Now Su-30 Jets Become to Carry 1,000km Range Supersonic Missile ( Kh-32 Missiles)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Today I’m gonna take you to see the su 30 Jets Become ‘Nuclear Capable’ With Supersonic Kh-32 Missiles. Su-30SM fighters receive new "heavy" air-to-surface missiles. The Russian military plans to modify the Su-30SM to carry the Kh-32 supersonic air-to-surface missile. The Kh-32 missile is believed to have a range of up to 1,000km and can be used against both ships and ground targets.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    Facebook: / themilitary24

КОМЕНТАРІ • 231

  • @dzpower189
    @dzpower189 3 роки тому +53

    Algeria makes a good choice in getting this machine

  • @mmd488
    @mmd488 3 роки тому +28

    Forgot to mention that the engine has thrust vectoring capability as well.

    • @hypmusik
      @hypmusik 3 роки тому

      He mention that

    • @Rebotified
      @Rebotified 3 роки тому

      Always has been...

    • @davidsalcido383
      @davidsalcido383 3 роки тому

      “For sale JSF-35 ‘Slightly used.” Psst:

  • @BBwal
    @BBwal 3 роки тому +6

    Almost all of the Russian fighter have high maneuver ability .Unlike US fighters.

    • @leodickens3202
      @leodickens3202 3 роки тому

      Ok and? Different philosophies regarding fighting.

    • @ivan1kot
      @ivan1kot 2 роки тому

      Different philosophies, both Russian and US jets has its own advantages.

    • @Dr.KarlowTheOctoling
      @Dr.KarlowTheOctoling 2 роки тому

      Except the F-22.

  • @emmanuelubaha5815
    @emmanuelubaha5815 3 роки тому +7

    This is a very good promo for Russia's military aviation industry especially SU30.Many countries seeing this documentary will desire to buy this platform. It's an excellent advert. My question is has sukhoi aviation industry paid for this promo?If not they should do so. They should at least appreciate this excellent work. It's beautiful, completely devoid of propaganda.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      Lol, How this video is not propaganda

    • @mmd488
      @mmd488 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah, according to you all the pilots and Air Force personnel of the countries who bought this aircraft are potato heads. You Sir, are the real Armchair Air Chief.

    • @inlikearefugee5194
      @inlikearefugee5194 3 роки тому

      Yeah you can buy this jet but if you have useless maintenance team, they'll be grounded in no time. And they better be good enough to modify or manufacture the spareparts. Looks like India is doing a good job but don't think other countries are on par.

    • @davidsalcido383
      @davidsalcido383 3 роки тому

      “Probably after checking out the JSF-35 lemon 🍋 Jet with their FB they will go Sukhoi?!” 🔥🐀🔥🦇🔥💀🔥⚰️🔥🔪🔥🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

    • @googleplex1589
      @googleplex1589 2 роки тому

      @@inlikearefugee5194 look a good fighter jet is one thing , but horrible maintenance and bad use and a pilot with a stomach full of vodka is another. so imagine I (person who you don't know) drink a ton of wine and take the f 35 as a pilot . I crash it into the enemy's s 400 ( for instance) . Is that the f 35's fault , or mine ?

  • @jacquesremlinger2044
    @jacquesremlinger2044 3 роки тому +7

    We have to remember that there are two development lines of SU-30, one from Irkutsk and one from Komsomolsk on Amur Plant. They are very different airplanes and they could have different radars, power plants, avionics, weapons etc. For example Su-30 delivered to the China and African countries are Komsomolsk (KnnaPO) airplanes, and in terms of combat capabilities and avionics systems they vary greatly from Irkutsk Su-30 of Indian and Russian Air force. The designation "Su-30" is the only thing that connecting that airplanes.

  • @hazlinabdulhamid7461
    @hazlinabdulhamid7461 3 роки тому +5

    Trends in Engineering & Design..
    Sukhoi Su-30 MKM..
    From Malaysia ✌️😊✌️🇲🇾🇷🇺

  • @hasupe6520
    @hasupe6520 3 роки тому +17

    What are you talking about. Su-30 is not the aircraft that will replace Su-24, its the Su-34 that will replace it. Su-30 is a multi-role fighter, they are not going to replace Su-24, as strike aircraft with a multi-role fighter; that is why they made the Su-34, another strike aircraft.

    • @owenevans83
      @owenevans83 3 роки тому

      @@nicolaasjonkhart4660 do you mean su24? There's over 100 su34s in service.

