- 102
- 1 301 155
Solving God
Приєднався 16 лют 2018
Solving God One Question at a Time!
15 Teachings About Jesus You’ve Always Believed (But AREN'T Biblical)
Answering The Question: What are some things people teach about Jesus that aren't actually biblical?
----
Are the things you’ve been taught about Jesus actually in the Bible? 🤔 Many popular beliefs-like Jesus being born on December 25th, always having long hair, or never claiming to be God-are actually not found in Scripture. In this video, we’ll debunk 15 of the most widespread misconceptions about Jesus using solid biblical evidence. 📖
🔎 Did any of these surprise you? Let’s dig into the truth together!
----
#SolvingGod #BibleTruth #JesusMyths #Christianity #BiblicalTeaching #JesusIsGod #BiblicalHistory #FalseTeachings #Scripture #Gospel #JesusChrist #BibleStudy #ChristianApologetics #BiblicalTruth #DebunkingMyths #JesusSaves #ChristianDoctrine #JesusFacts #Theology #BiblicalEvidence #Faith #GodsWord #TruthInScripture #BibleExplained #Misconceptions #JesusDebunked
----
Are the things you’ve been taught about Jesus actually in the Bible? 🤔 Many popular beliefs-like Jesus being born on December 25th, always having long hair, or never claiming to be God-are actually not found in Scripture. In this video, we’ll debunk 15 of the most widespread misconceptions about Jesus using solid biblical evidence. 📖
🔎 Did any of these surprise you? Let’s dig into the truth together!
----
#SolvingGod #BibleTruth #JesusMyths #Christianity #BiblicalTeaching #JesusIsGod #BiblicalHistory #FalseTeachings #Scripture #Gospel #JesusChrist #BibleStudy #ChristianApologetics #BiblicalTruth #DebunkingMyths #JesusSaves #ChristianDoctrine #JesusFacts #Theology #BiblicalEvidence #Faith #GodsWord #TruthInScripture #BibleExplained #Misconceptions #JesusDebunked
Переглядів: 3 959
Відео
The Da Vinci Code Lied to You About Jesus-Watch This!
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 години тому
Answering The Question: Is The Da Vinci Code True? What if everything you thought you knew about Jesus was a lie?" Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code shocked the world with its bold claims: Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, the Bible was rewritten to cover it up, and ancient secret societies have hidden the truth for centuries. But is any of it true? In this video, we break down the top myths fro...
Buddha vs. Jesus: 10 Shocking Differences You Never Knew!
Переглядів 1,4 тис.9 годин тому
Answering The Question: Can you please tell me why I should follow Jesus and not Buddha? Imagine standing at the crossroads of two of history's most influential spiritual paths-Buddhism and Christianity. One teaches you to strive endlessly for enlightenment through self-effort, while the other offers salvation freely through grace. In this video, we break down the 10 biggest differences between...
Was Muhammad Ever in the Quran? The Answer May Shock You
Переглядів 37 тис.16 годин тому
Answering The Question: Did Muhammad Ever Exist? The 4 "References" to Muhammad In The Quran Sound Like They Are Talking About Jesus? For centuries, billions have believed in the story of Muhammad as the central figure of Islam. But what if history isn't what we thought? What if the Quran’s references to "the praised one" never actually meant Muhammad? In this shocking deep dive, we analyze the...
Church History: Mary (Devotion, Power and what the Church DOESN'T Want You to Know)
Переглядів 77021 годину тому
This Video Doesn't Answer the Question If You Should Worship Mary or Not, its Only a BRIEF HISTORY OF MARIAN THEOLOGY For over 2,000 years, devotion to Mary has played a central role in Catholic tradition-but was it always just about faith? In this eye-opening video, we uncover how Marian devotion has been used throughout history to achieve political, economic, and religious goals. From the Cou...
Joseph Smith & Mormonism: Corruption, False Prophecies, and Scandals Revealed!
Переглядів 1,6 тис.День тому
Answering The Question: Can you give me an overview of Mormonism and its founder Joseph Smith? The video explores the controversial and scandal-ridden life of Joseph Smith, founder of Mormonism, critically examining his early life, prophecies, and the ethical and financial missteps that shaped his legacy. The script covers key points, including Smith's treasure-hunting scandals, allegations of ...
50 Old Testament Figures Who Secretly Point to Jesus-You Won’t Believe #1!
Переглядів 1,2 тис.14 днів тому
Answering The Question: How do The Old Testament Characters Represent or Point Us To Jesus?? Did you know that dozens of Old Testament figures were actually foreshadowing Jesus Christ? 🤯 From kings and prophets to warriors and outcasts, each of these 50 biblical characters reveal incredible connections to the Messiah! Discover how: ✔️ Melchizedek prefigured Jesus as our eternal High Priest ✔️ ...
10 Biblical Parenting Secrets That Will Change Your Family Forever!
Переглядів 30514 днів тому
Answering The Question: Can You Tell Me What The Bible Says About Parenting? (I Need Help) 10 Biblical Parenting Secrets That Will Change Your Family Forever! Parenting is tough, but the Bible offers life-changing wisdom that can transform the way you raise your children! In this video, we reveal 10 powerful biblical parenting tips that will help you build a loving, faith-filled home. From teac...
