Are you kidding? He totally owns her. Sure, the judge overrules his objections, but his constant objections severely interrupt witness accounts and I don't think the jury gets to hear a good record of what happened. My man certainly knows what he is doing! Very impressive. I bet he gets acquitted. More criminals should adopt this defense.
We don't give Lesli Boese and Zach Wittchow enough credit they too just as much deserve credit for how amazing they were during this trial and dealing with Brooks antics. I'm glad they were apart of this trial
It’s so ridiculous! It’s a sovereign citizen tactic. It’s like the judge hasn’t proven jurisdiction! If there wasn’t jurisdiction then why even bother to show up ?
@@shorty.e7804 I'm from the Burnley the north of England, we don't mince our words, we say things as they are, this scumbag is digging himself into a very deep hole 🕳 I've been following this trail since the beginning, he thinks he's clever enough to beat the system, but he's actually beating himself with every objection and every word, you know and I know he'll never get out of prison and I welcome the day of his final sentence 😘
In prison he is going to rewatch this over and over and reminisce about both the absolute unfair way he was treated, but also how brilliant and smart he thinks he is.
@@BoredBob I think 2 days ago Darrell Brooks brought up how his life has been threatened by inmates and receiving hate mail from God knows from who or from where.
He's wasting time and thinks he knows what he's doing. The judge was really upset with him yesterday, I thought she would kick him out. He's a selfish guy and I hate the witnesses have to deal with him.
@Abi Brown I think it's a good idea the attorneys and the judge refer to him as the defendant. But I derive a great deal of pleasure when a couple of the officers looked him straight in the face and called him by his name.
For someone who steadfastly agreed to represent himself in court, I would think that he would know the definition of "Hearsay" before using it constantly.
Jackson Sparks, 8;Virginia Sorenson, 79;LeAnna Owens, 71;Tamara Durand, 52;Jane Kulich, 52;and Wilhelm Hospel, 82. These were the lives lost in the attack.Many more were injured and affected for life.
I feel for whichever Jail Brooks ultimately ends up in - he will be disruptive to the tenth degree, trying the patience, on a daily basis, of the governor and staff - I bet they are having sweepstakes on who “doesn’t” get him!
That POS actually shifted it into 'L' low gear (that's why the officer heard the high RPM) to make sure he'd barrel through the bodies because in regular 'D-drive' his SUV may not have had the torque to drive through/over all those human bodies he struck. Wow, POS.
Brookes family, if there are any that still stand with him, have got to be so ashamed. Not only that he’s a murderer but his actions in court. Honestly, I wouldn’t admit to knowing this FOOL!
His mom has done interviews and you can tell her parenting style exacerbated brooks issues. She says “he did not do this intentionally” so yea she is making excuses for him.
@@moimeself1088 He probably didn’t get that messed up all his his own. From what I’ve heard so far, like you said, she’s backing up his murderous behavior. Just proves there are people in this world who should NEVER be allowed to reproduce. I’m not talking about his children as I know nothing about them. I’m sure they’re decent people as long as they haven’t been around their father too much.
It's all he knows. And that knowledge is only that the options exist. He doesn't even know that it's its the judge who should be calling for grounds, any time the defence objects they give their grounds... Uuugh..
@@rrrjjj5572 I'm sure he's going back thru every word of testimony, every word the judge speaks, & everything that occurs with LE. He desperately needs someone or something to provoke a shut down.
That was a part that I missed that he was almost gleeful as he drove through. Up until now I thought he had anger in his face or emotionless. But I guess we learn something new everyday.
I have to admit it’s humorous he just throws out objections without thoughtfully thinking or knowing why he is even objecting I truly don’t think he even understands half the phrases he spews 😂 Also the fact he has little to no knowledge of legal Lines of questioning then has the audacity in another clip to say the judge is being unfair towards him. Unreal!
"You too can become your own lawyer by watching Darrell Brook's Sovereign Citizen video by using just these 4 words to get out of anything!" Objection! Grounds! Leading! Relevance!
What's funny is that he would say "objection leading" at all the wrong times. And at at least one point in this officer's testimony, there was an actual leading question and he missed it 😂
@@naomisims7230 I saw an interview with his mom, his closest known family member, and literally (I’m not joking) she can’t be at the trial because it was her red SUV he crashed into the parade and she can’t find transportation. Again, this sounds like a bad joke but that is actually why she said she couldn’t come 🙊
It's funny he flipped the script during his trial. Watch his interrogation at the police department the same day when he was arrested at the parade. The detectives use his name, Darrell Brooks numerous times and he acknowledges that is his name.
Absolutely agree. He is disruptive, arrogant, and should NOT be allowed to subvert justice to save himself. The law MUST be changed in murder cases that the witnesses do not have to be cross-examined by their attempted murderer!
no, we do not need to stop allowing people from representing themselves because of one asshat. this is the exact type of nanny bs that leads to tyranny. control your emotions and maybe look up why we have that right in the first place before you call for its removal.