    • @adibmouhanna6823
      @adibmouhanna6823 2 роки тому

      Su30 is also designed for deep interdiction strike missions

  • @lordabhikingfisher8087
    @lordabhikingfisher8087 3 роки тому +15

    India has already modified SU30 to carry Bhramos. Russia is catching up.

    • @RohitRaj_0911
      @RohitRaj_0911 3 роки тому +6

      Bhai, it's a different class of missile! The Indian varient of Brahmos Supersonic Missile mounted to Su-30 MKI has a range of 150-300Kms , meanwhile KH-32 has a range of 1000mks. India would have to do all the catching up.. or Even should go for the Kh-32. 👍

    • @njegosh1
      @njegosh1 3 роки тому

      If you think that Brahmos is in same category as Kh-32 than you shouldn't leave comments here...

  • @lenkautsugi5747
    @lenkautsugi5747 3 роки тому +8

    Su 30sm is good but su35 is better

    • @googleplex1589
      @googleplex1589 2 роки тому

      Yes right. Therefore they (china) upgraded from SU 30 MKK to Su30 SM3 which adds a more powerful radar also sm2 variant (MKI derivative) has N035 Irbis radar and al 41 engine of the su 35 you mentioned .

  • @foxywinterfox7575
    @foxywinterfox7575 3 роки тому +7

    6:57 it's Mihaly's Su-30SM from Ace Combat 7.

  • @vladimircaeser8284
    @vladimircaeser8284 3 роки тому +3

    Su 30 am aircraft is very powerful and can carry both conventional and nuclear ☢️ warheads

    • @spectre06x
      @spectre06x 3 роки тому

      Yeah, fighter planes have been doing that since the 1950s.

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 3 роки тому

      @@spectre06x You misunderstood him.
      Firstly: The Su-30 can not carry this nuclear missile, Tu-22M3M cary this missile.
      Next: Russian Mig-31 and MiG-29 can carry nuclear missiles (maybe others, I know for these two), which require special electronics to launch. American fighters can carry nuclear bombs, simple free-falling bombs, which most likely do not require special equipment for their use.

  • @TheBattleMaster100
    @TheBattleMaster100 3 роки тому +4

    I thought all SU30's were equipped with cannon, not a machine gun.

  • @ngamlalmuanmuan1209
    @ngamlalmuanmuan1209 3 роки тому +2

    Indian Su30mki already can carry Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles

  • @supremeleader5516
    @supremeleader5516 3 роки тому +22

    I think india should also get this missle on their beautiful beast

    • @stealthtomcat4739
      @stealthtomcat4739 3 роки тому

      It is nothing against a F-22.USAF has the best fighter jets and pilots in the world unlike IAF fighter pilots who crash all the time

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 3 роки тому

      @@stealthtomcat4739 did I asked u anything?

    • @stealthtomcat4739
      @stealthtomcat4739 3 роки тому +1

      @@supremeleader5516 It's You Tube baby not your private home or car

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 3 роки тому

      @@stealthtomcat4739 okay it's your tube not youtube
      Did I asked about f15 or f22?

    • @stealthtomcat4739
      @stealthtomcat4739 3 роки тому

      @@supremeleader5516 No, but people bother me too this way that's what is about UA-cam

  • @siddharthaxX
    @siddharthaxX 3 роки тому +2

    Super Sukhoi!

  • @ucuppsani6767
    @ucuppsani6767 3 роки тому +3

    Bangga Malaysia punya SU30

    • @MrRaise-tu2fj
      @MrRaise-tu2fj 3 роки тому +1

      Jauh datang bangg 😂

    • @inlikearefugee5194
      @inlikearefugee5194 3 роки тому

      SU 30 MKM but doubt whether Malaysia can maintain them.

    • @afiqfiq4201
      @afiqfiq4201 3 роки тому +2

      @@MrRaise-tu2fj hahaha

    • @shinasuka1799
      @shinasuka1799 3 роки тому

      @@inlikearefugee5194 we use it almost 15 years no problem so far 😂

    • @hazlinabdulhamid7461
      @hazlinabdulhamid7461 3 роки тому

      18 Sukhoi Su-30 MKM.. ✌️😊✌️🇲🇾🇷🇺

  • @arminlee1477
    @arminlee1477 3 роки тому +3

    Su-MKI just sounds fucking bad ass.

