Відео

1:12:56 CO open shoves a big portion of range despite BB has 50BB stack - is this correct? This is very counter-intuitive

FANTASTIC

Great conversation gents, well done!

Arrogance isn’t associated with Daniel Cates is it lol😅

For the stalling a group of regs could start wearing a badge and stop stalling to spread the word and give the right example. When a group does something it's way more powerful than any other (non-violent) method that doesn't involve changing the rules.

Stevey didnt read that book, he has a tell

42:22 wow

1:26:02 jus cb your range and take it from there

My suggestion would be that you guys shouldn’t invest in running sims and creating libraries of MTT sims. I think there is plenty out there and you are entering a crowded market. You don’t really have any unique selling point when it comes to the sim library. The way you differentiate is via either investing in alternate methodology for MTT sims ( hint: FGS) or focus solely on some form of subscribing based coaching model.

i fkin love rumukulus i think, ty guys <3

I think you're mistaking Mystery Hand, which means that the viewers don't know one hand until it is over, with Linus not looking at his hand. Unless you know better. Maybe check with him.

That AA fold is more an indictment on Roman's view on Jaffee. He's basically saying you underbluff spots/ lack creativity to find these lines as bluffs. There's no other reason to make such a deviation from what he knows is a theoretical sigh call.

22:09 you guys over looked the most interesting part of this spot. QQ is indifferent to jamming as well!!! I think you guys can make a whole theory video on this concept. Jaffe’s size is neither here nor there. You may say that jamming and small donk and x is same EV but that’s a very narrow way of looking at it. On river there are very clear and specific tendencies and range shape that lead clear exploits. However it’s so dependent on the opponent. Romans fold is good. I think he made a very clear exploitative fold but it would be interesting as to what he thought Jaffe’/s mistake was. In my head I’m thinking, if Jaffe has a trip he is either going small or huge.if he has a bluff he less likely to go for a small bet there. So I would imagine 50% is bluff weighted

Can you guys at some point talk about bankroll management, variance, mind set and meta

47:00 Saying he’s very spiritual gave it away lol

Fox News isn't something a normal personal should have to apologize for criticizing if it's standards are low AF....I'm ex military and it does very few favors that aren't ultimately self seeking....the problem is that CNN has stooped from having enough standards that can't easily been torn apart for a similar thing....

Hey Jonathan, Really loving the podcast. Just a little bit of feedback it would be great if you could read out the hand analysis and often go over the board texture at each street. Often I am listening to these in the car or on a run. Thanks mate.

jungle: most annoying: seiver

Great, wonderful, awesome, sick... words aren't enough to describe this podcast! Jon please more strategy even if you hate it lol! Keep it up guys 🔥🔥

Great interview , thank you

The way he spoke about the precision vs accuracy and the node tree at each decision has changed my whole thought process of doing the GTO Wizard trainer 🤯

Why he act so serious and intimidating when play poker not fun for recreational players bad for growing game be friendly and fun!

Love the Vervaeke shout out. As both an MTT grinder and someone who watched all the lectures as they came out in 2019 (and countless other hours of Vervaeke) quite heartening to hear ya'll discuss. At the time felt I was on a bit of an island as I tried getting the other poker guys in my circle to watch (but it is a big ask). And it did also make me very seriously question what meaning there actually is to be found in the poker grind, something for which 5 years on I still don't have a great answer. I'm curious how others square that circle.

I tried to DM Ike this question on Twitter, but apparently you have to have a premium subscription in order to DM people. So, hoping Ike might see this somehow: I've heard Ike say on a couple of occasions, when discussing the state of current poker solvers, that (a) we know that for heads up NLHL, counterfactual regret minimization (CRM) trends towards an equilibrium, but (b) for multiplayer NLHL, we don't actually know whether the solutions that the solvers are outputting are correct. I'm curious what exactly he means by this? Is the problem that we can't prove that CRM trends towards an equilibrium for multiplayer NLHL? Or is it rather it doesn't make sense to use CRM for multiplayer NLHL? (and if so, why?) On a different podcast, I think I also heard Ike say that it doesn't even make sense to talk about equilibrium strategies in the context of multiplayer NLHL, but I'm curious why he thinks this too. I'm not much of an expert on game theory, but as far as I'm aware, it has been proven that there are multiplayer games for which equilibrium strategies can be devised namely using CRM. So, what makes him think that it doesn't make sense for multiplayer NLHL? Anyway, I'm genuinely curious about these questions (and in no way suggesting that Ike is wrong -- he may very well be right). I just really would like to know if someone could point me to some sources for these claims as I'd very much like to read them. Apologies for any inconvenience.

indeed more about climbing next pod plz. this was great

Not to give the editors too much work, but it would be cool if you could put links in the description of the lectures/author's/books you talk about. I could just be being lazy though😅

These have been great and much appreciated. Both the guests and hearing your mind Jonathan 🙏🏻

These podcasts are ridiculously good - please keep them coming. Would love to see Mikita / Tim Adams / Dan Smith / Koon

Hi Jaffe, amazing guest!!! Hey, do you live in a tinyhouse?

Can you put these on Spotify?

solver is 55/45 calling and both are happy with the fold to the point of pureness ? what am i missing boys ?

These get better and better, love it. Great job boys!

Just want to commend you on a great interview. Really good questions that provoked thoughtful and interesting responses. And loved the Phil, Phil or Phil segments. Really unique and cool way to expand a conversation. Hats off, def earned a sub! 👏👏👏

Jaffe why are you talking so fucking much. We want Chadwick not YOU!!!!!!

Two poker Kings talking shop... poker aside, a gem of a conversation! thank you

"Are you on a computer a lot?" "Nah...a bit of poker but that's it." "Read me the top line." "King...Jack...deuce." ".......a *bit* of poker?"

Try get DavyJones on here now that he is playing the Triton stops 🙏🏼🙏🏼

I follow stevie since the stars prime days, I remember he used to have a finger pointed to the eye crossing the nose picture 😂

Sooooo sloooooow

great interview Chidwick seems like a stand up dude and a awesome player

Fantastic stuff

Stephen is a genius, I am a fan. Jonathan you do great in these interviews, thanks for the content!

One of the GOATs - nice interview

tragedy of the commons is the term you were looking for re: the type of problem stalling is

Hey all, sorry about my sound quality in this episode...Will try to do better going forward

Woah didn’t know Mr.clean was a poker expert🔥