EAKINS VS RF4 trinocular microscope comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лют 2024
  • For repair, please contact me by following the link in the channel ABOUT page.
    Buy me a candy at paypal.me/tonynameless
    Tools, schematics, boardview files etc are available here
    drive.google.com/drive/folder...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 72

  • @ion1984
    @ion1984 4 місяці тому +14

    i love the way you got to the point right off the bat. hey, dont buy this. a lot of reviewers save that to the end, for viewer retention, but your idea is hey, i dont want ANYONE to get the idea im recommending this thing. very considerate and PRACTICAL, just like everything you do. have a great one!!

  • @Ancientreapers
    @Ancientreapers 4 місяці тому +7

    Nice. Covering repair tools themselves. I like these kind of videos.

  • @pp3v42_g3h
    @pp3v42_g3h 4 місяці тому +7

    ok, I needed exactly this.
    Eakins has this new design too.

  • @natetechr
    @natetechr 4 місяці тому +3

    Thank you for making a video on the RF4 microscope. I've been looking for a review for months.

  • @FuNnY71818
    @FuNnY71818 4 місяці тому +2

    Need more videos like this, thanks

  • @littleboot_
    @littleboot_ 4 місяці тому +1

    I'm looking for a trinocular microscope, thank you for making this review

  • @dukeofdream
    @dukeofdream 4 місяці тому

    I'm using the black eakins for 3 years and i'm really happy with it ^^

  • @alinovslman5336
    @alinovslman5336 4 місяці тому +3

    Thank you.. For saving our money

  • @kentstansberry9748
    @kentstansberry9748 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for your ethics.👍

  • @Djazeiry
    @Djazeiry 4 місяці тому

    thanks a lot dude , it was the right video on the right time , i was going to buy one of those microscopes , now i think i'll go for the mechanic MOS300-B11 , thank you very much

  • @Rmm1722
    @Rmm1722 4 місяці тому

    Good work 💯👏

  • @peterdeyanov5056
    @peterdeyanov5056 4 місяці тому

    I don't know if I provoked this video, but thanks for the information. No matter what the video is, I learn something useful every time. 👍

  • @GameBacardi
    @GameBacardi 4 місяці тому

    Good review 👍🏻👨🏻

  • @alexdrockhound9497
    @alexdrockhound9497 4 місяці тому

    ive been eyeing a microscope like this for examining mineral specimens.

  • @fu1r4
    @fu1r4 4 місяці тому

    What is the reason for two eyepieces, will the depth vision be better than if you had a monitor to look at?

  • @dannysai6258
    @dannysai6258 4 місяці тому +1

    hi guys my gpu doesnt show display , but turning on and i checked and ram and changed cmos battery , hdmi cable is working well. can anyone help

  • @JoaoBatista-hk2iu
    @JoaoBatista-hk2iu 4 місяці тому

    Muito boa 🎉

  • @krisiluttinen
    @krisiluttinen 2 місяці тому

    When you looked through that RF4 without a barlow lense, did you notice the components/subject appears way too tall? Like everything that is small looks deeper and taller than it should be. Is that normal? does it happen on the other model Eakins oem? When attaching the barlow lense this problem seems to get corrected. This is happening on my new RF4 RF6565PRO head.

  • @Fixforfixing
    @Fixforfixing 4 місяці тому

    Well I totally agree with you / I bought Kaisi 350S which I faced the same concern but I used to it and it is lot cheaper than AMtech and better than RF4.
    It is what it is man

  • @user-se2pb5yx5p
    @user-se2pb5yx5p 4 місяці тому

    I have mechanic mc75t. Very popular in India for mobile repair.
    I wonder how it will compare to more expensive ones

  • @zaytsevvaleriy
    @zaytsevvaleriy 4 місяці тому +3

    looks like you got some faulty microscope. Try to test this unit with a coin. Place the coin so that it is completely within the sight of one eyepiece. Then look through another eyepiece and compare the area of the coin that is visible. There shouldn't be much difference, ideally the area occupied by the coin in the field of view should be identical for both eyepieces. If the difference is noticeable, then the optical axes are out of alignment and the microscope requires adjustment.

