Debunking the BBC debunk of ivermectin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 жов 2021
- Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug
www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-581...
BBC Reality Check
But the BBC can reveal there are serious errors in a number of key studies that the drug's promoters rely on.
but thousands of supporters, many of them anti-vaccine activists, have continued to vigorously campaign for its use.
Members of social media groups swap tips on getting hold of the drug, even advocating the versions used for animals
www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
Large pro-ivermectin Facebook groups have turned into forums for people to find advice on where to buy it, including preparations meant for animals.
The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the drug for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud.
The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on ivermectin and Covid
Social media group
/ 1408651561228668931
cosmosmagazine.com/health/cov...
That’s how they all met on Twitter
They've been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.
Reference please
The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the drug for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud.
None of the rest show convincing evidence of ivermectin's effectiveness.
Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that ivermectin prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".
Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked
On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back.
The independent scientists have flagged this as a possible indicator of fraud.
The sample of research papers examined by the independent group also contains some high-quality studies from around the world.
A recent study in Lebanon was found to have blocks of details of 11 patients that had been copied and pasted repeatedly
they have submitted a retraction to the scientific journal which published it
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34073...
Study from Iran
Another study from Iran seemed to show that ivermectin prevented people dying from Covid.
www.researchsquare.com/articl...
The records of how much iron was in patients' blood contained numbers in a sequence that was unlikely to come up naturally.
Dr Morteza Niaee, who led the Iran study, defended the results and the methodology and disagreed with problems pointed out to him,
adding that it was "very normal to see such randomisation" when lots of different factors were considered
Ivermectin is generally considered a safe drug, though there have been some reports of side effects.
But indirect harm can come from giving people a false sense of security, especially if they choose ivermectin instead of seeking hospital treatment for Covid, or getting vaccinated in the first place.
Some groups regularly contain posts about conspiracy theories of ivermectin cover-ups, as well as pushing anti-vaccine sentiment or encouraging patients to leave hospital if they aren't getting the drug.
South African nurse dies
Instead of consulting a doctor, she continued with the ivermectin and got home oxygen.
What study are the BBC talking about?
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34552...
www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
www.medicalbrief.co.za/iverme...
We recommend that meta-analysts who study interventions for COVID-19 should request and personally review IPD (independent patient data) in all cases,
In a similar vein, all clinical trials published on COVID-19 should immediately follow best-practice guidelines and upload anonymised IPD so that this type of analysis can occur.
ivmmeta.com
jja-contents.wdc-jp.com/pdf/JJ...
Kitasato University, based on the judgment that it is necessary to examine the clinical effect of ivermectin to prevent the spread of uncertain COVID-19,
asked Merck & Co., Inc. to conduct clinical trials of ivermectin for COVID-19 in Japan.
This company has priority to submit an application for an expansion of ivermectin’s indications, since the original approval for the manufacture and sale of ivermectin was conferred to it.
However, the company said that it had no intention of conducting clinical trials.
As someone in the medical field myself, it's truly baffling how journalists these days speak with such certainty about things they know so little about.
Blackhoof mushroom is untalked about in this, and its mentioned and proven to work in many Library of Medicine studies... please pass on this info (it grows on many trees worldwide and has very good immunoeffects)
Don't they just regurgitate what their told by an MP or other twit?
They are actors reading the script handed to them
'These days'? Any IT professional in the last 30 years would know their Baffling lack of research and knowledge level in the field of computing. The fact that they had/have Rory Clelan Jones as head of tech reporting, who's only role seems to have been confidently mis-stating 'facts' in the field, and acting as a marketing division of Apple, was enough to stop me consuming any of their output and banning their IP addresses from all networks I manage.
And it seems 70% of world believes nonsense talking heads.
I saved my father, who had laid in hospital for a month on 60 liters of oxygen. They were talking about putting him into ICU and even kicking around he may need intubation. That alone made me get a nearly $1,000 round trip ticket on the next plane, where I flew across country and right away was sneaking him ivermectin, NAC and Zinc... In a couple days I had his oxygen heading south and in 5 to 6 days they were baffled and talking about releasing him. Say what you want, but he is now home safe well.
You folks will soon learn that we have all been misled.
@@scarlett2299 where you get them?
You must mean 60% oxygen not 60 Lpm.
Good for you, good for your Dad. I don't know what information you used to base your decision on. The fact is any test they put out. Is going to be flawed. Because they are putting Ivermectin against COVID. When what Ivermectin is doing, dealing with the missing link. That lies between the two.
Well done you saved your father
Where did you get the Ivermectin they have priced it out of reach of people
I cancelled my TV licence and stopped listening to the BBC and I've been a lot happier ever since.
If ivermectin really doesn't work at all, why do I see every comment saying it helped? I would expect to see many people saying it didn't help if it was ineffective. I've been reading these positive comments for almost 2 years and they still claim it's dangerous. This really shows the evil.
I once drank some water meant for horses, imagine my relief when I found out horse water was the same as human water.
I eat oats every morning for breakfast -- I hope that won't be a problem for my health.
I think the problems with horse ivermectin tablets are the dosages and the other stuff in the tablets. Please avoid!
It's ironic that they cited an article from the US regarding overdoses of ivermectin …. That has been completely debunked! There have been no rash of overdoses here here in the US!
@@rocketpig1914 exactly. Doctors should be able to prescribe the human formulation!!!
Oh dear, you realise you drank toilet bowl fluid!
The NIH promised to study Ivermectin in Feb 2021, then failed to fund such studies.... I thought at my advanced age I had seen the worst of cynical behavior but the US healthcare machine has topped them all .
You are absolutely correct. I knew our ossified medical system was corrupt but I didn't realize they were also stupid.
Table 2e in NIH website lists it as a treatment for this terrible disease. Imagine that.
Funny how FDA makes fun of people wanting to use the old drug as they say it's for animals and yet the NIH has it listed on their website as a possible treatment.
A Report dated 8 October says US Government has now agreed to fund an ACTIV -6 trial for Iv.m. Goodness knows when we will see the published results. Possible after UK PRINCIPLE TRIAL which some say was designed to fail
James Young, what you're saying is that you want to believe ivermectin works no matter what the data says.
“I’m greedy, I want both. I want to help as many people as much as I can.” I really appreciate this sentiment. People who feel unsafe or unsure about one treatment or preventative measure in my opinion should always be allowed guilt free access to the medical assistance that keeps them safest given their personal circumstances or beliefs. We are all so different. We all deserve access to informed consent around our bodies in a way that makes us feel safe and comfortable.
Hope everyone’s doing well.
There is the rub , informed consent With the MRNA vaxes you still can't make an informed decision No data on long term (5 years) side effects
Just took Ivermectin 3days ago! I was having flu like symptoms. Today I feel better! Still having intermittent productive cough. But overall I feel ok.Thank God!
After being a zookeeper for ten years
I never noticed that ivermectin worked on mammals viruses
What dosage?
Hi, where can I buy ivermectin in the UK please?
@@Xyztxo1082India
This is why anything from the BBC needs to be treated with a high level of scepticism. As you allude to John, I wouldn't trust a journalist with my health.
that may apply even harder when it comes to US media. it's pure fucking garbage.
I'd probably replace "the BBC" in that sentence with "the popular press." And this certainly isn't novel advice.
