User Review: Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

www.amazon.com... - Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
www.amazon.com...
Camera Lenses - camera lenses explained for beginners.
hit play for some camera lens tips and advice!.. ı shoot canon so ı am using canon lenses as an example for this video because ı know them the best.
the basics of camera lenses explained tips on how to choose a lens for video and examples of what different focal lengths look like! discover the world's most in-depth digital camera reviews at .
what lens should you buy?! how lenses function.
how to remove fungus from a camera lens fast & easy. the best lenses for portraits.
the holy trınıty of lenses. 3 lenses every photographer needs & why!
ıt’s a reliable option for purchasing and selling your used camera gear. how camera lenses are made.
ı want to help you understand the different types of lenses there are so you are more knowledgable when it's time to make that big purchase. one of the most important aspects of photography are lenses. finding the right lens is hard. ın this camera lenses explained video sean cannell from think media tv shares tips on how to choose a lens for video. vıdeo - top 3 cheap canon lenses for youtube ... so what lens should you buy? fujıfılm factory visit - how lenses & cameras are made.
there's a right way and a wrong way to clean a camera lens.
today we talk about the 3 lenses every photographer needs to own & why!.
camera lenses 101 - everything you need to know in 10 minutes.
ın my own collection ı have a sigma 35mm art but for sake of consistency ı taught using only canon lenses instead of a mix of brands...
what lens shall ı buy?
Im trying really really hard to love this lens but I think I can only like it a lot. Whats good? - Its a GREAT looking lens. - Comes with a petal hood.
Very solidly built. - Has a very decent zoom range. - Makes a very good walk around lens. - Very decent price. Whats not so good? - The images that come from this lens are a bit soft at the high end of the zoom range.
Ok...maybe a lot soft. - Okaaaaaaay...a little blurry.
Okay...maybe JUST blurry but maybe its the cheap UV filter I put on it, but it didnt really seem to improve much when I took it of, so maybe I shook, or heat and humidity between myself and the target blurred things a little?
Maybe? See how much I try to like this lens? Am I happy with it? Yeah, I guess. Would I buy this same lens again? Probably not. The Sigma 70-300 (140 bucks) was MUCH sharper at 200mm than this lens.
For 100 bucks more you can get the Sigma 18-200mm which is a great range, but Id still be leery given my experience with this lens. Im sorry Sigma, Ive TRIED to love you!
But we can still be friends.
Heavy. So what, spend more and buy a new one. Similar
This lense was just as described.. It was in great shape and works perfectly.. Thank you..
compared to: - Minolta 75-300mm - Sigma 10mm-20mm zoom - Minolta 28-100mm - Minolta 100-200mm - Sigma 105mm macro positive: - light 14 oz.
macro increases flexibility - solid build - well-damped zoom control - nice looking petal hood - sharper than expected at zoom extremes - very sharp stopped down just one EV (f/5 on wide end) - zoom lock - price/value negative: - zoom ring over damped at middle of zoom range - autofocus a little slow - slight barrel distortion at wide end.
comment: This is now my standard "take anywhere" lens. Its light, has reasonably responsive auto-focus, and was surprisingly sharp. It feels well-made and solid, and looks great with the petal hood.
I really like the versatility, and the fact that you can get close and get a pretty sharp macro at 100-200mm I have gotten it to auto-focus as close as 14 inches (350mm) at wide angle, which is closer than specifications.
It hunts for focus some in lower light. In my test-card shots on an Alpha 700, it was as sharp as my 105mm Sigma macro in parts of the range. At the long end, it has some color fringing.
Another "defect" was some barrel distortion between 28-40mm. This was only noticeable when taking shots of rectangular objects that fill most of the frame.
It is still available new, but its no longer in the Sigma lineup, If you get a chance, pick one up. There is a good review here: [...]
Click Link In Description For More Reviews.
Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5...