Your Questions, Answered: Are Electric Cars Safe To Ride In With All That Electromagnetic Radiation?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лип 2024
- We often get asked questions by our viewers -- and (although we can't answer them all) we do our best to answer them, either by commenting to the questions directly, firing off a quick email, or using the question as a topic for a video.
In the last couple of months, we've had several people ask about the health risks associated with electric car ownership, specifically the risks associated with electromagnetic radiation from the car's power electronics and motors.
To put those fears to bed, we decided to make this video explaining why you shouldn't be worried at all.
Don't forget to like, comment and subscribe, and support us using the links below.
Buy the team a coffee -- or a meal! ko-fi.com/transportevolved
Follow the show on Mastodon: mastodon.transportevolved.com/
Buy Transport Evolved SWAG : teespring.com/stores/transpor...
Join our Discord Channel: / discord
Support us on Patreon: / transportevolved
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "2023 Kia Niro EV: Why You'll Want To Drive This"
• 2023 Kia Niro EV: A Fa...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ - Авто та транспорт
yep, the biggest radiation hazard comes through the window. Very well explained. The commutating frequency of an EV motor is low. At 20,000 rpm, i.e. screaming, the motor is revolving at 333 revs per second. multiply by the number of poles, as a example, 6, you have a switching frequency of 2 kHz. This is audio frequencies and off the top of my head quick estimate, a wavelength of 160 km (100 mile).
cheers
There aren't any commutators in EV motors (not the ones from major manufacturers, anyway), and I suspect the switching frequencies are way higher than 2kHz, because the motor drives use PWM techniques to synthesize arbitrary voltages.
@@levenkay4468 variable frequency (VFD) - it's the same concept that appliance mfgs have been using for ages and labeling as 'inverter' technology... controlling the speed of a multi-phase motor using variable frequency AC.
@@yogibarista2818 Isn't it important to control the voltage as well? Matching the torque to the load and all that?
I wish I understood this conversation lol seems easy to calculate when you know where to plug the numbers. Anyone care to explain? Just curious to know the long term exposure, potential side effects.
Even a BMW 5 series of 2005 has a lot of electro magnetic radiation, it doesn´t matter if you have a BEV or not every modern car with a lot of electronic gadgets has a lot of electro magnetic radiation.
Fair point
Great video Nikki. Nicely put, clear, simple, friendly and informative. Thanks!
it's also worth mentioning inverse square law. The same reason why a mobile phone torch doesn't illuminate things couple feet away as much as it does an inch away. All energy, magnetic, electromagnetic - etc - works the same way. In other words, you'd have to sit on a very very very powerful motor all the time to have a slightest hint of an issue - if, even - and in an electric car you're always a foot or so away from such sources - and usually behind couple sheets of metal. So a faraday cage applies here too.
It's also worth noting that "regular" cars transfer large amounts of energy from the alternator to the battery and around to lights, sound system, etc.
Can just wrap the dashboard with aluminum
Ok. So, this is the latest FUD against EVs. Thanks Nikki for being ahead of 'em this times. I am sure we will be bombarded with this kind of questions in the coming days along with the usual ones.
Is it "FUD" if it comes directly from an EV manufacturer? The LEAF manual suggests that implanted medical devices in the vacinity of a charging LEAF could result in "injury or death". At least this warning was in the manuals for our 2012 and 2015 LEAF.
@@BixbyConsequence According naive blind morons..it is.
car-recalls.eu/ev-hybrid-recalls-problems-44-20/
Thank you for this explanation. Vert helpful.
Very good you set this question straight!
Beautifully eloquent and clear. Thank you
Nikki, enjoy your show
I was a radiation safety officer
You did a great job explaining the situation
FYI
I helped Zac write a series about the boring company tunnels you may enjoy at Now You Know
I was listening to a teacher from McGill, teaching about radiowaves and said that there is NO long term studies about the effects and there were certainly some, some people would be sensitive to wi-fi and most extreme cases, cellular tower, having disiness, headache. He also mentioned that for EV cars, there is a warning if you do have a pacemaker or other devices. some people also complained that knee replacement was super hot after their ride in their electric car. there is definitely something here but for most of the population, there are no worries to have.
Nicely presented. Keep up the good work.
Good one, I was never worried, but it is great to have on the record.
THANKS YOU !! Great info here !! ;)
Nice job, thanks.
Electric motors use rotating magnet fields and not radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation to create a torque on a rotating shaft. The torque comes from interactions between 2 magnetic fields. Magnetic fields are generated by electrons flowing such as a current in a wire configured in a coil to concentrate the magnetic field flux density. Electromagnetic radiation is not the same phenomenon as magnetic fields although they are related in that electromagnetic radiation such as RF for TV requires magnetic and electric fields to sustain the radiation (transmission). Magnetic fields in electric motors use lower frequencies than RF for TV. Another way of looking at this is that magnetic fields in electric motors exploit near-field effects whereas radio transmitters exploit far-field effects.
It is true to say that electrical equipment in general produces undesirable RF electromagnetic radiation due to electrons moving (kHz to GHz) and manufacturers try to minimise this RF to pass EMI (electromagnetic interference) testing. Therefore, use of an electric motor with its power electronics can generate RF as an unwanted side-effect.
Like the improved video production, Nikki! Cheers!
Nice Josh Clark reference at the end. :D
Thank you, nicely explained, yes people get more radiations from having they smart phones stuck to they hears
And let's not forget that a lot of the food imported that wee eat is radiated with gamma rays .
How does a petrol car compare to ev car with radiation?
Good topic!
Yeah, it’s all about frequency or wavelength of the “radiation.” The frequency of the PWM (pulse-width modulation) from the inverters that form the monster sinewaves that drive EV motors can go as high as a few tens of kilohertz - 10^5 Hz at the most.
However, even then, we have to remember that that’s only the “fundamental” frequency, and the inverter will produce some reasonably-powerful harmonics.
Still, the lowest frequency of ionizing radiation - radiation that can affect chemical bonds, which is UVA - is at nearly 10^15 Hz, more than a billion times that frequency!
The amount of radiation an inverter will put out on its billionth harmonic ... well, let’s just say “it brings new meaning to the word ‘negligible’”!
Even then, you have the inverse-square law, wherein the intensity of EM radiation falls off with square of the distance from the source: so, increase your distance from the inverter and motor by a little over three times, and the intensity of the radiation goes down by a factor of ten, ten times the distance and it goes down by 100, etc. So it’s not nearly powerful enough, sitting in the car seats, to induce currents in electronics. If it could, then the car’s own computers and other electronics would fail.
I wonder if EVs are more likely to explode on impact than gas-powered cars. I’ve read of several EVs in crashes where the occupants burned to death. UA-cam clips testing durability of individual electric fuel cells showed them to be very stable when knocked about, but very explosive when penetrated.
I love your technical prowess. Nice job.
Except for confusing magnetic fields with electromagnetic radiation
A colleague at work recently came at me with this electromagnetic radiation nonsense. I reminded him that as train drivers we sit a few feet away from an alternator the size of a small car and sit directly over huge traction motors which require 25000 volts at up to 7000 amps to operate. "Not the same thing," he replied.