@@emceemk Agreed. I only said BBC as that's the organisation being referred to here.
All MSM in the western world are littered with communists, trying to brainwash everyone into their garbage politics, basicly a communist coup going on.
Not just BBC. Virtually every "Mainstream Media" (MSM) outlet, anything that gets paid by interested parties (usually in the form of ads and shady deals) who basically dictates what should or won't be said.
For instance, think that US MSM gets paid hundreds of millions from China: no wonder they can't criticize any of it and must comply to blatantly reproduce and validate Chinese state media propaganda. This is just one example. Whether you think it's good or bad is besides the point, which that discourse by these media corporations is simply skewed, not accurate, ON PURPOSE, i.e. not information let alone deontic behavior given their mission statements.
Your sarcasm is so sharp, you left the article in shreds! 😂😂😂😂😂
unfortunately i think many american viewers will miss it completely.
It was indeed a brilliant display ridicule. And we’ll deserved. Sadly the BBC has become utterly unreliable and is imploding under the weight of its own political bias and woke agendas.
We cancelled our TV license many years ago after watching BBCs decline. No way am
I contributing financially to the unrepentant gibberish now being spewed forth from the Bullshit Broadcasting Corporation.
RIP article. RIP BBC.
At this point if you lot don't see it, then something has happened to you psychologically over the last 19 months. And that's not your fault. You are suffering from a fear-based mental disorder brought on by a coordinated assault from paid media, scientists and so called medical truth tellers. There is no other explanation. We are on the threshold of fascist rule and our children's futures might just be sold down the river forever. A life of pharmaceutical tyranny awaits them because you comply with the governments ridiculous commands.
@@SpindicateAudio But not all of us.
Thank you Campbell for teaching basic stuff like HDM; Hypothetical Deductive Method, and for taking your time to read out loud and go through these steps. Why on earth are journalists allowed to publish such political propaganda or obfuscation?
"journalists"
Because people buy it. This is all that is required for journalism sales, and for medical treatment in the US.
@@davidk7544 Fear mongering and entertainment value?
@@davidk7544 Selling gossip is not journalism.
Because that is what their bosses tell them to write.
John, please keep doing what you do. The world needs more people like you now more than ever.
He won't stop
He's has never earned such easy money
The damage main stream media across the globe has done is irreparable.
Not only that , but also the clowns that are parroting what NSM say as empirical truths
Loved your analysis of this article. Thank you!
I'm told that almost all planetary media is now in just a few super-rich hands.
Falsehood is always fought with truth.
At this point if you lot don't see it, then something has happened to you psychologically over the last 19 months. And that's not your fault. You are suffering from a fear-based mental disorder brought on by a coordinated assault from paid media, scientists and so called medical truth tellers. There is no other explanation. We are on the threshold of fascist rule and our children's futures might just be sold down the river forever. A life of pharmaceutical tyranny awaits them because you comply with the governments ridiculous commands.
Never have I seen a medicine so marginalised because of politics. Potentially costing lives
Potentially? I think they are seeking execution for some of the Indian officials who blocked the use of that drug especially after it “coincidentally” ended the pandemic in some Indian states.
Not potentially costing lives.....REALLY COSTING LIVES.
how dare you! it cost big pharma/politicians millions to have a generic do what the new drugs haven't been able to do! you should realign your priorities really, lives are not the issue here, its the bottom line of companies! get your mind straight!
At least it will get rid of your worms. 🪱 and maybe send you on to the next lifetime. I hope the poor horses don’t have to go without as idiots stock up on their de-wormer Pathetic
Never have I seen a medicine so promoted because of politics.
The fact that all of this information is out there, but no one really hears about it from any official sources unless they go looking for themselves is shameful. At least we have some good people like Dr. Campbell who's doing his best to make sure everyone is as informed as possible and looking out for the general well being of everyone out there.
Shameful or not the question is WHY?
They are the 1930s german people.
@@ewa.siwiec Do not ask questions, just do as you are told.
This is why ratings are down for mainstream news and podcasters like Joe rogan are gaining so many viewers.
@@mjb9455 STFU with the false analogies .
Thought I'd walk away from this video absolutely infuriated, ended up almost applauding at the screen. What a well-made lesson in analyzing news articles as to whether or not they're trustworthy, and it should be shown to every high school student.
Exactly
I see this type of "journalism" in Canada as well. And they keep referencing "Horse Medications" instead of recognizing the human Ivermectin has been around for a while and has won a Nobel Prize.
Ivermectin is excellent at treating parasitic infections for humans as well as animals. Whether it is any use for treating Covid is questionable according to some of the latest studies (the Together trial for example).
Exactly! Just like the American media. However, to be fair-there is a variation/dosage that is for horses. Anyone who has known about this early on should have informed themselves better-a dosage of it designed for humans is what is needed. There are a number that did not follow that important step. Now whether it is effective or not-well that is another matter
Yes it did win a nobel prize, yes it is safe for human use. But your forgetting something, it didn't win the nobel prize for use against viruses and it doesn't have any solid evidence for efficacy against Covid-19.
@@jordanleo Exactly! And the original research that gave them the idea was an in vitro result with a far higher dose than could be given to patients.
Dr. Campbell's phrase that the BBC 'used to be good' can be applied to the CBC as well.
Funny how they’re all of the sudden worried about side effects when you bring up ivermectin 😅
Yeah, because the occurrence of side effects in the vaccine is statistically zero, while with ivermectin, faaaar more.
@@aleks5405 and actual research, done by doctors (not nurses like this "doctor") claims that the vaccine is the safest option we have and it proves that ivermectin has no actual effect in treatment of covid
@@stuartbluefield769 I agree. The WHO needs to answer for giving millions of doses of ivermectin to Africa. The side effects are horrendous. Should have just left them go blind
@@stuartbluefield769 statistically zero side effectsm. Eight thousand plus have died in the U.S. alone from the poke per the cdc. That isn't counting all of the disorders it has caused. Myocarditis, blood clots, Guillaume barrettes syndrome, localized cancer at injection site, and a whole other host of problems.
@@stuartbluefield769, ivermectin is more safe than ibuprofen. How about that?
Professor Campbell (to me), I appreciate your informal but timely and critical education on how the world is dealing with COVID, or not. I must say the restraint you show in your treatment of scientific misuse and abuse by some portions of the media is laudable. I see your restraint speaking volumes which hopefully isn't lost on the rest of your viewers.
Ivermectin has genuine results, it helps, just because it is used for parasite treatment does not mean it cannot have other effects, Ivermectin has saved lives.
I have been in medical practice for 45 years. I refused to have the vaccine due to its experimental nature, and the fact that it does have serious side effects. Do you still think this is the safe way to go?
Ivermectin is used for LOTS of things. My dermatologist prescribed me an Ivermectin cream to treat Rosacea.
"The BBC used to be really good."
"Who debunks the debunkers?"
Good points.
"When you know the plan, the journey is easy to predicit".
The next lockdown is pivotal to their plans because they have got to turn the screw and drive those who haven't already had the jabs through discriminating against their medical status (digital ID's/covid freedom passes). Boris and co will come out and say "we have to lockdown again because "vaccine" uptake isn't high enough" to justify the draconian measures that await. They'll shut down buisnesses, lockdown hospitality and make it a dark winter in multiple levels to drive people against eachother and scapegoat us (the unvaccinated). These lockdowns will happen mid to late November.
