Відео

I’d love to talk to you about Limited atonement sometime. I have read a bit of Dave Allen’s book but not all of it. I believe the way I nuance it fits with the Reformers and Synod of Dort view. Most importantly, I think my view fits with Scripture. Feel free to reach out to me anytime. God bless

Calvinism hardens the hearts of those who believe in this false doctrine. It perverts God's nature and makes Him to an instigator of sin. It creates a bunch of self righteous narcissists who think they are better than the rest of the world. It's not only blasphemy, it doesn't make any logical sense. Very sad. Let's celebrate the birth of our Lord and Saviour, who died for each and everyone who accepts His gift. Merry Christmas everyone!

Not a Calvinist fan myself. Folks get a kick out of reciting the tulip points.

You know who you're describing? The mother who birthed Islam, Calvinism, Mormonism - the False Prophet of Revelation, the Roman Catholic Church. Her tentacles extend throughout false Christianity (Jesus and Mary are part of Islam), secret societies, etc. and together they are Mystery Babylon. The true and false Trinities in Revelation: God = the Dragon (Satan) Jesus = the Beast (Vicar of Christ) *The Church = **the False Prophet *Christ's Body, the true Church, prophecies and performs miracles by the Spirit of Christ. **The false "Christ's church" prophecies and performs miracles by the spirit of Antichrist (Our Lady of Fatima, Our Lady of Guadelupe, … Lourdes, etc). Revelation 16:13 KJV And I saw *_three unclean spirits_* like frogs come out of the *_mouth of the dragon,_* and out of the *_mouth of the beast,_* and out of the *_mouth of the false prophet._*

Calvinism is just Christianized Islam.

Could you define what you mean by "meticulous control" and show where Calvinism requires it? By "Calvinism", I mean it as a corporately confessed belief system, not something cherry-picked from one-off authors. I'd be very interested in where one finds that sort of claim in any of the historic Reformed confessions or catechisms. For example, would you have a problem with the Westminster Confession's idea that God ordains all that comes to pass, yet in such a way that he establishes human free will and the liberty and contingency of second causes by what he ordains (3.1)? That there is nothing absolute necessity of man's human nature that determined us to good or evil (9.1)? My concern is that a lot of the things that riles up anti-Calvinists are things that they made up whole cloth and keep perpetuating among themselves without fact-checking, yet have no bearing on the actual confessed beliefs of Reformed denominations. For example, Westminster in the shorter catechism speaks of God's decree in terms of creation and providence (Q 7-9, 11), yet when I see most anti-Calvinists argue against God's decree, they don't deny God as creator and sustainer, or God as King of kings and Lord of lords. Their arguments always seem like they aren't actually aimed at Calvinism, but something else. I often wonder how close they would actually be to Calvinism if they dropped the contrary stance and just made their own positive claims about what scripture teaches.

you have to realize that yhwh is the devil.

where is predestination or fate? here.... But he (Jesus) said, “[I am telling you, Peter, a rooster will not call out today until] you will have [three times] denied [to have known] me.” ... Peter... (A person) saw him... said, “This one also was with him.” But he denied (it), saying, “I do not know him. . . .” . .. Another person who saw] him said, [“You also are one of them.”] But he said, [“Sir, I am not. And after] standing about [an hour some other] was insisting, saying, “This one [absolutely] was with [him; for] he is [also] a Galilaean!” [But Peter said] “Sir, I do not know [what you are talking about.” And instantly,] while he was still speaking, [a rooster] called out. [And] turning, Peter [looked at] it. Then [Peter remembered] the statement [of Jesus when he said] to him, “Before a rooster calls out today you will disown me. . . .”

Ok, too funny, I was going to say you were coming across like Leighton Flowers with an obsession on attacking Calvinism and what do I see when I go to your channel, Flowers Flowers everywhere 😆 cracked me up 🤣. I'll still watch some of your stuff, hope we can talk another time, take care.

Subscriber count is just sitting there at 666! 😆

A funny deterministic riddle is when Jesus said “Israel how I have longed to take you under my wing but you would not.” (🤔 God has a desire that someone do X + God determined that they not do X = God wanted something he would not give himself. 😆)

Under determinism every choice God provides is just a false choice.

Flowers pushes the Calvinist view to a hyper determinism. Not all Calvinist have irrational views of how God determines things. But non Calvinist tend to give man too much credit for what they are actually able to do

And brother. If you are an arminian, you're a brother. Why are you so angry? It seems like you have so much bad experience with Calvinists?

