Max Weber Bureaucracy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 247

  • @orgcomm
    @orgcomm  2 роки тому +8

    Free PDF download of the 5 Essential Communication Skills for Professionals: bit.ly/2K9Gile-QuickGuide

  • @Sara-nq1lp
    @Sara-nq1lp 4 роки тому +65

    I watched my professor's prerecorded lecture about bureacucracy FOUR times and still could barely get any info out of it. This video saved my life. So clear and straight up. Thanks!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому +9

      I'm glad the video was helpful, Sara. Thank you for the encouragement.

  • @gabididu7516
    @gabididu7516 6 років тому +104

    ‘Vey-ber’ is the correct way to say this as he is German. However most of Europe wouldn’t pronounce their W’s as V’s as this is specific to the German language/accent.

    • @alexanderlyon
      @alexanderlyon 6 років тому +3

      I've heard many people say what you've said but I've heard just as many educated people in the US say that it is acceptable to use the B sound in the US (even though many people in the US still say it V). Case in point, Germans pronounce the W in Volkswagen with a V sound but in the US we pronounce it B even though it is a German name. Weber is a very common name in the US. It clearly has German origins but we say it with the B sound 100% of the time when it is an American. All that to say, V is the correct, traditional way to say it but B is an acceptable pronunciation in the US. And, believe me, I looked into it for a long time before I said it. For many words, two pronunciations can both be correct even though one is preferred. Anyway, thanks for the comment. I'm sure people will be debating this for a long time in academia. I wish Weber was here to tell us. :-)

    • @sanjaybhowmick8386
      @sanjaybhowmick8386 4 роки тому +2

      He never asked a German!

    • @Borrelaas
      @Borrelaas 9 місяців тому +1

      I would not pronounce it with a Y myself, but maybe i pronounce it wrong

    • @Maisel9
      @Maisel9 5 місяців тому

      It's "Weaber", like in "wealth" or "weary", long vocal. Or like "web" but the e is long.

    • @theslimecrew4827
      @theslimecrew4827 2 місяці тому

      Now pronounce it in German.​@@Maisel9

  • @kimneinemchongloi2016
    @kimneinemchongloi2016 6 років тому +53

    I had problem with this topic in the class but this video clarified everything, really helpful. Thanks Alex from India.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому +9

      Your welcome from New York State (the part of the state with the Finger Lakes and Niagara Falls).

    • @ravin2363
      @ravin2363 6 років тому

      kimneinem chongloi hey prasad and prasad is a good book if you are interested in reading about Administrative thinkers and theories. Fellow Indian. ☺️

    • @kimneinemchongloi2016
      @kimneinemchongloi2016 6 років тому

      @@ravin2363 o thank u for the recommendation I will gladly do so👍

    • @ashishpanwar909
      @ashishpanwar909 5 років тому

      Preparing for UPSC CSE?

  • @divinitytarot6
    @divinitytarot6 5 років тому +11

    Sir , you have made a great contribution by explanation of steps and made it simplified, Thanks

  • @Ralph-vx1qo
    @Ralph-vx1qo 2 роки тому +1

    I had been attentively listening to my professor for 3 hours and I still didn't understand it. Having watched this video for 10 mins, I finally understand the theory. Thanks!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 роки тому

      Glad it helped!

  • @kk-op8qr
    @kk-op8qr 4 роки тому +7

    Well Done Sir, your points are what is needed to as a perfect start for Weberian Administration Theory.

  • @itz_dee8994
    @itz_dee8994 2 роки тому +9

    Why did my professor make this seem hard 😭. This helped too much 💜

  • @himanshukautkar2075
    @himanshukautkar2075 4 роки тому +1

    I can study here with same enthusiasm as I complete Web Series or a movie.
    Each video I am watching is Best.
    Thanks for all time and efforts for making such amazing content and great explanation...!!!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому +1

      So nice of you! Glad the videos are helpful.

  • @jessicafadel5196
    @jessicafadel5196 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you so much, I am doing online studies and I feel like you are my professor. I really appreciate your videos to better understand key concepts!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Happy the videos are helpful, Jessica. Good luck in your studies.

