Meru Media
Meru Media
  • 66
  • 131 139
How to Love in Sanskrit: A Conversation with Suhas Mahesh and Anusha Rao
Host: Mukunda Raghavan (x.com/raghman36)
Guests: Suhas Mahesh and Anusha Rao ( x.com/suhasm) (raoanusha.com/)
Their new book, 'How to Love in Sanskrit' : (a.co/d/c2c9K8v)
Music:
Vocals: Krishna Parthasarathy
Guitar: Ben Kunin
Editing: Kūci Harikiraṇ Prasād ( kuciharikiran) (youtube.com/@UCGp4kHyhvSLaDqPSJGkfUzA )
Переглядів: 402

Відео

Three commentaries on the Gītā: A conversation with Ācārya Sthāneśvar Timālsinā
Переглядів 949Місяць тому
Ācārya Sthāneśvar Timālsinā and Mukunda Rāghavan discuss three commentaries on Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā: those of Śaṅkarācārya, Rāmānujācārya and Abhinavagupta. Time stamps: 00:00- Intro Beginning 00:45- Intro Ending 03:45- Why Ācāryajī has begun a new series on Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā 07:10- On being both a practitioner and a scholar 10:13- On whether Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā can be read solely on its ow...
War, Dharma and Justice: A Conversation with Raj Balkaran
Переглядів 3483 місяці тому
Join Mukunda as he speaks to Professor Raj Balkaran, Oxford Centre of Hindu Studies. He is a scholar of the Puranas and Narratives and the author of The Goddess and the King in Indian Myth. He is also the host of an amazing podcast called New Books in Indian Religions. Dr. Balkaran has also launched a new podcast called The Indian Wisdom Podcast. Dr. Balkaran returns to the podcast and in this ...
Bhagavān, Bhakti and Philosophy: A Conversation with Dr. Edwin Bryant
Переглядів 2,1 тис.3 місяці тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Dr. Edwin Bryant, Professor of Religion at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Dr. Bryant is a prolific and prodigious scholar of Indian Religions with his primary focus on Hindu Philosophy, Yoga and Bhakti. He has published eight books and authored a number of articles on the earliest origins of the Vedic culture, yoga philosophy, and the Krishna tradition. These i...
Namaste Yoga, Fijians Hindus and the Diaspora: A Conversation with Ravi Chand
Переглядів 4936 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Ravi Chand, an actor, writer, producer and director at Warrior Tribe Films. Ravi has mostly recently produced, written, directed and acted in Namaste Yoga, a short film that dives into the Hindu diasporic experience. In this episode, we discuss a host of topics including: 00:01:20 Introduction to Ravi Chand and his background being of Hindu-Indo-Fijian descent and ...
Hindoo History and Hindu Diaspora in the USA: A Conversation with Vishal Ganesan
Переглядів 1,4 тис.6 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Vishal Ganesan, who is a lawyer and posts on the Twitter handle @hindoohistory. In this episode, we discuss a host of topics including: 00:01:20 Introduction to Vishal Ganesan and conversation on growing up in the US 00:23:40 Origins and Purpose of Hindoo History; 00:32:40 American Missionaries relationship with British Missionaries in the Indian colonial period; 0...
Advaita, Consciousness and Ramakrishna: A Conversation with Swami Sarvapriyananda
Переглядів 20 тис.7 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Swami Sarvapriyananda, the Head Monk at the Vedanta Society of New York. Swami Sarvapriyananda is a well-known speaker on Vedanta and his talks are extremely popular globally via the internet. He has been a speaker on various prestigious forums such as TEDx, SAND, Google Talk etc. He has also been invited to speak at several universities across the world, including...
Hinduism, Coloniality and Philosophical Musings: A Conversation with Dr. Deepak Sarma
Переглядів 9348 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Dr Deepak Sarma, a tenured professor of Religious Studies at Case Western University. Dr Sarma has written numerous academic articles for a variety of academic journals and conferences is the author of Classical Indian Philosophy: A Reader (2011), Hinduism: A Reader (2008), Epistemologies and the Limitations of Philosophical Inquiry: Doctrine in Madhva Vedanta (200...
Islam, Tradition and Modernity: A Conversation with Dr. Javad Hashmi
Переглядів 2,5 тис.10 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Dr. Javad Hashmi, a Phd. candidate at Harvard University in Islamic studies and is also a medical doctor. He has written numerous academic articles for a variety of academic journals and conferences along with engaging in discussions and debates about Islam, Islamism, Atheism and History of Islamic Thought. In this episode, we discuss a host of topics including: 00...
Dvaita Vedanta: A Conversation with Dr. Anusha Rao
Переглядів 4 тис.10 місяців тому
Join Mukunda as we speak with Dr. Anusha Rao, a Phd. candidate at the University of Toronto. Dr. Rao is currently finishing her Phd. on Dvaita Vedanta at the University of Toronto. She has written numerous professional articles for a variety of academic journals and conferences along with op-eds for the Deccan Herald. In this episode, we discuss a host of topics including: 00:01:20 Introduction...