I'm sorry, what's the question again? And which part of the Calvinistic systematic theology is problematic?

Neuroscience proves Calvinism. Benjamin Libet's experiments in the 1980s showed that brain activity indicating a decision occurs before the individual becomes consciously aware of making that decision. This has been interpreted by some as evidence that free will is an illusion, as our subconscious brain makes decisions before we are consciously aware of them.

I don't think you are representing Calvinism accurately. I can't tell if it's intentionally being done or not. You sound hysterical in this video man. If you are a brother in christ I hope you don't take this wrongly. Just one point you might want to study further is the means God uses for his end. For example, you might say, in a calvinistic worldview where God controls everything why would a believer evangelize if God will save with or without evangelists. This is a misunderstanding of the calvinist belief. What you're doing is closing one eye (the use of means) and leaving the other eye open (God completing his end). God tells us to evangelize because that's how he has ordained it to happen. This is just a matter of fact. So when God sends Moses it does not contradict Calvinism. This is how God wanted it to happen so it's going to happen that way. Much more could be said but I hope thus brief defense would open your mind to see this is not a shallow subject you are interacting with

Certainly limited atonement can be biblically proven through Bible verse exegesis. But what if you could see that the Arminian/Provisionist atonement schema was impossible? I mean impossible like you cannot get there from here impossible? Let's use both Bible passages and Bible logic. First, Leighton Flowers himself most definitely believes in limited atonement. Otherwise, he would believe in universal atonement. And there are some Christians, however mixed up, who believe that everyone is saved. Leighton is a limited man on this issue. But let's put this to the test. Pick your favorite OT lost person. Do you like Goliath? Pharoah? Ahab? Jezebel? Any will do. According to Jesus in the NT, where are these folks right now and what are they doing? They are in Hell, experiencing forever the wrath of God against them, having died in their sins, and now paying for their sinfulness throughout eternity. Now back to Jesus. If, say, Ahab is at this very moment experiencing the wrath of God forever and ever for his sins, then how could a just, righteous, and loving God force His wrath upon His Son on the cross 880 years later to pay for Ahab's sins when Ahab has been doing just that already for 880 years before Calvary? To believe that, we have the situation of Christ being crucified again, something really condemned in Hebrews 6. A/Ps love to see Jesus placed in theological double jeopardy as He suffers on the cross. Further, we also run afoul of Isaiah 53 wherein we have the depiction of the suffering servant (Jesus) seeing the travail of His soul and being satisfied. Not dissatisfied. Not worrying about Ahab still suffering for Ahab's sins despite what Jesus would attempt to do for him. And we don't have a truly angry Son of God wondering why the Father is making Him die in vain for someone in Hell forever anyway. Do you see the many problems here? In other words, Isaiah 53 is saying that Jesus is not some kind of masochist who just likes to suffer for sin; instead He suffers for the sins of a particular people, in this case, the elect. And only the elect. A limited (like Leighton and Calvinists would both agree on) albeit large group of people. Jesus prays about this very thing in John 17 when he declines to pray for the world. And our Dear Lord is satisfied in His great work to save these elect people. The people given to Christ by the Father for salvation. Again, John 17. This one teaching from God's word destroys Arminian/Provisionism in one move since we see here from God's word that Christ did not die for everyone. He died for the elect. Have a problem with that? Talk to the judge. That will preach all day. Amen.

Are you implying that God doesnt know Moses’s future? He can get angry at the outcome even if he knows the outcome. He does and anger is not a feeling of “shock” or “unexpectedness”. I get angry every time I see something that pisses me off. Even if I expect it, I can still get angry.

I’m tired of hearing the terms “high Calvinism” or “low Calvinism”. Calvinism is Calvinism. It is a wicked false gospel. There is also no such thing as 4 point Calvinism. If you disagree with one point you disagree with the other 4. All 5 points are in agreement so you can’t pick and choose. You can believe in all points or none but there is no in between.

I feel like Jeremiah 19:5 is the ultimate Calvinism killer. That verse literally cannot happen, does not fit, does not work - of Calvinism is true. And I've never found a Calvinist with a good answer for it.

Weak argument.

