Mongrel Motorsports
Mongrel Motorsports
  • 147
  • 795 535

Відео

Rant: stupid classic car mods everyone thinks they have to do.
Переглядів 40 тис.Місяць тому
This video is mostly for fun, but with a bit of education. Ready to suffer the disdain from viewers! Edit: some folks seem to struggle with comprehension and think I'm saying drum brakes and points are superior to disc brakes and FACTORY efi. Not the case. Fan shrouds are ALWAYS better, but not always necessary. And...Sniper EFI is just an electronic carb/throttle body injection. OEM port EFI i...
1960s-1970s Ford Steering Boxes - a basic introduction
Переглядів 97Місяць тому
A look at 1960s-1970s Ford steering boxes and their problems. StangersSite for steering box decoder, rebuild services, full explanation of what is needed to rebuild a Ford box, power steering components and much more: www.stangerssite.com/steeringboxtagdecoder.html
1966 Ford Falcon Part 36 - Time To Drive!
Переглядів 3902 місяці тому
Testing out the V8 and hearing the exhaust. Steering wheel details. Fixing the alternator I damaged.
7" LED or H4 headlamp conversion for 1/4 the price of Retrobrights!
Переглядів 4022 місяці тому
Get them while you can...won't take long for Toyota to discover the secret is out. Toyota part number 81110-60P70 This should work in any car with 7" round sealed beam 12v lamps. I've heard they will work on motorcycles also but may require modification to mount not confirmed. To my knowledge and that of the internet wizards who found this hack, there are no kits for square or quad lamp setups,...
1966 Ford Falcon Part 35 - dead alternators, new steering wheel, and it drives
Переглядів 1423 місяці тому
I spend days trying to figure out why it's not charging, only to realize I caused the problem. New replacement steering wheel = love it or hate it? Teething problems, but on the road at last.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 34 - Noise, Smoke and Pipes
Переглядів 1654 місяці тому
Does it finally run? After several false starts, yes, but not without some remaining problems.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 33 - The Final Connections
Переглядів 1344 місяці тому
Fixing the oil pan problem, running wires, making linkages and lines.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 32 - Making Excuses
Переглядів 2945 місяців тому
More V8 swap hand wringing. Throttle linkage, exhaust, ignition.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 31 - V8 install and all the problems that go with it
Переглядів 5597 місяців тому
We finally get the small block sitting in the engine bay and begin to attach all the connections.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 31 - Removing the six, wiper motor fix, accelerator pedal removal
Переглядів 3278 місяців тому
In this video I remove the tired 200 six. Illustrate the differences in the engine mounts and throttle linkage. Fix the previously broken wiper motor. Show you how the throttle pedal comes apart and goes together (it's tricky).
1966 Ford Falcon Part 30 - Inching Closer To The V8 Swap
Переглядів 2409 місяців тому
Final engine preparations, rear axle refurb, some parts reviews and a troublesome wiper issue.
Revell/Monogram 1970 Boss 302 Mustang kit review
Переглядів 2739 місяців тому
This is an old version of Revell's 1970 Boss 302 but the box contents are essentially the same.
Death of the Scram 411
Переглядів 3,4 тис.9 місяців тому
The Scram is about to become an endangered species.
1966 Ford Falcon Part 29 - Sharing My Stupidity
Переглядів 524Рік тому
I begin work prepping the 302 for installation, and wind up making more work for myself.
Royal Enfield Scram 3000 mile service notes
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
Royal Enfield Scram 3000 mile service notes
Royal Enfield Scram 411 3000 mile update
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
Royal Enfield Scram 411 3000 mile update
1966 Ford Falcon Part 28 - Window Regulator Tips and What It's Like To Drive.
Переглядів 483Рік тому
1966 Ford Falcon Part 28 - Window Regulator Tips and What It's Like To Drive.
AMT 1966 Mustang Fastback Model Kit Build & Review
Переглядів 814Рік тому
AMT 1966 Mustang Fastback Model Kit Build & Review
Paint For Model Cars - You Have Choices
Переглядів 65Рік тому
Paint For Model Cars - You Have Choices
1966 Ford Falcon Part 27 - V8 Swap Notes
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
1966 Ford Falcon Part 27 - V8 Swap Notes
Royal Enfield Scram 411 Touring Seat Review
Переглядів 3,1 тис.Рік тому
Royal Enfield Scram 411 Touring Seat Review
1966 Ford Falcon Part 26 - Wipe on clear coat? Are you nuts?!
Переглядів 3 тис.Рік тому
1966 Ford Falcon Part 26 - Wipe on clear coat? Are you nuts?!
Skeptical Owner Reveals Scram 411 Hates and Likes
Переглядів 22 тис.Рік тому
Skeptical Owner Reveals Scram 411 Hates and Likes
Picking up the Himalayan/Scram 411
Переглядів 1,4 тис.Рік тому
Picking up the Himalayan/Scram 411
Classic Ford replaced master cylinder now no brake lights??!
Переглядів 301Рік тому
Classic Ford replaced master cylinder now no brake lights??!
Puig windshield for Scram 411 - review
Переглядів 4,3 тис.Рік тому
Puig windshield for Scram 411 - review
Antique Or Modern Retro Style Bike - Which Is Best For You?
Переглядів 883Рік тому
Antique Or Modern Retro Style Bike - Which Is Best For You?
1966 Ford Falcon Part 25 - Update, Failed Electrics
Переглядів 434Рік тому
1966 Ford Falcon Part 25 - Update, Failed Electrics
The Hidden Truth About The Scram 411
Переглядів 4,6 тис.Рік тому
The Hidden Truth About The Scram 411