Well... The idea is that the BBC has and maintains a reputation and then errors are dug into.
I used to like Nevermind the Buzzcocks
The BBC are a satanic entity and always have been
Who watches the watchers?
I like how you said the BBC "used to be really good". Implying it is no longer good
its pure shit now.
Not an implication rather a statement of fact.
well if they still were they wouldnt have release something like this unless it was meant to be for the bbc3 audiences
It's good for information with what's going on in the world but that's about it
@@davidscully2414 i stopped watching the BBC when I noticed their "comedy" shows had more cheering and clapping at political statements than laughing at jokes. Its like they dont even try to hide their bias.
I had been inadvertently diverted for about a year away from Dr John Campbell’s information channel. Wow this guy changed his painfully neutral tune to very well justified sarcasm. Bravo!
He now scoffs. Most unattractive.
Thank you Dr. John. What is terrifying, is that people will believe the BBC with no discussion. Also that the BBC seems to be supporting the UK government and its wild fire crack down on the unvaccinated. No, I am not anti-VAX at all, but I am pro science, and extremely grateful for the reports that are presented here by Dr. John Campbell.
The mRNA injections are not vaccines. Even Murderna admitted that in their annual shareholder filings. They called it gene therapy
For the truth, not either lies or misinterpretation of data see UA-cam videos:1) Absolute nonsense from Josh Campbell about MS, vaccination and the WHO
2) Ivermectin saved Japan from Covid 19 was always bunk
3) 15 million excess deaths (2020 - 2021) estimated by WHO
4) What do excess deaths tell us about true human cost
5) Dr John Campbell Pfizer antiviral/Ivermectin misinformation
6) Freedom of misinformation: Dr John Campbell misuse and manipulation of Covid 19 deaths
And many many more.
That Merck didn't want to do the study says it all.
Thank you Doctor John. I as a Brit who lives abroad I have relied on the BBC for reliable news. I have unfortunately seen a gross plunge in quality of reporting over the last few years even down to spelling and grammar. You obviously feel strongly and quite rightly so. Thanks for the real facts.
I love your objectivity. I wish people in charge of health guidance would have half of what you have.
The BBC? Since when do they qualify as a reliable source on this matter?
On any matter?
About the same time Bill Gates became an authority on vaccines...
Bravo bravo. At least some people aren’t afraid to call out bullshit.
The bullshit comes from this channel. Wake up.
A UA-cam video published on 6 March 2021 featured physician Tess Lawrie, who claimed that ivermectin reduces the risk of death from COVID-19. This claim was based on a meta-analysis and review that Lawrie conducted using 27 scientific studies summarized in a review by an organization called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). The video received over 140,000 views on UA-cam as of writing this article.
Contrary to the video’s claim, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study by López-Medina et al. showed that ivermectin is unlikely to be effective in patients with mild COVID-19[7]. This study was well-designed and doesn’t possess many of the limitations present in the clinical trials cited in Lawrie’s meta-analysis. Since this study was double-blinded, neither the trial participants nor the researchers knew if they had received or administered the placebo or the drug being tested. This design helps to eliminate bias. That being said, the authors concluded that larger trials need to be conducted to better understand the effect of ivermectin on COVID-19.
The video also misleads viewers by suggesting that safety data regarding a drug’s use for one purpose applies to different uses. Although scientists have known about ivermectin for more than forty years and it has been used to treat parasitic infections, this isn’t relevant to the safety of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.
Simply because a drug is safe to use for one disease doesn’t mean that it’s safe to use for another disease. Physiological changes produced by one disease doesn’t translate to the same changes in the case of another disease. The differences in physiological states can mean that the drug is safe to use for certain diseases, but not others. Indeed, many drugs have contraindications, or conditions in which the drug shouldn’t be used because it can harm the patient.
In short, while ivermectin is safe to use for treating parasitic infections, this doesn’t automatically mean it will be safe for COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we also don’t know how ivermectin may interact with other drugs given as standard treatment against COVID-19 and the risks associated with these potential interactions. Therefore, it is misleading to claim that ivermectin is safe for COVID-19 patients on the basis of its safety for treating parasitic infections.
Overall, given the lack of evidence supporting ivermectin’s efficacy and safety, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration doesn’t recommend the use of ivermectin for COVID-19. The Infectious Diseases Society of America also doesn’t recommend the use of ivermectin against COVID-19.
@@Shelmerdine745 Hi, Paid Troll. Big Pharma paying you?
@@Shelmerdine745 Too many details go over your head, obviously. Stick to MSM, sheeple
@@JasonCarney. 😂😂😂😂😂
This video is SO important. Thank you. It's terrifying how this kind of poor journalism is allowed on the BBC. Plus, I think your "cynical" take on why Merck declined to conduct a clinical trial is likely bang on.
It is because every news is corrupted.
In a million years, I could not express the level of my gratitude for this video.
This is why I watch this channel. There's simply too much spin on the telly coming from politicians and invested parties
"When you know the plan, the journey is easy to predicit".
The next lockdown is pivotal to their plans because they have got to turn the screw and drive those who haven't already had the jabs through discriminating against their medical status (digital ID's/covid freedom passes). Boris and co will come out and say "we have to lockdown again because "vaccine" uptake isn't high enough" to justify the draconian measures that await. They'll shut down buisnesses, lockdown hospitality and make it a dark winter in multiple levels to drive people against eachother and scapegoat us (the unvaccinated). These lockdowns will happen mid to late November.
Either the people in charge are really smart or really stupid , both scenarios are terrifying.
Neither. Just prostituting themselves to Big Pharma.
Money is I believe it’s becoming clearer an clearer money money money this is just genius what this is doing to science an the future of medicine!
if it was stupidity it wouldn't be happening worldwide, making all the same mistakes/propaganda/indoctrination/coercion/shaming/bribery/mandates/arrests/fines at the same time. It's something else.
Fancy seeing you here CP
Dismiss via by whatever means necessary (BAMN). By whatever means necessary doesn't mean for you to have expectations of rebuilding/replacing at equal or greater value. So, ivermectin is now cursed
Perfect! Finally someone that clear as daylight on a Midsummers evening, says that there is so much interest in putting down any treatment that might actually help patients. and that being backed up by socalled scientists, who did their work in a very unprofessional maner, to say the least.
Thank you John, for exposing this in a very neutral and professional manner.
Kind regards.
In the US there is a reason why there is interest by the media and government to put down any treatments. If a treatment comes up, then they could not have used the Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines. Once you understand that, its very simple to understand why so much pressure was put on to put down anything which might show itself to be an effective treatment of covid.
It makes me wonder how many lost their lives due to this obsession over the vaccine.
God bless you. The way you explain things so clearly and your medical knowledge is incredible. Literally a treasure to humanity.
Of course, Merck would not run clinical trials on Ivermectin. Not when they're pushing their ridiculously expensive Mulnopiravir.
Ok, but remember not collecting the data doesnt prove the drug works.
No one is studying whether drinking 20 glasses of water a day will cure covid.
That doesn't prove water works to cure covid.
And just because water is cheap and safe again doesn't mean water has efficacy againt covid.