  • @googleplex1589
    @googleplex1589 2 роки тому +1

    Also the we have to notice the SU-30MKK has a payload extended to 13 or 12 tones

  • @malitiemmanuel1321
    @malitiemmanuel1321 3 роки тому +1

    Every new non-American weapon has nuclear capability! No Wonder the USA complained a lot that this aircraft doesn't fit Ugandan Air force!
    It should be the best at cost to performance ratio!

  • @rajatdani619
    @rajatdani619 3 роки тому +1

    1:55 if it's 5times the speed of sound then it's not supersonic, then it's hypersonic.

  • @speedypete9694
    @speedypete9694 Рік тому

    Starting to doubt everything about the Russian military . If they had what they say they do , this war would be going a lot different

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому +1

    Moje lietadlo sa hralo z lietadlami sami nezistili ne schopné zamieit cieľ 🎯

  • @rudalkontl5931
    @rudalkontl5931 2 роки тому

    SUKHOI SU - 30 SM 2 FLANKER H FIGHTER JET RUSSIA 💪🔥💪🔥

  • @bwayobrian3381
    @bwayobrian3381 2 роки тому

    Thanx for the video can u please tackle the topic of african airforces in depth

  • @meow-cp6cx
    @meow-cp6cx 3 роки тому +1

    Это русский самолёт, он не использует GPS, a ГЛОНАСС.

  • @bobmano66
    @bobmano66 Рік тому

    Russia should keep more Sukhoi's than it sells, also F-35 A's are all cable of carrying US freefall nuclear bombs the same ones kept in storage in most NATO countries. The A model has the appropriate electronics to arm the free fall nuke bomb just like the F-111 could.

  • @mladenrakic1708
    @mladenrakic1708 2 роки тому

    Srbiji bi trebalo jedno 15 kom

  • @kemskyfarezy
    @kemskyfarezy Рік тому

    Indonesia has Su30 too

  • @buddhadevjana4172
    @buddhadevjana4172 3 роки тому +1

    Nice machine work

  • @Ade-mu4zn
    @Ade-mu4zn Рік тому

    🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨👍

  • @ڈیرہ.اعجازی.خان
    @ڈیرہ.اعجازی.خان 3 роки тому

    Soviet Union

  • @hardyanpajero69
    @hardyanpajero69 3 роки тому +1

    👍😎🍺🍩✈️✈️

  • @superwout
    @superwout 3 роки тому

    The jets become to carry? That English be? In the title...

  • @adibmouhanna6823
    @adibmouhanna6823 2 роки тому

    6:37 machine gun?.do you mean 30mm autocannon?

  • @md.saifurrahman6077
    @md.saifurrahman6077 2 роки тому

    Another surprising flanker

  • @pamaran916
    @pamaran916 3 роки тому +1

    ഒന്ന് ഇന്ത്യക്ക് തരുമോ

    • @mmd488
      @mmd488 3 роки тому +1

      നമ്മുടെ കൈയില്‍ already 272 ഉണ്ടല്ലോ ?

    • @pamaran916
      @pamaran916 3 роки тому

      @@mmd488 👍🇮🇳

  • @peter.competer8200
    @peter.competer8200 3 роки тому +3

    Russian military power is the best

  • @atalsingh6572
    @atalsingh6572 3 роки тому

    Tejas mk1a

  • @Swyatogor.7526
    @Swyatogor.7526 3 роки тому

    Attach a 12-meter missile to the SU-30? Are you out of your mind?

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +2

      When Putin says It, You do it

    • @mikiSS91
      @mikiSS91 3 роки тому +1

      @@siouneo152 you will be sent to Gulag if you don't obey Putin the Great...😆

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      @@mikiSS91 😂 😂 😂

    • @RK-ow2dn
      @RK-ow2dn 3 роки тому

      they may reduce size.

  • @swamlinnhtet4679
    @swamlinnhtet4679 3 роки тому

    The same type is accepted in Myanmar

    • @davidsalcido383
      @davidsalcido383 3 роки тому

      “Even War Criminal Myanmar! Huh?! 🔥⚰️🔥🔪🔥🐷🔥💀🔥🖕🔥

  • @agarmajok6825
    @agarmajok6825 3 роки тому

    Sensational

  • @henrysensoy5796
    @henrysensoy5796 3 роки тому

    yeah sure

    • @SwordOfTheSpirit-I-
      @SwordOfTheSpirit-I- 3 роки тому

      What's that suppose to mean?

