The Shining: Ending Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
  • What happened at the end of Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining? Until the last minute, the plot seems to be wrapping up in a conventional way. But... Support us on Patreon (Thank you!): www.patreon.co...
    Sign up for exclusive updates: bit.ly/2oVVB1Q
    If you like this video, subscribe to our UA-cam channel for more.
    Like ScreenPrism on Facebook: / screenprism
    Follow ScreenPrism on Twitter: / screenprism
    Visit ScreenPrism.com: screenprism.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,4 тис.

  • @thetake
    @thetake  7 років тому +315

    Support ScreenPrism on our new Patreon page: www.patreon.com/user?u=7792695
    Thanks so much for watching. Be sure to subscribe and let us know which videos you want to see next!

    • @Captain-Cosmo
      @Captain-Cosmo 6 років тому +3

      How is alcoholism supposed to be a factor when the alcohol is NOT REAL?

    • @shack8110
      @shack8110 6 років тому

      I think you're reading too much into a Stephen king story about madness and a haunted hotel. Jeez!

    • @BBL.
      @BBL. 6 років тому

      ScreenPrism ii

    • @Insanemembrane93
      @Insanemembrane93 6 років тому +3

      The cycle wasn't broken completely because Jack still was able to kill at least one person on Hotel grounds.

    • @sammydogg123
      @sammydogg123 6 років тому

      Is there a way to find out who the people are with Jack in that photo at the end? If possible the names would be awesome. I have heard theories on who they are but I need something to confirm it. Ty.

  • @belalugosi9404
    @belalugosi9404 6 років тому +6873

    Another explanation I like for the Shining is that Jack says, "I'd give my goddamn soul for a drink and only then does Lloyd appear and give him a drink. After this he also can fade into the different timelines of the hotel. I believe that he sold his soul to the hotel and that the hotel is the vessel of some demon and Jack now has to do it's bidding.

    • @izzie481
      @izzie481 5 років тому +234

      good analysis

    • @AnjanaBSubba
      @AnjanaBSubba 5 років тому +348

      That actually makes a lot of sense.

    • @shellygardner6410
      @shellygardner6410 5 років тому +383

      I think that's a good interpretation, also as explained, the hotel shines. Danny and Jack both have the ability to shine as well. Jack interpets, and is influenced by what he sees quite differently than Danny. Jack thinks he is hallucinating, and he needs a drink. Inadvertently giving his soul for a drink. Things don't improve for Jack after that. Eventually even Wendy sees the shine on the hotel when she sees the bear costume guy and the hotel worker. Remember the hotel can show the past, the future, and can even communicate ideas to a person that also shines. Its up to the viewer, to decide what the hotel has shown to them. I think this is why this movie is so good. It needs the viewer to be involved, and also shine a little!

    • @chipperdrewski
      @chipperdrewski 5 років тому +47

      Well said, Dracula...

    • @yamiko8
      @yamiko8 5 років тому +11

      That's what I was thinking all the time

  • @sirraident
    @sirraident 6 років тому +3357

    "I said I'm not going to hurt you. I'm just going to bash your brains in."
    That is one of the most Jack Nicholson thing to say.

    • @Fmontes
      @Fmontes 5 років тому +39

      That is one of my favorite lines in the film.
      Another is, "I'm the kind of man that likes to know who's buying his drinks..."
      The other is JN's insistence that Wendy "check out the Snow Cat."
      The butler in the bar had a couple of good lines as well.

    • @brette6854
      @brette6854 5 років тому +25

      Nicholson*

    • @usernameschecksout
      @usernameschecksout 5 років тому

      Hell yeah

    • @jqyhlmnp
      @jqyhlmnp 4 роки тому +3

      Raident what are, some kinda of Suicide squad

    • @DDios-ih9de
      @DDios-ih9de 4 роки тому +8

      Raident My FAVOURITE LINE in The movie
      Wendy
      Darling
      Light of my life....

  • @rchedan
    @rchedan 6 років тому +2940

    The photograph is the part of the movie that freaked me out the most.

    • @ibkristykat
      @ibkristykat 6 років тому +267

      not me. it was always the lady in the bathtub

    • @Jackmilfer
      @Jackmilfer 6 років тому +365

      for me it’s gotta be the guy in the dog costume.

    • @jerrygodeep4787
      @jerrygodeep4787 6 років тому +57

      Jack Miller that one was hilarious lol

    • @zoe2288
      @zoe2288 5 років тому +95

      Jack Miller those are called furries

    • @dashv2727
      @dashv2727 5 років тому +64

      Scariest part for me was the twins subliminal images and when they showed the twins chopped up

  • @wsingleton94
    @wsingleton94 5 років тому +3451

    Scariest part in that movie is finding out Red Rum means Murder backwards

    • @shawndurham297
      @shawndurham297 4 роки тому +220

      Bro, when I first watched this I was like WTF.

    • @Sunshine-pr4tu
      @Sunshine-pr4tu 4 роки тому +88

      Bro, I was scared just finding that out in the book lol

    • @trevorg6945
      @trevorg6945 4 роки тому +94

      im so mad that was spoiled for me before i watched the movie

    • @shawndurham297
      @shawndurham297 4 роки тому +93

      Trevor g your own fault for watching a movie explanation video before watching the movie 🤷🏽

    • @trevorg6945
      @trevorg6945 4 роки тому +75

      @@shawndurham297 lmao the video didn't spoil it its just an iconic part of the movie so I knew about it before watching

  • @AayushSapra
    @AayushSapra 3 роки тому +1141

    It's insane to think this story just randomly came to someone's mind. Kinda scary too.

    • @sarahgm8996
      @sarahgm8996 3 роки тому +84

      Not really. Stephen King was inspired by a hotel in the mountains in Colorado.

    • @BuddysPersonalAccount
      @BuddysPersonalAccount 3 роки тому +35

      Not really, I get really morbid story Ideas too. might say something about me though...

    • @xXDamolaXx
      @xXDamolaXx 3 роки тому +13

      @@BuddysPersonalAccount make a movie!

    • @Star-bp5jj
      @Star-bp5jj 2 роки тому

      The thing is these things are real. Too many real stories with supernatraul events.

    • @rayshalfalive
      @rayshalfalive 2 роки тому +5

      @@sarahgm8996 no he wasnt in the book the very first thing says many of the most beautiful hotels in the world are in colorado the overlook is inspired by none of them

  • @neoasura
    @neoasura 6 років тому +2652

    The fact this movie leaves a lot open to analysis and interpretation even 40 years later is a mark of a good film maker.

    • @OmfgHiii
      @OmfgHiii 5 років тому +84

      very ''vague'' movies tend to be classics because they're so vague people go mad over the theories, that sells, but it definitely is cool

    • @Miniver765
      @Miniver765 5 років тому +16

      @@OmfgHiii Seems like the producer of THIS video went mad inserting a lot of politically "correct" garbage I'm sure nobody was thinking of at the time this FILM was produced in 1979/80.

    • @smithb0134
      @smithb0134 4 роки тому +11

      Universities could offer a PHD program in “The Shinning” Studies considering all of the various interpretations and analysis threads that can be formulated. The film leaves an indelible impression on the viewer.

    • @psychosis345
      @psychosis345 4 роки тому +8

      @@Miniver765 No, Kubrick was fully intending to slip as many sumbliminal images as he could. Alot dealing with "politocal garbage"

    • @Miniver765
      @Miniver765 4 роки тому +2

      @@psychosis345 M'kay. Guess it comes down to perspective.

  • @thesecretrectangle
    @thesecretrectangle 6 років тому +1935

    theres no such thing as The Shining's ending explained.

    • @robertrodriguez787
      @robertrodriguez787 5 років тому +13

      It's a movie everyone knows it's not real . Dose every movie you watch have to be real .

    • @erikkillmonger3232
      @erikkillmonger3232 5 років тому +147

      @@robertrodriguez787 You missed what they were getting at.

    • @Max-le5ly
      @Max-le5ly 4 роки тому +14

      r/woooosh

    • @jessicadarby9199
      @jessicadarby9199 4 роки тому +3

      Dr sleep and the stand

    • @nataliemira2073
      @nataliemira2073 4 роки тому +11

      I was thining I must be dumb cuz I still don’t get it lol

  • @yashverma8878
    @yashverma8878 4 роки тому +1310

    The best thing about the movie is the boy cycling. That's so damn satisfying.