Hindu Media Matters: A Conversation with Prof. Vamsee Juluri
Переглядів 82511 місяців тому
Join Mukunda and Dr. Omari as we speak with Prof. Vamsee Juluri, Professor of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco, on a joint Brown Pundits and Meru Media episode. Prof. Juluri is the author of Becoming a Global Audience: Longing and Belonging in Indian Music Television, The Mythologist: A Novel, Bollywood Nation: India through its Cinema and Rearming Hinduism: Nature, History and ...
Saiva Siddhanta: History, Philosophy and Concepts
Переглядів 3 тис.Рік тому
A Conversation with Ghorangirasa and Pinakasena Join Mukunda as he speaks with the men behind the Twitter handles of @Ghorangirasa and @Pinakasena. Both Ghorangirasa and Pinakasena are scholarly practitioners of Saiva Siddhanta sampradaya and write many posts around the sampradaya. In this episode, we discuss a host of topics including: 00:01:20 Introduction to Ghorangirasa and Pinakasena along...
The State of Hindu Americans: Race/Culture, Academia & Identity A Conversation with Dr. Jeffery Long
Переглядів 738Рік тому
Join Mukunda as he speaks with Dr. Jeffery Long. Dr. Long is the Carl W. Zeigler Professor of Religion, Philosophy & Asian Studies at Elizabethtown College. He is the author of many books Jainism: An Introduction, Hinduism in America, Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, A Vision for Hinduism: Beyond Hindu Nationalism and other books. Dr. Long is an amazing scholar grounded in Indian tradition an...
A Convergence of Indian and Western Philosophy: A Conversation with Dr. Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad
Переглядів 955Рік тому
Join Mukunda as he speaks with Dr. Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad. Dr. Ram-Prasad is Distinguished Professor of Comparative Religion and Philosophy at Lancaster University. He is the author of many books including Divine Self/Human Self, Human Being/Bodily Being, Knowledge and Liberation in Classical Indian Thought, Advaita Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Outline of Indian Non-Realism and other books...
Samkhya, Vedanta and Mahabharata: A Conversation with Dr. T.S. Rukmani
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
Join Mukunda as he speaks with Dr. T.S. Rukmani. Dr. T.S. Rukmani was Professor and Chair in Hindu Studies at Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. She had the distinction of being the first Chair in Hindu Studies and Indian Philosophy at the University of Durban-Westville, South Africa. She had a distinguished academic career at the University of Delhi, where her last assignment was Principa...
Sanskrit, Shastras and Society: A Conversation with Dr. Satyan Sharma
Переглядів 909Рік тому
Sanskrit, Shastras and Society: A Conversation with Dr. Satyan Sharma
Ismailism and Islamic History: A Conversation with Dr. Khalil Andani
Переглядів 6 тис.Рік тому
Ismailism and Islamic History: A Conversation with Dr. Khalil Andani
Justice, Sexuality, Gender and Dharma: A Conversation with Dr. Ruth Vanita
Переглядів 805Рік тому
Justice, Sexuality, Gender and Dharma: A Conversation with Dr. Ruth Vanita
Hinduism, Perennial Wisdom and Engaging with Islam: A Conversation with Farhan Qureshi
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
Hinduism, Perennial Wisdom and Engaging with Islam: A Conversation with Farhan Qureshi
Indo-Aryan Origins, Genetics and Pre-History: A Conversation with Ashish Kulkarni
Переглядів 4 тис.Рік тому
Indo-Aryan Origins, Genetics and Pre-History: A Conversation with Ashish Kulkarni
A Standup Hindu: A Conversation with Rajiv Satyal
Переглядів 370Рік тому
A Standup Hindu: A Conversation with Rajiv Satyal
Ancient and Modern Aesthetics: A Dialogue with Dr. Bharat Gupt
Переглядів 555Рік тому
Ancient and Modern Aesthetics: A Dialogue with Dr. Bharat Gupt
Living Traditions and Puranas A Dialogue with Prof. McComas Taylor
Переглядів 519Рік тому
Living Traditions and Puranas A Dialogue with Prof. McComas Taylor
Christianity, Theology and Theodicy: A Conversation with Seth P. Hart
Переглядів 4912 роки тому
Christianity, Theology and Theodicy: A Conversation with Seth P. Hart
Theology Unleashed: A Conversation and Discussion with Arjuna Gallagher
Переглядів 7582 роки тому
Theology Unleashed: A Conversation and Discussion with Arjuna Gallagher
Understanding the Dharma Shastras: A Conversation with Dr. Patrick Olivelle and Dr. Donald Davis
Переглядів 2,1 тис.2 роки тому
Understanding the Dharma Shastras: A Conversation with Dr. Patrick Olivelle and Dr. Donald Davis
Introduction to Pancaratra: Vaishnava Agama and Tantra
Переглядів 3,1 тис.2 роки тому
Introduction to Pancaratra: Vaishnava Agama and Tantra
Mahabharata Unravelled: A Conversation with Ami Ganatra
Переглядів 1,8 тис.2 роки тому
Mahabharata Unravelled: A Conversation with Ami Ganatra
Narratives, Life and Timeless Wisdom: A Conversation with Dr. Raj Balkaran
Переглядів 7602 роки тому
Narratives, Life and Timeless Wisdom: A Conversation with Dr. Raj Balkaran
Hindu Dalits, Caste and Conversion: A Conversation with Prerna Thiruvaipati
Переглядів 2,3 тис.2 роки тому
Hindu Dalits, Caste and Conversion: A Conversation with Prerna Thiruvaipati