Proven when humans exposed to close proximity electro magnetic radiation its detrimental. Especially from powerful magnetic motors.
Index Proven by whom?
I would be more worried about the cell phone transmitters that you hold right next to your brain. Since field strength reduces by the square of the distance, I like to use speaker mode since even being several inches away is significantly better than touching your head.
For EV's I think all the metal chassis between you and the motors/batteries would provide significant shielding. Im glad to see that a study was done just to make sure.
Cell phone transmitters operate at frequencies about 1 million times lower than the frequencies at which damage to human health can occur.
A fluorescent light fitting in your house is more dangerous than a cell phone tower
The first 5:11 of this video was very useful.
I hope Nissan sees this because the LEAF owners' manual warns of injury or death should a person with an implanted device be in the car while it is charging.
I'm sitting here in London, UK, being bathed by 0.1uS/h of ionising radiation and have been for several years and it hasn't killed me yet. Radiation is over-rated. :-)
Could you also look in to use of resources in constructing EV's vs. ICE vehicles. I've heard comments relating to the use of copper and rare earth metals. I recently purchased a Niro EV, so often get in to conversations where these questions come up. Would like to have information yo share. Thank you for your thorough reporting.
Any links to studies mentioned?
magnetic fields and rf emissions aren't the same thing. Non-ionizing RF emissions can be quite dangerous....don't spend time in a microwave oven. The conclusions were correct however.
Was about to mention this too Dan...
But the food we eat can spend time in the microwave? Even worse, threw mine out a month ago.
LOL WTF who throws out their microwave
@@RetaliationOG people who care about their health lol...do you have plants in the house? if not buy 2 cheap plants, from the same species and same store, same size etc...microwave water, let it cool down to room temperature and water one plant...use NON microwaved room temperature water for the other plant...the microwaved water kills the plant in a few days while the other continues growing...so imagine what microwaving your food all the time does to you?
I purchased a 2015 Leaf and they warned that a person with an implant - my wife has an ICD should not be in the care while it is plugged in to charge. Is this accurate? I love your show! And hope to own a newer model EV in the future.
Jim Kledis I'm pretty sure Tesla Kim has implants and she seems quite healthy!
Nikki, I notice that when you told us about the results of all the measurements on all those cars in Sweden, you did not say how they compared in terms of which ones put out more EMF's then the other. I assume ICE cars were orders of magnitude lower then electric cars in these tests. I know that is the case for my neighbours hybrid Toyota Prius vs my Toyota Echo. The Prius's EMF readings are off the chart that the VW is on. I am pro electric car but this is an issue. we need better grounding for electric cars somehow
OK, but what about inductive charging, some manufactures plan to integrate?
I've got a question: When does the video on the FullyCharged event come out?
Hi Karl,
We're working on the first of several videos at the moment - but as you know, we're a small studio so there's only one or two people to work on things! Right now, Erin is working on some new stuff for patreon, and I'm doing most of the editing!
Nikki.
One comment about your choice of graphics at 2:20 in the video. You are talking about ionizing radiation, including x-rays, while the graphic insert appears to be showing a series of MRI images. Clinical MRI operates at a frequency of about 60 MHz, well below what is considered ionizing radiation. Just thought I would clarify that.
I have a question for you to ask your viewers a question if dear of yours and you were traveling by air to a destination somewhere would you consider traveling by a Airship or a dirigible if it was solar powered and not saluting more in the air even though the Airship is slower than a jet?
Personally, yes I would. The essence of the question echoes one current hurdle to public adoption of EVs, i.e. are you prepared to sacrifice 'fast' journey times for the sake of cleaner, more efficient vehicles?
3.6 Roentgen - not great, not terrible.
I've been wanting to know the answer to that question. Thanks
I'm sorry to hear about your sister.
But it's probably a good idea not to mention that your late sister "rode in the car plenty". Some people read this and 2+2=5
By yourself, EMF meter and do your own study like. I did find out they were a little bit high.
Don’t worry it’s safe and effective.
Like the vacation 🤣🤣🤣🤣
very important topic can you attach the research that you mentioned on the video that was conducted in Norway?
No need, these are completely off topic and irrelevant, like the whole video. The problem has nothing to do with ionization whatsoever.
@@FlorestanTrementso what is relevant?
@@ruslan4real Ain't that obvious? People's sickness is relevant! It's not the radiation they need to study, it's the people!
They are "proving" that the people are not sick by studying the radiation. It makes no sense!
@@FlorestanTrement Right on target! "Ain't that obvious?"
I swear it is not, for the 99% of misled citizens, believing the bro-science studies from the national/global institutions (WHO, FDA, FTC, FCC, NIH, ICNIRP, you name it), based on the assumption that the only harm EMF/EMR could do to us, is heat, therefore they only look for heat effects, find nothing, then conclude it's harmless, & everyone happily believes them.
The DAS standard has been built on that same idea, the "biological" tests were applied to a plastic dummy, for 15min, supervised by engineers, aka not biologists. Is it enough for you? That's what we call pseudo-science, or a SCAM.
All these organizations have conflicts of interests with telecom companies, lobbies, & some of those planning the 5G + IA + Transhumanism agenda today (neuralink, blablah; but nothing new, it's been long time we have evidences).
Another filthy point, why do insurance companies specifically discard any responsibility for EMF poisoning? (same story for vax btw) Nah, nothing wrong, like a guy going to your home to repair something, asking you to sign a certification for declining any suing in case of totally unrelated & accidental theft, death, & burning of the house. Ya knaw 😇
Some sources for further gathering:
www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal ua-cam.com/video/Xhtgobb7MIE/v-deo.html : 5G Apocalypse
ua-cam.com/video/ovCmevjCA04/v-deo.html : EMF Radiation, 5G, Cell Phones, Microwaves - EMF Minimalist - Perfected Health Podcast #6
ua-cam.com/video/h4TdY344Now/v-deo.html : 5G Wireless Safety - Former President Of Microsoft Canada Frank Clegg & 5G 4G 3G Technologies
ua-cam.com/video/hXLuZEPbQgw/v-deo.html : "You Won't Believe How EMFs Affect Your Body!" , iHealthTube.com
ua-cam.com/video/BwyDCHf5iCY/v-deo.html : "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" , Dr Devra Davis
ua-cam.com/video/xXsrwBRygYU/v-deo.html : Barry Trower, physicien expert, dénonce les micro ondes et le Wi-Fi ; Chris Montclar
ua-cam.com/video/nXqHQ6J8YM4/v-deo.html : Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech
ua-cam.com/video/-D176962AdU/v-deo.html : [interview] Impact des ondes sur le fœtus - Barry Trower
ua-cam.com/video/eMlXO4VqR8Q/v-deo.html : Senator Speaks Freely on 5G HARM
ua-cam.com/video/p3En4dbEvqA/v-deo.html : Danger de la 5G : cri d'alarme (The Fullertone Informer = John Briana)
ua-cam.com/video/OBgtnGREn-s/v-deo.html : 50.000 satellites 5G, pour quoi faire ? Entretien avec Jean-Marie LOPEZ, astronome
ua-cam.com/video/XvYwBGUevPw/v-deo.html : The 60 Gigahertz And WiGiG Reality #JOEIMBRIANO ; The Fullertone Informer
ua-cam.com/channels/aLwcpzmAp9cYPmMdKmhb9g.html : EMF Safety Zone
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029112
www.babysafeproject.org : Yale University Medical Non-Profit ; www.emfhelpcenter.com
www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions (Over 1800 Studies - EMF's cause DNA Damage, even Mitochondrial DNA! ) ; www.emfscientist.com : 253 EMF scientists from 44 nations have signed the Appeal
showthefineprint.org/see-the-fine-print (Health Liability WARNINGS from Wireless Manufactures)
www.scribd.com/lists/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies : Over 960 Studies which Demonstrate EMF's Cause HARM
www.emfresearch.com/emfs-male-fertility : 135 PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES & REPORTS SHOWING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF EMF EXPOSURES ON MALE FERTILITY (1972-2012).