    • @northwestrepair
      @northwestrepair  4 місяці тому

      Each eye is adjustable independently.
      The problem is not adjustment of the eye pieces focus but the angle at which you are looking through it.

    • @worroSfOretsevraH
      @worroSfOretsevraH 4 місяці тому

      Maybe it got hit during shipping and some prizm moved out of place inside.
      Or bad alignment from factory...

    • @zaytsevvaleriy
      @zaytsevvaleriy 4 місяці тому

      ​@@northwestrepair you didn't understand what I said. forget about focusing. Check the field of view of both eyepieces with coin.

  • @sqrl1980
    @sqrl1980 4 місяці тому

    did you buy em at Northridgefix ? ;3

  • @RcFixer
    @RcFixer 4 місяці тому

    Nice toy

  • @alanpang8223
    @alanpang8223 4 місяці тому

    The double vision might not be the same for everyone. It sounds like the microscope has prismatic issues (or the user has poor accommodation/vergence flexibility). A lot of microscopes are set up for optical, infinity viewing but most people (especially young people) will naturally try to converge their eyes for a perceived close target. A bit like magic eye puzzles: some people can easily dissociate their convergence/accommodation, others can't...

  • @computersrepaircotesaint-l7407
    @computersrepaircotesaint-l7407 4 місяці тому

    you just saved me 200 cdn. I have the same eakins as yours and my problem for is when putting the 0.5 lens its way to high for me to work, Thought this one will give me 2 centimeters less in Hight

  • @andrikurniawan531
    @andrikurniawan531 4 місяці тому

    i use rf4 blower, pretty good and cheap, but for microscope buy from company that fokus at making microscope or other lens related product

  • @skipdog77
    @skipdog77 4 місяці тому +25

    Bro why waste time on these when you can pickup the sweetest of them all! The NorthridgeFix Microscope! Have you heard? They are in stock and ready to ship today! If your order comes in this morning it will likely go out today! 🤣

    • @shiftctrlhack
      @shiftctrlhack 4 місяці тому +1

      My Guy!!! I was going to post something like this!!!!

    • @TheCerovec
      @TheCerovec 4 місяці тому +2

      Exactly,I just bought a second one,and I don't even do electronics repair

    • @DM16_
      @DM16_ 4 місяці тому +6

      I bought the northbridge fix ring light and now I live a glare free life

    • @cili0ne
      @cili0ne 4 місяці тому

      @@DM16_Northfridge fix anti-glare light so good even the chinese copied it!

    • @MadEDoctor
      @MadEDoctor 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, the depth perception is for losers😂

  • @meljohnston5829
    @meljohnston5829 4 місяці тому +2

    I've just bought the rf4. It's really good. The one I have is identical to the eakins and very heavy. Maybe you have a lower standard model or a copy of a copy? :)

  • @teddp
    @teddp 4 місяці тому +1

    Just playing devil's advocate here but have you considered that it is a problem that only you could have? I mean have you put anyone else to try and see if this microscope works for their eyes?

  • @miguelfernandez2325
    @miguelfernandez2325 4 місяці тому

    Send those to Alex as a present anonymously. LMAO

  • @LilMissMurder3409
    @LilMissMurder3409 4 місяці тому

    May ee chai naaah

  • @SebastiaanSwinkels
    @SebastiaanSwinkels 4 місяці тому

    I'd recommend a Mantis, but those have no tri heads afaik.

  • @XPbIM3
    @XPbIM3 4 місяці тому

    Those two are so called "stereo optical microscopes" they are intended to provide a stereoscopic and slightly magnified picture.
    Not all of the microscopes are stereoscopic, but for microelectronics rebuild works stereoscopic ones are commonly used.
    There are basically two common optical schemas for building stereo microscope : the Grinu and the Abbe. They are different in manner how they organise optical flow. The one where optical channels are inclied - seems to be Grinu, the second one seems to be Abbe.
    Abbe microscopes sometimes perfomrs better, especcially with trinocular and digital camera attached.
    The propoblems You are desribing with bad parallax could be just the cause of this particular microscope is poorly made...