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @justynjedraszewski6094
    @justynjedraszewski6094 3 дні тому

    Great lecture, reading Madhusudana Sarasvati on Gita in Catholic Poland and Sri Aurobindo's the same time, while Lakshmanjoo is waiting at the door with Abhinava - all is resumed on one advise: know your Self and you will know everything (Delphi Temple motto)

  • @AmiraAroraOfficial
    @AmiraAroraOfficial 7 днів тому

    Swamiji is ❤🙏🏼

  • @Sid0419
    @Sid0419 9 днів тому

    What a wasted session with a great swami. Asking about why the US doesn't have monk schools...

    • @merumedia4249
      @merumedia4249 5 днів тому

      I'm glad you focused on one tiny part of a 2+ hour conversation, forest for the trees

  • @adeshsaxena6874
    @adeshsaxena6874 18 днів тому

    The guest at this podcast completely floored me! I was aware of Madhavacharya, but had no idea of the extent of literature available on this Vaishnav tradition. Superb podcast. Great to know that the younger generation still is interested in digging deeper into Sanatana Dharma logic and philosophy

  • @Tom-Studios
    @Tom-Studios 20 днів тому

    Poor people think better things great

  • @contemplativepursuits
    @contemplativepursuits 21 день тому

    Remarkable conversation from both sides 🙏

  • @prasantabagh432
    @prasantabagh432 25 днів тому

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @JeffEyges
    @JeffEyges 27 днів тому

    Wonderful episode. Such a lovely young couple. I'm looking forward to reading the book and to whatever they may write in future.

  • @Graviton-cc9bn
    @Graviton-cc9bn 29 днів тому

    The Ishwar (Omni god) is very different from paramshiva, Trika Acharyas constantly deny that the Ishwara category in Advaita is same as parashiva. It's actually as very big difference.

  • @Graviton-cc9bn
    @Graviton-cc9bn 29 днів тому

    Mukunda still doesn't have an in-depth knowledge about Trika. You are projecting vaishnavism into it.

  • @adeshsaxena6874
    @adeshsaxena6874 Місяць тому

    Thank you for hosting the series re status of Sanatan Dharm in the US. Growing up in India, most of us never got a systematic understanding of our own Faith. We simply cherry picked the concepts and practices of our immediate family. Being in the US we have to seek out deeper inquiry and answers, sort of often self taught. It is important to interpret Hinduism, from a distance, if not an "outsider". The environment here is more open, and less likely to be challenged by " senas" and other assorted " guardians." It is important to find a faith that allows an individual to balance faith with the evolving social structure.

