Is the 5G Radiation From Your Phone Killing You? Using GQ EMF-390 EMF Meter
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2021
- Get your own 5G (EMF) meter here: www.gqelectronicsllc.com/emfi...
I measure the 5G signal from my phone and from cell towers.
My UA-cam shorts channel: / @actionlabshorts
Get Your Experiment Box Here: theactionlab.com/
Checkout my experiment book: amzn.to/2Wf07x1
Follow me on Twitter: / theactionlabman
Facebook: / theactionlabofficial
Instagram: / therealactionlab - Наука та технологія
"In this video we will test if 5G is dangerous"
"So here's a bit of URANIUM"
You have my attention sir
I'd be more impressed if he had plutonium. 😂
Let's try splitting one of the atoms
Next episode : convert steal in gold .
@@scaricraft3995 *steel
@@deepakjain7259 *lead
This is the reason I was against the cell tower on the roof of our building, I was not afraid of the radiation, but crappy signal. It is way better when it is mounted on the opposing building:)
69th like
He did say they are not dangerous but a phone gives off more than the towers
Same here. I was using AT&T Wireless (PCS), and happy with it until AT&T put a cell site on top of my building. My cellphone became useless at home. I changed carriers and eventually moved because of it. It was a huge dead zone in and around the building.
I agree, not in my backyard, in this case "not in my roof top".
@@voodoochile7581 Right - a tiny end user cellphone gives off more then a tower serving thousands xD
Would have been great to also see how the meter detected 3G and 4G as a comparison as well.
3G is going off. 5G uses all frequencies, same as 3G. LTE is most common, I don't really think that meter is going to tell exactly whats going on. The real 5G is hardly being implemented yet.
@@gregsz1ful yeah, you're pointing out one of the huge problems with nay sayers. 5g is implemented across a variety of bands. I think TMobile has them here in Denver. The stuff is insanely fast, but the signals can't even make it through the walls of my apartment. Most "5g" towers are really just a protocol upgrade from 4g. They are not the high bandwidth ultra high frequency transmitters. Those are reserved for high density areas. The lower frequency is designed for penetrating walls and long distances at the trade of bandwidth.
Also how come cell phone providers don't have EMF meter's at there location's. It would be nice to know if your phone is not making you sick. Like bad headaches, and blurry vision from blue light.🤔👍😎
@@waynefrench9314 There are standards by some government safety stuff. Dangers have been discussed for years. How about classrooms where all the kids have pads and phones. EMF meters are not used for detection. RF meters are. EMF is basically low frequency magnetic radiation, like an electric motor. Many of these cell tower crazies never talk about or measure the phone itself, right on your ear.
@@gregsz1ful omg, i just got a perfect product idea, thnks
I enjoy your experiments so much! Thank you for sharing your knowledge and your love to educate us. YOU DA MAN!!!
I'm laughing at this: " YOU DA MAN!!!"
@@NominePater, we're laughing at you!
@@topherkrock That's your
freedom.
@@NominePater, it is. I love the truth.
@@topherkrock “Wikileaks.. specialise in bringing the First Amendment to the world, and we were always very surprised one of our biggest battles would be trying to bring it to the United States”.
I predict this will be one of your most watched videos ever.
EDIT: Unless the UA-cam algorithm blocks it
here before 100k views
I was here too yolo
Wait till the ignorant Karen's find it.
Along for the ride!
I was here - 7th august
idk if 5g is killing me but it's definitely killing my phone battery
There's an article that will make a 5G smartphone be charge using, of course, thru 5G itself but the technology isn't coming next year or next next year. So maybe i'll buy a 5G smartphone capable of charging using its 5G in the near future, hahaha! I'll wait for that since i'm still young!
@@KokoJeuru bruhh just imagine the energy lost due to distance
@@crystal_royal3405 They'd have to intensify the waves, which would suck. Wifi and 5g already affect meteorology.
So does android get better mobile data signal then iphone ?
@@handlebendover do you really need it tho
Thank you very much for such a wonderful video this is an issue I've been concerned about for at least a year or more.
1:01 That one sentence made me understand that. when you have long wavelengths it acts more like a wave, that makes so much sense
imagine being click-baited to learn, every single one of his video thumbnail is like this. I'm not even mad, this is amazing
"lot of click"
Pretty much sums up his videos. 10/10 would click again
All propaganda & bs narrative.
Hey bots, what's Cambridge Analytica style farms paying these days? Better then zionists?
You know what’s more dangerous than 5G? Standing in the middle of the road measuring 5G.
The side walkway path he is standing on: 👀
HA HA HA
😂👏👏👏👏
Isn't holding the uranium so close dangerous?
Hmm
One thing I didn't hear mentioned when discussing the Geiger counter is that those clicks you heard before the sample was brought close was mostly from the natural background radiation that you are constantly exposed to every day.
In my area, it's about 19 CPM which is a pretty normal average. You don't start getting into elevated danger territory until you start getting about 100 CPM sustained.
He says that.
cpm is not a standard unit. Depending on the counter you are using you can get very different cpm backgrounds and sensitivities.
Why did all the ionized radio stop when his phone was close? No clicks.
@@titanthegreat Three reasons: depending on the natural background radiation (19CPM in my area) I would expect to hear only 19 clicks every minute on average. In the brief time his phone was near the disk there may not have been any particles or rays detected. The phone was partially covering the disk which will itself block alpha and beta particles from reaching the disk (gamma would still easily pass through the phone. Finally, it may have been too far from his mic to hear the subtle one or two clicks.
Yeah every sunny day that's 1 year dose of radiation per day if you get sunburned 😂
I can’t wait till 7G so my downloads happen before I even think of them.
I was expecting more conspiracy comments than this. True testament to the quality of your video brother.
4g was already proven to cause cancer
It operates at 3.5ghz radiation
5g operates at microwave frequencies
90ghz to 300ghz
Another thing that operates between 90 to 300ghz is the "active denial system" which can cause a burning sensation under the skin, or individual organ failure at high power
@@ChaosBW i can't speak
@@ChaosBW they are evil man, blocking all things i say that are 100% based in logic
@@ChaosBW wrong
@@helpabrothawithasubisaiah5316 Sure, we might not have done all the testing for all frequencies, but that doesn't justify being too hysterical about this radiation. I've yet to see anyone explain the mechanism for how radio or microwaves at these intensities could possibly do any harm. But either way, then sure, I am positive to any research on the health effects of the frequency range to be partially used with the 5G network.
