Nice intro to this worthwhile topic. One thing of note to Mac users, even the so-called Silicon version of Izotope RX, most recent version, runs much much slower and hogs much more RAM than Acon Acoustica most recent version (and many older versions). When separating out stems - Acoustica not only can separate out keys (Izotope still cannot) it barely uses any RAM. It’s speed of execution on M1 silicon Macs is about 8 times faster than the same processes in IzoRX. However, Izotope offers an AI on top of their products, Acon's does not. Perhaps the reason for the difference: AI vs no-AI. So, different tools for different jobs. I have noticed better rendering in Acon in stem separation, cannot say on other functions. Thanks and keep up the great work you all! #AconM1Superior #IzotopesAIrocks
Thanks Paul. excellent video. I have been using acoustic alongside RX and Absentia DX for a while. It really is fantastic. artuclarly handy and quick to use is the Dialogue Extract mobile. I do find using it as a standalone 'app' that it is a bit difficult to navigate. The instructional videos from ACON are not great Perhaps they will improve these as more and more people take to using it. Look forward to more great content from you!.
As an RX "power user" I think I could do better with RX. One thing that I really like with RX is the ability to use third party plugins within RX. I wonder if the plugins would work within RX just to have additional tools available to do the job. For example, I use Clarity Vx Pro while in RX. I find it much better than Dialogue Isolate. Dialogue Extract seems pretty powerful. I didn't care for the fuzzy artifacting though. So maybe not a replacement but perhaps an addition to.
Very interesting video, currently have Izotope elements and Acon Dialogue Extract, I’m considering this instead of RX Advanced because of the high price. Also, broadband on RX has never sounded good to me
Nice intro to this worthwhile topic.
One thing of note to Mac users, even the so-called Silicon version of Izotope RX, most recent version, runs much much slower and hogs much more RAM than Acon Acoustica most recent version (and many older versions). When separating out stems - Acoustica not only can separate out keys (Izotope still cannot) it barely uses any RAM. It’s speed of execution on M1 silicon Macs is about 8 times faster than the same processes in IzoRX.
However, Izotope offers an AI on top of their products, Acon's does not. Perhaps the reason for the difference: AI vs no-AI. So, different tools for different jobs. I have noticed better rendering in Acon in stem separation, cannot say on other functions. Thanks and keep up the great work you all! #AconM1Superior #IzotopesAIrocks
I agree. I use both on my new MacBook Pro and Acoustica is far quicker.
Thanks Paul. excellent video. I have been using acoustic alongside RX and Absentia DX for a while. It really is fantastic. artuclarly handy and quick to use is the Dialogue Extract mobile. I do find using it as a standalone 'app' that it is a bit difficult to navigate. The instructional videos from ACON are not great Perhaps they will improve these as more and more people take to using it. Look forward to more great content from you!.
Bought the Acon Acoustica suite for the very good dereverb, it has quickly become my very fast out of pro tools editor.
As an RX "power user" I think I could do better with RX. One thing that I really like with RX is the ability to use third party plugins within RX. I wonder if the plugins would work within RX just to have additional tools available to do the job. For example, I use Clarity Vx Pro while in RX. I find it much better than Dialogue Isolate. Dialogue Extract seems pretty powerful. I didn't care for the fuzzy artifacting though. So maybe not a replacement but perhaps an addition to.
Very interesting video, currently have Izotope elements and Acon Dialogue Extract, I’m considering this instead of RX Advanced because of the high price. Also, broadband on RX has never sounded good to me
'bird noise' can be a blessing....