  • @matthewrobinson150
    @matthewrobinson150 4 місяці тому

    hey bro rf 4 is a copy of soptop szn71 , which im assuming they failed hard at ... if you want best microscope of Chinese one buy soptop szn71 . expensive buy worth the price can do iphone cpu jumpers etc

  • @RicardoSiul
    @RicardoSiul 4 місяці тому

    The double vision has nothing to do with the angle of the eyepieces. The problem is with the lenses at the bottom that needs adjustment.

    • @northwestrepair
      @northwestrepair  4 місяці тому +1

      So it comes like that from the factory ?
      Either way, the angle of the eye pieces is terrible. It does not line up with my eyes and rubber padding is all at the wrong angle.
      On the other hand, they have technicians with cross vision adjusting these lol 😂😂

    • @Djazeiry
      @Djazeiry 4 місяці тому

      @@northwestrepair lol nice one 😆😆

  • @kentstansberry9748
    @kentstansberry9748 4 місяці тому

    Designed by a DEI hire? I hope you sent it back with a note.

  • @MichaelGiacomelli
    @MichaelGiacomelli 4 місяці тому

    I bought an RF4 recently and they shipped it in an unpadded box with almost nothing to protect it all the way from China. When I opened it the mirrors were completely loose and badly cracked in the bottom of the package and the head was broken almost in half. The gearing was also screwed up. I took it apart, realigned it and then glued the mirrors back into place and while it was a gigantic pain in the ass, it does now actually work pretty well. Compared to my Amscope trinocular head the eye piece quality isn't obviously different (or at least I didn't notice anything obvious worse), although the build quality is much cheaper/fragile. I do not see the same problems you mention (at least now that I've rebuilt it), so I think yours might have been only less damaged than mine and something inside is out of alignment. If you want to open it up, you might be able to fix it.
    That said, from my point of view packaging it like they did was just crazy. It is a microscope, and one made of plastic no less. They need to charge a few dollars more and package it in a way that it'll survive shipping.

  • @giginet4625
    @giginet4625 4 місяці тому +1

    I hate using these type of microscope,for me works direct hdmi lenses conected to monitor,i can sit normaly and watch the monitor completly free,at the beginning its a little 😊😊😊hard but with time you get used to it

    • @fabian11235
      @fabian11235 4 місяці тому +1

      Thinking about switching too. The depth perception is so nice though. But feeling like I am Quasimodo after two hours is not.

  • @ar11999
    @ar11999 4 місяці тому

    we should instead call nvidia to get you some extra robo arms so you can repair more GPU's

  • @Unsocial200
    @Unsocial200 4 місяці тому +1

    That's what you get for not buying NF microscope combined with NF Anti-glare light. 🤣🤣

  • @defeusers
    @defeusers 4 місяці тому

    just bough rf4 6565pro and its not feel like ur review

  • @sairus6055
    @sairus6055 4 місяці тому +1

    If you have double image probably microscope need adjusting (maybe it was bushet at shipping). I have AmScope 7X-45X Simul-Focal small focus lost appear on ends of zooming range (it usual case for low price microscopes).

  • @Ncky
    @Ncky 4 місяці тому

    Is it free to join your discord server?

    • @northwestrepair
      @northwestrepair  4 місяці тому

      Yes

    • @Ncky
      @Ncky 4 місяці тому

      can you update the link because link on your channel has expired

    • @northwestrepair
      @northwestrepair  4 місяці тому

      @@Ncky you are getting the link in the wrong place.
      Use channel front page.
      It's not expired.

    • @Ncky
      @Ncky 4 місяці тому

      @@northwestrepair krzHbYpUMy, weird, i kept getting invite invalid last night. Alright was bug on my side, thanks anyway.

  • @dominicm2175
    @dominicm2175 4 місяці тому +1

    Trinocular ?? Do a lot of repair techs have 3 eyes 🤣

  • @enteranon3342
    @enteranon3342 4 місяці тому +1

    Vevor Microscope is cheaper and better

  • @Irilia_neko
    @Irilia_neko 4 місяці тому +2

    Who has designed this trash