These two views seem to make up most of the pro ivermectin views
@@nosuchthing8 Except water isn't being used to treat covid patients across the globe for over a year now. Water doesn't have the weight of data to suggest efficacy, ivermectin has. Water isn't an irritant to pharmaceutical companies who stand little to gain from it's deployment and government actors who associate it with the counter vaccine movement. When public policy is shaped by corporate lobbyists, you can be damn sure that any potential treatment that doesn't stand to make a sizeable profit for someone, is pretty much dead in the water, regardless of it's efficacy.
They want to create and sell a new drug that does the same job as Ivermectin. So they have a fresh patent for their new drug and if it becomes a huge hit in the markets they will profit pretty well, which would be impossible with Ivermectin which is an old drug and its patent expired decades ago. If they did clinical trials and tested the efficacy of Ivermectin against Covid-19, and if that research showed that indeed Ivermectin is an effective drug against Covid-19, that would be bad for the sales of their new drug.
You don't have to be a scientist to guess what they do.
@@nosuchthing8 The NIH itself has 15 studies showing that it is up to 87% effective at keeping covid sufferers out of hospital. It can be used right away rather than waiting until your lips turn blue and the virus has replicated. Basically you came here to marginalise the truth. The more you people try, the more you become visible to us all.
@@room007 People have been taking it but the published reliable data shows it is no more effective than a placebo. India and Peru are no longer recommending it. Together Trial, who are trying to find cheap drugs for poor and middle income countries proved it didn't work. But they did find other cheap alternatives which work - why does everyone bang on about ivermectin?
You also hit the nail on the head about Merc, with ivermectin no patent = no money = no clinical trials
No effect
Merck is trying to debunk and destroy a drug they held the patent on until 1997. Ivermectin is the generic name. There is no money to be made in making and selling generic medicines. Merck needed a new cash cow.
@@sassylady2001
Liar
The fact remains that Ivermectin may be out of patent, but Merk is still a major manufacturer and distributor of the drug and they are telling people not to take it for Covid as the research is yet to provide evidence of efficacy.
Surely you can't be that myopic @@Shelmerdine745, to believe a company like Merk (who incidentally sold, a haemophilia medication, that was designed for children to the French government, knowing full well prior to the sale that it had been made from blood contaminated with HIV, causing thousands of french children to contract HIV as a result) you think they wouldn't put profit before patients?
Especially when you consider the fact that in late 2018 Pfizer bought Merk shortly after Merk had bought monsanto
Pfizer by the way, holds the world record for the largest corporate fine ever given to a company of $4.3 billion in 2012 for their swine flu vax that killed thousands of people worldwide. Do you honestly think that Pfizer would allow merk (who you've now learnt that pfizer owns) to render their main cash cow, netting pfizer alone $3 trillion since it's rollout, utterly pointless to allow for a treatment that makes them nothing in comparison? A vaccine, i might add that they will rollout every 3 months like clovkwork, because now they're trying to make it so you've no choice but to take it by law?
Are you beginning to see how calling that person a liar, who clearly knows more than you do, might make you even stupider than you already are?
Not only that, but the information I've just given you, if you've actually got a functioning brain that's able to think, should make you at least question whether, all this, that's happening, is really about a virus at all?
If not, then but out moron, you gerbils are why we're in this mess!!
It has taken me a while to get to this video. Thank you Dr. John for calling out bad journalism and poor information being relayed in media. Your detail and logic in going through the article is brilliant teaching of critical thinking which is also much lacking in schools worldwide. The clear lack of referencing and a clear lack of proper editing by atrained and informed editor reflects changing standards at the BBC lately. Keep up the great work Dr. John.
Ivermectin saved my life. My covid condition was getting really bad and took some and within half an hour I felt much better and my stomach pain had gotten better.
SAME HERE.
How much did you take in a day?
@@wesleyau4446 I am not a doctor so I cannot give a dosage. I took only a pea size amount.
@@stonynotdusty what do you mean pea size? one or two pills?
@@wesleyau4446 when I took I took the one for 🐎 s, I squeezed from the tube the amount the size of a pea. (Princess and the PEA)
The BBC using the term 'debunked'. The absolute irony and state of it all.
There is something going on underneath the undermining of the facts almost on a world level. Is it any wonder that we are losing confidence in the establishment?
The BBC has received £50 million from Bill Gates (the BMGF); The Guardian, £12 million. Tories censor anything decent that BBC journos write, according to Media Lens. BTW Starmer is buddies with CCDH - What a fckng useless choice we have at the next election.
BBC is banned in my home for good reason.
@@maccagrabme Same here apart from my wife wife keeps listening to the BBC news.
Wonderful - as a PhD biologist I have for years tried to get news agencies to get academics to check their journalists but they don’t get it. Maybe because too many bbC managers are arts graduates with zero science education.
Do you think.......
"When you know the plan, the journey is easy to predicit".
The next lockdown is pivotal to their plans because they have got to turn the screw and really drive those who haven't already had the jabs through discriminating against their medical status (digital ID's/covid freedom passes). Boris and co will come out and say "we have to lockdown again because "vaccine" uptake isn't high enough" to justify the draconian measures that await. They'll shut down buisnesses, lockdown hospitality and make it a dark winter in multiple levels to drive people against each other and scapegoat us (the unvaccinated). These lockdowns will happen mid to late November
It's more likely you will end up with journos fact-checking your biology papers than the other way around.
many western journalists are controlled and paid by CIA
BBC are not interested in getting the information or facts. They spread propaganda to the uninformed
Dr. Campbell, you should have ended that video with a literal mic drop. Thanks for being a voice of reason and sanity. Thanks for representing science well in a time when many other supposed scientists have become politicized or corrupted. And thanks for calling out unthinking, idealogical psuedo journalists like these clowns.
Used it a couple weeks ago. Veridex. I didn't have it the first day and a half and was absolutely miserable. When it arrived I took it and the symptoms reduced about 60-70 % within 2-3 hours. I don't know why it works, but it does. So, do other Meds. The anti-malarials seem to be working, also. I have only used the Ivermectin.
What symptoms did you have? Leg heaviness that causes exhaustion? How much and for how long did you take Ivermectin. Are you healed now?
I've now come around to see that this guy has cajones. LOVE his droll delivery.
Isn't that confirmation bias 101?
@ Jonathan
Fully agree. The guy really made me laugh in his Ivermectin or Molnupiravir when he read out the summary of that Cochrane report. He made me laugh even more when he said that his tummy was hurting so he was going to consult a journalist instead of a doctor. As far as ‘confirmation bias’ guy goes I find that term to be used by those who can’t win arguments with their intellect so they claim bias.
Jonathan Bell, I think you mean "cojones"? "Cajones" with an "a" means "drawers". I'm sure his desk has drawers. ;-)
I wish everyone had the cojones to put their real names on their bullshit comments.
@@keithbrady9754 CoHones, guys and girls.
You find the BBC’s reporting surprising, I find it reprehensible.
They have lost all credibility. I gave up on them last year, when they did a hit-piece on Vitamin D - which persuaded my 97 year old father to stop taking it (I'd been sending him it in the post during lockdown). They are indeed utterly reprehensible.
I think that's just his police way of saying reprehensible.
Anytime you hear the "main stream" m e di a using the term "d e b u n k" you know they are l y i n g.
One of the establshmnt's favor1te b u z z terms is "d e b u n k." That means an attempt to s l a n d e r any view they don't apprve of. "D e b u n k", "f a c t c h e c k," etc, are b u z z terms that ALWAYS needs to raise a r e d f l a g in the viewer.
