Dutch court rules Sulu sultan’s heirs cannot seize Malaysian assets

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @fitrizaabah5443
    @fitrizaabah5443 Рік тому +13

    The dirty tricks is on the sulu sultanate that wish to gain wealth. Sabah was already become independent before joining Malaysia formation. Sulu has no power or no ownership for Sabah back then.

    • @simonriley118
      @simonriley118 Рік тому +1

      The illegal occupiers and squatters of Sabah. Sabah is a private property of the Sultanate of Sulu. Everyone who lives there that is not a Filipino should leave the island.

    • @fitrizaabah5443
      @fitrizaabah5443 Рік тому +6

      @@simonriley118 You sure did not see the history and know nothing about the condition. The Malaysian people of Sabah is no illegal occupiers of Sabah, and Sabah is also not a private property of the Sultanate of Sulu. No cession of the Brunei to Sulu was establish, only the offer before the civil war. Sabah people was already there before the Sulu sultanate claim the land in 1658. The sultanate's political power was already relinquished in March 1915 in the carpenter agreement. The residents had exercised their act of self-determination when they joined to form the Malaysian federation in 1963. This was acknowledged by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory as supported by the findings of the Cobbold Commission.
      Philippines govt do not officially recognize Sulu Sultan after 1986. Sulu sultan has no power and no right for Sabah Malaysia.

    • @simonriley118
      @simonriley118 Рік тому

      @@fitrizaabah5443 do you really think Malaysia owns Sabah? Then why does Malaysia paid the Sultanate of Sulu for annual payment of RM 5300 cession money? Malaysia literally just rented Sabah to the Sultanate of Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu was granted the north-eastern part of the territory as a prize for helping the Sultan of Brunei against his enemies in 1658. Do you really think the Sultanate of Sulu would make up stories? What for? The claim wasn't just a made up claims. It is based on history and a lot of negotiation papers. In fact, Sabah should not be part of Malaysia nor the Philippines. Sabah should be just for the Sabahan people. Sabah belongs to the Sabahan for the same reason the Philippines belongs to the Filipino. Well its like hongkong belongs to china even though they dont want to be part of china and that taiwan belongs to china therefore they speak chinese even though they dont want to be part of china. Malaysians have no respect for the old ways WHO have the claims of the land since hundreds of years ago. The PH government did not officially recognize Sultan of Sulu after 1986? Lol only the Aquino administration did not recognized it because they are a traitor. They aligned themselves to Malaysia. The deceased Ninoy Aquino made a condition to Malaysia to help him oust Marcos in exchange for giving Sabah to Malaysia. The former presidents of the Philippines was only unable to gain consensus on the matter so they officially put aside in order to improve ties with Malaysia.

    • @themalaysianpatriot3099
      @themalaysianpatriot3099 11 місяців тому

      @@simonriley118 That is a false narrative created by the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs. North Borneo (Sabah) previously belonged to Brunei before they ceded the entire territory to the British under the 1877 agreement, in the agreement it clearly states that North Borneo will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). However the Sultan of Sulu came along and falsely claims that North Borneo belongs to them, and to avoid a possible war in the region the British enter the 1878 agreement with the Sulu Sultanate which states that Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo to the BNBC which was the original meaning of “pajak” and was agreed as such by both the British and the Sulu Sultan however the Sulu heirs of the now defunct Sulu Sultanate then twisted the original meaning and claims that the word pajak actually means “lease and rent”. The British then agreed to pay 5,000 Mexican gold coins annually to the Sultan of Sulu as cession money for North Borneo but the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs twisted the narrative yet again and claims that the payment is “rent money”.

    • @ReformationUA
      @ReformationUA 5 місяців тому +4

      ​@@simonriley118 That's actually bloody mental 😭 You want to deport Non-Filipino people out of their homeland because it was owned by a dethroned royal family? What a way to make enemies 😂 The Philippines will be isolated like the North Korea if you did something like that 😭

  • @guillotin007
    @guillotin007 5 місяців тому +1

    Brunei Sultanate promised Sabah to Sulu Sultanate if only they aid them in war. But what happen? They chicken out and did not adhere to the promise. So, Sulu claiming Sabah is baseless and no foundation at all because they did not help at all during the war.

  • @kingphiliptongco2273
    @kingphiliptongco2273 Рік тому +15

    Malaysia Government playing Dirty

    • @megroslmegr7504
      @megroslmegr7504 Рік тому +11

      Tell that to the court

    • @kingphiliptongco2273
      @kingphiliptongco2273 Рік тому +5

      @@megroslmegr7504 British in Malaysia Playing Dirty

    • @megroslmegr7504
      @megroslmegr7504 Рік тому +11

      @@kingphiliptongco2273 Talk to UN if ur not happy

    • @BadtobbyBad
      @BadtobbyBad Рік тому

      Malaysian people steal sabah with the help of dutch.

    • @franciscogozo2229
      @franciscogozo2229 Рік тому

      Malaydesh a greedy country, soon the Truth will prevail with the help of Philippine government just watch out malaydesh

  • @edgarmendoza2397
    @edgarmendoza2397 Рік тому +3

    Playing dirtiest tricks malaysia its colonial era land its a renting territory

    • @fitrizaabah5443
      @fitrizaabah5443 Рік тому +5

      Sulu dirty tricks after failed try to take over using arm forces. The people of Sabah already choose to join Malaysia while the weak sultanate at that time has no power to intervene. Sulu Sultanate in Sabah was history.

    • @edgarmendoza2397
      @edgarmendoza2397 Рік тому

      @@fitrizaabah5443
      It's not history there a proof that land is only renting by British coloniser

    • @ZairatulIshaak
      @ZairatulIshaak Рік тому +3

      Sabah people already chose Malaysia not philipines.What is renting territory?the last times i know that sulu sultanate come from Johor,invade north Borneo island and then married with Brunei princess..

    • @themalaysianpatriot3099
      @themalaysianpatriot3099 11 місяців тому +1

      That is a false narrative created by the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs. North Borneo (Sabah) previously belonged to Brunei before they ceded the entire territory to the British under the 1877 agreement, in the agreement it clearly states that North Borneo will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). However the Sultan of Sulu came along and falsely claims that North Borneo belongs to them, and to avoid a possible war in the region the British enter the 1878 agreement with the Sulu Sultanate which states that Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo to the BNBC which was the original meaning of “pajak” and was agreed as such by both the British and the Sulu Sultan however the Sulu heirs of the now defunct Sulu Sultanate then twisted the original meaning and claims that the word pajak actually means “lease and rent”. The British then agreed to pay 5,000 Mexican gold coins annually to the Sultan of Sulu as cession money for North Borneo but the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs twisted the narrative yet again and claims that the payment is “rent money”.

  • @daneurope9167
    @daneurope9167 11 місяців тому +3

    malaysia knows well they never owned sabah..brunei must tell malaysia to leave sabah.

    • @horizon809
      @horizon809 4 місяці тому +1

      And give it back to Brunei? They already accepted that the territory is apart of Malaysia