web.archive.org/web/20190118210026/www.justproveit.net/studies : Compilation of 1,000's of Studies on the HARMFUL effects of EMF's. (Wayback Machine Strikes again!) ...
kompetenzinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Hensinger_Wilke_2016_umg_Engl.pdf : Wireless communication technologies: New study findings confirm risks of non-ionizing radiation
www.emf-portal.org/en emfsafetynetwork.org ; www.emfanalysis.com
www.retrouversonnord.be/Pollutions_Electromagnetiques.htm ; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206838 ; www.electricsense.com ; www.saferemr.com
www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/electromagnetic-radiation + www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/electromagnetic-radiation ; centerforsaferwireless.us/web/main
www.demain-conseils.com/systeme-immunitaire-affaibli-ondes ; www.hippocrates-electrosmog-appeal.be/international ; ehtrust.org ; c4st.org ; phiremedical.org
www.researchgate.net/publication/44685415_Mobile_Phone_Mast_Effects_on_Common_Frog_Rana_temporaria_Tadpoles_The_City_Turned_into_a_Laboratory
www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/high-exposure-radio-frequency-radiation-associated-cancer-male-rats = ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/cellphones/index.cfm : Cancer Tumors on rats from EMF
www.emfdata.org/en/studies/detail?id=509 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834628 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 www.researchgate.net/publication/309358226_The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5746641/Experts-warn-radiation-WiFi-power-lines-poses-credible-threat-Earths-species.html
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46047/1/MPRA_paper_46047.pdf ; mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects www.academia.edu/36283244/The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.economist.com/comment/2937377 ; www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext ;
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719337805 ; inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44058782
@@bobcoco6047 Two details, though: Neuralink might help transhumanists but it is not a transhumanist project.
The goal on Tranhumanists is to abolish death. The goal of Neuralink is to merge people with AI (i.e. control AI the way the "reptilian brain" controls the cortex) to save us from ending as AIs pets. Musk said publicly several times he wanted to die on Mars.
Another thing, 5G is short range and does not make any sense on a satellite. I believe their signals are also targeted at the receivers to both save energy and enable higher bandwidth.
On top of that Lopez is just a senseless angry man. Starlink satellites are brightest just after launch. Although they missed this, initially, SpaceX updated their satellites to make them as stealthy as possible and their latest version is about as good as invisible, once they reach their orbit. There are around 900 (with a launch every few weeks) of them in the sky now, I believe but I don't hear about any new complaint.
its like the warnings for switching off your mobile phone at fossil fuel stations.....all just paranoia.....besides what about diesel particulates, benzene and exhaust fumes ? whats your preferred risk ?
I believe that’s more about the possible risk of a static shock setting off fumes than the phone radiation.
thankgoodness then there are no high voltages present in a petrol engine like coil packs or spark plugs ...lol....
my old clio would give me a huge static belt when got out of her in dry weather.....nasty car......never experienced static off a mobile though.....
If I remember correctly, the phone doesn't give you a shock but builds up a charge in your body. That charge could travel through the nozzle when it touches the car. Since gasoline vehicles work by igniting fumes with a spark, I'm sure you can see why that is an issue.
@@leax_Flame
Mobiles don't magically give you a static charge. That's not how static electricity works. And if static electricity were any issue at fuel stations, we would have had explosions for decades. People get zapped all the time when exiting their cars, with or without phone.
Let's not forget the people who have left with the ice cars in closed room and you know what happened to them.
This prove more that electric cars are the safe
The only _'danger'_ posed by the proposed general adoption of electric vehicles is that the _de facto_ standard of a modern world powered solely by fossil fuels may be dispelled, erasing forever the concept of _'Black Gold',_ Petroleum, being a path to financial stability or economic control worldwide. After all, economists were assured for the better part of the past 45 years by experts out of Detroit, Frankfurt, and Tokyo that EV technology _'just wasn't quite there yet',_ probably would not reach viability for 50 to 100 years, and in all likelihood was impossible to achieve. The existence of Tesla also challenges accepted, common ideas that insist advertising is a necessary expense, that _'Independent Franchised Dealerships'_ are the sole viable means of Distribution and Sales of New automobiles, that labor unions such as the Teamsters and UAW are mandatory millstones for corporate manufacturers to bear, or that ICE powered by fossil fuels is the only safe, affordable, reliable means of transportation in the world. Thus, is it any way wonder that for over a decade there has been a constant, concentrated, focused campaign to portray EVs as inferior, unsafe, expensive, and incapable compared to their ICE driven forbears by newsmedia companies in print, radio, and television that are largely supported by funding from advertising paid for by petroleum companies, and traditional conventional legacy ICE automobile manufacturers and their dealership networks? Don't be a pawn of Petroleum companies. Decide for yourself, based on the evidence available. Sure, it is often argued that EVs simply _'cost too much'._ Perhaps. Notice how in 1990, the average sale price for a new vehicle sold in th U.S. was $15,000. Today that amount is $38,000. Yes, for several years, the Nissan VERSA was the best selling, cheap, ICE based car in the U.S. at around $12,000 MSRP and it was greatly outsold year after year by the BMW 3-Series, which sold for at least $34,000. Today, both are outsold by the Tesla Model 3, in the U.S. Combined. Collectively. In Consecutive years going back to 2018. Being based upon ICE does not automatically guarantee low price or high sales. Those who suggest otherwise are entirely ignoring the facts and evidence to the contrary.
Similarly, the Tesla Model S has outsold many of its direct competitors among large, luxury, flagship Sedans since 2013. Again, its market dominance has been largely combined, collective, and consistently consecutive, despite repeated claims that Model S sales were being cannibalized by Model 3 sales in recent years. Oh, and the direct ICE competitors to Model S, in top trim, all cost more than the top-of-the-line Model S in its top Performance trim. So no salvation for ICE in that realm either. Even newcomers, praised for their size, power, handling, styling, and price point, among entry level luxury cars, such as the GENESIS G70, KIA STINGER, and Alfa Romeo Giulia, all ICE powered, failed to impress buyers in large numbers, despite their strict adherence to the precepts of tradition, convention, ritual, and legacy. Even with their use of _'Independent Franchised Dealerships',_ and advertising campaigns that were rather widespread, none of them came close to the sales of the Model 3. The term _'Diminishing Returns'_ comes to mind, along with _'Throwing Good Money After Bad'._ Even a rousing endorsement by Emerson Fittipaldi failed to garner results for KIA's entry. Each of them was simply _'Too Little, Too Late',_ a fate I believe, will befall the Ford Mach-E and Ford F-150 Lightning as well, though I actually like each of those.
