AC/DC. Back In Black - The Final Mix - Inside Secrets
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- Sound Engineer Tony Platt on mixing the AC/DC's album 'Back In Black'.
From the documentary film "AC/DC - Back In Black. A Classic Album Under Review". Buy the DVD at
www.amazon.com/...
www.amazon.co.u...
www.chromedream...
This man is an absolute genius, a treasure to the world of music.
He had Van Gogh,s ear 👂 for music 🎶 allright
That is the best album in the world in my opinion. It has brilliant sound where you feel like your actually in the studio but also could imagine being at a live show. It would have been all but impossible to please all of those people all of the time but Tony did it. Bloody Genius.
and that's what it takes to have the 2nd best selling album of all time
back in black is the best mix ever
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one. But my opinion is that Back In Black is the best rock album ever recorded.
have ears will travel!!
Get where he’s coming from but got a chuckle out of that. If there’s one band where you could get away with leaving the same mix settings for the next song it would be AC/DC…lol
I know ✌️🌞🎛️🎛️🎛️🎛️🎛️🎸🎸🎸
Interesting how cohesive each track on the album sounds.
The lesson is capture the sources sounds better possible. So in mix only get the correct balance.😊
The cymbals are perfect. Not harsh
Where was the huge AC/DC bell forged?
probably satans bellend
Some foundry in Germany
Loughborough England
Musik zu beschreiben ist wie "Eulen nach Athen zu tragen". Kleine Hörbeispiel wären doch nichtbzu sehr Top Secret gewesen oder???
The real producer was Malcolm Young, Mutt just followed the instructions.
@@pringles4312 LOL then how come the 3 AC/DC Mutt albums have his signature sound? The band was tired of Mutt's perfectionism by FTATR and they self-produced the next 2 albums as a 'return to roots.' The result? Flick of the Switch and Fly on the Wall sound like SHIT, sonically terrible. The band clearly didn't know anything about producing a record, hence why they've used a producer EVERY album since.
@@pringles4312 I agree with you that malcolm had a certain sound or direction he wanted to go in, and I doubt they would've worked with Mutt if they didn't think they would get it, --- in fact, I believe they threw Eddie Kramer out of the studio after 1 or 2 days, if memory is serving me right. Mutt was the next guy to work with them and it clicked.
Vanda and Young were replaced for Highway to Hell under pressure from Atlantic., or else AC-DC would have kept production within the family. Atlantic wanted to take them to a next level of accessability that they were not getting from Vanda and Young.
The stuff produced by Vanda and Young sounded different than Mutt's records, and what AC-DC made with Switch & Fly have a different sound as well.
You may be correct that the sound was exactly what Malcom was looking for, but it was the producers who affected each incarnation of that sound which Malcom choose. Mutt's handiwork is all over his albums, no matter which artist he works with.
@@mrmustard4478 2 of my favourites flick and fly. Sure they were rougher but that was deliberate and worked very well at that time of their career. I personally love the production on those albums but yes wasn't as commercial a sound as the Mutt albums but a lot dirtier and edgy.
Your right, Malcolm is the man 🎛️🎛️🎛️🎛️🎛️🎸