she is considered attractive if you pile on so much make up so you look like a barbie doll so she has a following, no mistake they are not following her cause she is smart.
agreed. I used to sub to Mike The Cop on UA-cam because he was funny. That was until he posted a video of some Karen sherif complaining that her child does not have a covid vaccine and is being discriminated against by the school. He thought she was a hero for doing it .
@@chriskelvin248 A few years ago I read something along the lines of, "my Grandmother said that years ago every village and town had its own idiot - then along came the internet, and every idiot could now communicate with every other idiot." How true this anecdote is I couldn't say - there might not have been any Grandmother, however it's difficult to argue with the observation.
"Sometimes there's air resistance and sometimes there's not, therefore gravity does not exist." Is probably one of the most asinine flat-earth "proofs" I have ever witnessed.
@@the98themperoroftheholybri33 But the tides have water moving side to side...... The moon's gravity 'pulls' water to the side,; this water bunches up and creates high tide. Not a small feat for a 'lamp'.
It's funny that she's saying things are falling faster in a vacuum because there's no air resistance (resistance to what?) but forgets to explain why they're falling in the first place
I have gravity force which interacts with all women in the universe. Gravity force has no limit. All women in the world are being attracted. To my gravity
@@MarceldeJong she also claims planets aren't planets... but "luminaries" then claims theres a 'luminary" covered in Water & "ripples", the type that you'd only find.. . On a PLANET.
@@nodramalama9531 To fool everyone into thinking the earth is round? I dunno, man, if mental gymnastics were an Olympic sport, these poeple would be taking home gold!
I actually saw Professor Eric Laithwaite do this demo in the 70's. A long time expert in gyroscopes he had worked on auto pilot systems during the war. He used the jumbo gyro to explain the preservation of angular momentum and how the reaction to any input force is offset by 90 deg to the disturbing force. He always made his talks highly entertaining and joked the lightening of the weight of the big gyro was like anti-gravity. He would had found it absolutely hilarous that this girl decided to ignore all the theory and be taken in by it.
I guess adult video is the only adult thing she'll be capable of doing. And if anything smart ever came out of her mouth, it most certainly weren't words.
This girl is so confident that she is the first to come up with these questions and the first to provide the "true" answers. The Dunning-Kruger effect at its finest.
At least by then, she'll have less people listening to her. Not to sound crass, but there are a lot of people who would listen to anything a pretty woman says, no matter how batsh!t it is.
I’m willing to bet that she still stands on a scale every morning, not realising that she is proving gravity right then. Mass has weight because of gravity.
Flat Earther: "Don't trust Google when it tells you about gravity" Also Flat Earther: "Now look what Google has to say about air resistance" The Earth: 🌎
Similarly with these fools: "We haven't gone deeper than 8 miles so we CANNOT know what's down there" But also: "We've never been to the dome/firmament, or to the antarctic rim/edge, or to those 'luminaries', but we can be CERTAIN NASA lies to us"
And where would such "earth" be, hilarious globe-cultist goofball who still doesn't have a clue where he lives by 2022? Can you find even a single degree of curvature on this perfectly flat level plane, nincompoop?
@@grantm6514 I've never been to America, but what the hey, I'll take a chance on believing its there! Will I look silly if it turns out Columbus was just having a lol moment, and all that New York/western/Hollywood/Sitting Bull/Abraham Lincoln/Route 66/Elvis/Yellowstone/Disney/Grand Canyon stuff turns out to be just a load of bull put out by the fakers of the "USA society"! :D
The irony is strong with this one: She says "Do we have any actual evidence, factual evidence of what is inside the Earth?" AND yet she has NO "actual" evidence that the planets and the moon are just lights. 🤦♂🤣
Oh yeah...the same with without air things are falling with the same speed. But Jenny...when you're so self conscious about what you say, please explain:"Why are things falling down?". American kids are really not the brightest candles out there...😂😂😂
There's nothing wrong with having questions, but people like her give off the impression that they don't care if there is or isn't scientific answers to their inquiries. They seem to believe that by merely asking the question they're answering it too. That's not how this works.
That is EXACTLY the strategy. They find someone that tells them "Don't trust anyone". That warning makes this person 100% trustworthy, they can believe every word they say. Next step: The person gives them a prefabricated list of rhethorical gotcha questions, telling them "when speak those out, that proves how smart you are. There is no answer to this question, no need to listen to any answers. Also not required to even understand the questions. You are a genius and always right when you stick to this script". That's exactly what is happening here. The funny thing is they are all SOOOO persuaded what free, independent thinkers they are while they regurgitate these slogans blindly. They could not tell you ANYthing beyond the literal text. They cannot formulate it in their own words, combine it with personal experience or integrate external information. That is all detrimental to the dogma, because as long as this exists alone and unquestioned, it is perfect and consistent - exactly what these people long for. A simple "explanation" (i.e. "That is the Truth. Period") for everything. Works for all these cults, for Creationism, Trumpism, climate change denial, anti-vaxxers, and so on. "When I persuade myself this is the Truth, then I am always right and all others are wrong - that new gut feeling is all I need to be happy".
That 1666 year of gravity being discovered is the finest example of cherry picking I've ever seen. When I saw this, I immediately went to Google and typed "what year was gravity discovered". I got various results, some saying 1687, some simply saying 1680s, some saying 1665 and some 1666. Even on Jenny's own screen it says "around 1665" in bold and 1666 is just an alternative date. Yet out of all of these possible years, she picks the only one that suits her "satanic symbolism" narrative. Why doesn't she pick any of the other dates? Like I said, cherry picking at its finest.
Also, these jackasses basically use any repetitive occurrence of the number 6 to mean the devil is involved. The "number of the beast" is supposed to be 666; not 1666, not 216, not 66, not 18, not a single 6 in three different numbers. It's literally just looking for anything they can twist to fit their claims.
I love picking these numerology idiots apart. Like.... oh, so 1666 is an evil devil number because 666 is a component? But we can discard the 1000 part safely, apparently. So is any number that has 666 as a component evil? Is 667? or 668? or 2480? or 4,501,024? They all have 666 as a component and some left over. How about multiples of 666? Are they evil too? There's no faster way to expose their nonsense.
"Isn't it interesting that Mars and Venus look the same as these planets that they say are gas" Someone needs to show her one of those "things that are secretly cake" videos. Just because two things look the same, does not make them the same. Additional information is needed.
And yet, Mars and Venus don’t look _quite_ the same as stars... Long ago (decades, yikes) I was lucky enough to go to an astronomy camp for one week. I already forgot lots of stuff, such as how to properly use a telescope with an equatorial mount, but I DO remember (particularly because that’s something one can observe every day) that the planets do not twinkle. Only stars do. (If someone wants a non-NASA source for this, well, is it not written : Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star?)
@@DavidSmith-vr1nb I quickly looked it up because it *_has_* been a long time, and apparently we’re both right? As in, it is indeed an atmospheric effect, but unless they’re low on the horizon, the twinkling of a planet would not be noticeable to the eye. I guess they gave us, bunch of teenagers, the simplified explanation, because we would not observe any low planets.
"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" has never been more true than in the information age when knowledge is accessible and ubiquitous, ironically.
People like her make me sad. You can be good looking and stupid as a bag of rocks and still be more successful than the average person who actually tries to be helpful to society.
@@treepotato9273 You know what makes me sick? Beta cucks desperate to get their daily white knighting done. It should be obvious this woman doesn't use her brains to attract the attention she clearly craves.
I do love how she claims people who see through her weak arguments are indoctrinated. It's ironic really as that's precisely what she is and is trying to do to others.
well you know when some one is trying to "brain wash you" they are going to start their argument with "you've been BRAINWASHED to believe such and such, but I AM going to tell you the TRUTH"
Realistically, I don't think she's indoctrinated with this FE crap at all. I 100% believe she's doing it to get that sweet, sweet internet clout. She realized that there's an unfortunately large audience of lonely, basement-dwelling neckbeards who happen to also subscribe to these conspiracy "theories"; and that by pandering to that group of demonstrably gullible individuals, she could provoke a reaction of "omg purdy girl shares my interests, lemme smash" and gain an essentially ready-made audience. Don't get me wrong, I give her points for finding a niche for herself, even if the only smashing her videos make me want to do is with my head against a brick wall... But yeah, guaranteed she doesn't believe any of this stuff at all, and is just taking advantage of the FE community to gain clout (which, to be fair, they're basically begging to be taken advantage of).
@@diemturner5755 I don't even think it's Dunning-Kruger. She is outright lying. She KNOWS she is lying. She's a con artist, manipulating stupid people for cash. You can tell by her face that she doesn't believe a single word she says.
I've personally used a very expensive telescope on a clear night to see Saturn, and let me tell you, it looks nothing like those first pictures. I can see how it would be hard to get a photo of it, but using the naked eye through one of these telescopes gives you a very clear image of the planet. I was blown away by how clear the image was. It looked very similar to the photos she says are "cartoons" It's sad that these people preach "do your own research" and yet fail to do anything of the sort themselves.
@@jerenoize If Christian fundamentalism taught me anything as a child it's that you never listen to people with opposing viewpoints, they are just trying to lure you to satan. Obviously I got away from all that but its sad what some kids are brainwashed into. It disgusts me that these same people pretend like we are being indoctrinated by being taught science, when their entire M.O. is to do just that, indoctrinate kids using fear tactics.
I was recently SHOCKED to see some worrying posts by someone I knew in High School that now thinks NASA is evil and I thought believed the earth is flat but turned out he believed something arguably even more ridiculous...that the earth is a toroidal sphere. What has happened to these poor souls...
How hilarious that the last website link she pointed to-the one that said "Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact"- is a satirical website with a disclaimer at the top of the page: "This satirical look at "only a theory" disclaimers imagines what might happen if advocates applied the same logic to the theory of gravitation that they do to the theory of evolution." A perfect example of how flat earthers "do their own research." Find something that seems to support your personal belief and look no further. Brilliant.
Confirmation bias, lack of critical thinking skills, and a deeply rooted psychological "need" to feel included and/or part of something special. These, in a nutshell (no pun intended 😆,) work as a team to allow people to accept nonsensical concepts/claims as truth, while simultaneously blocking, not only their ability to identify and process false/unfounded claims, but also their desire to do so. Truth≠fact
Way late to the party, but my god is this a perfect explanation of the causes of the proliferation of anti- and counter-theory that has sprung up as a direct consequence of social media and the resultant shift in the components of self-worth, especially among the younger generations.@@brb7635
Actually, the site is not satirical. It's the NCSE - National Center for Science Education. The article you mention is ON the site, but is not the site itself. Everyone who is as appalled as I am by the extremely low scientific literacy of the American public in general, and of creationists and flat-Earthers and moon-landing deniers and mudflood enthusiasts and so on, should consider giving NCSE at least their moral support, and if possible, their financial support as well. No, I do not work for them, or for anyone else. I am retired, and just a strong proponent of scientific literacy as being vital to our nation's future.
I wish every flat earther who says something like "gravity isn't real" would opt out from physics and will suddently rush towards the sky and disappear in the sky. I mean we couldn't even blame physics for that because it's constantly bullied by those people
Also why dont we drill deeper , one of the deepest we got was a bit over 12 km in 1970s and at that depth temp is round 180°C/356°F (estimation was round 100°C) , drill hole is in Russia near Finnish border , at that point "solid rocks" were already acting like plastic , so drilling it was not possible ... earth crust was estimated to be 35 km think , at the location of that drill hole . One thing that drilling provided was idea of deep drill hole geothermic power plants , you need to steam up water , just pump it deep underground , pumping water uses way less energy than trying to heat that water by burning something .