    • @VASILLEVSKI1878
      @VASILLEVSKI1878 3 роки тому +2

      @@SwordOfTheSpirit-I- He's pissed and can't cope with the fact that Russian military is advancing its equipment lol

    • @SwordOfTheSpirit-I-
      @SwordOfTheSpirit-I- 3 роки тому +1

      @@VASILLEVSKI1878 yeah it sure sounds like he's a hater of progress! 👍

  • @llamudos9809
    @llamudos9809 3 роки тому +3

    Carrying missiles is one thing. Target locking on a stealth jet is something entirely different. The missile could have a 2000km range it would not matter if they cannot lock on the target jet or ship. Meanwhile a stealth jet would would take out a su30 from distance with ease. A T45 destroyer can see 1000 targets at a range of 400km away. The su30 would be toast before it could get a locked. the F-35 for instance would see the su30 and send target lock data to T45 and it would fire a missile and take it out with ease.

    • @RK-ow2dn
      @RK-ow2dn 3 роки тому +1

      su 30 is supersonic jet but f 35 need more time to reach that lock distance
      and also Russians are not fools Su 30 comes with jammer pods like in su 34
      so don't speak about stealth and missile lock only locking on ship is easier then locking an jet
      su 30 pilots known and they also expecting opponent fighters so they also come with fighter escot.

    • @shinasuka1799
      @shinasuka1799 3 роки тому

      Soon enough people will develop full radar to detect stealth fighter that's a fact and that time that big f35 will be easy training target practice

    • @llamudos9809
      @llamudos9809 3 роки тому

      @@RK-ow2dn You do realise that jammers do not work on the METEOR? They will lock on no matter what. These missiles have a no escape zone. Fire and forget missiles. Good luck with the jamming. You seem to think that the f-35 will want to fight at WVR? They won't. They will simply send target data to another system to fire on an enemy jet and carry on with its mission. You could see a b2 loaded with a 100 meteors 400km away from an enemy jet that is target locked. Russians think will be fighting a conventional a2a battle in the future. They won't.

    • @llamudos9809
      @llamudos9809 3 роки тому

      @@shinasuka1799 You do realise its much cheaper to create new stealth coatings and costs less than trying to make a RADAR system to detect Stealth. Its always against the detector. Thats why s400 will get taken out. MALD was invented. SAMs waste their missiles on false positives. Then get hit.

    • @MrDarkpussy
      @MrDarkpussy 2 роки тому +1

      Nothing is certain, unless it happens in real combat not just theories.

  • @deadliftalot
    @deadliftalot 3 роки тому +5

    *F35 left the chat*

  • @templewilliams1982
    @templewilliams1982 3 роки тому +2

    After seeing this I realized that the u.s is lacking in hypersonic missiles

    • @spectre06x
      @spectre06x 3 роки тому +2

      In 1985, a USAF F-15A used a hypersonic air-to-air missile to shoot down a satellite. This remains the only air-to-air kill of a satellite. As it stands, the US is more interested in developing optical weapons. These weapons fire at the speed of light and do not need ballistic vectoring to hit a target. They can kill hypersonic missiles. It's not the US can't produce hypersonic missiles, they would just rather develop a better weapon system.

    • @spectre06x
      @spectre06x 3 роки тому

      @Documents Portal US has been using hypersonic missiles since the early 1980s.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +1

      @@spectre06x you mean US wants to develop better weapons when the technology is clearly too far from our time and their wasting so much money greying to develop it I mean they wasted like billions on a replacement Bradley that didn't work because it uses tech that's literally sci-fi.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      @@spectre06x that's attest and those hypersonic missile never entered service that's why they still don't use hypersonic missiles

    • @spectre06x
      @spectre06x 3 роки тому

      @@siouneo152 Right...I mean THAAD has an intercept speed of Mach 8 and was designed in the 1980's, entered service in 2008, and is just one of several hypesonic missile systems in service with the US...but according to whatever reality you live in, the US doesn't use hypersoic missiles. Sure buddy.

  • @robertosalazar5018
    @robertosalazar5018 3 роки тому +2

    Su-30 failed in the arminian-Azerbaijan war !! The Turkish surface to air missiles and radar jamming devices killed the SU-30

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 3 роки тому +2

      What the hell are you talking about?!
      Russia took part in that conflict as a peacemaker and lost one Mi-24, which the Azerbaijanis shot down by mistake and after which Azerbaijani authorities issued a statement of apology, saying that the shootdown happened by mistake and offered compensation.
      With what kind of shit they feed you?

