Відео

I have a Sigma 12-24mm f4.5-5.6 DG HSM that I originally used on my F5 when I wanted full frame shots. At that time my Digital was a D300 which was a 12mp DX format camera. BTW the D300 actually made some very nice images. Still have 12-24 and still use it on occasion. One nice thing about the first edition version was that it's distortion was below 1% and that rectilinear bias in the design did result in a loss in sharpness at the corners but I never found it to be too bad. One lens that sparks my interest is the LAOWI 9mm lens. If find the thought of a lens wide enough where my foot wear could become prominent in an image rather fascination. BTW, the solution for this is to view the lens as a One Shot Panorama lens and do the necessary cropping for feet and such in post. Makes it much easier than doing 5 or 6 focus stacks and then merging them into a fully focused panorama.

great video!

Hey! Recently I started getting into film photography, did you have any experience with film? if so, would like to see a video on your opinion about film photography in the nowadays photography scenes. :)

Nikon P1000 is 3000mm... pretty zoomy😂

I have many Helios lenses. My favorite is not the one with swirly bokeh, but the 44-6 (I think?) that has lens coating but still catches a lot of circular flaring when illuminated from corners. I love taking photos in the evenings with this lens, result is beautifully warm images with rainbow-shaped flares. I know pixel peepers will tell me the lens is flawed and not sharp enough and blah blah blah, but the result is all that matters to me. And modern lenses with surgically controlled specs won't give me the result that is so pleasing to look at.

Cool!

youtube randomly put this video in my feed... It worked, good fun and a new subscriber for you, thank you good sir!

Not sure of the full back story but in the late 60's and early 70's, Vivitar (Ponder and Best) made a 135mm f/1.5 lens. It had a T-mount configuration so you could use it with just about any brand of 35mm camera. Weighed in at just under 2170g (4.7lbs) with tripod collar and metal lens hood! Camera-Wiki has a posting about it under "Vivitar Professional 135mm f/1.5."

🔥

Great video man love your editing style and the on screen text when showing the specs for the lenses is a nice touch keep it up!

Love the content! Highly recommend watching barry lyndon I think its free on yt. Also a proud owner of a helios 44. I love the "Made in USSR" stamp on the side and is not only dead sharp but a good talking piece!

Would have loved to see the Zeiss (Contax) N-Mirotar 210mm f/0.03 (technically, it's T/0.03) covered. I remember seeing an eBay listing for this way back in the early 2000s and that was crazy. Unfortunately, it's only for B&W photography on film due to how it works (using light amplification technology for night vision devices). This was obviously meant for the Cold War era spy craft though consumers could still order one as they did market it for filming wildlife at night.

At 9:30 you mention the fast 2.8 lenses. When I was your age nothing 1.8 or slower was "fast!" Kids today! :D

Just to deslaughterise the pronunciation - Zeiss is pronounced with a "ts", rather than Z.

I have one of the Lytro light field cameras, the software is the key :/

Wait… the guy who everyone thought faked the moon landing is the only other buyer of the lenses sold to nasa for the moon expedition?!?!

There’s a $2 million 1600mm Leica lens that the owner had to custom mount to a vehicle.

DJI owns Hasselblad.

There is a 300mm 2.0 for finish photos at running like horse and dog races.

Great video! Great editing! But please... use international formats aka the metric system ;P

The Canon 5200mm lens was like lowkey designed for the military. Could be mounted on ships, spy planes and coastal observation stations. After all Japan was also affected by the cold war and had the threat of soviet territory next door, despite their "neutral" stance.

My guy. It was for spying.

Incredible video! your grade and editing are all top notch and the humour was great, too. Subscribed!

Long exposure time would fix the issue of moving stuff, but does pretty much require a tripod

Your voice sounds like Jason Vong, wow.

Could you talk about bridge camera crazy lenses in the next video? Loved this one!

nice job on editing this

You may mention LSST lens - YT: 2vIKtR7nGtg Optics in short: www.lsst.org/sites/default/files/docs/Claver_086.18.pdf Optics description: www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/900049

The story about Kubrik is so interesting!!!

Th worst I personally used was a Kodak disk film camera. A point and shoot from the 80s. It auto advanced the film (a disk) when you clicked the shutter. It was all automatic but it mean't that the photo was a fraction of a second delayed. Forgot taking candid photo of a cat with it. The cat would her the mechanism advancing and be able to turn its head before photo was snapped. Many a good photo got lost with a distorted cat face as it rapidly looked at the camera.

Are you yonger brother of potatojet

Well it’s funny as you can just get a mount and attract your camera to a telescope and get a cheap 1400mm lens. Wonder you can see the Hubble with a 3000mm telescope

OW-DUH DELFT

It's been some time, but I thought I read that the Canon Cannon was commissioned by NASA to photograph rocket launches in an effort to capture detailed frames of the vehicles under stress. I could be re-writing history, though...

Here are a few telephotos to look at. The Zeiss 1700 f4, the Leica 1600 f5.6, nikon 300 f2.0, nikon 1200-1700 f5.6-8, nikon 2000 f11.

Hmmm. Maybe the client doesn't see a difference. But believe me, me editing 800 wedding images benefit a lot from using a GM lense. It is the coating what makes a difference. But, and this might be the handshake, I don't buy them. I rent them. In my personal Kit there is only one GM prime (the 35).

For a moment if I'm not wrong only the NSA has crazy lenses who ever made 😂😂😂 And cover longest ever range 😂😂😂

2 stops brighter means 200% brighter, not 400% (that would be 3 stops). Other than that, it's a fun video. 😊

the last lense (Canon 5200 f14) can be achieved by combining a 600mm f1.6 with two 3x extenders ... roughly. I got the two 3x extenders for EF, who would lend me a 600mm f1.6? ^^

Can you don the GH1 and GH2 Panasonic mirrorless camera. The GH 7 is $4,000. But retro look by you on what can now be done with old technology and new software. How can smart new software make old new abd great. Go for it.

Couldn't spent 50-100 dollars on ebay to show it on the video.

i would like to see how the photos with these lenses are

the lens used in "come & see" !! Look the movie if you don't know what I'm talking about ;)

8:05 😂😂

btw there are light L16s sold on amazon for $120 USD sealed in box

In the Barry Lindon movie, candle light scene, everyone had to stay in the razer thin focal plane. The actors were carefully placed. I was fascinated enough to purchase the movie on DVD.

О, мой бог. Не ожидал увидеть Гелиос. Я фотографировал на него. Массовость - главное достоинство, возможно единственное.

check out the DIY Perks custom built lens, it's a FF equivalent to 35mm F 0.4 ua-cam.com/video/9cT0jXI7l4E/v-deo.html

Great video! There are some crazy lenses out there 😂

Check diy perks lens