Відео

Can't wait:)

These assets are of really good quality, but the number of other unnecessary things that were installed with them terrified me, so I thought that such a video would probably be useful to many people:) So I'm glad it was useful to you too:)

Thank you:)

Thank you:)

Don't worry about asking questions, I'm happy to help:) First, check what shader is used in the materials that are pink. If it is a standard Unity shader, then you can simply use the converter built into Unity to change the shader to one that works in your render pipeline. However, if it is a custom shader, check if the asset does not have a support pack that will replace the shaders with the appropriate ones. As a last resort, you can try using a shader from another pack for the material, because very often it can be done and everything works fine:)

You're welcome:) Y2B doesn’t always recommend smaller channels to new viewers, so I'm glad this video was suggested to you:)

You probably clicked by accident and created a regular "render texture" and in this case it must be a "custom render texture" is slightly lower than the one you chose:)

Thank you:) This asset, due to the fact that it consists of a huge number of elements, is suitable for creating many different structures, the only thing missing is the collapsed versions of the walls and it would be perfect:) but you can't have everything:)

That’s very kind of you, thank you:)

Thank you:)

I’m glad the scene had such an impact on you:)

Great to hear the video came in handy:)

I'm so glad this was helpful for you:)

You simply don't have additional options displayed in Light/Fog ect:) Select Directional Light > Em ission Tab and click on the 3 dots icon and select "Show Additional Properties":) Do the same in Fog Volume:) Unity has a lot of useful options hidden in almost every component:)

@@SetaLevelDesign You're awesome! Thank you :) One more question..... Which asset is the "Volumetric Samples/Fog Volume Shadergraph" and prefabs in? Where can I get it? As soon as they are completely finished, I will post them on my channel...of course marked, I copied them from you :) I don't plan to have a youtub channel, just so you can see.... and see the difference you make in your projects... Yours is alive :) Thanks a lot for everything and I learned a lot from you again... :)

@@imogames77 Thank you for your kind words:) In the Package Manager, select Unity Registry > High Definition RP and there you have the Samples tab. Import Volumetric Samples and you will have those samples:) I can't wait, I always like to see other people's work inspired by my ideas:)

I'm sorry but I didn't fully understand your question. Could you elaborate on it?

@@SetaLevelDesign i want to make unity game map with terrain so i dont wanna problem of contraction when i use this type of map, does it make contraction problem in the game?? do you know about something??

Thank you:)

It would be necessary to add wind support to the shader, and unfortunately this is often a problem. Sometimes shaders from other packages work properly with models that do not include wind support:)

I'm glad that the video appeared just when you needed it:) I hope it was useful:)

In Unity 6 it works exactly the same, the only difference is that Blend Distance is shown in the scene window, but for now I am staying away from 6 because unfortunately it is terribly bugged at the moment:/

free preferably

@@HamasMahroof When it comes to free assets work in URP or Build-in: - Unity Terrain - URP Demo Scene (lots of grass models and some trees, works in URP but you can replace some shaders with ones that work in Build-in) - Conifers [BOTD] (trees work in both URP and Build-in) - Book Of The Dead (stones and cliffs work in build-in, you just need to change the shader to Standard) I also recommend: - The Toby Foliage Engine / Light (grass, trees, bushes, and shaders can be used in other vegetation models that do not support build-in) :)

@@SetaLevelDesign thank you for the help

I'm glad the video was useful to you:)

I'm really glad I could help:) It’s awesome to hear that the tutorial was useful for your project:)

Thank you:) I'm glad you liked it:)

I'm glad you enjoyed it:)

In the future, there will definitely be more tutorials about HDRP optimization:)

I covered this a bit in the video about adding grass, but I'll definitely prepare some tutorial about terrain opitimization:)

@@SetaLevelDesign cool

Please ​@@SetaLevelDesign

You're welcome:)

It all depends on what type they are. You can definitely give them as occludee and see if there is any change:)

With open worlds where there's a lot of vegetation, it can be challenging to achieve better FPS without some external solutions like Nature Renderer/Foliage Renderer. Unfortunately, Unity still struggles to handle large amounts of vegetation well. In HDRP, the terrain is set as an occluder by default, but it’s best to check how it affects your project. Also, take a look at my tutorial about grass, you might find something useful there to optimize your project. Just make sure to test it on a project copy, as changing things like detail resolution per patch can disrupt the placement of already distributed vegetation models:)

I hope the tutorial didn't disappoint you:)

Thank you:)

There will be another video with URP soon:) I prefer HDRP because it has many more features than URP, including volumetric effects, SS effect, much more override when it comes to post-processing, etc. Of course, all this at the cost of performance because let's not kid ourselves, HDRP was designed to create things only for High-end devices. URP has an advantage in optimization and will work without a problem on most devices. So it really depends on what kind of user we are aiming at. I wanted to get the most realistic environment in Unity and in URP it can be difficult, so that's why I chose HDRP. I think Unity will get rid of Build-in sooner than HDRP, because URP and HDRP are not similar, which cannot be said about URP and Build-in:)

@@SetaLevelDesign Thanks for your reply. I was wondering if a nice scene as yours can be replicated in URP that will be played as an FPS game at 60 fps on a normal PC? Do you think it can be achieved?

I'm glad it was useful:)

I'm glad it was useful:)

Thank you:)

I think it's more a matter of the fact that I used this asset for the first time, and there are a lot of changes in it compared to the 2019 version. So I think that over time I will be able to make the water look more realistic:)

In Unity, you control frustum culling through the near and far clipping planes in the camera settings. But see also Occlusion Culling because it may be more useful in your case:)

You have it described in detail at 4:22 :)

Thank you:) Currently I have an i7-7700, 16GB RAM, GTX 1060 but it would be best to have 32 RAM and an RTX 40xx:)

Thx:) I'm glad my video solves your problems:)

The URP environment works similarly to HDRP, but it lacks some things that improve the visual side, such as volumetric lighting. However, despite everything, you can also make a nice enviro in URP, for example like in the video "The Four Guardians" on the channel:)

Is it URP better to make a game FPS or HDRP ?

Maybe one day I'll do something in Unreal, but somehow I'm better at Unity, even though Unity is visually worse than Unreal:)

@@SetaLevelDesign I don't think that you should say it worse. Unity is suitable for all types of games (including graphics one). Whereas unreal is better for realistic graphics, but it will not be suitable for all devices.

@@Vidhyanshugaming22 As you write, Unity has a lot of advantages compared to Unreal, but in my statement I was talking about visual aspects, for example lighting which is much better in Unreal:)

@@SetaLevelDesign Yes I understand but unity is not worse in visual aspects! It is a bit behind unreal in terms of advanced technologies for rendering and graphics (ex- nanite and lumen).

​@@SetaLevelDesignCan you make a video on Realtime Global Illumination with beautiful environment please 🙏