@@daeviant Exactly! Even animals like birds understood the nature of gravity millions of years before humans existed. We're so arrogant to believe that we are the only ones that can discover anything.
@@pete_lind Because the pressure and temperature melts the drill bit. We simply don't have the technology and there's no need to because seismology already provides the information.
I don't know how that would work. The flat earth model contains so many features that would need to be deliberate that it is hard to explain how they came about without resorting to the divine.
@@CD_Character True, but most of them are. My favourite is Dave Weiss. He posts videos that literally debunk what he is saying, and his fans still treat him like the Messiah.
"The Moon is a light, that's why the closer you get up to it the more it fades away." That's not how lights work Jenny. Please just look at a lightbulb from across the room then walk toward it.
hahaha she gets her info from tictok and google, then says google is lies, and she is a flat earther.......there is no way she'll figure out how to walk towards a light bulb unless a milenial with a certain number of followers shows her. your words mean zero to her. :)
What does she even mean by "the closer you get"? I'm willing to bet she doesn't believe in the space program, so with that assumption, no one has ever gotten "closer" to it.
„That’s how a sphere reflects light. A sphere illuminates itself“ she said, showing a friggin empty glass dome to tell us about how a solid rock sphere ‚should‘ behave.
The talking Bratz doll has just punctuated something I've seen in many situations... the practical definition of "indoctrination" in society is: Teaching people from an early age anything you personally think isn't true. Give her 10, maybe 20 years wearing no more support than a tube top, though, and she's gonna discover gravity in a way she doesn't appreciate.
Put the feather and the golf ball back in the vacuum chamber, evacuate it to a vacuum, lay the chamber on its side, and let the feather and golf ball drop. Do that for every orientation, and note the direction they drop. Its always the same durection! Thats kinda destroying her claim.
These people are too unbelievably stupid they can't grasp the concepts needed to produce a vacuum chamber of any size. It takes some degree of intelligence to keep air out of a container in a way that lets you also remove air from it. All the glue and tape in the world wouldn't help you if you don't understand what gasses and liquid are or how they move to fill containers. It's very clear listening to these people, they do not understand enough physics to get those concepts at any workable level. At most these morons will say they can make a vacuum chamber and fail to produce so much as a penis pump as proof.
It is quite funny that they don't realize that Aristotle fixed that issue a few millenia ago. He fixed it in the wrong way, but he fixed it. He also argued that density makes objects fall, but he couldn't figure out why the objects would always fall in the same direction. And there were two options, either objects would fall towards greater densities, and since their is only air above them and to the side, they fall down (this is basically gravity) or the earth is the center of the universe and all objects fall towards the center. We know today that he picked the wrong option because this mostly was the birth of the geocentric model. But the option of gravity is a lot older than Newton. However Newton actually formed the vague ideas into a usable formula that allowed people to calculate the movement of planets. Before that those vague ideas were unfallsiable because they weren't able to make predictions.
@@missharry5727 because of gravity and the attraction between objects that have mass. Arguments about density don't make sense because objects always fall in a certain direction and flat earth can't explain why.
"Herp derp the furthest anyone's dug is eight miles" Yeah. And nobody has ever cut my chest open, but I can still show you CT scans, PET scans, ultrasounds and X-Rays of the tumour that was in there.
Thank you! That's the exact same concept. Waves and radiation exist. We can measure them. If we couldn't measure seismic waves to deduce the inner workings of earth, how could we measure radiation and sound waves to know the inner workings of our body? Nobody had to cut me open before I needed heart surgery or broke my leg. We could all see it through measuring waves and radiation bursting through my body. How is this an argument?
Yeah, especially when she talked about the video with the spinning wheel. She haven't got a single clue about what's happening in that video. Pfff, disproved gravity.... Hah 😂
sadly a lot of these people get most of their "education" thru tiktok and facebook. the two greatest "educational institutions" on earth. This is our fault for allowing these dumb apps to become part of natural life. we give kids these things then blame them for being stupid. you give a chimp a gun, the poor critter has no idea bullets come out real fast and will kill, so you cant hold the chimp accountable for killing someone....its the person who gave the chimp the gun who is guilty.
@@caseytaylor1487 Exactly. I only detest people who use their resources to make other people's lives worse. Having money doesn't mean you're evil, it's being an elitist and sadistic douchebag with no regards for the life of others that make someone evil
1=1 is a theory not a fact xD scientist can and will never proof that 1 is actually Equal to 1 xD I love how even her argument with the vacuum is logical but she got the wrong conclusion out of it because she doesn't understand anything.
@@Mystra nah I don't trust you xD and math says any positive full number ^0 equals 1 and other numbers ^0 equal 0 so 0^0 can be 0 and 1 there fore no Nobel prize for you xD it is long ago I had math so no blame for any wrong statement
We’re taught about this in high school in my country. Maybe something to add to the American curriculum ? Also, flat earthers are bad at history. Plinus went on and on in his Historiae Naturalis about how we know the earth is round, how much its diameter is, how to measure and calculate it… He died in the Pompei eruption 2000 years ago.
@@Laure__Lineyea it’s in the American curriculum, I feel like that’s pretty obviously not the problem though as these people say stuff like the earth is flat and gravity is fake which are pretty clearly taught at a young age
"I'm gonna address a question that I get constantly" - I seriously doubt people actually asking here anything, at all. I hope some day a close friend of hers pulls her back and says, "you need to stop this". It's really painful to watch all this.
@@grogdizzy5814 The questions would be from her TikTok followers, but most comments on her page are so generic that I am not sure whether they're real people or just bots.
Geologist here: Instruments can see beyond human senses, it's why we use them. Seismology explains this by analyzing compression waves, which can only travel through physical objects and their velocities which are affected by the properties of materials. Instruments can sense these waves on the other side of the planet and record their velocities, indicating what they're traveling through. Every earthquake furthers our understanding of the planet.
The same way the wavelengths of light reflected of foreign planetary surfaces can indicate the composition of its atmosphere? I'm not a scientist honest question I'm not sure I understood that correctly.
@@jaydru2236 Absolutely, astronomical spectroscopy is how we determine the composition of distant objects! Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey excellently explains this in episode 5.
@@thjacobi2 thankyou for that I will have to check that out. Not a scientist as I said but it's wise to learn about our universe and by extension our place in it. It's quite humbling to say the least.
What I don't understand about flat earthers is that they are so close to the answer. They ask these questions, but then don't bother to actually look up the answer. Their minds just work by asking a question and then immediately drawing a conclusion. Absolutely baffles me.
I choose not to understand (thistopic), that means the earth is flat. That's the conclusion from people who struggle to find brain power for thinking and breathing at the same time.
Like, she understood that in a vacuum things fall at sane speed due to lack of air resistance. So why stop thinking!!! Flerfers always go on about density but this girl accepted a vacuum chamber is a good place for an experiment. Ok what I causing the objects to fall down and not upwards?
Love how she proves the very things she is trying to debunk. Also, gravity wasn't "discovered" by Newton, it was mathematically proven by Newton. People were well aware of gravity long before then.
@@-WhizzBang- wasn't disputing the who of it, just the difference between "discovering" and showing the proof of how it works. Maybe you should read the whole comment next time
@@Gothmogdabalrog I think you are the one who needs to re read your own comment, Skippy. You obviously didn't look it up! He Discovered it, and he didn't prove how it works, they still don't fully understand how it works, even today. He just proved it's existence. Try to think before commenting again, or at least run it by an adult first....
“The moon is a light. Ok? That’s why the closer you get up to it, the more it fades away.” What the ever loving hell is she talking about?! Lights fade away as you get closer to them?
At 6:25, when she quotes the sentence saying that we will never have direct evidence, the very next sentence, which she even shows on screen, says that scientists use seismic waves. So either she is phenomenally stupid - or she knows quite well for yourself that what she says is nonsense and only relies on her audience to be phenomenally stupid...
The irony of someone using a ton of make-up and camera filters to try and draw in thirsty blokes, who is trying to describe NASA's imagery as 'cartoons' and 'fake'😆
@@maladetts + First of all, if you're seeking proof, you should be on a mathematics channel. The concept of proofs is foundational to mathematics. Science does not offer or claim to "prove" things. That tells me what your level of understanding is, right off the bat. Second of all, her astronomical images are ridiculous. I'm no astronomer but my little $400 telescope produces vastly better images, and I'm not even on a mountain top, which is where most decent terrestrial observations are done, due to the bottom mile or two of atmosphere being such a distorting factor in astronomical observation. But I do know a little bit about the structure of our globe. I don't know where ScimanDan got 150 seismograph stations from, so I'm not going to guess. But I can tell you we have a lot of seismometers out there. Mount St Helens alone has about 140. Internationally if there are about 2000 ocean floor seismometers and over 11,000 land-based seismometers networked around the globe. Just as we do not have to drill into a pregnant mother to image the baby in her uterus using sound waves, we can do quite accurate acoustic tomography of the interior of our globe. These instruments are sensitive and precise, which is why the USGS knows Lil Kim has been playing with nukes in North Korea before the DOD does. And it's why we can tell the difference between one of those nukes and a volcanic eruption in Indonesia. Absolutely none of that would be possible on a flat Earth. And it's why we know the structure and composition of our planet in such detail. When there is an earthquake in Alaska, seismometers all over the world receive that acoustic information at very specific times. Absolutely none of that would make any sense or be even possible on this girl's Pizza Earth.
@@47f0 A clown here dropped a wild claim out of nowhere that all the facts the lady presented are "absolutely wrong" just because he did not like them and they ruin his cozy globe cult, I guess - I ask how so, and you're writing me a clownish bunch of unrelated nonsense about "mathematics" and "mathematics channels" while proceeding to speak about seismology and astronomy, and not mathematics somehow; shocking your cultist buddies here that science "does not prove anything"; and playing a psychic here about my "level of understanding" of god knows what? What this tells me right off the bat is that you're a quirky goofball with serious mental issues, to say the least. You're on a site that offers endless channels of astronomy observations - you are welcome to put your money where your mouth is and disprove them all by setting up your own channel and uploading any images that would be "better" or "different" than the ones we've had. What's exactly "ridiculous" to you about the real-life astronomical observations is not clear at all from your vague incoherent gibberish. You could have tried and explained it IN ACTUAL WORDS. We all have been taught sheer nonsense about the "structure" of a "globe" that doesn't exist and no one can show in real life, with the only reality that we all directly observe, document and experience at all times being a stationary flat level plane. Whatever knowledge any of us has about any fairy-tales and any mythology is not related to the physical objective material reality where we have a constant unchanged unbent horizontal level and not a single degree of magic curvature to be found. How does seismology that all is happening on a flat level plane excuse your outdated debunked absurd globe myths in the 21st century in the era of human flight, is absolutely unclear. Your clownish mantras that the observed documented experienced reality "cannot" somehow "be possible" are based on what? Your groundless cultist indoctrinated beliefs you cannot let go and hold dear to your heart despite all factual reality all around you? There is no such thing as "tomography of the interior of your globe" you are making up on the go. You don't have even a slightest degree of curvature to provide to even START dreaming of any globes, moreover such that would be dashing past multiple new Polar stars and crumbling constellations (which you also must be seeing in your "little telescope"?). NO matter how many times you repeat nonsensical phrases "our globe" and "our planet", our flat level plane WILL NOT become those in real life and you'll never provide a single evidence to such made-up magic. If we're speaking of POSSIBILITIES, nothing we have in our world would be possible at all on a spinning pear flying through space. The globe cult itself is so nonsensical and absurd that it does not make any sense - so you should refrain from even appealing to sense: something that you completely reject and deny. Your clownish nonsense expressions like "pizza earth" and "Lil Kim playing with nukes" tell right off the bat about your level of education and cognitive abilities overall. The only state on earth that PLAYED with nukes in a criminal lethal mass-murdering manner was the United States, or "Lil Uncle Sam", which has been occupying half of Korea where it committed endless atrocities in the early 50's and since then has been waging a genocide on the northern part of the country through a sanction war. The reconnaissance of what's going on across the 38th parallel is done quite simply - and it does not involve or require your clownish eggplant-earth or pear-earth fairy-tales, pizza-loving chump. Now if you wanna be talking about earthquakes and seismology at all, learn what a PLATE is, for starters.