Yahweh Vs. Allah PART 2 - What's The Difference
Переглядів 98414 днів тому
Watch: Yahweh Vs. Allah Part 1 Here: ua-cam.com/video/-IuqDT8eXvU/v-deo.html In Yahweh vs. Allah: Part 2, we explore the striking theological differences between the God of the Bible and the God of the Quran. From how they swear oaths to their views on free will, justice, and angelic encounters, these contrasts reveal profound truths about their nature and relationship with humanity. Does Allah...
The Dark Secrets Of Charles Taze Russell and The Jehovah’s Witnesses (FALSE PROPHECIES & SCANDALS)
Переглядів 9 тис.21 день тому
The Dark Secrets of Charles Taze Russell: False Prophecies & Scandals Exposed! Answering The Question: Please tell me about the founder of the Jehovah's Witnesses? Did Charles Taze Russell-the founder of what would become the Jehovah’s Witnesses-truly seek the truth, or was he a master manipulator? This video uncovers his failed prophecies, financial scandals, and legal battles that shaped a mo...
Father Take This Cup From Me (EXPLAINED!) - The 5th Cup Revealed
Переглядів 97621 день тому
The 5th Cup: The Hidden Meaning Behind Jesus' Agony in Gethsemane Answering The Question: If Jesus Is God, Why Did He Ask The Father To Take This Cup Away From Him? Why did Jesus, the perfect Son of God, pray for the cup to pass from Him? What was this "cup" He agonized over in the Garden of Gethsemane? The answer lies in an ancient Jewish tradition-a mysterious "fifth cup" that represents God'...
Jesus Vs Mohammed - Who's The Better Moral Example? (For Your FAMILY)
Переглядів 7 тис.28 днів тому
Answering The Question: Can you tell me what's different between Mohammed and Jesus (Specifically about what they did and taught)? In this video, we explore a thought-provoking comparison between Jesus and Muhammad, examining their teachings, actions, and moral legacies. From Jesus' compassion toward the adulterous woman to Muhammad's endorsement of societal norms like stoning, we dive deep int...
Yahweh Vs. Allah - What’s the DIFFERENCE
Переглядів 31 тис.Місяць тому
Watch Part 2 HERE: m.ua-cam.com/video/FeLNg55OTqA/v-deo.html Answering The Question: Is The Yahweh of the Bible the same as Allah of the Quran? Discover the profound differences between Yahweh, the God of the Bible, and Allah, the deity described in the Qur’an. In this video, we explore five key aspects that distinguish their nature, love, justice, grace, and relationship with humanity. Is God'...
QURAN Borrowed From Gnostic Texts - (8 Surprising Parallels!)
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Місяць тому
Answering The Question: Why Does the Quran sound so much like the heretical Gnostic Texts? Have you ever wondered about the origins of sacred texts? In this video, we explore surprising parallels between the Quran and ancient Gnostic writings. From Jesus speaking as an infant to the miraculous creation of birds from clay, these narratives reveal striking connections that raise profound question...
10 Isaiah Prophecies That Unveil Jesus as the Messiah (Skeptics Debunked!)
Переглядів 2,3 тис.Місяць тому
Answering The Question: What PROPHECIES Did Jesus Fulfill from the Book of Isaiah? Can ancient prophecies prove Jesus is the Messiah? In this video, we uncover 10 powerful predictions from the Book of Isaiah that point directly to Jesus' life and mission. You'll discover: How Isaiah foretold the Virgin Birth. The mysterious "Suffering Servant" prophecy and its undeniable parallels to Jesus' cru...
Is Jesus God? - "My God My God, Why Have Your FORSAKEN Me?" (Hidden Prophecy Revealed)
Переглядів 3,7 тис.Місяць тому
Is Jesus God? - "My God My God, Why Have Your FORSAKEN Me?" (Hidden Prophecy Revealed)
Did Jesus Really Not Know the Day or Hour? Isn't He GOD?
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Місяць тому
Did Jesus Really Not Know the Day or Hour? Isn't He GOD?
Islamic Dilemma - EXPLAINED IN 7 Minutes
Переглядів 3,9 тис.Місяць тому
Islamic Dilemma - EXPLAINED IN 7 Minutes
Quran Stole From Gnostic Gospels? The Stolen Crucifixion Narrative EXPLAINED
Переглядів 3 тис.Місяць тому
Quran Stole From Gnostic Gospels? The Stolen Crucifixion Narrative EXPLAINED
What Does Santa Clause Have To Do With Jesus? The Christmas Story
Переглядів 931Місяць тому
What Does Santa Clause Have To Do With Jesus? The Christmas Story
Every PROPHECY About Jesus' Birth - (6 Minutes)
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Місяць тому
Every PROPHECY About Jesus' Birth - (6 Minutes)
The Story of the Magi - Who Were the 3 Wise Men?
