Відео

Hey! I just discovered your own videos, and haven't fully watched them yet, but it appears we sort of had the same idea. 😁

List the bird like features so we don't just have to take your word. It's science so show science please.

Great stuff

22:35 They're actually 13 billion different.

They are found with modern mammals. In collections, lol!

Good stuff. {:o:O:}

"Loss of sonic hedgehog limb-specific enhancers" sounds like you lost a power-up on Sega.

"Funcational"? 😁

Huh, I thought lungfish had whole genome duplications.

They're engineering bacteria too have the smallest possible genome🙂

The imagery of all the little diatoms living in tiny glass houses is thoroughly charming.

Zach B Hancock has published a video, "Junk DNA ... it's a thing", on this topic. Fascinating stuff !!

I wonder if there is a correlation between genome size and how long a specific lineage has existed on Earth.

This is a tremendous question for those that think all genetic "information" is there for a functional reason. For them it's far-fetched to think it's a result of deep ancestry and viral inserts. 400 million years is a long time to stack up DNA through all the known processes.

Hi, where do I find the investigation of the claims of the movie? Would be interesting to watch. Christ love! ✝️

They looked like as ..., do Carl just suggested that evolution have taken place?

I love that Dr. Duff is taking off the gloves. Creationists have shown over and over they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

In all things, the only thing we can observe is sets of causality and effects in result. Their is nothing we can observe, through the senses or science that is expected to have no cause or be the effect of such cause. Yet atheists Darwinists have no cause for the apparition of life. It was just random. So how can we only stop expecting causality in the origine of all things while everything in it is only birth in causalities? Obviously all things obey an order and atheists Darwinists have not come up with any fresh idea of what this order purpose is. We only have five senses to cognate the world. We know that some species have more senses. We also know that most other species have more accurate with broader reach senses. How are modern scientists ignoring this fact? Their is obviously things we won't ever know through the senses, through science. Before we ask who created the Creator, we need to come to ask why we were our self created. And to this question, only the religious have begun to speculate. Darwinists just are interested in moking them, yet remain incapable of knowing if they come or if they go. The Truth is not actually recognized for truth by science, experiment or repetitions anyway. It ever depend on a faithful choice. As we grow, we gain knowledge. We can predict things out of these learnings. But our cognition work also to refined itself through meditation/introspection. By the introversion analysis of experience can we link ideas and consolidate our awareness of reality. But also our awareness of what we ignore. Thtough this process, and following our priorities, we come to forge a vague representation of what the information we are looking for should look like. More or less consciously, following this effort of search or the priority it represent, attention engage in this search. When the information become available, it is rapidly absorbed integrated preciously and then further processed. Then it fill the ignorance and start binding with the notions we were aware of being missing but also with other we have not considered of value yet. It is really through this consolidation of awareness that we know the Truth. Not through science or others consolidation of their own awareness. No one is aware of what append way back. We only know that we just keep discovering order and causalities. Really morality is the one important thing about the book. Darwinists have no care in the World for those you love, those you may one day love or yourself. Like any sort of demon worshiper, you could all be culled they could not care less. Now if all those who believe in Jesus are absolute moron lunatic, they still do more for you and those you love then a Darwinist would ever do for such. If only for this cause, no one should undermine them. For if our defenders, no matter how idiotic, spare us battle fields, they spare us such detour of our own. Darwin and friends won't ever spare a minute for you and those you love. You are just a comical pile of compounds for them? Only Jesus saves.

When reading the Old Testament, you find that first the Creator is called Elohim. Few pages latter He is called Yaweh. Later on He is called God. I suggest that the evolution of these denomintions actually marking motions in the big adjustments in the ecosystems and changes in the directions of things following our very determined cruel intentions. And this is a very well proven fact.

The Genesis saying that God rested after the six day of the creation is not actually there to let us believe in creationism or into Darwinism. It is there to let us know that due to God omnipotence, He created a very balanced World with unimaginable efficiency for men to grasp. We are just still trying to bring it down. That is very telling of how great it was made and very very incapable we are.

You still claim that these species are modern with just as much religious base for it. The Genesis does not claim any such thing anyway. The process of the mass extinction is also a very hypothetical stand too. And it may be explaining why the species did not die from the same event or in the same ecosystems. Jesus told us that God work even on sabbath day. Using his miracle to support it. So in this way He provided an argument that species, as men keep causing harm to Harmony in the creation, needed God to fix it with new species as time goes in adaptation to the spiritual and ecological defining needs.

My grandfather served in the Second World War. According to Carl’s logic, I’m a veteran and can claim GI Bill benefits, right?

I read an article a while back on CMI’s website that I believe was by Carl Werner where he claimed that he witnessed “secular” paleontologists digging out west in Mesozoic rock throwing mammal and bird fossils aside because they didn’t align with “evolutionary dogma”, but I haven’t been able to find this article for years. If anyone finds it I’d be eternally grateful.

It's a small step from hypocrisy to outright lies, and hypocrisy is built into the abrahamic cults, so this is no surprise at all. One religion, three names, all hypocrites, all evil.

