. You will never understand because you are a foreigner. So, "Woe! How about you get lost?" Understand that one? Probably not. How about you go look it up in some dictionary? Lol.
Carbon dating is a very precise measurement technique with a few huge assumptions built in. An undisturbed sample with carbon can be sampled for relative quantities of Carbon 14. Carbon 14 in the atmosphere is expected to be a given fraction of all the carbon due to solar radiation (assumption number 1) and presume it will always be the same ratio due solar radiation and presume solar radiation doesn’t fluctuate (categorically false). Then presume the carbon from the atmosphere is absorbed by plants and then it is eaten by an animal, then the animal dies then the animal’s horn is untouched for a long time, some of the carbon 14 will break down, then then we can date the horn based on how much carbon 14 remains.
Pretty much. Calculations based on multiple assumptions. If it truly was a discrete process, the same result would be reached every time on the same sample.
I'm aware that geological dating is often a contest, as there are variables to consider. Do I have the following correct? A known-dated event, with a carbon sample of the event and area is taken. It's preferable to have associated supporting date verification, pottery, coins,or dated ostrica etc.. That sample becomes a comparable to any newer samples. It become a date provenance of a sort. This starts a database of "known" reference dates as a comparison index for further samples.
I so wish I was closer to OK, to see this exhibit, But my greatest wish would be to be able to walk where my dear Lord God has walked in Israel. Thank the Lord for Archeology.
Thank you for this! Can you explain to me why the ancient large pottery jars in Jerusalem and around Israel are pointed at the bottom? I have been to Israel more than a few times and have wondered about this. I see some in the background of your video...
Biblical archeology exhibit in Edmond, Oklahoma?! That's my home state! Ughhhh.. I wish I was healthy, so I could go to it. I've been watching biblical archeology videos for a few years now, and I'm currently reading about David in 1 Samuel. I would be there in a heartbeat if I could.
Sorry to hear you can't make it. Please send your address in an email to letters@armstronginstitute.org, requesting the 120 page exhibit edition of our magazine, and we'll send you a copy of that ASAP.
I wonder if someone can use that carbon dating method on sites that have burn layers, like the sites that are believed to be Jericho or Sodom and Gomorrah. Not only is there just a burn layer, but they had found burned grain in pots at the supposed Jericho site. It would be interesting to see what the results would be, even though I'm not fully trusting of radio carbon dating.
Thanks. I just downloaded (for $10) Radiocarbon chronology of Iron Age Jerusalem reveals calibration offsets and architectural developments. Since I have studied chronology decades and have one book on the Bible chronology called: New Chronology Papers, I can use the info on any update of the book.
Brent is irritated very much like I’m irritated by the baseless claims of skeptics. It’s so annoying. They doubt all of the actual known human history. The actual historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science. 1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal 2. Thracians (L) Tiras 3. Siberians (N) Meshek 4. East Asians (O) Magog 5. Medes (PQ) Madai 6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer 7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan 8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad 9. Elamites (H) Elam 10. Assyrians (G) Asshur 11. Arameans (F1) Aram 12. Lydians (F2) Lud 13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush 14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim 15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan 16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes. The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the Semitic N lineage accompanied the Eurasian Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belonging to the Eurasian M lineage also accompanied the Atlantic crossing of the Q paternal haplogroup Medes to Central America. The Semitic B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean to South America. The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher) Of course there is also the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 as well which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
Don't worry too much about the skeptics. They get a rise knowing you are irritated. Better to use that energy to ignore them. But if you're not going to ignore them, then mock them expose them for their small minds. God bless
@@InfoArtistJK Then again, I find it to be important to address and communicate with the skeptics. I welcome dialogue with them. The frustration is when you are unable to convey a response to them.
@JungleJargon I'm talking about the intellectually dishonest "skeptics", who just get a rise out of the attention you give them. Don't waste "pearls before swine." Peace
@JungleJargon I defy you to tell me where our Abos(Oz) came from? They are so otherworldly and unfitted for modern life many suspect they came from outer space.
They carbon dated one of the earliest manuscripts of the Quran. Because of its' importance It went to several different labs for testing and their dates varied by several hundreds of years. Carbon dating is not as accurate as people are led to believe. Scholars will understandably defend their lifetime's work to their last breath and each one has their followers. If a magazine doesn't present and contrast both sides of an issue, the bias becomes visible.