An attorney couldn't even represent him anyway. He'd yell and scream over him. No legal defense attorney is going to use a sovereign citizen argument as a reason for innocence or leniency they'd be 100% disbarred and that is the only defense Darrell Brooks would allow.
Late comment, but this foundational law won’t be changed. The judge spent about two hours explaining the benefit of counsel. Additionally, this is why we have due process: he’s assumed innocent until convicted by a jury of his peers. In legal terms, this was actually a then innocent person representing himself. The nice thing is that due to the overwhelming evidence, the judge’s saintly patience, and Mr. Brooks’ abhorrent behavior, he won’t have a chance even if he is granted an appeal.
This maniac would not know hearsay if it punched him in the mouth I bet the judge would love to have the chance Giving The witness 30 seconds would be justice
I wonder what name he signs in as to access his commissary. Or what name he gives when collecting his meals. Or what name his mother gives when calling him in prison... Does he ignore calls from his mother because she asks for Darrell Brooks?
He won't have to answer to his name in prison. He will have a number to answer to. I just thought of something that would be soooo in-his-face (although maybe not legally pertinent). Make him give a DNA sample, and compare it to his mother. Will stop all comments about him not answering to that name.
@@alanbegley7602 no, Wisconsin doesn’t have death penalty. If he had federal hate crime charges he could get capital punishment. The races would have to be reversed for that to happen though.
It's because he thinks everyone else is just pretending, because it is out of his scope to imagine people who are cleverer than him. You can't imagine something that isn't there. Dunning Kruger effect.
From @7:45 to @7:55 not a peep from Brooks at making a new object nor renewing his prior objection. Brooks is so far over his head that it’s mind boggling.
Nah, that look says, "Doesn't this guy know I don't identify as Darrell Brook's, nor have I ever gone by that name. I am a 3rd party representative representing my client! I have stated this repeatedly and therefore think this case should be dismissed!" (So that I may get behind the wheel of another vehicle and run more whoite people over.)
At 4:39 it does look like Mr. Brooks is hanging out of the window just like the police officer is testifying about. You can see movement by the window area and it looks like a white/grey shirt is leaning out. Also it bothers me so much that Mr. Brooks is constantly interrupting court proceedings. He clearly does not know what speculative and Hearsay are. He asked for more time because it is not fair for him to go through all that material. He wants to represent himself, was told what Wisconsin law is. You can not have a standby lawyer to help you out. Now he wants a standby lawyer. The judge told him she could not give him legal advice, now he wants her give him legal advice. The best, he said he never waived his right to a speedy trial and is complaining that they should have started earlier but wants more time because he doesn’t know the law and has to go through all the discoveries. You can’t have it both ways.
He can have stand-by counsel but he cannot have it from the public defenders office. Since he did not have stand-by counsel lined up when he chose to represent himself, he has no right to him?
@@alecsmith8341 I was just listening to the judge and she told him because he is representing himself, standby counsel would not be provided to him. Apparently the state of Wisconsin does not have the funds to provide standby counsel. I think Me, Brooks would have dismissed the standby counsel and then complained he didn’t have standby counsel.
@@tamarinbush6613 he had public defenders. The state public dedenders office does not provide stand-by counsel services due to lack of funding and scheduling. He is able to find lawyers to serve as stand-by counsel but the state is under no obligation to provide it and he has no right to it from the public defenders office
@@alecsmith8341 gotcha! I think I understand. You are saying he can have standby counsel if he pays for it. Correct? After watching the past 2 days he has been nothing but rude to both the judge and prosecutors. He has been loud and very menacing. She caught Mr. Brooks staring her down this last time, but he did stare her down at least once before. And I totally agree with her. I wouldn’t feel safe having him stare at me like that. He is trying his best to have the case thrown out? Get the conviction overturn on appeal if he is found guilty. It was interesting to see him lose his cool when the prosecutor said what prior bad acts they would have to bring into court if he kept questioning his ex girlfriend. Also my opinion I think his mama is trying to help him discredit his ex girlfriend. I don’t think he gets her testimony still doesn’t get him found not guilty when they have multiple witnesses who saw him driving and obviously video of him driving.
@@tamarinbush6613 so, he can have stand-by counsel if he pays out of pocket or they take it pro-bono. He is fishing for criminal contempt of court so that he can delay the trial more. Criminal contempt comes with being held in jail for a set period of time or until the party agrees to behave. The judge has said she will not do it since he is already in custody and it would allow him to profit from his misdeeds. The precedent from the case she has cited repeatedly, Illinois vs Allen, is being properly applied and he has no leg to stand on when it comes to being removed from the courtroom. As to his mother, she doesn't think he is necessarily a bad person just has mental health problems, but as to using her to impeach his baby momma, im not sure. I think he wanted to torment her more since its already proven he is abusive towards her.