Переглядів 918Місяць тому
The Story of the Magi - Who Were the 3 Wise Men?
The Megiddo Mosaic DISCOVERY - Reveals Jesus Is God (DEBATE OVER)
Переглядів 1,4 тис.Місяць тому
The Megiddo Mosaic DISCOVERY - Reveals Jesus Is God (DEBATE OVER)
The Story Of Christmas - Through Mary's Eyes
Переглядів 485Місяць тому
The Story Of Christmas - Through Mary's Eyes
Was Jesus ACTUALLY Born December 25th? - Everything You Need To Know!
Переглядів 2,2 тис.2 місяці тому
Was Jesus ACTUALLY Born December 25th? - Everything You Need To Know!
Is Christmas A MYTH? - 10 Things You NEED To Know!
Переглядів 1 тис.2 місяці тому
Is Christmas A MYTH? - 10 Things You NEED To Know!
Is Christmas PAGAN? And Should YOU Celebrate It?
Переглядів 2,5 тис.2 місяці тому
Is Christmas PAGAN? And Should YOU Celebrate It?
Is The Pope Infallible? - EVERYTHING You Need To Know (In 8 minutes)
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
Is The Pope Infallible? - EVERYTHING You Need To Know (In 8 minutes)
The Angel Of The Lord: The ENTIRE Story (EXPLAINED IN 9 minutes)
Переглядів 3,5 тис.2 місяці тому
The Angel Of The Lord: The ENTIRE Story (EXPLAINED IN 9 minutes)
The ENTIRE Story Of The HOLY SPIRIT: From Genesis To Revelation (EXPLAINED IN 11 Minutes)
Переглядів 6 тис.2 місяці тому
The ENTIRE Story Of The HOLY SPIRIT: From Genesis To Revelation (EXPLAINED IN 11 Minutes)
Self-confidence means, trusting in one's abilities, qualities, and judgement. So a self-confident person depend on his own understanding. But the wisdom in below Verses says, do not depend on your own understanding but depend on God with your whole heart: *_Proverbs 3:5_* *_International Standard Version_* _5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart,_ _and do not depend on your own_ _understanding._ *Hence being self-confident makes us unwise.* May *God* remove all the self-confidence of us all. And give us faith in him and understanding of his instructions and its appropriate discretion, Amen. *_Proverbs 19:11_* *_King James Version_* _11 The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and it is his glory to pass over a transgression._ *_Proverbs 29:11_* *_International Standard Version_* _11 The fool vents all his feelings,_ _but the wise person keeps them to himself._
The DaVinci Code is fiction and was always labeled as such. If you think it was trying to convince people of an alternate understanding of Jesus, you're an idiot.
Impersonal like the Science religion that can't quantify personality starting with Science.
The Thumbnail spells Quran as Quaran. Please correct the error 🙏
@1:08 «…which suggests a warmer season…» - why do you think so? Check the wheater in other places in the North, where «shepherds were watching their flocks at nights» durong summers with temperatures you find in the Palestlne in the coldest season. So that argument is invalid. The Bible simply does not say the month and day of Jesus's birth. Period.
In the European way of thinking, December 25th is a cold, windy day with snow, but in Judea, December 25th is just a little chilly, between 8 and 14 degrees Celsius. In addition, the period from December to February is the time of the year when the grass grows long in the pastures and there is plenty of water for the sheep to drink, making it a good time to go out and graze. During this good time, shepherds take their sheep out to the distant pastures and feed them to fatten them up. And a few months later, during the Passover of the month of Nisan, they can offer up the unblemished lambs born at this time as sacrifices. Our common sense often betrays us.
Jesus was born on Tekufah Tivet. A day which doesn’t always land on the Roman Calendars December 25, but does most times. Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law is not by means of replacing sacrificial laws. The giving of his Life to God fulfilled God’s wrath, and where our cups fall short in our INNER fulfillment of the ACTUAL LAW (Love) Jesus fills in the rest by our faith. Jesus’ Law cuts way deeper than the Moral Mosaic Law.
Jesus did preach in hades. 1 Peter 4:6 For this is why the gospel was preached even to those who are dead, that though judged in the flesh the way people are, they might live in the spirit the way God does.
Amen! Thanks for the video! 📖🔎📖
The Jewish Bible does NOT say that it is wrong for men to have long hair. Yes, #4 is one that christians reallllllllllllllllly need to find the right way to understand. Concerning #6. John 8:58 completely destroys this idea. IF #10 is true, then John 14:6 is total NONSENSE. Only the Good News Bible translation DARES to turn the word WINE into grape juice. The #1 error that people think about the Messiah is that He came to start a NEW religion!!!!!!!!!