"This ore can break DNA and cause cancer"
Also him: *bring that ore next to his heart 16 sec straight*
Relax .
@Hedwig Quan I know u probably know this but it’s incredibly short time with a low dose so it’s probably less than half an x-ray so it’s not to bad
I wouldn't be surprised if he just had it in his pocket all day
The radiation from the uranium ore is still fairly weak
The uranium is stable.
Excellent demonstration. Thank you
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE!
PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3
UTUBE : p NODE
SUMSCO VANPAT
I work exclusively on MMWave 5G and the only adverse effects I’ve experienced is fatigue from working my ass off building the stuff 12-16 hrs a day. People freak out over shit they don’t have a clue about.
Yeah it's true, ignorance is the most dangerous weapon
Increased mortality in the last several years (after 5G towers) is like 25% in most western countries.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo I can't believe I am reading this, you either are a bot to troll us or the stupidity made person
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo Most of the particular western country I live doesn't have any 5G! It would be truly astonishing if mortality has increased by 25% due to 5G.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo, you're just lying to people.
"So, you can hear a lot of 'clicks' when i bring this ore close"
My brain the entire clip: WHY ARE YOU BRINGING IT CLOSE TO YOUR HEART BRUH
LOL I thought the same thing. Like, is that a good idea my dude?
This is such a little amount i would not be worried if 10x the amount would be close to me and radiation through your heart isn't a big problem as well, as long as it won't go through your brains
@@biem7091 you have zero humor
@@deplorableredneck4.02 wdym
@@biem7091 not to mention he doesn't even tell the setting of the Geiger counter.
You can make Geiger counters go crazy with the clicks just off of atmospheric radiation.
It's a good trick to make people think something is very dangerous.
Next would be the type of particles being emitted off the small piece of uranium. You skin, and clothes stop most subatomic particles. And this piece was inside a bag.
@av 26 Anywho, I've had uranium sitting on my dresser since I was 6. That piece is about the size of my fist. Also I worked nuclear in the navy and civilian plants. I've worked right next to an operating reactor. Radiation wasn't my great at that moment, heat was. My work boots sole melts to the metal on the floor. We typically only had a 10 to 15 minute stay time, due to heat in the area.
1w per square meter but only in a tiny area, which means you're actually getting only a fraction of a W total, probably like 20 miliwatts. it would take a cellphone at full blast over a year to heat your body by 1 degree, IF you weren't able to dissipate heat
Sounds like you're making assumptions, nothing more.
Sure, then you should be calling up all the carries and offering up the side of your house, preferably where your bedroom is, to be 5G nodes for all of them. You will be rich, and perfectly healthy... until you are not.
@@AaronAlso i'd love to hear YOUR reasoning. except i already know where it came from so yeah don't bother.
@@AaronAlso Do you have the cell phone company number where I allow them to put in cell tower in my bedroom in exchange for lots of money? If not, STFU with your FUD.
It is one watt to your eye or brain tissue, and I'm not very worried about my toes actually
Your microphone is interacting with the device and your heart...much love. ❤
Like a subwoofer speaker, the radiation of sound develops over distance. If I stand next to a sub-woofer, I will not hear the sound as loud, as if I were standing 33 feet away from it. As you pointed out, a low frequency wave is very long, and a high frequency wave is very short.
Wait-your subwoofer is phased array?
Modern 4g towers can actually control the direction of the beam. These type of antenna used today normally only radiate in one direction. There is almost no electrical field directly under or above an antenna, as this would be wasted energy.
"One direction" is perhaps exaggeration, a 60-degree sector antenna is pretty standard, with the center somewhat lower than the horizon.
5G technologies rely heavily on beamforming to carry millimeter waves around obstacles, using multiple overlapping antennas to produce directional interference patterns. 4G systems can also use beamforming, but spatial streams can only reduce emitted power by allowing higher selectivity. Beamforming also requires an array of antennas, and as you get closer and closer to the ideal ray aimed at a user's phone, you need more and more area claimed by antennas.
Check out keysight's "5g engineering is amazing" video if you want to learn more.
There isn't much signal from the tower, but devices in that area can radiate more due to poor coverage.
@@dougaltolan3017 there's _no_ signal from the tower! It's just there to hold things up. As for directional antennas, they've been around for a hundred years. I love it when idiots assume that everything is a SECRET WEAPON when it's just radio. Beamforming has been around since the '80s. And most lasers are very weak. All this tinfoil hat nonsense has got to go...
@@StringerNews1 You seriously need learn to read and wind your neck in. "The tower" can also mean Everything above ground level: mast, cables, cell antennae and microwave links.
There IS signal from the tower near the base AS SHOWN IN THE VIDEO, it has been measured, calcated and demonstrated in Many examples, but, as I posted the bulk of radiation there is from devices that experience poor coverage and as a result radiate more than usual.
So, learn to read, learn to listen and be prepared for the fact that you donk know it all.
This was very very widely published in the 90's (perhaps before you were born)
The thing I love about this is that it’s not demeaning, patronising or anything. There are people who have concerns and all he does is present the information to better understand the technology in a productive way. As a scientist this is attitude is such a pleasant thing to witness and is sorely needed in community. No one likes intellectually abused and harassed.
We need more people like this who just want to help others understand and aren’t judgmental towards others! As demonstrated in this video it isn’t hard to just view your fellow humans with respect and communicate clearly with them.
Great video!
You dont have a long therm experiment to assume that there is any hazards on that technology
First off - science is not a field or a profession. It is a method of evaluating our physical realm, and its scope does not exceed this physical realm and that which can be directly observed. The term "scientist" itself is deceptive, because anyone calling themselves that is akin to a carpenter calling himself a table saw or a construction worker calling himself a dump truck. No, you're not a scientist - nobody is. There are only people who apply the scientific method as part of an attempt to gain a better understanding of some kind of physical phenomena...but the reasons for doing so are varied.