Yeah, it depends on the sample and human error can really screw it up. You normally get a date range and a percentage certainty from the lab. The actual result could be dated AD 1200-1350 with 60% certainty but when it's presented it's written 1275 and the +/- 75 years (in this example) often gets overlooked by the audience and the press sometimes leave it out all together. You do three of those and you can get points all over the board even with a good methodology if the sample is a bit inconsistent
@@matswessling6600 "CIRA International" is a YT channel hosted by an ex-Muslim Saudi now Christian. Him and Dr. Jay Smith with his own channel "PfanderFilms" go over the carbon dating and related academic problems there. Dr. Smith has more real life experience with academic issues. I'm sure if you message him, he can give you the relevant data you're looking for.
Hi The ‘Old house’ effect should have been obvious, even from considering WHO it was that usually did the BUILDING in ancient times, that being the KINGS! We can see from the New Testament how that was still the case with Herod the great who was famous for expanding the Temple and building the sea port at Caesarea and the spectacular fortress of Masada! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua PRINCE OF PEACE returning soon to fulfil the feast of Tabernacles by reigning over His creation on David’s throne from Jerusalem for the seventh millennium to the glory of God The Father!
Til Gat is a hill that King David fought from in Israel. I worked their on a fruit farm picking fruits. Every spot has some history in it and you can find artifacts all over the ground, going back to King David's time. The bible is real..
Actually, there is a Bible Untold course that Alura Cein does on Teachable, I highly recommend it as it reveals the deepest truths and one learns how to decipher the meanings of the texts. King David and King Solomon are not who people think them to be.
Re re skewed article: Shouldn't there be a directory where people can look up a reporter or writer to see their score based on how many times they have to be corrected for falsehoods, misreporting and Bible-bashing? These abusers of truth should not be allowed to hide behind "respectable" publications, because they influence every idiot that reads them.
Read "The Valediction of Moses"; "The Dismembered Bible"; "The Origins of Judaism"; and "Why The Bible Began." All from Jewish scholars - proving the Bible is massively altered - it is not what we've been told folks. The NT is even worse - Paul was found to have been a massive liar - documents in the DSS and found by Eisenman.
I fell for all of that 20 years ago, particularly the Paul stuff. The approaches are very selective in their use of sources and ignore anything that contradicts their thesis. I work with early medieval sources and you can't read them in the same way you'd read a modern source. In biblical scholarship skeptics (or in some cases, cynics) get away with stuff that would get you laughed out of the room or fired in any other field.
@@sigurdholbarki8268 What did you fall for 20 years ago? The books mentioned are very recent and prove what we have in the "Bible" and "Tanach" just couldn't be real history - plus there are too many major contradictions of fact, history, doctrine, and prophecy expectations. I'm publishing a book now called "Romans Proves Paul Lied".
@@CecilSpurlockJr. Sadly not. Try again: "Surely "Biblical Archaeology" is an exercise in confirmation bias? Archaeology is archaeology and cannot dictate what is found."
.... If they're using the Bible to find ancient sites as described per the Bible then it continues to confirm it's authenticity in being an accurate document for our archeological records. Whatever nonsense you're on about is just that, nonsense.
So, he gets all excited that Haaretz reports that a wall is not, after all, Biblical, but is not the least bit concerned that the original claim was wrong? Perhaps he should have been a little less accepting and more questioning of the original claim? Or does it get cut special slack in "Biblical" Archaeology because it was deemed to support the Biblical narrative?
Shalom, Thank you for presenting this study. Baruch Hashem! Am Yisrael chai, Baruch haba b'shem Adonai! (Matthew 23:39) Be well and be Blessed! A fellow sojourner
I love reading the Old Testament. Shows like this help me connect to the stories about David and the kings that followed him. Not to mention the destruction of Jerusalem and the prophets.
I love reading the New Testament
Not to mention the destruction of Jerusalem etc.
See UA-cam??? THIS is the stuff I'm looking for, please adjust the "Algorhythm" to at least "Rhyme" a little❤😂
Haaaaaaaa!!!!! You tell em' !!!
