Відео

Listening to this brill video for a second time - really is quality! And scrolling through the comments - which are FIRE! some wonderful stuff below. Our game keeps raising!

Hi Ducking Stool and take a look at this one! I have posted this on various channels and it shows why retrials should happen within 1-2 years after the conviction A huge development on another case which shows our justice system needs a complete overhaul. From the BBC article today. "Wrong man is in prison, says murder victim family" This is unbelievable! The family of the victim wants the convicted man out of prison. This is what the family of the victim said: "This conviction is an insult to reason and fairness, and every day the Criminal Cases Review Commission delays action deepens this failure." Jason Moore convicted for murdering Robert Darby in east London, in 2013

This woman’s persona really irritates me so much! She thinks she can get clicks from this, even though she knows absolutely nothing about this case! Assuming innocence is outrageous to her yet in law in the UK, you must start by assuming innocence?? She appears to do the complete opposite! Uses zero evidence to push her ridiculous claims! Then rubbishes world renowned neonatologists! Whist possessing O neonatal knowledge herself. 3 pathologists gave autopsy results of natural causes on 6 of the 7 babies.

The fact that facially, she looks like a cross between the Joker in drag, and the horror-clown from the "Saw" franchise is enough for me to stop listening to her '@1:27. I do appreciate it is unsafe ( as well as not big, not clever, and not NICEl[!] )to judge by appearances but - with the most morally grotesque - their inner ugliness of character often acquires outward representation... Winston Churchill (actually the biggest warmonger and the biggest war-criminal of the second world war [up to half a million civilians melted, burned or simply suffocated across Valentine's day 1945 in Dresden, for a start!]) is, perhaps the most obvious example of the phenomenon I describe... I value tolerance and strive to cultivate it but with everything we now know (Insulin case; Baby C; Brearey's Baby O; and Jayaram 15th May 2017 meeting where he appears to have added further fabrications to his previously sent-outside-of-chain-of-command email to the police in order to persuade them against their better judgement and that of CoCh chief Exec Tony Chambers to launch a criminal investigation), ANY remotely educated person who now professes to believe the prosecution case is self-selecting as a study in abnormal psychology, exploiting the serial killer myth for profit (Moritz) or other self-promotion (this grotesque individual). It is now equivalent to being a 'flat-earther'. Time is the most precious thing in life: I will waste any more of mine entertaining the rank absence shame or any semblance of personal integrity in people like this refugee from a horror film. The most depressing thing is that when I went to share these sentiments with her on her own video, SHE HAS ABOUT ALMOST 1500 COMMENTS! As someone once observed: "No one ever went broke underestimating the public's capacity for bad taste!".

susan oliver is a fake person

Back to the Lie-nce. Just look at her. Look at how she is

If that's a scientist, something about her reminds me of the witch out of 'Paulus the Little Gnome'. Funny that should come back to me after all these years😂See how her lips are turned down the whole time, even when she's smiling. She's not averse to joining in with witch hunts herself.

Excellent video. Thanks. I believe that LL is innocent! This Susan is completely nonsense and she just looking for likes in the media. Also her voice is extremely annoying 😅

I love your videos. You are a natural conversationalist so hope you keep making more.

Good stuff 👊

Well done! Your videos are excellent. Not just because I feel Lucy is innocent too- I just feel the way you dismantle stuff like this is really good. I was an anaesthetist for 37 years, a consultant for thirty, and I regularly anaesthetised children and was an Advanced Paediatric Life Support Instructor for about 15 years, but I’d never dream of making a video and claim to be some kind of ‘expert’ in neonatology and saying stuff like this. It doesn’t matter any more what she thinks-to me- the truth is coming out now. Thanks to David Davis in Parliament, Mark McDonald’s press conference, The New Yorker article, Private Eye articles and videos from you, Mark Mayes, Accordinfg to Carl in the UK and others. Thank you.