Secondly, nobody with a significant amount of preconceived notions that are largely rooted in degenerate leftard politics can call themselves a "scientist" and expect to be taken seriously. It's well-known that RF, especially in certain frequency ranges, are harmful. The meme of ionizing radiation is just that - another unproven hoax floated along with the 1960s anti-nuclear energy propaganda campaigns. Let us guess - you also believe red meat and sugar is BAAAAAAAD for consumption, because science (even though not an iota of science supports these claims). You've already taken the idiotic position that the EMF emitted by phones and other wireless electronics is safe, and that the plebs just need to be explainerized more betterer. That's the most imbecilic position anyone could take. Do you walk around with a diaper strapped to your face?
The trouble is, it's generally the people selling measures to counteract it that are the real malicious ones, less so the people just peddling those ideas because they came from an apparently credible source
@@alphaforce6998 Are you quite alright?
@@barryhomeowner9293 Are you?
"Huh huh a lot of clicks" as he holds it with bare hands close to his heart.
Also I just saw that you can turn off 5G on your phone - it moves to LTE 4G - you could do a comparison between the two.
We need to visualise theory for better concept clearance this is what action lab doing so well love your content
This guys channel is killing it! I remember watching his videos when he was at 30k subscribers. Now he’s everywhere. It’s guys like this that deserve our attention, not tik-tok stars getting views from eating tidepods
Exactly. Science needs more interest
Now they brush their teeth with sand paper soaked in cleaning chemicals.
@@sinisterthoughts2896 good I'll send them some bleach and dog shit sandwiches
Tide pods? What do you think this is….2010?
yup, hes an absolute madman, he made videos that I never even thought of (like being able to see magnetic waves, mirror room, the self moving fish thingy, sound illusions, simulation theory, I could list more if I have to)
Here in Australia my Provider uses the same bands for 5G as 4G. The bands we use are 1.8GHz, 2.3GHz, 2.6GHz and 3.4GHz. Indoor coverage is rather 1.8GHz or 2.6GHz bands here in Australia.
IEEE has a safety standard for human exposure to EF, MF, and EMF. Std c95.1 -2019/Cor 2- 2020. Says from 2khz to 100kz 1842 V/m or 10,000 W/m^2 is the limit for persons in restricted environments. For magnetic fields from 1khz to 3ghz its 0.6mT-1.13mT (Head torso - limbs). Based on the numbers I saw on his meter and my own readings with the same meter, phones are still 1000-10,000x less than the recommend limit
Right. It's all safe.
As a qualified Radio Amateur, of over 30 years, I can assure you, your phone will never harm you, unless you drop it on your foot.
The levels of RF emissions from any device, is miniscule compared to the RF coming from the Sun.
Right and isn’t the whole reason for having FCC stickers on tons of devices to say that this device does stay within the length of its radio wave, and not just sending random ass waves interfering with other devices or potentially harmful?
@Porco Porco Radio radiation is not ionizing. You maybe should watch that video.
@Porco Porco Have you watched the video.?
It is clear, Radio is NOT like Nuclear at all. Radio is NON Ionising, and harmless, whereas Nuclear is Ionising Radiation and quite deadly.
Your Microwave is in a tuned steel box, AKA a Faraday Cage. In any case, any slight leakage would only burn.
Its all in the Physics.
Arthur Firstenberg would disagree.
@Porco Porco My friend I think you're confused as to how radiation works. Ionising radiation is dangerous because it can mutate your DNA and cause cancer. Any other radiation can only burn and is not dangerous. Radiowaves and Microwaves are the least dangerous. The Microwave oven is only dangerous if you put something with molecules that can be affected by the waves inside it e.g Water.
People just don't understand basic physics...well done by the way...good presentation and accurate...Radio waves...even those in the microwave band are non-ionizing...the worst they can do is burn you...and that's if you're handling the transmitter on a tower or the cables...I am an Extra Class HAM radio operator and was an engineer for a TV station and Radio Station for a few years and went out to the primary antenna site where megawatts of RF energy were flying around...no big deal as long as I was careful with the Coax Cables and Microwave Ducting...🤷♂️ it could become very hot...enough to cook birds...but the wavelength was far too long to damage DNA...people need to pay attention in physics class...sheesh...🤦♂️
people just assume that all waves are the same. that, and bringing up how much radiation the sun gives off makes the people say "bUt iTs nAtUraL!!"
wait isn't physics about thing's falling and stuff not some waves
@@pedropedrohan102 any interaction with matter to matter, matter to energy, and energy to energy, is physics. "things falling" is only a small part of it.
@@static7985 ok
Thanks for the video!
In India there are thousand of cell towers on public residential buildings
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE!
PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3
UTUBE : p NODE
SUMSCO VANPAT
I ALSO LEARNED 5g CAN SPLIT URANIUM ATOMS HUMANS ONLY MADE OF cARBON..
I love that you chose this topic and hope you will continue exploring it in your videos. Your personality, curiosity, and visual aporoach makes learning/exploring science easier and much more fun . Thank you!
Holding a beautiful piece of uranium,
in his hand and near his heart, he says,
"It's radiation is very dangerous" :)
In a physics class in school this is an opportunity for further teaching, (1) demonstrating the acute drop-off as the uranium sample moved only a couple of centimetres away from the Geiger counter, as can be seen in the video, and (2) talking about how one's epidermis stops things like alpha particles and ultra-violet except at extremely short ranges/high intensities, but not beta particles or gamma rays.
Find a different source than the WHO.
What's nice is that he's completely safe the whole time. The piece of uranium ore is the most dangerous thing in the video.
Can you tell me why you are on here comment at least twise a week for over a year?
@@DaBigBoo_, the truth never sleeps.
The road is much more dangerous.
”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”
~ George Carlo PhD
@@Fifasher2Kcause of all the towers, aye?
@@londonuntergunther252, you keep lying to people. You must be a bot.
I like How He Just Has Some Uranium in his House
I have 40kBq of Americium-241. You probably do too. In the smoke detector.
And he held it right next to his chest for a good amount of time too! He’s a brave man
@@btat16 Not really. Radiation is inside all of us as well. It isn't that dangerous.
Shouldn't that uranium ore be store in a lead pouch?
Holding that small amount of uranium near his chest insn't really that dangerous considering there are people who have to work with similar materials daily.
I was hoping you would measure radiation under powerlines, while holding up a fluorescent tube that's lit up "wirelessly"
Nothing to worry about, that would be the static electric field. All that would do would give you an itch.