The reason people depict Jesus‘s long hair is because Jesus was called the Nazarene. Not because of some European influence like this biased commentator stated
May *God* remove all the self-confidence of us all. And give us faith in him and understanding of his instructions and its appropriate discretion, Amen: *_Proverbs 3:5_* *_International Standard Version_* _5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart,_ _and do not depend on your own_ _understanding._ *_Proverbs 19:11_* *_King James Version_* _11 The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and it is his glory to pass over a transgression._ *_Proverbs 29:11_* *_International Standard Version_* _11 The fool vents all his feelings,_ _but the wise person keeps them to himself._
Protestantism bullshit
Do you not know that any accusations you make to the Da Minci Code like Forgery, Unreliable, etc is two way. Which means you and your video could also be accused as same.
I'm unsubscribing: This one shows what his all doctrines are. Trinity is not biblical and not 3 person in one God. One God came to us in three forms. He is the Father, He is the Son, He is the Holy Spirit.
Sorry but the sceptics usually say that the Gospel of John is sus because he only seems to claim to be God in that account, but here is what we can respond with, psalms 110:1 The lord said to my lord sit at my right hand. Jesus says in Luke 22:69 the son of man will sit at the right hand of power of God. Daniel 7:13-14 I saw the Son of man coming with the clouds of heaven and Heaven he came to the ancient of days and to him was given dominion and glory kingdom, that people of all nations and languages should serve him forever, Mark 14:62 they ask are you the Chist and he says I am and you shall see the son of man sitting on the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven
I don't think anyone really thinks Jesus turned water into grape juice.
I don't understand why people think that Jesus went to hell for that time. The thought of this is ridiculous. The demons are scared to death of Him. As if the demons could ever touch, let alone torment Him wherever He is. No.. Jesus would have had them all hiding in the corners.
Jesús was not tormented when he went to hell he took the keys of hell
@IsaiahDelarivaNavarro well many people believe that He was. Including my husband when we first got married. He said that's what his pastor taught. He was so sure about it I started crying bc I couldn't fathom something like that. Of course I hadn't read the Bible for myself at that point. He no longer believes that but doesn't know why his pastor taught it.
What is the Gospel. This is a 7 part series , each video is about 3-4 minutes, it is worth watching. And maybe you could do a video concerning this content. ua-cam.com/play/PL6633489290EACF6B.html&si=5JnRv0vk2qepuPDg Thank you.
Friday evening prayer, strict ban on pork, circumcision for boys, headscarf for girls, white round cap for men, clothes above the ankle, halal/kosher food processing, men and women separated in the house of prayer... What's there not to understand? These are mandatory rules strictly imposed on all Muslims no matter where in the world, and yet, these rules are nowhere to be found in the Qrn. It's because all these rules are written in the Mishna. Jews. They are Jews, the people who wrote and thise who follow the Qran. Of course they would constantly talk about Moses and Abraham. And they reject Jesus as the son of God but accept him as the last great Jewish prophet. Shabat shalom to all Muslims in the chat!
you should change your depiction of Jesus to have short hair!!
AI Overview Learn more The Greek word adelphoi (\(\delta \varepsilon \lambda \varphi \omicron \)) is a plural noun that means "brothers" or "brothers and sisters". It can also refer to people who are not biological relatives. Meaning Biological brothers: In the New Testament, adelphoi is often used to refer to male siblings. Spiritual kinship: In the New Testament, adelphoi can also refer to Christ-followers, emphasizing the unity and equality of believers. Close relationships: Adelphoi can also be used metaphorically to describe close relationships, such as fellow countrymen or members of a religious community.
This is not likely as the passage clearly refers to them as biological siblings, not as mere friends. Mary and Joseph would have had children after Jesus birth, as families were usually larger back then. This doesn't contradict anything in the Bible and is the most historically accurate.
I was expecting one of them to be “Jesus said God hates the sin but loves the sinner.”
Bro I love your content genuinely i love your videos I've watched some multiple times and even share them with friends and acquaintances alike they are a wonderful tool for spreading the word. But the first fact it wasn't brought up and kind of brushed over but mathematically we got Dec 25th from when John the Baptist was conceived and working from that point to the nativity. Saturnalia is from like the 15-17th if I'm not mistaken not the 25th or the 6th the other possible date worked out. Please don't take me at my word look into these things there is nothing pagan about the nativity only later traditions of men. God bless and thank you for taking the time to read this. Sincerely
BALONEY, on a few points. HE DECLARED GRACE ON HUMANITY, Christianity or not, LONG before the word was uttered by the apostles. Mt. 12:31-32, denial is blasphemy. Mk. 3:28, corroborated. Lk. 12:10?. And if Jesus was NOT dead 3 days and nights, 9 previous passages make him a liar. Any going to hades or anywhere else is AFTER QUICKENED by the spirit, AFTER RESURRECTION. Resurrection of the dead is a basic tenant of Christianity. Let's not make Christianity bogus, or Jesus a liar by ANY IDEA, Jesus was ALIVE when dead! SATAN SAYS the dead live, NONE LIVE IN DEATH. Jesus was dead, until his own prophecy of resurrection.
It's fiction unless....