  • @ugoa.k.atbonenwaogazi591
    @ugoa.k.atbonenwaogazi591 4 роки тому +4

    My curiosity is elevated with this piece of informed explanation

    • @collaborativelearning1
      @collaborativelearning1 Рік тому

      Thanks I want to get this book. I read Bureaucracy by James Wilson which is more contemporary book that does source this one.

  • @mainnel.9901
    @mainnel.9901 3 роки тому +8

    This is so well explained, I'm so enlightened. Thanks, man.

  • @linguaphile1871
    @linguaphile1871 10 місяців тому

    English is not my first language but this was simplified and I could understand most of it, thank you!

  • @nancymiriam904
    @nancymiriam904 6 років тому +5

    Thank you thank you thank you.... i don't have to hide in some corner to read to understand all the long age management theories..just need an hour maximum two to understand your explanations. God bless you.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому +1

      Hi, Nancy. I'm glad it was helpful. God bless you, too!

  • @rachelsombo9045
    @rachelsombo9045 6 років тому +4

    I have an exam next week , Thank you so much 😊 from France 🇫🇷

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      Happy to help, Rachel, from New York state!

  • @guzmanxp4906
    @guzmanxp4906 4 роки тому +6

    Hi, this video was amazing. Thank you so much! I tried reading "Working in America" By Amy Wharton, and she just confuses everything with her complex language. Thankfully, you went straight to the point and things really make sense.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому +1

      I'm glad the video was helpful, Guzman. Thanks for your encouragement.

  • @ariellepoudel4895
    @ariellepoudel4895 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this! I was reading Characteristics of Bureaucracy by Max Weber and was getting so confused

  • @madhavimukkala5030
    @madhavimukkala5030 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you soo much this will help me in tomorrow s test. Your explanation is amazing and yet understandable and simple.

  • @bayan6325
    @bayan6325 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for your amazing videos,getting sleepy reading theories but your videos made my day.

  • @积木先生
    @积木先生 3 роки тому

    Though i watched these video which uploaded 5 years ago , it is still really useful to me.

  • @rogercloud9219
    @rogercloud9219 6 років тому +1

    Max Weber I appreciate your work...

  • @rakshithbhaskara2016
    @rakshithbhaskara2016 6 років тому +1

    Hello sir Alex , This channel is so helpful in doing my MBA, iam so thankful with your work

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      I'm glad the videos are helpful. :-) Thank you for the encouragement.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      I'm glad the videos are helpful. :-) Thank you for the encouragement.

  • @phumlamthembu5511
    @phumlamthembu5511 6 років тому +2

    excellent explanations. will definitely be watching the rest of the videos

  • @inakastories23
    @inakastories23 5 років тому +3

    thank you very much. Your video assisted me a lot. From PNG (South Pacific).

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      Hello from New York!

  • @priyaverma7113
    @priyaverma7113 5 років тому +4

    Best explanation.. I got help for my presentation.❤️

  • @CandyFlower99
    @CandyFlower99 5 років тому +2

    It helped a lot, thank you sir. Wish you best... from Turkey

  • @TheAlexWoodOff
    @TheAlexWoodOff 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your lecture from St. Petersburg, Russia (North-West Institute of Management of THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENTIAL ACADEMY OF NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION)

  • @sabihamahmood1585
    @sabihamahmood1585 6 років тому +2

    This video really helped me clear my concepts on this topic..! Great Job, well done..😊

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      Hi, Sabiha. I'm glad the video helped you.

  • @akanksharoy7047
    @akanksharoy7047 6 років тому +3

    Just love your work....keep going ...be blessed

  • @mwambechansa8815
    @mwambechansa8815 4 роки тому

    This has been so clear. Thanks. I now understand. What this theory is I can answer any questions concerning the theory thanks again

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @naturee7796
    @naturee7796 5 років тому +1

    Thank you sooo much....it really helped me a lot...I couldn't really understand the topic before but after watching this video its clarified ...Thank You😊..Thanks a lot

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      Happy to help!

