0 Brilliant 0 Great 0 Best 0 Excellent 1 Good

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 кві 2024
  • Clip with Ben [04-13-2024]
    If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at karen@atlchessclub.com
    Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable.com/author/BenF...
    Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/finegold.
    Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
    Watch live at / itsbenandkaren
    Donations are appreciated at: streamlabs.com/itsBenandKaren...
    Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
    #benfinegold #chess #subsaturday
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @QuantumHistorian
    @QuantumHistorian 27 днів тому +35

    Hey, at least he didn't blunder!

  • @Alramech
    @Alramech 27 днів тому +23

    The truth hurts.

  • @ircjesselee
    @ircjesselee 27 днів тому +9

    I don't always pre-move three moves, but when I do, it always ends in mate.

    • @iqraathemanuel
      @iqraathemanuel 27 днів тому

      what about a forced three time repetition? I feel like that's more common, especially for gms like Anish Giri

  • @beeble2003
    @beeble2003 27 днів тому +8

    There's good and there's not brilliant and there's not great and there's not best and there's not excellent.

    • @kmarasin
      @kmarasin 26 днів тому +1

      and that's good

  • @zenfire2003
    @zenfire2003 24 дні тому

    First time watching you play. I've only seen you talk us through others games. Very nice. You even premoved the victory. Hope to see more games you play.

  • @Yengi-cw2ox
    @Yengi-cw2ox 27 днів тому +3

    Chess is tough

  • @yotoober1
    @yotoober1 27 днів тому +2

    Seriously, what's going on with the Arbiter and the case of the squeaky shoes at the candidates? We better get Kramnik on the case. 😎👞👞
    "Agent 99, Maxwell Smart here.... calling from the shoe phone.."

  • @patrikholoch7228
    @patrikholoch7228 26 днів тому

    Bens face expression seems like he’s in trouble sometimes, but he’s just in trouble finding the most sexy mate lol

  • @antrossini
    @antrossini 27 днів тому +2

    Never play f3!

  • @kaljatontv
    @kaljatontv 27 днів тому +1

    it was a good game.

  • @mikkelhansen3714
    @mikkelhansen3714 27 днів тому +1

    All book!

  • @SanyaJuutilainen
    @SanyaJuutilainen 27 днів тому +1

    Which move was the good one, f3?

    • @12jswilson
      @12jswilson 26 днів тому +1

      F3 hung checkmate in 3, so it probably wasn't that one. Maybe bxd7+ was okay but he had to play Nxe5+ instead of Nf5+

    • @Matthew-bu7fg
      @Matthew-bu7fg 25 днів тому

      that was a book move... from Ben Finegold's book titled "moves never to play"

  • @antrossini
    @antrossini 27 днів тому

    I'm so confused. Why didn't white take the knight on e2+?

    • @ninck8992
      @ninck8992 27 днів тому +13

      it was double check

    • @askthepizzaguy
      @askthepizzaguy 26 днів тому

      king in check by 2 pieces means its illegal to take the knight and remain in check.

  • @kmarasin
    @kmarasin 26 днів тому

    There's good and there's not good, and that's not good. Even though it's good. Good.

  • @WastrelWay
    @WastrelWay 26 днів тому

    That game made no sense. White moved into check? Those were "pre-moves"? I guess I don't know how online chess works.

    • @JoseAntonio-qu8nk
      @JoseAntonio-qu8nk 24 дні тому

      Yes, those were pre-moves. If you pause the video just before Ben played the first check, you should be able to calculate checkmate in 3 moves. It's just one forced variation and it's the one featured at the end of the game. Nice calculation by Ben.

  • @askthepizzaguy
    @askthepizzaguy 26 днів тому

    1 Gold

  • @JoseAntonio-qu8nk
    @JoseAntonio-qu8nk 24 дні тому

    oof

  • @oliversbored6706
    @oliversbored6706 26 днів тому

    f3 player

  • @douglaslarosa8782
    @douglaslarosa8782 22 дні тому

    I thought that was a life review, not a game review 🫢