    • @psychosis345
      @psychosis345 4 роки тому +16

      And the villians in Doctor Sleep also "cycle"

    • @firhanhidayat2803
      @firhanhidayat2803 4 роки тому +129

      Yeah and the sound between the carpet and floor, very satisfaying

    • @mirrorvision8757
      @mirrorvision8757 4 роки тому +3

      I know ryt 😂

    • @elbowmacandcheese4768
      @elbowmacandcheese4768 3 роки тому +11

      @@firhanhidayat2803 yesss it’s just so many small details that give to mood of the film and that was one of the biggest things in my opinion

    • @boizebra
      @boizebra 3 роки тому +4

      Reminded me if an old cartoon named Bobby’s World!

  • @Raccoon-bones
    @Raccoon-bones 5 років тому +921

    *Overlook hotel yelp reviews*
    ⭐️
    There was a hole in my bathroom door - a concerned Karen
    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
    Great service from an employee that goes by the name Grady- a happy guest
    ⭐️⭐️
    I was locked in a pantry - Jack Torrance
    ⭐️
    There was a frozen body outside- one very concerned guest
    ⭐️⭐️
    I was traumatized but I got out of an abusive relationship - Wendy Torrance
    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
    Wonderful alcohol and lovely but kinda creepy bar tender - satisfied alcoholi- I mean guest
    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
    There were two British girls that came to greet me when I was walking to my room? -a very confused guest

    • @reginadavis4321
      @reginadavis4321 4 роки тому +17

      😂😂😂😂

    • @jaice8410
      @jaice8410 4 роки тому +18

      now THIS is hilarious 😂😅 and realistic 😱

    • @seanluzdeluna8153
      @seanluzdeluna8153 4 роки тому +10

      You sir are golden! 👍🏼🙌🏼 😁😂😂

    • @izzy9305
      @izzy9305 4 роки тому +26

      ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
      a naked woman joined me in the bathtub....

    • @Ciara1594
      @Ciara1594 4 роки тому +13

      ⭐ ⭐⭐ I saw two guests doing something in their bedroom (I don't what) one was wearing a doglike costume. Was there a masquerade party I wasn't told about? ---- Confused Guest

  • @debracostley9731
    @debracostley9731 5 років тому +739

    I think the picture is of the souls that the Overlook has taken.

    • @Stigmatix666
      @Stigmatix666 5 років тому +59

      Yup. That's exactly what happens. As the title of the scene is called in the dvd cover: "The Hotel Claims Jack".
      Easy-peasy.
      A little healthy, normal examination is usually in order before going full-blown tinfoilhat conspiarcy theorist..
      This movie isn't exactly rocket science, even though there are plenty of lunatics believing otherwise.
      How about this train of thought: "Hey, I'm gonna make a horror movie to mess with people's heads!"

    • @ltuck2345
      @ltuck2345 4 роки тому +23

      Why isn’t dick in the picture then?

    • @alfredino724
      @alfredino724 4 роки тому

      naw

    • @sinomino
      @sinomino 4 роки тому +6

      Ltuck 23 well the two little girls aren't in the picture either. So maybe it's not just about dying in the hotel 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @dhruvildesai6911
      @dhruvildesai6911 3 роки тому +4

      but why is it from 1921 then

  • @Luckylukeproduction
    @Luckylukeproduction 7 років тому +4378

    You know this movie is awesome if you're still talking about it 2017

    • @FeikNeyme
      @FeikNeyme 7 років тому +38

      you're*

    • @snapcase07
      @snapcase07 7 років тому +18

      Also, ScreenPrism's analysis is so much more coherent and watchable than that Room 237 documentary, which covers only the conspiratorial perspectives. Well done!

    • @99pedropotter
      @99pedropotter 7 років тому +1

      that as far as i know is a joke documentary, made to trick people into thinking it was real

    • @Nick-xb5nz
      @Nick-xb5nz 6 років тому +3

      Feik Neyme Grammar ploice?

    • @Breezy-bv9te
      @Breezy-bv9te 6 років тому +3

      Absolutely!!! One of my favorite classic thrillers!!!

  • @RealLukeWilson
    @RealLukeWilson 6 років тому +1718

    This disagreement between King and Kubrick in terms of the hotel burning v. freezing is interesting to me, as it seems to reflect the differences in interpretation of hell by Dante’s Inferno and Milton’s Paradise Lost. Dante’s hell burns, which is the more modern take; but Milton’s hell freezes.

    • @marcomiceli7743
      @marcomiceli7743 6 років тому +101

      Luke Wilson Dante's end layer of Hell is a frozen plane, consisting of frozen tears (sorrow).

    • @RealLukeWilson
      @RealLukeWilson 6 років тому +35

      Yeah, I'm aware of that. I guess that could mean that Kubrick wanted to highlight the final ring of hell, too, but because it's Kubrick it could very well be both or neither or drawing from a completely different influence.

    • @patricktilton5377
      @patricktilton5377 6 років тому +8

      Hah! I had paused this video for a moment and written my reply to Luke Wilson's comment . . . then resumed watching the video and BANG ZOOM, there it is, a mention of Theseus and the Minotaur! One comment, though: that Gustave Dore illustration from Dante's Inferno is of Minos, the Judge of the Damned, and not of the Minotaur.

    • @g13n79
      @g13n79 5 років тому +2

      Someone always has to bring up Dante.
      Zzzzzzz

    • @redpillpharmacy6877
      @redpillpharmacy6877 5 років тому

      Milton was a stinking Protestant. Milton loses.

  • @paulaharrisbaca4851
    @paulaharrisbaca4851 6 років тому +596

    "You are the caretaker here. You've always been the caretaker, sir...."

  • @WeeabossVA
    @WeeabossVA 4 роки тому +442

    "The hotel's destructive cycle may be broken"
    *laughs in Doctor Sleep*

    • @rubie7081
      @rubie7081 4 роки тому +1

      @aiyaash-billa Damn

    • @lunabangtan7
      @lunabangtan7 4 роки тому

      aiyaash-billa In the book? Pretty sure that isn’t what happens.

    • @IDontCare39
      @IDontCare39 4 роки тому

      @@lunabangtan7 you've read iy? What happens

    • @lunabangtan7
      @lunabangtan7 4 роки тому +1

      lilaaa x Since in the book Danny does burn down the hotel when he was younger he doesn’t need to all that sacrifice stuff as an adult. He simply meets up with Rose at the spot where the hotel once stood and with help of his fathers spirit pushes her off the cliff where she dies slowly. His father soul finally rests and Dan has a happy life afterwards.

    • @psychosis345
      @psychosis345 4 роки тому

      @@lunabangtan7 He doesn't burn it down. It blows up from a bad boiler

  • @charallsbrook9001
    @charallsbrook9001 5 років тому +218

    Can’t believe she didn’t point out that Danny says “red rum” over and over for the alcohol example

    • @anishmistry4583
      @anishmistry4583 4 роки тому +13

      that's a pretty good analogy! Now it makes it more creepier...

    • @k3nz1e73
      @k3nz1e73 4 роки тому

      Murder murder murder murder murder murder murder

  • @Alessandro_da_Rimini
    @Alessandro_da_Rimini 6 років тому +636

    "You have always been the caretaker" for me it refers to his reincarnated spirit in a cursed and haunted place where bad things happened and were repeating again and again . Jack in fact speaks about deja vu'.

    • @billybigbollocks6991
      @billybigbollocks6991 5 років тому +2

      That's exactly what she said.

    • @waaywavyme
      @waaywavyme 4 роки тому +1

      Sandro da Rimini are you dumb she literally says this foo ! 😂😂😂

    • @kentclark6420
      @kentclark6420 4 роки тому +1

      Not Jack's spirit. His spirit was in his body at the time of the 1970 murders by Charles Grady. It was the Native American soul/demon that possessed Grady and Jack.

    • @aaronleev
      @aaronleev 4 роки тому +3

      @@kentclark6420 The "always" part could be misleading, it can mean one of two things, always meaning hes a reincarnation or in the timeline of things he was always meant to be the caretaker. God is to see everything that has and hasn't he is not bound by time, so progression of time is irrelevant because it has already happened, will always happen, and is happening, he is always the caretaker.