So after I left this comment on her channel, most of what I comment is disappearing. As I said above, I could be wrong and there is an innocent explanation (edit innocent explanation here If I filter by NEW then scroll ALL the way down to a comment I made, I can then see the all the sub-tree of comments. If I only filter by TOP, then it filters out replies (probably those with fewer likes/reactions. It's a YT glitch probs): "The hospital is a source of many factors that may have impacted the health of those babies. I will discuss one here that the doctor in the video stated firmly was not an issue during the period covering the deaths. When I was hand hygiene champion on a ward (this is not an appeal to authority, just an explanation of my past experience) we were educated on the outsized impact of hand hygiene on nosocomial infections and subsequently on patients. The COC Hospital had a sewage problem in their sinks. The comprehensive "Hand Hygiene : A Handbook for Medical Professionals" by Didier Pittet, John M. Boyce, and Benedetta Allegranzi states that "HAI incidence is much higher in severely ill patients. In high-income countries, approximately 30% of ICU patients are affected by at least one episode of HAI with substantial associated morbidity and mortality" An HAI is a Healthcare Associated Infection. On average, 7-10% of hospital patients worldwide will get an infection they didn't have beforehand. Chapter 5 is a very cool exploration of mathematical modelling of the transmission of pathogens and the difficulties associated with mitigating them, whether through handwashing or other means. They contend that it can take years for an observable improvement in hospitals. Especially multi-resistant pathogens like P.Aeruginosa. Years. The drill down into this very issue in the journal Hygiene by Ficheux et al is also illuminating "Successful Disinfection of a New Healthcare Facility Contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa" Their conclusion? "In conclusion, P. aeruginosa contamination of newly constructed health facilities is very difficult to resolve." Other factors could well include poor training, lack of ward rounds, medication errors (of which my facilitator once told me there were 5000 documented medication errors a week in Australia) amongst other issues. So, wielding Occam's Razor, could infections be a more plausible explanation for the criticality rather than a female serial killer who had, as far as I'm aware, exhibited no behaviours consistent with an ASPD or psychopathy diagnosis (as Kent Kiehl or Bob Hare might categorise them in the literature). I have no idea whether a PCL interview/assessment was ever conducted with Letby. My training and reasoning says on balance of probabilities, especially absent any witness to an actual murderous act, that the hospital environment as a systemic whole is a much likelier explanation. Kind of like "Was it Boeing or the pilots?" Which is why I initially said "the hospital was present at every death".

I have a sneaking suspicion that comments I have left on the good Dr Oliver's channel have been deleted-especially if they mention pseudomonas or the likelihood of it to being a causative factor (a la Occam's Razor) of sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis and pneumonia which were given as causative factors in 3 deaths at the hospital. However, being a fan of the scientific method I have a reasonable doubt of my suspicions. (Do you see what I did there?) I am not a supporter of Lucy Letby-just a person (and a nurse) who tries my best to think logically and realistically-and I can see reasonable doubt where the jury did not.

Thanks so much, The Ducking Stool. Your videos are brilliant. I love your commentary - it's spot on. And I really value the wider references you give and comparisons you make. And so much significant analysis, and details!

Well said, Ducking Stool, that woman is most annoying. Glad you confronted her nonsensical drawl.

This is a brilliant video and you speak so well. Like you say, Dr Susan Oliver's phd is in nanoscience - she's not a neonatologist!

Her strategy is clear - she wants to create controversy so that she gets enough views to start being relevant to this case. I personally have chosen to stay away from her videos. She deletes comments and doesn't play fair. She is totally irrelevant to the case. Her credentials doesn't matter if she is trying to assert her authority on a subject she knows little of. Her opinions on this case have no weight.

The way at the beginning of her vids she points out that Cindy is a dog must be very helpful to some of her followers. Can't wait for Lucy to be exonerated just to piss her off. Another great video. Cheers.

The absurdity of the claims made by some of the followers of the channel is beyond belief. The 6 autopsies revealed natural causes of death and they can't handle it so they refer to the Marnerides report as if it's fsct. The opinion of one expert cannot overrule the findings of the 6 autopsies. In fact it's a scandal the autopsies have been disregarded. A medical scandal.

I saw this and though who is this mad woman! Who claims to be a scientist! So pleased you picked up on this.

There's nothing scientific about any of her assertions. She seems like a fraud to me ... although I only have a BSc.

Marnerides? 'claimed' Baby O's liver damage was equivalent to a 'car crash' victim. Contributing to the fantasy narrative that LL must have either 'punched or kicked' the baby's liver. This is absolutely mental, just like Susan.

Dr Olivier, who was born in UK, is an excellent example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. She is so stupid that she does not have sufficient common sense to realise that she is stupid and therefore takes her stupidity for cleverness. Remembering that stupidity is not an intellectual failing but a moral and ethical shortcoming.