FUD -- Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt, have been fundamental in spreading potential, and inaccurate, propaganda against EVs. Concentration on the multitude of supposed 'problems' that presumably have not and cannot be addressed by EV Proponents, such as myself. For decades, I heard them say, "Until EVs have a 200 mile range, minimum, they'll NEVER be a viable source of transportation for the average person." Yet, when 200+ mile range appeared, nine years ago, suddenly the argument became '400 mile range, minimum' despite the fact that numerous performance oriented modern ICE vehicles, sometimes costing multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars, were incapable of a 300 mile range, even using gasoline. The excuse offered for that was that such performance cars 'were not meant to be grand tourers' and that 'most people rarely drive in excess of 40 miles per day, anyway'. So, assuming that's the case, why the minimum necessity for five days' worth of range? I used to think that was because, roughly 45 years or so ago, most cars were essentially gas guzzlers. So, a car with a 19 gallon fuel tank that got perhaps 12 miles per gallon had a maximum range of maybe 228 miles on a good day. Back then, there were no 'low fuel' idiot lights on the dashboard of American gas guzzling behemoths, so when the shadow of the bouncing needle of the fuel indicator/guess-o-meter glanced against 'E' on the fuel gauge, that was it, you had a walk ahead of you to get more fuel, because the car stopped, cold. There were no cell phones either, so no easy way to contact roadside assistance was available. You might be lucky enough to be nearby an operational roadside Call Box, but that could be expensive. Not that stopping at any of the Last Chance GAS! stations that used to dot the open highway in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas were particularly inexpensive, as they charged ridiculously expensive amounts per gallon, mercenary rates, just to fill up, for a ride, or tow. If your car only got 5-to-8 MPG, it was even worse, as your effective range was diminished even with a 25 gallon tank. Because of this, people routinely stopped to fill up at anything below 1/4 or 1/2 tank remaining, and really had no idea of the actual range of their cars. People who remember those days typically misjudge their needed range requirements for daily driving and mistakenly run out of gas all the time today, thinking, _"I just put five bucks in it",_ forgetting entirely that it has been a LONG time since Regular gasoline cost less than $0.75 per gallon. Dude, your circa 1978 El Camino is a gas guzzler, five bucks barely buys two gallons now, you were lucky to make it home. Of course you ran out of gas. Learn to count. Numbers won't kill you. I once had a Girlfriend, eight years older than I was, who was in the habit of similarly thinking _'five bucks'_ was a substantial amount of fuel. It was extremely difficult to convince her to read the amount of gallons she added at the pump instead of the total price she paid as a metric.
They might be safe (debatable, ‘cos they do seem to burst into flames, run out of charge in the overtaking lane of motorways and cause serious range-anxiety issues), but
A friend has an electric Peugeot suv.
£37,000. New.
Av. range on full charge 150 m
Petrol station charger (paid) 50miles for one hour. Can easily be 3 or 4 cars in charger queue.
Supermarket charger (free) 10 miles for 30 minutes.
My car. Nissan Qashqai.
Full tank around £80 ($93)
Range approx. 500 miles.
No wait at gas station.
No mid trip charging.
It’s a no brainer.
What are the official limits of the electro magnetic radiation of the battery?
There are constantly redesigned motors with different ideas on the coils especially. But you did mention the emf spike right above the battery, which is beneath the occupants. But 4-1/2 minutes in and ZERO comments on the electronics. The inverter, charging, the bloody IOT garbage and so on. The manufacturers are each working on their own platforms. You treat them all alike. Scientific method seems usual modern peer review sort. What has me especially curious is the cheap emf tester.
HM EM of electric car!?
As far as I remember, there plenty of electric motors in ICE cars. Beside that, fuel combustion requires electric arcing to combust (except DIESEL). For arcing you need at least 20.000 volt or higher voltage. That makes a lot of emmission to.
Is it safe when EMT shows up?
Official limits. When were those limits done? 30 years back, before any electric vehicle could be thought. Studies and limits should be taken in context.
Do we even have enough data before parroting talking points provided by supporters or EV.
As a biomedical science graduate with an A-level in physics it blows my mind that people actually worry about this kind of thing.
People worry because of the unknown. Science thinks it can provide the answers -- and we look to it for that -- but Science only knows what lies within the limits of its knowledge. I assume you became a scientist because you wanted to understand things that have yet to be discovered and explained? This is great! But please understand that people are different: not only in how their minds react (for reassurance) but also in how their bodies react -- for instance, to electromagnetic radiation: some of us burn in the sun more than others.
@@michaelcarter2169 yeah but science also explains how ultraviolet radiation causes those sun burns due to its high energy and ability to knock electrons off atoms. There is no ionizing radiation being produced by an alternating current in a coil pushing magnets to propel an electric car. Nor do the LTE networks run on ionizing radiation. It's blindingly obvious that internal combustion engine car pollution is harmful though, and yet we understand it and are used to it so we seem to not care as much.
Thank you for clearing up fud🌏🌈😃#buzzofftoxic
This is another bought and paid for video. All forms of EMF, even the range and frequency coming from an alarm clock can be hazardous. And now the corporations are telling us yet again that with their new cars that literally run off electricity that they're not gonna harm you somehow.
How about smart watches?
I guess people just ignore the fact that oil n coal are radio active for the sake of alleged convenience then.
good job Nikki?
Many of the people who will fret and wring their hands imagining harmful effects from some presumed emanation from EV battery packs will walk around holding a live microwave transmitter to their ear without a qualm.
2022 - After Hurricane Ian electric cars are EXPLODING in Florida. Lots of them.
this is only a test on 1 car it doesnt take into account any other devices inside the car such as mobile phone or other cars in the visintiy eg stuck in jam on motorway or cell towers or any other rf emitting devices in range i would think there is an amount tollerable to humans as we all know but how much absorbtion in a day can you really tolerate,only time will tell i guess thx for the vid
My Updated BEV v. ICE cost comparison spreadsheet
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kIYlSspVmNZvfDgBEaU68thJ2uY4P0EyHp0ygX0qp2Q
Shows absolutely zero evidence, just shows stock footage...
What a BS video! They are only considering what is dangerous to be what can be observed or measured within a very short time frame during and after exposure. They are not considering the sub-clinical damage that is being done that will not be obviously observable or measurable for perhaps years. That is like having a person chew tobacco to see if any significant damage is being done to the body by one session of chewing it and than declaring it safe. A perfect example of this is how when cigarette smoking was declared to be bad for your health and could cause cancer by the Surgeon General this was entirely from observation of linkage, not from scientific study, which shows you clearly scientific studies are generally poorly constructed due to departmentalization and myopic thinking and leaving out many vital factors. If you are not an authority in biophysics, than you have no business declaring any type of radiation emitting technology safe to people or biology period!
Absolutely. The deception is so deep, almost all of those are just trusting the authorities & "making their job", legally protecting their business, while the denial of true science on the subject keeps strong, either discarded by uneducated ppl (99% unfortunately), or by educated con artists with white blouse.