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @zazbeam
    @zazbeam 2 дні тому

    Put HEI and Sniper 2 on my Buick 455 and man did it wake this thing up! Runs way stronger at all RPM and I would never go back.

  • @kenchorney2724
    @kenchorney2724 5 днів тому

    I have yet to see an adequate parking brake system on any aftermarket rear disc brake setup.

  • @MuthaDucka1
    @MuthaDucka1 5 днів тому

    I found a 2005 V6 Supreme convertible with 104,000 miles. It started out as a fleet vehicle then has had two owners since. Car is immaculate with a little rust on the chassis. The convertible top is in great condition with no signs of wear, loose seams, frayed fabric and rear window is solid. Interior is also immaculate with no tears or scratches on the seats or dash. Car runs great. I am expecting to have issues as with any 20 year old vehicle which most i can replace/repair myself. The old fella wss asking $7800 and at this time we are at $7100. I've not been able to find any 05 V6's less than $6500 that are on decent shape. Looking at this car for my daughter who is turning 16. She doesn't really like the convertible but i haven't been able to find another 05-14 V6 solid top in decent shape for this price. What do you/y'all think is a decent price from the vague description I gave?

  • @my68porsche
    @my68porsche 5 днів тому

    Wow! Thanks for this information!!! I have been looking into better lighting for my '64 Ranchero and decided Holley was just too much money for a car I have driven once in the dark. (It's fully restored) I just ordered this kit from my local dealer today (Friday) and it will be here on Monday for $38 including tax! This! This is the Christmas Miracle!!! ;)

  • @sgt.v7237
    @sgt.v7237 6 днів тому

    Nice balanced review. Been leaning towards one of these for my everyday bike in Guatemala with true dual purpose for when I want to up the trail riding. The Scram will be so much more practical for the everyday stuff and nice to know I can still get scrappy with it.

  • @AKARACIK
    @AKARACIK 6 днів тому

    Scram 440 is on the way.

  • @jrwstl02
    @jrwstl02 7 днів тому

    Good video! Good advice on the fan and spacer. Bad advice on the radiator shroud. If it fits the radiator correctly and matches fan diameter correctly, then it is the MOST important thing you can add to improve engine cooling. On rear disc brakes, I only added them for one reason. They look cool! And Baer (and others) make a well designed integral parking brake.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 7 днів тому

      Lots of people misunderstood me on the fan shroud. I tried to make the point they aren't always necessary, as a lot of cars didn't have them. And there aren't any for this car. But they will always improve a cooling system.