Just what I need an ignorant youngster to point out how I have been indoctrinated. People who do not understand, trying to make their ignorance into knowledge. Thanks Dan and keep up the good work.
Jeez, as a physics student i wish I was indoctrinated. Then I would'nt have had to sit through the incredibly long and tedious Lab Practicals, where I was hardly supported by the Tutors and had to figure out everything by myself from some loose tasks.
Somebody should ask her - did she come up with those explanations on her own, or is she just parroting other videos that she's seen online? If the latter, wouldn't that mean she's been indoctrinated, just in a different way? Even if the former is true, she's only getting half of the scientific process. It's not enough to ask questions and posit an explanation; she has to actually prove her assertions.
oh dont worry theres plenty of ignorant dinosaurs running around peddling this shit. its from the old people after all isnt it. not like they made sure to fund education snd put a leash on the churches.
It's mind-boggling that she understood that air resistance was the reason that things usually fall at different rates but don't in a vacuum yet she totally missed the part where they wouldn't fall at all without gravity in the first place. She stated that air resistance was an upward force but seemed oblivious that there would have to be a greater downward force in order for them to fall downwards. It's hard to fathom such stupidity.
The old, "all holes are shallow" objection? Why do flat earthers think that you have to physical visit something to know anything about it? Standing on the Earth has not helped them determine its nature.
She basically found a video of somebody showing something that suited her narrative and also said "scientific fact". She was so happy she could shove the term "scientific fact" in the face of people she was trying to get at. Bless her.
@@peekster0 Yeah, I had a good chuckle at that part right before I facepalmed so hard my eyeballs fell out. I mean how hard is it to understand gyroscopic motion?
That one sentence right there: "Gravity is the most irrelevant and unnecessary thing", - is quite possibly the dumbest thing I have ever heard anyone say. It's kinda the opposite! 😆 If it wasn't for gravity, none of us would exist, nor would anything that makes the universe what it is either! Massive face palm moment right there 🙄
Of course she doesn't believe gravity is real, she probably keeps a couple rocks in her pockets to stop all that air in her head from carrying her off 😏
If gravity is not real, why is she using a piece of clothing to hold her uh....planets in place to begin with? Shouldn't they never sag as gravity doesn't exist?
I certainly did. ❤ 😅 She should leave the science to science-y people and stick to fashion advice or dating tips, or even gaming vids. She might do alright. This is just going to give her a reputational hangover. 🤦♂️😖
I feel so bad for the children of these people who will most likely want to learn more about science and how things work but get bombarded by nonsense and misunderstanding by their parents who have been indoctrinated into this insanity
The clip of Professor Eric Laithwaite at the Royal Institution Lectures in 1974 brought back some memories. He was suggesting that gyroscopes did not obey Newtonian motion and could be used as a form of reactionless propulsion. He was very entertaining and the lectures were very popular among the science geek teenagers like me they were aimed at. He was also wrong as he’d later admit, gyroscopes do behave in accordance with Newtonian mechanics. He would have never denied the existence of gravity.
I've seen Mars with my telescope, sure it isn't THAT powerful, but I did see a round object, not a fuzzy blob of light, same with Saturn and Jupiter. This is with a basic reflector telescope I got at toysrus for $110. Even with JUST my camera, using the infinity setting I was able to see Jupiter and its moons, and they looked NOTHING like those "luminaries" flat earthers claim.
Shocking right? That Flearthers only use their bottom shit amateur photos and use them as "absolute proof" of how it actually should look like. And claiming everything else must be fake. Such bellends.
It's simple really, followers of such bullshitters will never critically think about and fact check anything they say They are gullible fools who like to think they are special and will just accept it.
The fact that all this lady’s bits of “evidence” and articles that she keeps moving from side to side to show us on her green screen are all the bare minimum, surface level Google snippets/summaries rather than the actual source articles themselves… tells me everything I need to know.
Almost EVERY Tik Tok person's videos are like that when they have a green screen. They're all recording with their cell phones, so they always move their cameras all over the place to point them at themselves, then the wall behind them, and then back and forth over and over again. Whenever I see one of these videos, they make me seasick. They won't keep their cameras still because they HAVE to get their faces on that camera, but editing the stuff they want to show to pop up on the screen takes too much effort. Much easier to just move the camera all over the place to show the wall behind you. Also, NONE of them do the green screen right, resulting in the edges of their faces and bodies being a blurry, mess that looks like 1960's and 1970's chroma key.
@@Hawk_of_Battle Question: Ever heard of the Telltale Atheist and his Argueing that 'more Atheists should run for Office for this and that reason'? He does have impressive arguments and even if that one 'Message' of him isnt interesting, he has still amazing Content, tbh.
@@BlackburnBigdragon that's because tiktok have their own green screen filters. They use the app to edit all their videos. The tiktok green screen app doesn't require an actual green screen. It's always going to look blurry unless they use a proper green screen, with proper editing equipment. Tbh. Quality of the green screen isn't going to sway me one way or the other. The fact she had to get her boobs out for people to listen to her garbage is enough.
Welll goggle says almost nothing (there is exceptions like unit or currency conversion, actual time etc.). It just found some webpage that says something, but not Google.
Let's ask her again for that statement when she's hanging from a high-rise building with someone slowly cutting the rope. Or after pushing her out of a plane without parachute. I once read "there are no atheists in a crashing airplane". Not so sure about that anymore, but I guess that noone will call gravity irrelevant in the above situations.
She spends more time putting on make-up and setting up camera filters than she does actually researching anything she's talking about. Sounds about right for flat earth.
Oh, I have to disagree. It looks like she has done LOTS of research. She is repeating all the things uneducated flat-Earthers have said before her. And everyone knows, if you want the truth, don’t talk to an expert in the field. It’s best to as the neighborhood antivax Karen, the paranoid tinfoil wearer that never leaves the basement, or a politician.
It genuinely astounds me there are people like this walking around. You know; I've never been a fan of eugenics; but I'm starting to get where some were going with it.
She complains that science has no direct proof, then goes on to tell us how the world really is with no proof direct or indirect. Sometimes words fail me, cherry picking at its finest
She’s got no direct proof that her heart is beating inside her chest… she’s never “seen it” and never will… but I’m sure she doesn’t believe it is a tiny man with a tiny drum keeping time so that the rest of her body gremlins know how fast to work in order to keep her from doing the world a favor and keeling over.
How long before that conspiracy? 🤣 I can just picture some nut saying that there’s not many real humans and the majority of us are all robots sent by “Them“ 🤣😂
Honestly she's brilliant trying to tap into the conspiracy theorist base to start her tik tok career, it's typically filled with single men who would see her as their ideal gf, her following is going to grow rapidly, much to the detriment of science
That's exactly what I said I see a onlyfans account in her future so all the flattards can give her their money it's hilarious she's gonna be their new queen 👸 lol
What a ghastly slander; her fans only love her for her mind and staggering intellect... ... ... ... ... ...really staggering, that kind of intellect has difficulty putting one foot in front of the other. 🤣
That the site she was reading off of was 'physics for kids', and these are concepts she and others are still grappling with (and misunderstanding) as if they are at the frontier of knowledge, says all you need to know. Talk about a complete failure of an education system...
"Talk about a complete failure of an education system..." Yes, but she knows how to use TikTok and get her following. So she thinks she's a success in life.
@BOGDAN SERBAN While one cannot force people to learn, children are the same everywhere -- not inherently keen to be schooled -- and it is the job of the education system to find ways to reach children and encourage them to learn, whether that is by making learning 'fun', or whatever other approach. The populations of many other Western democracies are nowhere near as obscenely ignorant as many folks seem to be in the US/Canada (and the UK to a lesser degree), and what separates them is culture and policy, including different approaches to education and different popular attitudes toward intellectualism. So I would maintain that, yes, the education system failed these people. Taking this young woman, for example. Why did her science teacher(s) never catch that she clearly never properly understood the basic concepts of gravity and free-fall? How did she pass standardized tests at the end of primary and secondary school? There is absolutely no way an adult can successfully pass through a proper education system and hold those ideas about basic science, while simultaneously lacking any ability to think critically and skeptically.
When can probably find some comfort in the fact that a large portion of her male audience probably just agrees with her for other reasons but don’t actually believe in the non sense.
If the planets are just "luminaries", how are astronomers able to predict their movements using Newton's laws of motion and gravity? Does Rose have a model of luminary motion that can predict their movements as accurately, plus an explanation of why they move as they do?
@@christopherdean1326 ring lights someone has put in the dome so you can make TikTok videos in your car. This barbie doll reminds me of that guy that made stupid videos in his car because not even his wife could stand is nonsense
I’ve finally worked out the ultimate debunk for flerfs. If gravity wasn’t real and it all came down to density then we should observe that all the flerfs are at the bottom. They are simply the densest things ever observed!
Where would the denser stuff go to? Why wouldn't dense stuff go up? What keeps the denser stuff down? What even is down? I've got so many questions for them.
@@philmenzies2477 That's one of the huge paradoxes of the world. Although flearthers are full of hot air, they are also dense beyond imagination. Maybe Matt Powell can help here with his view of the world. Flearther shells (aka pressurized containers) are made of diamond, the densest and strongest subatomic particles known to man. Matt Powell and flearthers, two sides of the same coin coming together. BTW: as diamond consists of the densest subatomic particles, which makes diamond impenetrable, this also explains why flearthers will not listen to facts. Impenetrable. Only thing that penetrates a flearther shell are flearth ideas, they have negative density.
"Has it ever entered your mind that the clouds you see 'through' it are actually in front of it?" Classic! It is a terrible shame that she looks like that and still lands to the right of the Vicky Mendoza Diagonal. Tragic!
Had to do with a person for years, who had a similar illogical and/or magical thinking, not a proper flat earther, though. (Yet. Lost contact mostly, so maybe soon?) My point is: it's impossible to discuss with these people. And it's so exhausting. So here comes a huge thank you and a lot of respect for sticking to this topic! Personally I couldn't.
Ridiculous. "She's pretty so must be dumb and vain!". 🙄 This girl's mistaken and been conned by the flat Earth guru's. Do you comment about the looks of the men too? Unless it's a makeup tutorial, bringing up someone's makeup only makes you look like the one who didn't learn something important about how to treat people. How about watching Professor Dave's video on Logical Fallacies and learning a bit about ad hominem.
Technically, gravity was 'discovered' by humans the very first time that a human fell out of a tree. He (or she) may not have had an explanation for what had happened any deeper than "FFS, I won't do THAT again!", but they certainly noticed the effect!
True, it's possible that "hypnic jerk" you get when trying to sleep, that feeling of falling that makes you jolt awake, is a by-product of evolution that originally made sure we didn't fall out of trees while sleeping.
I really don't want the flat Earthers to go away anymore. Their confidence used to annoy me. But now I think it's funny. There's no threat that they'll be anything but a tiny loud minority. Keep them coming.
The moment someone says a theory is different from a fact is usually when I realize they have no idea what they are talking about. It's not the hypothesis of gravity, it's the theory, meaning it's supported by facts.