I'm not sure blaming them is the right path though, the information is really hard to find, when all the major corps (WHO, FDA, FTC, FCC, NIH, ICNIRP, you name it) mislead you. I'm not sure what to do exactly, aside from informing ppl as time allows.
Cheers
Does this mean I don’t need to wear my lead jock-strap?
So where are the studies that
Conclude it's completely safe and has no detriment to health whatsoever? Saying that emissions are below official levels is just another way of saying it will kill you slowly enough combined with all the other soft kill for no-one to notice.
'trust the authorities' they said.............jabz
Ok hello .should goverments have all new cars go though a emp test done to know what all cars will do in a complete power loss .i have learned many evs lock in gear park when completely dead battery
So where would the EV sit in the chart at 2:39 ?
Somewhere from "LF"-TVs and monitors to the left of that. OR simply put, Basicaly harmless.
@@leax_Flame So (even) safer than the 4g on the dash (or in the dash)
If anyone says to me "But the radiation is frying my brain" I point out that they are using a computer that emits all sort of frequencies and they need to go back to printed paper. 8-)
and nowhere near EMF tester has been found in the video. why? because real since no need it !
i am more concerned by the high frequency radiation from the nav . telemetry etc, on modern cars, horrible gratuitous tech, this of course can be on ICE cars just as much as EVs. I have an RF meter that reads almost nothing in my Nissan EV (once i turn bluetooth off on the stereo that is) but very high on my PSA EV. I want to find out how to turn off the telemetry. so far the main dealer has not been helpful in any way.
Answer is you don't know .. just like a cell phone we don't know long term
The ignition coils in gasoline vehicles operate at a much higher voltage than EVs. People should probably stop driving them, just to be on the safe side.
Probably but go watch some other vids there is differently some dangerous radiation produced by some tesla , so just saying take care out there however 5g will zap us all with much higher levels and render your child infertile so I see a civil war on a global scale occurring soon .
There is probably more danger from all the radars we are bombarded with from all the newer cars..those are microwaves
there seem to be factors not considered......................... me thinks
Such as...?
^Kate
What happens when we have millions of EVs on the road .
Could there be a risk to pedestrians due to long term exposure of electro magnetic radiation
someone asked me to solve a problem how to keep radiation from you while in a ufo sence it causes the dna to misprint or degrade i said rock they said to heavy they tried that yrs later when the iss took icecream up and took 2 days for delivery and showed the video it was not melted from radiation after i gave an idea about black carbon and sulfates blocking radiation to a few people i did not figue to weeks later that black carbon is brittle in cold and does not hold up well as an exterior of a spaceship do to the atmosphere in reentry just stripping it away but if you put a naolayor like paint of fosphurus and then put carbon over that in side of ship on walls well astros would be protected from space because water layor is to heavy if entering atmosphere with gravity or if you get a hole from micromeater you would lose the water layer so water wouldnt work and you could build a ship with memory metals and powdered carbon fiber inbeded 3 d printed in space it would be stronger and you could manipulate the structure this way and add even organic structures so a ship could morph with diffrent frequencies
I'd be inclined to give your post more credence if you'd learn to spell and use a few full stops and commas in the appropriate places
Hope you can put my mind at ease because after watching this i started thinking .
All the test results are from single vehicle outputs , will the results differ when electric vehicles become the dominant mode of transport .
Remember it took a little over one hundred years to realise that burning fossil fuel is hazardous to health , and its not going without a fight .
In the not so distant future electric vehicles will be the norm with several million vehicles being sold world wide each year .
Imagine years from now , cities that suffer grid lock will there be a spike in radiation levels due to all the electric vehicles
Could it be that one hundred years from now we find that maybe electric vehicles are a hazard to health also .
Really hope am wrong but as modern electric vehicles are a relatively new form of propulsion , the long term effects remain to be seen.
I agree Alan. It's very true that we have no long term studies to prove anything right now. We simply do not know enough to make safety claims. Throughout history people were quick to claim safety but ended completely wrong. We need to take everything with a grain of salt. I don't know about other people but whenever I sit in an electric car or any type of car matter of fact, I feel dizzy, nauseous and lose strength. It's as if I can physically feel the electromagnetic frequencies. Maybe it's just me or I am just super sensitive. But one thing I know is that my body does not lie. I guess only time will tell to reveal the truth.
I don't think you are a physicist or engineer, so you are to be forgiven. Here's a case of something that sounds like what it is, is NOT. Electromagnetic radiation is changing magnetic and Electric field. It is not the result of the field caused by an electromagnet. An electromagnet produces a magnetic field (same as a bar magnet) unless it is produced by an alternating current, in which case it produces a MAGNETIC field which changes strength and direction. So strangely, an electromagnet only produces a magnetic filed, not a field of electromagnetic radiation.
Any thoughts on a gold? Going up!
Sorry I must disagree. New research shows non ionizing rays can have a bad effect on our bodies over time. It just has a slower effect.
True. Consider here: the car acting like a mini farraday cage, it actually gives measurements higher than from simple ² decrease with distance rule; then consider the electronic in the car (Wi-Fi screen...), & lastly, the ICNIRP limit is + than 600 times higher than the levels PROVEN to affect human/animal biology (including DNA).
Some sources for further gathering:
www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal ua-cam.com/video/Xhtgobb7MIE/v-deo.html : 5G Apocalypse
ua-cam.com/video/ovCmevjCA04/v-deo.html : EMF Radiation, 5G, Cell Phones, Microwaves - EMF Minimalist - Perfected Health Podcast #6
ua-cam.com/video/h4TdY344Now/v-deo.html : 5G Wireless Safety - Former President Of Microsoft Canada Frank Clegg & 5G 4G 3G Technologies
ua-cam.com/video/hXLuZEPbQgw/v-deo.html : "You Won't Believe How EMFs Affect Your Body!" , iHealthTube.com
ua-cam.com/video/BwyDCHf5iCY/v-deo.html : "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" , Dr Devra Davis
ua-cam.com/video/xXsrwBRygYU/v-deo.html : Barry Trower, physicien expert, dénonce les micro ondes et le Wi-Fi ; Chris Montclar
ua-cam.com/video/nXqHQ6J8YM4/v-deo.html : Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech
ua-cam.com/video/-D176962AdU/v-deo.html : [interview] Impact des ondes sur le fœtus - Barry Trower
ua-cam.com/video/eMlXO4VqR8Q/v-deo.html : Senator Speaks Freely on 5G HARM
ua-cam.com/video/p3En4dbEvqA/v-deo.html : Danger de la 5G : cri d'alarme (The Fullertone Informer = John Briana)
ua-cam.com/video/OBgtnGREn-s/v-deo.html : 50.000 satellites 5G, pour quoi faire ? Entretien avec Jean-Marie LOPEZ, astronome
ua-cam.com/video/XvYwBGUevPw/v-deo.html : The 60 Gigahertz And WiGiG Reality #JOEIMBRIANO ; The Fullertone Informer
ua-cam.com/channels/aLwcpzmAp9cYPmMdKmhb9g.html : EMF Safety Zone
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029112
www.babysafeproject.org : Yale University Medical Non-Profit ; www.emfhelpcenter.com
www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions (Over 1800 Studies - EMF's cause DNA Damage, even Mitochondrial DNA! ) ; www.emfscientist.com : 253 EMF scientists from 44 nations have signed the Appeal
showthefineprint.org/see-the-fine-print (Health Liability WARNINGS from Wireless Manufactures)
www.scribd.com/lists/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies : Over 960 Studies which Demonstrate EMF's Cause HARM
www.emfresearch.com/emfs-male-fertility : 135 PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES & REPORTS SHOWING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF EMF EXPOSURES ON MALE FERTILITY (1972-2012).