    • @jrwstl02
      @jrwstl02 7 днів тому

      @ Thanks for your reply! There’s a balance between enjoying these cars exactly the way they were built, and improving or modernizing that original design. Best example is tires. These 60s-70’s cars had bias ply, but all of us run radials today! I agree your Falcon didn’t come with a shroud, and looks original without it. I can’t help but wonder if one for a ‘70 Mustang 302 would fit? Part of what keeps this hobby fun!

  • @jameskim62
    @jameskim62 7 днів тому

    Could you please tell us where you bought the accessories, especially the windscreen? I purchased the same unit in December of 2024 for cad$4,800 including everything. Shipping and handling was $1,800

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 7 днів тому

      All of the accessories except the windscreen came from RE. I have a separate video on the screen; it is a Puig.

  • @MyLifeThai371
    @MyLifeThai371 9 днів тому

    The one thing that sucks is they only get 21-22 mpg from new.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 9 днів тому

      I get a consistent 22-24 just bombing around. High 20s on highway trips. Mine is a manual, though, which helps.

    • @MyLifeThai371
      @MyLifeThai371 9 днів тому

      @mongrelmotorsports Mine is the automatic.

  • @J45yu456
    @J45yu456 12 днів тому

    Subscribing for the common sense 👍🙌

  • @joedyeranch1
    @joedyeranch1 13 днів тому

    I'm about to do this on my '95 f350. Been leaking for a while. Hopefully after I get it cleaned out I can give it all a good coating or 2 with bedliner. Like just coat the whole inside.

  • @dragracingrule
    @dragracingrule 14 днів тому

    Wow wee these trucks have gotten expensive

  • @carebear2272
    @carebear2272 15 днів тому

    There’s nothing wrong with drum brakes either up front or all the way around. Unless your doing a lot of hard and a lot of breaking like one a race track or heavy road rage driving….lol in my opinion. The problem with drum brakes they get hot quicker and fade if your doing a lot of hard breaking.

  • @Geoduck.
    @Geoduck. 15 днів тому

    I'm a Chevy guy but love your car. I'm with you on the EFI. For older GM cars and trucks a HEI swap is a big upgrade in my personal experience. Having said that electronic plugin type modules on the market today are often chinesium unreliable junk.

  • @vicsspeedperformance950
    @vicsspeedperformance950 16 днів тому

    Well I'll be dipped 💯👍🏽

  • @joshmaxwell1692
    @joshmaxwell1692 16 днів тому

    Do you still have your bonneville?

  • @jackpoage5419
    @jackpoage5419 17 днів тому

    Low profile tires don't belong on classics in my opinion. I was surprised when the 2005 Mustang came out. It had 65 series tire so the Mustang still had a decent amount of sidewall showing to go along with the retro body style.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 17 днів тому

      I plan on doing a video on that in the new year when my new wheels arrive.

  • @jay_Jalapeno
    @jay_Jalapeno 17 днів тому

    @3:32 i see this guy has never had points take a dump on him or having to set the points ever 20k . Electric ignitions are for everything you said PLUS reliability. You can also keep a spare icm

  • @larryjernigan2947
    @larryjernigan2947 17 днів тому

    I just bought one similar to yours. Mine is not the Pony. It’s a 2005 with a manual transmission and 62,000 actual miles. It is totally original with no mods. The car is fun to drive the way it is. I am the second owner. May add some mods later, but I am satisfied for now. It’s my 3rd V6 Mustang. Couldn’t ever afford the GT. Enjoyed your video. The others that I owned were a 2000 and a 2012, both automatics. Should have kept my 12, but during a weaker moment, I traded it for a 2018 Tacoma.

  • @shovelwrench
    @shovelwrench 17 днів тому

    It's that Edelbrock fuel injection!! That shit will get you every time!!

