The Why of VFR Minimums (PA.I.E.K1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • Most of you have probably memorized your VFR minimums by now, but examiners are not happy with rote memorization anymore. In this video I discuss why VFR minimums are what they are in the different classes of airspace.
    Timestamps
    00:00 Start
    00:37 Class A Airspace
    01:01 Class B Airspace
    01:29 Class C/D/E Airspace
    02:28 Class E over 10,000 feet
    03:11 Class G Airspace
    03:54 Closing
    If you’ve got a checkride coming up, download our app from the App Store where you can access our manuals that address every element in the ACS: apps.apple.com/app/apple-stor...
    For more information and resources check out our website at answerstotheacs.com/.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @positiverateofclimb694
    @positiverateofclimb694 6 днів тому +4

    Finally. Thank you so much. This should be in every aviation book BEFORE VFR weather minimums are mentioned.

  • @TheAirplaneDriver
    @TheAirplaneDriver 5 днів тому +1

    Nice summary. I believe, however, that the 500’ below limitation for “standard” VFR is probably to allow more wiggle room on low overcast days. Specifically, if it was 1,000’ below and you needed to maintain 1,000’ AGL over congested areas you couldn’t fly unless the ceiling was 2,000’ or more.

  • @StudentPilot4Life
    @StudentPilot4Life 20 днів тому +2

    This was very insightful, especially the 500 below and 1000 above part. Thanks for the clear explanation, relating it back to the reaction time!

  • @patrickomalley7162
    @patrickomalley7162 21 день тому

    Keep up the good work Patrick. Love the app so far!!

    • @AnswerstotheACS
      @AnswerstotheACS  21 день тому

      Thanks Patrick!

    • @BrianCrider-dp3xx
      @BrianCrider-dp3xx 20 днів тому

      Thank you for this. The 500 below 1000 above was bothering me. Now, it makes sense.

  • @alk672
    @alk672 19 днів тому +3

    The 500 below vs 1000 above is probably wrong. The more likely reason is because commercial airliners tend to descend slowly and climb faster. So 500 below and 1000 above makes sense.
    Overall though - this visibility calculation and collision avoidance reaction time just shows why see and avoid doesn't work and why these minima are complete BS. That calculation assumes one of the pilots sees the other one. Why would they? They could both be in each other's blind spot. Completely ridiculous. Let's just come up with some BS theoretical number and keep doubling it... come on.
    The real problem with VFR weather minima is of course that they can't be enforced or even followed, not even by the most well-intended pilot. You can't measure distance to a cloud (outside of certain very specific circumstances where exact measurements are present), so the whole thing is a complete joke. Of course, this is probably the most amount of rote memorization anywhere in the private ACS, a complete waste of time and brainpower.

  • @DNModels
    @DNModels 5 днів тому

    The real answer is because there are never enough self-invented tasks for pencil pushers.
    Show me a device that measures your distance from a small cloud, then I'll agree there is reason.
    Plus, with DPEs and Instructors alike, on a daily basis the rules are broken.
    This is one of the biggest jokes of the US rule system.