web.archive.org/web/20190118210026/www.justproveit.net/studies : Compilation of 1,000's of Studies on the HARMFUL effects of EMF's. (Wayback Machine Strikes again!) ...
kompetenzinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Hensinger_Wilke_2016_umg_Engl.pdf : Wireless communication technologies: New study findings confirm risks of non-ionizing radiation
www.emf-portal.org/en emfsafetynetwork.org ; www.emfanalysis.com
www.retrouversonnord.be/Pollutions_Electromagnetiques.htm ; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206838 ; www.electricsense.com ; www.saferemr.com
www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/electromagnetic-radiation + www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/electromagnetic-radiation ; centerforsaferwireless.us/web/main
www.demain-conseils.com/systeme-immunitaire-affaibli-ondes ; www.hippocrates-electrosmog-appeal.be/international ; ehtrust.org ; c4st.org ; phiremedical.org
www.researchgate.net/publication/44685415_Mobile_Phone_Mast_Effects_on_Common_Frog_Rana_temporaria_Tadpoles_The_City_Turned_into_a_Laboratory
www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/high-exposure-radio-frequency-radiation-associated-cancer-male-rats = ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/cellphones/index.cfm : Cancer Tumors on rats from EMF
www.emfdata.org/en/studies/detail?id=509 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834628 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 www.researchgate.net/publication/309358226_The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5746641/Experts-warn-radiation-WiFi-power-lines-poses-credible-threat-Earths-species.html
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46047/1/MPRA_paper_46047.pdf ; mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects www.academia.edu/36283244/The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.economist.com/comment/2937377 ; www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext ;
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719337805 ; inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44058782
That is still putting away all the other scams on other fields, making the context so much + suspicious, it becomes obvious who you're dealing with... Not incompetence, negligence, inertia of research or lazy unawareness. They know very well.
Electromagnetic radiation has always been dangerous, there are no safe levels.
There seem to be safe levels for biology/DNA , yet they are like 1000× higher than the ICNIRP limit, & obviously there is a major scam on this field (well, is there any clean one at this point?).
Some sources for further gathering (may use translations for french content):
www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal ua-cam.com/video/Xhtgobb7MIE/v-deo.html : 5G Apocalypse
ua-cam.com/video/ovCmevjCA04/v-deo.html : EMF Radiation, 5G, Cell Phones, Microwaves - EMF Minimalist - Perfected Health Podcast #6
ua-cam.com/video/h4TdY344Now/v-deo.html : 5G Wireless Safety - Former President Of Microsoft Canada Frank Clegg & 5G 4G 3G Technologies
ua-cam.com/video/hXLuZEPbQgw/v-deo.html : "You Won't Believe How EMFs Affect Your Body!" , iHealthTube.com
ua-cam.com/video/BwyDCHf5iCY/v-deo.html : "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" , Dr Devra Davis
ua-cam.com/video/xXsrwBRygYU/v-deo.html : Barry Trower, physicien expert, dénonce les micro ondes et le Wi-Fi ; Chris Montclar
ua-cam.com/video/nXqHQ6J8YM4/v-deo.html : Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech
ua-cam.com/video/-D176962AdU/v-deo.html : [interview] Impact des ondes sur le fœtus - Barry Trower
ua-cam.com/video/eMlXO4VqR8Q/v-deo.html : Senator Speaks Freely on 5G HARM
ua-cam.com/video/p3En4dbEvqA/v-deo.html : Danger de la 5G : cri d'alarme (The Fullertone Informer = John Briana)
ua-cam.com/video/OBgtnGREn-s/v-deo.html : 50.000 satellites 5G, pour quoi faire ? Entretien avec Jean-Marie LOPEZ, astronome
ua-cam.com/video/XvYwBGUevPw/v-deo.html : The 60 Gigahertz And WiGiG Reality #JOEIMBRIANO ; The Fullertone Informer
ua-cam.com/channels/aLwcpzmAp9cYPmMdKmhb9g.html : EMF Safety Zone
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029112
www.babysafeproject.org : Yale University Medical Non-Profit ; www.emfhelpcenter.com
www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions (Over 1800 Studies - EMF's cause DNA Damage, even Mitochondrial DNA! ) ; www.emfscientist.com : 253 EMF scientists from 44 nations have signed the Appeal
showthefineprint.org/see-the-fine-print (Health Liability WARNINGS from Wireless Manufactures)
www.scribd.com/lists/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies : Over 960 Studies which Demonstrate EMF's Cause HARM
www.emfresearch.com/emfs-male-fertility : 135 PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES & REPORTS SHOWING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF EMF EXPOSURES ON MALE FERTILITY (1972-2012).
web.archive.org/web/20190118210026/www.justproveit.net/studies : Compilation of 1,000's of Studies on the HARMFUL effects of EMF's. (Wayback Machine Strikes again!) ...
kompetenzinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Hensinger_Wilke_2016_umg_Engl.pdf : Wireless communication technologies: New study findings confirm risks of non-ionizing radiation
www.emf-portal.org/en emfsafetynetwork.org ; www.emfanalysis.com
www.retrouversonnord.be/Pollutions_Electromagnetiques.htm ; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206838 ; www.electricsense.com ; www.saferemr.com
www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/electromagnetic-radiation + www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/electromagnetic-radiation ; centerforsaferwireless.us/web/main
www.demain-conseils.com/systeme-immunitaire-affaibli-ondes ; www.hippocrates-electrosmog-appeal.be/international ; ehtrust.org ; c4st.org ; phiremedical.org
www.researchgate.net/publication/44685415_Mobile_Phone_Mast_Effects_on_Common_Frog_Rana_temporaria_Tadpoles_The_City_Turned_into_a_Laboratory
www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/high-exposure-radio-frequency-radiation-associated-cancer-male-rats = ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/cellphones/index.cfm : Cancer Tumors on rats from EMF
www.emfdata.org/en/studies/detail?id=509 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834628 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 www.researchgate.net/publication/309358226_The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5746641/Experts-warn-radiation-WiFi-power-lines-poses-credible-threat-Earths-species.html
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46047/1/MPRA_paper_46047.pdf ; mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects www.academia.edu/36283244/The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.economist.com/comment/2937377 ; www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext ;
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719337805 ; inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44058782
I was subscribed to your channel till today... goodbye!
Looks like another "Fact Checkers" Video to me...
Just like the vax is safe.
What are the limits??? the USA FCC limits are 1000x higher than there countries.
You are unknowingly completely off topic. At low power, the danger with magnetic and electromagnetic fields have no link with their ionization ability whatsoever. We can live with them no problem. In fact, the Earth natural magnetic field is significant and harmless. But constant.