I find it typical of the BBC. Sometimes I think their reports are written by 17yr olds on work experience from 6th form. I’ve actually read BBC reports that have clearly just been lifted, word for word, straight from other media sources. Oh well, they can’t spell, their grammar is terrible but at least they have access to google.
It’s rather telling that their own article fails the points they say should be required for valid studies. Amazing how many people read the headlines with no understanding of where it comes from. Thank you for what you do!
Are we able to get a follow-up for the research from Japan if possible? This would be truly wonderful.
Correction: _"The BBC _*_used to have_*_ a really good reputation"_ Sadly, after seeing their hyperbole and disinformation in regards to material that falls within my scope of expertise I believe they are no longer a credible source of objective reporting.
And they wonder why people want to defund them.
Indeed. That is usually the big giveaway .....when they 'report' something on a subject in which one has a substantial body of knowledge and it is complete nonsense and, as you say, disinformation. It is then that you realise that similar disinformation MUST be happening in other subject areas too. The BBC used to be the equivalent of a broadsheet. Now it is a rather downmarket tabloid. Full of sensationalism, bias, baiting and puff pieces.
BBC - never mind their decades long cover-up of child exploitation. Can they be trusted about anything ?
Reporting standards have gone downhill everywhere in the last two decades.
They just push an agenda. They are not journalists.
You can hear in the good Doctors voice that he is bewildered and disgusted with what’s been going on.
Many good people are!
"When you know the plan, the journey is easy to predicit".
The next lockdown is pivotal to their plans because they have got to turn the screw and really drive those who haven't already had the jabs through discriminating against their medical status (digital ID's/covid freedom passes). Boris and co will come out and say "we have to lockdown again because "vaccine" uptake isn't high enough" to justify the draconian measures that await. They'll shut down buisnesses, lockdown hospitality and make it a dark winter in multiple levels to drive people against each other and scapegoat us (the unvaccinated). These lockdowns will happen mid to late November.
Well done, Dr Campbell. Your reasoned and well-considered video has resulted in the BBC updating their article on Ivermectin. You successfully held a "fact checker" to account. Sadly, it's taken more than a million views on your video for them to update the article. It's sad that the BBC continues to "fact check" the science with such unbalanced and weak journalism.
Thank you Dr. Campbell for helping us understand information related to Covid, protection and treatment
BBC and many other "reputable" news agencies have shown their true colors
Yes, I just hope the public remembers all this after the pandemic is over, the news organisations, governments and individuals that collaboratored with big pharma to surpress Ivermectin, costing millions of lives. This should never be forgotten.
this is exactly what trump supporters were saying. he was clearly a lunatic and so are many of the ivermectin freaks
Commie colours
@@twmd You are aware of how successful Ivermectin has been in India aren't you? Oh, wait, no the media refuse to do much coverage on that. Hmmm, wonder why...
@@yoyoma17 so why don't you provide us the evidence?
Even our dear doctor is seeing it that there is something else going on.
At last !!!
His regard for "science" must be sorely shaken by now.
Thank god he’s finally seeing the light!
Let's hope so ....what's going on around the world is criminal IMO
I have to commend the impeccable way in which he conveys and expresses his concerns and remarks though. I haven't heard a more subtle, diplomatic yet incredibly clear way of wording things in a very long time. I immensely appreciate John's choice of words in every situation. The attention to detail and boundaries is spectacular, I can't stop admiring the sharpness of his mind.
This isn't a 'paper'. This is a correspondence letter "to the editor". These are intended to be "brief comments on topical issues of public and political interest relating to research, anecdotal material or readers' reactions to informal material". This isn't a news story or a conclusion, it is a part of how science is done and evolves. It's fine to disagree, that's the point. Your last comment is purely your own interpretation of what they said. They didn't say we should rip up previous studies, they proposed a better way to publish and do this research, and a high chance of bias in a methodology can exist alongside getting valid results from said methodology.
The quick camera angle swaps and pause for dramatic effect were on point too
Ivermectin .40 cents for five day treatment, Merck’s new CoVid pills, 700$ dollar, and the CEO’s just made the Forbes richest list
Ivermectin is not as effective as the new antiviral drug. Ivermectin to an actual antiviral is like a vitamin being compared to an antibiotic when treating bacterial infection.
@@xponen You know this how?
Where to get Ivermectin that cheap - if I get it anyway
@@xponen is it? Wow. Where was this large scale clinical comparative study done
@@xponen Bull Shit. Ivermectin is actually listed as an anti viral along with anti parasitic for human use. My daughter was prescribed Ivermectin. Her diagnosed Covid was gone in a week. All, and I repeat ALL, of the anti Ivermectin papers are biased. Imagine if it got out that we had an effective therapeutic and it was suppressed so that a vaccine could be sold to the entire population of the planet.
The BBC has been releasing propaganda for years, like most main stream channels. That's why I watch this channel.
Yeah like saying Building 7 had collapsed with no casualties on live TV..... while it still stood in the New York skyline.
20 minutes later.... it collapsed. (Work that script out!?)
They won't even show what's happening in Aus at the moment
Why is youtube or this guy erasing proven facts and medicine? blackhoof mushroom in the PubMed is pretty revealing... I type this and this nonsense erases my LITERAL FACT comment.. i said 0 words at all that could be flaggable, just the name of a mushroom that works
@@chrish9164 Okay, the time was a bit off, but still, it was a very good prediction. Lots of architects and engineers still don't understand how that building came down. A university in Alaska found out that it could be done by cutting more than 80 steel columns at the same time. NIST said it could be done by one girder sliding off of one column, but - for obvious reasons - publishing their modelling and animation program would endanger public safety.
@@terrymoney9718 Avi, Rebel News. See pigs push over 70yo woman for doing nothing....and then pepper spray directly into her eyes. Those CNUTS want dealing with.
MSM show grafted version of peaceful demonstrators on one street and pigs on another and graft the two together in some CG-esque lash-up..
Why would the drug companies push a drug that costs pennies to make, when they can repackage it, and sell it for thousands
No one is doing that though are they you liar? The drug is free for ANYONE to make, ANYONE to test and there is STILL no reliable evidence of its effectiveness or otherwise when there are countries all around the world DESPERATE for affordable, effective treatment. Ever wonder why?
It's a different drug, with different mechanism..... BUT it IS the same company (apparently) tasked with making the decision to conduct a proper test, or not.
The main question is, WHY wasn't the same company pressured into conducting a proper survey in 2020, which would have decided the controversy..... Either way?
They wouldn't but socialized healthcare systems in the UK and other countries prefer cheap drugs wherever possible. And they're not recommending Ivermectin at present. Although Ivermectin works in vitro, there's serious questions about whether that translates to in vivo efficacy due to the way the drug is absorbed.
Invermectin saves lives, Remdesiver ends them.
@@theredboneking Indonesia is currently not talking anything about the drug, but we can buy it anywhere, even I can order it online, the price has been adjusted but it's still much cheaper than molnupravir. I like my country's stance
You should look into Merck clinical trials. They owned ivermectin and came to the conclusion it does not work for coivd.
It's completely normal for PhD students to be lead authors on papers in Biology. It happens frequently. It's very odd of you to insinuate otherwise, or think this has any impact on the quality of the paper... "Some might find that surprising" - but they would be revealing their general ignorance of how the field works.