@@marcwilliams9824 yeah. A theory is a system by which a natural phenomena is explained using facts. Facts are observations and mathematical proofs. Facts themselves cannot explain nature, that's what theories do.
Well the reason its called a theory in science is we dont fully understand it yet. It doesnt mean its not real or not understood at all. The word theory is different in science from common verbage. The word in science for a 'theory' is hypothesis. A theory in science has to have proof and evidence in order to be a theory otherwise its a hypothesis. Hey, i dont make the rules.
@@desperado3236 that's not what a theory is at all. What you just described is a hypothesis. A theory is usually the basis for natural laws and are just as supported. To say that they aren't understood shows that you have little grasp of the definition.
What are you talking about? Im actually agreeing with you. What you are arguing is semantics. A theory has to have supporting evidence to it. It does not necessarily have to be 'true' whatever means. A theory is simply a hypothesis with actual evidence to it therefore making it more likely to be true. There is nothing that says it has to be true just that there is evidence supporting its true. Your conflating consensus with truth. Why you are arguing this is beyond me. Even though i agree with you in principle that consensus usually equals truth, its not always the case.
I've seen a lot of flat-earthers fail to explain what decides which direction is "down" if there's no gravity and falling is all just an effect of density and buoyancy (which in their world are just natural forces on their own I guess) but this is the first time I see one not even try to explain what causes things to fall and just assume that "falling" is some independent natural force. I mean, she's right about the air resistance and all that but how does that refute the force that causes the falling in the first place?
I like the theory where the "earth plane" (because remember there is no consistent model they use) is actually accelerating upwards at 9.8m² and that's where we actually get the measurement for the acceleration of gravity
@@block4562 I like that theory too because it's hilarious how if the earth has been doing this since it was created 6,000 years ago (which is of course what these people believe) it means that it would currently be moving at about 6,000 x the speed of light. I was however informed that only the Flat Earth Society pushes this theory and that the FES is a red flag controlled opposition and that "true flat earthers" don't believe this theory 😂
So, the first question answer is: “Then why is only the earth a surface and everything else is a light?” On the second question: “School text books are easily available, plus I don’t need to swim the entire ocean to say that it’s all water.” Number three: “Notice the guy spinning the weight always put it down, he never let go of it and watched it float into space.”
By her logic, the cheaper the camera the more realistic the image is. Better pull out my old digital 0.4 MP camera from 2004. It will show everything in it's truest form
That's what ghost hunters do. Get the worst possible potato camera available, and any anomaly they see on it is automatically a ghost. A $10,000 TV quality camera just doesn't pick up such sensitive 'energy'.
5:15 The Moon is actually illuminated by both the Sun AND the Earth. The bright side of the Moon is illuminated by the Sun, but you can tell the rest of the Moon (very faintly) thanks to the light that bounces off of Earth onto it.
Earthshine is brightest during an eclipse. Professional photographers have recorded it. I won't go into the equipment needed here but you can find the images easily enough.
Just because you have access to an audience on TikTok doesn't mean you should be listened to. This lady proves that
she is considered attractive if you pile on so much make up so you look like a barbie doll so she has a following, no mistake they are not following her cause she is smart.
agreed. I used to sub to Mike The Cop on UA-cam because he was funny. That was until he posted a video of some Karen sherif complaining that her child does not have a covid vaccine and is being discriminated against by the school. He thought she was a hero for doing it .
@@perry92964 she is attractive?
9:37 Eric Laithwaite developed the Linear Induction Motor
This lady's audience probably have her muted while watching😉
She just set back the "pretty doesn't mean dumb AF" movement back centuries.
She obliterated that movement so much that no one no longer even knew they existed.
that makeup looks EXPENSIVE
It's too bad for evolution that she is so pretty, she will reproduce and be able to keep her low intelligence genes in the pool.
It's what's on the inside that counts, and she's pretty grimy inside.
😅😅😅😅😊😅
The smug look on her face as she demonstrates how she has no idea what she's talking about is priceless
Yes - it not only hurts to listed to her inane drivel it is painful to look at her.
There was a time when crackpots and silly statements were marginalized. Oh internet, how you've saved us all in such a short time...
@@chriskelvin248 A few years ago I read something along the lines of, "my Grandmother said that years ago every village and town had its own idiot - then along came the internet, and every idiot could now communicate with every other idiot."
How true this anecdote is I couldn't say - there might not have been any Grandmother, however it's difficult to argue with the observation.
She might be under the impression that camera filters conceal stupid too.
Well done, Devin. I was struggling to detect any expression on her face at all. I suspect the botox injections doubled her IQ, though.
Bless you Dan. I don't know how you have the patience for this stuff
"Sometimes there's air resistance and sometimes there's not, therefore gravity does not exist." Is probably one of the most asinine flat-earth "proofs" I have ever witnessed.
Would 'bubbles of hot air' rising up in the atmosphere blow her mind?
I'd like her to explain why things move down, with or without air resistance, and not side to side.
There is nothing flat about Jenny, she triggers my lazy eyes.
Gravity was discovered at the same time they discovered air.
@@the98themperoroftheholybri33 But the tides have water moving side to side......
The moon's gravity 'pulls' water to the side,; this water bunches up and creates high tide.
Not a small feat for a 'lamp'.
It's funny that she's saying things are falling faster in a vacuum because there's no air resistance (resistance to what?) but forgets to explain why they're falling in the first place
Exactly like if it's density why don't the objects simply stay put or move in any other direction
I have gravity force which interacts with all women in the universe. Gravity force has no limit. All women in the world are being attracted. To my gravity
Any flaterther somehow forgets to explain that lmao
There's certainly no air resistance between her ears. :)
@@frankowalker4662 😂
I like how she devalues Google and then immediately uses it to make her point. Classic
She devalues nasa, yet still uses nasa to say that there are gas giants in our solar system.
@@MarceldeJong she also claims planets aren't planets... but "luminaries" then claims theres a 'luminary" covered in Water & "ripples", the type that you'd only find.. . On a PLANET.
@@MarceldeJong Yep. She's happy to have it both ways. Well which is it.. are they "illuminaries" or are they "gas giants"
@@designsonq1 but why are the luminaries round tho
@@nodramalama9531 To fool everyone into thinking the earth is round? I dunno, man, if mental gymnastics were an Olympic sport, these poeple would be taking home gold!
I actually saw Professor Eric Laithwaite do this demo in the 70's. A long time expert in gyroscopes he had worked on auto pilot systems during the war. He used the jumbo gyro to explain the preservation of angular momentum and how the reaction to any input force is offset by 90 deg to the disturbing force. He always made his talks highly entertaining and joked the lightening of the weight of the big gyro was like anti-gravity. He would had found it absolutely hilarous that this girl decided to ignore all the theory and be taken in by it.
I love his demonstrations on magnets and magnetic levitation
"Earth's core is Just another thing that you can't directly observe measure or test"
The exact same thing is true about her brain.
I think that 'flat earth observers might bo more interested in more observable parts of her. That is probably something she is relying on.
@@kingspeechless1607 all her brilliance is in her shirt.
What brain lol
beat me to it.
I guess adult video is the only adult thing she'll be capable of doing. And if anything smart ever came out of her mouth, it most certainly weren't words.
This girl is so confident that she is the first to come up with these questions and the first to provide the "true" answers. The Dunning-Kruger effect at its finest.
But ... it's not the Dunning-Kruger Effect, is it.
Confidence or ignorance?
@@dannyseville2543 the greater the ignorance the greater the confidence
She didn't come up with anything. She just parroted old flerf topics as an excuse to get her boob job on TikTok.
@@Kyrelel More the Dumpling-Kruger effect.
Give her a couple of years and she will blame gravity for ...all sort of things
Plus, they'll fall at the same rate!
😂😂😂
At least by then, she'll have less people listening to her. Not to sound crass, but there are a lot of people who would listen to anything a pretty woman says, no matter how batsh!t it is.
Best comments every lol
I was thinking the same. In her 60`s gravity is coming for her 😂
it hurts so bad, it's like dying...
"Gravity is the most irrelevant, unnecessary thing." Evil me wishes it was locally true just for her.
Yeah, my response was, 'She said, sitting on a chair.'
She will discover gravity in a very personal way in a decade or two when her globes begin to sag. Then again, they are probably plastic anyway.
I’m willing to bet that she still stands on a scale every morning, not realising that she is proving gravity right then. Mass has weight because of gravity.
It Will become relevant for her in a coupe of years, painfully so.
Here I was thinking she'd changed her name to gravity
Flat Earther: "Don't trust Google when it tells you about gravity"
Also Flat Earther: "Now look what Google has to say about air resistance"
The Earth: 🌎
Similarly with these fools: "We haven't gone deeper than 8 miles so we CANNOT know what's down there"
But also: "We've never been to the dome/firmament, or to the antarctic rim/edge, or to those 'luminaries', but we can be CERTAIN NASA lies to us"
And where would such "earth" be, hilarious globe-cultist goofball who still doesn't have a clue where he lives by 2022? Can you find even a single degree of curvature on this perfectly flat level plane, nincompoop?
@@grantm6514 At least, unlike the flat earthers. NASA has been to some of the places, including the Moon.
Wot? Google are the gravity experts! My first choice for gravity related questions like "What will happen if I jump off a cliff?"
@@grantm6514 I've never been to America, but what the hey, I'll take a chance on believing its there! Will I look silly if it turns out Columbus was just having a lol moment, and all that New York/western/Hollywood/Sitting Bull/Abraham Lincoln/Route 66/Elvis/Yellowstone/Disney/Grand Canyon stuff turns out to be just a load of bull put out by the fakers of the "USA society"! :D
The irony is strong with this one:
She says "Do we have any actual evidence, factual evidence of what is inside the Earth?"
AND yet she has NO "actual" evidence that the planets and the moon are just lights.
🤦♂🤣
But she has grainy pictures of "lights" from Google! Are you saying she's wrong? 🤦♂️😂🤣
i prove flat earth on my channel. and it is much better and disproves scifakeman. pls check out
Oh yeah...the same with without air things are falling with the same speed. But Jenny...when you're so self conscious about what you say, please explain:"Why are things falling down?". American kids are really not the brightest candles out there...😂😂😂
She does! If you zoom in with your smart phone you might see light spots where the planets are 🤣
I was expecting you to say we have no factual evidence that she has a brain.
When I start taking ANY advice let alone scientific advice from a barbie doll on tiktok, please just put me out of my misery!
There's nothing wrong with having questions, but people like her give off the impression that they don't care if there is or isn't scientific answers to their inquiries. They seem to believe that by merely asking the question they're answering it too. That's not how this works.
That is EXACTLY the strategy. They find someone that tells them "Don't trust anyone".
That warning makes this person 100% trustworthy, they can believe every word they say.
Next step: The person gives them a prefabricated list of rhethorical gotcha questions, telling them "when speak those out, that proves how smart you are. There is no answer to this question, no need to listen to any answers. Also not required to even understand the questions. You are a genius and always right when you stick to this script".
That's exactly what is happening here. The funny thing is they are all SOOOO persuaded what free, independent thinkers they are while they regurgitate these slogans blindly.
They could not tell you ANYthing beyond the literal text. They cannot formulate it in their own words, combine it with personal experience or integrate external information.
That is all detrimental to the dogma, because as long as this exists alone and unquestioned, it is perfect and consistent - exactly what these people long for. A simple "explanation" (i.e. "That is the Truth. Period") for everything.
Works for all these cults, for Creationism, Trumpism, climate change denial, anti-vaxxers, and so on. "When I persuade myself this is the Truth, then I am always right and all others are wrong - that new gut feeling is all I need to be happy".