When you have a con-game that good , you have to do everything you can to protect it ...

I have a running hypothesis that creationists are allergic to comprehending certain words- 'like', 'resembles', and 'similar to '

Even if he were right, why are only 2.5% of mammals similar back then? (I guess you get to that. 🙂)

Hey if you dont have pictures of his skeletons next to those of modern you got nothing. As a guy pushing science then you should know that. You have nothing but you saying he is a liar and some colored pictures... That proves nothing other then you disagree with his evidence. Have you looked at the soft tissue found in Dinosaur bones. That in itself is evidence your timeline is completely wrong. You may want to do the right thing and show your evidence. You claiming he is wrong doesnt make him wrong. You have to prove he is with evidence. As far as things stand right now your the one lying you haven't looked at his books taken his pictures and compared them to anything else. So instead of acting like a creationist and just saying he is wrong show it if you think your right. It would be great for everyone.

I would love to see you sit down and run through with that creationist how that isn't a beaver at all, and doesn't even fit AiG's use of kind. They would probably get angry and say "it's just classification of fragmentary bones, so it can be whatever you want it to be, but taxonomy is NOT slipshot and the small details betray relationships. Superficial skimming of images on Google does not make you a taxonomist. You have to become well versed on a clade to become a successful taxonomist. You have to know all the small details. I am one so I'd know. We can't just place things into new taxonomic groups "because we want to" or "to support evolution".

Yeah sure.

It is amazing how bad the taxonomic/systematic ignorance is with 99% of creationists. Even with AiG's usage of kind-family, these dinosaur-era creatures do not even fall into those "kinds" that they claim they are. Not a single taxonomist on Earth would place them in modern mammal taxa. I wonder if the 1% of PhD creationists actually KNOW that and are knowingly lying to confuse their 99% readership, or do they actually think that creature is a BEAVER?

That "Apologetics 101" apparently claims that Werner proved that modern mammals lived alongside dinosaurs shows one of three possible things... 1) That they fail to understand the difference between a claim and a demonstration that something is true. 2) That they don't really care about the difference between a claim and demonstrating something to be true, at least not when it comes to appolgetics. 3) Both 1 and 2.

4:25 "kinda like" is doing some very heavy lifting here...

Sumerians that lived 8500 years ago understood science better then modern Christians

Ta Joel ....and ,unbelievably for me....ta also to AIG and CMI for publishing these articles. I doubt they'll have any effect on the more committed conspiracy theorists out there, but hopefully may help prevent these viruses from spreading.

Any attempt to claim "Noah's Flood" as historical fact shows the claimant to be either ignorant or dishonest.

When you step way back you might find a more empirical reason most step into these traps ... trepidation brings about change. Doubt and fear are both trepidations and God's laws of dynamics show things need to vibrate. In chemistry heat or the syntax Q stimulate these vibrations or changes

When you step way back you might find a more empirical reason most step into these traps ... trepidation brings about change. Doubt and fear are both trepidations and God's laws of dynamics show things need to vibrate. In chemistry heat or the syntax Q stimulate these vibrations or changes

Of course, most of us are not paleontologists. I can't go out into the field and do my own research. I will trust 99+% of paleontologists, though, before an organization that has "apologetics, ministries, genesis or Biblical" in their name. Of course, there were mammals in the Triassic, but not modern ones.

Rabbits in the Cambrian

Creationists lying? Impossible I say... they never ever make up ad hoc facts...

Liars for Jesus!.......Religion has turned their minds into a steaming pile of horse manure.

The "Jurassic beaver", Castorocauda, belongs to an extinct mammal group; it is not a beaver or even a rodent. In fact, Castorocauda is even more distantly related to beavers than the platypus is (just to choose another "beaver-tailed" animal to compare it to). I'm sure AiG wouldn't try to get away with calling a platypus part of the "beaver kind".

Some people are just born stew pid.

The fun thing about paleontology is that you never know what they'll find next but in over 200 years of dedicated digging, nobody has found a Jurassic Rabbit of a Triassic cow yet. If creationists want to make extraordinary claims, fine but they'll need extraordinary evidence to back it up and so far they have produced a lot of claims and no evidence.

You keep on speaking up against creationist disinformation, Dr. @Joel Duff! Many thanks to you!

Werner also claims that the extinct ammonites are the same as the modern Nautilus!

"A jellyfish was found in the same layer as dinosaur. Jellyfish live today alongside humans. It means dinosaurs lived with humans too!"

Where was this proto-platypus fossil found? The natural range of marsupials is the eastern range of the Indonesian archipelago to Australia, Antarctica (fossils only), South America and North America. There's no evidence of marsupials outside of these locations. It sounds like wishful thinking.🤨

About the claim that mammals living along side dinosaurs is being "hidden": I went to public schools in Michigan during the 80s and that was NOT hidden but was in textbooks. More recently the PBS kids series "Dinosaur Train" has shown multiple mammals existing with dinosaurs.