@@tomctutor how is it static? It oscillates at 50/60Hz
@@tomctutor way to go brainer🤘😁
Nikola Tesla lived to 86 and died from a heart attack, those electric fields aren't dangerous.
@@WolfangStudios73 Still a high electric field intensity whether its AC or not. ↯
The phone vs Sennheiser test makes perfect sense. The 5G network protocol employs many different bands at once to find the best connection, whereas the mic transmitter only works on one band at a time, selectable through the RF menu on the device.
Interesting that almost no EMF was detected from the phone or router. Does your meter read all three frequencies at once, or do you have to select which set your measuring? i.e, turn a knob from RF to EMF?
That meter reads all of it at once but you can switch it to focus on a certain one. I have the same meter and it surprisingly does not come up with much EMF anywhere except when I'm near power lines or an electrical field.
The sound of the detector against uranium is like the sound in Oppenheimer.....Cool....
That's probably because the movie went for a sense of realism.
World Health Organization?? Not an outfit that has anyone’s best interests at heart!
more like world death
when flying i always select seat 5G so that i can use my phone during the flight.
I sit in 2B, or not 2B. Depending on how philosophical I'm feeling.
@@labibbidabibbadum R2 for me....
@@ronumpleby3517, I choose C3, but if it's not available, then I go with P0.
I remember that hand-held phones were to be limited to 600 mW. The old car phones could put out 5 watts since the antennae were not in your face.
The concern is effects over a very, very long period of time with consistent exposure. Which there are almost no studies on, especially in the US where there are huge amounts of money preventing such studies being done. Yes, we all know it’s nothing like actual radiation which causes harm within a short period of time, but what we don’t know is the effects of this more minor radiation over 20 years. To simply ignore the potential, with a lack of studies, is ignorant.
yes
I work in this industry. I would really like to know the long term effects also.
@@joepromedio I will say that there have been some German studies on the long term effects and they did not look too good. If you’re in the industry I would really urge you to look and try to find some of those in other countries. I think I remember reading there was a significantly increased number of people developing cancer who lived near a cell tower. The US is just too corrupt with too many lobbyist for this stuff for now
Yeah... no studies exist at all regarding long term 5G exposure. But why do people even care? The only people who think that might be cause for concern are those who really do not understand physics. Why? Because the sun exists. Nobody is concerned about dying early because the sun exists. Therefore nobody in their right mind should be concerned about piddly little 5G
Research Barry Trower.
Can't wait for people to say "6G will kill you! I'll stick to 5G"
Lmao
ua-cam.com/video/XKri2X7HNtM/v-deo.html
@@WillSurvive2TheEnd you know everything has radiation
there wont be 6G (probably) cause 5G is the best it can physically get
Laughs at 4G
Did you test the cell phone radiation while on a call? While on wifi vs cellular? And while sending sms? Interesting note, atmospheric radiation is higher while flying. Wonder how many pilots suffer from flying daily vs the land bound traveler. Love your content, always look forward to your new uploads.
yep, so much utter INSANITY in the industry today...like this is one aspect, and did you know that AIR in motorcycle helmets can easily reach 10,000 ppm of Co2 in a short space of time? Basically what that means is you are now a MASSIVE liability to safety on the roadways...how many times have you even heard a peep about such? Probably the first time. So when you have absolutely SOLVABLE issues like this in tech / products, it really makes you wonder how we got to such a point...Be an absolutely amazing opportunity to save lives AND make money if someone were to take THE BASICS into account when designing those helmets...and the absolutely atrocious use of tech in 4-6g wifi is exactly along the same lines when it comes to health...these are facts, yet of coarse greedy tech companies that are owned by CEO's with the same mentality are criminally negligent ON ALL THESE currently.
@@opopopop6286 that tinfoil hat must be getting a little hot
Half a mill paid salary die younger… Sad but true
He has another video just like one except he tests the phone while on calls and other ways as well.
Thanks for the info. It would be cool if you did a follow-up video ranking the various home internet options by how much EMF they put in your house. Low to High - Cable Modem with cable connections. Cable Modem with wifi.
- Dish outside cabled to Modem and devices. Dish cabled to Modem - wifi to devices.
- All data with hot spot and tethering to devices
- Cell Modem (like T-Mobile) cabled to device. Cell Modem wifi to devices. Thanks!
He could, but what's the point? If it's safe, it's safe.
Just FYI: even if you are completely hardwired in your house with no wifi, there still can be some large wifi sources. I discovered my Direct TV receiver, by the TV, although completely hardwired to the dish outside, was emitting strong signals to the local tower - 20,000-30,000 mW/m2 - and could not be shut down. Also, my TV was emitting a very powerful Bluetooth signal in the same range we could stop. I have a meter, so I was able to find them - can't beat having your own meter.
@@badhare663, but it's safe. What is the concern?
Fun fact:
Radiation levels near the base of a mast can be many times higher than further away.
Not because of the signal from the mast, but fom mobile devices "screaming" to find reception in what is an area of poor coverage.
That wasn’t very fun…
Just some food for thought: the average intensity of sunlight hitting our planet all the time is around 300 W/m^2, which on this meter would have registered 300 000 (300 000 mW/m^2).
Here's some more food for thought: If there was some kind of shadowy cabal that didn't have our best interests at heart that was ready and willing to deliberately cause adverse health side effects - who's to say that the manufacturer of this meter isn't a member of said shadowy cabal?
@@ColonelSandersLite truth
@King Pistachion You're a good repeater of their slogans... Put your face diaper back on and obey.
@King Pistachion It was a conspiracy theory that Johnson and Johnson was covering up the potential adverse health effects of their baby powder right up until it wasn't.
The very first sentence of this video is "Today we're going to be testing if the [signal] from your [personal communications device] is going to [lethally incapacitate you] or not".
I'm all for such testing. I'm merely playing devils advocate and pointing out a potential flaw in the test.
More food the sunlight covers ir visible uv etc..... this is just the 5g frequency we are concerned about. And yes the uv portion of sunlight will damage your eyes and burn your skin...
to better understand why the signal got stronger further away from the tower, look into the geometry of a magnetic field and how flux spirals out of one pole and into the other. The geometry of the torus
Thanks for the demonstration. I have a few questions.
04:20 you said it’s not much higher than the standard electromagnetic waves that are around us. Does that mean it’s always safe to be within these waves and there isn’t any way they can cause harm?