    • @sepultura7771
      @sepultura7771 2 роки тому

      So he’s trapped in an endless cycle of hell

  • @poundofflesh4642
    @poundofflesh4642 5 років тому +549

    Kubrick was never one to spoon feed emotions to his audience. Everything is up for interpretation. Having said that, what bothers me about the reincarnation angle is if Jack has “Always been the caretaker” of The Overlook since 1921 at least, how come he didn’t know his way through the hedge maze?
    I think Jack Torrence was just a man with protruding character flaws which left his soul vulnerable to the dark malevolent demonic forces lurking throughout the hotel. He had a drinking problem which manifested into violence against his own son which in turn manifests into guilt. Also he was a struggling writer who took on teaching jobs “To make ends meet.” In short, a failed husband and father. These vulnerabilities opened the door to the dark forces who manipulated him.
    Jack is just a consolation prize. Danny is the real object of desire. The hotel wants Danny because he has “A great talent.” Holloran has the shinning too but he’s too old and wise to be manipulated. With Danny however we have a child traumatized by the things Tony shows him and this makes him vulnerable. Fortunately Holloran assures Danny that the shinning is a gift, not a curse, then warns him by establishing boundaries (room 237). Ironically, the hotel ends up taking Holloran in the end.
    The only character not affected by the hotel at first is Wendy. Why? Because she is level headed with no glaring character flaws. We really don’t know much about her so she has no vulnerabilities. It’s only after her husband becomes homicidal and Tony possesses Danny that she breaks down. And that’s when the dark forces make their move: “Great party isn’t it,” dog costume, lounging skeletons, and blood-filled elevators.
    As for the 1921 photo, I think of it as a “Wall of Fame” in the halls of Hell. Look at our proud collection of souls we collected over the years. Look at all the fun we’re having. Come join us. Wouldn’t you rather party in Hell than serve in Heaven?

    • @Bob-eo3gf
      @Bob-eo3gf 4 роки тому +36

      You are an educated person.

    • @ardidenavi
      @ardidenavi 4 роки тому +14

      I love everything about this.

    • @aurora7442
      @aurora7442 4 роки тому +16

      That's a really clever interpretation!

    • @notyet3dna
      @notyet3dna 4 роки тому +2

      period

    • @Ciara1594
      @Ciara1594 4 роки тому +5

      Come to the Dark Side where all the fun stuff happens

  • @knight.99
    @knight.99 5 років тому +433

    That's the genius of Kubrick that we're still debating it after 40 years

    • @wtfyoutube4873
      @wtfyoutube4873 4 роки тому +10

      A movie being confusing is what makes a bad movie.

    • @TheLudwigWan
      @TheLudwigWan 4 роки тому +13

      @@wtfyoutube4873 it is hard to use your brain, isn't it?

    • @kattycatkat4086
      @kattycatkat4086 4 роки тому +5

      I can't believe hitler just roasted him lmao.

    • @wtfyoutube4873
      @wtfyoutube4873 4 роки тому +1

      Adolf Hitler mind the gap

    • @Tesseract9630
      @Tesseract9630 4 роки тому

      No it's because it is stupid and there is no answer to stupidity

  • @GiantPetRat
    @GiantPetRat 6 років тому +179

    There's one thing that's always bugged me about the idea of Jack Torrence already having evil tendencies, or lack of connection to his family before coming to the Overlook, and that's the scene when he has that terrible nightmare at his desk. He wakes up, clearly terrified of the visions of himself hurting his wife and son. He's even weeping, he's so distraught at the idea of harming his family. That alone seems to starkly contrast with his behavior in the rest of the film.

    • @Haddley333
      @Haddley333 2 роки тому +1

      Possessed maybe? Or went absolutely crazy?

    • @hastekulvaati9681
      @hastekulvaati9681 2 роки тому +41

      I think that works because not every abuser is happy about what they do. I suspect a lot of them actually hate themselves for it. An inability to control your emotions is a profound weakness. It is a shameful thing for a man.
      Jack is profoundly upset because he knows it could happen. Not every abuser is a psychopath or a sociopath… they just lack the ability to curb their worst instincts under profound or prolonged periods or stress. Once they calm down from their anger ‘high’ they must face what they have done. It’s not pretty.
      They are to be pitied in some ways…just not as much as the people they impose themselves upon.

    • @Boss-cj6zn
      @Boss-cj6zn Рік тому +2

      Right? During that scene I was half expecting him to turn and become vile to Wendy as he was weeping. I feel like if Kubric wrote Jack to be a better man before Outlook, the initial reactions would be better

    • @raddle8516
      @raddle8516 Рік тому +1

      It could be that he has bipolar disorder. (Also, I love how the actual comment was 4y ago but the replies vary. Kinda ironic with the movie lol.)

    • @theotherchrispaul812
      @theotherchrispaul812 Рік тому +1

      He could also be putting on an act to give himself an alibi. Someone just got done choking Danny, and I think it was Jack. Wendy says Danny blames a woman in room 237 but Jack says he didn't see anyone in the room after checking it. You would think after his encounter with the hag, Jack would confirm Danny's story to at least some extent but he doesn't at all. He instead comes up with this insane theory that Danny did it to himself. I think the scene with Jack in Room 237 was another hallucination of his and he doesn't want to reveal that to Wendy. Danny probably knew what was in room 237 (it's like pictures in a book Danny, it isn't real) and lied to Wendy to protect his father. Kids with an abusive parent will often lie to protect themselves out of fear of reprisals (especially when they are secluded like this). Jack's little "dream" is also geared towards garnering sympathy with Wendy (how could he ever hurt his own family boo hoo hoo). Jack needs sympathy points now knowing Wendy will eventually want to know what happened to Danny.

  • @dylantrott18
    @dylantrott18 6 років тому +384

    Sad enough that poor Wendy was married to Jack.

    • @roshieawed2903
      @roshieawed2903 4 роки тому +3

      Mmmmhm

    • @deed2157
      @deed2157 3 роки тому +50

      Seems like Jack hated her and just tolerated her. Makes me feel like he married her bec she got pregnant. There's a part in the movie where he tells her he didnt see lady in room 347. Wendy then says they should leave for Dannys sake and he says"you've f*$& up my life already and you're not gonna do it again"

    • @darkangel13915
      @darkangel13915 3 роки тому +19

      @@deed2157 That shit struck me the most. I really felt horrible for her. But I’m glad she was able to escape in the end with Danny

  • @MrHeadbanger366
    @MrHeadbanger366 6 років тому +244

    As I recall from the book, the more Jack drank, the more control the ghosts within the hotel had over him.

  • @rexlongfellow
    @rexlongfellow 7 років тому +1596

    Stanley Kubrick is a genius.

    • @sleepingsnorlax9948
      @sleepingsnorlax9948 6 років тому +2

      Rex Longfellow I agree

    • @manuelortmann
      @manuelortmann 6 років тому +19

      Of course but Christopher Nolan is one of the Genius now

    • @AA-ke5cu
      @AA-ke5cu 6 років тому +13

      Rex Longfellow Stanley Kubrick was a genius, he is dead,most likely murdered.

    • @SutekhTheDestroyer
      @SutekhTheDestroyer 6 років тому +10

      *was

    • @StevieStitches
      @StevieStitches 6 років тому +73

      Stanley Kubrick died of a heartache in 1999. He was 70 years old and he was famously overweight. Of course conspiracy enthusiast fans love to make a dramatic murder mystery out of his death because the great genius couldn't have died of such boring natural causes like a human being does, right.

  • @joshuakingsley5293
    @joshuakingsley5293 6 років тому +143

    Maybe Jack is stuck in some kind of purgatory and has been stuck in that cycle since the 1920's. Maybe "Jack" really is the Grady guy. And each time he goes through the "cycle" as a different person and will be stuck in this cycle until he finally "learns his lesson". So in other words, the entire film is Jack's/Grady's purgatory.

    • @webtoonanime4940
      @webtoonanime4940 4 роки тому +1

      thats what i thought

    • @tooleyheadbang4239
      @tooleyheadbang4239 4 роки тому +1

      @@webtoonanime4940 No Popery!

    • @arcticwind1368
      @arcticwind1368 3 роки тому +6

      Or maybe everything we see is the novel jack is writing

    • @OrangeJungle
      @OrangeJungle 3 роки тому +3

      Yesss i was looking for someone who said this

    • @matthewb.7172
      @matthewb.7172 11 місяців тому

      It vaguely reminded me of the dark comedy, Groundhog Day. He won’t escape the cycle until he can resist falling into the temptations of the ghosts of the hotel.

  • @weknowriri
    @weknowriri 4 роки тому +228

    Jack and his family stayed in quarantine before it was cool.

    • @jenitj180
      @jenitj180 2 роки тому +3

      The irony is that they even had all the resources

  • @GackleBlax
    @GackleBlax 5 років тому +440

    Jack's last thought was something along the lines of:
    "They got out. Oh, thank god, they got out."
    The most moving part of the book, and a perfect example of why the movie (though frikkin awesome) misses the point. The movie version of JT wouldn't have had those been his last thoughts.

    • @DerMoerpler
      @DerMoerpler 4 роки тому +69

      I don't think the movie is missing the point but rather consciously makes a different one. Both the movie and the book work in their own way. I don't know if a straight adaption would have worked as well as Kubricks, because (if I recall correctly, it's been a few years since I last read the book) Kings version relies a lot more on the inner life of the characters, which is harder to pull off visually.