That's not how you spell algorithm and there is a search feature you can use to find this stuff. Why are you relying on UA-cam to tell you what you want.
UA-cam sucks
@@kumarg3598 True, I misspelled a word, UA-cam isn't responsible for telling Me what I want and so I don't rely on it to tell me what I want to see....
I was using Cynicism, a tool I'm CERTAIN YOU KNOW.
@@bryanbulmer6716 YUP, UA-cam TOTALLY SUCKS, but I promise not to like then until they SWALLOW 🤣
Great show. Thanks so much. As a 19 year old kid, I walked those walls in 1973. Still gives me shivers. The center of the universe no doubt. I could feel time racing past. It felt like if I did not leave soon the world would come to an end. The further away I ran the slower the time was.... Truly a moving place.
They can't carbon date my heart. That is where the truth resides. Heaven is in your heart and peace is in your mind. You can't find one with out the other.
as a 19 year old you walked those walls in 1973?
Shalom,
Thank you for presenting this study.
Baruch Hashem!
Am Yisrael chai,
Baruch haba b'shem Adonai!
(Matthew 23:39)
Be well and be Blessed!
A fellow sojourner
Thanks Brent. Your podcasts and magazine are top-notch! I'm so glad I discovered them. And your generosity in offering the magazine for free is an amazing blessing. Thank you!
I love archeology even though I don't understand a lot of the technical information. I find these videos very fascinating and informative.
I thought it was awesome to see them dig those bullea in the Ophir of Isaiah and Hezekiah. In 2 Chronicles 31:11 it says; Then Hezekiah commanded to prepare chambers in the house of the Lord; and they prepared them. Pretty cool. Sounds like they were in the temple when they found them. Bringing the Bible to life.
Your magazine is awesome and it’s free amazing
I agree! I actually can't believe the quality of the physical pages, only surpassed by the contents.
I'm only on my second issue, but I'm well impressed.
I am very thankful and grateful for the copy of the magazine you sent me.I've read every single word.It's absolutely wonderful.
Brent, it was great to meet you personally at the exhibit yesterday. The exhibit is amazing and a must see for everyone who is, or travels to the area. The team was extremely friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable. My Dad and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I’ll be back.
You are most welcome Travis. Glad you could make it!
Really enjoyed the video and signed up for the magazine. Thanks for taking the time to produce these resources and for sharing them for free.
Super cool, and Dinesh DeSouza, too! 😊
Excellent magazine. I love it, and also having a UA-cam channel is an awesome bonus!
God Bless you Brent Nagtegaal Great Podcast.
I received the last two editions of your magazine (to Australia) in the mail. For a book lover like me the format is greatly superior to online. I have a general interest in history/archaeology so I avidly read them from cover to cover. Thanks so much!
I get mine in the UK, people are shocked when I tell them it's free.
Also on my second issue and loving it!
@@sigurdholbarki8268 In the UK??? I thought they kicked all you people out shortly after they chased Harald's cowards all the way across Stamford bridge.
Oh well, you can only choose your friends eh? My scots forefathers bequeathed to me The Curse of The Stingy. So you may imagine how the fact of its being free tickles my fancy.
Thanks - very informative. Also your reporting of the many garrison forts in Biblical times was Edom is great evidence/informaton.
God bless you and thank you for all you do 😊🙏✝️
I ABSOLUTELY love the Old Testament and of course the New Testament which fulfills the Old….give your life to Jesus🙏🙏
Fantastic presentation. I hope to make it to OK before January.
Fascinating. Every word of God is true!
No it's not lol! Abraham couldn't have used camels as pack animals since domestication of camels occurred around 1200 BC, NOT 2,000 BC. Abraham could have only used donkeys and this is only one of the many inaccuracies!
The reason for this error is due to when the Torah was written and nobody at the time knew anything about their past. The Torah and other books were written through the eyes of people 600 to 800 years after the Exodus, that could have done not occurred in 1209 BC! Think of how medieval artists created images of Biblical times using clothes and building styles from their time. People of the past didn't have archaeology or any clue how life was during the time they wrote about.