  • @robertciolek798
    @robertciolek798 6 років тому +2

    Buddy, can you make a quantity surveying video based on take off sheets and how to understand substructure & superstructure and how the figures work ? Would be GREATLY appreciated.
    All the best man !!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому +1

      Glad you like the channel, Robert. I don't know anything about those topics, though. Wish I did. Sorry about that. My background is in communication in the workplace.

    • @robertciolek798
      @robertciolek798 6 років тому

      Organizational Communication Channel no worries you helped me out so much anyway as your videos really make it clear and easy to understand rather than reading lots of hand outs given in college, I just thought I'd change my arm as I'm really in a bit of bother in that area!!

  • @antov1061
    @antov1061 2 роки тому

    Thank you for answering my exam question in sociology 👍

  • @franzii1068
    @franzii1068 5 років тому +4

    I‘m from Germany and one of my best friends last name is Weber. We don‘t pronounce it like Vey-ber. We pronounce it like Ve-ber, so without the y.

    • @estheridza9577
      @estheridza9577 5 років тому

      Thank you Alex for your clear breakdown of Max Weber's theory

  • @lessonin30sseconds68
    @lessonin30sseconds68 3 роки тому +1

    Me too alex...lot of loves from india brother..

  • @ubison
    @ubison Рік тому

    Very easy to understand and helpful.

  • @tishabarlow5269
    @tishabarlow5269 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video- was super helpful to prepare for my test on Weber :)

  • @abhaygautamoo7577
    @abhaygautamoo7577 6 років тому +2

    Thankyou for this amazing video sir, keep up the good work❗️

  • @sebenzilepdlamini9384
    @sebenzilepdlamini9384 7 місяців тому

    Thank you so much well explained ,and clear...

  • @aryanbatra7217
    @aryanbatra7217 5 років тому +2

    thank you from India.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      Hello from NY state.

  • @mouhamedkandji208
    @mouhamedkandji208 11 місяців тому

    i have just seen what i was looking for. thanks you

  • @ganeshvasa249
    @ganeshvasa249 6 років тому +1

    thanks it made my work very easy and the explanation was very good

  • @amanmeena2878
    @amanmeena2878 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir. I highly appreciate your efforts.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому +2

      It's my pleasure. Thank you!

  • @iftikharhusain6286
    @iftikharhusain6286 3 роки тому +1

    Respect to You from Pakistan

  • @patrickj.sobkowski2341
    @patrickj.sobkowski2341 Рік тому

    Excellent explanation video.

  • @robertciolek798
    @robertciolek798 6 років тому +28

    I'm polish and trust me it's veber 😅

    • @alexanderlyon
      @alexanderlyon 6 років тому

      Do you live in Poland?

    • @robertciolek798
      @robertciolek798 6 років тому

      No man live in Ireland for the last 10 years, iam currently 18 so you can do the math 😉 but my god I fully consider myself polish even though my accent might not suggest so 😅

    • @alexanderlyon
      @alexanderlyon 6 років тому +1

      I'm 1/2 Polish but really just American except for some really great Polish food and awesome relatives growing up. BTW, I'm switching between my two UA-cam channel accounts as I post. I replied about not knowing about a topic you requested in your other post. I do the Organizational Communication Channel and the one I'm posting under now, Communication Coach. I hope to visit Ireland someday. It's aways intrigued me. Thanks for posting.

    • @johnsuperhist5219
      @johnsuperhist5219 2 роки тому

      @@robertciolek798 conas a tá tú

  • @gabrielserrano5494
    @gabrielserrano5494 7 місяців тому

    Thanks for the video. Which book can I read to understand the basic notions of administration?"

  • @tygarspace1754
    @tygarspace1754 3 роки тому +1

    Volkswagen is pronounced more like Folksvagen. Great video! Thanks

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Thanks, Tygar.

  • @johnfollet123
    @johnfollet123 7 років тому +3

    Hi, How does Weber’s theory of bureaucracy and its relevance to Public Sector Management?