    • @armitanatura7305
      @armitanatura7305 3 роки тому +15

      Hi ! I don’t believe the movie is missing the point. I believe Kubrick was inspired by the movie to make his own point, like he’s done in clockwork orange. Kubrick gets inspired by books however makes his own points and lessons. Hope that explained a bit

    • @thatgirlreacts5465
      @thatgirlreacts5465 3 роки тому +6

      I don’t think Kubrick missed the point at all. I think he changed the point and made this story his own.

    • @GackleBlax
      @GackleBlax 3 роки тому +4

      @@thatgirlreacts5465 ​ @Armita Natura @Tim
      You're all right, and i was wrong.
      Not sarcasm, just to be clear.
      Kubrick is obviously quite smart, so the point of it wasn't lost on him. I'm just kind of a sap, and i like a message that's a little more hopeful. Kubricks work is great, i even really like A Clockwork Orange, but it's doesn't really leave me with a good feeling. As someone with depression, i have a tendency to feel everything is hopeless and painful. Movie, games, books etc. that tell me that life is beautiful and the struggles we all go through are worth it, are what i the world needs. Or maybe just me. But definitely me.

  • @jerric1228
    @jerric1228 6 років тому +516

    When you learn about King’s past, particularly battles with addiction, it’s not hard to see why me made jack sympathetic and particularly didn’t like how Kubrick made him more evil. A part of king wants to remove the agency of his past and the harm he likely inflicted on his own son because for him it felt like possession, but Kubrick presents this as an outsider seeing a man harm his family and that’s why King sees it as “cold”.
    The same thing can be said about “IT” in the way that you could make that whole movie about bad childhoods and sexual abuse of you reveal at the end that there was no supernatural force and the children imagined it as such because you can’t battle a society that looks the other way when a bully is beating the shit out of you, but blame it all on a monster and maybe you can kill the monster.

    • @ModernPlague
      @ModernPlague 5 років тому +18

      Good points. This sort of interpretive perspective can also be applied to some of the works of director David Lynch.

  • @levon8238
    @levon8238 7 років тому +1376

    Wtf I literally just watched this movie again like 10minutes ago

    • @D2016-1
      @D2016-1 7 років тому +25

      Same shit I watched it like 3 hours ago hahaha

    • @timrthoward7007
      @timrthoward7007 7 років тому +35

      You're in a simulation

    • @norgepalm7315
      @norgepalm7315 7 років тому +7

      Kelpy G wake up

    • @asapluke
      @asapluke 7 років тому

      Kelpy G I saw it on wednesday

    • @smafiaasd3924
      @smafiaasd3924 6 років тому

      Kelpy G same

  • @modder1975
    @modder1975 4 роки тому +154

    At the end he's clearly became part of the hotel's ghosts.

  • @andrewashford291
    @andrewashford291 5 років тому +72

    Just saw this for the first time on Netflix. Been so aware of the "Here's Johnny!" phrase yet never seen the movie up to know. I was so confused at the end, glad I found this video.

    • @MrPhantom95
      @MrPhantom95 4 роки тому +1

      veronica carlson He just said he did?

    • @carlcapture
      @carlcapture Рік тому

      Wiz Khalifa used "Here's Johnny" line in "Goodbye".

  • @Stray7
    @Stray7 5 років тому +49

    "How do you like it, Marge? All it needs is a title. I was thinking along the lines of 'no tv and no beer make Homer something something.'"
    "Go crazy?"
    "Don't mind if I do!"

  • @laurenbi
    @laurenbi 7 років тому +306

    Omg, my professor was telling me today that she saw this movie in theaters and her entire family was out of town, so she was alone in her large old house in the middle of nowhere, Texas completely alone. And she wasn’t able to sleep for TWO DAYS bc of how bad it fucked her up. 😂👌🏼

    • @robertrodriguez787
      @robertrodriguez787 5 років тому +9

      My mother was also scared when she saw the movie . She was alone and it started snowing like in the shinning so that scared her more .

    • @dwoollery
      @dwoollery 5 років тому +8

      I'm 37 yrs old and I saw this movie for the 1st time yesterday. I slept with my lights on in my bedroom last night. I don't scare easily.

    • @dwoollery
      @dwoollery 5 років тому +2

      @@Rosegold90 I would burn the whole house down.

    • @cosmicrider1751
      @cosmicrider1751 5 років тому +9

      It isn’t scary at all though..?

    • @Hellenicheavymetal
      @Hellenicheavymetal 5 років тому +3

      Dunno if scary is the right word more like creepy as hell

  • @pablo27930
    @pablo27930 7 років тому +109

    Hands down this is one of the best films ever made.I first watched it when I was around 13 and even now at the age of 37 when I watch this film I am still ingrosed in it.

    • @Elena-er7zp
      @Elena-er7zp 6 років тому +4

      mr offkey marc I first saw this film at the theater at age 4. Guess my parents couldn't bother with a babysitter. Of course, I could not follow the story, but certain images are scarred into my brain tissue and I have had an abject terror of this film my entire life. I had nightmares for years. I hate huge hotels. I hate patterned carpets. And have genuinely hated all of Kubrick's films because of it. They all give me nightmares because well Kubrick's work is so distinct. I've tried throughout the years to face my deeply bedded irrational fear of this movie by approaching it logically. It kinda works. I'm determined to watch it again, but really fear what this will to do my psychology. In short, I saw this film too young and it fucked me up.

    • @sandraruiz2212
      @sandraruiz2212 6 років тому

      Me too! I've watched it so many times I can't even count!

    • @lfcforever1482
      @lfcforever1482 4 роки тому

      @Mooky Blaylock do you not like The Shining or something, if so why are you here? It's one of the greatest films of all time imo, and definitely one of the greatest horror films.

  • @vb2388
    @vb2388 7 років тому +823

    The greatest horror film of all time...imo

    • @you-know-who5972
      @you-know-who5972 7 років тому +94

      his opinion is on point.

    • @you-know-who5972
      @you-know-who5972 7 років тому +55

      ok so tell me what some good ones are?

    • @Siluvian
      @Siluvian 6 років тому +48

      exactly he cant

    • @nishanpaudel3960
      @nishanpaudel3960 6 років тому +7

      the best horror movie which is not even horror. Stephen King is a king of writing novellas

    • @lujbel6043
      @lujbel6043 6 років тому +26

      This film isnt scary so i wouldn't call it a horror film

  • @dalee72
    @dalee72 2 роки тому +18

    The line that Jack said to Lloyd the hotel bartender "Here's to 5 months of misery and all the irreparable harm that's caused me." was his way of projecting and scapegoating his family. His addiction caused them misery and irreparable harm.

  • @burner1517
    @burner1517 5 років тому +11

    When the cook got there, it showed him walking away from the snowcat. I thought, "I'm going to be so disappointed if this is just used as an excuse to give them a vehicle to escape in." Boom, the cook instantly dies and the only thing he was good for was delivering the snowcat. I was most disappointed indeed.

  • @AR-kh6rr
    @AR-kh6rr 7 років тому +839

    This is the best analysis of The Shining I’ve ever seen.

    • @jeffwalker6815
      @jeffwalker6815 7 років тому +22

      I agree, it stuck to the facts and didn't dish out the conspiracy theories. I actually agree with everything said for once..

    • @joeneway
      @joeneway 6 років тому +5

      Then you havent seen the one where its shown that Jack going crazy etc is just the character in HIS NOVEL...the original Grady had daughters age 8 and 10 not twins and their names are different Delbert and Charles Grady...all the subtle differences from real life to novel are there for the sharp eyes...during his interview he was given the idea for his novel and we then see it played out

    • @mazzknight2196
      @mazzknight2196 6 років тому +3

      JoeyMunson ... spot on

    • @lefcoinc1
      @lefcoinc1 6 років тому +2

      What video game Dunkeys review of the shining

    • @jaydean8843
      @jaydean8843 6 років тому +2

      Not the best analysis but lacking.

  • @Margatatials
    @Margatatials 6 років тому +138

    Maybe the twins aren't Charles Grady's daughters, we are told earlier in the film that the daughters were different ages but the girls seem to be twins, maybe they are the original murderous caretakers daughters or some other earlier murder, the girls dresses could easily be from a more historical period than merely the previous caretaker,

    • @DeejayNally
      @DeejayNally 5 років тому +2

      They are meant to be clones

    • @PR7-82
      @PR7-82 3 роки тому

      @veronica carlson I had never heard the term Irish twins so I googled it. Going down the rabbit 🐇 hole 🕳 discovering new terminology I realise that my sister and I were Catholic twins because we were a year apart

    • @mikshinee87
      @mikshinee87 3 роки тому

      @veronica carlson Well I never knew a youtube comment can teach me something, thanks! Irish twins indeed. Though I guess it's non-PC today. 🤔

  • @austinsop7434
    @austinsop7434 7 років тому +79

    Once I learned more about the novel, I always saw the film as, not just a departure, but almost a deliberate reflection of the novel. So many small details in the film are reflected as the opposite of the novel. Even the color of the car being switched with the color of the snow-plow. Very interesting film. So much detail and symbolism put into it.