07:40 you said the waves aren’t necessarily dangerous, but then you brought up an article from the WHO website and mentioned that there’s not a lot of studies on it. Don’t you think that’s a little unwise of them to do?
No, it's wise of them not to release the studies that show negative affects if they benefit from it.
The WHO did something arbitrary and without study or fact. I do love how people, that are completely against entities like the WHO and generally go against all their guidelines, will suddenly tout this boneheaded decision of theirs.
Your cell phone WILL KILL YOU, 'cause you're going to be preoccupied looking at something on your phone, and then step into traffic, and get smacked by a very large "particle", known as a bus !
Studied as the “Pokémon GO” phenomenon
@@ethanmacleod1721 "Oh, is that an Ekans or a Car?"
Morgan Freeman: It wasn't an Ekans
What about the cliff
I bet theres a number of people that died in fires started by their smartphone battery. So they can be leathal^^
Kid got isekai'd
Only thing I know about cellphone towers is the ones in rural or suburban areas that are slightly forested is that the small animal and insect population is tiny or nonexistent in the area that is within about 300 to 600 yards of the tower while the rest of the area will have your normal insect and small animal populations. Ones that are the most noticeable is I never hear cicadas in the area around the tower even if there is a large number of trees around the tower but you walk down the road a couple blocks and you hear the cicadas again.
Nature doesn’t lie but the governments do.
I’m now disabled since all cell towers and other RF meters became very close to me.
I didn’t think it was an issue until I did research on the dates these things were installed. That’s when I started to get sick by something no doctor I have met with can help me with.
I’m not a tin hat but I don’t believe in coincidences.
If anyone else has noticed this with your heath please reply to this post.
@@susana5052 you are disabled??
@@fulaan1 Yes I am. I’m 100% disabled and getting worse each day. I’ve been trying to move but it’s not been easy. Everybody’s playing California so the prices are going up everywhere.
I basically need to get away from all the electronics in the city.
@@susana5052 how are you writing this message
@@TwoForFlinchin1 with a cellphone with an EMF protector. Yes it does work. I had my electrician scan it with some kind of machine he uses. I also had him scan some other things in my home including my TV. The router is the one that uses a lot of power and produces a lot of bad energy. I had that moved on the other side of the house. I also sit at least 10 feet away from the TV.
I climb communication Towers like that for a living you're always going to receive levels of radiation farther away because they project in some whatever bubble that doesn't start for about 100 feet away from the tower also would be interesting to put that thing up against a television transmitter or an FM radio transmitter
I would love to see a study on cell phone use and if it correlates to an increase of anixety and/or anger in humans
It doesn't. No correlation or causation.
Phones, no. Twitter, yes.
One thing you didn't test was using your cell phone near the tower. 5G directs and concentrates signal to your phone. This will significantly increase the cell tower radiation in the proximity of your phone. I'd be curious to see you testing that scenario
Beam forming has not been implemented for mid-band. It was supposed to be for High-band 28/39Ghz Millimeter Wave spectrum.
hes lying 5g towers are dangerous they are short wave! 5g is bad no matter where its coming from. this would be controlled opposition. wake tf up peeps!
@@irock5624 amazing way of saying " I know absolutely nothing about radiation or wave lengths, btw I never payed attention in science class because of my lack of intelligence, instead I'll just listen to my crazy mothers Facebook groups because I'm an ignorant American"
Theye can fry you when your targeted
@@Test7017 really so like wouldnt it be really bad for the dude who installs them and flips them on and a standing right there next to it while it's running?
Damn, and here I thought 5G will turn me into whatever I wished for.
ua-cam.com/video/XKri2X7HNtM/v-deo.html
naw, mostly just triggers the bioweapon in the death shots to genocide half the world when they send the signal after they get more people to take their mad science shot.. Wow, i wish that was as crazy as it sounds...
only ur BRAIN can do that
@@aboma733 shut up
@@ferdgerbeler8494 let's go I dont have to worry about my future so when is the genocide so I can die in a sick explosion the day before
Conflict of Interest. Let's talk about that, as it relates to "studies" and information on this subject...
The Action Lab: Don't use 5G!
Me: Ok *still uses it*
Unrelated but interesting fact about radiation:
Till today, Marie Curie’s office chair and doorknob are 10 times more radioactive than background radiation. 🤯
So are emissions and tailings from all coal power plants.
Did you know that red pottery and bananas are radioactive?
@@digitexstudios5634 yes
Did you know there is a difference between radiation and ionizing radiation? Ionizing is the nasty one.
@@digitexstudios5634 yeah
I worked in RF in the cell phone industry. I can tell you that the lower wavelengths have higher penetration through solid materials. Also, that long term exposure can cause issues, use loudspeaker or a headset whenever possible. Never let children use phone next to head. Never sleep on phone. Go to airplane mode at night.
The way that RF could cause DNA damage is by jiggling DNA replicase during cell division causing it to make more mistakes.. I think that it would need to be low frequencies to do this like 50-60 Hz radiation from power lines.
@@119beaker 'Boom cars' play 50-60Hz regularly. They often have huge subwoofers with massive magnets, positioned just inches from the driver's and passengers' heads, with anywhere from 1kW to 30kW of power running to them.
Tens of millions of people who have systems like that in their vehicles have been playing those freqs over 150dB DAILY for 30 years now, and there is no health issue that has ever come of it, so, there's definitely no need to be concerned about the "bass" spectrum of frequencies.
@@staywhite6332 not necessarily, frequencies that low usually get removed from the song by engineers because it can damage listeners ears/monitors used in certain venues. Specifically in closed settings like clubs and bars. They also degrade the overall mix aw frequencies that low are easier felt than heard.
@@lockretta9114 No.
We do not do any such thing.
Signed, a real, actual sound engineer, for 30 years, now.
@@lockretta9114 Actual venues, including clubs and bars, almost always have their own sound mixer, no matter how basic. That way they can tune the sound of their playlists to whatever speaker equipment they have, to not blow out their speakers on a heavy bass track, and in general just make their own setup sound better.
Hey look at this Geiger counter! I'm going to put it right next to my microphone which I placed over my heart so you can hear it well. Meanwhile, your heart starts pumping harder knowing the end is near! Lol
Great very informative
Man thanks a lot for making our days and minds brighter and smarter, I truly appreciate your work.