  • @user-tt8no7jn3g
    @user-tt8no7jn3g Місяць тому

    Have to watch it more than once to grasp it

  • @hrangkhol9057
    @hrangkhol9057 Місяць тому

    Bring back Rami Sivan 🙏🏻🏃

  • @vasukinagabhushan
    @vasukinagabhushan Місяць тому

    Apart from the three major Vedantic commentaries, teachings of Saankhya-Yoga Darshan in Bhagwad Gita should be explored and presented. Sadly, for more than a millennia, Vedantins have suppressed realist Darshanas like Saankhya and Vaisheshika Darshanas. 🙏🏽🕉️🙏🏽

  • @rattangujadhur8215
    @rattangujadhur8215 Місяць тому

    Two gyanis kicking back and having an illuminating conversation ! I love the freedom and humility of these guys what a gift to all of us

  • @samewalt6486
    @samewalt6486 Місяць тому

    Really fascinating. I'm going to get his book. I came here from reading about his translation of the Hanuman Chalisa into singable English.

  • @politics4270
    @politics4270 Місяць тому

    🎉🎉

  • @VV-sb1im
    @VV-sb1im Місяць тому

    Hello Ashish and Mukunda Iam not a genetist, but I read anthropology, genetics ect.. I have a question does Y chromosome alone give a complete picture about identity. Shouldnt poly genes be considered for shaping a civilization. In addition if somebody has similar haplogroup to groups far away does thst mean all other anthropogical features are similar. For example ashkenazi jews may have eastern European haplogroup like R1a but nowhere they claim they are Europeans. So my thought is the claim of a relation does not come by only Y but may be poly genes. For example brahmin have various haplogroup with probably r1a, j ect yet they identify themselves as brahmins. Also wanted to mention something quite interesting, i was watching V.S ramachandran lectures on neurons that shaped civilization. The next question which will arise how are neurons related to genetics, if that is the case there needs to poly genes for shaping civilization. How do you conlude on this.

  • @VICKBALAJI
    @VICKBALAJI Місяць тому

    6 minutes of chitchat 😢

  • @yuaksr
    @yuaksr Місяць тому

    Спасибо большое за столь увлекательную беседу!

  • @harlanmueller7499
    @harlanmueller7499 Місяць тому

    When speaking of the baby Krishna, I think you have tapped into what true Christians feel about Jesus as God

  • @-BaNaPa
    @-BaNaPa 2 місяці тому

    Excellent Dr.Anusha Rao..superb narration impeccable grip on Madhwa Tatva

  • @-BaNaPa
    @-BaNaPa 2 місяці тому

    Hari Sarvottmatatvam is mere Madhwa philosophy !!

  • @exerjiexerji289
    @exerjiexerji289 2 місяці тому

    How humbling! Hats off to Dr T S Rukmani. I hope the book she intended for her grandkids is nearing completion. It will be a treasure for all of ua

  • @laurenc6859
    @laurenc6859 2 місяці тому

    OMG. I have been looking for discussions like this. Where can I find more? Thank you so much.

  • @Kriyavas1
    @Kriyavas1 2 місяці тому

    Professor Bryant is such a joy and a blessing. I have been reading Dr Bryant’s Bhakti Yoga, it is a dense deep dive into the Bhakti tradition, I highly recommend it for any serious student of Bhakti or Dr Bryant. Namaste

  • @AHAMAHAM-ej7nr
    @AHAMAHAM-ej7nr 2 місяці тому

    Very nice conversation! But I am confused on a few points. What does Dr Bryant mean when he says that the texts of other religions might also be shastras? How are we to reconcile the contradictions between these different shastras? How are we supposed to accept a text which says something like "I thy Lord am a jealous God, thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not bow before any graven image" with texts like the Bhagavatam which assert that Bhagavan is not only infinitely beautiful but has a mutlitude of forms and can be worshipped through images? If we are supposed to accept that all these different philosophies are equally true and lead to equally valid (though different) experiences, then why even have bhakti? If everything is true, then anything is true, and there is no distinction between truth and falsehood. Furthermore, Dr. Bryant says that Hindu philosophies leave the origins of suffering open-ended by saying its due to anaadi karma or maya but that is alright since their priority is to offer a way out of suffering. But how can you put an end to suffering without inquiring into its causes? In fact, Buddhism does seek to put an end to suffering by understanding its causes - i.e. human desires and attachments. It makes sense for the Buddha to say he is uninterested in the origins of the universe because that has no relevance to his project of eradicating suffering, just like a physician doesn't need to know who shot an arrow to remove it. But that analogy cannot be applied to Dr. Bryant's case since the Buddha is not agnostic about the origins of suffering itself. In fact, to build on the analogy, a physician has to see how the arrow has penetrated the flesh in order to best determine how to extract it. Similarly, how can any darshana provide an effective solution to the problem of suffering without providing a convincing account of its origins? On the contrary, by proposing that the world is created by an all-loving and all-attractive Ishvara, bhakti philosophies open up a new can of worms. Why would such an all-loving Bhagavan create a world with "sarvam duhkham" as Dr. Bryant claims. And if this suffering is anaadi, or worse the result of Bhagavan's own maya, then what is the guarantee it will end through devotional surrender to Bhagavan? Finally, what does Mukunda ji mean when he says that the historicity of avataarapurushas like Rama and Krishna is unimportant to modern Hinduism? They might be unimportant to other Hindus but to a bhakta, who claims that not only is there a loving God with infinite beauty and forms but that said God took birth in human form for the liberation of his bhaktas and that knowledge about such a God can be attained through shastra pramanas like the Bhagavatam, Ramayana, Mahabharata etc., wouldn't it be important that shastra pramana agrees with scientifically verifiable facts? After all the bhakti of a bhakta does not merely depend on the rasa and emotive-literary qualities of the text but rather on the truth of the fact that Bhagavan exists and shall descend "yuge-yuge".