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  7 років тому +1

      Hi John. It depends on what types of mean by public sector but I'll do my best to answer. Most large organizations in the public sector still run today in a bureaucratic fashion. The public sector mirrors and extends the legal-rational system of government. In that way, they are managed very similar to traditional government organizations. Having said that, my area of expertise is organizational communication and does not focus much on the public sector. I look more so at private organizations. Not sure this answers your question but that's what I've got for you.

    • @johnfollet123
      @johnfollet123 7 років тому +1

      Thanks it helps a lot.

  • @sabirhussain-lr7cs
    @sabirhussain-lr7cs 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir... Much respect from Pakistan

  • @bikashkushwaha4536
    @bikashkushwaha4536 2 роки тому

    Well explaination
    From nepal🇳🇵

  • @beniciawillemse3344
    @beniciawillemse3344 5 років тому +1

    Love this UA-cam video. Thank u so much.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      You're welcome! Glad it helped.

  • @Empress033
    @Empress033 2 роки тому

    Thank you...what are the examples of a beauricratic social movement???

  • @arikivol196
    @arikivol196 7 років тому +1

    Hi Alex,
    You are a fantastic communicator. Thank you for the videos you have made.
    Bri

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  7 років тому

      Thank you for the encouragement, Bri. I appreciate it. More videos on the way.

  • @Ajbear263
    @Ajbear263 6 років тому +1

    Thank you for this video, very helpful!

  • @ubison
    @ubison Рік тому

    In Utah, we have a county called Weber. Here it's pronounced Wee-ber. Weh-ber is more likely to be spelled with a double b, Webber. The German of Weber pronunciation would be more like Vay-bǝ.

  • @SK-le1gm
    @SK-le1gm 4 роки тому +2

    Where there’s a will, there’s a Weber.

  • @yawleenaraut4663
    @yawleenaraut4663 3 роки тому

    This video is really helpful. Thank you😊

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @dulomdampu2902
    @dulomdampu2902 6 років тому +1

    thank you sir..keep up the good work and you will soon have million subscribers...

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      Thank you, Dulom. I appreciate your encouragement. :-)

  • @eniyaphiri1094
    @eniyaphiri1094 3 роки тому

    This video is very helpful😊 thank you so much

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @raziyababayeva
    @raziyababayeva 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much! Great videos! Help a lot!

  • @ytaccountchannel
    @ytaccountchannel Рік тому

    Helpful video thank you

  • @lolososo6760
    @lolososo6760 2 роки тому

    Are there videos on quantitative , behavioral, contemporary approach?

  • @suindude8149
    @suindude8149 Рік тому

    Productivity means to some extent extended to anyone while comes under industrialization of handucrafts.

  • @CarsonNiepper7118
    @CarsonNiepper7118 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much for great videos!!!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Glad you like them!

  • @bbbbbbbbbb0
    @bbbbbbbbbb0 5 років тому

    Rationalisation isn't something that Weber was necessarily against, but it certaintly isn't something that he wanted. He warned us about modernity and rational capitalism.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      I think I agree with you. From my reading, he preferred a legal-rational approach over traditional/family authority and charismatic authority. He knew the shortcomings of bureaucracy but thought it was the best of the alternatives.

  • @LuceEvan
    @LuceEvan 5 років тому +7

    Amazing video! For the pronounciation of "Volkswagen", try to say it like "Folksvaagen", then you're in German again ^^

  • @benjamincustodio5082
    @benjamincustodio5082 3 роки тому

    Amazing Video. Thank you

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 роки тому

      Glad you liked it!

  • @IanPaulSaligumba
    @IanPaulSaligumba 4 роки тому

    Your videos are awesome 😮😍 Just started our class about Administrative Theories and this is very helpful.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому +1

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @voiceofsociology2480
    @voiceofsociology2480 3 роки тому +1

    Great work

  • @metalwafe5774
    @metalwafe5774 5 років тому +19

    In the part of Germany i live we would Pronounce it like Weber so the US Version

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому +1

      Thanks for the information. I appreciate it.

    • @hortshack
      @hortshack 3 роки тому +7

      It's actually more like Veh-ber.

    • @uberchicken93
      @uberchicken93 3 роки тому

      @@hortshack Yeah, I was vehemently taught by an amazing (American) professor that it is pronounce Vay-ber, as that would be how Weber himself pronounced it.