  • @farmerdave7965
    @farmerdave7965 3 роки тому +3

    F-22 is laughing.

    • @BigBossMan2000
      @BigBossMan2000 3 роки тому +1

      The F-22 can't operate in fog.
      That is a real problem.
      Sukhoi will wreck it.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      Lol F22 is years ahead also there's only about 180 F32 which US can barely afford to keep it operational lol.
      You should take a F22 and put it up against Su30 that's just not fair

    • @BigBossMan2000
      @BigBossMan2000 3 роки тому

      @@siouneo152
      The F-22 still has flying issues.
      Even its radar is not as long range as the Sukhoi jets.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      @@BigBossMan2000 Nag dude, F22A has better radar and the issues were all fixed in 2018

    • @BigBossMan2000
      @BigBossMan2000 3 роки тому

      @@siouneo152
      Suuuuuuuure.
      They claimed that years before and than MORE problems appeared.
      It's a lemon.

  • @UmarFarooq-nl4eq
    @UmarFarooq-nl4eq 3 роки тому +2

    You Know Su-30 Is A Very Capable Aircraft But When It Is In The Hand Of Indian Pilots..They Lose It With Only One AIM-120..!

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +1

      Great, Of course you'll think like that because you're a Pakistani and very bias gainsay India. I'm not from India but just to inform you that your country isn't invincible

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +2

      A quick sanction will Devastate your hole country, Bit you guys are lucky it didn't happen

    • @08abasin
      @08abasin 3 роки тому +5

      @@siouneo152 India would have destroyed Pakistan long time ago but Pakistain is American Israel and English support under cover even I can say Pakistan is not a country it is an American English terrorist trining camp so that’s why India can not attack Pakistan

    • @mahesshnath
      @mahesshnath 3 роки тому

      @@siouneo152 true

    • @mahesshnath
      @mahesshnath 3 роки тому

      @@08abasin very true

  • @Battlenude
    @Battlenude 3 роки тому +2

    I am sorry, but this is BS! The Kinzhal is a smaller, lighter(around 3.5 tons) and newer missile, hense why the larger Mig-31K can carry it.
    The Su-30 can carry Brahmos on its senter hardpoints yes, but it weights(only) 2.5tons.
    If you study the Kh-32 is a humongous large missile at the weight class of 5-6 tons, its also a very old missile design and it will end its service when Tu-22M3 retire. No way you can fit this on a Su-30..
    So yes this is nonsens!

    • @AllThingsCubey
      @AllThingsCubey 3 роки тому +2

      I agree. The dimensions literally don't fit on the centreline of the SU-30 platform, and the weapon is nearly obsolete. Expect nothing but propaganda from Russia. When they called the MiG-31 a "smaller aircraft" I snorted my coffee. It's the largest and heaviest fighter in the world. It's standard take-off weight without ordnance is more than a fully loaded SU-34 bomber, lol.
      No way is the SU-30 getting a 6 ton missile.

    • @Battlenude
      @Battlenude 3 роки тому

      @@AllThingsCubey Yes thank you! God i hate these braindead clickbait flicks about military aviation.. people are clueless.
      The Mig-31 carry over 16tons of fuel internal alone on each mission. No other fighter near the same.

    • @AllThingsCubey
      @AllThingsCubey 3 роки тому +1

      @@Battlenude I was literally just addressing other bullshit about the SU-57 having "L-band radars" in its wings to detect stealth aircraft. Even the company that makes the sensor they're referring to doesn't call it a radar. It's an IFF system like what the F-22 and F-35 have in their wings, but Russian media has spun it into a "stealth killing radar" despite the laws of physics saying that it is incapable of beam forming in 3D for tracking anything.

    • @Battlenude
      @Battlenude 3 роки тому

      @@AllThingsCubey Yes agreed, its IFF interregation system, so that you don't have to use the main radar array for this.

  • @retardmoguss
    @retardmoguss 3 роки тому

    Ey yo bruh 7:28, what is this, ace combat bruh? And well, su-30 is like the minecraft of planes, everyone likes to install mods on their minecraft.

  • @Internetbutthurt
    @Internetbutthurt 3 роки тому

    Hypersonics for everyone who threatens Russia!