I wonder if Nurse Campbell's PhD (in 'developing open learning resources for nurses) was a mail-order one?
It is extremely disingenuous of Campbell NOT to present his actual qualifications/area of expertise in a prominent position in his videos. So many people are assuming that he is a medical doctor, and consequently trusting that he is knowledgeable about the topics. He has misinterpreted and misrepresented everything about this research.
Better reporting here than one ever sees on the BBC these days.
Each and everyday since Feb-Mar 2020!!
That's not saying too much may I add.
This guy is a pharma shill...opinion piece on an opinion piece... shill
@@locktotheblock7091 yet he supplied more evidence than the opinion piece
@@daveoc1010 no he didn't.. we have acclaimed professors in Australia that have proven ivermectin (Nobel prize) .. saved millions of lives in India doh... he is selectively choosing data and is paid off..
Why would Merck do clinical trials on ivermectin when it has a new replacement that costs 100 times more?
In finance we call this a “perverse incentive”. A financial incentive where profit is not aligned with the public interest.
They probably just reworked the formula for Vitamin I by adding a little HCQ.
Exactly
Please don't bring logic and rational thinking to a conspiracy fest!
ua-cam.com/video/PnVAVDpTwEk/v-deo.html
He explains merc
For what this is worth:
I live in Colombia.
I've been struggling with fatigue, sweats, chest pain, and shortness of breath since I had pneumonia in May. They did several swabs at the time, which wasn't until I already had been sick 3 weeks because I was "not sick enough." Of course, they all came back as Covid negative.
I recently had a blood test and asked them to include covid antibodies. Unfortunately, the results only told me that I had a past covid infection with a current negative IgM and Positive IgG for Covid.
I started taking hydroquinone (not ivermectin) 3 days ago. After the second dose, I noticed an improvement in the "long-covid" symptoms. I'm going back to the pharmacy for 20 more tablets. I consult my doctor in the US but don't need a prescription since almost everything is OTC here. (A single does here costs about $3.50)
There is no problem with a student being a lead author. PhD research are also performed by "students". Also, even if it is an undergrad student, they might have previous qualifications in research, and even if that isn't the case the senior author on a paper is always placed last and they will have the "supervisory" role.
If Doctors are allowed to treat as they feel is necessary then people would not turn to back room methods.
Hospitals are not allowing and pharmacies will not fill prescriptions
Your statement is true!
What's weird about this situation.... is that the front line medics who started using this product (using my words carefully due to censorship) WERE treating their patients as they felt necessary.... and simply tried to tell the world - because it worked.
Then the power brokers of the world tried to crush this truth from all angles.... through both censorship and outright propaganda.
It's been unbelievable
@@chrish9164 many whom vote for biden are mentally ill to evil because they ignore fact that some republicans are like CIS of starwars always playing bad cop 50% to dnc good cop act.
example both pelosi with paul ryan do cracy omnibus for foreign whoring, muller claim russia hack election break glass 2017 inauguration because they want to continue a program call kill iraq to syria. all that wasted trillions by pelosi with 300 house members culd have been better used to give all medicare.
ua-cam.com/video/_mrJRHwbVG8/v-deo.html
during h1n1 media allow treating covid symptoms to lower death, but 2020 they smear ban treat covid symptoms to up death count
dems incite violence to kill people using smears like uneducated/facists because they want non western nations like mexico to remain cheap outsource low inflation for the rich by leech usa welfare through daca, they even give double standard climate climate regulations call developing status
@@perspectiveme many whom vote for biden are mentally ill to evil because they ignore fact that some republicans are like CIS of starwars always playing bad cop 50% to dnc good cop act.
example both pelosi with paul ryan do cracy omnibus for foreign whoring, muller claim russia hack election break glass 2017 inauguration because they want to continue a program call kill iraq to syria. all that wasted trillions by pelosi with 300 house members culd have been better used to give all medicare.
ua-cam.com/video/_mrJRHwbVG8/v-deo.html
during h1n1 media allow treating covid symptoms to lower death, but 2020 they smear ban treat covid symptoms to up death count
dems incite violence to kill people using smears like uneducated/facists because they want non western nations like mexico to remain cheap outsource low inflation for the rich by leech usa welfare through daca, they even give double standard climate climate regulations call developing status
Ironically, yet another one of their own arguments for legalized abortion, just like my-body-my-choice.
I’ve been noticing for many months lots of media reporting, not just the BBC, which seems to wrongly emphasise the drug’s usage for animals without mentioning that it’s been used for ages in humans. It’s very jarring and very amateurish. The BBC is not what it once was.
"Easy journalism".
CNN is far worse. It's soo sad. They are pretty much just shills for the rich and powerful that they should be the watchdogs of.
Fauci HIMSELF has said this in a speech, that Ivermectin is a drug for animals ...implying ONLY
Or u just see now what you didn't b4
Have a look at The Independent's article on Ivermectin, it was shocking not only in its contents, but that they think they can get away with it ...
Enjoyed this review by Dr. Campbell. Sad to see that the BBC has deteriorated as much as the media in the USA.
I love this. Informative, credible, useful, and open minded without a trace of venom. So refreshing.
As in America..the press thinks we are all stupid...smh!!!!
The media taking money from big drug companies.
and Australia ... don't leave us out.
The press has always been about ad revenue. It used to have more focus on legit journalism... but as long as people keep soaking up the content and giving them the attention, they have no incentive to change.
Alas I fear that most do swallow it all whole. And they retain that crucial veneer of legitimacy
@@thequantaleaper BBC doesn't run ads in the UK (it's paid for by UK television viewers). They do are pretty motivated by clicks, but I think there's more to their story
You mean Merck, the company that just applied for EUA for their less effective drug that competes with ivermectin didn't want to forego Billions in profits?
Yup, ivermectin is patent expired and not as lucrative as vaccines or novel therapeutics.
Angela Volkov ua-cam.com/video/zf3AGckHVvg/v-deo.html&feature=share
Plus Ivermectin is a much better choice for Covid in almost every way you could imagine ... except for profits as you suggest.
Is that the truth?
@@angelavolkov1126 Agreed. But they have a new competing drug, Molnupiravir, that's going to make them billions at $700 per covid case. That's the REAL conflict of interest. It's not about on vs off patent.
Each time someone mentions "animal ivermectin" I really would like to know the exact ingredients of that "animal ivermectin". Most of them (besides ivermectin) contains only polypropylene glycol which is a very basic cosmetic and food industrial additive, and as such, really harmless. If you spend few minutes to check the ingredients of an animal ivermectin, you can find relatively good amount of absolutely safe ivermectin for low price with a high chance.
A man in America has cured his stage four cancer with Panacur C a dog dewormer and my son has been taking it since he was diagnosed with terminal bladder cancer in 2018 and given less than a year to live and his cancer has gone.
@@juyjohnstone9451 Why? Can you tell me more detail?
@@juyjohnstone9451 any ideas of the dosage ?
@@juyjohnstone9451Is that true???
I love how Dr. Campbell shows his anger - with sarcasm and analogy - and a bit of an edge to his voice 🤣
He is starting to see the shadow being cast from the 'other-side'....
Not a Dr. Campbell.