  • @oliverlomax3821
    @oliverlomax3821 7 років тому +2

    HI, I am just wondering what book is best to read and reference for an essay in relation to Weber's idea of particularism. Many thanks.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  7 років тому

      Hi Oliver. Thanks for posting. I am no expert on particularism specifically. My understanding of it comes from regular old readings on Weber's Bureaucracy. You may want to start on Google Scholar and look up specific articles on that term in terms of drilling down. Good luck.

  • @chinenyenwaobirieze6089
    @chinenyenwaobirieze6089 2 роки тому

    very very helpful . thank you

  • @RiyaSharma-wi2ho
    @RiyaSharma-wi2ho Рік тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH. SO HELPFUL

  • @jnambaya1
    @jnambaya1 6 років тому

    well explained, great job.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      Thank you, Jonas. I'm glad it helped.

    • @lucksonsimumba4595
      @lucksonsimumba4595 6 років тому

      Jonas Nambaya it is a great video

  • @GospelinAI
    @GospelinAI 8 років тому

    thanks for posting. very helpful

  • @jenik5529
    @jenik5529 7 років тому +4

    Awesome thank you

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  7 років тому

      Thanks again, Neelam. :-)

  • @dickysandy3963
    @dickysandy3963 Рік тому

    appreciate it when u mention how to pronounce Weber.

  • @LiveStarProductions
    @LiveStarProductions 7 років тому +1

    This helped a lot! You are great :D

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  7 років тому

      Hi, Live Star Productions. Thank you for the encouragement!

  • @amarmahmoud841
    @amarmahmoud841 4 роки тому

    Hi , thanks a lot for this video it really helped me along with F Taylor scientific management. One questions i have been trying to get around is if you think the scientific and classic management theory as explained do you think its not relevant for todays managers?

    • @amarmahmoud841
      @amarmahmoud841 4 роки тому

      One main i feel is the structure of how these new organisations run such as google thrive of initiative ideas and social interaction , something which personally i feel scientific and classical management don’t offer.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому

      Scientific management is still used today, more than ever really. It's used in most production-based organization, food, etc. However, knowledge-driven organizations like Google are not in the business of producing tangible products. So, it does not fit that situation as much.

  • @tezachellah5349
    @tezachellah5349 5 років тому

    How can I cite this? Very helpful.👍🏻🇿🇲

  • @wijuboungonamai6905
    @wijuboungonamai6905 2 роки тому

    hello sir, can you also please explain Verstehen and causal pluralism

  • @lululavi7547
    @lululavi7547 5 років тому +3

    If Weber acknowledges the 'iron cage' of bureaucracy, isn't he criticising his own management theory?

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому +2

      Yes, exactly. He thought bureaucracy was better than the alternatives but he saw its limitations.

    • @RahulMeena-zj3tt
      @RahulMeena-zj3tt 5 років тому

      Lulu Lavi He thought bureaucracy is the most efficient but rationality kills liberty

    • @BangThaBazie
      @BangThaBazie 4 роки тому

      The iron cage started out more broadly than just with bureaucracy, he tried to describe how rationalization of our personal and societal lives informs and guides our actions. Bureaucracies are a manifest form of that.
      The German phrase he used that became "iron cage" was "stahlhartes Gehäuse der Hörigkeit" which directly translates to "steel hardened case of obedience".
      The obedience to rationality, objectivity, order, efficiency that over time manifests in systems, institutions even customs.
      Weber ended his 1904 work "The protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism" in an almost, in hindsight, ironic way by saying that this economic order of industrial production exerts such an overwhelming pressure("überwältigender Zwang") on everyone to abide by its logic and rule and that it will do so until the last ton of fossil fuel is burned up. ("bis der letzte Zenter fossilen Brennstoffs verglüht ist.")
      Weber analyzed industrialization and early capitalism and described the way it functions, but he was also critical about the implications it might have to let economic rationality and considerations of efficiency have such a massive influence on the way humans live. A perspective that may have been lost to the fact that forthcoming generations didn't ever get to know any other way.
      I always liked this quote, although I don't know if it translates as well:
      ‚Fachmenschen ohne Geist, Genussmenschen ohne Herz: dies Nichts bildet sich ein, eine nie vorher erreichte Stufe des Menschentums erstiegen zu haben.‘
      "Professionals without spirit, connoisseurs without heart: This nothing imagines to have climbed to a never before reached level of humanity."
      In other words he feared efficiency for efficiency's sake.
      To me, Weber's work has been the best answer to the question of why we can't seem to do anything about climate change.
      The rationalities we follow and the systems we built around them aren't prepared for a scenario like this. And the power structures that formed as a result of this economic system prevent necessary change and reform. That's the iron cage.
      For over a century we followed the logic of growth, only to find out that we forgot to take a look at the logic of sustainability.
      But hey, we still got to call what we did "rational".

