Відео

Personally think that this advice is for begineers only. I using apsc and i struggle in paid shooting job due to noise when shooting indoor with high iso. Fullframe will perform much better when it comes to shoot high iso.

Aperture priority is my guilty pleasure .. I feel a little sheepish using it, but I really only care about depth of field, and focus .. The camera can handle the shutter speed, I don't mind (On my night hikes, I flip it to manual mode and wind the ISO up because 30 seconds plus is not uncommon) .. I LOVE having my camera with me, but I don't always dig it out of my bag to use it ..

this is true. just because you have inferior gear/device doesn't mean you can't take good photos.

Me with my nokia 7650: “I don’t seem to be improving”

Glad you included the 14mm shots! Using my X-T5 for many things including air-shows and wild-life. 40mp give me more cropping ability for that. Also using it for car-shows and the extra detail from the 40mp shows. An all-rounder.

Not true. A better camera makes everything way easier hell you can just leave it on auto and get some amazing photography out of a Sony A73. It takes way more skill to make good photos with a bad camera.

I’m don’t totally agree, less I more, but it’s depends what you want to achieve has photographer. I like for example to take pictures of urban structures, not building, but structures, and it’s most of the times complex lines and can be full of people or not but still complex and full frame. But I agree that photography should be simple in the sense of not focus on equipment and all that things, but focus more on art and emotion you want to share or record forever in your pictures. Sorry I’m complex even in my comments 😅

Good review and interesting point about camera phones. I have lots of pro gear but increasingly found myself just using a phone on walkabout (less weight) - then found I quite liked the wide angle shots I was taking. So without much info on the full frame equivalent I did a test with a full frame camera with zoom and my phone - turns out the phone is exactly 28mm equivalent. Hence my hunt for an 18mm X mount lens for my XT20. I think I might go for the 18mm / f2

How can u only have 11k subs you deserve 1000x more! Keep going the good work mate 🫡🫡

I love how your videos are so clean and so minimalistic!!!

Love the style of your video!

Only for low-light photography and portrait photography. if not, no one needs the 1.4 because one would like to have everything sharp corner to corner.

really fantastic video- thank you!

I have been shooting RAW, but with film simulations overlayed. I recently figured out that this was causing me to get improper exposure and white balance, but it was only apparent once importing into Capture One. I couldn't figure out why I kept blowing out my highlights until I learned that my highlights were only correct in camera as interpreted by that particular film recipe. TL;DR The RAW file data is not accurately represented in camera when using film recipes that drastically alter the photo's appearance. This can cause users to take pictures with technical issues such as bad exposure, without knowing it.

wow an x100v you can change the lens on. That can't be good.

Great tips, love that you can train your brain to be creative

Great review Andre, thanks much.

Great advice Andre

Not a bad idea. You’d dropped this king 👑

Nice shirt

Waiting for XT5 vs XT4 videos ☺️.. especially ini video side Thank youu

K.i.s.s. keep it simple stupid method

Thats brilliant

This is some fantastic advice. It is simple and practical

Thank you for posting this great video, it is the best sound advice I have heard of in a very long time, 🙂😇

I worked for 10 years shooting for a weekly newspaper, taking the photos, developing film, and then printing the photos in a wet darkroom. I always cropped, in fact the 8x10 paper was too small to fit all information on it. The Nikon school said, the name of the game is to fill the frame. Each photo had to tell a story.

Great lesson, even for life! If you’re not who you wanna be, subtract everything that’s not important.

Nearly all statements regarding the “benefits” of film are BS in my opinion. Digital has many more benefits, when your goal is to take photos. When your goal is “the process” then film is better. However photography is about the end product, not about taking mediocre photos and glorifying them just because they were shot on film.

Who cares what medium you use? Nobody cares about the brushes Rembrand used.

It's like 3 hour movies ..way too long ..too much Like a girl.dressed in beautiful dress compared to.less More is less Less.is more

This is a lens I regret getting rid of. Super sharp, great image quality, and lightweight. I didn't use it much because of the focal length, but when I look back at photos I took with it I miss it.

It wasnt a lot cheaper .. we just didnt spam 300 photos when we went out

I’ve been a professional photographer for nearly 20 years now and your advice is right on point

Looking forward to the X-T4 comparison version!

As a video camera, the X-T5 is probably worse overall than the X-T4 because it has the 42mp sensor and a small, compact body--it only shoots in a 6.2K crop of the sensor in HQ mode and a pixel binned or line skipped 4K.

I wish if it could be a full frame, then I'd not be hesitating to get one for my vintage lenses with their unique bokehs.