  • @HoonAgain
    @HoonAgain 4 роки тому +47

    “Light of my life.
    Wendy! I’m not gonna hurt cha.
    I’m just BASH your brains in.”
    (Some of the best words uttered on screen EVER)

    • @ohshait175
      @ohshait175 4 роки тому +1

      "Im gonna bash 'em right the fuck in"

  • @QaDri93
    @QaDri93 6 років тому +90

    I just watched it on Netflix and noticed that some scenes were missing? Fuuuck
    Edit: Netflix probably had a cut version...there’s definitely scenes missing....aaaaaargh

    • @jameslyddall
      @jameslyddall 5 років тому +3

      qadri rulzdood there’s a good British guy who has explained this film is about sexual abuse and Jack sexually abuses Danny.

    • @ceecie5776
      @ceecie5776 5 років тому +3

      james lyddall who? sounds interesting

    • @sarahwilliams8482
      @sarahwilliams8482 5 років тому

      james lyddall wait, whaat?

    • @leopoldbuttersstotch277
      @leopoldbuttersstotch277 3 роки тому

      The version on Netflix is the British version, which is around 2 hours while the American cut is around 144 mins

  • @BlacKnightRising
    @BlacKnightRising 6 років тому +260

    I always got that impression that Jack was a reincarnated character, repeating a cycle of violence, over and over again....Mr. Grady said as much to him in the bathroom,
    'I have always been here, (at the hotel) he said, 'you are the caretaker, you've always been the caretaker'
    that was some pretty scary shit right there, a true horror-movie classic like no other....
    the words 'all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy' that Jack's been typing all along, showing that Jack's been 'taken' by the hotel again, was truly frightening, you don't need gore to achieve that just the right setting/music/atmosphere, Wendy's horror etched in her face at looking at the same sentence over and over again was awesome in it's scope conveying it....just a fantastic piece of horror genre

  • @timgraysontv
    @timgraysontv 6 років тому +3016

    THIS IS HOW MANY PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR TRUMP!
    👇

    • @soulofangel1990
      @soulofangel1990 5 років тому +8

      ** i hear

    • @ThaloniusPFunk
      @ThaloniusPFunk 5 років тому +156

      @meow bastard All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. No play and all work makes Jack a dull boy. All boy and no Jack makes work a dull play. All work and no Jack makes boy a dull play. All Jack and no dull makes boy a work play.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy (All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy).
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy: All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

    • @TheLJShow-ys8wr
      @TheLJShow-ys8wr 5 років тому +23

      @@ThaloniusPFunk
      How do you like it honey?

    • @lushbear04_old
      @lushbear04_old 5 років тому +3

      For real lmao

    • @FlashwingthePony
      @FlashwingthePony 5 років тому +21

      Thalonius P. Funk glad to know how your stay at the overlook hotel went

  • @belladonna4765
    @belladonna4765 7 років тому +216

    I love how you analyze every part of film because I would never notice the details and I see how it relates to violence in that is exist whether though History or U.S. Your UA-cam Channel is Amazing.

  • @MyLordexe
    @MyLordexe 4 роки тому +196

    anyone in quarantine loosing their mind yet?

  • @artbygabe
    @artbygabe 5 років тому +38

    Jack: I'm not going to hurt ya. You didn't let me finish my sentence! I said, have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight!!

  • @GerryBolger
    @GerryBolger 7 років тому +758

    Did anyone read Dr Sleep? It's a fairly new sequel to The Shining and it's excellent. It would make a great movie..

    • @luizeduardo1357
      @luizeduardo1357 7 років тому +88

      I've just finished it, and it's a very good book! However, it has a very different atmosphere when compared to The Shining. For me, it felt more like a action/thriller than the horror we find in The Shining! Nevertheless, it would be awesome to watch a movie based on it!

    • @nathanbeer3338
      @nathanbeer3338 7 років тому +20

      GerryBolger It's my first Stephen King novel I've read (yeah I read Doctor Sleep before The Shining), now I hardly remember what happened in that book despite of the characters: Abra, Danny (Dan) and Rose from the True Knot.

    • @recamacadato
      @recamacadato 6 років тому +5

      Definitely!!!

    • @sleepingsnorlax9948
      @sleepingsnorlax9948 6 років тому +4

      GerryBolger I have and it’s amazing!

    • @johnnyelbowsiowa
      @johnnyelbowsiowa 6 років тому +26

      I heard that there's a Doctor Sleep movie in development right now

  • @rmd1743
    @rmd1743 7 років тому +24

    The more I see their videos, the more I start to think that Screenprism is my favourite channel on UA-cam. Please continue to make these videos

  • @crozraven
    @crozraven 7 років тому +447

    Need more Kubrick's movie analysis. I propose Full Metal Jacket for next.

    • @misterjester7111
      @misterjester7111 7 років тому +2

      Yes Please

    • @anthonystauffer9278
      @anthonystauffer9278 7 років тому +3

      Croz Raven I only liked the first half of the movie

    • @ScarceTuber
      @ScarceTuber 7 років тому +9

      Pls, Dr. Strangelove

    • @bingerz237
      @bingerz237 7 років тому +3

      I propose Killer's Kiss, or The Killing, or To Kill or Kill Not.

    • @iinmediasres4938
      @iinmediasres4938 7 років тому +5

      I vote for 2001: A Space Odyssey, personally :)

  • @Rosie-ij3on
    @Rosie-ij3on 5 років тому +47

    I adore Jack Nicholson, what a legend. Love him

  • @mallorie1916
    @mallorie1916 4 роки тому +6

    Anybody else agree that Kubrick is the king of cliffhangers at the end. Leaving us to interpret our personal meanings. I think the real true talent from a producer/writer giving us the choice to come to our own conclusions. Love that! I could watch movies over and over and reach my interpretation, but find another meaning!

  • @mikebush5802
    @mikebush5802 6 років тому +260

    Does Alcoholism have anything to do with the 1920s prohibition? Especially since the photograph was during the 1920s.

    • @LordZontar
      @LordZontar 6 років тому +20

      Prohibition didn't really impede the rich from being able to get their alcohol in any amount at any time.

    • @dreyadumas438
      @dreyadumas438 5 років тому +5

      I wondered that also...since at the beginning it was said there is none there...so it could be the last party before the prohibition

    • @OmfgHiii
      @OmfgHiii 5 років тому +5

      @@dreyadumas438 they said they store the alcohol away in their off seasons everytime not that they'll just stop having it

    • @fatdaddyeddiejr
      @fatdaddyeddiejr 5 років тому +2

      Wine and champagne were not outlawed during prohibition.

    • @jimmu8689
      @jimmu8689 5 років тому +4

      Mike Bush the overlook is literally hell, jack says he’d give his soul for another drink but after he fails he’s stuck in the 1920s with no liquor in the prohibition

  • @jamestulk5111
    @jamestulk5111 6 років тому +27

    There are countless analysis videos on The Shining on UA-cam, But you are the only one to hit the nail on he head. I'm sure this is exactly what Kubrick intended. You always have to figure it out yourself, like in 2001. This is why Kubrick is the greatest director of all time bar none.

  • @mrs.hopwinkle6034
    @mrs.hopwinkle6034 4 роки тому +103

    "He's all aggression, stress and angst, and that's all he offers the family." I think it makes the story a disservice to reduce Jack to a one-dimensional villain. It's far scarier to imagine someone who's a good person deep down falling prey to the power of the hotel.

    • @2020history
      @2020history 4 роки тому +11

      Mrs. Hopwinkle but he still gives that illusion. You can tell he was off and a little angry but was trying to be a good person. Such as not drinking after he hurt Danny but before he snapped I got the sense he never liked Danny and was forced to because that was his son. He was human so he tried but the ghosts in the hotel tipped him over.

    • @mrs.hopwinkle6034
      @mrs.hopwinkle6034 4 роки тому +12

      @@2020history That's what I mean, though. I adore the movie, I truly do, but I think the movie fails in that regard. Jack never hated Danny. He loves Danny, and has a strong desire to be a good husband and father. That's what makes the story so terrifying, that despite Jack's love for his family, he's still corrupted by the hotel.

    • @2020history
      @2020history 4 роки тому +1

      Mrs. Hopwinkle yea that’s true. Makes it even more scarier because he was corrupted by the house but unfortunately not all movies do the books justice 😢

    • @Rezenbekk
      @Rezenbekk 4 роки тому +5

      Well, it's two fundamentally different stories, the one which blames all the problems on the outside forces ("it's not me hitting my son, it's the alcohol, poor me"), and the one which does not let the protagonist off the hook for his choices.

