Відео

Hey, Die Spikes haben nur auf einer Seite die Aufnahme für ein Innen-Sechskant-Schlüssel. Würde man die Spitze Seite nach oben zeigen lassen wollen könnte man diese nicht fest genug anziehen...

Update: das GX500 gibts gerade auch für 1680€. Ist der Preis nun angemessener?

Hey, sry für die späte Antwort... Die Frage ist ob dir das Rad ansonsten gut gefällt und ob die von mir genannten Nachteile auch für dich gegen das Rad sprechen. Ich würde das Rad so nur empfehlen, wenn man keine Änderungen daran vornehmen möchte und nicht groß Upgrade will (Da das daran nur sehr eingeschränkt möglich ist und die Kompatibilität schlecht ist.) Ansonsten fallen mir nur marken ein von denen ich grundsätzlich viel halte und weiß das sie von Fachhändlern geschätzt sind ohne aber genau ins Detail gehen zu können. Zudem sind viele dieser Räder neu etwas über 2000€, gebraucht ist sonst natürlich auch eine Möglichkeit. Diese sind dann zwar natürlich nicht neu aber so wie es der Fahrradbranche momentan geht, sind womöglich höhenwertigere Komponenten Verbaut!. Diese sind z.B. Bombtrack (Modell: Hook bzw. Hook EXT), Kona (ROVE LTD), Salsa (Fargo), Tout Terrain (Vasco GT 28) oder von der Marke Patria (Tribos). Die Modelle sind nur Vorschläge, schau dir gerne alle Bikes dieser Marken an. Wichtig ist m.M.n. hydraulische Scheibenbremsen! Ich hoffe ich kann dir damit immer noch helfen, oder hast du bereits bei dem Angebot zugeschnappt? Cheers!

@@josefarnold2873 Das ist durchaus ein angemessenerer Preis für das Rad. Ich finde es aber auch wichtig zu sagen, dass der Online Markt nach und nach durch die so günstigen Preise die kleinen Fachhändler den Gar ausmacht und viele nach dem Kauf merken: "Oh ich habe das Rad zwar zu einem günstigeren Preis bekommen, ABER ich habe nicht die Vorteile die ich gehabt hätte, hätte ich das Rad bei einem lokalen Händler gekauft" (Ansprechpartner bei Reklamationen oder Fehlern, schneller Termine für Reparaturen, womöglich eine Kostengünstigere oder gar kostenlose Erstinspektion und weiteres mehr! Das ist durchaus was Wert und manche Händler lehnen Reparaturen an Fremdräder sogar ganz ab, was nachvollziehbar ist, da Sie diesen Preiskampf nicht gewinnen können!

@@jeremyw.465 bei einem preisvorteil von 700€ ist das risiko bei einem biobike überschbar.

Hey, jeder mit einem 40mm Schraubenabstand, ich selbst nutze den "Comp 40"" von Pletscher.

@@jeremyw.465 danke

Heute ist das GX500 mit versand für 1700€ eingetroffen und gleich den flex40 von Hebi verbaut was doch einiges an nacharbeit am Ständer erforderte. Da in dem Ständer eingestanzte Gewinde waren die mit der Flex entfernt werden mußten, danach stieß der Ständer an die Bremsscheibe was mit biegen beseitigt wurde. Jetzt steht es dauerhaft fest. Der Pletscher Ständer hat an meinen E-Bike nach einigen Kilometern angefanfen des Todes zu Klappern. Meine Freundin grinst auf dem GX500 im Kreis und ist hoch erfreut. Hat aber ausserhalb vom Geschäft noch keine Gravel erfahrung.

Hey, ich verstehe nicht so ganz deine Aussage mit der passendes Kadenz eines 1x12 Antriebs und dem Gewicht... Zum Eigenaufbau: Das Problem ist ja, dass der Rahmen nicht einzeln erhältlich ist. An sich wäre das super da er ja zudem eine Aufnahme für ein Schaltzug für den Umwerfer bietet und man somit auch einfach einen 2-fach Antrieb anbauen könnte. Ich verstehe dich so, dass man sich für gutes Geld ein anderes Rad aufbauen kann? Dem stimme ich zu!

Hey, I always first attache the Mount for the Ortlieb Fork Pack first and then the SKS Speedrocker mudguard without any problem. The other way around should also be possible, but I recommend to first attache the mounts in order to know where to place the clamps of the mudguard. I also use 3 screws to attache the mounts to my fork and I attache the lower clamp of the Speedrocker below and the upper clamp above the mounts. The only adjustment I have to make is on the left side of the fork I take the C-clips off in order to route the break hose a bit differently otherwise it is a bit in the way of the clamps of the mudguard. I hope that is of help, Cheers!