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee Місяць тому

      I think professor Bryant is a bit more liberal when it comes to accepting the validity of other religions. As a Vaishnava, you usually are convinced of Lord Vishnu's supremacy based on your reading and understanding of the shastras but he takes more of a Hindu approach that says: All gods are same. Of course, I disagree with him on this but I guess he has a few different beliefs from his lineage of Vaishnavism.

  • @prasenjitghosh5852
    @prasenjitghosh5852 3 місяці тому

    Sri Ramakrishna said one who is nirguna is also saguna, Brahman-Shakti abhed (inseparable). Regarding salvation (final goal) he gave 2 broad categories : 1. Those who want to become sugar (Merge in nirguna) 2. Those who want to eat sugar (Eternal relation with Saguna) . Sri Ramakrishna's Kathaamrita provides very simple yet sophisticated framework to harmonize different school of thoughts. He didn't create hierarchy between Jnana and Bhakti, according to him both are at same level

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      Both cannot be at the same level. According to our bhakti tradition, the experience of one's own atman is like a droplet compared to the experience of the source of the atman, bhagavan, which like a whole ocean.

    • @prasenjitghosh5852
      @prasenjitghosh5852 2 місяці тому

      @mayanksharma6927 Right, as per Bhakti tradition Bhakti is higher. As per Jaina tradition Jaina is higher. As per Sri Ramakrishna, both are valid states of salvation. The path one follows depends on ones temperament. Although, Sri Ramakrishna used to say that Bhakti is more suitable for Kali Yuga

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      ​@@prasenjitghosh5852Yes everything's valid, we do not reject jñana mārga where the goal is the experience of one's svarūpa. However, it doesn't solve anything. In the bhāgavatam, there are examples of fall-down from that state of sat-cit-ānanda and those beings being satiated only by the experience of bhagavān's rūpa. So in that way, it is the highest, which Krishna confirms in the Gita (Refer to Chapter 12))

  • @prasenjitghosh5852
    @prasenjitghosh5852 3 місяці тому

    Awesome Discussion !

  • @mjjbskfanatic
    @mjjbskfanatic 3 місяці тому

    Again, just outstanding editing! Kudos, really.

  • @kumarakantirava429
    @kumarakantirava429 3 місяці тому

    This discussion is really really Scholarly. Thank You very much Mukunda Ji & Dr Edwin Bryant.

  • @Sankhyame
    @Sankhyame 3 місяці тому

    1:05:22 interesting discussion from a few minutes before this. About the Vaishnav idea of God. However, Krishna traditions such as Gaudiya Vaishnavism becomes so prakritic in their idea of nitya lilas. Gaudiya Vaishnavism becomes very erotic in nature in their internal texts written by their gurus, resembles very prakritic experiences of love, sex, and eroticism. So I'd say, there could be a God with form, but it doesn't make sense if God has these nitya lilas consisting of eroticism, etc.

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      You've missed the whole point. The madhurya bhava is not for neophytes and it's not like mundane material love. The sadhakas are extremely strict about it. In fact, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and many of his disciples themselves were celibate monks so how can you claim that they promote such things? Prabhupada in his purports makes it clear that the madhurya bhava is very rare in the sadhakas and is acheived after several lifetimes of shudhha bhakti, after which the sadhaka gets a gopi bhava and this is just one of the many bhavas. You can worship Krishna with any bhava as long as it is pure and immaterial, not for mundane sense enjoyment and is transcendental. This is why most people are not advised to read the lilas, an impure mind only sees impurity. Just like one cannot describe the atman to the one who has not experienced it. One cannot truly understand the lilas if they haven't loved Krishna in a pure and innocent way. In fact, this is how the bhagavatam describes the rasa lila, like an innocent child laughing and playing with his own reflection in the mirror.