Your presentation is well-structured and engaging, demonstrating a strong commitment to biblical accuracy. However, it leans heavily on sola scriptura, assuming that all Christian beliefs and traditions require explicit biblical proof. This approach often carries the risk of presentism-the mistake of interpreting historical events and theological claims through modern expectations rather than their original context. Many aspects of Christian practice-including feast days and theological formulations-have been shaped by historical tradition, theological reasoning, and ecclesiastical decisions, rather than direct scriptural mandates. While we will set this methodological concern aside, a broader perspective would provide a more historically and theologically comprehensive discussion. Your argument that December 25 was chosen due to pagan influence overlooks its theological foundation. The early Church selected this date based on the March 25 Annunciation, linked to Jesus’ conception, crucifixion, and the creation of the world. Early theologians, including Tertullian, Hippolytus, and Augustine, held that Jesus was conceived on the same date He would later die-March 25-following the belief that significant prophetic figures completed their lives in full-year cycles. Since this placed His birth nine months later, December 25 followed naturally. This calculation predates the 274 AD establishment of Sol Invictus, countering claims that Christmas merely replaced a pagan festival. More importantly, Christian feast days, like Easter and Pentecost, were designated based on liturgical and theological considerations, not biblical mandates. Your argument that Jesus had short hair, based on 1 Corinthians 11:14, assumes Greco-Roman grooming norms applied universally. However, Jewish men, particularly teachers, often had shoulder-length hair and beards, as seen in the Synagogue of Dura-Europos (3rd century AD). The Nazarite vow (Numbers 6:5) required uncut hair, demonstrating that long hair was not inherently disgraceful. Since Scripture does not specify Jesus’ appearance, assuming short hair remains speculative. Your discussion of Jesus’ temperament rightly rejects the idea of Him being solely gentle and soft-spoken, highlighting His righteous anger and authoritative rebukes. He overturned tables in Matthew 21:12-13, called the Pharisees a “brood of vipers” in Matthew 23:33, and used a whip to drive out money changers in John 2:15. However, His mission was not political revolution but a kingdom “not of this world” (John 18:36), balancing confrontation with humility and self-sacrifice. Your treatment of Jesus and the Law (Matthew 5:17-18) is accurate but requires clarification. He fulfilled the sacrificial system (Hebrews 10:1-10), making temple sacrifices unnecessary, while moral principles remain binding (e.g., love your neighbor). Ceremonial and civil laws (dietary and purity laws) are widely seen as fulfilled and no longer obligatory (Acts 10:9-16, Galatians 3:24-25). Recognizing that different Christian traditions interpret this fulfillment differently would provide a more nuanced view. Your position on Jesus’ siblings is thought-provoking but requires further nuance. The Greek word adelphoi (Matthew 13:55-56) typically means brothers, but in biblical and historical contexts, it can also refer to extended kin, including cousins or close relatives. In first-century Jewish culture, the distinction between biological siblings and extended family was not always explicit in language. Catholic and Orthodox traditions, based on early Church writings, hold that these adelphoi were either cousins (following the Aramaic tradition, where no specific word for cousin existed) or Joseph’s children from a previous marriage, supporting the doctrine of Mary’s perpetual virginity-a belief attested in early Christian writings such as those of St. Jerome, Origen, and later Church Fathers. Protestant traditions, emerging in later centuries with a preference for a strictly literal interpretation, often take adelphoi to mean biological siblings, arguing that Mary had other children after Jesus. However, this interpretation contradicts early Church tradition, which was widely upheld by both Eastern and Western Christianity for centuries. While the Bible does not explicitly clarify the exact nature of these relationships, historical and linguistic evidence leans toward adelphoi being understood in a broader kinship sense, rather than necessarily implying biological siblings. The argument that Jesus turned water into grape juice rather than wine lacks biblical and historical support. John 2:1-11 explicitly states that Jesus turned water into wine (oinos), the common Greek word for fermented drink. The master of the banquet even comments that the wine Jesus provided was superior to the earlier wine, indicating both quality and fermentation. Ancient Jewish culture used wine regularly in religious feasts, weddings, and daily meals. The claim that this was non-alcoholic grape juice is an anachronistic interpretation, often promoted by groups with modern temperance concerns. However, fermentation was the natural state of stored grape juice in antiquity, as refrigeration and pasteurization did not exist. Even 1 Timothy 5:23, where Paul advises Timothy to drink a little wine for his health, affirms the common use of real wine in biblical times. The miracle at Cana was about abundance and transformation, symbolizing the new covenant and the messianic joy foretold in the Old Testament (Isaiah 25:6, Amos 9:13-14). To downplay the actual nature of the wine risks distorting the message of the event. Your case for Jesus’ divinity is on point but needs to expanded. In John 10:30, He declares, “I and the Father are one.” In John 8:58, He invokes Exodus 3:14 with “Before Abraham was, I AM.” John 20:28 records Thomas calling Him “My Lord and my God,” which Jesus affirms. While some skeptics argue that Jesus never explicitly said, "I am God", this misunderstands the Jewish context in which divine identity was expressed. This expectation is an example of presentism in theological discourse-it assumes that Jesus, teaching within a first-century Jewish framework, would have expressed Himself in a way that conforms to modern Western clarity and direct speech, rather than in the culturally and religiously nuanced way that His contemporaries would have understood. In Jewish thought, God's name (YHWH) was so sacred that it was never spoken aloud, and divine identity was revealed through actions, scriptural allusions, and claims to authority over sacred laws. Instead of making a blunt declaration, Jesus demonstrated His divinity through His words and deeds, forgiving sins (Mark 2:5-7), accepting worship (Matthew 28:9, John 20:28), and declaring His unity with the Father (John 10:30). His audience understood these claims, which is why the religious leaders accused Him of blasphemy (John 5:18, John 10:33) and sought to stone Him. A direct statement saying "I am God" would not have been more effective and would have been theologically unnatural in Jewish discourse. Your discussion of Jesus' descent into the dead could be refined. Luke 23:43 ("Today you will be with me in Paradise") indicates He did not descend into torment. 1 Peter 3:19 states He “proclaimed to the spirits in prison,” which suggests an active mission in Sheol (Hades), not Hell. Revelation 1:18 confirms His authority over death, reinforcing that His descent was a declaration of victory, not suffering. Your point that Jesus’ death was intentional is well-supported. Isaiah 53:10 states, “It was the Lord’s will to crush him.” John 10:18 affirms, “No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord.” The crucifixion was not an accident but a fulfillment of prophecy. Your argument for a bodily resurrection is well-substantiated. In Luke 24:39, Jesus says, “Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones.” John 20:27 records Him inviting Thomas to touch His wounds. Christian traditions do not require explicit biblical proof to be valid. Many foundational doctrines-such as the Trinity, the dual nature of Christ, and the formulation of the Nicene Creed-were developed through Church councils, theological reflection, and historical tradition, not through proof-texting isolated verses. The same applies to feast days like Christmas, Easter, and Pentecost, which the Church established for liturgical and theological reasons, not because they were biblically mandated. By applying a historically informed perspective, rather than a literalist, proof-texting approach, one gains a clearer understanding of how Christian theology developed organically from both scriptural foundations and the lived faith of the early Church. Addressing these aspects would offer a fuller, historically grounded understanding of Christ and Christian tradition.
dude...
Sola Scriptura is true, assuming that scripture is not defined as only the Bible. Scripture is anything from that is inspired by God, and proven with evidence. Anything that goes against the known truths of scripture cannot be counted as true. Councils and discussions could only decide what fits into the known truth given by God, and which texts were from reputable sources. Some traditions are wrong, and cannot be counted as truth, while others may be true. The one thing that is for sure is that traditions cannot contradict the scriptures, and new traditions made by the church have far less authority than the proven scriptures.
@@Matteo-1 Your perspective on sola scriptura is interesting, especially in defining “scripture” as anything inspired by God and proven with evidence. But who determines what is “proven,” and by what authority is something recognized as inspired? This is a fundamental issue for sola scriptura, as the canon of scripture was not self-evident-it was recognized and formalized by the Church through councils and theological consensus. If councils merely identified “known truth,” then an authoritative body must have existed to recognize and define it-which challenges the idea that scripture alone is the final authority. Since the canon was debated for centuries, an external authority-whether the Church or tradition-was essential in establishing it. If scripture alone were sufficient, how did early Christians determine which books belonged in it before the canon was settled? Your point that traditions cannot contradict scripture is valid, but this assumes a universally agreed interpretation. Yet, Christian history is filled with doctrinal disputes over issues like the Eucharist, baptism, and justification, even among those holding to sola scriptura. If scripture were self-explanatory, why have such debates persisted? You also argue that Church traditions have less authority than scripture, but how do we determine which traditions are valid? Key doctrines-such as the Trinity, Christ’s dual nature, and even the canon itself-were clarified through councils and tradition, not explicit proof-texts. Rejecting post-biblical tradition risks undermining essential Christian beliefs that were preserved and articulated by the early Church. Scripture and tradition were never meant to be rivals-scripture emerged within a believing community that preserved and applied it. The real question isn’t whether tradition adds to scripture, but whether it serves as a faithful and authoritative interpretation of divine revelation. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to see scripture, tradition, and the Church’s authority as working together rather than standing alone?