His case in chief is really going to suck and probably take such a long time. I feel so badly for the families and victims, the judge, the jury, and prosecution.
He keeps saying that he is a Sovereign citizen. I've been watching and I never have heard the actual name. I bet he identified as Mathboi Fly is rap nMe lol
The name thing is this mythical loophole where because they spelled his name in all caps it doesn't count somehow. As far as I can tell he's going for the Homer Simpson defense. I didn't do it, It Wasn't Me, it was somebody else, somebody made me do it.
SovCits I think are all about contracts. They claim they've never entered into a contractual relationship with the state and since there's no contract there's no entity to prosecute. So sorta like "You're talking about some entity but that entity can't be me because I don't have a contract with you." And because there's no contract the court has no jurisdiction. Which is all nonsense.
The fact he has been allowed to act the way he has and disrespect the court is such a disgrace and slap in the face to the justice system. The Prosecutors, jurors, and CR should not have to be put through any of this. The judge deserves it since she's actually allowing it. NO ONE else would get away with treating a judge this way during a trail. WHY him?
I think there's a lot more lunacy in courts day to say than you might imagine. It's his right to act a fool and they're gonna extend him every courtesy to demonstrate they didn't interfere with his rights so the decision stands on appeal. There have been a couple times the prosecution has raised his behavior as an issue and she's told him to tone it down. They are politely escorting him to the gates of Hell.
He is one of the 'special people' and he's representing himself. If the judge would get angry or even miss anything that is correct procedures, he and many others would cry rcism and start looting. This judge is very clever, she is doing it all exaggeratingly proper, so that he has absolutely no leg to stand on if he tries any shenanigans. Amazing how some don't understand what a powder keg he is compared to others.
@@dingo1666 Why don't you have the courage to say what you actually want to say, instead of pussyfooting around it in your comment? As if because people like you are actually cowards who pretend to be tough guys. Go ahead and say it in plain terms if you're not a cowardly punk... But we all know you won't.
I wonder what name he signs in as to access his commissary. Or what name he gives when collecting his meals. Or what name his mother gives when calling him in prison... Does he ignore calls from his mother because she asks for Darrell Brooks?
“Objection: Hearsay.” 😂 The Judge giggled, too. Brooks doesn’t know what the word means. Sad, yes. But also pretty funny. I believe that in the terms of “Seinfeld,” we might say, “That’s a shame.”
He will be segregated for a while but will hate it--he's an extrovert and wants people's attention. He'll leave segregation soon as he can only to discover he is a hated killer of children and old people. He's screwed no matter what with 6 life sentences.
His constant statements that he doesn't consent to being called by his name yet he submits documents signed by Darrell Brookes? I wish he would look at what hearsay and speculation actually is.
This guy knows he committed these murders and he is still behaviing like he is innocent. He is trying to blame someone else. This is so disgusting. He was never held accountable for anything in his life. This circus needs to end.
Just because you shout objection and a random reason doesn't mean it's right! I've never watched a trial so closely, but as I live in Waukesha, I can't help it! He is RIDICULOUS and angry and a perpetual victim in all of this!
The judge should have ignored every objection he had, because he has no CLUE what he's doing. He doesn't know what here say is, yet, he used is constantly.
Got dang, you think he'd have some time in jail to look up the definition of hearsay. I get it's sorta complicated, but "Hey, can you tell me about this thing you directly witnessed?" is not hearsay. I'll say one thing for him, his understanding of the law, and the rules of evidence are about on par with the average US citizen ...
I suppose he will repeatedly object to his prison number too, but I doubt he will receive the kind of gentle treatment in prison that he received in court.
It eats Brooks alive knowing that he can't intimidate and control Judge Dorow like he does with every other woman in his life.
I've been loving how many incel-type men are being resided over by women lately. They'd be so mad.
Yes
That’s what I love the most. And there will be female COs that will dog him. But he will not last long in prison
I hope and pray that he is never around another woman in his lousy life.
Are you kidding? He totally owns her. Sure, the judge overrules his objections, but his constant objections severely interrupt witness accounts and I don't think the jury gets to hear a good record of what happened. My man certainly knows what he is doing! Very impressive. I bet he gets acquitted. More criminals should adopt this defense.
We don't give Lesli Boese and Zach Wittchow enough credit they too just as much deserve credit for how amazing they were during this trial and dealing with Brooks antics. I'm glad they were apart of this trial
How can you represent yourself when you say you don't exist 🤔
Lol!
Good one!!!😂😂
It’s so ridiculous! It’s a sovereign citizen tactic. It’s like the judge hasn’t proven jurisdiction! If there wasn’t jurisdiction then why even bother to show up ?