So true

calvinism is an abomination to Christianity. it poisons and water-downs Christianity into it is nothing but a feel good religion. it pains me to no end that there are so many lost souls who've truly bought into those lies. I pray for their conversion. I implore all Calvinists to seek history and the apostolic churches and become a real Christian, a true follower of Christ and God Almighty.

Moses was a descendant of Abraham so wasn't he chosen because he was a descendant of Abraham. Also a question, how come in Ephesians it talks about predestination. Aswell as did Jesus die for everyone or those who would worship him? If he died for everyone's sins did he die for the sin of rejecting him?

Wait are you christian or no?

If your still confused you can read the book of Job and pray for understanding while reading. We often read the Bible through our eyes, and while the Bible is for us but it's not about us. This is why we must read the Bible through God's eyes. So while you read, pray for understanding. And continue to read the Bible in its context. I hope this helps.

God is not committing our sins, we are. God, in his mercy has decided not to wipe out all sin and sinners (which is all of mankind) for our sake. If God were to destroy all sin he would start with all of humanity. That's why Jesus Christ came down from heaven to pay the price of our sins, which is death, with his death on the cross. For God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son so that NO ONE WOULD PERISH BUT HAVE ETARNAL LIFE. Sin and death is not the will of God. God's will is for us to be saved. And we can see that through God's actions towards evil. Jesus's death is an example of God's grace, mercy and generosity towards us. Giving us an opportunity we don't deserve to be with the father in heaven.

OK now you just need to comeback to the true faith. The faith that is Pre-Roman Catholic. The Holy Orthodox Church ☦️

You're just arguing that your fairy tale is better than their fairy tale. It's all bullshit

I’ll give you the standard Calvinists response: you don’t understand calvinism, and with that they fix all their theological inconsistencies

Thanks for sharing. I am from Myanmar. Due to the severe crisis in my country, I am currently living in Malaysia as an unrecognized refugee. I am in the process of seeking relocation to a safe country that provides protection and security for individuals in situations like mine. This relocation is crucial for ensuring my safety and well-being amidst the ongoing turmoil. I applied to UNHCR on April 6, 2023, but haven’t received any assistance. I also reached out to my own people and religious organisations in Australia, Malaysia, America, and the UK via messenger and email. Some replied, saying they couldn’t help, others said they would keep me in their prayers, and a few pointed me towards humanitarian organizations. Some even blocked me or didn’t respond at all. Unfortunately, refugees and asylum seekers also face significant discrimination here. The government offers no support-refugees are arrested, mistreated, and barely fed in prison. Those who share the government’s religion receive favourable treatment, while Myanmar refugees endure the worst. One day, a Chinese woman who used to support me called angrily. She told me, "Know your situation," implying that I’m dependent and beneath her. When I share my weaknesses, they use them against me, blaming and scolding me, making my vulnerabilities a way to overpower me. But given my current situation, I can’t share everything I felt. When I do, it became their discrimination. There are four areas where refugees face mistreatment here: from the government, employers, co-workers (all harshly), and even fellow believers (though more subtly). All of this has left me feeling overwhelmed, and if no one helps, I am losing hope. I want to restart my life, build something new, and figure out my dreams.

Now see, no that's not how that works... Free will means we have the choice to sin or not just as we have a choice to repent also fyi, not a Christian just read up on the subject for a handful of years

Reformed=deformed=uninformed

you have a very one sided view of Calvinism. Calvinists do believe in free will to sin. And only with God's grace we are able to turn to Him

And everywhere else in the Bible.

Nice to have you back!!!!

Because God is Super Sovereign cuz muh toolips. WWMS. What Would MacArthur Say.

Explain this… Jesus died for ALL. 2 Peter 2:1, which says, “But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord WHO BOUGHT THEM, and bring on themselves swift destruction

Free choice, it's up to you if you want to do right or wrong. "Warning"

Wow never thought of it like this! You really have to reinterpret 95% of scripture to make Calvinism true.

giggity

What happened to Exodus 20:4. And a question regarding this video "who are 'them' ?"

Could it be that he allowed the magicians to perform said acts, which thus led to Pharaoh’s heart to be hardened, so that God could give such a dramatic deliverance from Egypt (which is later used as a synonym for sin)?

I would take what ever is written in the bible with a grain of salt

Apparently, the author of Exodus didn't know that all things are determined by God in eternity past... 🤷‍♂️

Looking forward to it! Glad you see you safely returned to your family!

Because on reformed theology, you're held accountable for things that are beyond your control and that = justice on that system.