  • @obxbill01
    @obxbill01 18 днів тому

    That was a hoot! Your effective use of mind numbing drivel to explain not complex scenarios was top notch! Loved it. :)

  • @RichardChristian-pz5gh
    @RichardChristian-pz5gh 22 дні тому

    Thank you for the information on the trunk lid i sandpaper my tires gives some miles on them nice looking cars 👍

  • @JRobert111111
    @JRobert111111 22 дні тому

    A couple things you left out are loud exhausts and those tacky looking straight pipe or chrome exhaust tips coming out the rear of the car. Also those huge wheels with tiny tires look ridiculous. Now on your Ford points issue; Fords are a PITA if you use a dwell meter to finely dial in your dwell to make the car perform its best under hot and cold conditions. GM points (who cares if they're in the rear) are so easy to do. They're one assembly (points/condenser) and pre-gapped to get the car running. Stick your allen wrench through the little garage door and the dwell is easily dialed in very quickly. On my 67 Impala SS (327 4V/THM400) that my grandfather bought brand new; the only modifications I've made are a NAPA electric choke kit which just has a little black block resting against a heater hose. The GM little "hot box" chokes were a joke. This NAPA one has worked flawlessly for several decades on the Quadrajet carb. I've also done a dual exhaust, but as "OEM" looking and sounding as possibly, but it did give it a bit more oomph. I also did a quartz clock movement conversion on the clock a few decades ago and it still ticks along great to this day. Other than those things, my car is as stock as it can be.

  • @IvanBeliaev-m2j
    @IvanBeliaev-m2j 22 дні тому

    Good rant! I did not manage to read all the comments, so maybe this was already mentioned: I used to be per-occupied with having fuel injection/electronic ignition, in the past, simply because I did not have experience with carbed engines and never managed to own one in good operating condition to begin with. Once I've got a couple of older cars and learned to properly operate the carb/points combo, never doing any more of the unnecessary "improvements" screwing up my classics 😅

  • @christcarscountry6870
    @christcarscountry6870 23 дні тому

    On the points subject. I highly agree that the self-serviceablity of a mechanical ignition system is an excellent plus, and consistent with the values of someone who also likes carburetors because they allow the same self serviceability but for your fueling. However, if you have purchased a classic that hasn't been cared for, doing a revival, or for any other reason need new points ignition components (points, condenser, etc.) the parts they make now SUCK. I brought two new sets of points and two new condensers with my to go get my Uncle's F-100 running again for the first time in 20 years. ALL of them failed. Both sets of points were supplying constant ground (were not breaking ground when opening on the distributor cam) to the coil and therefore it would not build any juice. One condenser had shorted into itself. The other may have worked - seemed fine. But I can't say for sure because the truck never made noise and yes, the factory points and condenser were beyond saving. While the factory points did break ground when open (like they're supposed to), thebrubbing block was wasted and the actual contacts were worn down from decades of use and constant sanding to keep them sparkin. That was enough for me. Maybe the Pertronix could fail, and maybe it's not as badass and old school as I'd prefer (I did try to save the points for a reason), but I just don't trust the quality of reproduced parts these days and I'm not screwing with that junk anymore. Should mention that both sets of points and both condensers were from two different brands. On top of that, the same argument could be made for electronic ignitions that you can just keep a spare Pertronix Ignitor I or II in your glove box since you probably won't find one at O'Reilly. Might be a bit more expensive but still the same rule applies. They're stupid easy to install and saving as much money as possible isn't exactly the foundation of the classic car hobby. Carburetors are a totally differrent story though. Edlebrock, Holley, and all sub brands like Quick Fuel all still make excellent quality units and parts and even your old Rochestors, Motorcrafts, and Webers can be kept up with decent quality rebuild kits and an owners manual or quick dive on a forum. Basically boils down to this: Points ignitions don't have the reproduction and late model parts support that carburetors have. So while I am a die hard carburetor guy, the points will be reserved for when I find factory examples in good condition. Who knows maybe one day people will start to love em again. Lots of old school self reliance type junk is getting popular again.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 23 дні тому

      I don't disagree with any of your 'points'. Parts quality is a real problem.