    • @gcannon12
      @gcannon12 4 роки тому +4

      Interesting, I lean in the opposite direction: I find the idea of a person trying to be good but who has seriously deep flaws that can surface & be exploited scarier than a “good person” falling victim to an evil force. I guess for me the former sounds more grounded in reality than the latter, which makes it more unsettling. People have inner demons and destructive, selfish tendencies... so the idea that those flaws will overwhelm and consume someone trying to be good (especially a FATHER & HUSBAND) is frankly terrifying.

  • @plaguedoctormasque8089
    @plaguedoctormasque8089 4 роки тому +29

    Stanley Kubrick was so hard on Shelley Duvall Jack's wife while filming The Shining he caused her to have a mental breakdown that's why you didn't see her in the movies we're so long the poor thing is a complete basket case thank you Kubrick

    • @LS-vu3yq
      @LS-vu3yq 4 роки тому +3

      Leafy IsHere it’s true tho

  • @that_goth_bitch3899
    @that_goth_bitch3899 5 років тому +8

    I my self, as a recovering addict, (clean and Serene since June 10th 2017😀) can absolutely attest to the alcohol theory. Although my D.O.C was alcohol AND heroin addiction is addiction. And one thing about addiction is that it turns you into a monster. It takes away the emotional and civilized side of us as human beings and turns us into animals. Relying and surviving on animalistic behavior and in doing so drastically and SEVERELY destroying the loved ones in your life. The effects that addiction can leave on the loved ones of the addict can be irreparable and devastating. Also, unfortunately most people lose their battle with addiction and die Young as jack does. His family lives on, while still traumatized, but still they carry on. But, addiction kills the addict and leaves the loved ones alive to suffer but leaving them alive non the less.

  • @armanimiller
    @armanimiller 6 років тому +66

    hey! I just noticed jack has the same hairstyle as penywize 2017!!

  • @webby256
    @webby256 7 років тому +309

    He reminds me of Trevor of gta 5

    • @juanmartin6710
      @juanmartin6710 5 років тому +17

      Trevor can wear the same sweater as jack, also it's called overlooked sweater or something like that

    • @AdoreYouInAshXI
      @AdoreYouInAshXI 5 років тому +1

      Overlooked sweater? Lol, never heard of that.

    • @bigcrackrock
      @bigcrackrock 5 років тому +1

      @@juanmartin6710 It's clearly not the same sweater.

    • @thisaccountsucks5556
      @thisaccountsucks5556 5 років тому +2

      I was about to say the same thing. The last movie clip in this video really reminded me of Trevor Philips from GTA V.

    • @emilygamet8847
      @emilygamet8847 5 років тому +2

      oh my god my friends told me I was stupid for thinking that

  • @jacobfranklin2199
    @jacobfranklin2199 7 років тому +162

    This movie is the greatest horror film of all time!!

    • @loayprettyboy206
      @loayprettyboy206 6 років тому +3

      I agree

    • @tounsi_m7ashesh
      @tounsi_m7ashesh 5 років тому +4

      Gaming Gnomes the thing and nightmare on elm street would like to have a word with you

    • @rhiannon5649
      @rhiannon5649 5 років тому +2

      @@tounsi_m7ashesh the thing was bs and to be honest nightmare on elm street was rather boring

    • @tounsi_m7ashesh
      @tounsi_m7ashesh 5 років тому +1

      @@rhiannon5649 would you please elaborate on your statement

    • @rhiannon5649
      @rhiannon5649 5 років тому +1

      @@tounsi_m7ashesh well the thing about "the thing" is that in my opinion the story is just bullshit. And it was really disgusting... but maybe I think that cause I dislike science fiction horror movies (mostly including aliens) and think they are just boring and repetitive and disgusting. And as I said to be honest I think nightmare on elm street is really boring. The story is pretty good but I just think that the movie is boring. But I guess everyone has a different taste. I'm more into psychological horror movies or thrillers.

  • @jooliagoolia9959
    @jooliagoolia9959 Рік тому +15

    A theory about how Jack gets out of the storage room is that there is a set of doors behind the shelves where Jack is sitting and hears Grady's voice.
    Jack hears and sees Grady when looking into mirrors and reflective surfaces. He's actually talking with himself.

    • @stevestars303
      @stevestars303 Рік тому +1

      But Grady physically opens the cooler pantry door. Jack appears in the last photograph. Jack isn't talking to the mirror. He sees himself and Grady (the former caretaker) there together. I think the theme of the film is that the Ghosts and murderous hauntings are REAL. That is what makes the Shining so scary. The concept even scares Stanley Kubrick, and Danny's fears are his too. Kubrick knows and has seen too much!

    • @jooliagoolia9959
      @jooliagoolia9959 Рік тому +1

      @@stevestars303 The theory I mentioned came from the documentary Room 237. Have you seen it?? 😀

    • @jooliagoolia9959
      @jooliagoolia9959 Рік тому

      @@stevestars303 And I'll add my personal fan theory no one mentions is Allllll the black and white photos are all the ghosts still there haunting. So my theory aligns with yours.
      There's also a theory that Danny or Wendy is making it all happen to get rid of Jack in their current situation.

    • @stevestars303
      @stevestars303 Рік тому +1

      @@jooliagoolia9959 I think I saw the 237 documentary but I may have to review it again. Most of the film Kubrick made were actually about the same theme. Insane and deviant controllers who manipulate peons below them, even to killing.

  • @mdgraystone
    @mdgraystone 5 років тому +19

    Yeah Steven King's version would have gone direct to video vs. Kubrick's iconic blockbuster and one of the greatest horror films of all time.

    • @clarkterrell930
      @clarkterrell930 5 років тому +2

      That TV movie he did was 1/10 as good as Kubrick's version. And that's being generous.

  • @lanaalba8392
    @lanaalba8392 7 років тому +407

    Is the one dislike from Stephen King himself!? :)

    • @jamespallord6604
      @jamespallord6604 6 років тому +5

      Why would he dislike it?

    • @AnneLien1987
      @AnneLien1987 6 років тому +17

      he hated the movie!

    • @ibkristykat
      @ibkristykat 6 років тому +2

      304 dislikes as of 8/20/2018 :)

    • @ThaloniusPFunk
      @ThaloniusPFunk 5 років тому +16

      @@AnneLien1987 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. No play and all work makes Jack a dull boy. All boy and no Jack makes work a dull play. All work and no Jack makes boy a dull play. All Jack and no dull makes boy a work play.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy (All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy).
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
      All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy: All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

    • @kieranstark7213
      @kieranstark7213 5 років тому +3

      Speaking of which...
      There are haters that made me believe I look like a "FAKE-ASS STEPHEN KING". Hell no, THEY do. Ex: Thiti2000, who will soon die like Jack Torrence in the frigid wintry outdoors.

  • @windowsgebruiker6631
    @windowsgebruiker6631 6 років тому +58

    For me, The Shining is an excellent film and one of my favourites, but comparing it to the source material is a little too apples to oranges. They are wholly different creatures, and each has its own merits, flaws, and insights. Without rehashing what others have already pointed out, I think one of the few things the movie really stumbled on was the reduction of Wendy. In the novel she is a truly three dimensional women, haunted by her childhood and experiences with her mother, and an active participant in the story whereas the film's Wendy is more akin to a bystander or audience surrogate.

    • @Nocturnalux
      @Nocturnalux 5 років тому +6

      I completely agree, especially when it comes to Wendy. In the novel Wendy goes as far as to give Jack an ultimatum, long before the Overlook even became a possibility: this caretaker hotel job is Jack's final strike. If he does not shape up she will leave him and take Denny with her. The way she comes to this decision is something the reader gets to experience for themselves and shows that Wendy is perfectly capable to being more than the tag-along wife.
      Wendy's love for Jack is also much more present in the novel.

    • @rexpipin08
      @rexpipin08 4 роки тому +3

      @@Nocturnalux Yes this is true about Wendy but according to Kubrick he wanted her to be submissive because he felt that a woman that was more head strong would be less likely to put up with Jack from the beginning.

    • @Nocturnalux
      @Nocturnalux 4 роки тому +1

      @@rexpipin08 Very much so but here too there was quite a shift in terms of character dynamics as Jack, in the novel, starts out as a decent guy whose alcoholism consumes him even as he struggles against it. In the movie we hardly get to see this caring side of him, he comes across as borderline crazy almost from the very first scene.
      I suspect these differences come, at least partly, from the necessary compression that Kubick added to the movie in which The Overlook is everything. The novel has a fairly detailed history of the family before the hotel ever came up in their life, such as Wendy issues growing up with a very demanding and mother, who has made her feel like an inadequate mother herself; and Jack's long, long struggle against addiction and the way it all came to a head when he run over an empty tricycle while driving after a booze orgy. Had the tricycle been occupied...he would have killed the child; which is also brilliant foreshadowing as it lets us know that Jack already feared hurting children long before the Overlook.
      I think Kubrick's choice of compressing the events was for the best but the novel also has much to offer in terms of letting us fully understand the family.