Love this! Spot on 😆
@@shorty.e7804 I'm from the Burnley the north of England, we don't mince our words, we say things as they are, this scumbag is digging himself into a very deep hole 🕳
I've been following this trail since the beginning, he thinks he's clever enough to beat the system, but he's actually beating himself with every objection and every word, you know and I know he'll never get out of prison and I welcome the day of his final sentence 😘
In prison he is going to rewatch this over and over and reminisce about both the absolute unfair way he was treated, but also how brilliant and smart he thinks he is.
Na, criminals don't have hindsight. Though they do have hindquarters which won't be his any longer as well.
In prison his attitude is going to get him shanked
@@BoredBob I think 2 days ago Darrell Brooks brought up how his life has been threatened by inmates and receiving hate mail from God knows from who or from where.
@@alantonix213 Good
And then get beat up back to reality where he's in prison for taking 6 lives because he mad that woman don't want his woman beating self anymore. 😒
All those objections and he still didn't know what hearsay meant.
He's wasting time and thinks he knows what he's doing. The judge was really upset with him yesterday, I thought she would kick him out. He's a selfish guy and I hate the witnesses have to deal with him.
Me too!
@Harlod Shekelbond LOL!
@Abi Brown I think it's a good idea the attorneys and the judge refer to him as the defendant. But I derive a great deal of pleasure when a couple of the officers looked him straight in the face and called him by his name.
@@D1it4FN oh man I do too...especially the red haired officer with a red beard...he would just glare at him right in the face!
@@virginiaknighten4687 I love that guy. He's the officer that fired three slugs into the back of the assholes suv.
Yeah he was awesome.
For someone who steadfastly agreed to represent himself in court, I would think that he would know the definition of "Hearsay" before using it constantly.
He doesn't care about getting it right.
He only cares about getting it his way.
When in Rome 😅
He can barely speak the English language.
You would think, but this guy is a classic example of someone who is way too impressed with himself and doesn't know what he doesn't know.
Brooks seems to pick a new legal term each day and use it regardless of context.
Rumor has it, Darrell Brooks hasn't stopped arguing with his shadow since he was found guilty. So far, his shadow is winning.
The amount of contempt brooks shows is clear, both for the witnesses and the court
@Harlod Shekelbond objection
@@sew161 grounds.
@@misssummersalt speculation
Is this comment under jurisdiction power or military power??
@@BlueBARv5 Violates my 6th amendment rights, therefore this case should be dismissed! I'm a sovereign citizen and I don't identify by that name!
He doesn’t even flinch over killing 6 people. Zero remorse.
Its no excuse, but it sounds like he had a manic episode.
Likely remembers little to anything
@@noshotnova2432 I agree. If only he let a defense lawyer.
He will prolong this farce as long as possible, he knows it's his last chance to feel [important].😐
Exactly
Yes!!!!
He's gonna be feeling a whole lot of things in prison, important will not be one of them.
Jackson Sparks, 8;Virginia Sorenson, 79;LeAnna Owens, 71;Tamara Durand, 52;Jane Kulich, 52;and Wilhelm Hospel, 82. These were the lives lost in the attack.Many more were injured and affected for life.
I feel for these people who have to deal with this ahole every day. It has to take so much patience.
I feel for whichever Jail Brooks ultimately ends up in - he will be disruptive to the tenth degree, trying the patience, on a daily basis, of the governor and staff - I bet they are having sweepstakes on who “doesn’t” get him!
@@smiffymiffed2734 you’re right, I didn’t even think of that
That POS actually shifted it into 'L' low gear (that's why the officer heard the high RPM) to make sure he'd barrel through the bodies because in regular 'D-drive' his SUV may not have had the torque to drive through/over all those human bodies he struck. Wow, POS.
Brookes family, if there are any that still stand with him, have got to be so ashamed. Not only that he’s a murderer but his actions in court. Honestly, I wouldn’t admit to knowing this FOOL!
His mom has done interviews and you can tell her parenting style exacerbated brooks issues. She says “he did not do this intentionally” so yea she is making excuses for him.
Apparently mum is the one coaching him on their daily jailhouse calls to act crazy in court. If it's true, she's as bad as he is.
@@moimeself1088 He probably didn’t get that messed up all his his own. From what I’ve heard so far, like you said, she’s backing up his murderous behavior. Just proves there are people in this world who should NEVER be allowed to reproduce. I’m not talking about his children as I know nothing about them. I’m sure they’re decent people as long as they haven’t been around their father too much.
So damn true. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if his mom was the only one to speak during the victim impact statements.
@@jamiemiesler322 💯 There's no doubt in my mind he was raised in a fatherless home
Objection I’m a dumb ass.