That is the British way. It's their national super power. Nigel Farage gives seminars on the subject which are not to be missed. LOL/.
We need anger. People are dying every day. Dr. Malone, Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr. Pierre Kory, etc. They are angry. Nurse Campbell is wasting your time with his underlining and keep a foot in both sides. And pushing the vaccine, ALways! I am disgusted by him.
@@bother2adapt exactly 💯
Dr. Campbell, thank you for your "reality checks" and polite sarcasm (the best kind) about medical conjectures made by journalists. The world needs more medical professionals like you.
He’s not a medical professional. He’s a retired nurse trainer and doctor of philosophy. Sarcasm is the worst form of humour. He cites and repeats a lot of very dubious research and statements of fact which are not factual, allies himself with other dodgy ‘medical’ professionals who cite half-baked statistics in the hope of misleading the average joe/Joanne . Heaven help us if the world needs more self-appointed experts like this bloke.
@@RobinoftheHod Like what? There’s no legitimate evidence anywhere that things he endorses like Ivermectin actually have any benefit other than anti-parasitical. Lots of anecdotal stories and dodgy stats. He’s a doctor of philosophy not medicine. He was a nurse trainer. That doesn’t make him an expert in medical research or epidemiology.
@@glynnwadeson5605 So the fact based results from Japan have no meaning to you. He as no hidden agenda unlike yourself, happy to push the vax regardless of facts.
@@limogerry surprise surprise, you send a link to the Group of medical professionals who are loved by the alt right and Anti vaxxers. Their stance is not accepted by most of the world’s medical professionals.
@@limogerry Don’t get your knickers in a twist! The truth hurts I guess.
We gotta stop giving corporate media attention
This is how unbiased review should look like! Thank you John!
"The BBC used to be...."
Indeed, but those times have passed. 😢
A long time ago.
Sadly
This is why Merck doesn’t want us using generic ivermectin….
They just announced the new Molnupiravir that is very very very expensive compared to ivermectin.
Merck and Ridgeback's Investigational Oral Antiviral Molnupiravir.
So sad. Withholding life saving treatments for money.
Hmmm could you imagine Merck putting the word out that they'd pay a handsome fee to anyone prepared to slate ivermectin publicly?
I could imagine that.
Apparently it can also be used for treating horses.
That was was first thought when John said Merck turned down the request to study ivermectin and covid. DUH! No sh*t Sherlock! Of course they don't want ivermectin to be proven to be effective against Covid. It would negate all the profit from their new wonder drug.
Molnupiravir only $700 per patient.
I love how John implied this in his own super-subtle polite way right at the end. He's such a gent. The guy deserves a knighthood in my humble opinion. Not sure it will happen though. The gov hardly seems to listen to him.
"No references = Nothing short of pathetic"
You're a great person/researcher 👍
Yeah, well. You have a doctorate in nursing. You're not a virologist or a pharmacological researcher. I think you should remind your viewers and yourself of this.
Japanese doctors are recommending Ivermectin and it’s currently under clinical trials in Japan.
It's being prescribed all over the world. Mainly in third world countries where they can't afford the vaccines or have severe difficulties administering it. India is a prime example. Portugal, spain, many south american countries as others
at least Japanese doctors are acting like reliable honest quality Toyotas of the medical industry
They seemed to be seemingly implying the batches they received were poisoned, like i worry now about horse paaste.!
I'm going to post this above, but here's my advice after worrying about where to go if I need a doctor: find a family clinic and just ask them what their standard of care is. If it's normal and actually based in science, come up with a planned response for when you feel like it might be COVID coming on. Stay away from the big drug stores and find a local pharmacist. Now, I'm in the least vexed county in my state, so it might have been easier for me to do this (people with cattle know that a herd is meant to be milked or killed, so they're not into it). But a good local pharmacist might help anyone. They might be a little cagey at first, but I just asked "Do you know what the standard of care for COVID treatment is at the hospital here? I want a plan for the winter and don't want to get suffocated to death like a New Yorker." That's how I found a family clinic. From a local family owned pharmacist. This could be easy if we just all walk away from the big boxes and chains.
We the "unvaccinated" are the new Jews.
The following is an article of what the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany. What I've done is changed every mention of the word Jew to "unvaccinated". See if you can see the comparison in relation to today's events:
When Hitler became reich chancellor on the 30th of January 1933, he wasted no time on beginning the Nazi plan of targeting the "unvaccinated". This begin with a campaign of boycotts of "unvaccinated" owned buisnesses facilitated by the muscle of the SA storm troopers. The German Parliament passed a series of anti-"unvaccinated" laws, starting with the law of restoration of the professional civil service on the 7th of April 1933 which took employment rights from the "unvaccinated" public servants and reserved state employment for the "vaccinated". What followed was a systematic evil assult on human rights including forbidding the "unvaccinated" from sitting University exams and prohibiting the owing of anything such a bicycles to pets to precious metals. 1935's Nurembergs laws defined who was "unvaccinated" and who was "vaccinated". They stripped the "unvaccinated" of citizenship. All n all the Nazi regime enacted some 2000 anti-"unvaccinated" decrees, effectively prohibiting all of the "unvaccinated" from taking part in of all facets of public and private life, from work to entertainment to education. The "unvaccinated" were vandalised and burned and killed in the violence and 30,000 were arrested and subsequently sent to newly built concentration camps.
“These five international cyberfriends” 😂😂😂
How do you have a meta-analysis of 26 studies but only 7 references?
How do we explain the thousands in Uttar Pradesh who took Ivermectin and got better?
My buddy’s gf had covid very bad. Her doc prescribed ivermectin, the reason is she has an immune disorder. Started feeling better within a day.
I know an unvaccinated guy who had COVID and took ivermectin. He still wound up in the ICU hooked up to a respirator. I know this other guy who was vaccinated, and he got COVID, but was completely asymptomatic. Why not get vaccinated and take ivermectin if you still wind up needing it?
@@mobus1603 I know an unvaccinated guy who got covid and it was like a mild cold and he lost his taste and smell. Me. I don’t smoke and I’m not fat so I was fine. Since then I’ve been around numerous people with covid including my wife who’s had it twice. Me, no. Fuck an unproven wannabe vaccine. You take it so you can be safe. Don’t worry bout me, if you get vaccinated you are safe, right?
To be fair without treatment and with chicken noodle soup and ginger ale the same would have happened... covid is as scary as a pillow case full of declawed kittens.
@@mobus1603 I hung around three people that had Covid on purpose to see what it would do to me, well it did nothing. Except my oxygen levels were at 93% mostly and some 92% And my pulse rate was in the upper 90s for two months. I felt like I was having to stop and take deep breath’s at times. I never got tested so I don’t know what it was other than those slight symptoms I felt fine and went about my daily life as normal. So I answered your question now answer mine…The world is already overpopulated and being polluted so why in the heck would I get the shot?
@@mobus1603 i know 5 unvaccinated people who had covid. Two suffered as bad as flu - in bed for two weeks, loss of smell and taste. One an old diabetic. All survived. They have since been vaccinated
Ivermectin in small doses must be incredibly effective for such a desperate hit piece to be released at this time.
I bet it's what doctors and nurses have taken for it - since so many of them are evidently "anti-Covid-vax".
If it's in the way of a $700 pill then yes. Obviously.