    • @rexpipin08
      @rexpipin08 4 роки тому

      @@Nocturnalux That's a very good way to analyze it and I have to admit I haven't yet read the novel. After reading the way you describe it to me I can see now how vastly different Kubrick's interpretation was to the original novel. It would be an interesting read to find out more relating to the family's past as you mention it.
      I can see now how Wendy and Jack's past can be seen to rise up again in the movie and uncover the very things that haunted them. Having only seen Kubrick's movie and witnessing the not so pleasant side of Jack from the beginning I would be interested to learn what his more pleasant side might have been like. Thank you I'll make a start on the novel as soon as I can get a copy.

  • @TripleTSingt
    @TripleTSingt 7 років тому +8

    In Dr. Sleep (the sequel novel to the shining), there is a camping ground at the location where the Overlook once was and the finale of the book happens there. It is hinted at in the book, that these circles are broken at that time, so they live past the destruction of the hotel.
    (oh, and yeah, the hotel gets destroyed in the book)

  • @smithb0134
    @smithb0134 4 роки тому +2

    Like Jack, who has “ALWAYS been the caretaker,” You and I are guests of the Overlook. We’ve “ALWAYS been guests of the Overlook.” We watch the film time and again looking for some nook and cranny of meaning within the frame that we missed the last umpteen times we’ve seen it. We search for some hidden clue that nobody else caught and yet we’re still fascinated by other people’s interpretations. Personally I check in the Overlook Hotel during October, around Halloween, as part of my horror movie binge watching marathon. I bet you didn’t even know that you were a guest of the Overlook and will ALWAYS be a guest. And that, my fellow guests, is the brilliance of Kubrick.

  • @janariley6901
    @janariley6901 3 роки тому +25

    After watching this and reading many of the comments, I have some theories about the theme of alcoholism in the movie.
    The photo is dated 1921, and American prohibition of alcohol began in 1920. For the photo to make sense, assuming people are enjoying cocktails as the movie shows, it would have to have been done in secret because of the law. There’s the theme of hiding alcohol use, a common behavior for alcoholics. Many alcoholics and non-alcoholics use holidays and special occasions as a celebratory reason, or excuse, to consume alcohol. They hide behavior, and put on a happy face for the world to see. The photo is of a large group of people, smiling, and celebrating when it could have only been done in secret in 1921.
    We can see, taste, smell, and touch a drink, but we cannot hear it. It is believed this is where “clinking” originated when we cheers and make a toast. The idea is that by creating sound, we satisfy all five senses in the enjoyment and consumption of the drink. The hotel is also missing this one sense of sound; it’s very quiet, and Jack’s five senses are not completely satisfied without it. Only Jack seems to be plagued by this silence. In order for the hotel to have sound, it must be created by the people who are there. By giving into his destructive alcoholism, Jack has caused much of the sounds to be those created by his own desperation - his yelling and Wendy’s cries. He’s hellbent on making as much noise as possible.
    REMEMBER: The shining is done in silence. Whole conversations happening without either person saying a word?! The shining is the ability to understand and connect with others without requiring actual sounds. Although it is entirely possible to drink alcohol without clinking glasses, Jack believes he must have this noise in order to be fully satisfied and to remain in denial that his drinking isn’t a problem - it’s merely used in celebration, a common excuse for consuming alcohol. Wendy and Danny can’t provide that sound he truly craves, in the form of enabling his alcoholism; however, the supernatural figures can because Jack is the one who sees and interacts with them. He says he would give his soul for a drink, and the bartender appears. Jack feels disconnected from his family and resentful at their ability to communicate in a way he cannot. He feels isolated, as alcoholics do, and he recluses further.
    The silence of “the shining” is deafening to the desperate and resentful Jack.
    When we cheers, we are making a toast, or toasting. Jack has no one to toast with but himself (maybe that’s why in King’s version, the hotel burns). It finally and literally toasts Jack.
    Jack is told he has always been “the caretaker.” The cycle of addiction and the psychological harm inflicted on the children of an alcoholic parent creates the unhealthy codependent - deemed literally “the caretaker.” It is safe to assume that Jack comes from a family of an alcoholic himself, backing the idea of repeated cycles of violence mentioned. Codependents or “caretakers” often cope with alcohol and drugs into adulthood, perpetuating the cycle. In the novel, Jack says thank God that Danny got out. Jack dies before the cycle could be repeated, which would have likely caused Danny to become a codependent, a caretaker - and more likely to become an alcoholic.
    Lastly, the last shot of the wall of photos show 21 pictures hanging on the wall. Remember the year 1921 and the picture states it was the 4th of July ball, keeping with the theme of America and patriotism, and the Overlook Hotel (overlook is an appropriate name) is located in Colorado.
    Colorado was unique in its passing of alcohol laws in regards to legal age for consumption. To put it briefly, it had the lowest age in the country of 18, which only a handful states also had. Just a FEW years after these states dropped their legal drinking to 18 (in response to people being able to vote at age 18 🇺🇸) thirty US states then raised their ages to 19 to combat drunk driving fatalities. Colorado did not. It wasn’t until four years after this movie that 21 become law across country. When this movie was made, the most common ages in states across the country were either 19 or 21. Colorado kept theirs at 18. Most states actively tried to curb consumption of alcohol in this way, but Colorado didn’t. And it was one of the only states with NO minimum drinking age after prohibition. Colorado did not budge from the age of 18 until the federal law was passed in 1984 that made 21 the legal minimum age nationwide.
    As Jack says, “Bourbon - the White Man’s Burden.”

  • @MWeistra
    @MWeistra 7 років тому +82

    One of the rare occasions where i liked the book, but loved the movie....

    • @maxmusic5380
      @maxmusic5380 5 років тому +5

      DE DUTCH KIDS People should stop comparing books and movies, they both work different

  • @D2016-1
    @D2016-1 7 років тому +69

    I literally watched this movie 3 hours ago

  • @nickmattio3397
    @nickmattio3397 7 років тому +55

    Jack wasn’t talking to any ghosts, Delbert and Lloyd were manifestations if Jacks own personality reaffirming his past/present choices because Jack can Shine too he’s just not self aware of it

    • @Babyjohn8170
      @Babyjohn8170 6 років тому +2

      Nick Mattio I agree

    • @TheRey64
      @TheRey64 5 років тому

      Kou Uraki OMMMGGG VIRG ALERT!! We have a virgin over here!! Anime watching butthole fingering virgin!!!

    • @alejandrocaban6339
      @alejandrocaban6339 5 років тому +7

      I'm disagree. When he is locked in the store room something freed him; we never seen the shining as telepathic.
      Also by the end Wendy start to see the ghosts.

    • @Sakuradragon639
      @Sakuradragon639 5 років тому +4

      Its the hotel shining to them. Showing them what it sees when it shines

    • @AdoreYouInAshXI
      @AdoreYouInAshXI 5 років тому +1

      Gold Monkey, if you had read the book then you'd know that even Danny suspected that Jack had some of the Shining. So before you go calling people retards, you may as well know what the fuck you're talking about.

  • @Bad_At_Parties
    @Bad_At_Parties 5 років тому +1

    I have to hand it to you: there's a lot of pretentious videos discussing this film on UA-cam, but this is one of the better ones I've seen. You actually use the film to analyze the film, instead of reading into it a lot of outside influences that often feel very convenient or outright ridiculous. I've seen people read Holocaust/Nazi influence in this film, or even argue that Kubrick left hints that he filmed the moon landing, which range from somewhat interesting to batshit insane. I really like that your theories were grounded in a lot of what can actually be proven by an examination of the script or images on the screen, and based on what those involved in the film have said about their intent. Well done!