Judge: Sustained. Noted & Accurate
Grounds
Objection…Hearsay…speculative….relevancy….grounds…omg that’s all he says
At least he hasn’t used Amber Heard”s attorneys line “What if Anything?” Quote yet 😂😂
It's all he knows. And that knowledge is only that the options exist. He doesn't even know that it's its the judge who should be calling for grounds, any time the defence objects they give their grounds... Uuugh..
He's just throwing words at the wall and seeing if any stick. He does not seem to know the courtroom definition of any of them.
Very stupid man he is…
@@rrrjjj5572 I'm sure he's going back thru every word of testimony, every word the judge speaks, & everything that occurs with LE. He desperately needs someone or something to provoke a shut down.
Smile and raise your eyebrows all you want. That was the most damning testimony yet. The jury is watching you, Darrell Edward Brooks, Jr.
That was a part that I missed that he was almost gleeful as he drove through. Up until now I thought he had anger in his face or emotionless. But I guess we learn something new everyday.
Objection I do not consent to being called that name. I would also like the record to show that I am still waiting on subject matter jurisdiction
@@tcsprynce5748 GROUNZ!
Not first, middle and last name👏🏽👏🏽🧡🤣
I like how he doesn’t want to identify himself as Mr brooks but takes offense to everything said about the driver/killer…ok sir
Not one ounce of remorse. This person Darrell Brooks is so inhumane. True definition of Narcissism.
I have to admit it’s humorous he just throws out objections without thoughtfully thinking or knowing why he is even objecting I truly don’t think he even understands half the phrases he spews 😂 Also the fact he has little to no knowledge of legal
Lines of questioning then has the audacity in another clip to say the judge is being unfair towards him. Unreal!
I watch this for the comedy
Thats a bold assumption
There needs to be a law that says total idiots cannot represent themselves this is absolutely absurd!
There actually is, but i wonder if denying his right to represent himself might lead to an appeal
Let him dig his own grave
"Objection, Your Honor: I'm clearly a flipping lunatic."
"Sustained. But Mr. Brooks, stating the obvious won't get you anywhere with me."
"You too can become your own lawyer by watching Darrell Brook's Sovereign Citizen video by using just these 4 words to get out of anything!"
Objection!
Grounds!
Leading!
Relevance!
He isn't a lunatic. He's just an arrogant, entitled, violent, disrespectful, manipulative manchild with an attitude.
He’s trying to hold up this court because he’s loving his 15 minutes of fame.
More like 15 hours of fame
@@scooopable More like 15 days of fame
@@alantonix213 right
Classic lol. The defendant can’t object to the witnesses comment about his body language because then he would have to admit it was him in the car 😂
That’s a great prosecutor question…”Do you get paid more if you you find a guilty verdict “ lol
Best question ever.
DB clearly enjoying these videos way too much. Strong witness. Didn’t waiver. Like this particular prosecutor; clear, concise, no nonsense. 😅
Remove his mask let's see his true face expressions I don't think he but busy out his smiles sick fx
@Chantelle gattrell yep, hiding behind his mask for sure.
His entire strategy is to throw out random objections and see which one sticks
Bro is tossin words out like he binge watched Law and Order 😂
This was one of the only times that I could tell Zack had had enough! LOL
What's funny is that he would say "objection leading" at all the wrong times. And at at least one point in this officer's testimony, there was an actual leading question and he missed it 😂
Just duct tape his mouth shut already........................
Is he representing himself? Some stupid objections there and needs to read the definition of here-say.
Cmon he is black so everything he does is just bad😂. You ppl I swear 😂
Yeah I asked that 30 seconds in… no doubts now. 😂
He is representing himself. He's tried everything to get this delayed or thrown out. He shows no remorse whatsoever.
Right, he doesn't know what it means, he should have looked it up before he began using it 100s of times
Yeah he only knows that they exist, not what they mean. He misuses hearsay and grounds every time.
This defendant could screw up a one car funeral!
😂
Is there anyone from his family that's ever present in the courtroom?
😆
@@naomisims7230 I saw an interview with his mom, his closest known family member, and literally (I’m not joking) she can’t be at the trial because it was her red SUV he crashed into the parade and she can’t find transportation.
Again, this sounds like a bad joke but that is actually why she said she couldn’t come 🙊
@@OpalBLeigh she also said because of death threats to her etc and being easily identified
I love when he doesn’t consent to his name now that it’s attached to his crimes
It's funny he flipped the script during his trial. Watch his interrogation at the police department the same day when he was arrested at the parade. The detectives use his name, Darrell Brooks numerous times and he acknowledges that is his name.
We need to stop allowing criminals to represent themselves, as it is like pouring salt in the wounds of everyone in the court room!!!