@@wabisabi6248 Who defines what is prooven? Well the gospels came from eye witnesses and disciples that Jesus taught directly, so Jesus words are obviously true. Paul was also changed by God, and was given more things to add to scripture, which can be proven by the miracles he performed and the endorsment of the disciples, as well as the fact that he added to and didn't contradict scripture. The Biblical canon debates consisted of obvious problems, such as heretical or false books, not written by their claimed author, or contradictory to the other prooved texts, and then which verified and inspired books should be in the final version. While some books may be true, they may be mainly historical and add nothing necessary to the gospel or scripture, just repeating things. These books are verified and are scripture, but aren't canon. The Bible is made of infallible texts, compiled by a fallible group of people. They cannot change the truth or which books are true, but merely find obvious falseties, and compile necessary books. God's words are kept by the Holy Spirit, not by tradition, as humans make mistakes. Sola Scriptura has no problem with debating ideas. Just because we don't always understand and may disagree on minor things doesn't mean that the scripture alone is not enough. Our interpretations may fail, but the truth stands in the word, and sometimes what is passed down as tradition may be false. Just because certain ideas such as the Trinity or Christ's dual nature were clarrified and put into simple terms by the church doesn't mean that scripture didn't already have those truths. If we decided that Jesus is not God based on our findings, then that tradition is still not more true than the original text. I understand your point, and I agree to an extent. "Tradition" as understanding of scipture and truth that is passed down is important to help us learn and work together for God's Kingdom. However, tradition as the Church, especially Catholic Church with the Pope, choosing and writing into law interpretations is problematic, as humans make mistakes, and the church is made up of humans, who may interpret wrongly. For example, the Peter was a leader of the early church, and in Galatians 2, we see him acting contrary to the truth and making Gentiles become like Jews. If he was the original Pope, then his mistake being kept as a tradition could have lead everyone astray. I think that in the end, scripture is obvious when examined, and false scripture or something that isn't verified can be easily found and ignored. This scripture is truth and while tradition may help our understanding, giving it too much power can lead small mistakes to become big problems. We all understand small things differently, but the gospel and salvation truths are the only thing that truly matter, as true faith overides small customs and ideas. The Catholic Church let any Pope write into law what was tradition, leading to indulgences and murder of apostates being tradition. Thanks for the worthwhile and respectful debate. We share the same faith, so any arguments, whoever is wrong, it doesn't hurt our salvation. May we find the truth together.
7 is ridiculous. You literally condemned the apostles creed which is highly regarded by all the churches. Also what do you think God meant by paying the debt of sin? The only way to do that is an eternity in hell.
who cares about anything that has not come from the word of God. It literally says TODAY you will be in PARADISE. Paradise referring to the garden of eden.
@@emanrn except youre going off the assumption that perception of time for god is equal to perception of time for man, we literally learn that time is different for God in scripture, plus youre telling me thousands of early church fathers wouldve missed something so obvious? No! Whats actually obvious is that youre interpretation of the scriptures is far enough from the church fathers (who were much closer to the actual apostles) interpretation of scripture that you end up blatantly contradicting them. You also profess the nicene creed every time you attend church, its a creed that is binding on all christians like scripture, so youre asserted view of the bible here where everything else is irrelevant contradicts all trinitarian accepting christians throughout history.
@@metalvenger2 look fam, if its between human tradition and human teaching, human culture, my own pre-existing ideologies. vs the word of God, its gone have to be the Word. Each and every single time. God is not the author of confusion. He gives prudence to the simple. Jesus did not rely on “church fathers” we have one Father. Call no man father or master. Jesus hadn’t even ascended yet and your taking things out of context. Jesus spent 40 days in the desert which were 40 days the same way u and i experience 40 days. anything other would diminish him, what he did, and what he had to suffer through. and u dont know me homie. I do not identify with human thought only the Word because once you start identifying with these confused religions or “denominations” of which there are thousands (proving it is confusion aka babylon) then once the Bible contradicts your beliefs, your heart starts deceiving you and coming up with ways to make the both coexist but you cannot serve 2 masters.
Jesus suffering and death on the cross was Jesus taking the punishment for sin on Himself, and being separted from the Father, as is the cost of sin. Then He said "it is finished" and died. He went to Hades, the realm of the dead, the place of waiting for dead souls. It is Hades, sometimes called Hell, but it isn't the lake of fire. Jesus probably went to bring back the believing souls of the dead and declare victory over the demons awaiting their fate. God is apart from time, so for all we know, Jesus being detatched from the Father could have been eternity of Hell.
Jesus had to be God so He could pay the eternal debt. also 'it is finished'
Excellent! Thank you!
May God bless you and help you make more useful videos like this! This is not meant as a hate comment in any kind of way. I just wanted to point out that maybe you shouldn’t use that animation of Jesus since you also know He didn’t have long hair.😇
You know what you are doing! God keep you from these devils!
There is only ONE Devil.
The 4th commandment is remember the Sabbath & keep it holy so yes I would say God wants us to rest on the 7th day just as he did, nowhere does he tell us to go to a temple built with hands
James was son of Clopas, brother of Joseph, and he was older than Jesus, so saying they were siblings denies the virgin birth.
Joseph was previously married.
@BobbyMaler-fy6wh yes, according to several sources
False just a Catholic tradition not true
Bible does not say that those were Mary's children. James, for example, was son of Clopas, brother of Joseph.
Jesus never claims to be god, fact. He is clear however that he is at one with the old testament god and that he was with god from the beginning. He also refers to god as his father.
