Відео

This is most likely down to the “sweet spot” of the specific headset. The latest models are supposed to be much better. Essentially the lens will have an area of real sharp clarity and it falls off the further away from it you look. If you are looking at a gauge it is most likely going to be in that sweet spot but looking outside at something far away/to the side it will be out of that centered spot. I’m not familiar with the Oculus but might be worth googling about the sweet spot of that model. It could also be the graphics settings in MSFS so try cranking up detail and textures. The 3060 is a good car but it can only do so much.

Thanks captain grammar.

If you lean out the engine too much you are cutting off the fuel supply and it will shut down the engine.

@@sprocketsimulations thanks for answering! Before this "fuel cut" that's happening, the fuel flow doesn't decrease and the EGT doesn't increase as it's supposed to be... I'm confused about that

@LucasRamos-ho2zj do you have auto mixture turned on? Does it do the same in other aircraft? Check your keybinds to make sure that they are set correctly. The levers should move incrementally from the top to the bottom. Try it in something like the 172 to see if it acts the same way. If it does you know it’s something in your settings and not the aircraft.

Thank you dude that was exactly what was going on here. I turned the sim auto mixture off and now it's all working properly. ​@@sprocketsimulations

I haven’t used mine in a while but I remember that making this video was a pain for that reason. Essentially I had to make OBS recognize each lens as a separate monitor and then select the left eye as what was being recorded. Microsoft’s mixed reality and OpenXR are not really being supported anymore so moving forward the G2 will be sort of left behind. There is probably some way to use steamVR but imagine there will be some very wacky ways to make it happen. To answer your question there is no easy way to make it mirror like other VR titles do. If you are looking to record use OBS and look up some instructions on how to make it a display.

I haven’t flown that particular aircraft but usually you hit FLC once you are trimmed for your climb and it will select the speed you are going. Some aircraft also have a pitch hold button on the yoke to hold your climb while you get it configured. Or just set it on the ground. The up/down buttons are the way to select the desired speed.

No addons, 34” ultra wide asus monitor 3440x1440. 6800xt GPU. Going to a amd 5800x3d CPU probably gave me the biggest performance gain as it is perfect for games as they don’t use all cores. It was faster than a 5950x. I always skip a generation with PC stuff. I never buy the current gen, especially on GPUs.

Tutorials like these are easy af, don’t be mad at yourself cuz your not bad, it takes pilots year how to learn these things

I would say no it’s not. The only closeness part is that your head is moving and you have a slightly improved depth perception. Someone else asked this on here. Main issues with VR that actually take away from a pilots seat comparison is that you are not seeing the same controls you are feeling. Plus if you need to look at other items, write down atis info/atc instructions, or look at a POH you are not able to do so in any realistic manner. Visually it gives you a slight edge just as any VR title does. But I find that TrackIR with an iPad for maps and digital data as well as a pen and paper provides a much more accurate representation of real life flying. It is still nowhere near close but as far as work flow, and what you are able to look at outside of the headset is much more accurate. If you invested the same amount as a headset into more peripherals then it will be come even more realistic as you will have physical dials and buttons to push. Such as a nav/com stack, auto pilot controls and others will minimize mouse use which is by far the most unrealistic way to control the aircraft. I used VR for about 300 hours and it’s just not practical for anything more than short sight seeing flights. It’s great for that. But again, this is just the visuals. Nothing about actually flying.

@@sprocketsimulations Saves on countless lessons and 1500 hours of flying time.

@@sprocketsimulations I've never heard anyone else with real flight hours say that it's only a slight edge. It's the same with racing sims, every single person I've seen mention anything about it says their time improvements were either negligible while still having better spatial awareness, or like the vast majority who immediately see improvements in their lap times. Same with pilots being able to better orient for landings etc.

That’s an awesome and expensive setup! Nice! 👍

I would say it is an experience but there are definitely trade offs. I have found I don’t really use VR much anymore. I use my TrackIR much more and able to use my iPad with Navigraph and take a drink when I want. It also performs better. But the experience is very cool to try. If the headsets/pc’s and software were more compatible and advanced it would be better. End of the day, for me, it’s just not practical enough and too many trade offs need to be made. I have probably 300+ hours in VR but the wow factor wore off.

No your planning will be even more important as you would most likely be predicting what the active runway is going to be before you even take off. They would probably give you vectors but it would be to a point on the approach to cut it shorter and help them maintain traffic. So again the planning is important because you would just hit the direct to button to the way point that they tell you. If they give you RNAV vs ILS they are very similar and it takes really on two clicks and a spin of the knob to swap it. You can usually find this out ahead of time as well by listening to their ATIS. The more you have in the garmin the faster and easier your approach is going to be and let you stay focused. Truth is that you wouldn’t be flying this entire approach in something like this slow Cessna. Depending on airspace and weather you would either have clearance from a controller who has already given you directions and altitudes or if it is uncontrolled and good weather you would just contact the tower when you are maybe 10 miles out and they would just tell you to join at a certain leg such as downwind or base. If the weather is bad you might have to follow this entire approach and if it is a busy airport. If there are airliners lining up to go in and out the controllers are using SIDs and STARS as well as approaches for multiple runways. Flying a little plane like this into there is going to be a nightmare. For everyone.

Strange, this is well known to be one of the better aircraft out there. I also an entirely Logitech setup and have zero issues with the functionality. My best suggestion is to remove everything from your community folder, just to a temp directory, and leave only what is installed by this. Double check your keybinds to make sure they are correct and not using 3rd party software as it is not needed. Basically, dial it all back to have only this aircraft and basic Logitech controls. See if it works, if it does then you know something else you have is causing a conflict. It’s definitely not from the developers side of this aircraft as it does work very very well. I’m sure something on your system/sim is messing with it. I can assure you it does work and is a great aircraft. Make sure to follow the manual very strictly as it is a very realistic model with accurate procedures, failures, and issues. Good luck.