Відео

So right 😂

@@bencmaster hmmm. Not as easy as I thought. 4 Bank array. Sequencial relays. A little programming on a raspberry pi. Two pods per plane. About $2100 per plane. Ouch.

No I don't think it does.

@@bencmaster I thought the sucking pressure pushes your tongue to the roof of your mouth?

Well I have tried the usual array of Amazon 'fixes' which don't fix! For me the whole journey has aggravated my insomnia simply because the snoring worry inhibits sleep, if not in a separate bedroom.Its a huge issue, if you let it. The one thing that helped for a while was the dentist fitted Mandibular Advancement device. Unfortunately it only stopped the one snore area behind the tongue (and then only partly). It then decided to self destruct, which is an evident choke risk. In addition, any messing with the mandibular joint inevitably creates issues, pain being the most immediately obvious. I accept that its just my experience but homo sapiens is essentially similarly designed.

We have the Inspire device in the US which I just learned about. It’s an implant that sends a signal to your throat to open it up. Search for it on a search engine.

"Stimulates the Vegas nerve" -- that's a joke. It's just a buzzer that goes off in your ear and wakes you up. Don't waste your time and money. I'm still trying to get my money back.

Well Bill Koleno and John Williams made a serious start on one at the Titan factory. This was to have an Allison V12. I think the development costs were probably the main problem there. But generally, the EAA / UK LAA mentality caters towards the affordable. Sure there are mavericks out there too, maybe more in the USA. If you go full size, there are a number of things that get way bigger than the extra 25% scale and it remains a replica. Cost to build, running costs, hangarage, and of course the size of the hole in the ground if you get it wrong. Im sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. Marcel Jurca (french homebuilt genius) produced a full sized Spitfire which is lovely to look at. Not sure if he designed a full scale Mustang. Lastly, the shortage of suitable V12s is a huge problem. A Chevvy LS3 V8, tuned to the max, may not be a very satisfying power plant.

@@bencmaster I'm a sheet metal guy...I own a small factory..I produce ..ventilation equipment....this is what I say about programming production costs ...it takes the same labor...to build a 8 ft hood as a 10 ft or 12 ft hood (identical labor cost for all three). Tie up of the same machines...however because of "volume buying of metal"...it's actually less cost to build the 12 ft hood ...If ...if.. you build in production cells of 3 to 5..units..example...if I buy 5000 lbs of 304 stainless 4 b finish the price is $ 390.00 per sheet x 50 sheets...if I buy 10,000 lbs of stainless...the cost is...$250.00 per sheet...x 100 sheets...production costs get much better. great for the bottom line..Secondly ....because there is no guns ...self sealing tanks...armor...bomb shackle s...no antique radio equipment...we shave at least 2500 lbs from the airframe..minimal...thirdly... Ford triton V 10s are sitting every where... can produce 760 hp easily .without breaking a sweat..and my c a l c s say 290 mph at 10,000 AGL for a cruise.. speed....I state ...if your gonna produce Mustangs...let's keep true to the reputation of the Mustangs of days past.....I figure at 1.4 mil per copy they will sell...because your getting a full size REAL FEEL D model MUSTANG...built just as good as they were in 1944...45...

I think it might take time to get used to keeping the lips closed around the mouthpiece but you could tape for sure.

Im in the same boat as you... Many times me or wife crash on couch cause of snoring

I looked into the implant, it sounded really expensive and not everybody can have it either. Depends on the cause of the snoring. I would love one. I hate wearing a cpap.

We all set these up differently Larry. Just running through what may be obvious to you... The factors are: What we consider max rpm to be on an aircraft application with the Honda and the T51's Airpseed limitations. In my case I set max rpm to a conservative 5000 rpm. (Obviously the Honda could handle more.). Airframe limitations are set for us by the UK's LAA. However the relevant bit, gear and flaps down (take off in this example) is 87 kts or 100mph, which was originally offered by the designers (John W) at Titan. IF you set max rpm higher you will get an even steeper climb out; it is already quite STEEP! Should the motor quit, as happened in NZ with a T51 powered by a Wankel rotary and the climb out is extreme, you'd have trouble getting the nose down for a glide, quick enough. Lastly, the governor on the T51 was originally selected for smaller HP engines and should be working comfortably within its designed range, which it is on this installation. There is no question in my mind that Honda has more than enough power for the aircraft. The wing and probably prop design are the eventual limiting factors in getting higher speeds. For me, the sweet spot is 165 mph with 3750 rpm cruise. At that speed the canopy starts to whistle which is more reliable than any ASI. You also get a pretty good cruise fuel burn at 40 litres/hr.