@@jeremyw.465I installed both yesterday on my bike. Kind of a problem is that the upper screw of the bracket covers ideal position of the front part of that fender. It hovers 3-4 cm above the tyre. The back part would be ok, as you can shorten the rods with a saw. But not much I can do about the front part. Bit unfortunate but still ok. Thanks for your reply!

Hey @@bekahride That is truly unfortunate... It may be that the tree screw on your fork sit higher up and therefor there isn't enough room for the upper attachment of the Mudguard... In my video about the VSF GX-500 (ua-cam.com/video/s04uGKNunsY/v-deo.html) in minute 09:16 you can see how it is possible there and in my video about Gravel Upgrades Part 1. (ua-cam.com/video/IILg8BD10pw/v-deo.html) in minute 01:40 you can see how much room I have left above the third screw.

@@jeremyw.465Just watched your videos and yeah it's a bit unfortunate but still works with my 40 mm tyres on a Ghost Asket in XL. It's more like 3 cm clearance which still looks acceptable. Btw saw in October SKS will release a XL version of speedrockers for up to 52 mm tyres.

Ryde rims are the tanks of rims. They are nearly undestroyable and the DP19 is probably in production for over 20 years when the company was still called Alesa or Rigida. You probalby can run them tubeless but of course not officially. They are very cost effective and easy to build. I've done over 25.000km on Ryde Sputnik rims (19-622) with no loss and i'm way above 150kg of weight. Tubless is also a fad for many use cases as you must renew the sealant regularly, probably 2-3 times a year. That's a PITA for newbies and the will not do it until the have a puncture and the sealant fails during a ride. It's not user friendly.

Most steel bikes in the past had no routing for dynamo cables. I have bikes from Patria, Utopia, Razea and even a Bakfiets. They all use zip ties for th dynamo cable and not a single one broke. It looks cheap but it works. The pain points for lighning cable are in the back, either when conflicting with seat stays and racks or when routed inside the rear fenders.

Hey, those are the SKS Speedrocker Mudguards, they officially only work for up to 42mm wide tires, but I use them on 45mm ones and they still work great! Cheers!

True but the trailer weighs a lot more than the pannier bags and that’s why it does make a difference ;)

I wouldn't say It is better in any way... Can you tell me anything that is better?

Thank you for you're positive commend :) Cheers!

If you go on their website on "Mounts" and then onto "Cycle", you'll find the Out Front Mount and the Pro Version. Click on them and under "1. Select a mount / Pick a mount" choose the you want. I hope that helps ;)

Hey, yes those are the Ritschey Venturemax WCS handlebars. You can watch my video about the updates I made on my gravel bike here where I talk a bit about what I like about them: ua-cam.com/video/xv3KE5-CZXg/v-deo.html 01:11

Yes it is waterproof 👍

@@jeremyw.465 Thanks!

Hey, the clamping as you said yourself is exactly the problem with carbon. Carbon is very weak when it comes to punctual force and easily breaks. That's why you might break it if you clamp it and load it up...

Hey, ich habe eine Innenbeinlänge von 81cm bei 175cm Körpergröße und fahre die 54cm Version, von daher kann dir die 56cm Version durchaus passen. 54cm sollte dir aber auch passen und dann würde ich es abhängig davon machen wie du gerne fährst. Möchtest du Touren machen und ein stabiles Fahrgefühl haben, dann würde ich dir die 56cm Version empfehlen. Möchtest du aber viel auf single Trails fahren und wendiger unterwegs sein, so ist die 54cm Version besser. Am besten kannst du beide abwechselnd fahren und dich dann entscheiden. Sonst kann man aber euch durch das Wechseln des Vorbaus oder Lenkers etwas am Lenkverhalten ändern, jedoch nicht an der Länge des Radstandes... Viel Erfolg!

@@jeremyw.465 Danke für die Infos!

@@jeremyw.465 Ich habe heute die 54 und die 56 direkt vergleichen können und mich letztlich für die 56 entschieden. Das passt irgendwie alles. 😃

@@tfsgrk Das freut mich, viel Spaß wünsche ich dir!

@@jeremyw.465 Hi! Ich möchte an dieser Stelle gerne ein kleines Update geben: Die Größe 56 passt richtig gut, das Fahrrad ist auch angenehm leicht. Leider hatte ich bisher nicht die Möglichkeit, mehr als nur ein paar Meter damit zu fahren. 😬

I can totally understand you, the mudguard is not the most useful, true... The SKS Speedrocker are a good option, they have clearance up to 42mm but I use them on 45mm wide tyres and that also works.

I am glad my video was of help, have fun with it! Cheers!

„ Again, the short answer is yes. There is no rule against it. But it is recommended that you avoid using 'one' as an object because you might sound too formal or too unnatural.“ Link: langeek.co/en/grammar/course/177/one-vs-you#

Du hast dahingehend recht das es nicht sehr persönlich ist und daher versuche ich es bei „you“ zu belassen ;)

Yes, and where did you bought it. i was looking at ridewrap

@@io2k7 The foil is from Easy Frame, the extended version.