    • @Sankhyame
      @Sankhyame 2 місяці тому

      @@akrishnadevotee thanks for your reply. I'm quite well aware of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, so I'm not missing any point. I hope we'll have a nice discussion on this topic. I suspect if Gaudiya Vaishnavas have read the philosophy of Upanishads and even Yoga Sutra for that matter. Although Baladeva Vidyabhusan has wrote a bhasya on Vedanta Sutra, it is radically different than Gaudiya Vaishnavism that is taught by Shad-Goswamis in their literature, where many philosophical truths of Upanishads are contradicted. Let me give you an example. Yoga Sutra 1.5 talks about klishta (unfavorable) and aklishta (favorable) vrittis. Ultimately, one has to go beyond both klishta and aklishta vrittis in order to attain asamprajanta samadhi or Moksha, as these vrittis are still prakritic in nature. Gaudiya Vaishnavas have simply imposed aklishta (favorable) vrittis on their idea of God, Radha Krsna. The point I'm trying to make is, Upanishads and Yoga Sutra talk about going beyond avidya, samaskras, and prakritic experiences. However, all those erotic pastimes (where Gaudiya literature show Krsna engaging in sexual pastimes with Radha and gopis for eternity in so-called nitya-lilas), these invented Gaudiya literature are simply based on prakritic experience of this world rather than spiritual world, which is beyond one's imagination. Now here comes the real problem, Gaudiya Vaishnavas teachers claim to base their school of thought Achintya Bhedbheda on Vedanta tradition, but what they preach is completely antithetical to the basic Vedantic philosophy.

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      @@Sankhyame Prabhupada has extensively talked about Sahajīyas, which are not part of Gauḍiya philosophy. Purāṇas with sensual descriptions of the līlās are also not accepted by Gaudiya Ācāryas. In fact, Satyanārāyaṇa dasā bābājī wrote a whole blog post about the interpolations in the shastras and how many of these intimate līlās do not find any references in the authoritative texts in the paramparā. While you're right that these look prākṛtik in nature, sages practicing gopī bhāva explain these līlās in their own way. It is said that the acāryas would sometimes be so lost in samādhī that when they would open their eyes, they’d sometimes have a beetle-nut in their mouth, having experienced these līlās. In the theology, the material world is seen as a distorted reflection of the spiritual world, so it’s not rare to see such materially motivated perceptions, in fact, I would agree with you because madhurya bhāva is transcendental and not meant for everyone, especially jīvas like us who might mistake it for material lust. I personally do not know any ācāryas that support such mundane views towards these transcendental līlās. In fact, Professor Bryant talked about this in his bhagavatam lectures, how it’s easy to misunderstand these topics and they’re not meant for every bhakta.

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      There might be some souls who have gone in the wrong direction with this, very much like the sahajīyas, we can do nothing for them except pray that they can find purity and true love.

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      @@Sankhyame Also, I’d say that you’re imposing the views of sāṁkhya on bhakti traditions. The practice of sāṁkhya is very different from bhakti. I’d highly recommend watching Edwin Bryant’s sāṁkhya svādhyāya. Saying this as a fan of sāṁkhya and a Kṛṣṇa bhakta myself.

  • @Ragnar638
    @Ragnar638 3 місяці тому

    His background is fake, made using green screen. So is his intentions to study the hindu philosophy and culture. His aims are to inculcate the hindu culture and make christianity more appealing in a hindu context.

  • @DrParmar
    @DrParmar 3 місяці тому

    Very nice conversation. Hope to see more in future.

  • @vijaybharani8035
    @vijaybharani8035 3 місяці тому

    I wanted to ask anusha who talked on dvaita, about nirgunatva of the jeeva . If god dosent possess the prakrutic gunas so he is nirguna. Arent jeevas nirgunas in terms of devoid of prakrutic gunas too at there swaroopa ?

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      Yes that is correct. brahmavit brahmaiva bhavati. This is partly the reason why everyone in Vaikunṭha looks like Lord Viṣṇu. Their minds are so absorbed in bhagavān that their whole existence becomes nothing but godly, free from all dualities and only focused on love and service towards their lord.