The thing is, every change in the electromagnetic fields require a small adaptation from living organisms. Very small, but an adaptation nonetheless. As all adaptation, this means stress. Small adaptation, small stress. Every change means an adaptation, making high frequency change more stressful for the body.
For anyone healthy enough, this usually poses little to no problem. A bit like toxic foods, pesticides, air and water pollution, social stress, overworking, lack of sleep, malnutrition (very common in rich countries by lack of micronutrients), and so on and so forth. The problem is, many people accumulate a lot of these small or not so small stresses, and over the years, at some point, the organism cannot cope anymore and start showing symptoms. Over this, as in all things, some people are much more resilient, others much more sensitive than others.
Thankfully, as I understand it, electronics are sensitive to these changes too, and so, they are shielded. Usually, many electronics are between the passengers and the motor, which makes modern cars, even electric ones, less of a problem than older ones. The batteries seem to sometimes be a problem, though. And for the most sensitive, there is still the wifi, bluetooth and other 4G connections.
Among the usual symptoms, you can find headaches, nausea, tiredness, dizziness, confusion and difficulty to concentrate, depression, infertility. Usually not all at once, and some more prominent with certain bandwith, like the compact fuorescent light and to a lesser extent, the electronics in some LED lamps are prone to generate headaches, while wifi is known to cause masculine infertility. Most things the average physician will call of psychological origin after making their patient go through many useless, pricey, time consuming and sometime invasive medical tests.
I used to constantly suffer from most of these in my apartment, for years, believing them to be of psychological origin. And then got to sleep someplace isolated enough from them and got more or less cured overnight. And got sick again the first hour I was back in my home. These threats are real.
Note that ICE cars also deploy strong changing fields through alternators and spark plugs.
Florestan Trément Right at the beginning you make an assertion that every change in the field requires an adaptation. Why? What kind of adaptation? How does the cell detect the change? What’s happening on a physical level? I suspect that at the levels talked about in this video the cells in your body are blissfully unaware that the fields exist, changes or not.
Electromgnetic fields ARE changing magnetic fields (and electric fields) - they reverse polarity on each cycle - it's simply a matter of how quickly they change polarity.
Until they change polarity around 10 raised to the power 17 times per second, they present no significant danger to human health
So called ‘electro sensitivity’ has never been demonstrated in double blinded peer reviewed studies. And the claim that WiFi causes male infertility is simply laughable.
You are spouting so much BS without any sources, that it's not even funny anymore.
Btw. have you told ice skaters and dancers that they should stop doing pirouettes? I mean they are spinning in an magnetic field. That's the same as being static in a changing magnetic field. All those stresses on the living organism!
@@jimmurphy5355 In a way, you are right, I don't know the detail of the adaptations, and this is only part of a theory. As the theory of relativity is just a theory. "My" theory entails cutting edge chemistry, quantum physics and another field, I don't remember which, I suppose related to electromagnetism. And I don't have enough knowledge in these fields to explain it. But as all theories, this one is grounded in two ways. First it roots in the law of hormesis, which implies every aggression that doesn't actually hurt the body is met with an adaptation, and has a threshold past which it fails and has to compensate in a more damaging way. And the second base is the experience of so many people, including mine. Sure many that claim to be electrosensitive are hypochondriac, as it is such an easy way to feel hurt, but this sickness comes with other symptoms, many electrosensitives lack. Especially those that didn't know what they were suffering from until accidentally and momentarily getting cured of their symptoms, like I did. Of course, you can be both electrosensitive and hypochondriac. Unsolved sickness breeds more sickness.
Few people in the scientific world understand how it works, because of the specialist knowledge it requires. The one specialist I know about is Marc Henry, conferences from which videos are available in French. His field of study is water.
One of the effects of these fields are related to the simple, and widely known, fact that H₂O molecules act as magnet, for all intents and purposes. This makes them sensitive magnetic fields. The chemistry of the body also relies heavily on ions, which are charged particles, which are sensitive to electric fields. If the body want them to act in a predictable manner, it has to adapt itself in some way every time their behavior changes. I have no idea how, but it seems reasonable to me.
Electric cars are very dangerous to your health... if you drive them off a vary high cliff. Oddly, the same applies to every other type of car.... and pushbikes!
Nah, it's only 3.6... Nevermind.
Not everyone agrees with this assessment. Keep researching.
MRI scan anyone :0 Fancy that sick people need this insanely powerful Magnetic fields to scan their bodies to help make them well. As for electric cars well, if the magnetic field in the motor wasn't contained within the motor and directed across the insanely small gap between the stator and the rotor the there'd not be enough interaction to make the motor turn and hence move the car!
On further reflection, it's this word Radiation that spooks people I suppose any energy which can move across a gap is in someway radiated and therefore a form of radiation. be it light, heat or even sound. without radiation, we'd all be dead if you think about it!
I think I fell asleep watching this video.
I'm not against EVs. I like them. I'm considering getting one myself, but it's patently obvious this channel is a propaganda channel in favor of EVS. Therefore, I don't take this to be very objective. There's no videos from this channel that shows why EVs are bad for an individual or society in general. NOTHING in the world is all pros. There are always pros and cons for EVERYTHING. There are plenty of CONs with conventional gas/diesel powered vehicles. There are PLENTY of cons with EVs. I hadn't thought about this issue before seeing this video but this video does make me think about it more. It can't be good for one to sit onto of these electric motors for long hours each day, same as it can't be good to hold a cell phone next to your brain and talk on for hours every day.
Lance Guilin LOL! Time for your meds!
Is that a German flag on your shirt? 🤔
5G and 4G is probly more dangerous. 5G the most, even when these are non-ionizing radiation.
If non ionising then how exactly is it dangerous?
@@parajacks4 it makes you almost sterile. it reduces your sperm count if your phone is next to your balls. scientific research / tests already proved this. who knows what else it can do.
@@parajacks4 Consider: the car acting like a mini farraday cage, it actually gives measurements higher than from simple ² decrease with distance rule; then consider the electronic in the car (Wi-Fi screen...), & lastly, the ICNIRP limit is + than 600 times higher than the levels PROVEN to affect human/animal biology (including DNA).
