Відео

HOW OLD WAS ADAM ON THE FIRST DAY OF HIS LIFE? 1 DAY OLD. HOW OLD WAS HE PHYSICALLY WHEN CREATED! A FULL GROWN MAN! SO HE WAS MADE WITH BUILT IN AGE! YOU DONT THINK THE EARTH AND CREATION WOULD BE ANY DIFFERENT? DO YOU EVEN READ THE BIBLE?

Snelling does talk about the Dead Sea salt in the "Genesis Flood Revisited" book as being deposited catastrophically as a result of "intense volcanic and magmatic activity", among other arguments, with a reference to Austin, 1994. (It's hard to tell in the Kindle edition which reference that is, unless it's the Grand Canyon book.)

Excellent series from an excellent channel. {:o:O:}

Snelling is one of the YECs that I dislike the most. He doesn't honestly engage any of the data, there's no way to call what he does anything but lying.

As a YEC, duffy has given me much the think about. Does it change my stance on a young Earth? No, it does not. There is an explanation challenging all of duffys evidence that appear to discredit a young Earth. It simply has yet to be determined. The reason I say this is due to the massive amount of evidence that is highly suggestive of a young Earth and a catastrophic flood. Perhaps YEC scientists are skipping around some issues. But that does not make them liars. Duffy, himself, appears to also be skipping around some issues.

Apologists are so predictably dishonest.

Not to mention all the salt in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore west Africa and offshore Brazil and many other areas.

The problem with the young earth thing is how it's silly. Young earth ideas demand selective reading material.

Ah yes, Snelling. The geologist who is now making his money off of rationalizing YEC.T he same guy who apparently deliberately hid cracks in a rock formation (to support his YEC position) by putting students in front of them in a photo.

How can any geologist be correct, without also assuming that Revelation is in the past and not future prophecy?

Although this explanation is from a biologist, geology provides the timeline for biology and astrology. Does YEC provide a map of the Neocene, Myocene, and Cretaceous periods supposedly compressed into the pre-flood and post-flood segments? And, what layers are attributed to the early Creation? post-Creation? And, for the Dead Sea, where's the blackened fire-from-Heaven layer? K-T boundary?

"Young Earth theory is a lie : it's go against God's law of radioactive decays ( half lives for dating rocks ( Carbon 14, Potassium 40, Uranium and Lead decays...)

Gosh, a young earth creationist avoiding inconvenient data! Who would have imagined something like that could happen? Not me, nuh-uh

So they pretend fantasy stories can be peer reviewed in geology? Interesting. There was no flood, and they haven't solved the heat problem of 4.5 billion years of geology squished into one year.

🧂

Now can you do topo maps of the millennium kingdom when water pours from the temple to the Mediterranean and into the Dead Sea. My guess is it fills up so much it empties out into the gulf of Aqaba, thus allowing Jerusalem to be a port city.

He's so outrageous and over the top, at least on this point. He should have no credibility as he's a coy and disengenious young Earth creationist.

This is an argument from ignorance. And it doesn't work. Just because we don't know how rapid evolutionary changes can occur yet, it doesn't mean that it didn't occur. There is no definitive Scientific reason or law preventing such future Scientific discoveries.

I feel like you're playing somewhat of a rhetorical game here that misses or ignores the points. Yes, obviously petrified footprints are common in the geologic record, but the likelihood of such vast masses of footprints from various different creatures being preserved on the same plains throughout the geologic record under normal circumstances is vanishingly small, and the fact we have a few examples of footprints preserved at certain points in history, such as your modern example shown in the beginning (many of which are not covered and preserved in new strata but are being eroded away and some quickly so depending on circumstances), does not really help the case you're trying to present here. Might as well point out that any creationist not having an answer to something you bring up does not mean they can't come up with a reasonable answer eventually, and they obviously does not have the same dedication to expanding the research on the subject as secular evolutionists have, so it becomes even more important for future generations who are faithful to the Word of God to expand the field and find more answers that help demonstrate how God's Word is completely accurate and reliable in contrast to the secular man's opinions. That problem aside, you also have to assume that it's true there's been millions of years of suspicious mass preservation of countless tracks sharing the same vast plains, rather than just extremely few and isolated examples, and that they've been conveniently enough buried in distinct successive strata before being eroded away. Arguably, the presence of billions of footprints throughout the geologic record is far better explained by a global flood event depositing successive layers of strata where surviving creatures walk upon it and leaving tracks that are subsequently preserved by incoming sediment waves, producing distinct pankake layers of strata without any normal topography or reworking as would be expected on the secular timescale. Also of note is how you admit these involve circumstances of rapid preservation, and creationists don't negate the fact that lesser numbers of tracks have been preserved since the global flood in other events where their quick preservation has been favored. None of the things you're pointing out here are new to creationists. On the point of the groups leaving the Ark, determining which taxa actually belong to distinct created kinds is a challenging field, just like for evolutionists in determining which taxa shares which lines of common descent. Also worth of note is that the global flood probably didn't just deposit whole erathems at one time, but it deposited different layers within those larger layers in phases as the tectonic activity moves the continents and the floodwaters are gradually going back and forth depositing these layers as the water level advances, which of course also would have involved a lot of heat and pressure, preserving the tracks. This seems much harder to explain with the secular evolutionist position and you would hardly expect so many preserved fossilized tracks in such distinct layers that were curiously enough never eroded or reworked to the degree we observe in the present but instead piled on top of one another to produce a massive wall of distinct thick sediment layers, all which curiously enough are admitted as having been produced by water and containing a majority of marine fossils. Regarding your last note on humans living on top of the eroded layers, surely you could imagine catastrophic events that mass erodes sedimentary layers, both during and after the global flood, and assuming these Miocene layers were deposited late in the event, the subsequent uplift of the continents would obviously cause mass erosion to occur from the receding waters, exposing the tracks and fossils. Saying "flood geology is a failure" seems a far too premature conclusion and arguably not one that is actually justifiable, and by this same reasoning you may as well state that secular geology is a failure.