  • @PavaniGanga
    @PavaniGanga 3 місяці тому

    💛🙏💛 So grateful to both of you.

  • @martinemiliorosana
    @martinemiliorosana 3 місяці тому

    I'm only half trough the podcast and I have to pause it in order to relish on what has been said. Thank you so much Mr. Raghavan, I'm a big fan of the channel, but this time you really hit it out the field with your questions, and is always such a pleasure to listen to Dr.Bryant and see how his passion for the subject channels his profound knowledge. Also from my humble point of view I'm hundred percent with you on bhakti being the other side of the coin with jñana, Ramanuja explicitly states it about the end of his Vedharthasamgraha "bhaktisca jñanavisesa eva iti", Bhakti is just a kind of knoledge. To love is to know.Thank you so much again.

  • @sandhyas7494
    @sandhyas7494 3 місяці тому

    Though Bhagavad Gita is seen as a Bhakti Shastra, the bhakti schools still had to contend with the vedic statement, that says only Jnana leads to liberation. Ramanujacharya frames it as Jnana in the form of Bhakti . Madhvacharya too agrees that Jnana is the path to Moksha. However interpretation of final stage of Jnana varies.

    • @vijaybharani8035
      @vijaybharani8035 3 місяці тому

      I have heard that it's Because bakthi is effect and it's cause is gyana, from a dvaitic point.

    • @akrishnadevotee
      @akrishnadevotee 2 місяці тому

      Bhakti involves jñana. If you do not know your love, is it really love? The gopīs are the ultimate examples of śuddha bhaktas. They did not have any jñana, but they probably had to go through it in their past lives, being revered sages. However, bhakti does not necessarily demand jñana if the person has bhāva. It’s because we know that bhakti is causeless and secondly, many of us have been performing bhakti and developing jñana for several lives. Mādhava sampradāya gives importance to jñana for mokśa but it’s not so for Śri or other sampradāyas where bhakti is seen as an efficient cause for mokśa (although true bhaktas don’t even want that for purification purposes)

  • @TheConduit10
    @TheConduit10 3 місяці тому

    Christians and to some extent muslims , have to be brought down to show due reverence to Sanatan Dharma

  • @sumitdutta7043
    @sumitdutta7043 3 місяці тому

    20:40 the similar kind of thing is Ramkrishna Paramhamsa's philosophy of Vijnana Vedanta as per Swami Medhananda.

  • @mjjbskfanatic
    @mjjbskfanatic 3 місяці тому

    Awesome episode! And really impressive editing. Kudos to whoever did it!

  • @justinrozario2003
    @justinrozario2003 3 місяці тому

    Easily, one of the best episodes yet! I've been waiting for this one for months now

  • @obaidulhaque7687
    @obaidulhaque7687 3 місяці тому

    ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkxtSPBem_-Fdra2d7spwFg_mllrk6y_2s- What happen to early Islam ☪️- And understanding of QURAN

  • @skhandavalli
    @skhandavalli 3 місяці тому

    Beautifully explained Advaitha using modern science ua-cam.com/video/BG31Oz0VWmI/v-deo.htmlsi=m4TzmF7vcby4ifHk

  • @Shri
    @Shri 3 місяці тому

    2:00:40 Regarding changing traditions one has to remember that it was the same Lord Vishnu who showed in his Rama Avatara that upholding an Oath is paramount and breaking it would be as good as Death, while in his Krishna Avatara showed that one has to break Oath to uphold Dharma (when he picks up the chariot wheel to annihilate Bhishma). When God is himself showing that traditions that don't match with the Time has to be broken, who are we to still hold on to traditions that are obviously ridiculous in today's day and age?

    • @raghavrao7689
      @raghavrao7689 3 місяці тому

      Good excuse to selectively pick and choose incidents that suit one's own character and claim support from purana and shastras