It is incredibly cheap, so no profits for big pharma. The bigger problem is that the mere existence of an effective therapeutic drug completely demolishes the narrative supporting COVID Passports and the legal frameworks for approving the vaccines.
It saved a friend of mine from covie last december in Texas. Recovered in 8 days. So I do not care at all what the BBC says about it.
Yes. I managed to import some from India to UK. As an additional harmless prohpylactic, I took 2 tabs a month ago and will take one monthly through winter. I will go to fortnightly if covid goes rampant this winter. I have some spare.
I love his witty and dry sarcasm when reviewing the BBC's article and the cyber-friend's report.
Imagine my relief when I found out that he was being sarcastic about the BBC. This video should be sent into the editor and they need to explain how and why it was published
I'm finding that the news media never contains references.. and they when they use an unreferenced article as proof makes it even more dodgey.
It's almost like they couldn't let the facts interfere with their agenda..hmm
We the "unvaccinated" are the new Jews.
The following is an article of what the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany. What I've done is changed every mention of the word Jew to "unvaccinated". See if you can see the comparison in relation to today's events:
When Hitler became reich chancellor on the 30th of January 1933, he wasted no time on beginning the Nazi plan of targeting the "unvaccinated". This begin with a campaign of boycotts of "unvaccinated" owned buisnesses facilitated by the muscle of the SA storm troopers. The German Parliament passed a series of anti-"unvaccinated" laws, starting with the law of restoration of the professional civil service on the 7th of April 1933 which took employment rights from the "unvaccinated" public servants and reserved state employment for the "vaccinated". What followed was a systematic evil assult on human rights including forbidding the "unvaccinated" from sitting University exams and prohibiting the owing of anything such a bicycles to pets to precious metals. 1935's Nurembergs laws defined who was "unvaccinated" and who was "vaccinated". They stripped the "unvaccinated" of citizenship. All n all the Nazi regime enacted some 2000 anti-"unvaccinated" decrees, effectively prohibiting all of the "unvaccinated" from taking part in of all facets of public and private life, from work to entertainment to education. The "unvaccinated" were vandalised and burned and killed in the violence and 30,000 were arrested and subsequently sent to newly built concentration camps.
You can take the "no references" flaw all the way to the beginning of this piece of fiction. Where is the paper that isolates, purifies and publishes the existence of the plague? I defy anyone to find it and produce it.
Where have you been? The BBC has a terrible reputation for propaganda!
It’s difficult for humans to admit they’ve been duped. It’s getting so obvious now people are starting to question.
Yes only rivalled by the CCP.
Their news is all fear and doom then a wee happy story at the end to settle you msm total fear mongerers best wishes from Glasgow scotland
I think you might have missed the all important eye brow lifts and pregnant pause after he said it!
@@quick475 many whom vote for biden are mentally ill to evil because they ignore fact that some republicans are like CIS of starwars always playing bad cop 50% to dnc good cop act.
example both pelosi with paul ryan do cracy omnibus for foreign whoring, muller claim russia hack election break glass 2017 inauguration because they want to continue a program call kill iraq to syria. all that wasted trillions by pelosi with 300 house members culd have been better used to give all medicare.
ua-cam.com/video/_mrJRHwbVG8/v-deo.html
during h1n1 media allow treating covid symptoms to lower death, but 2020 they smear ban treat covid symptoms to up death count
dems incite violence to kill people using smears like uneducated/facists because they want non western nations like mexico to remain cheap outsource low inflation for the rich by leech usa welfare through daca, they even give double standard climate climate regulations call developing status
Thank you Dr John. Your honesty is so appreciated and valuable x
The BBC did indeed "used to" have an outstanding reputation for honest, impartial news, especially the BBC World Service.
"I'll go to a journalist to get properly diagnoded." Dr. Campbell demolishes them in one sentance.
Here here 👍
Diagnosed*
@@Anon-xd3cf predicted text 😂
M Dow but they never mention this , we have a very sick nation including children ua-cam.com/video/JJQ4NBEnrN0/v-deo.html&feature=share
Yes, this tells us much more about the BBC than it does about Ivermectin.
The sarcasm is perfection, Dr. John. The BBC piece is ridiculously shoddy. Smh.
its designed this way... its not just people being dumb or incompetent. It's an agenda.
@don s You’re right that a shoddy article does not give anyone a green light to take ivm. A *prescribing physician may give the green light* if he or she judges it to be medically appropriate for a patient. That’s Dr John’s point: who is more qualified to review the medical literature and make a judgment call for a patient?
He repeats that he wants *both* vaccination and ivm. Remember that sometimes even vaccinated people get extremely sick.
And yes, many of us are looking forward to the ACTIV-6 results and the Oxford PRINCIPLE results. If ivm was so easy to dismiss as “no indication that it works at all for covid” these studies wouldn’t even be happening.
Well, the BBC Better listen to you! Because you have that "Vicious Killer" in the window?😂
My son is taking ivermectin and it has cured his terminal bladder cancer. He was given less than a year to live in 2018 and when he goes for his scans the tumour has gone.
Can you mention the dosage he took, how often and did he take it with fatty foods or on empty stomach ,etc ? Ty
Thank you John for being a voice of reason in these tenuous times.
Shame on the BBC for publishing misinformation.
Lol 😂 and old johnnie’s meta analysis is not ?
I very much doubt it is misinformation. There have been complaints throughout that the favorable studies had problems. Now India has dropped it from their treatment recommendations because it has shown no improvement in patient outcome. We hear about the successes but the failures are swept under the rug. I am disappointed to see the doctor make those same mistakes.
@@flagmichael it is important to realize that "Dr. Campbell" is NOT a medical doctor, though very few of his followers are aware of this fact.
John Campbell is not stating that ivermectin helps or doesn’t help Covid treatment. He’s merely saying that the BBC article was unsubstantiated by clinical evidence either way. This video is a review of journalistic practices, not of the medical efficacy of ivermectin.
If the drug doesn't work, then why has the CDC, WHO, and various European health agencies funded and distributed said drug in over 50 countries?
for the parasitic infection
There's no such thing as 'it works'. It's completely based on the thing you're trying to treat. It works for parasites, the question is does it work for Covid? A drug that is 'safe' doesn't mean it has no side effects or you can't overdose on it. When people take science and medicine into their own hands, the results are much worse than no treatment usually. Just wait until reliable data is in.
@@Octamed it works in Uttar Pradesh and many other StATES in INDIA!
whereas the most gene jabbed countries have increasing "covid" and adverse reactions
@@whoareyapauldunn Mexico, Chile, and other countries have used and distributed Ivermectin kits that have worked and helped to lower cases and improve mortality rates.
@@JS-iz2fk Good to know - Thank You!
John are you seeing the top of the page of the article that says Advertisement? What is that about?
Love your tactful humorous approach to those that mislead humanity , Wish you strength and boldness to be a pioneer for wellness;the world needs heroes like you
i reallly appreciate dr. Campbells politeness when talking about the scientific experise of the journalists :-)
I love his sense of humor in pointing out the ridiculous!
A bit silly, is he really expecting doctors or scientists to do the reporting?
Politeness? Where? He is drooling sarcasm on every word. Really painful to watch and totally biased
They have a job to do too. No matter John’s expertise in teaching nursing, their ability to read and understand science papers is at least equal to his.
@@twntwrs John is not a doctor of science, nor of medicine.