Absolutely agree. He is disruptive, arrogant, and should NOT be allowed to subvert justice to save himself. The law MUST be changed in murder cases that the witnesses do not have to be cross-examined by their attempted murderer!
no, we do not need to stop allowing people from representing themselves because of one asshat. this is the exact type of nanny bs that leads to tyranny. control your emotions and maybe look up why we have that right in the first place before you call for its removal.
An attorney couldn't even represent him anyway. He'd yell and scream over him. No legal defense attorney is going to use a sovereign citizen argument as a reason for innocence or leniency they'd be 100% disbarred and that is the only defense Darrell Brooks would allow.
Late comment, but this foundational law won’t be changed. The judge spent about two hours explaining the benefit of counsel.
Additionally, this is why we have due process: he’s assumed innocent until convicted by a jury of his peers. In legal terms, this was actually a then innocent person representing himself.
The nice thing is that due to the overwhelming evidence, the judge’s saintly patience, and Mr. Brooks’ abhorrent behavior, he won’t have a chance even if he is granted an appeal.
Can't stop them ,it's a constitutional right.
“Objection here say” lmao it’s SO funny watching him play as if he is a lawyer or attorney or something its hilarious
This maniac would not know hearsay if it punched him in the mouth
I bet the judge would love to have the chance
Giving The witness 30 seconds would be justice
She gets to sentence him to life when this is all over. So she has that to look forward to.
Also him saying "I do not consent to that sentence" while getting life.
I wonder what name he signs in as to access his commissary. Or what name he gives when collecting his meals. Or what name his mother gives when calling him in prison... Does he ignore calls from his mother because she asks for Darrell Brooks?
You cant call prison.... you have to wait for the inmate to call you
😂😂😂😂😂😂
He identified himself as himself when he was arrested sooooo he’s fighting a losing battle
I doubt Brooks ignores his Mother. I think that he may be quite the Mama's boy.
He won't have to answer to his name in prison. He will have a number to answer to. I just thought of something that would be soooo in-his-face (although maybe not legally pertinent). Make him give a DNA sample, and compare it to his mother. Will stop all comments about him not answering to that name.
If Mr Brooks objects to being called, ‘Mr Brooks’ ……. What then does he want be addressed as?
I wonder the same thing.
My guess is: “smartest living man in the courtroom,” by special appearance of course! 😂
Or Mr. invisible 🤷🏻♀️
I wish someone had asked him that because I’m now watching 10 hours or footage to find out.
Fry him already, America!
That can only happen if he gets federal hate crime charges. If races were reversed this would probably happen.
in due time lol
@@alanbegley7602 no, Wisconsin doesn’t have death penalty. If he had federal hate crime charges he could get capital punishment. The races would have to be reversed for that to happen though.
This terrorist should get the gitmo treatment.
He’s going to be objecting to a lot of things in prison 😂
When Bubba gets him from behind, he is going to be crying objection. With each thrust, Bubba will gleefully reply, Overruled!
That last look is hilarious. He's thinking "not panicked or scared".... can that work for me?
Wow, the defendant has heard words from TV court shows and he thinks repeating them over and over makes him look like a f*****g genius.
It's because he thinks everyone else is just pretending, because it is out of his scope to imagine people who are cleverer than him. You can't imagine something that isn't there. Dunning Kruger effect.
He's hoping the court trips up, for his appeal.....
All of the Prosecutors for the State are very good, but I like the male Prosecutor best. Quietly determined. Knows his stuff.
Me too, and good looking too!
I object to this low life dragging this procedure out! It is high time to try and find this clown guilty because that is what he is!
I think dude is having fun playing " lawyer "! 🤔
From @7:45 to @7:55 not a peep from Brooks at making a new object nor renewing his prior objection. Brooks is so far over his head that it’s mind boggling.
Nah, that look says, "Doesn't this guy know I don't identify as Darrell Brook's, nor have I ever gone by that name. I am a 3rd party representative representing my client! I have stated this repeatedly and therefore think this case should be dismissed!" (So that I may get behind the wheel of another vehicle and run more whoite people over.)
At 4:39 it does look like Mr. Brooks is hanging out of the window just like the police officer is testifying about. You can see movement by the window area and it looks like a white/grey shirt is leaning out.
Also it bothers me so much that Mr. Brooks is constantly interrupting court proceedings. He clearly does not know what speculative and Hearsay are. He asked for more time because it is not fair for him to go through all that material. He wants to represent himself, was told what Wisconsin law is. You can not have a standby lawyer to help you out. Now he wants a standby lawyer. The judge told him she could not give him legal advice, now he wants her give him legal advice.
The best, he said he never waived his right to a speedy trial and is complaining that they should have started earlier but wants more time because he doesn’t know the law and has to go through all the discoveries.
You can’t have it both ways.
He can have stand-by counsel but he cannot have it from the public defenders office. Since he did not have stand-by counsel lined up when he chose to represent himself, he has no right to him?
