Randy Jackson on Al Sharpton's show - Why Michael Jackson's Will is FAKE sub ita.avi
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- 24th July 2012: Randy Jackson on Al Sharpton's show explains what happened on Monday 23rd July 2012 at Calabasas when he and Janet tried to talk with Michael's kids, Prince and Paris.
Randy claims Michael's Will that allows John Branca and John McClain to handle his Estate IS FAKE and FOR THE FIRST TIME, Rev. Al Sharpton CONFIRMS that Sunday 7th July 2002, the date the Will is supposed to be signed by Michael in Los Angeles, Michael Jackson WAS WITH HIM IN NEW YORK. "THAT SUNDAY WE WERE OUT TOGETHER" Rev. Al Sharpton said.
24 luglio 2012: Randy Jackson, ospite del programma del Reverendo Al Sharpton, spiega cosa è accaduto lunedì 23 luglio 2012 quando lui e Janet hanno provato a parlare con i figli di Michael, Prince e Paris.
Randy afferma che il Testamento di Michael che permette a John Branca e a John McClain di gestire il suo patrimonio E' FALSO e PER LA PRIMA VOLTA il Rev. Al Sharpton CONFERMA CHE QUELLA DOMENICA 7 LUGLIO 2002, la data in cui Michael avrebbe dovuto firmare il Testamento a Los Angeles, MICHAEL JACKSON ERA CON LUI A NEW YORK. "QUELLA DOMENICA ERAVAMO FUORI INSIEME" il Rev. Al Sharpton ha detto.
Certainly. However, the letter the brothers publish state Branca and co send them an UNSIGNNED will, missing last page even! It is well known, to those of us that have actually taken the time (and I mean time) to look into this, that people around MJ knew how to sign like him. In other words forge his sig (due to the high volume of signed photos needed). Listen, I am not against the state and their management. They have done an excelllent, wonderful job BUT the truth is they robbed this!
Agreed! Which is great disrespect to the family.... especially concerning the sketchy dealings with John Branca and Sony. It appears as though he truly betrayed Michael.
questo fatto già circolava, perchè la firma posta sul fake è diversa dall'originale... grazie della traduzione
Grazie per questa preziosa traduzione ...ma sono veramente allibita per quanto sta accadendo e seriamente preoccupata per quei tre ragazzi ..che Mj li protegga ....
When I hear the remarks, 'its a civil family matter,' I'm wary because the last person that used that remark is now in the Hague sentence for War Crimes. The Children are growing fast and will soon be adults then you all would not be able to tug them here there & everywhere. I don't believe you have these children's interest at heart. If you all do care, then you all are going about it the wrong way.
If Mike had zero worth; which one of U 4 would step up & volunteer to rear these children altruisticly. Randy & Germaine have a track record on shirking their responsibilities on Grandma. Y don't these 2 have their offsprings in their homes; nuh its left to poor Catherine. She already reared her 8; so dam unfair. If you're not rearing your own dam kids; we expect U all to rear someone else's; no dam way! As for Janet, she doesn't have a track record of rearing any dam kids; except if its a man!
And not mention the will of his eldest child OMER BAHTTI
Both Michael and Omer always maintained that they are friends and not related by blood, you are delusional.