Even though everything you are, you've done and said is obvious that you are a human, because you've literally not said "I am a human", you are not a human. Seriously? But if you say "I'm a carrot.", even though everything you are, you've done and said is obvious that you are a human...you think you are actually a carrot?
only 1 God. only God is worthy of worship. Jesus accepts worship on multiple occasions.
in john 8:5-8 the pharisees were trying to trick Jesus to deny the Law. but He just went and drew on the dirt. how does this connect? He was indirectly saying that He wrote the Law. and the Law was 'written by the finger of God.' (exodus 31:18) so He does claim to be God.
@@emanrn There is no scripture that says that the son of god is not worthy of worship. There is no scripture where Jesus is being worshipped as god.
@@gekota3xyz Sorry but I can't take someone who quotes from a passage that most modern biblical scholars agree was added centuries after John was written, seriously. Learn more, do better.
December 25th is the day Jesus birth is celebrated, not the day he is believed to have been born.
Muhammad (ﷺ) is mentioned in the Quran multiple times, but Allah honored him by addressing him with titles instead of calling him by name. His name appears 4 times, and 'Ahmad' once, but he is referred to countless times as 'Prophet,' 'Messenger,' 'Muzzammil,' and 'Muddathir.' Allah says in Surah An-Nur (24:63): 'Do not call the Messenger as you call one another.' This proves that not mentioning his name often is a sign of respect, not insignificance. After hearing your first claim, I already knew how weak the rest of your video would be. I’m done with your nonsense."
MHMD is a Messianic Divine Title for the Messiah. MHMD Jesus!
"Jesus was a gentle pacifist!" Me, looking in the Gospel of Matthew, where Jesus fashioned a whip, flipped tables and chased money changers out of the Temple courtyard: Are you sure about that?
Um did you watch the video?
@@eddieboggs8306 Not all of it, no. But no, Jesus was not a gentle pacifist, as Solving God states
@@voltekthecyborg7898 He took a bunch of cords and made a whip and whipped the money changers in the temple. No he wasn't.
@ Exactly.
@@eddieboggs8306 Jesus did not whip the money changers, that is a common misconception, Jesus only used the whip to drive out the sheep the oxen and other animals that were in the temple, Jesus NEVER used physical force against anyone.
What is amazing about criticizing Islamic beliefs and denies the existence of prophet Muhammad (PUH), they forget that between Christianity and Islam is about 600 years, so Islam came after Christianity whereby many generations vanished and most people became unbelievers neither in Moses (Jews) nor in Jesus (Christians), Islam came to prove that there was Jews and Christians and told Muslims that Moses, Jesus and other prophets existed, So, if you deny Muhammad and Quran , how did Muslims knew that Jesus was the son of virgin Marry and ever existed, You deny Islam then you deny all other religions and Thora and Bible
You have the Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN) and the you have Islamic History. As Muhammad Hijab and Yasir Qadhi points out there is HOLES in the Standard Islamic Narritive. Then because minion are not to know these things they had to damage control.
Hey Seeker, you're a liar!! Your presentation is Copy Pasted, from your " scholars", who got whipped over and over, until they have settled, that, scientific miracles in your quran, " has been debunked";( Ali Dawah),and ," The standard narrative, has holes in it".( Yasir Qadi)! So abdul, take the fake and go bake in the lake! Your allah has 1 leg to stand on, and needs help! ( Q 47 v 7).
Was this suppose to be in a reply.
The shroud of Turin shows Jesus with long hair along with his laceration.
Which is why it's false
Unfortunately, the Shroud of Turin is a fabrication. However, our faith is not in the Shroud of Turin, we're not the Shrouders of Turin. We're Christians: our faith is in Christ dying and resurrecting on the 3rd day for our sins.
@@MeMe-qc6ow Jesus would not have looked like a 15th century European either. Mary and Joseph were married. They had sex too. Mathew 1:25.
Bible does not say those brothers and sisters were Mary's children. Church Fathers named their actual parents.
@@fantasia55 Are they the same ones that claim that there were three Wise Men? Even gave them names. No where does it say how many wise men . Joseph and Mary were married so they had sex. Read Mathew 1:25.
Amen
The Christian church which is the Catholic Church existed 400 years before the Bible, the new testament are the first generation writing of Bishops whom were Apostles. The book of John is a record of Jesus telling the Apostles peace be with you as the father sends me so I send you. Then he breathed on them and said, receive the holy Spirit, who's sins you forgive are forgiven who's sins you retain are retained. He also told them to to baptize. Paul ordained Timothy and Titus and thus they received the authority to baptize and forgive sins in the name of the Church, also hey teach in the name of the Church. This person and his video is a lie, mixed with multiple ommisions of historical facts
Thank you and God bless you and also myself and my family may we continue to benefit from His Grace, Mercies and Forgiveness and forever be saved in paradise...
I cried. It's so beautiful. Jesus is God, rock, high priest, saviour, King, shepherd, deliverer, Redeemer of Mankind.
Of cours3 h3 never was.. all the perverts of the world united and fo4m3d a party..creat3d a manifesto and wrote th3ms3lves a book ..tha was all!!
The Trinitarian doctrine is the no. 1 biggest lie ever invented
It is very much appreciated please.
It is very much appreciated please.
It is very much appreciated please.