What's the point of asking questions when you automatically reject any and all answers that don't fit into your religious indoctrination?
A tactic commonly known as poisoning the well.
@@tomasjallen It could be all the makeup poisoning she is experiencing too.
@@feedingravens I LOVE that you included all of those "isms" ... I couldn't agree more..
That 1666 year of gravity being discovered is the finest example of cherry picking I've ever seen. When I saw this, I immediately went to Google and typed "what year was gravity discovered". I got various results, some saying 1687, some simply saying 1680s, some saying 1665 and some 1666. Even on Jenny's own screen it says "around 1665" in bold and 1666 is just an alternative date. Yet out of all of these possible years, she picks the only one that suits her "satanic symbolism" narrative. Why doesn't she pick any of the other dates? Like I said, cherry picking at its finest.
Quite apart from the fact that gravity was never 'discovered' - it was there all the time! ☺
These people who see 666 everywhere. I wonder what the implication is... Gravity is satanic? The devil pulls stuff down?
That alone shows me she doesn't honestly believe what she's saying.
She's just doing the flerf thing. Saying what's expected or a flerf.
Also, these jackasses basically use any repetitive occurrence of the number 6 to mean the devil is involved. The "number of the beast" is supposed to be 666; not 1666, not 216, not 66, not 18, not a single 6 in three different numbers. It's literally just looking for anything they can twist to fit their claims.
I love picking these numerology idiots apart. Like.... oh, so 1666 is an evil devil number because 666 is a component? But we can discard the 1000 part safely, apparently. So is any number that has 666 as a component evil? Is 667? or 668? or 2480? or 4,501,024? They all have 666 as a component and some left over. How about multiples of 666? Are they evil too?
There's no faster way to expose their nonsense.
"Isn't it interesting that Mars and Venus look the same as these planets that they say are gas"
Someone needs to show her one of those "things that are secretly cake" videos. Just because two things look the same, does not make them the same. Additional information is needed.
And yet, Mars and Venus don’t look _quite_ the same as stars... Long ago (decades, yikes) I was lucky enough to go to an astronomy camp for one week. I already forgot lots of stuff, such as how to properly use a telescope with an equatorial mount, but I DO remember (particularly because that’s something one can observe every day) that the planets do not twinkle. Only stars do.
(If someone wants a non-NASA source for this, well, is it not written : Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star?)
@@Cecily-Pimprenelle That's odd, I thought scintillation was an atmospheric effect. Now I need to go away and check.
@@Cecily-Pimprenelle OMG Are you saying that even our CHILDREN'S SONGS are indoctrination!? 😮 /s
@@DavidSmith-vr1nb it is but the planets are not point sources so the effect is much less.
@@DavidSmith-vr1nb I quickly looked it up because it *_has_* been a long time, and apparently we’re both right? As in, it is indeed an atmospheric effect, but unless they’re low on the horizon, the twinkling of a planet would not be noticeable to the eye. I guess they gave us, bunch of teenagers, the simplified explanation, because we would not observe any low planets.
"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" has never been more true than in the information age when knowledge is accessible and ubiquitous, ironically.
People like her make me sad. You can be good looking and stupid as a bag of rocks and still be more successful than the average person who actually tries to be helpful to society.
You know what makes me sad, people who can't see a woman without commenting on their appearance.
@@treepotato9273 You know what makes me sick? Beta cucks desperate to get their daily white knighting done. It should be obvious this woman doesn't use her brains to attract the attention she clearly craves.
@@treepotato9273 Missed the point entirely
@@treepotato9273 Well, it's nice to know that you are happy most of the time.
i prove flat earth on my channel. and it is much better and disproves scifakeman. pls check out
I do love how she claims people who see through her weak arguments are indoctrinated. It's ironic really as that's precisely what she is and is trying to do to others.
That is what frightens me to be honest.
well you know when some one is trying to "brain wash you" they are going to start their argument with "you've been BRAINWASHED to believe such and such, but I AM going to tell you the TRUTH"
Realistically, I don't think she's indoctrinated with this FE crap at all. I 100% believe she's doing it to get that sweet, sweet internet clout. She realized that there's an unfortunately large audience of lonely, basement-dwelling neckbeards who happen to also subscribe to these conspiracy "theories"; and that by pandering to that group of demonstrably gullible individuals, she could provoke a reaction of "omg purdy girl shares my interests, lemme smash" and gain an essentially ready-made audience. Don't get me wrong, I give her points for finding a niche for herself, even if the only smashing her videos make me want to do is with my head against a brick wall... But yeah, guaranteed she doesn't believe any of this stuff at all, and is just taking advantage of the FE community to gain clout (which, to be fair, they're basically begging to be taken advantage of).
This girl is the poster child for Dunning-Kruger in action.
@@diemturner5755 I don't even think it's Dunning-Kruger. She is outright lying. She KNOWS she is lying. She's a con artist, manipulating stupid people for cash. You can tell by her face that she doesn't believe a single word she says.
I've personally used a very expensive telescope on a clear night to see Saturn, and let me tell you, it looks nothing like those first pictures. I can see how it would be hard to get a photo of it, but using the naked eye through one of these telescopes gives you a very clear image of the planet. I was blown away by how clear the image was. It looked very similar to the photos she says are "cartoons"
It's sad that these people preach "do your own research" and yet fail to do anything of the sort themselves.
usually do your own research just means go to sites that think like you!
@@jerenoize If Christian fundamentalism taught me anything as a child it's that you never listen to people with opposing viewpoints, they are just trying to lure you to satan.
Obviously I got away from all that but its sad what some kids are brainwashed into.
It disgusts me that these same people pretend like we are being indoctrinated by being taught science, when their entire M.O. is to do just that, indoctrinate kids using fear tactics.
@@jerenoize ...or their local preacher. Who accepts all forms of credit cards of course.
Not that hard to get a photo. Film it and stack the best frames. It will give you stunning details (if the atmosphere is not to turbulant)
Maybe we could crowd fund to get a decent telescope and we can each take turns visiting them and showing them 🤣
I was recently SHOCKED to see some worrying posts by someone I knew in High School that now thinks NASA is evil and I thought believed the earth is flat but turned out he believed something arguably even more ridiculous...that the earth is a toroidal sphere. What has happened to these poor souls...
Bad photo: Real
Good photo: Fake
That's some logic right there.
How hilarious that the last website link she pointed to-the one that said "Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact"- is a satirical website with a disclaimer at the top of the page:
"This satirical look at "only a theory" disclaimers imagines what might happen if advocates applied the same logic to the theory of gravitation that they do to the theory of evolution."
A perfect example of how flat earthers "do their own research." Find something that seems to support your personal belief and look no further.
Brilliant.
Confirmation bias, lack of critical thinking skills, and a deeply rooted psychological "need" to feel included and/or part of something special.
These, in a nutshell (no pun intended 😆,) work as a team to allow people to accept nonsensical concepts/claims as truth, while simultaneously blocking, not only their ability to identify and process false/unfounded claims, but also their desire to do so.
Truth≠fact
That's actually hilarious. It's sad to know other people can get to this point
Way late to the party, but my god is this a perfect explanation of the causes of the proliferation of anti- and counter-theory that has sprung up as a direct consequence of social media and the resultant shift in the components of self-worth, especially among the younger generations.@@brb7635
Actually, the site is not satirical. It's the NCSE - National Center for Science Education. The article you mention is ON the site, but is not the site itself.
Everyone who is as appalled as I am by the extremely low scientific literacy of the American public in general, and of creationists and flat-Earthers and moon-landing deniers and mudflood enthusiasts and so on, should consider giving NCSE at least their moral support, and if possible, their financial support as well. No, I do not work for them, or for anyone else. I am retired, and just a strong proponent of scientific literacy as being vital to our nation's future.
Wish I could duct tape her fingers together so she couldn’t make any air quotes
I wish every flat earther who says something like "gravity isn't real" would opt out from physics and will suddently rush towards the sky and disappear in the sky. I mean we couldn't even blame physics for that because it's constantly bullied by those people
They know they're talking bullshit but it gets them the attention they want.
Also why dont we drill deeper , one of the deepest we got was a bit over 12 km in 1970s and at that depth temp is round 180°C/356°F (estimation was round 100°C) , drill hole is in Russia near Finnish border , at that point "solid rocks" were already acting like plastic , so drilling it was not possible ... earth crust was estimated to be 35 km think , at the location of that drill hole .
One thing that drilling provided was idea of deep drill hole geothermic power plants , you need to steam up water , just pump it deep underground , pumping water uses way less energy than trying to heat that water by burning something .
Gravity was discovered when the first cave man fell off a cliff and was like, oh crap, this is a thing...
@@daeviant Exactly! Even animals like birds understood the nature of gravity millions of years before humans existed. We're so arrogant to believe that we are the only ones that can discover anything.
@@pete_lind Because the pressure and temperature melts the drill bit. We simply don't have the technology and there's no need to because seismology already provides the information.
Putting gravity in quotes totally negates her two best points.
"Gravity is the most unnecessary, irrelevant thing...." No, Barbie; that would be you.
I think a great challenge would be trying to find a flat earther who isn't into religion.
I don't know how that would work. The flat earth model contains so many features that would need to be deliberate that it is hard to explain how they came about without resorting to the divine.
Not 100% sure, but I think Dubay is an atheist.
@@davidcleary9510 He's also a charlatan. He knows the earth isn't flat but counts on the gullibility of people like Jenny-Rose to maintain his income.
@@CD_Character True, but most of them are. My favourite is Dave Weiss. He posts videos that literally debunk what he is saying, and his fans still treat him like the Messiah.
And yet she bemoans people believing things without direct evidence.
"The Moon is a light, that's why the closer you get up to it the more it fades away."
That's not how lights work Jenny. Please just look at a lightbulb from across the room then walk toward it.
hahaha she gets her info from tictok and google, then says google is lies, and she is a flat earther.......there is no way she'll figure out how to walk towards a light bulb unless a milenial with a certain number of followers shows her. your words mean zero to her. :)
What does she even mean by "the closer you get"? I'm willing to bet she doesn't believe in the space program, so with that assumption, no one has ever gotten "closer" to it.
@@jeffc5974 very good point. This is the same as every flat earther. Theyre just walking talking brain malfunctions.
That has to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard... and there is some pretty strong competition within the Flat Earther "sphere".
Flerfs have trouble with the idea that zooming in on something isn't somehow equivalent to physically approaching it.
„That’s how a sphere reflects light. A sphere illuminates itself“ she said, showing a friggin empty glass dome to tell us about how a solid rock sphere ‚should‘ behave.
Really sad how false information can ruin the life of some people. Thank you for the upload and keep on the good work against this, Dan! :)
@It's time to cook, Jesse! right, like the vaccine is safe and effective.
@@331moto "right, like the vaccine is safe and effective."
It is.
It has been proven to be so.
@It's time to cook, Jesse! over 1 million Americans died from COVID and at least half died due to ignorance. It's sad
Watching that video makes me wish that social media platforms would expand their terms of service to include banning this anti-science drivel.
Its so funny that when its a hot chick, its sad but when its some random middle age guy its, look at this moron what a joke
The talking Bratz doll has just punctuated something I've seen in many situations... the practical definition of "indoctrination" in society is: Teaching people from an early age anything you personally think isn't true.
Give her 10, maybe 20 years wearing no more support than a tube top, though, and she's gonna discover gravity in a way she doesn't appreciate.
🤣😂
🤣😂🤣
Her plastic surgeon will help her quest to prove gravity does not exist
LOL
“Talking Bratz doll”!!! I love it!!!
