Відео

Thank you! 🫡

Thank you a lot! 😃

Thanks a lot! 😃

Thanks for the advice, I for sure will try to add more of them. Although my main idea behind them is to make people laugh/smile and make my videos more appealing to watch. Also, thanks for your appreciation! I sometimes see people telling me I'm doing Russian or Western propaganda, which I try to stay out of by being as unbiased as I can (besides some of the jokes I make ofc, but I try to make them obviously satire) Thanks for the sub as well :)

@@bobiwt It gave me a good laugh so I'd say it wasn't bad at all. Being a propagandist is very easy nowadays, all you gotta do is throw the facts into the air and some people will do what they do best because they have no love in their life. But anyway, thanks for the comment and I wish you all the best!

@@thecringeinspector5636 Thank you so much! Wish you all the best as well 😃

because t34-85=t34 with 85mm gun. same chassis

Yeah you're right, but that would be the IS-2. In this video, I'm talking about the IS-1 which has an 85mm.

T-44 vid sounds like a great idea. I briefly talked about it in one of the T-54/55 vids but it deserves a video of its own. Thanks for the idea 💪

Gotcha 🫡

🫡

Thanks!

The fuck are you talking about? It's in the east and south you will find most Russian speakers, and this is mostly due to russian resettlement and colonization following Catherine the Great's subjugation of the Crimean Khanate and during the later industrialization of the Donbass. There is also literally TONS of russian slanted media out there, literally at your fingertips. History Legends, Patrick Lancaster, Gonzalo Lira (rip bozo), Col MacGregor, just to name a few. The list is almost endless and their presence even on platforms like UA-cam is basically ubiquitous.

I also think it‘s important to hear the other side of the conflict and I am against censorship of information. I‘m very critical about the conflict myself. But my channel is not about politics and I try to stay unbiased about the vehicles I talk about (besides the jokes I like to make). And facts are just facts mate. It DID destroy Russian tanks. I am not pro Ukraine neither am I pro Russian. Just check out my other videos. Some people say I do Russian propaganda and you say I do Western propaganda. I can‘t be doing both so…

That I tell every Day and so you ask Ukrainian People many think completely different and they know so Rada and Selensky with Poroshenkow complete go and change than the same before, Nobady talking

@@pitmarkovic4545 The Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Eastern Europe. If NATO had just heeded Putins warning that placing a NATO country on his doorstep was "out of the question" when he had disbanded "The Warsaw Pact" decades before then this would not be going on. This is NATO/West aggression pushing Putins limits. (BTW not a Putin fan just giving the other sides take).

This guy has fallen on his head too many times

I was already thinking something‘s wrong with my pronunciation 😂 Thanks for adding this!

Musste diesen Klassiker drin haben :)

Whut? 🤣

Bro is more bias towards the btr4 then 11 year old freeaboos are to the Abrams

@@sparrow9990 who, the creator? he literally said multiple times the vehicle was Widley regarded as inadequate.

Yeah well, at least Iraq eventually resumed the contract and got some of these. Especially because of its different versions and roles I‘m sure the BTR- 4 is needed in Ukraine right now.

You wanted it, you got it :)

Fake vidio

Thank you so much! 😃 I really appreciate the compliment

Thank you!😃

worse than cCenturion, but in evry way is better than M4

Yeah that might be true. But I think its good mobility make up for it to some degree. Also I‘m pretty sure the tactics used for the BMP-3 are different than the ones for fully armored tanks. Maybe more of shoot-and-scoop or „suprise attack“ type of a thing

@@bobiwt in war footage its mostly, oh fuck lead tank gets knocked out, either push through the minefield, or do a 180 in the minefield, either way boom lol

I do get your point, and perhaps you might be right... but I do fulfill the purpose of making this video, which is to present information to you about the BTR-80. What do you think?

@@bobiwt the problem is that due to the nature of wikipedia, the articles often repeat information that was already presented. For example just like the wikipedia article you mentioned that the BTR-80s predesesors where the BTR-60 and BTR-70. In the wikipedia article that is because its first mentioned in the summary at the begining of every wikipedia aticle and then in the design history. In a youtube video you dont even start with a summary, you might start with an overview but the summary is usually the end of the video.

@@phantom3048 Ohh okay now I understand what you mean. From that perspective I see that you‘re right. I will do something about it. Probably combine information from different sources since Wikipedia misses on some information anyways. Aaand I’ll do a complete quality check. Thank you for taking the time to tell me, I really appreciate it.

Absolutely. It's still a big rolling piece of steel with a cannon on it