The original Torah wasn't finalized until Ezra, who harmonized the various sources which are called Jahwist, Elohist, Priestly Source, and DTR 1 & 2. The process began with Josiah's scribes after the Book of the Law was found during renovations of the Temple which was Deuteronomy and is called DTR1 by scholars, which dates to the 10th century BC. The reforms of Josiah occurred after 622 BC, 2Kings 22:18.
If anyone tells you the Bible was passed down from Moses until now, unmolested and every word is true, they are uneducated liars. Too many Christians are indoctrineated into this myth and then you're told it's Satanic to analyze the physical history of the Bible. I suggest you ignore anyone telling you this and read about the physical history of the Bible!
You can't read the original Hebrew and your KJV is a fourth generation translation. Every translation is an interpretation! I can spend a week straight talking about the issues with the Bible both your version and mine. Get the book WHO WROTE THE BIBLE? BY RICHARD ELLIOT FRIEDMAN which will give you the basics about the evolution of the Torah. There's an Audible book the works with Kindle. So you can listen to books while you do other things! If you refuse to learn about the physical history of the Bible, then enjoy your ignorance!
Catching Archeological doc.'s on Israel since I was around age 10 = over 50 years & SO FAR = NEVER found it boring 😊 ● FASCINATING ❤
If he had written, "Yay though I walk through the Kidron Valley," It wouldn't have sounded as important. Yay though I walk through the valley of death, sounds so much more terrifying.
The valley of the shadow of death
Love this channel sooo much! Thanks to all involved and above ALL thank YOU, LORD ✝👑📖🙏🏼❤
Dang. Was just in OKC for business. Wish I would’ve known about this museum then!
I LOVE Edmond, OK!
It’s such a peaceful, beautiful place ; especially the green rolling hills, wildflowers, and lots of meadows.
Even the front yards in many areas, are a more natural meadow grass, w/birch trees & flowers, bunnies, birds, deer.
I had our windows open 1/3 the year before/c they are all like breezy spring days.
Man is WITHOUT EXCUSE.
I would love to be able to come and see the exhibit.
Praise the glorious Holy Name of our Lord our God our King our Savior, Jesus Christ!
I totally agree with how the radiometric data supports the Biblical witness. I just wanted to clarify to viewers that you are assuming and utilizing the reigns of Hebrew Kings according to the Thiele school of chronology (just as most everyone else) to correlate and fit into the results. However, I try to convince anyone who will listen that a better case can be made for a chronology based on the Lucianic text of the LXX. In terms of absolute chronology, the Old Greek chronology would put the reign of Jehoash 880-840 BC, and so he would be the more likely builder during the early ninth century in Judah. Also, turns out "the earthquake" dated to ~760 BC is a more complicated consideration because, based on paleoseismic evidence from the Dead Sea area, Marco and Agnon supported TWO significant earthquakes during the mid‐8th century B.C. Those authors give appropriate ranges of dates for the two quakes. Yet, based on other considerations, (such as the testimony of Josephus regarding Uzziah's leprosy near the end of his reign and it relation to the earthquake) it is likely that the second quake was the one noted by Amos and this occurred near the end of Uzziah's reign sometime during 763-760 BC time frame in the Old Greek (Lucianic) absolute chronology of the Kings.
Thanks for taking the time to write that, I appreciate it!
@todddavidmoore Long ago as a bumpkin teenager in the bush I stumbled across a big, fat, old library book which was a tremendously complex reconciliation of three ancient chronologies: Egyptian, Jewish and I cannot recollect the other culture (Greek?). As I was utterly unlettered it shocked me that there was so much uncertainty and wiggle-room on what I had till then assumed were firmly fixed and established facts.
Hence the use of regnal dates as described in this video to calibrate “physical” data makes me acutely uneasy when such very fine discrimination is claimed.
But hey, what do I know: I’m no academic, just a Deplorable scrabbling round down here amongst the dirt and detritus of commonday happenstance.
What I do find heartening though is the flood of detailed, closely scrutinised data and scholarship since back when I was foolishly trying to evade my class status.
I want to study this, but I'm such a layman and slow learner/researcher, it would take me forever to grasp it well enough to form an opinion on that subject for myself.
Woe! I saw General Flynn in that picture with you! Way cool!
"Whoa" expressed surprise. "Woe" means sorrow.