"so now let's see if our phones emit ionizing radiation"
**Geiger counter starts beeping very fast**
**Smiles nervously**
Lol
Yup.
They call it COVID-19. Do your research on the Vodafone executive who exposes the scam! The pandemic is a coverup for the rollout of the deadly technology. Billions will die worldwide as the towers go up, and the "internet of things" take over.
@@sunnyreads1845 yes the symptoms are from the new signals we are recieving. Glad some still have a functioning brain. So sad that wr are being fried like bugs.
They hate us( Gods Children) but we are very protected, to be alive right now !
Let's all pray against the evil. God Bless All.
@@thelight9109 God Bless you!
The “normal range” has been changed and will continue to change when the corporations need it to.
THIS is a good video.......................................thank you Sir
So that's why I get that warm feeling talking time my mom on my cell phone! 🙂😊😁
Ya, because the phone gets warm, not because of the radiation.
Thank you for making the point of the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. This is very important to understand. The signal is stronger when you get a bit further from the tower because of the “umbrella” effect of the signal pattern from the antennas.
It's actually not that important at all to understand considering the microwaves emitted in a microwave are non-ionizing. The process for them to *become* ionizing has to do with the shield plate within the microwave which is used to filter-reflect the non-ionizing microwaves so they bounce within the chamber of the emitter until they attain the resonance factor required to pass through the filter - which is designed to be the gain of resonance of *ionizing radiation.* Which should be common sense. It's a wave. Just like sound waves, just like liquid waves, there is such thing as resonance factor. This is why when you microwave a grape it doesn't just "cook". It bursts into pure high-heated plasma. Look it up watch a video. This is due to the grape being the same size of the microwave oven's matured wavelength.
This is not just a factor that happens by resonance alone. This can also happen by multiple waves collapsing upon each other of the same resonance frequencies or waves in octaves. Right now I have hundreds of 5G wifi routers around me. I can hear it. It sounds like hundreds of tambourines. These frequencies are in the similar ranges as the military ADS device which cooks skin on people in crowds at 94 GHz. 5G goes up to 300 GHz. Right now they use 2.5 and 5.0 because they're trying to make people get a blind association of thinking 5G "means 5 GHz". They are almost there since people seem to forget, it means 5th generation. Meanwhile everyone seems to not even care to discover the actual numbers and data.
@@ShaunVillafana its so sad, honestly. Thank you for this
@@ShaunVillafana Might want to get that tinnitus checked
Unfortunately the point of difference was not made between non-ionizing radiation "heating" effect and it's vibration effect on cells and DNA. The real danger of 5G.
Thinking that "heating" is concern of anyone who knows anything about the topic . . .is a red herring.
@@2Truth4Liberty Very well put. The major factor is not the heating but the resonance itself given that DNA is piezoelectric crystalline and the cell is spherical which would act same as the grape traping resonant frequency inside, assuming the frequency bandwidth is equal in wavelength to the diameter circumference of the cell membrane. With the DNA at the center of the cell this puts the DNA within the cell nucleus a near-impossible thing to miss.
The frequency only need to be of the resonance factor and no matter the direction "beamwaved" _(*the network company term for the 5G WiFi directional-technology beaming it's WiFi towards the device, and thus, device holder)_ and it would refocus the energy to the center of the cell, directly impacting the cell's DNA, at which point causing it to fracture.
Meanwhile the mainstream media edges their foot-in the doorway of science nuances trying to brainwash the public into thinking that "viruses are alive" and not merely DNA or RNA genetic date.
So we forget the very real factor that our own fractured DNA very well may contain the whole of many of what we call viruses and claim to come inherently from outside of us.
Which begs the question: where did the initial "hull" of the virus come from?
It must have gone through exocytosis somehow.
It would never be able to enter a cell without a membrane encasing it from somewhere and so at some point it had to have originated from within the cells and DNA of some similar being.
I don't think it's far-fetched to conclude it may have originated from within us-each.
Especially since the world health organization put that up as their first "fact check" at the beginning of the lockdown before anyone had even brought up and questioned the possibility. With DNA as piezoelectric, that says it all right there.
Yeah so how about the sidewalk mini towers every 500 feet beaming at peoples heads. Great video!
Those are quite safe!
I'm a CS degree, and I think that if we take just one device, as mobile phone, that will be "ok" in certain way. But the other technologies as Internet of Things, Always on paradigm, and web services are constantly growing, so the electromagnetic field will only grow
If humans survived for all this time with the sun blasting us, I think the fart in the wind that is human generated emf for communication will have little impact. At this point, if you were inside a swimming pool full of cell phones making active calls, the sun would still be the bigger concern.
Constant sun exposure is proven to cause skin cancer. Why does manmade radiation have an excuse just because it is less dangerous than something we already know to be dangerous?
No one:
Minecraft players in bedrwars and 1v1: 2:15
We did the calculations in my college physics class years ago. The short version is that the electromagnetic radiation the sun emits so greatly dwarfs everything else that it's not even worth worrying about.
Well that just means we could have evolved with a baseline resistance to radiation, adding more radiation to the mix doesn't mean there's less, you combine the two. Having a cup of water that's always full can still overflow if you introduce more water.
Physics major ?🤔
@@ciiNtHi444 i now realize that
@@010ChrisisCool except sunlight radiation is not harmful. And it’s negligent anyway. 1kW/m^2 is the suns output
@@jimmysyar889 okay so either the argument comparing sunlights radiation is irrelevant because its a different type, or the amount of radiation from the sun (before additional 5G radiation) is not harmful.
Is it possible for 5g electrmagnetic field could work like a tesla tower and cell phone antenas could acually power some electronics in the future? I mean if you remember those cell phones in the 90s that had led lamp as antena?
can I use a regular emf meter to check the radiation? or shoud i use rf meter..
By far, this is my favorite science/learning UA-cam channel. I always feel like a little kid learning something for the first time. James is the science teacher I wish I had in school. My take away from this video is that electric socks could possibly be more dangerous than your cell phone or a cell tower.
Science? bah
Where was the mention of vibration effects of 5G type waves on cells and DNA?
heating? Is he kidding anyone? The danger is not in heating, it is in the vibration.
This is an junk science channel if you ask me.
Does he really claim to know science? or is that just you thinking his channel is about that? I ask because this is the first video f his I have ever seen.