Hate to break it to you atheists but the Bible says nothing about the earth being 6,000 years old. One guy did some math based on assumptions of when people lived.

I live in Wheatland WY and I believe I've found evidence of those creators just outside of town. I am sure it's a teketite and the biggest one I've ever seen in person but the thing is it's only a chip of the Rock it came from

At 39:00, you mentioned "turbidites", but I don't think that was the correct term. If there is disruption of bedding in sediments due to biological action, the process would be "bioturbation". Turbidites are more specifically deposits due to turbidity flows, usually associated with flows off continental shelves, or similar environments.

It sounds to me like every generation must birth a new species. Also, what about travel time? Some animals don't travel fast, or even much at all.

I love ancient lakes

Seriously loving this series. Keep em coming

I look forward to testing the ai lol

Hmm...deja vu I was wondering what happe

Thanks for your consideration! I’ll take your critique seriously and work up some responses. One of the core ideas is that reality is a based on a type of procedural generation that we discover as we mature in not only scientific understanding, but technological advancements and perspectives, as well, to incorporate a more holistic view.

Snelling salts... good for waking up feinted people

The word you're looking for at 26:52 is 'childish'

Plan for a million. Get a hundred thousand. ''SUCCESS!'

Everything he does is misleading. The son of lies.

Here is another YEC perspective for Dead Sea geology : ua-cam.com/video/ogjotOOdBfc/v-deo.htmlsi=eZAqcnH95HEO4IwH

Why can’t they use carbon data on the hammer to get answers

@drjoelduff I'm very interested in the Wyoming trap cave you mentioned in this video. If you have the name of the location please share as I want to dig into that. Thanks for your excellent work!

Hey Dr. Duff apologies if you have already answered this: Are you a theistic evolutionist or something else? And do you think Old Earth Creationism has any merit?

It would be interesting to see the AiG model. Would it force them to go through all the contradictory articles and weed them out?

I knew exactly where you were going with that AiG Flood image. I saw it years ago it was the first thing that came to mind. It should have been a brown slop that would have suffocated the whales.🙃

I can. A herd of pissed off masterdon chased em in one direction and we chased em en the other so when they saw the tar pit the must have thought. "Fuck it we'll just get it over with quick and easy" and all just jumped in the pit.

I have watched all your videos. Certainly You have given me something's to take into serious consideration. Overall, however, you have not changed my mind concerning a Young Earth and the Genesis Narrative.

From what I understand, Dire Wolves are not wolves in the true sense. They are a seperate species from wolves.

Um.... on the west side there is an actual cliff before you reach Avdat and the Judean Plain. In this rift valley is a field of small cinder cones. So, there's also vulcanism going on in the valley. North(on the Sea of Galilee, aka Kinneret), at Capernaum, many of the buildings were made of the local basaltic rock as opposed to the limestone more commonly used in the area of Judaea.

Please update on us periodically on Doctor Kent Hovind too. 👍🏼

For comparison on daily attendance, the average at Disneyland is currently 47,000

Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

I hate this human is hard to define stuff. We are as easy to describe as any other species and our lineage is no more or less complicated to describe then any other lineage. When did humans become humans is as fuzzy a question as when did seals become seals or when did french stop being latin. There is no hard line and it can only be approximated in retrospect.

41:04 They’re going to ask a NOAA character about the flood? Awesome! Maybe they’ll learn something! 😜

Noah. why did you become drunk during the flood? was it because you were emotionally overwhelmed by the horror of what god had done? Noah, Why was Ham's son punished for his father inadvertently seeing you need and him immediately acting to cover you up? Noah, How could animals adapted to the same ecological niche exist side by side in the same region and at the same time (such as Tyrannosaurids, Terror Birds, saber tooth cats, cheetahs and cougars in the American SW?

Calvin. I think the word you're searching for is "condescending".

The distinction between Human and Primate, used to be the ability to use tools. Then they found that some of the other primates (chimps, etcetera) use rudimentary tools as well.