@@alecsmith8341 I was just listening to the judge and she told him because he is representing himself, standby counsel would not be provided to him. Apparently the state of Wisconsin does not have the funds to provide standby counsel. I think Me, Brooks would have dismissed the standby counsel and then complained he didn’t have standby counsel.
@@tamarinbush6613 he had public defenders. The state public dedenders office does not provide stand-by counsel services due to lack of funding and scheduling. He is able to find lawyers to serve as stand-by counsel but the state is under no obligation to provide it and he has no right to it from the public defenders office
@@alecsmith8341 gotcha! I think I understand. You are saying he can have standby counsel if he pays for it. Correct?
After watching the past 2 days he has been nothing but rude to both the judge and prosecutors. He has been loud and very menacing. She caught Mr. Brooks staring her down this last time, but he did stare her down at least once before. And I totally agree with her. I wouldn’t feel safe having him stare at me like that. He is trying his best to have the case thrown out? Get the conviction overturn on appeal if he is found guilty.
It was interesting to see him lose his cool when the prosecutor said what prior bad acts they would have to bring into court if he kept questioning his ex girlfriend.
Also my opinion I think his mama is trying to help him discredit his ex girlfriend. I don’t think he gets her testimony still doesn’t get him found not guilty when they have multiple witnesses who saw him driving and obviously video of him driving.
@@tamarinbush6613 so, he can have stand-by counsel if he pays out of pocket or they take it pro-bono.
He is fishing for criminal contempt of court so that he can delay the trial more. Criminal contempt comes with being held in jail for a set period of time or until the party agrees to behave. The judge has said she will not do it since he is already in custody and it would allow him to profit from his misdeeds. The precedent from the case she has cited repeatedly, Illinois vs Allen, is being properly applied and he has no leg to stand on when it comes to being removed from the courtroom.
As to his mother, she doesn't think he is necessarily a bad person just has mental health problems, but as to using her to impeach his baby momma, im not sure. I think he wanted to torment her more since its already proven he is abusive towards her.
Objection, the answer to this question hurts my case 🤣
He should have called Saul.
He reminds me of myself when I was in the 5th grade! Thank god I grew up and got common sense!
I said this along time ago. Brooks enjoying himself. He found this as an opportunity, and he enjoyed every second of it.
I wonder why that clown shaved his dreads??? And that clown has no clue how to be a lawyer. Object object object.. he has no clue what he’s doing
The one question that called for speculation he didn't object to.
He just does not understand hearsay at all.
He doesn't know what hearsay is pitiful
Judge: mr brooks your case is dismissed.
Mr. Brooks: objection.
It's so adorable... Doesn't know what hearsay means 🤪😆😃
Someone farted at 6:13
Yes, Anti-white mass murderers are usually a barrel full of laughs.
Or the proper use of grounds. Or what speculative means. Or "substained".
He also doesn’t know the difference between an axe, and asking a question! 🤷🏼♂️
@@BoHolbo omg I’ve been thinking the same! He’s an embarrassment. His family can’t possibly claim his ignorant, murdering ass.
The saying goes "When you represent yourself, you have a fool for a client" but he's a special kind of fool.
Objection, hearsay, speculative. Also relevancy and grounds.
He is doing these objection on purpose he is making a fool of himself.
His case in chief is really going to suck and probably take such a long time. I feel so badly for the families and victims, the judge, the jury, and prosecution.
This is so embarrassing! I love it!
Here's an objection. I object to your existance.
Judge Dorow is probably SO TIRED of hearing OBJECTION!!!
This witness just now due to the cross Brooks. Well done, sir.❤
Can someone please tell me what he claims his name is, and what's his defense?
He keeps saying that he is a Sovereign citizen. I've been watching and I never have heard the actual name. I bet he identified as Mathboi Fly is rap nMe lol
@@fghyjhku I though I maybe missed something. Thanks for the reply.
Witch
The name thing is this mythical loophole where because they spelled his name in all caps it doesn't count somehow. As far as I can tell he's going for the Homer Simpson defense. I didn't do it, It Wasn't Me, it was somebody else, somebody made me do it.
SovCits I think are all about contracts. They claim they've never entered into a contractual relationship with the state and since there's no contract there's no entity to prosecute. So sorta like "You're talking about some entity but that entity can't be me because I don't have a contract with you." And because there's no contract the court has no jurisdiction. Which is all nonsense.
Pretty sick to see that monster making a mockery of the court.
The fact he has been allowed to act the way he has and disrespect the court is such a disgrace and slap in the face to the justice system. The Prosecutors, jurors, and CR should not have to be put through any of this. The judge deserves it since she's actually allowing it. NO ONE else would get away with treating a judge this way during a trail. WHY him?