  • @cameronfields5670
    @cameronfields5670 6 років тому +1

    Huge. Thank you.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  6 років тому

      You're welcome, Cameron. I'm glad it helps.

  • @ebrarduyan1050
    @ebrarduyan1050 4 роки тому

    Really good video.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому

      Glad you enjoyed it.

  • @lalaland7381
    @lalaland7381 8 місяців тому

    someone please tell me the exact definition of bureaucracy by Weber himself

  • @hybrid351ss
    @hybrid351ss 5 років тому +4

    Hilarious that most people took the pronunciation of Weber is the main subject of the video

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому +2

      Agreed! I put it in there because it's a minor debate but really NOT supposed to be the subject of the video. But, what can you do? At least people are watching. :-)

  • @erickodera5206
    @erickodera5206 3 роки тому

    It is Veber, since hes German. French names are also termed as they should

  • @xeeclassic
    @xeeclassic 6 років тому

    thanks..its really nice vedio..

  • @muhammadaimanbinali4051
    @muhammadaimanbinali4051 4 роки тому

    Can someone help me at 8:15 what does people still take advantage means?

  • @designermakes6100
    @designermakes6100 5 років тому

    how can APA 6, reference this video and Bureaucracy and your video about Taylorism!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому +1

      I do not recommend using citing this video as a source. It would be better to use a journal article about Weber and Taylor. This video is just like a teacher's lecture on the topic and we don't typically cite teachers' lectures as a source.

    • @designermakes6100
      @designermakes6100 5 років тому

      Organizational Communication Channel thank you!! I won’t breach Plagiarism will I though?

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому

      @@designermakes6100 You should speak with your teacher about it.

  • @etiennepoeder7859
    @etiennepoeder7859 4 роки тому

    @0.40: It's trying out a german name as if it were an american name is almost never a good idea.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  4 роки тому

      I'm just reporting what I've been told and researched. I'm not claiming to know myself. Apparently, even in certain parts of Germany, they pronounce it with the W sound. So, the reality is, people pronounce this differently, strictly speaking, neither are incorrect even if "Vey" is preferred. But, people sure do feel strongly about it.

  • @EricaClark-n1m
    @EricaClark-n1m Рік тому

    How do you cite this in APA

  • @renajeanmalumbaga919
    @renajeanmalumbaga919 2 роки тому

    Can i have the PowerPoint of this

  • @oneminuteerik584
    @oneminuteerik584 10 місяців тому

    It’s "V" eeber. Thank you.

  • @harrythefrog1732
    @harrythefrog1732 6 років тому

    Thank you so much

  • @ryanweaver9155
    @ryanweaver9155 5 років тому

    not sure if you will see this but what type of theorist was Weber? I was thinking he fell under the lines of a functionalist

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  5 років тому +1

      Agreed. Most of the classical organizational studies crowd were functionalists.

    • @ryanweaver9155
      @ryanweaver9155 5 років тому

      Organizational Communication Channel thank you

  • @gyanprakashraj4062
    @gyanprakashraj4062 Рік тому

    CHAMPION OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY..😁😁😁😁

  • @kimyildiz3743
    @kimyildiz3743 4 роки тому

    Great video greeting from Sweeden

  • @sdittloff
    @sdittloff 4 роки тому

    It is definitely Vey - ber!