    • @Shri
      @Shri 3 місяці тому

      ​@@raghavrao7689 Claim what support? These are not "selectively picked and chosen". The entirety of Mahabharata is about people sticking to their Oaths and succumbing one by one to Adharma because they were unwilling to break their Oaths to protect Dharma. To the point where they were mute spectators to the disrobing of the Queen of Indraprastha. This is what happens when you stop using your brain and start becoming Dogmatic. It is only Lord Krishna, in the entire epic of Mahabharata, who shows that it is okay to break an Oath if it comes in the way of upholding Dharma. The kind of people who existed during Lord Rama's time did not exist in 28th Dwapara Yuga when Mahabharata happened. When the Pandavas were banished for 12 years + 1 year of anonymity did Dhritarashtra die of depression due to separation? No he did not. While in 23rd Treta Yuga, Dashratha could not bear the separation of Lord Rama. Did Dhritarashtra rule Hastinapur like how Bharata ruled Ayodhya when Rama was exiled? No he did not. Bharata kept Rama's footwear on the Throne and waited for his return. Dhritarashtra was ecstatic that Pandu imposed self-exile on himself on account of killing Rishi Kindama and his wife. You can literally draw direct parallels between both Epics and see how the response to tragic events were totally different in both. There is a clear deterioration of Dharma between both Yugas and that deterioration is becoming even more apparent now in Kali Yuga. Philosophical constructs don't change and are Eternal but Ritual constructs change over time. If not, we would still be sacrificing live animals in our Yajnas. Madhvacharya would not have stopped Pashu Bali and replaced it with offering Pishta Pashu if not for acknowledging that it is not required for this Yuga.

    • @raghavrao7689
      @raghavrao7689 3 місяці тому

      @@Shri Comparison between Dhritarashtra and Bharat need not be extrapolated as effect of decline of Dharma over yugas. You can just explain it as difference between two different people with different svabhava. I think the takeaway should be - do not make oaths that can hinder dharma rather than saying "who are we to still hold on to traditions that are obviously ridiculous in today's day and age'. Everyday is a new day. In this age, change in the outside world occurs much faster than in the past. One can easily be influenced by what we see on the outside. But, on the inside , Soul grows slowly. What I meant is that with such an outlook one can do away with both dharma and traditions/oaths etc...to justify one's own actions as per one's own character. That definitely should not be the takeaway from the scriptures.

  • @Shri
    @Shri 3 місяці тому

    1:48:30 Dr Anusha missed adding to your very important point Mr Mukunda that Draupadi is essentially 5 Strees in 1 body, and the main controller is Bharati - consort of Vayu. Hence why Yudhishtira goes to her for understanding Dharma because she is essentially on the same level as Saraswati in the Taratamya. You will get to understand more on Draupadi if you read Madhvacharya's Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya.

  • @bhavyagupta5569
    @bhavyagupta5569 3 місяці тому

    00:01:20 Introduction to Dr. Seema Anand and her background, a family of strong and supportive women. Growing up without much background in Hindu literature but over time developing a drive for it. 00:06:55 “Stories you tell define your Identity” and Dr. Anand’s move towards the Kama Shastras, her love for the Kama Shastras and the depth they have 00:10:45 Kama Sutra as being more than a book of sex but rather about a text about seduction, pleasure and spirituality. The contrast between the Christian view of sexuality and the Hindu view of sexuality 00:17:30 The Lost Love Festivals of India, putting the pleasure back into the earth 00:22:10 Pleasure isn’t just sex rather it is the organic and connected experience of existence; The supplement of traditional mores with colonial mores. Orientalism, academia and interpretation 00:33:55 Mudras in relation to Seduction and Dance, The role of Paan in ancient India and love communication 00:37:55 Courtesans in the time of Chanakya, regulation of prostitution 00:43:15 What elements of the ancient world would Dr. Anand bring back and the perception/portrayal of Women in Bollywood 00:50:00 Role of Women in the Itihasa traditions, how we portray Sita today versus how the Ramayana portrays Sita and how Draupadi is portrayed in the Mahabharata 01:11:00 The Art of Storytelling 01:22:00 The works of Kalidasa 01:25:00 What role can Kama play in today’s world 01:29:40 Ancient and Modern Femininism 01:43:30 Dr. Anand’s final thoughts

    • @merumedia4249
      @merumedia4249 3 місяці тому

      Thank you for the timestamps, I'll update the episode with it! I truly appreciate it, it is listeners like you who help that make this possible

  • @skhandavalli
    @skhandavalli 3 місяці тому

    Another great teacher Rupert Spira on Non Duality ua-cam.com/video/BwXosKVO2yI/v-deo.htmlsi=sqgLKbu_826R5UFv

  • @skhandavalli
    @skhandavalli 4 місяці тому

    Here is another great guru of non duality (Advaitha) ua-cam.com/video/1Rs3OyJD9xU/v-deo.htmlsi=fp1LYw8Z2NAdcHWT

  • @skhandavalli
    @skhandavalli 4 місяці тому

    Sarvapriyananda is a world-renowned Advaita Guru, Please understand the difference between Dwaita & Advaita from him ua-cam.com/video/ENWCcuEyIBA/v-deo.htmlsi=9n9dK8XjeXGNOT9z