Some sources for further gathering:
www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal ua-cam.com/video/Xhtgobb7MIE/v-deo.html : 5G Apocalypse
ua-cam.com/video/ovCmevjCA04/v-deo.html : EMF Radiation, 5G, Cell Phones, Microwaves - EMF Minimalist - Perfected Health Podcast #6
ua-cam.com/video/h4TdY344Now/v-deo.html : 5G Wireless Safety - Former President Of Microsoft Canada Frank Clegg & 5G 4G 3G Technologies
ua-cam.com/video/hXLuZEPbQgw/v-deo.html : "You Won't Believe How EMFs Affect Your Body!" , iHealthTube.com
ua-cam.com/video/BwyDCHf5iCY/v-deo.html : "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" , Dr Devra Davis
ua-cam.com/video/xXsrwBRygYU/v-deo.html : Barry Trower, physicien expert, dénonce les micro ondes et le Wi-Fi ; Chris Montclar
ua-cam.com/video/nXqHQ6J8YM4/v-deo.html : Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech
ua-cam.com/video/-D176962AdU/v-deo.html : [interview] Impact des ondes sur le fœtus - Barry Trower
ua-cam.com/video/eMlXO4VqR8Q/v-deo.html : Senator Speaks Freely on 5G HARM
ua-cam.com/video/p3En4dbEvqA/v-deo.html : Danger de la 5G : cri d'alarme (The Fullertone Informer = John Briana)
ua-cam.com/video/OBgtnGREn-s/v-deo.html : 50.000 satellites 5G, pour quoi faire ? Entretien avec Jean-Marie LOPEZ, astronome
ua-cam.com/video/XvYwBGUevPw/v-deo.html : The 60 Gigahertz And WiGiG Reality #JOEIMBRIANO ; The Fullertone Informer
ua-cam.com/channels/aLwcpzmAp9cYPmMdKmhb9g.html : EMF Safety Zone
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029112
www.babysafeproject.org : Yale University Medical Non-Profit ; www.emfhelpcenter.com
www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions (Over 1800 Studies - EMF's cause DNA Damage, even Mitochondrial DNA! ) ; www.emfscientist.com : 253 EMF scientists from 44 nations have signed the Appeal
showthefineprint.org/see-the-fine-print (Health Liability WARNINGS from Wireless Manufactures)
www.scribd.com/lists/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies : Over 960 Studies which Demonstrate EMF's Cause HARM
www.emfresearch.com/emfs-male-fertility : 135 PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES & REPORTS SHOWING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF EMF EXPOSURES ON MALE FERTILITY (1972-2012).
web.archive.org/web/20190118210026/www.justproveit.net/studies : Compilation of 1,000's of Studies on the HARMFUL effects of EMF's. (Wayback Machine Strikes again!) ...
kompetenzinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Hensinger_Wilke_2016_umg_Engl.pdf : Wireless communication technologies: New study findings confirm risks of non-ionizing radiation
www.emf-portal.org/en emfsafetynetwork.org ; www.emfanalysis.com
www.retrouversonnord.be/Pollutions_Electromagnetiques.htm ; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206838 ; www.electricsense.com ; www.saferemr.com
www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/electromagnetic-radiation + www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/electromagnetic-radiation ; centerforsaferwireless.us/web/main
www.demain-conseils.com/systeme-immunitaire-affaibli-ondes ; www.hippocrates-electrosmog-appeal.be/international ; ehtrust.org ; c4st.org ; phiremedical.org
www.researchgate.net/publication/44685415_Mobile_Phone_Mast_Effects_on_Common_Frog_Rana_temporaria_Tadpoles_The_City_Turned_into_a_Laboratory
www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/high-exposure-radio-frequency-radiation-associated-cancer-male-rats = ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/cellphones/index.cfm : Cancer Tumors on rats from EMF
www.emfdata.org/en/studies/detail?id=509 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834628 ; www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 www.researchgate.net/publication/309358226_The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5746641/Experts-warn-radiation-WiFi-power-lines-poses-credible-threat-Earths-species.html
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46047/1/MPRA_paper_46047.pdf ; mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects www.academia.edu/36283244/The_Effect_of_EMF_Radiation_Emitted_by_Mobile_Phone_to_Insect_Population_using_Drosophila_melanogaster_as_a_Model_Organism
www.economist.com/comment/2937377 ; www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext ;
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719337805 ; inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44058782
That is still putting away all the other scams on other fields, making the context so much + suspicious, it becomes obvious who you're dealing with... Not incompetence, negligence, inertia of research or lazy unawareness. They know very well.
@@bobcoco6047
You didn’t answer my question. If it’s non ionising radiation than how exactly is it harmful?
Non ionising radiation will warm you a little, that’s all. How does being warmed a little harm people?
@@parajacks4 The answer is in the links, yet indeed my direct reply wasn't on target.
Non ionising radiations won't "only warm your skin", actually in most cases, it doesn't, due to low power.
The fundamental misconception hinges precisely on the premise the only harm radiations could do to us, is heat. All the bro-science studies from the national/global institutions (WHO, FDA, FTC, FCC, NIH, ICNIRP, you name it) are based on this assumption, therefore they only look for heat effects, find nothing, then conclude it's harmless, & everyone happily believes them.
The DAS standard has been built on that same idea, the "biological" tests were applied to a plastic dummy, for 15min, supervised by engineers, aka not biologists. Is it enough for you? That's what we call pseudo-science, or a SCAM.
All these organizations have conflicts of interests with telecom companies, lobbies, & some of those planning the 5G + IA + Transhumanism agenda today (but nothing new, it's been long time we have evidences).
So, the 1st major point is, stop looking for thermal effects, they're the least important. The effects we're talking about here, are long term (depending on ppl's body, think of it like a battery/reserve of resistance).
They imply cancer (any type, depending on the exposition/location; easy to remember expl: ladies with breast tumors exactly at the emplacement of their cellphone... Between their tits), immunodeficiency, unplanned avortions, cognitive deterioration, weird changes in behaviors (animals mainly), chronic pains (notably headaches), chronic oxidative stress, chronic fatigue, anxiety, early aging, infertility, & some + ...
The way it affects us is through magnetic field going all across the body (where the electric field only goes on the skin), & makes random damages to biological/metabolic/biochemical processes. & there are lots of, at various frequencies. For instance, some ions rotates & oscillates at specific frequencies, such as 55hz for the magnesium one; if the frequency of the artificial EMF is close enough, you get some resonance effect (diapason) which prevents the biochemical reactions to occur as they should, inducing a chain of dysfunction. This is why some ppl freak out with WiGig & 5G, targeting the frequency of Oxygen absorption.
www.imec-int.com/cache/pdfs/en/imec-magazine/imec-magazine-april-2017/60ghz-technology-for-wigig-and-5g-applications.pdf
ua-cam.com/video/XvYwBGUevPw/v-deo.html : The 60 Gigahertz And WiGiG Reality #JOEIMBRIANO ; The Fullertone Informer
Last point I'll make, is EMF are usually characterized by power (Watt) / flux (W/m²) / Voltage (V) / Frequency (hz), so that some common arguments such as "the Sun beams xxGhz frequencies, at xxxV/m², which is much higher than your phone, → it's stoopid believing the phone is harmful", which again, relies on the same type of fallacy as the 1st point: harm doesn't only hinge on power. It happens the PULSED character of artificial EMFs, are a major point making them harmful, for expl.
So I encourage you to dig a bit further, bc it might be determinant in the current circumstances.
Second
wait its just 1/5th ..... so you are a traffic junction with 10 cars ... would you cross the limit ???
parthasarathy Venkatadri radiation intensity drops with distance from the source. This measure was at the source, the intensity as measured from right outside the vehicle would probably be difficult to even detect.
@@arispelius600 ok
Proof is in the meter not advice. You needs to test with a proper meter. Compare with a cell phone and microwave oven and test the vehicle.
When everybody will use electriccars dont theywillmake a bigg ass elecromagnetic problems?
Wrong, disagree, if the recommended amount is 0.40 teslarbars and a Hybrid measures 0.50 over. Then only God knows how much over is a fully electric car. Not convinced, I will stick to old technology thanks.