Put the feather and the golf ball back in the vacuum chamber, evacuate it to a vacuum, lay the chamber on its side, and let the feather and golf ball drop. Do that for every orientation, and note the direction they drop. Its always the same durection! Thats kinda destroying her claim.
These people are too unbelievably stupid they can't grasp the concepts needed to produce a vacuum chamber of any size. It takes some degree of intelligence to keep air out of a container in a way that lets you also remove air from it. All the glue and tape in the world wouldn't help you if you don't understand what gasses and liquid are or how they move to fill containers. It's very clear listening to these people, they do not understand enough physics to get those concepts at any workable level. At most these morons will say they can make a vacuum chamber and fail to produce so much as a penis pump as proof.
Great point, I'm using that one myself👍
Nobody is arguing about the rate at which things fall in a vacuum. The question is why they fall at all.
It is quite funny that they don't realize that Aristotle fixed that issue a few millenia ago. He fixed it in the wrong way, but he fixed it. He also argued that density makes objects fall, but he couldn't figure out why the objects would always fall in the same direction. And there were two options, either objects would fall towards greater densities, and since their is only air above them and to the side, they fall down (this is basically gravity) or the earth is the center of the universe and all objects fall towards the center. We know today that he picked the wrong option because this mostly was the birth of the geocentric model. But the option of gravity is a lot older than Newton. However Newton actually formed the vague ideas into a usable formula that allowed people to calculate the movement of planets. Before that those vague ideas were unfallsiable because they weren't able to make predictions.
@@missharry5727 because of gravity and the attraction between objects that have mass.
Arguments about density don't make sense because objects always fall in a certain direction and flat earth can't explain why.
I don't think she EVEN KNOWS what a vacuum chamber is.
She's got one in her head...
"Herp derp the furthest anyone's dug is eight miles"
Yeah. And nobody has ever cut my chest open, but I can still show you CT scans, PET scans, ultrasounds and X-Rays of the tumour that was in there.
i prove flat earth on my channel. and it is much better and disproves scifakeman. pls check out
Thank you! That's the exact same concept. Waves and radiation exist. We can measure them. If we couldn't measure seismic waves to deduce the inner workings of earth, how could we measure radiation and sound waves to know the inner workings of our body? Nobody had to cut me open before I needed heart surgery or broke my leg. We could all see it through measuring waves and radiation bursting through my body.
How is this an argument?
At least she and her doctor knows what her spheres are made out of.
Jenny is exactly the kind of person that makes you want to reach through the screen and slap them.
I want to slap those too 👀
Yeah, especially when she talked about the video with the spinning wheel. She haven't got a single clue about what's happening in that video.
Pfff, disproved gravity.... Hah 😂
OR motor boat them.....
@@christopherleveck6835 down terrible bro, go outside and get some bitches or something
.....with a baseball bat!
She seems like someone who hasn't been burdened with an overabundance of schooling.
What a kind way to call someone dumb af. :)
sadly a lot of these people get most of their "education" thru tiktok and facebook. the two greatest "educational institutions" on earth. This is our fault for allowing these dumb apps to become part of natural life. we give kids these things then blame them for being stupid. you give a chimp a gun, the poor critter has no idea bullets come out real fast and will kill, so you cant hold the chimp accountable for killing someone....its the person who gave the chimp the gun who is guilty.
@@mikeyb7263 She is what you would call an incredibly dumb blonde. :)
Do you just happen to possess a brown coat, Jay?🤣
That line is straight out of an episode of "Firefly!"🤣
@@That70sGuitarist if your hand touches metal, I swear, by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you.
She’s a great example of why the parents of trust fund kids need to be taxed into the ground.
I'm usually not a fan of the "eat the rich" sentiment, but you make a damn good point that I can't ignore...
@@caseytaylor1487 Exactly.
I only detest people who use their resources to make other people's lives worse.
Having money doesn't mean you're evil, it's being an elitist and sadistic douchebag with no regards for the life of others that make someone evil
It's amazing how much confidence they can project, I don't even have that much confidence 1=1. Truly staggering
Logical philosophers took years and numerous books to construct the proof that 1=1. It's several pages long, and impenetrable to the layperson.
1=1 is a theory not a fact xD scientist can and will never proof that 1 is actually Equal to 1 xD
I love how even her argument with the vacuum is logical but she got the wrong conclusion out of it because she doesn't understand anything.
@@battlelol4174 0 can be proven though! Anything times 0 is 0 therefore 0 is always 0. 0 equals 0. Where is my nobel prize ?
@@Mystra nah I don't trust you xD and math says any positive full number ^0 equals 1 and other numbers ^0 equal 0 so 0^0 can be 0 and 1 there fore no Nobel prize for you xD it is long ago I had math so no blame for any wrong statement
@@battlelol4174 lol
As a geologist I'm super happy you brought up the P-wave S-wave example! Something I've wished I could show these flat-earthers for a long time!
Josh, you're too optimistic! Actually flat-earthers fail to explain sunsets, P-wave and S-wave are completely out of the reach of their minds...
We’re taught about this in high school in my country. Maybe something to add to the American curriculum ?
Also, flat earthers are bad at history. Plinus went on and on in his Historiae Naturalis about how we know the earth is round, how much its diameter is, how to measure and calculate it… He died in the Pompei eruption 2000 years ago.
@@Laure__Line It's definitely in American curriculum, at least it was when I was in school.
I would love to see them try to explain earthquakes...
@@Laure__Lineyea it’s in the American curriculum, I feel like that’s pretty obviously not the problem though as these people say stuff like the earth is flat and gravity is fake which are pretty clearly taught at a young age
"I'm gonna address a question that I get constantly" - I seriously doubt people actually asking here anything, at all.
I hope some day a close friend of hers pulls her back and says, "you need to stop this". It's really painful to watch all this.
Good point! You're quite right. No one has EVER asked her a science question 😅
I'd ask her for a date.
To do some research...you know 😋
I'm sure I'll discover two giant planets and a vacuum in a chamber
She doesn't seem like the type to surround herself with smart people
@@grogdizzy5814 The questions would be from her TikTok followers, but most comments on her page are so generic that I am not sure whether they're real people or just bots.
Can you imagine being hot and still people run from you like you are radioactive
The confidence she has...when if she looked through a telescope of equal value to the Nikon P1000 she could debunk herself.
My $100 telescope would blow her mind
Yeah but she won’t, or even if she does, she’ll say look proof it’s out of focus, so it must not be a planet 😂
Any picture taken by a proper telescope is automagically CGI. Problem solved!
@@Astronomy_Live don’t forget the person beyond the telescope is a nasa shill 🤣
@@alexk4753 Dammit where is my pay cheque
Geologist here:
Instruments can see beyond human senses, it's why we use them. Seismology explains this by analyzing compression waves, which can only travel through physical objects and their velocities which are affected by the properties of materials. Instruments can sense these waves on the other side of the planet and record their velocities, indicating what they're traveling through. Every earthquake furthers our understanding of the planet.
The same way the wavelengths of light reflected of foreign planetary surfaces can indicate the composition of its atmosphere? I'm not a scientist honest question I'm not sure I understood that correctly.
@@jaydru2236 Absolutely, astronomical spectroscopy is how we determine the composition of distant objects! Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey excellently explains this in episode 5.
@@thjacobi2 thankyou for that I will have to check that out. Not a scientist as I said but it's wise to learn about our universe and by extension our place in it. It's quite humbling to say the least.
She doesn’t believe in gravity now.. just give it a few years.. 😅
Hah
Good one
Difficult to think of ways to sway people like this. They don’t accept any evidence…so where does that leave you?
She can’t actually believe herself.
“Gravity is the most irrelevant, unnecessary thing.”
I’d *love* to see her prove that statement.
What I don't understand about flat earthers is that they are so close to the answer. They ask these questions, but then don't bother to actually look up the answer. Their minds just work by asking a question and then immediately drawing a conclusion. Absolutely baffles me.
I choose not to understand (thistopic), that means the earth is flat. That's the conclusion from people who struggle to find brain power for thinking and breathing at the same time.
The exact same principle applies to theists too. Which is why there is a stunning intersection between theists and flat eathers.
Like, she understood that in a vacuum things fall at sane speed due to lack of air resistance. So why stop thinking!!! Flerfers always go on about density but this girl accepted a vacuum chamber is a good place for an experiment. Ok what I causing the objects to fall down and not upwards?
Love how she proves the very things she is trying to debunk. Also, gravity wasn't "discovered" by Newton, it was mathematically proven by Newton. People were well aware of gravity long before then.
It was discovered, but they seem to think discovered means "invented" as in, it didn't exist before discovery.
Actually, it was discovered by Newton. Look it up, skippy!
Gravity was definitely his discovery, but he invented the cat flap and milled edge coins lol 😂
@@-WhizzBang- wasn't disputing the who of it, just the difference between "discovering" and showing the proof of how it works. Maybe you should read the whole comment next time
@@Gothmogdabalrog I think you are the one who needs to re read your own comment, Skippy. You obviously didn't look it up! He Discovered it, and he didn't prove how it works, they still don't fully understand how it works, even today. He just proved it's existence.
Try to think before commenting again, or at least run it by an adult first....
“The moon is a light. Ok? That’s why the closer you get up to it, the more it fades away.”
What the ever loving hell is she talking about?! Lights fade away as you get closer to them?
Regarding the Earth's core Jenny Rose asks, "So do we have any actual scientific proof or evidence?". Well, magma might be a good clue.
I’m hearing Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers movies saying “Magma” right now…. Lmao
"liquid hot" 😂
I suppose magma doesn't exist either, it's just one of those hoaxes..
At 6:25, when she quotes the sentence saying that we will never have direct evidence, the very next sentence, which she even shows on screen, says that scientists use seismic waves. So either she is phenomenally stupid - or she knows quite well for yourself that what she says is nonsense and only relies on her audience to be phenomenally stupid...
this broad wouldn't know what magma was, she'd probably think it was a Marvel villain; the horrible Dr. Magma who wants to melt the earth.
The saddest fact is these people aren't DUMB, they're aggressively choosing to be IGNORANT and not study the real science.
No, they're dumb.
Some of them are demonstrably dumb, and not all of them are ignorant. Some of them are grifters, which requires awareness.
Choosing to be ignorant is very dumb tho.
People like her want to feel special, superior to everybody else. They know THE TRUTH and you're all just SHEEP, you know?
Or blissful, @@Lezappen😊
8:50 "Objects in a vacuum chamber are denser than the air above and below it" - Objects in a vacuum chamber are not as dense as this girl
She definitely thinks she's the smartest person in the room. I hope she didn't reproduce 🤞
The irony of someone using a ton of make-up and camera filters to try and draw in thirsty blokes, who is trying to describe NASA's imagery as 'cartoons' and 'fake'😆
Tbf, it'll work, she'll have lots of thirsty men following her
I have actually stumbled into her lives a few times and her absolute confidence while being absolutely wrong is astounding.
If you flash enough cleavage, you can get away with that.
"Absolutely wrong"? About what? Any proofs to such clownish statement, hilarious blabbermouth?
@@maladetts + First of all, if you're seeking proof, you should be on a mathematics channel. The concept of proofs is foundational to mathematics. Science does not offer or claim to "prove" things. That tells me what your level of understanding is, right off the bat.
Second of all, her astronomical images are ridiculous. I'm no astronomer but my little $400 telescope produces vastly better images, and I'm not even on a mountain top, which is where most decent terrestrial observations are done, due to the bottom mile or two of atmosphere being such a distorting factor in astronomical observation.