Hey, very good question! I will ask and come back to you but I can imagine that that is not recommended because it might well weaken the mounting points. That's why Ortlieb offers a mudguard themselves! Cheers!

Hey, I couldn’t find it on the crozier website which surprised me but I found it on this one: bobparts.com/bob-fork-yak-28-black/ I hope that helps!

@@jeremyw.465 I saw that but it is out of stock. Seems since they went out of business it is hard to find those. Thanks

I use the "Comp 40mm" from Pletscher.

*With an additional rubber at the bottom

True...

they're removable

Thank you for letting me know! I appreciate that, cheers!

Ah haste am Anfang gesagt, sorry.😅

Hi, ich war in der Berufsschule in Breisach (BaWü).

Hey, at the moment I am making a video about the MULE and the 20" wheel really makes a difference! After having testet it for some time now I find that the perfect trailer for touring is the mix of the MULE and the BOB. I will write you the exact measurements as soon as I find time :) Cheers!

So I measured it and the measurements of 62x40 are actually wrong, I should have measured it myself! The Platform has an oval shape and whilst the length is actually 62cm it is only 40cm wide at the widest point! At the bottom it is only 35,5cm wide, then slowly goes to 40 and then at the top it rounds up. But as you can see 01:43 that it does fit a box of bear, maybe mine was a different size…

​@@jeremyw.465 Hey, thanks a bunch for the effort. So what you're saying is the sides slant outwards as they go up, and the base platform isn't actually 40cm wide between the sides? That's extremely disappointing and makes for yet another trailer that loses much of its utility because of a few missing centimeters. I can see it fits a crate of beer lengthwise just fine, but I had hoped that I could fit a crate of beer or water sideways at the back and then put another grocery bag in front of it, instead of putting the crate lengthwise and taking up basically the entire trailer. Looking forward to your Mule review (even though it seems like yet another trailer that's a little bit too awkwardly shaped to carry basic standard sized boxes and crates). It's like these trailers are all designed to fit precisely the bag that's sold with them, and not very much else. I don't know what's so difficult about building a single wheel trailer whose platform is actually 60x40cm.

@@Turbobuttes yes that is exactly the case with the BOB. Whilst it is sad that they haven’t got the measurements you are looking for they are designed for touring and therefore probably they did try to fit their bags as precisely as possible instead of trying to make it fit such boxes, but yes, if they are close to those measurements why not make it a few centimetres wider… Well does it have to be a single wheel trailer? The Burley Flatbed or Nomad might have the right size?

Hey Mewek, sadly I don't know of any other affordable solution. I can only think of the alloy version of the Tailfin which still costs very much, but sadly the only other option is getting a different bike. There are also racks that you can attach to only your seat post but if its carbon that won't work either and even if it were possible (with an aluminum one) they can't carry much weight (about 10kg), look in my opinion very bad and when you cycle whilst standing up, they tend to want to move sideways and possibly scratch your seat post and might not hold on tightly because the lever is so long. I hope I was of help, cheers!

@@jeremyw.465 Thank you for the reply! I had a quick conversation with ChatGPT and it seems that the Ortlieb Quick Rack is the cheapest rack that is capable of carrying 15+ kg and fits carbon bikes with dropout eyelets only, Tailfin and Old Man Mountain being two other options which are more expensive. Therefore, the rack is ordered and I'll treat it's quick remove feature as a bonus ;)

@@mewek hey Mewek, I might have misunderstood you, I thought you didn’t have any eyelets at all… do you mean you don’t have eyelets on the upper part of your seat stays, but you have some lower down at the dropouts? Because then you can easily screw in the „FRAME MOUNT PIVOT BEARING M5 or M6“ and install the rack onto them and to your saddle post. But in that case you could also buy a different seat post clamp which offers such eyelets to which you could install any rack (because you said you don’t actually need the ability to take the rack off). If you don’t know what I mean I can send you some links. In case you don‘t have these eyelets at the drop outs there are the seat stay adapters from Ortlieb. But these are not compatible to carbon frames!!!

Hey Robert, thank you for your nice comment! I am not sure how to understand your question about me trying out my old wheels with other tyres correctly. I didn't try out other tyres because for me it was clear I wanted to upgrade both wheels and only then I decided to also change the tyres ;) Why do you only get 44mm when mounting a 45mm tyre on your (19-21mm) rims? I am now swaping to 35mm Schwalbe G-One R tyres. The handlebar is great and if you change your rims or wheel I can only recommend also adding a hub dynamo ;) Cheers!

Hi, I haven't been using it lately but instead the Ergon SR Allroad Core Pro Men in M/L. I still use the Brooks B17 on longer multi day rides on which it still is my favorite choice but honestly I haven't done s trip in a long time and so it has been sitting in my seller for quiet some time now... :( Cheers!