@@SalvableRuin No it doesnt! You are wrong! Im speaking American English. Woe, in this "context" expresses excitement. Get with it negative Nelly!
@@cmajors4596 - I checked the American dictionary on my Mac, and it looks like SalvableRuin is correct.
@@garanceadrosehn9691 Well he/she is wrong. I am an American and I speak American English. You are wrong. Or should I say "Woe unto you!" How about that? Better! We use the word "woe" in two ways. You have got to understand "context" and "slang". You obviously are not an American. Now, how about you both go get a life. Do you understand what I mean by that?
It's like "Woe! That is super cool!" I bet you do not understand that either. You will never understand because you are a foreigner. So, "Woe! How about you get lost?" Understand that one? Probably not. How about you go look it up in some dictionary? Lol.
There you go! Oklahoma? I’m in far away Missouri.
I love you guys. Your work is outstanding and inspiring.
Expedition Bible UA-cam channel is also talking about the same thing this week
Nice! Love that guy
are you using the jullian calender?
Great stuff ❤ God Bless
From what I understand, carbon dating is about as accurate as the news reporting on CNN... 😵💫
It's accurate in the same way a ruler is. Human error is one problem and the other is it being misrepresented as a magic bullet
Carbon dating is a very precise measurement technique with a few huge assumptions built in.
An undisturbed sample with carbon can be sampled for relative quantities of Carbon 14. Carbon 14 in the atmosphere is expected to be a given fraction of all the carbon due to solar radiation (assumption number 1) and presume it will always be the same ratio due solar radiation and presume solar radiation doesn’t fluctuate (categorically false).
Then presume the carbon from the atmosphere is absorbed by plants and then it is eaten by an animal, then the animal dies then the animal’s horn is untouched for a long time, some of the carbon 14 will break down, then then we can date the horn based on how much carbon 14 remains.
Pretty much. Calculations based on multiple assumptions. If it truly was a discrete process, the same result would be reached every time on the same sample.
they have carbon dated to show that a rock shouldn’t exist, so it’s not accurate but we do know the Bible is true.
Think you
THATS AWESOME
Did you say Edmond ? Is that on the UCO campus or where?
We are at Armstrong Auditorium www.armstrongauditorium.org/visit-armstrong/exhibits
I'm aware that geological dating is often a contest, as there are variables to consider.
Do I have the following correct?
A known-dated event, with a carbon sample of the event and area is taken. It's preferable to have associated supporting date verification, pottery, coins,or dated ostrica etc.. That sample becomes a comparable to any newer samples. It become a date provenance of a sort. This starts a database of "known" reference dates as a comparison index for further samples.
I so wish I was closer to OK, to see this exhibit, But my greatest wish would be to be able to walk where my dear Lord God has walked in Israel. Thank the Lord for Archeology.
Thankyou.
Thank you for this! Can you explain to me why the ancient large pottery jars in Jerusalem and around Israel are pointed at the bottom? I have been to Israel more than a few times and have wondered about this. I see some in the background of your video...
Biblical archeology exhibit in Edmond, Oklahoma?! That's my home state!
Ughhhh.. I wish I was healthy, so I could go to it. I've been watching biblical archeology videos for a few years now, and I'm currently reading about David in 1 Samuel. I would be there in a heartbeat if I could.
Sorry to hear you can't make it. Please send your address in an email to letters@armstronginstitute.org, requesting the 120 page exhibit edition of our magazine, and we'll send you a copy of that ASAP.
I wonder if someone can use that carbon dating method on sites that have burn layers, like the sites that are believed to be Jericho or Sodom and Gomorrah.
Not only is there just a burn layer, but they had found burned grain in pots at the supposed Jericho site. It would be interesting to see what the results would be, even though I'm not fully trusting of radio carbon dating.
What is the thumbnail a picture of? I can't find my glasses.
It's a bat skull, they used it in the dating
You bring up a lot of good points. Do I hear an accent?
Shalom,
Can you direct me to an accurate graph of Biblical dates?
Be well and be Blessed!
Thanks. I just downloaded (for $10) Radiocarbon chronology of Iron Age Jerusalem reveals calibration offsets and architectural developments. Since I have studied chronology decades and have one book on the Bible chronology called: New Chronology Papers, I can use the info on any update of the book.