But I do know a little bit about the structure of our globe. I don't know where ScimanDan got 150 seismograph stations from, so I'm not going to guess. But I can tell you we have a lot of seismometers out there. Mount St Helens alone has about 140. Internationally if there are about 2000 ocean floor seismometers and over 11,000 land-based seismometers networked around the globe. Just as we do not have to drill into a pregnant mother to image the baby in her uterus using sound waves, we can do quite accurate acoustic tomography of the interior of our globe. These instruments are sensitive and precise, which is why the USGS knows Lil Kim has been playing with nukes in North Korea before the DOD does. And it's why we can tell the difference between one of those nukes and a volcanic eruption in Indonesia.
Absolutely none of that would be possible on a flat Earth. And it's why we know the structure and composition of our planet in such detail.
When there is an earthquake in Alaska, seismometers all over the world receive that acoustic information at very specific times. Absolutely none of that would make any sense or be even possible on this girl's Pizza Earth.
@@47f0
A clown here dropped a wild claim out of nowhere that all the facts the lady presented are "absolutely wrong" just because he did not like them and they ruin his cozy globe cult, I guess - I ask how so, and you're writing me a clownish bunch of unrelated nonsense about "mathematics" and "mathematics channels" while proceeding to speak about seismology and astronomy, and not mathematics somehow; shocking your cultist buddies here that science "does not prove anything"; and playing a psychic here about my "level of understanding" of god knows what? What this tells me right off the bat is that you're a quirky goofball with serious mental issues, to say the least.
You're on a site that offers endless channels of astronomy observations - you are welcome to put your money where your mouth is and disprove them all by setting up your own channel and uploading any images that would be "better" or "different" than the ones we've had. What's exactly "ridiculous" to you about the real-life astronomical observations is not clear at all from your vague incoherent gibberish. You could have tried and explained it IN ACTUAL WORDS.
We all have been taught sheer nonsense about the "structure" of a "globe" that doesn't exist and no one can show in real life, with the only reality that we all directly observe, document and experience at all times being a stationary flat level plane.
Whatever knowledge any of us has about any fairy-tales and any mythology is not related to the physical objective material reality where we have a constant unchanged unbent horizontal level and not a single degree of magic curvature to be found.
How does seismology that all is happening on a flat level plane excuse your outdated debunked absurd globe myths in the 21st century in the era of human flight, is absolutely unclear. Your clownish mantras that the observed documented experienced reality "cannot" somehow "be possible" are based on what? Your groundless cultist indoctrinated beliefs you cannot let go and hold dear to your heart despite all factual reality all around you?
There is no such thing as "tomography of the interior of your globe" you are making up on the go. You don't have even a slightest degree of curvature to provide to even START dreaming of any globes, moreover such that would be dashing past multiple new Polar stars and crumbling constellations (which you also must be seeing in your "little telescope"?).
NO matter how many times you repeat nonsensical phrases "our globe" and "our planet", our flat level plane WILL NOT become those in real life and you'll never provide a single evidence to such made-up magic.
If we're speaking of POSSIBILITIES, nothing we have in our world would be possible at all on a spinning pear flying through space.
The globe cult itself is so nonsensical and absurd that it does not make any sense - so you should refrain from even appealing to sense: something that you completely reject and deny.
Your clownish nonsense expressions like "pizza earth" and "Lil Kim playing with nukes" tell right off the bat about your level of education and cognitive abilities overall. The only state on earth that PLAYED with nukes in a criminal lethal mass-murdering manner was the United States, or "Lil Uncle Sam", which has been occupying half of Korea where it committed endless atrocities in the early 50's and since then has been waging a genocide on the northern part of the country through a sanction war. The reconnaissance of what's going on across the 38th parallel is done quite simply - and it does not involve or require your clownish eggplant-earth or pear-earth fairy-tales, pizza-loving chump.
Now if you wanna be talking about earthquakes and seismology at all, learn what a PLATE is, for starters.
Flerfers are the very best examples of Dunning-Kruger in action.
Just what I need an ignorant youngster to point out how I have been indoctrinated. People who do not understand, trying to make their ignorance into knowledge. Thanks Dan and keep up the good work.
She's projecting hard. Potential fascist character trait.
"Like, I'm good at science because I'm a Sagittarius so....yeah."
Jeez, as a physics student i wish I was indoctrinated. Then I would'nt have had to sit through the incredibly long and tedious Lab Practicals, where I was hardly supported by the Tutors and had to figure out everything by myself from some loose tasks.
Somebody should ask her - did she come up with those explanations on her own, or is she just parroting other videos that she's seen online? If the latter, wouldn't that mean she's been indoctrinated, just in a different way? Even if the former is true, she's only getting half of the scientific process. It's not enough to ask questions and posit an explanation; she has to actually prove her assertions.
oh dont worry theres plenty of ignorant dinosaurs running around peddling this shit.
its from the old people after all isnt it. not like they made sure to fund education snd put a leash on the churches.
It's mind-boggling that she understood that air resistance was the reason that things usually fall at different rates but don't in a vacuum yet she totally missed the part where they wouldn't fall at all without gravity in the first place. She stated that air resistance was an upward force but seemed oblivious that there would have to be a greater downward force in order for them to fall downwards. It's hard to fathom such stupidity.
The old, "all holes are shallow" objection? Why do flat earthers think that you have to physical visit something to know anything about it? Standing on the Earth has not helped them determine its nature.
Strange considering how knowledgeable they claim to be about the South Pole (AKA the you can't go there zone)
If she ever gets pregnant and goes for a routine scan, they'll have to drill into her because that's the only way they can know anything.
Her: "do we have any scientifically evidence of what's inside the earth"
Also her: I feel like it's not true, so it's not true
She basically found a video of somebody showing something that suited her narrative and also said "scientific fact". She was so happy she could shove the term "scientific fact" in the face of people she was trying to get at.
Bless her.
@@peekster0 Yeah, I had a good chuckle at that part right before I facepalmed so hard my eyeballs fell out. I mean how hard is it to understand gyroscopic motion?
@@peekster0 Cherry-picking and quote mining, the flearth-101
That one sentence right there:
"Gravity is the most irrelevant and unnecessary thing",
- is quite possibly the dumbest thing I have ever heard anyone say. It's kinda the opposite! 😆 If it wasn't for gravity, none of us would exist, nor would anything that makes the universe what it is either! Massive face palm moment right there 🙄
"I can't see gravity so it doesn't exists, but there's a magic sky daddy for reals"
The only reason why her head doesn't float away is because she had ballast added right below the neck.
Of course she doesn't believe gravity is real, she probably keeps a couple rocks in her pockets to stop all that air in her head from carrying her off 😏
If gravity is not real, why is she using a piece of clothing to hold her uh....planets in place to begin with? Shouldn't they never sag as gravity doesn't exist?
@@BrunodeSouzaLino If you look closely at them, her "planetary bodies" have been artificially enhanced to defy gravity.
Another 10 years and she won’t be able to deny gravity. Enjoy the tube top while you can.
I certainly did. ❤ 😅
She should leave the science to science-y people and stick to fashion advice or dating tips, or even gaming vids. She might do alright. This is just going to give her a reputational hangover. 🤦♂️😖
I feel so bad for the children of these people who will most likely want to learn more about science and how things work but get bombarded by nonsense and misunderstanding by their parents who have been indoctrinated into this insanity
I believe their kids won't be curios about real science and that is really sad.
One of them taught their 4 year old, to call people who believe in Globe Earth, a globetard. That kid is gonna have fun when they get to school.
Man if I ever have kids I will make sure they dont grow up listening to this non-sense. Science first!
You are assuming those unvaccinated kids survive.
Very acute description of globe-cultist dummies! Thank you. So true.
I guess she plans on getting through life on her looks... 'Cause she certainly won't be able to get through it with her brains.
With her looks she'll have lots of thirsty men following her, wouldn't be surprised if she's got a good sized following
The clip of Professor Eric Laithwaite at the Royal Institution Lectures in 1974 brought back some memories. He was suggesting that gyroscopes did not obey Newtonian motion and could be used as a form of reactionless propulsion. He was very entertaining and the lectures were very popular among the science geek teenagers like me they were aimed at. He was also wrong as he’d later admit, gyroscopes do behave in accordance with Newtonian mechanics. He would have never denied the existence of gravity.
The Earth has no Core????Her head has no Core!!!!
I've seen Mars with my telescope, sure it isn't THAT powerful, but I did see a round object, not a fuzzy blob of light, same with Saturn and Jupiter. This is with a basic reflector telescope I got at toysrus for $110. Even with JUST my camera, using the infinity setting I was able to see Jupiter and its moons, and they looked NOTHING like those "luminaries" flat earthers claim.
Shocking right? That Flearthers only use their bottom shit amateur photos and use them as "absolute proof" of how it actually should look like. And claiming everything else must be fake. Such bellends.
She knows. She's just mocking the facts in order to empower like-minded people.
@@mrpositronia I'm not sure if she really knows. Do you know her?
It's simple really, followers of such bullshitters will never critically think about and fact check anything they say They are gullible fools who like to think they are special and will just accept it.
@@nalim27 I always give the benefit of the doubt. But it's likely that she doesn't know. 😬
The fact that all this lady’s bits of “evidence” and articles that she keeps moving from side to side to show us on her green screen are all the bare minimum, surface level Google snippets/summaries rather than the actual source articles themselves… tells me everything I need to know.
Honestly I'm surprised she's even that tech savvy.
Almost EVERY Tik Tok person's videos are like that when they have a green screen. They're all recording with their cell phones, so they always move their cameras all over the place to point them at themselves, then the wall behind them, and then back and forth over and over again. Whenever I see one of these videos, they make me seasick. They won't keep their cameras still because they HAVE to get their faces on that camera, but editing the stuff they want to show to pop up on the screen takes too much effort. Much easier to just move the camera all over the place to show the wall behind you. Also, NONE of them do the green screen right, resulting in the edges of their faces and bodies being a blurry, mess that looks like 1960's and 1970's chroma key.
@@Hawk_of_Battle Question: Ever heard of the Telltale Atheist and his Argueing that 'more Atheists should run for Office for this and that reason'?
He does have impressive arguments and even if that one 'Message' of him isnt interesting,
he has still amazing Content, tbh.
@@BlackburnBigdragon that's because tiktok have their own green screen filters. They use the app to edit all their videos. The tiktok green screen app doesn't require an actual green screen. It's always going to look blurry unless they use a proper green screen, with proper editing equipment. Tbh. Quality of the green screen isn't going to sway me one way or the other. The fact she had to get her boobs out for people to listen to her garbage is enough.
Yeah, why listen to any actual facts, when you don't even wish to know anything in the first place, clownish ignoramus.
" Just like google says " - Gets her info from google. Ugh.
Welll goggle says almost nothing (there is exceptions like unit or currency conversion, actual time etc.). It just found some webpage that says something, but not Google.
Space IS NOT a vacuum earth IS a pressurized system, and earth IS NOT a vacuum as well...
"Gravity is irrelevant." What a brilliant statement!
Wait till her boobs go south when she is 70y old....
Especially hilarious after she forgot to explain what is causing the downwards movement of objects in a vacuum in the first place.
Let's ask her again for that statement when she's hanging from a high-rise building with someone slowly cutting the rope. Or after pushing her out of a plane without parachute.
I once read "there are no atheists in a crashing airplane". Not so sure about that anymore, but I guess that noone will call gravity irrelevant in the above situations.
It's such a shame seeing people like Jenny who could have a good thing going for them waste time on this nonsense! Thanks for the upload, Dan! 🙂
I couldn't agree more, a waste of time she will never get back.
i prove flat earth on my channel. and it is much better and disproves scifakeman. pls check out
@@twoperonitony so she's deliberately trying to make people stupid for money? ... Despicable. What a waste of botox that person must me.