Another gem I was able to dig outta thirwall and another reason for their concerns consultants to be scared of baby o and P parents…..prior to birth mom concerned about delivering triplets at COCH….they talked her into it, telling her that each baby would get 1 to 1 nursing care….that never happened The father was really upset afterwards….made a lot of inquires…..why was there a lack of communication surrounding the investigation and bereavement support to them…very angry there was a root cause analyse done on 1 of the babies death and they were never to,d, grandma found out about it after seeing it on the news, in a letter to the medical director stated …. At no point had anyone contacted us to inform us this investigation into our son’s death…..felt that the trust did not respect our grief enough to go to every possible length to inform us about this investigation and this added to the distress of our family….they demanded a meeting with the medical director….unfortunately the medical director was on leave and do meeting had to be postponed…..meeting cancelled eventually because someone had gone to the police and do couldn’t comment… Apparently once the matter was referred to the police, the trust had no further contact with the families, from then on only the police had contacts with family 😢😢😢😢😢

When you mention to the followers of that channel and to her that there is no evidence LL ia guilty, no CCTV, no witnesses, no motive, no forensic evidence and on the top of this the 6 autopsies performed did show natural causes for the deaths, then they get crazy resorting to ad hominem attacks, insults, and try to argue all the pathologists and Dr Taylor or Dr Dimitrova and Dr Aitor who have found no foul play in two of the babies deaths, are cranks. They have really lost it. It's one of the few channels that supports the main narrative. The other one is CS2C

Hello everyone! You are invited to see my comments on that channvel that have caused a lot of reactions by her followers but received a lot of likes from many others. She has made a false equivalency between those who think LL is innocent and antivaxxers. Her arguments are based on ad hominem attacks and much of it are strawman arguments. She also claims that people are LL 'supporters' bht that's not true because it could have been anyone in her case who was accused and then convicted in the absence of evidence. There is no evidence that LL is guilty.

Thru Thirwall, able to see the actual notes from baby Os crash and who was there….fyi the crash call Dr for that day was Dr B, she didn’t arrive for 40 minutes…..Dr brearey and Dr Gibbs also there along with “ middle aged, dweeb looking boyfriend Dr”…….i was also able to see who did what……Dweeb doctor was maintaining airway and couldn’t have done anything that could have harmed the liver…….br b was very upset after the autopsy report was released, it stated the chest compressions could have caused liver bleed, she didn’t arrive the compressions, we know why Dr brearey is concerned, Dr Gibbs was there and he has a history of problem IV insertions ( see baby G, took 7 sticks for him)…..maybe he out the UVC catheter in wrong ? Lucy did do a Datix report that they lost iv access during recess…..funny the dweeb Dr got a really spiffy job as a consultant right after this baby ……..hmm wonder why ? Wonder who played a part in getting him that job? Oh wait it just a coincidence, nothing to see here

Nurse here, I get the medical stuff….and have found some great things on thirlwall….found out who was doing what during baby Os demise….dr A ( so called boyfriend Dr ) did airway management, Dr B ( annoymous doctor at trial who was suspected in 2014 at the demise of baby Noah) was doing chest compressions….. well we know what Dr brearey was doing , Dr Gibbs also was there…..hmmm wonder if he was trying to put a umbilical line catheter in….but catheter could have already been in right after birth…. However, Lucy did an incident report on baby O after the demise stating they lost IV access……hmmmmmm…Dr Gibbs has a history of not being able to get IV lines in……see baby G…..with UVC lines, there is a risk of entering the liver blood vessels After the preliminary autopsy result came back…..Dr B ( who by the way, was the designated crash call consultant that day and did not show up for 40 minutes)…..had a some sort of anxiety attack that the autopsy had said that the bleeding could have been caused by chest compressions……it also said the UVC catheter could have contributed to it…well we now know that Brearey stuck a baby on the wrong side of its abdomen Gee the only guy who is not implicated on the autopsy is the “ boyfriend “ doctor…..hmmmmmmm soon after this event he went on to a spiffy consultant job at another hospital….I am sure it’s just coincidental….dont want to point fingers…solely my opinion as a nurse……Oh and by the way, noticed baby O got a powerful resuscitation drug called dopamine that’s used when your bp plumishes……noticed a certain time they had to massively increase the dose…did it coincide with a needle ?….naw, again, just coincidence…nothing to see here

I think it pays more to be on the prosecution side!.... I wonder what she thinks of the other 50 global experts....?

I found out thru some digging at various thirlwall releases, the ID of Dr A….can tell u by his pic that Lucy was not screwing him…can easily see how he was pursuing him……his linked in account has a link to dewy Evans….dont worry the 2 biggest pro Lucy sites on twitter are following him cause I bet they know who he is…..I figured it out in 30 minutes just via thirwall…..oh and FYI…see was a witness to baby Os demise, so my hunch is in exchange for keeping quiet and using Lucy to spy for the consultants….he within a short period of time got this prestigious gig at another hospital….of course this is speculation on my part, not pointing fingers….