SPEAK IT. If my Lord ate sour vinegar on the Cross before His death just so 'every jot & tittle' were covered & included, GOD'S WORD IS TRUTH.
It would be fair to assume that it was the presence of the Solomon temple
that triggered the expansion of Jerusalem into a larger city.
But who really is King David? That's such a mystery. Yet I know something that most don't know. ❤
I remember a certain someone.
a mythical figure. not a real person.
A good archaology lesson. And how arrogance can miss a date by 300+ years. And don't let us get started about Bible haters skewing information!
Brent is irritated very much like I’m irritated by the baseless claims of skeptics. It’s so annoying. They doubt all of the actual known human history. The actual historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science.
1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal
2. Thracians (L) Tiras
3. Siberians (N) Meshek
4. East Asians (O) Magog
5. Medes (PQ) Madai
6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer
7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan
8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad
9. Elamites (H) Elam
10. Assyrians (G) Asshur
11. Arameans (F1) Aram
12. Lydians (F2) Lud
13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush
14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim
15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan
16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut
The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes.
The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the Semitic N lineage accompanied the Eurasian Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belonging to the Eurasian M lineage also accompanied the Atlantic crossing of the Q paternal haplogroup Medes to Central America. The Semitic B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean to South America.
The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher)
Of course there is also the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 as well which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
Don't worry too much about the skeptics. They get a rise knowing you are irritated. Better to use that energy to ignore them. But if you're not going to ignore them, then mock them expose them for their small minds. God bless
@@InfoArtistJK Then again, I find it to be important to address and communicate with the skeptics. I welcome dialogue with them. The frustration is when you are unable to convey a response to them.
@JungleJargon I'm talking about the intellectually dishonest "skeptics", who just get a rise out of the attention you give them. Don't waste "pearls before swine." Peace
@@InfoArtistJK Right.
@JungleJargon I defy you to tell me where our Abos(Oz) came from? They are so otherworldly and unfitted for modern life many suspect they came from outer space.
Sweet
They carbon dated one of the earliest manuscripts of the Quran. Because of its' importance It went to several different labs for testing and their dates varied by several hundreds of years. Carbon dating is not as accurate as people are led to believe.
Scholars will understandably defend their lifetime's work to their last breath and each one has their followers. If a magazine doesn't present and contrast both sides of an issue, the bias becomes visible.
I wish more people will pay attention to this
Yeah, it depends on the sample and human error can really screw it up. You normally get a date range and a percentage certainty from the lab.
The actual result could be dated AD 1200-1350 with 60% certainty but when it's presented it's written 1275 and the +/- 75 years (in this example) often gets overlooked by the audience and the press sometimes leave it out all together.
You do three of those and you can get points all over the board even with a good methodology if the sample is a bit inconsistent
any real references to this story?
@@matswessling6600 "CIRA International" is a YT channel hosted by an ex-Muslim Saudi now Christian. Him and Dr. Jay Smith with his own channel "PfanderFilms" go over the carbon dating and related academic problems there.
Dr. Smith has more real life experience with academic issues. I'm sure if you message him, he can give you the relevant data you're looking for.
The House of David (and Solomon) is most likely J2 M172.
Hi
The ‘Old house’ effect should have been obvious, even from considering WHO it was that usually did the BUILDING in ancient times, that being the KINGS! We can see from the New Testament how that was still the case with Herod the great who was famous for expanding the Temple and building the sea port at Caesarea and the spectacular fortress of Masada!
Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua PRINCE OF PEACE returning soon to fulfil the feast of Tabernacles by reigning over His creation on David’s throne from Jerusalem for the seventh millennium to the glory of God The Father!
Maybe there were TWO Walls. One from Hezekijahs time. The other from the time of king Uzziah.
..."will be quoted for generations to come" is literally my nightmare fuel.
EVERYONE SHOUD SIGN UP FOR ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE'S FREE MAGAZINE!
I am in South Africa and I used to receive The Plain Truth in the mail for many years.
Algorithm sacrifice for the win
Til Gat is a hill that King David fought from in Israel. I worked their on a fruit farm picking fruits. Every spot has some history in it and you can find artifacts all over the ground, going back to King David's time. The bible is real..