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 22 дні тому

      @christcarscountry6870 points are obsolete technology, they have poor reliability and durability and they have low ignition performance that reduces starting performance and overall engine performance. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to use points if a quality electronic ignition unit is available. Your other ignition components, starter, battery and your whole engine will last longer using electronic ignition

    • @ramblerdave1339
      @ramblerdave1339 22 дні тому

      ​​@@mongrelmotorsports One Issue I had with a Pertronix that was on my Javelin when I bought it, and didn't seem to run well (other issues were also present), was the fact that AMC cars use a resistance wire to the coil, and the previous owner had installed the lead wire of the Pertronix to that terminal, giving it less voltage than the full 12V it required. It needed a separate 12V wire from the run position of the ignition switch.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 22 дні тому

      @@ramblerdave1339 that resistance wire is also on Fords. In my case it was impossible to locate, so I had to make an entire harness with a relay to bypass it. You get bonus points for having a Javelin, a car I also love.

  • @Todd-o8n
    @Todd-o8n 23 дні тому

    May I please add, giant wheels and rubber band tires?

  • @NetKnob
    @NetKnob 24 дні тому

    I completely agree. Points will always get you home. A matchbook in the glove box is all you need : the striker to clean the points, the cover to gap them and you're on your way. When an electronic ignition goes out - and I've had three of them fail - you're done. And I'll keep my Carter AFB, thank you. The one thing I cannot stand on old muscle cars is 16 inch or larger wheel and tire combinations, the look is absolutely hideous.

  • @markmoire2058
    @markmoire2058 24 дні тому

    Good common sense video

  • @seana806
    @seana806 25 днів тому

    The thing people seem to forget, is the more stuff you add on or modify, the higher probability of something failing causing lots of headaches, will be the cliche of “unreliable old car”. The only thing I would modify which applies to cars built before 1963, would be to ditch the road draft tube, replacing it with a PCV valve. While the road draft tube may have worked many years ago, doesn’t do anything to remove vapors from the engine and can cause seals to blow out if it were to get clogged or restricted with something.

  • @mkaestn
    @mkaestn 25 днів тому

    Point ignition, not a problem , But 1975 hei on GM works and works.

  • @ynotlast9210
    @ynotlast9210 25 днів тому

    Thank you sir! Owner’s preference. Builds have “needs” and “wants” Street build,Track, Daily driver, Sunday cruiser all have different levels of functions. Then you have Restoration shops wanting to suck your account dry. This is a TORNADO topic and I love all the points people make to justify their opinions. It’s car politics. … now I’m gonna get back to porting and polishing my heads for my very otherwise stock engine

  • @ozone385
    @ozone385 25 днів тому

    They have put sbc's in to many cars that aren't Chevys. I like the motor and badge to match.

  • @danielvanorder2462
    @danielvanorder2462 25 днів тому

    This guy's an idiot

  • @ScanianDude
    @ScanianDude 25 днів тому

    And here I am a guy wishing it was legal (here in scandinavia) to put a carb and points ignition on a jeep cherokee xj. And drum brakes rear are just awesome (unless one drives like a speedfreak) always lubing up the rear disc brakes a few times a year on my own and wifes car because they are not used enough and sticking....

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      Rear disc parking brakes...ugh. A constant source of despair on my Fiat 124s back in the day.

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 25 днів тому

      @@mongrelmotorsports Because its a FIAT ( Fix it again tony) rear disks are much better than drums now. In every way

  • @utoobuser206
    @utoobuser206 25 днів тому

    Wanna learn something about old cars? Go watch (this old tony) yeah he's a Mopar guy but he knows his stuff inside n out and realistic as hell.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      I have a UTG sticker on my car. Probably added back all the HP I gave up keeping the stock fan. 😄

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 25 днів тому

      Its "uncle tony's garage". He is experienced but living in the past. Also needs to get his teeth fixed. This old tonys cannel is an engineer really sharp,

  • @Pablo453
    @Pablo453 25 днів тому

    Former restorer here. - I totally get wanting to keep something stock. It works, it's simple, and often much cheaper to maintain. I think a car should suit the drivers needs. The reason I prefer resto-mod over stock is to improve the capabilities. My 66 Caprice has 4 shocks in the rear for better cornering, I swapped out the TH350 for a 700r4 to get a very much needed overdrive, I did the 4 wheel disc for better braking (even going backwards), and easier maintenance. - I hate messing with drum brakes. 😃 Running a 355 built for alcohol at 13:1 with a long duration cam and the motor runs cleaner inside than any stock one I've had. I'm still running Mallory Unilite components from the 80's. Absolutely love them.