FYI, the EMF-390 doesn't test for the full 5G frequency range. The EMF 390 antenna can only detect upto 10GHz but 5G extends up to 100GHz.
I thought it topped out around 60ghz?
@@locklear308 it depends on the carrier and the country and I don't know that there's a hard limit on it.
@@EricPotratzM well I mean I guess it's just whatever range you can buy as a carrier
@@EricPotratzM the government makes the machines rigged sort of like what car workshops do
He was measuring in milliwatts… no real 5G meters? What?
In additional to mmwave (24-40Ghz) 5g signals are also on the lower bands as well with 4g signals (600-3000MHz).
Yet it's no gamma radiation.
@@NominePater, it's _nothing_ like gamma radiation. Gamma rays cause cancer. RF does nothing (except for heat).
It would be great to have the second part of this video, analyzing 5G Networks on the 20GHz+ frequency range. Since your EMF-390 Meter goes up to only 10 GHz, you are probably measuring a 5G network working at 2.5 GHz or below ( n41 or n71 bands ). My concern is about 5G deploys on the higher bands ( n258 @24GHz, n260 @39GHz, etc ), since on the low and mid ranges seems to be no harm.
Higher frequencies are safer. They get dissipated by air molecules and do not go thru human tissue.
@@topherkrock they do not dissipate totally because you will have no communication at all, but most important, they do not go through, but are absorbed by the first layers of the skin and cornea.
@@gerardoruiz72, but they do dissipate to the point where you'll have no communication. Otherwise, there would not be a need for more antennae.
@@gerardoruiz72, they aren't "absorbed" in the sense that you are speaking. A better word would be "stopped".
@@gerardoruiz72, you were thinking of UVC light, not RF.
I work on the towers, the RMF detectors we wear don't go off until we are hugging the front of the antennas. If you are in directly in front of them (within a foot or so), you can feel parts of your body warm up. It takes hours of exposure at that distance to it affect you and dissipates within minutes of moving away.
Things like radar and satellite microwave are what will mess you up, but for that to happen you'd REALLY have to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I had an electronics Navy instructor tell the class how a crewman climbed up and went over the fence in front of the ships rotating RADAR antenna to sterilize himself. He was cooked and died horribly. I think the Tesla death ray generates high power microwave energy.
@@solarsynapse I used to work for a satellite TV network. The 20 ft uplink dish had a fence of yellow police tape around it. The uplink engineer told us that if we got inside the zoned off area that we would get a suntan real fast...
You have to switch with your EMF-390 from All-in-mode to vertical mode. Then you can see the frequencies to verify 5G or not
The consequences of resonances and standing waves in the body caused by reflections of radio frequency radiation are also discussed by Frank Leary in: "Researching Microwaves Health Hazards", in: Electronics, February 1959, p. 49-53 (p.52)
"Because the body and its parts are conductive, resonance occurs at critical frequencies, creating standing waves. Some of the effects discovered by researchers in the cavities of the body and in the bone marrow appear to be caused by increased heating which could result from resonance. In more than one case, internal injuries from microwave radiation were undoubtedly caused by reflections at the fat-muscle or muscle-bone junctions that created standing waves near them. A number of experiments with small animals have produced partial or complete loss of control of locomotor control at comparatively low irradiance. Immediately after the end of irradiation, the effect subsided. This effect could be a result of resonance within the cranial cavity or along the spinal cord, which could create a field strong enough to compete with and extinguish the normal signals from the motor control nerves. The transmission system of the nerves could be temporarily switched off."
There is clear experimental evidence that electromagnetic fields in the range of ELF (extremely low frequency) to UHF (ultra high frequency) (10 hertz to 450 megahertz) act directly on brain tissue. A striking feature of some of these observed effects of weak radio frequency (RF) fields is their dependence on modulation frequencies in the ELF range rather than on the frequency of the carrier.
The resonant frequency of the human head is between 400 and 500 MHz while in the longitudinal axis of the body the resonant frequency and thus the highest absorption of electromagnetic waves is around 35 MHz for grounded bodies and around 70 MHz for isolated bodies. In the axes of the body from front to back and from right to left, the resonance frequency is between 135 MHz and 165 MHz. The amount of energy absorbed by the body when irradiated with a power of 10 milliwatts per square centimetre (the maximum allowed average value over 6 minutes according to the US limits for microwaves) shows in models for human and animal bodies that the energy absorption is greatly increased at resonant frequencies and in the vicinity of conductive ground surfaces or reflectors. When grounding and reflection are combined, the energy absorption is surprisingly high. The energy absorption of human models at a power density of 10 mW / cm2 predict a SAR ( specific absorption rate ) value that is 35 to 70 times higher than the value for the basal metabolic rate.
Electromagnetic fields in the environment influence behavioural, neurophysiological and chemical processes in the central nervous system of mammals. An evaluation of all possible mechanisms of influence is not possible at this stage. And the combinations of different physical parameters that can be tested obviously result in so many combinations that it was necessary, for financial reasons as well as for reasons of effective use of scientific manpower, to first investigate the effects of those electromagnetic fields that were thought to be most likely to affect the tissues of the central nervous system. (...)
A wide range of radiofrequency and microwave carrier frequencies were tested, with essentially no evidence of effects due to the carrier frequency alone, as long as the energy remained below the threshold of significant heating. But an apparent clustering of higher sensitivity (of the central nervous system) was found with amplitude modulation of the carrier at a frequency between 1 Hz and about 40 Hz. There is also evidence of influences of radiofrequency and microwave fields pulse modulated at higher frequencies between500 Hz and 1500 Hz, while an unmodulated field with an equal average energy density and the same carrier frequency had no effect. As with certain haematological and immunological effects, as well as effects on the nervous system of marine vertebrates, amplitude-dependent windows for the effects were discovered.
Where can one find the whole writing or pdf?
Interesting. Can you please summarize from this, - what you think the effects of EMF are on you body? I didn't quite catch it. Thanks! Very interesting.
So is this good or bad?
To sum it up, it depends on the amplitude.
When he said increased amplitude of 1Hz - 40Hz that means that no 1 frequency was found to harm (yet) but as with any signal the higher the amplitude or amplification of a signal meaning an over saturation of a particular frequency will raise the signal strength amplitude of that given frequency.