How lucky you are! I would love to work there.
Armstrong - Herbert W. Armstrong?
That gaudy gold dome desecrates the world's most holy site. It's a shame it can't be removed.
Scripture is documented history. Atheism is mythology.
Very interesting!
Are you affiliated with The Philadelphia Church of God?
It's so cool--can't fault the Biblical record, you have to calibrate Carbon dating to it! No wonder liars hate Israel.
Actually, there is a Bible Untold course that Alura Cein does on Teachable, I highly recommend it as it reveals the deepest truths and one learns how to decipher the meanings of the texts. King David and King Solomon are not who people think them to be.
Re re skewed article: Shouldn't there be a directory where people can look up a reporter or writer to see their score based on how many times they have to be corrected for falsehoods, misreporting and Bible-bashing? These abusers of truth should not be allowed to hide behind "respectable" publications, because they influence every idiot that reads them.
Tree rings are not accurate. Tree may not grow at all during drought
🤚👍🙏
19:56 verbose.. know what your saying because if you don’t I sure won’t
Read "The Valediction of Moses"; "The Dismembered Bible"; "The Origins of Judaism"; and "Why The Bible Began." All from Jewish scholars - proving the Bible is massively altered - it is not what we've been told folks. The NT is even worse - Paul was found to have been a massive liar - documents in the DSS and found by Eisenman.
I fell for all of that 20 years ago, particularly the Paul stuff. The approaches are very selective in their use of sources and ignore anything that contradicts their thesis. I work with early medieval sources and you can't read them in the same way you'd read a modern source.
In biblical scholarship skeptics (or in some cases, cynics) get away with stuff that would get you laughed out of the room or fired in any other field.
@@sigurdholbarki8268 What did you fall for 20 years ago? The books mentioned are very recent and prove what we have in the "Bible" and "Tanach" just couldn't be real history - plus there are too many major contradictions of fact, history, doctrine, and prophecy expectations. I'm publishing a book now called "Romans Proves Paul Lied".
What's your problem with cow-towns? ;) We love our LORD too you know.
I don't trust carbon dating
why ?
So you found 3000 year old rocks. I bet if you dig further, you will find rocks from millions of years ago.
King David is my dawg!
The bible is the authority not archeology. We have the accurate dates from the bible
😢😂😢😂😢😂
I don't have the time to listen to all the blather about the history. I want the points quick, concise, and to the point. Good bye
This video is a bunch of garbage. It was a small village south of Jerusalem
The history is still wrong though.
Surely, an earthquake is a geological, nor Biblical event? I love the way "Biblical" archaeology co-opts the sciences when they are supportive.
Funny that when an assumption is wrong, it is a bad by archaeology generally, but when it is right it is to the credit of "Biblical" archaeology.
Surely "Biblical Archaeology" is an exercise in confirmation bias? Archaeology is archaeology and cannot dictate what is found..
Obviously you haven't read the Bible and aren't up to date on this subject . It is you that is bias it would seem .
@@CecilSpurlockJr. Thankyou for your contribution, but it doesn't actually address my point at all.
@markaxworthy2508 certainly it does . You're just bias as I've already suggested obviously. Lol .
@@CecilSpurlockJr. Sadly not. Try again:
"Surely "Biblical Archaeology" is an exercise in confirmation bias? Archaeology is archaeology and cannot dictate what is found."
.... If they're using the Bible to find ancient sites as described per the Bible then it continues to confirm it's authenticity in being an accurate document for our archeological records. Whatever nonsense you're on about is just that, nonsense.
So, he gets all excited that Haaretz reports that a wall is not, after all, Biblical, but is not the least bit concerned that the original claim was wrong? Perhaps he should have been a little less accepting and more questioning of the original claim? Or does it get cut special slack in "Biblical" Archaeology because it was deemed to support the Biblical narrative?
Are you having a laugh? Even as an atheist I was appalled at how skeptics could get away with what seemed to be outright dishonesty
@@sigurdholbarki8268 You are unclear. What, specifically, do you mean?
Shalom,
Thank you for presenting this study.
Baruch Hashem!
Am Yisrael chai,
Baruch haba b'shem Adonai!
(Matthew 23:39)
Be well and be Blessed!
A fellow sojourner