  • @utoobuser206
    @utoobuser206 25 днів тому

    1. Theres more SBC's under old ford hoods than ford for a reason. 2. HEI is on point and runs hotter , easier to service , extends plug life and doesn't bounce at high RPM and just plain more reliable. 3. I agree on carbs , just use the right one for displacement, bigger ain't always better. Power and performance is a balancing game. 4.at least get a light weight flex fan, that bomber propeller sucks power at all RPMs and doesn't do any good at freeway speeds. BEST, go electric pusher , works when you need 'em, doesnt chop off fingers , doesnt suck HP and gets stuff out from under the hood that you have to worry about and work around.just a big win! 5.BRAKES. disc front, drum back, yep! And get the best you can ! Well worth every penny. 6.GET SOME BLOODY HEADERS! And cross overs on the straightest pipes you can .every bend sucks power. The least resistance improves mileage and performance. Quit being a car fudd , they built these things as cheap and quickly as they could to make money , theres tons of potential in these old engines , but they needed to just make the general public happy.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      Agree except on headers...what a giant PITA they are most of the time. Leaks, burnt plug wires, difficult to install. The hipo small block manifolds on my car flow almost as well. I did add an H pipe too.

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 23 дні тому

      @@mongrelmotorsports No any exhaust manifold wont even get close to the performance of a long tube header. with a little thinking and a good quality set of headers most issues can be avoided.

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 22 дні тому

      Can't install what they don't make.

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 22 дні тому

      Mustang headers should me the same as falcon

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 22 дні тому

      @@mongrelmotorsports long tube headers are not the priority. 4 wheel disk brakes or at least front disks and a dual cylinder 5 lug wheels is. Mustang parts should fit. I seem to remember the 6 cylinder steering linkage was different. if you still have the 6cylinder rear those thing don't even hold up to the 6. A 57 -60 ford 9 inch is the correct width. or an 8inch out of a mustang.

  • @stuartkynoch7289
    @stuartkynoch7289 25 днів тому

    Pertronics are a good swap on older stock Ford distributors when there is lots of wear on the dizzy cam and you're not building some high HP motor. That being said a new or rebuilt distributor would be a better idea. I'm a Ford guy but I'll admit Ford distributors are not the best. A better coil would make sense too.

    • @killermachine6859
      @killermachine6859 25 днів тому

      Pertronics is a decent "Conversion" setup, what I don't get are those giant GM HEI "Franken-distributor" monstrosity hybrid distributors, Especially when you have the Motorcraft Duraspark option? I am curious on What makes you believe that Ford Distributors aren't the necessarily the best? Are you referring to the Motorcraft design ? I am an AMC guy, after a brief stint with a Prestolite setup, AMC went with Motorcraft's Duraspark design for Electronic Ignition. The Motorcraft Duraspark distributor itself can trigger not only the OEM box but most other Modules as well , Including the module inside the GM HEI, also the Mopar unit or any aftermarket boxes like MSD 6. I use good quality plug wires and the small cap, without that "adapter" after thought thing for the larger cap, the engineers at Motorcraft must have figured the big cap wasn't really necessary or I would think they would have updated the housing for Ford.

  • @AlightBULLDOG
    @AlightBULLDOG 25 днів тому

    But you robbed a bunch of free power with that fan. Electric fan the way to go. Cold weather no fan blowing=warming up quicker. No fan turning while driving down the road=more power. Working on the engine=not cutting your fingers off lol

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      Totally true. A clutch fan would be a good halfway update as well.