Yeah she could be on Onlyfans making a ton!
@@WightBoyLuke You just beat me to that comment by about 30 seconds.
She spends more time putting on make-up and setting up camera filters than she does actually researching anything she's talking about. Sounds about right for flat earth.
Oh, I have to disagree. It looks like she has done LOTS of research. She is repeating all the things uneducated flat-Earthers have said before her.
And everyone knows, if you want the truth, don’t talk to an expert in the field. It’s best to as the neighborhood antivax Karen, the paranoid tinfoil wearer that never leaves the basement, or a politician.
It genuinely astounds me there are people like this walking around. You know; I've never been a fan of eugenics; but I'm starting to get where some were going with it.
She complains that science has no direct proof, then goes on to tell us how the world really is with no proof direct or indirect.
Sometimes words fail me, cherry picking at its finest
She’s got no direct proof that her heart is beating inside her chest… she’s never “seen it” and never will… but I’m sure she doesn’t believe it is a tiny man with a tiny drum keeping time so that the rest of her body gremlins know how fast to work in order to keep her from doing the world a favor and keeling over.
How long before that conspiracy? 🤣
I can just picture some nut saying that there’s not many real humans and the majority of us are all robots sent by “Them“ 🤣😂
@@mackertheman
Ba-doom, ba-doom, ba-doom, ba-doom… the rhythm of “them.”
Honestly she's brilliant trying to tap into the conspiracy theorist base to start her tik tok career, it's typically filled with single men who would see her as their ideal gf, her following is going to grow rapidly, much to the detriment of science
shell soon be selling her bath water.
That's exactly what I said I see a onlyfans account in her future so all the flattards can give her their money it's hilarious she's gonna be their new queen 👸 lol
I can see the comments:'10/10 a true unwoke wife material high value real female'
@@juanausensi499 oh God that's too accurate lol
What a ghastly slander; her fans only love her for her mind and staggering intellect...
...
...
...
...
...really staggering, that kind of intellect has difficulty putting one foot in front of the other. 🤣
That the site she was reading off of was 'physics for kids', and these are concepts she and others are still grappling with (and misunderstanding) as if they are at the frontier of knowledge, says all you need to know. Talk about a complete failure of an education system...
I feel your pain.
"Talk about a complete failure of an education system..."
Yes, but she knows how to use TikTok and get her following. So she thinks she's a success in life.
@BOGDAN SERBAN While one cannot force people to learn, children are the same everywhere -- not inherently keen to be schooled -- and it is the job of the education system to find ways to reach children and encourage them to learn, whether that is by making learning 'fun', or whatever other approach. The populations of many other Western democracies are nowhere near as obscenely ignorant as many folks seem to be in the US/Canada (and the UK to a lesser degree), and what separates them is culture and policy, including different approaches to education and different popular attitudes toward intellectualism.
So I would maintain that, yes, the education system failed these people. Taking this young woman, for example. Why did her science teacher(s) never catch that she clearly never properly understood the basic concepts of gravity and free-fall? How did she pass standardized tests at the end of primary and secondary school? There is absolutely no way an adult can successfully pass through a proper education system and hold those ideas about basic science, while simultaneously lacking any ability to think critically and skeptically.
Maybe if she spent as much time trying to understand science as she does make-up and push-up bra shopping she would have a doctorate by now
When can probably find some comfort in the fact that a large portion of her male audience probably just agrees with her for other reasons but don’t actually believe in the non sense.
If the planets are just "luminaries", how are astronomers able to predict their movements using Newton's laws of motion and gravity? Does Rose have a model of luminary motion that can predict their movements as accurately, plus an explanation of why they move as they do?
Yes, she has. It's called "muh holy book".
Of course not, because, god.
I don't think she bothers building a model. They're luminaries, that's all you need to know.😂
I'd settle for an explanation of WTF "luminaries" are......
@@christopherdean1326 ring lights someone has put in the dome so you can make TikTok videos in your car. This barbie doll reminds me of that guy that made stupid videos in his car because not even his wife could stand is nonsense
I’ve finally worked out the ultimate debunk for flerfs. If gravity wasn’t real and it all came down to density then we should observe that all the flerfs are at the bottom. They are simply the densest things ever observed!
Not sure that is true. They all seem to be full of hot air.
Nope. They would float because of the lack of a brain 🙂
Where would the denser stuff go to? Why wouldn't dense stuff go up? What keeps the denser stuff down? What even is down?
I've got so many questions for them.
@@paulelderson934 Down is towards the South Pole, at least that's where the water flows when they pour it on to a ball or model globe.
@@philmenzies2477 That's one of the huge paradoxes of the world. Although flearthers are full of hot air, they are also dense beyond imagination.
Maybe Matt Powell can help here with his view of the world. Flearther shells (aka pressurized containers) are made of diamond, the densest and strongest subatomic particles known to man.
Matt Powell and flearthers, two sides of the same coin coming together.
BTW: as diamond consists of the densest subatomic particles, which makes diamond impenetrable, this also explains why flearthers will not listen to facts. Impenetrable. Only thing that penetrates a flearther shell are flearth ideas, they have negative density.
I've never seen someone be so sure of themselves while also being so unbelievably wrong at the same time 🤣
Really? You need to watch some of the other flat earth nonsense videos then! :)
You need to check out Dan's video of Ken Cheesy Hands.
Oh my...that was painful. This poor girl did not pay attention in school.
"Has it ever entered your mind that the clouds you see 'through' it are actually in front of it?" Classic! It is a terrible shame that she looks like that and still lands to the right of the Vicky Mendoza Diagonal. Tragic!
Had to do with a person for years, who had a similar illogical and/or magical thinking, not a proper flat earther, though. (Yet. Lost contact mostly, so maybe soon?)
My point is: it's impossible to discuss with these people. And it's so exhausting.
So here comes a huge thank you and a lot of respect for sticking to this topic! Personally I couldn't.
If Jenny spent as much time learning real science as she spends if front of a mirror, she wouldn't be so damned wrong all the time.
I believe her makeup is eating away her brain.
If she spent one evening looking through a telescope (with some help from a person who knows what they’re doing) she might cease to be such a moron.
If "gravity" is a fictional force according to Jen, why does her hair fall down instead floating in all directions?
Ridiculous. "She's pretty so must be dumb and vain!". 🙄 This girl's mistaken and been conned by the flat Earth guru's. Do you comment about the looks of the men too? Unless it's a makeup tutorial, bringing up someone's makeup only makes you look like the one who didn't learn something important about how to treat people. How about watching Professor Dave's video on Logical Fallacies and learning a bit about ad hominem.
@@johnstirling6597 nah, gravity obvs doesn’t exist, otherwise how does makeup stay on the face without falling down?
I love the "side by side images" that are actually above and below. Left and right is a concept normal children learned before kindergarten.
My favorite part of these type of flat earth videos is that they say everyone is lying, but then pick and choose google searches to show as "proof"
While using google themselves to proof their points as well. So should or shouldn't we believe google now?
Why is her image glitching so much? Is she real or just a Creaky "See - Gee - Eye"?
I don't know Dan, I'm sure she knows a thing or two about fake spheres
Her spheres must also be fake
@@peekster0 Duh-doy my friend
I haven't watched this yet and I already know she's a vacuous airhead with fake diddies!
@@peekster0 yes that's the joke, thank you mr genius.
Technically, gravity was 'discovered' by humans the very first time that a human fell out of a tree. He (or she) may not have had an explanation for what had happened any deeper than "FFS, I won't do THAT again!", but they certainly noticed the effect!
Cats likes to experiment with gravity aswell ;)
True, it's possible that "hypnic jerk" you get when trying to sleep, that feeling of falling that makes you jolt awake, is a by-product of evolution that originally made sure we didn't fall out of trees while sleeping.
I really don't want the flat Earthers to go away anymore. Their confidence used to annoy me. But now I think it's funny. There's no threat that they'll be anything but a tiny loud minority. Keep them coming.
The moment someone says a theory is different from a fact is usually when I realize they have no idea what they are talking about. It's not the hypothesis of gravity, it's the theory, meaning it's supported by facts.
But a theory IS different from a fact. That's why we use the two different words.
@@marcwilliams9824 yeah. A theory is a system by which a natural phenomena is explained using facts. Facts are observations and mathematical proofs. Facts themselves cannot explain nature, that's what theories do.
Well the reason its called a theory in science is we dont fully understand it yet. It doesnt mean its not real or not understood at all.
The word theory is different in science from common verbage.
The word in science for a 'theory' is hypothesis.
A theory in science has to have proof and evidence in order to be a theory otherwise its a hypothesis.
Hey, i dont make the rules.
@@desperado3236 that's not what a theory is at all. What you just described is a hypothesis. A theory is usually the basis for natural laws and are just as supported. To say that they aren't understood shows that you have little grasp of the definition.
What are you talking about? Im actually agreeing with you. What you are arguing is semantics.
A theory has to have supporting evidence to it. It does not necessarily have to be 'true' whatever means. A theory is simply a hypothesis with actual evidence to it therefore making it more likely to be true.
There is nothing that says it has to be true just that there is evidence supporting its true. Your conflating consensus with truth.
Why you are arguing this is beyond me.
Even though i agree with you in principle that consensus usually equals truth, its not always the case.
I've seen a lot of flat-earthers fail to explain what decides which direction is "down" if there's no gravity and falling is all just an effect of density and buoyancy (which in their world are just natural forces on their own I guess) but this is the first time I see one not even try to explain what causes things to fall and just assume that "falling" is some independent natural force. I mean, she's right about the air resistance and all that but how does that refute the force that causes the falling in the first place?
Yup this mysterious falling force or acceleration exists to their mind, but it’s totally not gravity!
I like the theory where the "earth plane" (because remember there is no consistent model they use) is actually accelerating upwards at 9.8m² and that's where we actually get the measurement for the acceleration of gravity
@@block4562 I like that theory too because it's hilarious how if the earth has been doing this since it was created 6,000 years ago (which is of course what these people believe) it means that it would currently be moving at about 6,000 x the speed of light. I was however informed that only the Flat Earth Society pushes this theory and that the FES is a red flag controlled opposition and that "true flat earthers" don't believe this theory 😂
@@block4562 9.8m/s²
“Yes but why does it Fall DOWNWARDS?”
Even your $1000 telescope can take better pictures of Saturn than the one she showed!
Price doesn't indicate superior functionality.
Imagine how disappointed her parents must be
So, the first question answer is: “Then why is only the earth a surface and everything else is a light?”
On the second question: “School text books are easily available, plus I don’t need to swim the entire ocean to say that it’s all water.”
Number three: “Notice the guy spinning the weight always put it down, he never let go of it and watched it float into space.”
By her logic, the cheaper the camera the more realistic the image is.
Better pull out my old digital 0.4 MP camera from 2004. It will show everything in it's truest form
That's what ghost hunters do. Get the worst possible potato camera available, and any anomaly they see on it is automatically a ghost. A $10,000 TV quality camera just doesn't pick up such sensitive 'energy'.
Mega Pixels doesn't indicate picture quality.
@@PutsOnSneakers nope, but almost anything is better than a 0.4 MP camera from 2004
5:15 The Moon is actually illuminated by both the Sun AND the Earth. The bright side of the Moon is illuminated by the Sun, but you can tell the rest of the Moon (very faintly) thanks to the light that bounces off of Earth onto it.
Earthshine is brightest during an eclipse. Professional photographers have recorded it. I won't go into the equipment needed here but you can find the images easily enough.
The "earthshine" light we see on the moon that is reflected from Earth is called albedo. Cool word.
You cannot convince me that we are collectively smarter in the "information age."