I think there's a lot more lunacy in courts day to say than you might imagine. It's his right to act a fool and they're gonna extend him every courtesy to demonstrate they didn't interfere with his rights so the decision stands on appeal.
There have been a couple times the prosecution has raised his behavior as an issue and she's told him to tone it down.
They are politely escorting him to the gates of Hell.
He is one of the 'special people' and he's representing himself. If the judge would get angry or even miss anything that is correct procedures, he and many others would cry rcism and start looting. This judge is very clever, she is doing it all exaggeratingly proper, so that he has absolutely no leg to stand on if he tries any shenanigans. Amazing how some don't understand what a powder keg he is compared to others.
She's allowing it as to eliminate any chance of him winning an Appeal. She's letting him bury himself by his vocal outbursts and behavior.
Exactly
@@dingo1666 Why don't you have the courage to say what you actually want to say, instead of pussyfooting around it in your comment? As if because people like you are actually cowards who pretend to be tough guys. Go ahead and say it in plain terms if you're not a cowardly punk... But we all know you won't.
McDonald's employee - would you like fries with your burger
Brooks - objection, hearsay. Who told you I want fries 🍟
I feel for the Judge and everyone involved having to put up with this idiot Brooks! What a waste of everyone’s time🙄
and a waste of air.
Hes just guessing on all the objections hoping to get 1 right... Bet he didn't graduate high school. He should get life for that hairline
And what does he want to be called?
He is representing himself as an “entity”. It has its “perks” but also its downsides. Being an “entity” also means he gets to have a closing argument.
Anti-white Mass Murderer, I believe.
I wonder what name he signs in as to access his commissary. Or what name he gives when collecting his meals. Or what name his mother gives when calling him in prison... Does he ignore calls from his mother because she asks for Darrell Brooks?
innocent
Brooks objections are always bad and or inaccurate.
Everything he says or does is inaccurate
Once in a while he gets a sustained objection. Sometimes the prosecution repeats a question and he'll notice that.
“Objection: Hearsay.” 😂 The Judge giggled, too. Brooks doesn’t know what the word means. Sad, yes. But also pretty funny. I believe that in the terms of “Seinfeld,” we might say, “That’s a shame.”
That poor stenographer
I like how he says literally ANYTHING to delay the trial.
I swear the only legal terms he knows is objection, constitution, hearsay, and my fave SUBSTAINED 😂🤣😂🤣
Groundzzz!
Wow. Great question. Awesome
He still hasn't figured out what hearsay means.
It’s still amazes me that after all the time he spent looking up case law he couldn’t lookup the definition of hearsay.
This is still a registered sX offender, released on a $1k bond on another offense and still did this😔
Unless he's in sole confinement, I put the over under on how long other prisoners let him live at about two months.
He is at mental housing he is safe
He will be segregated for a while but will hate it--he's an extrovert and wants people's attention. He'll leave segregation soon as he can only to discover he is a hated killer of children and old people. He's screwed no matter what with 6 life sentences.
His constant statements that he doesn't consent to being called by his name yet he submits documents signed by Darrell Brookes? I wish he would look at what hearsay and speculation actually is.
Really? I think he's doing just fine. The trial is hopping right along and we should have a verdict soon.
Engine revving, was the transmission downshifting because he was standing on the pedal
Brooks-“objection…..word I don’t know definition I”
Judge “over ruled “
In his mind he probably thinks he's in the courtroom from Idiocracy, the irony behind that is he'd probably be found guilty there aswell
This guy knows he committed these murders and he is still behaviing like he is innocent. He is trying to blame someone else. This is so disgusting. He was never held accountable for anything in his life. This circus needs to end.
He objects to words than he has no clue what they mean. Complete waste of human air.
He doesn’t even know what or how to object to.
Just because you shout objection and a random reason doesn't mean it's right! I've never watched a trial so closely, but as I live in Waukesha, I can't help it! He is RIDICULOUS and angry and a perpetual victim in all of this!
There’s no way the jury is taking this fool seriously… come on..
In response, Brooks demonstrates mock outrage.
This king needs to be respected. He’s not supposed to be held responsible for his actions.
The judge should have ignored every objection he had, because he has no CLUE what he's doing. He doesn't know what here say is, yet, he used is constantly.
Objection! This is hurting my case
Is it more or less of a hate crime if you do it casually?
Got dang, you think he'd have some time in jail to look up the definition of hearsay. I get it's sorta complicated, but "Hey, can you tell me about this thing you directly witnessed?" is not hearsay. I'll say one thing for him, his understanding of the law, and the rules of evidence are about on par with the average US citizen ...
He’s probably talking to some SovCit “lawyer” & getting definitions etc from them
Just because he can look up the definition doesn't mean he can understand what is written.
I suppose he will repeatedly object to his prison number too, but I doubt he will receive the kind of gentle treatment in prison that he received in court.