  • @roninthedestroyer8958
    @roninthedestroyer8958 25 днів тому

    I swapped to GM HEI

  • @blest5132
    @blest5132 25 днів тому

    but if your rear brakes aren't effective then your front brakes have to do ALL the work which will lead to fade. it's really not too hard to figure this one out and anyway who says "don't upgrade your brake system"??? what a poor take 👎

    • @christcarscountry6870
      @christcarscountry6870 23 дні тому

      Your assumption is that drum brakes are inneffective at stopping which is absolutely not the case. Drum brakes are durable, reliable, and the shoes last much longer than disc brake pads. Drum brakes primary faults are heat buildup and overall less balls to the wall brake performance. For typicaly street use and occasional romping, drums are perfectly adequate and stop just fine. For moderate track use like drag and autocross, you can adequately get away with them and in many cases you can upgrade the performance of factory drum systems. If you want all out performance or just want the extra braking capacity for the hell of it, yeah a rear disc conversion isn't a sin or a mistake by any means, but drums were used commonly as standard rear brakes well into even the 2010s because they are durable and tried and true. Even some brand new semis still use drums at every wheel. Drum brakes are not obsolete by any stretch and this is coming from a young buck. Anyone who thinks they don't stop well or make the discs do all the work is terribly misinformed. My '70 Montes rear drum brakes lock up before the front discs when I anchor the pedal and I just refreshed the fronts!

    • @blest5132
      @blest5132 23 дні тому

      @@christcarscountry6870 I'm not knocking drums, I'm just knocking the idea of not upgrading as it's deemed useless and I'm disagreeing on this point.

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 23 дні тому

      @@christcarscountry6870 NO all cars for the last 50 years have been equipped with disks on the front and later in the later years in the rear also for a reason. Hanging onto the past just holds you back. Yes drum brakes are self energizing so they are not smooth and grab that's very dangerous locking up the rear in emergency's or HP driving, rain ar snow will cause an accident. Disks are smooth and predictable stop after stop. Drums grab then fade.

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 22 дні тому

      @christcarscountry6870 Drum brakes are completely and totally inferior to disc brakes, which is why they have replaced drum brakes in every application where brake performance is critical. If the rear brakes are locking up before the front your brake bias is not correct, or there is a malfunction in your brake system that should be corrected.

    • @tomhutchins1046
      @tomhutchins1046 22 дні тому

      @@sandervanderkammen9230 Rear drums are grabby by design you can't tune it out with a proportioning valve. There self energizing which mean once they touch the drum they wedge and increase the grip. That's good for less petal pressure but makes them unpredictable and inconsistent.

  • @RealWorldGarage
    @RealWorldGarage 25 днів тому

    Agree to all, but one point. Cooling, fan and shroud. Hear me out. I went with a fan with a built on shroud that allows it to pull air through the entire core. Keep in mind we have added AC as well. We were able to remove the fan blade of course and the water pump lasted for over 20yrs. Life of the water pump is increased when you remove the weight of the spinning fan, and it does add some HP back, there will be less lost through the added amperage on the alternator. 6:24

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      Better, yes. Necessary? Probably not, though with adding the a/c condenser on your car it may have been.

  • @sandervanderkammen9230
    @sandervanderkammen9230 25 днів тому

    None of your points are valid and reveal someone who has very limited formal education or professional experience regarding these topics. Please stop giving bad advice if you can't be bothered to do proper research on the video subjects..

    • @RealWorldGarage
      @RealWorldGarage 25 днів тому

      Well aren’t you just a little bundle of sunshine. These are his opinions, now if anyone should be called out, maybe it should be YOU. How many videos have you produced, sharing your thoughts and opinions on your well studied, thoughtful hotrod building expertise???? Ah none…….

    • @mongrelmotorsports
      @mongrelmotorsports 25 днів тому

      @@RealWorldGarage his reply reads like it was written by AI.

    • @christcarscountry6870
      @christcarscountry6870 23 дні тому

      Aight bro show us your kickass hot rod.

