Відео

None of this is Japanese Jujutsu. Japanese jujutsu is a weapons based/weapons retention art. But, I agree that it can benefit from modern training pedology. However, 99% of what people this think Japanese jujutsu is, is just goshinjutsu which is a self defense art. This video is a good example of goshinjutsu. Nothing wrong with that, just not Japanese jujutsu.

Boom

Very good!

Sanda rules are safe and fun. Sambo stand up and k1 are similar..body armour and head guard are good for the throws so can land on each other with some safety factor 😊

Hello summer time :D Feeling the 40 degrees sensation caused by the infernal sphere of fire shining upon the metal construct which is this Judo gym XD Let the fun times begin, sauna style XD

Can't wait for the video with yesterday's footage. It's one of the rare times I'm mostly satisfied with my camera work.

the hair ties though ur still horrible at cudiling (marko alt acc)

Tremendous video. Interesting point about the hesitant/mini tap tap at 9:57... it has to do with the mentality of good sportsmanship/ Jita-Kyoei... these taps happen all the time in practice. Often times the competitive winner abandons that mentality and adopts an all together different mentality - break, crush, and kill.

The fights were very good, just like good ol' Freddy in the background.

Ljubi majka ❤👏💪

Good break down

Nice step by step analysis😎

You can use tour own arm in place of his

The punches seem slow, like you're not really doing full contact. You sure it was sparring?

Good!

👏👏👏

i know nothing. what's a slicer?

chi is real that's where Chi- Na comes from

martial art isn't a sport competition

I hardly go a round with the purple belts without getting calf sliced from nowhere.😂😂😂

Morote-gari, Kata-guruma, Ippon-seoi-nage, Uchi-mata. . . Just some that I can see XD Some people will call what we do here, violence XD This was a fun day at the beach and so many highlights from 20 minutes of footage :D

Kako vam je tu zdravo i lijepo trenirat e👏👏💙

Good stuff good place to practice we used to practice alot of forms footwork and sparring on the sand , really good idea. I swim in the sea most weeks all year for training maybe see if u can try jujitsu at the beach every month of the year 👍

Dana does not like speedos

How many of these Techniques can you name? Leave it down below👇

I'd focus on something quantifiable. None of the fake dude will allow you to test them, so its a waste of your time

Good luck getting any of them to agree. I would love to see it but so far, every defender of woo I’ve asked, has made up excuses not to

Needs more views, you outdid yourself this time!🎉🎉🎉

Honestly no I'm just not interested at all cuz its not rly useful and it's gonna turn into a love island discussion

F*ck the debating with modern wizards, boys lets go grapple on a beach and throw big rocks in da sea together like real brothers do 💪

Good tai chi is science. Its a shame there are fakes and frauds but the same can be said in any business . There is good and bad in everything, positive and negative, for me that means accepting and just focusing on myself rather than others . That old saying, we can lead a horse to water but we can't make it drink . People that are that way inclined will be followers, there is alot of people like it hence religions have done so well . Another strength of tai chi is its a well needed alternative to abrahamic religion .

Surely proof of Chi being effectively used is when you apply it on a non compliant person effectively, not arguing about its effectiveness in a debate, easily proved or disproved it really isn’t a debate.

I think, since you seem to have good critical thinking and can handle a civilized debate, it could be interesting. But it also depend on your interlocutor, you need to find someone openminded and honnest enough.

It seems that people throughout history just want to argue with each other. Here is an example, my God is better than your God and if you look more closely it is the same God but with just a different name XD

I was sceptical, so actually attend one of his workshops. Hes good at Tai Chi but not a particularly nice person, hes very arrogant. Hes no magican, just very good at manipulating people (in a Derren Brown way).

Something I've always found interesting about the whole Chi/Ki discussion is how so many people seem to have the "objective, fact-based" view on it, yet it seems like no one has deep-dived the history of the concept. I have a video in some state of completion somewhere where I go into autistic detail on it. I think the reason I shelved the premise was mostly because the whole thing could be boiled down to "Chi means whatever it needs to mean in a given place or time." I think it was around 2020 when I picked up a book called "A Study of Qi: In Classical Texts" by Elisabeth Rochat de la Vallée. Even in ancient times, the meaning changed drastically. There are a few other articles around the Internet, too. Lance Gatling has one called "Ki 気 in Jūdō 柔道- Uchida Ryōhei and the Secrets of Budō 武道極意" on his Kano Chronicles blog. I'm sure Sangenkai Blog, Aikido Journal, and Guillaume Erard blog all have stuff on Ki and Aiki in its relationship to Aikido and Daito-ryu. Beyond that, the blog "Kung Fu Tea" is a pretty excellent academic-adjacent resource for the Chinese Martial Arts and I'd wager it also has stuff on Qi. The WordPress site Brennan Translation is also a repository for many, many Chinese Martial Arts classics translated into simple English--of course, complete with mentions of Qi. Including the first book, this crash course in Qi would cost most people a whopping 12-15 USD assuming "A Study of Qi" is available for you. If you omit that book, all this is completely free (assuming Internet access). The painful reality is that most people just either don't know how to do due diligence on these ideas or--if we are going to be more cynical--really don't want to. Not to mention this is the tip of the iceberg, I can only imagine how much more study opens up with command of Japanese and Chinese languages. For what its worth, I do think that Qi/Ki are a "real thing," but what they mean is extremely dependent on the specific context. Through all my reading its only been very modern practitioners that suggest its a woo-woo superpower. It seems to me that most practitioners in the past were discussing a very real, observable physical phenomenon, which they were just describing in shorthand. Sometimes this is as mundance as twisting at the hips or something. Unfortunately, the term now is mostly used by people who seem to be looking for religion rather than martial competence. And I don't mean that insultingly, either. If people want to incorporate this stuff into some kind of new age faith and they aren't harming anyone--power to them. But using this term in a way that requires so much raw belief and so little evidence while selling it as a genuine martial tool is con-artistry at its apex. I suspect that eventually Qi/Ki was used to deliberately hide concepts in the 20th century. I think it probably refers to different things depending on the system you are practicing. But, speaking more frankly, in 2025 I don't think there is any reason a teacher shouldn't be able to explain what it is in their system in plain English. Its the information age--no secret stays secret for long. If your teacher can't, that is a problem in my mind. It either means they don't understand their own system or they are deliberately keeping the term "mystical" so it can mean whatever it needs to in order to sell a product. Qi/Ki is genuinely an interesting rabbit hole I'd suggest any practitioner go down at some point. But I've never found any conclusive evidence in the historical record or in my training to suggest it a "secret sauce." It's still worth knowing about, though, so you can ask good questions when the term comes up. As an aside, the concept of Qi used to mostly describe phenomenon in the physical word, namely through Daoist cosmology. While Daoism's proposed architecture for reality is obviously dated today, a serious study of Qi will reveal how freakishly far ahead of its time it was. Daoism was proposing things eerily close to atoms and dark matter and the like as far back as the 6th century BC. That has little to do with martial arts, but a bit wild to think about.

Bruce Lee had the glow. 💡

You forgot to mention that actual HME instructors also couldn't tell the difference. 😂😂😂

😂😂😂

master eel ecurb approves this message

The past when tai chi was reasonable 😂😂