Good Video, I have shot over 100,000 photos with my X-T5 and I can not think of a better camera for me. I absolutely Love it. From Family photos to Concerts, To sports, To Portraits To Landscapes..... It is as versatile as my photography is broad. Although I would really like if we could keep this on the DL (down Low) As If everyone realizes how great this is....... It is going to be harder to get than a X100. I plan on shooting the shutter off this thing and want to be able to pick up another body when the wheels fall off of this one. LOL

I had the X100v and I traded it in when I got my X-T5. Love it lots! I have been using it with the 18mm f/1.4 and the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8. Yes I like it wide! Really this was my motivation for trading in my X100v but I do miss the smaller form-factor. Still the X-T5 is solid, works very well, and has become one of my favorite cameras.

Nice video, and thanks for sharing ! I'm running the X-T5 w/ the 27mm 2.8 and it's the best Fuji camera + setup I've ever had. The photos I'm getting are unreal.

A screen like the Sony A7rV maybe?

The XE1 and XT2 are still amazing and will keep on being so till they stop working. It's never the camera!

i use my xt5 for wildlife, so the 40mp and cropping come in handy, even when using my 100-400mm and a tc.

The X-T4 always gave me weird feelings... it feels like it doesn't belong with other X-T cameras... I suspect that the base for the camera was originally the X-H2, but as the X-H1 flopped heavily, they changed the design and renamed it the X-T4. Think about it : X-Trans III having X-T2 / X-H1 X-Trans IV having X-T3 / X-H2 (which would have been the name of the X-T4) X-Trans V having X-T4 (which would have been the name of the X-T5) / X-H3 (which would have been the name of the X-H2) That would have given a proper lineup for both the X-H and X-T cameras, correctly segmented the X-T as photography centric and X-H video centric versions of the same camera (kind of) and would have reduced the number of confused people : the X-T4 took pretty strong steps towards video (flippy screen, larger battery, IBIS) vs the X-T3, and everybody though the X-T line would be the Fuji flagship, that would also be a full hybrid. Then when the X-H2 dropped, a lot of people held off for the X-T5 and were then disspointed when they saw that it was going back to the photo centric body design of the X-T3, complaining that they now have to get a more expensive X-H instead. Properly separating the lines would have been a really nice thing for Fujifilm, that would have avoided a lot of frustration and confusion. Also when it comes to the video spoecs of the X-T5 : basically, it uses a higher resolution, slower reading out sensor than the X-T4. So you have access to 6.2K video (8K is reserved for the X-H2), which takes the same exact sensor area in 4K as it does in 6K, so you get a little crop if you want high detail 4K or 6K video. I think you can do less detailed 4K that is line skipped instead of oversampled, but takes the whole sensor, but don't quote me on that. In the 4K HQ and 6K modes, the rolling shutter is pretty heavy. Works fine for static shots, but you will notice the warping the moment there is a little bit of camera movement. Overall the sensor in the X-T4 is a much better match for video work. Unsurprisingly, that's the sensor that Fujifilm used in the video focused X-S20, which feels like the true successor to the X-T4 when it comes to video specs. The X-T5 is very much a photography camera with some decent video specs, but nowhere near the video workhorse that the X-T4 was and that people were expecting to get. This has sadly been replaced by the much more expensive X-H2S (or the X-S20, but that's a cheaper, smaller body, not really the same kind of rugged camera sa the X-T4 was)

Its time for the xpro 4 ..

It’s great to be reminded about 1% improvement a day, and “treat things like mini projects”. Those ideas speak to me. Another tip I don’t think you mentioned: don’t beat yourself up if you fail at making small iterative improvements all the time. Sometimes, you get tired and and lazy and yah. It happens. When the laziness phase is over, just start up again. Beyond the hard work, I do think there’s some sort of calling that we get from our inner self that pushes us to do stuff and make a mark in the world (doesn’t necessarily have to be a “creative art”).

Have you seen the X-T100’s screen? It’s basically the X-T4 and X100V(I)’s screen combined. Can’t technically do it all, like vertical orientation, but it can do the most. I wish Fuji would implement it again.

I'm not a skilled photographer but to me the lack of an articulating screen can make or break the camera. Recently I've been feeling like getting to try Ricoh GR3 but since I mostly shoot from a low angle (or rather, I typically go "eye level" with the object or slightly lower, which for low objects like plants can be literally millimeters off from the ground level) and with a wide lens, I can't imagine framing my shots with that sort of camera.

The larger file size from the XT5 is a negative for me, 26MP is plenty but Fuji obviously thinks more MP is what sells. I honestly cannot see any major differences in image quality between the XT5 and XT3, but that's just me. I like the size and weight of the XT5 and think its possibly the best value for money Fujifilm camera available today.

I've had my X-T5 since soon after it's release and on one "real" photo centric vacation. Workds pretty good, but to be honest, the autofocus is the weakest point. Some unexplainable misses. Otherwise it's a perfect camera for me!

Really great motivation !