  • @davonnasteele2943
    @davonnasteele2943 5 років тому +18

    Still talking about it in 2019" can't beat out a classic like THE SHINING 😈

  • @dylanmorgan2374
    @dylanmorgan2374 6 років тому +24

    This movie is a pure gem. Wish horror movies nowadays has this kinda depth

  • @leoinsf
    @leoinsf 4 роки тому +7

    Through the artistry of Stanley Kubrick, the effectiveness of the actors and actresses, and the over-powering realism of the cinematography, just as you said in your commentary: "We are trapped in the Outlook Hotel forever!!!
    Yes, this cycle began with the writer, Stephen King with a well-written, effective book, but Kubrick pulled the plot of the book out of King's some-what scary world of vivid characters and scary plot twists and put the movie version into a vividly compelling and horrifying universe of ultimate terror and fascination.
    Because of the depth of expertise of Stanley Kubrick's version of the Stephen King novel, we are thrown into a universe of levels of possibilities.
    It is obvious that Stanley did not want us to figure-out his movie because once something is predictable and understandable, we are not trapped by it.
    Stanley has successfully trapped us with this movie and though he is gone from the earth, nothing we can do will solve the mystery of the Overlook Hotel and free us from reliving what happened in the Overlook Hotel over and over and over again!!! What a marvelous work of art!

  • @awg7068
    @awg7068 5 років тому +8

    Based upon the perspective of the book, Jack submits to the evil in the hotel and becomes a part of the haunting.

  • @proverbial4252
    @proverbial4252 5 років тому +2

    This is one of the best approaches I've seen/heard about the film.
    Yet although there are many levels to consider, there is only one explanation that covers and contains them all.
    It even explains what the "shining" means exactly.
    This is even in consideration of unconscious intentions from the directior, because the symbolisms he uses, are simple accurate.
    There is a clear meaning that connects all the dots.

  • @EvilTwin123
    @EvilTwin123 5 років тому +20

    I always thought jack was absorbed into the 1920s and is living in that time period now.

    • @henrysabo8218
      @henrysabo8218 4 роки тому +3

      Evil Twin
      What I took away from the book is that you don’t get sucked in, you’re always part of it hence one of the main lines of the book “all times are one”. I believe that jack was a reincarnated version of the overlook to do the bidding of the building itself.

    • @andreaswesterveld
      @andreaswesterveld 3 роки тому

      Maybe that's why he sayed the n word

    • @andria8279
      @andria8279 3 роки тому

      @@andreaswesterveld they said it in the 80’s too

    • @andreaswesterveld
      @andreaswesterveld 3 роки тому

      @@andria8279 Yeah some people say it nowadays too

  • @willmaas187
    @willmaas187 5 років тому +5

    I really just came here to learn what the picture meant but thanks for an entire presentation.

  • @brigoose7945
    @brigoose7945 5 років тому +11

    The photo at the ending is his soul in the hotel forever hence him in the photo.

  • @Jwa-fo6nb
    @Jwa-fo6nb 9 місяців тому

    Finally someone who actually explained what happens in the movie instead of their opinion.
    Lady you just gain a subscriber.

  • @uniquechannelnames
    @uniquechannelnames 6 років тому +2

    This is an incredible analysis of this movie. Gave a lot of insight. Honestly this movie is so brilliant on so many levels. I especially love the "impossible" architecture of the hotel, with impossible hallways and door placements. Thanks for your work!

  • @mac19019
    @mac19019 6 років тому +6

    1) I think Jack has the ability to shine, but represses it. That's why he's so able to go through all these things, and be manipulated so easily. Because his abilities are very weak. Thoughts?
    2) I've been trying to abstain from seeing this movie for the 40th time but now I have no choice.
    3) Stanley Kubrick is a cinematic genius. King though a good author, Kubrick made a masterpiece.

    • @tomnorton4277
      @tomnorton4277 6 років тому

      Actually Jack's Shine is the strongest in the movie. How else would he have been able to catch Dick off guard at the end?

  • @robinlo2650
    @robinlo2650 7 років тому +26

    9 people disliked this video, I should correct them.

  • @stephaniejames6672
    @stephaniejames6672 5 років тому +4

    I’ve seen this film numerous times. I saw it when it came out in the theater when I was 5 years old. I have to say that people sometimes miss some obvious points in the film. Jack shouldn’t be carrying the entire load here. His whole family went mad - Wendy is on edge and hysterical, Danny stopped talking, and Jack keeps going on about his responsibilities, never mind that Wendy is the only one working while he uses his typewriter to lie to his family about his writer’s block. Those repetitive sentences and the constant report of the typewriter always struck me as a way to keep his family away from him while hiding his inability to provide for them. Jack didn’t do anything violent until after Wendy gave him a brain aneurysm with a baseball bat to the head. Wendy killed Jack, not the cold. He was slurring his words and swinging an axe only after his brain injury.

  • @handofstand
    @handofstand 5 років тому +2

    I love it when you let people's imaginations run wild by creating a huge vehicle like this for them, but specifically for horror. Makes people appreciate life.
    Another one in video games is the original trilogy of Splatterhouse games by Namco.

  • @p0479
    @p0479 5 років тому +5

    It has multiple meanings. That's why it's so good. Many interpretations. Awesome flick.

  • @calibehr
    @calibehr 5 років тому +3

    I saw this in the theater in NYC during it's original release. I love horror and this movie scared the crap out of me. Now, at age 60, it is still the best, most horrifying film I've ever seen. Funny, I was planning a trip to Oregon earlier this year and wanted to see the Columbia River Gorge area - I was looking at hotels the the Timberline Lodge came up. Something about the pics of the exterior gave me the creeps and I couldn't understand why. A bit later I discovered it was used as the exterior for the Overlook. All those years and still a shot of the exterior of the filming location creeped me out. I don't know a better testimony to the power of a film - at least for me.

  • @amyjacquelineg.9541
    @amyjacquelineg.9541 6 років тому +6

    I always assumed he was just withdrawing from alcohol & going mad ,rather than a supernatural figure.

  • @fuckshit3919
    @fuckshit3919 4 роки тому +3

    the most horrific part was the "all work and no play makes jack a dull boy"

  • @ben2nd
    @ben2nd 3 роки тому +1

    The most scary part is the amount the narrator cares about the colours red, white and blue

  • @surasap2552
    @surasap2552 3 роки тому +1

    First time I saw this movie was when I were alone in my room at midnight. I ce only seen the last 30 minutes. And I realized this is kind of master piece of art ever seen. The golden room, how sublime of the image and all cinematography still in my brain. Ambiguity ending made this film more and more interesting to analyze.

  • @drpun67
    @drpun67 7 років тому +11

    Anyone who's a fan of The Shining, check out the music video from 30 Seconds to Mars : The Kill. A great homage to a great film.

    • @Pikminiman
      @Pikminiman 5 років тому

      That was a neat music video I never would have watched if it weren't for your comment. Thanks for sharing.

  • @mikailanolanxo
    @mikailanolanxo 2 роки тому +5

    I swear, Stephen King is truly a freakin’ mastermind. The stories he has come up with & all the movies that have been made due to him, always blow me away.
    It’s not always horror tho either. He’s amazing at so many different genres. But, that being said, horror is my favourite of his.

    • @WilliamButtlicker
      @WilliamButtlicker Рік тому

      This is possibly his only complete horror film. And as much of a genius he is, the credit for this should be given to Stephen King and the cast too.

  • @jackxfn-2678
    @jackxfn-2678 4 роки тому +3

    Here’s my explanation i think when he entered the hotel and stayed for months at the overlook hotel made him start hallucinating previous events in the hotel and playing mind games on him believing he was always the care taker of the overlook hotel. Then he got possessed and tried to kill his family. Then when that picture showed at the end was all the souls that died in the overlook hotel.

  • @wackousersden4726
    @wackousersden4726 5 років тому

    Now i know why this movie with its advance cinmetography , sound design and offcourse direction laid the foundation of all the supernatural, psycho , horror thriller that we see today.Truly a masterpiece ! Long Live Kubrick's Legacy !

  • @JohnWesleyDowney
    @JohnWesleyDowney 4 роки тому

    Oh thank you thank you thank you wise people of THE TAKE because us mere viewers of the movie would never be intelligent enough to figure out a friggin' movie ending without your help. Because working for a you tube channel means you are so much smarter than the every day movie goer.

  • @dh031729
    @dh031729 4 роки тому +6

    "I'm not going to hurt you, I'm just going to bash your brains" WOW!

  • @ferd1572
    @ferd1572 5 років тому +3

    Here's my theory:
    Jack is a reincarnation of Delbert Grady, and the quote "all work and no play makes jack a dull boy" is suggesting that Delbert (Jack) has gone too long without murdering someone, and that the "Work" is his family and job, and the "play" is the murdering he does. Might also be alcohol...

  • @stevejobs5919
    @stevejobs5919 4 роки тому +3

    "Im not gonnna hurt ya, Im just gonna bash your brains in", got me lolling so hard lmao

  • @deedeetee17
    @deedeetee17 6 місяців тому

    Kubrick ELEVATED King’s simple story into something otherworldly, transcendent, terrifying, unsettling, cyclical; Kubrick is a king among Kings.

  • @lexingtonlad5745
    @lexingtonlad5745 11 місяців тому

    This has to be the most concise overview of this classic of movies.