My favorite evidence for God is science. Because to do science you have to believe that the world is understandable. That there is such a thing as truth. That to seek truth is good. And that our minds are able to understand evidence and reason our way to the truth. None of which we could do in a universe comprised of nothing more than mindless matter. Yet we do have science, and we do know it works. Science itself is compelling evidence of God. (Could say the same for mathematics, it's just a whole lot easier to see with science.)
Thank you. I’ve been working on hearing from God and getting frustrated that I’m likely being more superstitious or delusional. This talk just taught me that God is the one who makes sense out of nonsense. The difference between genius and stupid is outcome. So I’ll keep studying the word and paying attention to the nonsense I pick up, God in me will make sense of it. Thank you so much🙂
I had posted a video of Mar Mari giving facts about human creation and one of my atheist friends commented. In replying to him, I get a notification for this video. Thank you for your brilliant content Dr. Wallace.
I think it is GREAT that science leaves out the "who." It forces everyone to completely exhaust all other possibilities. If we had the "who" in there and kept going to a conclusion about a "who," there would remain in the minds of many another possible alternate. Without the "who," we are forced to concede there cannot be anything else BUT a Who.
The next time I write an essay on evolution, I'm going to record many letter characters in complete disorder and insist that the paper is marked only once the passage of time has allowed the letters to reorganize themselves into the most impressive essay ever!
Code requires a coder. The fine-tuning witnessed in both the inorganic and the organic is due to necessity, chance, or design. Neither necessity nor chance have ontological status; therefore, no ability to cause anything. The belief in a rational creator lead to the development of science. The developments of science lead us back to belief in a rational creator.
Life could never begin as self-replicating molecules. Life on Earth requires vast systems of chemical pathways which cooperate together to use chemical or light energy to create more molecules which ultimately permit self-replucation pf the whole shebang.
My favorite evidence too. The more we discover about molecular structures and interactive systems in cells the tougher it gets to try to explain away Intelligent Design. From there the debate question is "What intelligence was around when the first cells appeared on the early earth?". Similar paradoxes and questions arise when considering how to get multicellular lifeforms and their novel body parts and interdependent systems designed and working simultaneously. Evolutionary theorists come up with amusing could-be, maybe, possibly, perhaps, just-so stories. None of which are demonstrated or observed. The best they do is appeal to adaptive variations we see on the micro scale and try to say that over time the minor changes accumulate towards macro changes. One of the problems there is that the code only allows for a limited change. A second problem is that with each novel body part there must be much new DNA information for the multiple parts of the new part, a new set of protein machines, new ribosomes, new transport pathways, new location markers, timing and growth regulators and more. Good luck explain that by natural processes. What we've discovered is what we would predict from intelligent causes.
That statement by Paul Davies is a classic example of willful ignorance. It’s just like a starving man standing in the middle of a smorgasbord refusing to eat because he can’t believe what he’s seeing.
Do you know that you are on the road of destruction and God's wrath? The answer to this question is in God's Word the Holy Bible. Romans 3:9-22 explains man's condition and guilt before God. How can God's wrath against you be avoided? Romans 1:16 explains the way to be saved from God's wrath; Acts 10:34-48 explains the gospel message which is what you need to believe in order to be forgiven your sins against God because justification before God is achieved through faith as explained in Romans chapter 4. Ephesians 1:13-14, Romans 8:16 explains how God seals you and gives you the guarantee of eternal life by believing the gospel. God credits the righteousness of Jesus Christ to you so that you can stand before Him blameless and enjoy his goodness forever. However, if you reject the gospel the only thing left for you is eternal punishment in the lake of fire because you have offended a holy and righteous God.
You are suggesting a "blind faith". Even Jesus knew and demonstrated that a blind faith decision would not be enough for most people. That's what the miracles, and especially the resurrection, were for!
My favorite evidence for God is science. Because to do science you have to believe that the world is understandable. That there is such a thing as truth. That to seek truth is good. And that our minds are able to understand evidence and reason our way to the truth. None of which we could do in a universe comprised of nothing more than mindless matter. Yet we do have science, and we do know it works. Science itself is compelling evidence of God. (Could say the same for mathematics, it's just a whole lot easier to see with science.)