One of Mathew Hopkins witch prickers ! Such a cocky little madam !

Love the Magdalen Berns vibe, please keep it up….oh what I wouldn’t give to have had her opinion on the Lucy stuff…..question though, explain the pic u use with the duck faced man….i know what a ducking stool is and what it was used for…..just wondered if this illustration has another meaning …..clueless American here

Susan just loves to be contraversial and plain nasty. I can't bear to see/listen to her. Her sycophantic followers are certainly glued to her every word which is a worry.

Thank you lovely x Shared on my Twitter account.

"I am a PhD Scientist (and a silly cow). I think that you sheep should stay in the sheep pen,take your vaccines, drink your fluoridated water and let us clever people stitch up Lucy Letby for our own nefarious purposes.

I have a PhD in a pure STEM subject. My career though has been as a healthcare scientist mainly in medical research. That’s far more helpful to understanding the Letby case than the PhD. Her PhD in itself means very little for all the reasons you give and the way she tries to cash in on it really rather pathetic

Glad you zoomed in . The original suggested video came up on my feed. It makes me so frustrated when UA-cam channels like that come up total misinformation and biased on her guilt. The bigger channels have near a million views and I suspect most of the viewers believe what they are told in their content. I know from experience how health care professionals throw less qualified employees under the bus Seen it first hand. These Dr's are rotten in my opinion. And how on earth have her colleagues she got on well with have been gagged . Not one person she worked with went on oath to defend her. That makes me wonder who has prevented that

I cant listen to this idiot woman, Dr Richard Taylor is not just a lone maverick because countless other neonatologists and medical experts agree with him. It is not Taylor's opinion it is actually what is written in the medical notes.

Susan Oliver claimed that the evidence Richard Taylor (top neonatologist) was in her words "BS". So a Scientist versus a Specialist Neonatologist--- mmmmm I think I know which one I believe!!! This irritating Aussie talks rubbish and uses a sleeping dog as a gimmick!!!! mmmmm- how desperate. Thanks to the Ducking Stool for another great summary. FREE LUCY LETBY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mystic Meg should get some help, just can't take her seriously at all.

Thanks for this. You're right, there's no science in her video, it's mostly ad hominem and provocation: she's especially going after Lucy Letby supporters. You see her followers calling it "Dr Richard Taylor's report" and then attacking him for not seeing the medical records etc. She will jump on anything pro-innocence posters get wrong (of which there are some things, let's admit that) but is happy to let pro-guilters revel in misinformation. It seems pointless engaging in comments on her channel. She's also a big fan of your other favourite channel!

1) Anyone who can Cheshire Cat grin their way through a talk on such a serious and emotive subject is not on the side of compassion, reason or truth. 2) A propos, that’s why the Sciences need the Humanities - people with or without PhDs who have been raised and educated to understand and critically assess ethics - justice, discourse - subsets of Philosophy and Theology. There are plenty of Scientists’ names in the ranks of genociders - Assad is an medical specialist, for example! Since when did Science alone result in ethical outcomes in human history? This woman is a good example of why we cannot allow people to monopolise the public perception of truth on the basis that Science trumps all other disciplines. 3) As you correctly point out, the Science actually does point to Lucy’s innocence. So much for a PhD in Science anyway!

Thanks a lot for your videos which I appreciate very much. A lot of common sense and calm in your approach. By contrast, this Dr-PhD-scientist lady is an abomination to watch (thanks for cutting the gesticulating, where are the strings?) and to listen to, both for the ears and the intellect.

An Australian accent would go down well in a Kangaroo Court.

Shamelessly dishonest, and shamelessly devoid of critical thinking.

My Brother and his wife have PhDs coming out the wazoo. Neither have any common sense, and have zero critical thinking. Their abject stupidity offends me.

Letby is guilty as sin and y0ou're as nuts as she is if you believe otherwise.

I totally share your opinion. It's a strange situation that two of the doctors who gave evidence against Lucy, have now been accused of causing the deaths of two of the babies. Surely, this should set alarm bells ringing, I am not saying they caused the deaths intentionally, but if this is true? The two witnesses gained from Lucy's conviction.

I'm a retired nurse. if you complain against doctor's you must have a lot of faith in your abilities as you know they're going be gunning for you. The soul of the NHS has gone I don't even know why it has the same name. Blair sold the name. When i trained you had more or less free accommodation, good canteens and although you were paid little you 'felt'. looked after and you believed in what you were doing. All that's gone.

Your channel is excellent thank you, making key points very effectively about the inadequate care in the hospital and the sickening scapegoating of Lucy Letby