So, although 1 phone may not be terrible (may also not be good for mood) lets say you and 3 friends studying at a cafe and you all have laptops open, phones, tablets, smart watches and are all working on a big project, but then also consider everyone around you and all their devices. The amplitude signal strength with all that EMI/RF of different types of EMF are affecting your cells and neurons undoubtedly!
That's a HUGE dump of radiation to take on. And that sugary caffeinated beverage is also overloading everyone's exhausted pancreas that's constantly trying to combat the assault of EMF on their minds. It's a vicious cycle of deadly consumerism leading to diabetes and depression.
There's a huge market on signal blocking faraday clothing now, no shit. I'm not convinced, as I've worked in the field. But if you're concerned, it's worth looking into for partial peace of mind.
@@jakeschminky5984 look up the world radio history website, then search for the reference.
❤ THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK!
Apart from the ignorent (80%) comments it's a lovely vid!
Spot on!
very informative! please do a follow up when they release the report next year, would be great source of objective information
As you can see in this video, uranium gives you lots of clicks on your vids
I like the hum you get from the powerline towers
You sit around listening to power stations?
@@topherkrock when the normal world gets to be boring.
Well, the only thing it'll causes is eye strain, uh... A bit of wrist pain... Oh, and annoying spam calls... But that's about it, but faster speeds
both deadly levels but towers are nothin to worry about lol
Towers, phones, microwave ovens... none of them need to be feared.
We need more people like you. Your videos are so informative and educational. Every video you make is always interesting as well. Thank you so very much for what you are doing.
We already have enough people ignorant of the health damage caused by 5 G. We do not need more people like him.
@INSECT BITE *-* 5G existed before your opinion of it. I say opinion because I know genuine research doesn’t make it too far past your eyes. Chemistry is really hard, I get it. You can’t project your insecurities on others though.
@@taylor92493 I'm talking about his videos in general.
If you were my physics teacher, I'd have topped every physics test.
Maybe in a parallel universe.
I doubt it
My physics teacher was like this. Crazy smart showed us his Perfect SATs. They fired him after two years because they didn’t like his methods even though it worked. Students in his classes across the board had better grades than any other teacher. He was way more hands on and not death by memorization or repetition. We did our own little experiments and made our own hypothesis to start every day and he wouldn’t tell us what was right or wrong until we all spoke (about 6-8 groups) and discussed our findings and what we thought. I learned more from him than my entire High School career.
But so would other students as well. So that cancels out.
Yeah in parallel universe may be
I worked in the Telecommunications industry for many years. I developed stage 4 head and neck cancer at a young age. They preach the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation to the workers. I however wouldn't be surprised to see the "if you worked in the Telecom industry" commercial in the future.
You really should be sharing your experience far and wide then, because many are saying that's just not happening.
Do you smoke?
I did smoke when I was in high-school but I had quit around 2012 and didn't get sick until 2018. My doctors were adamant that the cancer wasn't from smoking though. Basically said I didn't smoke long enough for it to be from smoking. I also was drinking large amounts of alcohol so there's that to.
I feel like if there was rampant cancer in the industry, we would know about it with platforms like social media and whatnot. I followed a bunch of tower climber pages on FB and those guys would cry about anything and everything in those groups. If there was widespread issues they would be complaining about it. Also, I went through RF school and if you understand the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation you'll have you answer. You can cook with RF but it doesn't mutate the cell structure.
@@chickmagnetwampaone, that's the problem, though. Inserting carcinogens into your lungs is a gamble. It didn't matter that you quit around 2012; the carcinogens had already been put there. It's the same with UV light.
Cooking won't cause cancer, but it does burn.
@@chickmagnetwampaone Ignore Topher, he actually works for a major Telecom that's making a shitload of money off of this tech.
They give zero Fs about how it's messing with us, as investors have spent tens of $Billions on investing in this infrastructure and they want their return, at any cost
This is a dope test
On every level.
This was really interesting! Thank you for clearing out the differences between radiations :)
Even non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer, don't let this fool you. UV light is non-ionizing (it doesn't have the power to remove electrons) but can still cause skin cancer.
@@thewhinjaninja3610 oh.. right. Didn't think of that D:
@@TnZAustin There is no safe level of radiation, just lower doses (i.e. natural)
@[hehe] Are you sure about that? 🤔
@[hehe] And what's sugar got to do with radiation?
I did enjoyed it. And I did subscribed as well. Your Video CONTENT is really full of sense. Your channel deserves all the subscribers there is. Please continue to educate and inform us with your amazing effort and making a topic interesting and simpler for your viewers to understand. You're absolutely AWESOME 🤙
uTTER NONSENSE AND MISINFORMATION! Check out the EMF guy on utube if u want the truth.
You should test gadgets and apparel that say they prevent emfs. For example lambs or Aires tech
All the stuff that fools buy thinking that it makes them safe.
Just to add on top of this info, 5G uses the same exact frequencies that have been in use in radio and cell phones for a century. It is simply a new protocol for organizing the data and sharing the signal so that more data can be sent without interference between signals.
Read a little more
@@SkyPC well, enlighten me, then...
@@SkyPC, "read a little more"? All the factual information shows that "Yuuup" is correct, and that 5G is quite safe as implemented.
Actually, those frequencies didn't come into use until World War 2 and the development of radar. After the war, the UHF TV channels were first allocated and the higher ones were later reallocated to cell phone use.
@@SnootchieBootchies27, right on. It's all safe.
The EMF meter used here detects 5G network signal and RF up to 10Ghz. 5G Ultra Wideband uses the 28 and 39 GHz millimeter wavelength spectrum bands.
seems an important fact
That's an awesome emf meter! Figuring out what device its picking up
in "milli" wats, mostly is measured V/m so convert to correct measure and check he limits
. I've been sick and stuck in bed. I've been listening to videos. Sleeping with it next to my leg. I couldn't figure out why all of my veins were breaking in my leg. While both legs hurt, the leg closest to the phone hit so much I'm having trouble walking. The pain being so aweful and sick feeling, it felt more like poisoning. I felt quickened that it could be this. Thank you.for this confirmation. I'll bet thats why I haven't slept thru the night. Mo as t people haven't been for a few years now. Fatday bags are less than $10 and up. Hopefully it will help. It's for emf blocking signals and tracking for military and off grid
You didn't actually watch the video, did you? He debunks the stuff you're spewing.