Thank you. I’ve been working on hearing from God and getting frustrated that I’m likely being more superstitious or delusional. This talk just taught me that God is the one who makes sense out of nonsense. The difference between genius and stupid is outcome. So I’ll keep studying the word and paying attention to the nonsense I pick up, God in me will make sense of it. Thank you so much🙂
As a microbiologist, I completely agree. 👍
I had posted a video of Mar Mari giving facts about human creation and one of my atheist friends commented. In replying to him, I get a notification for this video. Thank you for your brilliant content Dr. Wallace.
I think it is GREAT that science leaves out the "who." It forces everyone to completely exhaust all other possibilities. If we had the "who" in there and kept going to a conclusion about a "who," there would remain in the minds of many another possible alternate. Without the "who," we are forced to concede there cannot be anything else BUT a Who.
Excellent content. Praise God.
The next time I write an essay on evolution, I'm going to record many letter characters in complete disorder and insist that the paper is marked only once the passage of time has allowed the letters to reorganize themselves into the most impressive essay ever!
Brilliant 😊
😂😂 that will be an automatic fail
And you will fail spectacularly.
Thanks for sharing 🙏🏿
His grace and mercy be upon you and your loved ones 🕊️🥛🍯
Code requires a coder. The fine-tuning witnessed in both the inorganic and the organic is due to necessity, chance, or design. Neither necessity nor chance have ontological status; therefore, no ability to cause anything. The belief in a rational creator lead to the development of science. The developments of science lead us back to belief in a rational creator.
Life could never begin as self-replicating molecules.
Life on Earth requires vast systems of chemical pathways which cooperate together to use chemical or light energy to create more molecules which ultimately permit self-replucation pf the whole shebang.
Thanks for this and keep up the great work!
My favorite evidence too. The more we discover about molecular structures and interactive systems in cells the tougher it gets to try to explain away Intelligent Design.
From there the debate question is "What intelligence was around when the first cells appeared on the early earth?".
Similar paradoxes and questions arise when considering how to get multicellular lifeforms and their novel body parts and interdependent systems designed and working simultaneously.
Evolutionary theorists come up with amusing could-be, maybe, possibly, perhaps, just-so stories. None of which are demonstrated or observed. The best they do is appeal to adaptive variations we see on the micro scale and try to say that over time the minor changes accumulate towards macro changes. One of the problems there is that the code only allows for a limited change. A second problem is that with each novel body part there must be much new DNA information for the multiple parts of the new part, a new set of protein machines, new ribosomes, new transport pathways, new location markers, timing and growth regulators and more.
Good luck explain that by natural processes.
What we've discovered is what we would predict from intelligent causes.
Very well said Jim! 🏆💐👏
What came first the chicken or the egg
THE CHICKEN just like Adam!!!
Love your work!
That statement by Paul Davies is a classic example of willful ignorance.
It’s just like a starving man standing in the middle of a smorgasbord refusing to eat because he can’t believe what he’s seeing.
👍thank you .
The main question is what do you mean by the word God?
he ate 🙏
Namaste ❤
Amen 🙏
Amen 🙏 🇬🇧
Algorithm boost.
"Why" is teleological. It implies purpose and intent. It shouldn't be confused with "how." So yes, without a "who," there's no point in asking "why."
Do you know that you are on the road of destruction and God's wrath? The answer to this question is in God's Word the Holy Bible.
Romans 3:9-22 explains man's condition and guilt before God.
How can God's wrath against you be avoided? Romans 1:16 explains the way to be saved from God's wrath;
Acts 10:34-48 explains the gospel message which is what you need to believe in order to be forgiven your sins against God because justification before God is achieved through faith as explained in Romans chapter 4. Ephesians 1:13-14, Romans 8:16 explains how God seals you and gives you the guarantee of eternal life by believing the gospel. God credits the righteousness of Jesus Christ to you so that you can stand before Him blameless and enjoy his goodness forever. However, if you reject the gospel the only thing left for you is eternal punishment in the lake of fire because you have offended a holy and righteous God.
Algorithm boost
If you change the W to a T at the beginning of What, Where and When it gives you the answer 😂
Evidence - Jesus Christ is all the evidence you need. Believe in Him, and you believe in God.
What if you believe in Krishna or Buddha or Allah?
You are suggesting a "blind faith". Even Jesus knew and demonstrated that a blind faith decision would not be enough for most people. That's what the miracles, and especially the resurrection, were for!