    • @jackpoage5419
      @jackpoage5419 16 днів тому

      I have been modifying my cars and motorcycles for performance since 1968. This man with the Falcon is right. I was a fully certified senior master tech for a major brand (to factory training 27 times, hundreds of hours of online training) and have a lifetime of experience and a modded daily driver 1973 Maverick with 244,000 miles on it, many on the strip.

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 16 днів тому

      @jackpoage5419 Well if that's true? You have no excuse for sharing such benighted, ignorant opinions. People that do the exactly same thing for many years stop learning anything new and get left behind in the world of automotive technology

  • @jimsmith9819
    @jimsmith9819 25 днів тому

    fyi, GM distributors are on the rear of the engine, disc brakes dont need adjusting like drum brakes do and last longer

    • @christcarscountry6870
      @christcarscountry6870 23 дні тому

      Disc brakes most definitely do not last longer. Drum brake shoes generally have longer life than disc brake pads and drums persisted in common use well well WELL into the age of disc brakes being common OE equipment for a reason. Drum brake systems are very reliable and while disc brakes inarguably have advantages, drums are a trusted, tried and true brake setup and even to this day are common on 2500 and up pickups, and still at all wheels on semis and tractor trailers.

    • @jimsmith9819
      @jimsmith9819 23 дні тому

      @@christcarscountry6870 i disagree, i have an 86 3500- with four wheel disc brakes do some actual research

    • @christcarscountry6870
      @christcarscountry6870 22 дні тому

      ​@@jimsmith9819 Bro I work on heavy duty pickups for a living AND got my education on highway tractors - disc brake calipers are more failure prone and disc brake pads wear out much faster than drum brake shoes. You owning a heavy duty pickup with four wheel discs doesn't magically erase the fact that highway tractors to this very day still use drum brakes at all wheels and just a few years before your truck was built, my FRIEND'S Dodge Power Wagon came factory with four wheel drums. And rear drum brakes are still OE standard on nearly all dually pickups to this day. Do YOUR research bozo.

    • @cdglasser
      @cdglasser 21 день тому

      FYI, not all GM distributors are on the rear of the engine. Buick and Cadillac engines had them in the front.

    • @jimsmith9819
      @jimsmith9819 21 день тому

      @cdglasser as a general rule they are

  • @vicsspeedperformance950
    @vicsspeedperformance950 25 днів тому

    The fuel line comes through the bigger hole

  • @johnhenke6475
    @johnhenke6475 25 днів тому

    Aluminum is too soft. The groove just wears out. The belt can't squeez into it. The belt just bottoms out in the groove.

  • @tbjtbj4786
    @tbjtbj4786 26 днів тому

    On cooling it depends on where you're at. I saw 70s fords over heat when new in fl summer. Those 400 f150 ran hot.

  • @aarondodge1913
    @aarondodge1913 26 днів тому

    Amen!! Everyone knows the guy that needs to rechip and mod. the intake for ( better) performance. Ya right. Auto manufacturers have spent millions engineering your car for optimal performance. The after market is often just reengineering what has been done already, just to sell you something.

    • @ramblerdave1339
      @ramblerdave1339 25 днів тому

      Not true, they design them to meet a compromise, of performance, fuel mileage and quiet operation. The second two hurt power output.

    • @davestevens4193
      @davestevens4193 25 днів тому

      In 1966 they spent about $50k engineering that car. Every innovation mandated by the govt was paid for in blood. Your premise is laughable. Any 2024 cars using points, carbs, no passenger side mirror? Steel dash, drum brakes?

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 25 днів тому

      Old technology becomes obsolete when better technology is developed. Just because it's original does not mean it's better... cars from the 50's 60s and 70s were high maintenance, low efficiency and low performance and had poor reliability. Anyone that thinks points are better? Needs their head checked..

    • @RealWorldGarage
      @RealWorldGarage 25 днів тому

      @@sandervanderkammen9230 I don’t believe he said they were better, I think he said they were sufficient with regards to performance and reliability in the average hot rod/daily driver.

  • @katyair1
    @katyair1 26 днів тому

    100%

  • @thomasschumacher5318
    @thomasschumacher5318 26 днів тому

    you spoke my mind 👍