1w per square meter but only in a tiny area, which means you're actually getting only a fraction of a W total, probably like 20 miliwatts. it would take a cellphone at full blast over a year to heat your body by 1 degree, IF you weren't able to dissipate heat
Sure, then you should be calling up all the carries and offering up the side of your house, preferably where your bedroom is, to be 5G nodes for all of them. You will be rich, and perfectly healthy... until you are not.
@@AaronAlso Do you have the cell phone company number where I allow them to put in cell tower in my bedroom in exchange for lots of money? If not, STFU with your FUD.
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE! PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3 UTUBE : p NODE SUMSCO VANPAT I ALSO LEARNED 5g CAN SPLIT URANIUM ATOMS HUMANS ONLY MADE OF cARBON..
This is the reason I was against the cell tower on the roof of our building, I was not afraid of the radiation, but crappy signal. It is way better when it is mounted on the opposing building:)
There's an article that will make a 5G smartphone be charge using, of course, thru 5G itself but the technology isn't coming next year or next next year. So maybe i'll buy a 5G smartphone capable of charging using its 5G in the near future, hahaha! I'll wait for that since i'm still young!
One thing I didn't hear mentioned when discussing the Geiger counter is that those clicks you heard before the sample was brought close was mostly from the natural background radiation that you are constantly exposed to every day. In my area, it's about 19 CPM which is a pretty normal average. You don't start getting into elevated danger territory until you start getting about 100 CPM sustained.
@@titanthegreat Three reasons: depending on the natural background radiation (19CPM in my area) I would expect to hear only 19 clicks every minute on average. In the brief time his phone was near the disk there may not have been any particles or rays detected. The phone was partially covering the disk which will itself block alpha and beta particles from reaching the disk (gamma would still easily pass through the phone. Finally, it may have been too far from his mic to hear the subtle one or two clicks.
4g was already proven to cause cancer It operates at 3.5ghz radiation 5g operates at microwave frequencies 90ghz to 300ghz Another thing that operates between 90 to 300ghz is the "active denial system" which can cause a burning sensation under the skin, or individual organ failure at high power
@@helpabrothawithasubisaiah5316 Sure, we might not have done all the testing for all frequencies, but that doesn't justify being too hysterical about this radiation. I've yet to see anyone explain the mechanism for how radio or microwaves at these intensities could possibly do any harm. But either way, then sure, I am positive to any research on the health effects of the frequency range to be partially used with the 5G network.
I worked in the Telecommunications industry for many years. I developed stage 4 head and neck cancer at a young age. They preach the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation to the workers. I however wouldn't be surprised to see the "if you worked in the Telecom industry" commercial in the future.
I did smoke when I was in high-school but I had quit around 2012 and didn't get sick until 2018. My doctors were adamant that the cancer wasn't from smoking though. Basically said I didn't smoke long enough for it to be from smoking. I also was drinking large amounts of alcohol so there's that to. I feel like if there was rampant cancer in the industry, we would know about it with platforms like social media and whatnot. I followed a bunch of tower climber pages on FB and those guys would cry about anything and everything in those groups. If there was widespread issues they would be complaining about it. Also, I went through RF school and if you understand the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation you'll have you answer. You can cook with RF but it doesn't mutate the cell structure.
@@chickmagnetwampaone, that's the problem, though. Inserting carcinogens into your lungs is a gamble. It didn't matter that you quit around 2012; the carcinogens had already been put there. It's the same with UV light. Cooking won't cause cancer, but it does burn.
@@chickmagnetwampaone Ignore Topher, he actually works for a major Telecom that's making a shitload of money off of this tech. They give zero Fs about how it's messing with us, as investors have spent tens of $Billions on investing in this infrastructure and they want their return, at any cost
As a qualified Radio Amateur, of over 30 years, I can assure you, your phone will never harm you, unless you drop it on your foot. The levels of RF emissions from any device, is miniscule compared to the RF coming from the Sun.
Right and isn’t the whole reason for having FCC stickers on tons of devices to say that this device does stay within the length of its radio wave, and not just sending random ass waves interfering with other devices or potentially harmful?
@Porco Porco Have you watched the video.? It is clear, Radio is NOT like Nuclear at all. Radio is NON Ionising, and harmless, whereas Nuclear is Ionising Radiation and quite deadly. Your Microwave is in a tuned steel box, AKA a Faraday Cage. In any case, any slight leakage would only burn. Its all in the Physics.
@Porco Porco My friend I think you're confused as to how radiation works. Ionising radiation is dangerous because it can mutate your DNA and cause cancer. Any other radiation can only burn and is not dangerous. Radiowaves and Microwaves are the least dangerous. The Microwave oven is only dangerous if you put something with molecules that can be affected by the waves inside it e.g Water.
This is such a little amount i would not be worried if 10x the amount would be close to me and radiation through your heart isn't a big problem as well, as long as it won't go through your brains
@@biem7091 not to mention he doesn't even tell the setting of the Geiger counter. You can make Geiger counters go crazy with the clicks just off of atmospheric radiation. It's a good trick to make people think something is very dangerous. Next would be the type of particles being emitted off the small piece of uranium. You skin, and clothes stop most subatomic particles. And this piece was inside a bag. @av 26 Anywho, I've had uranium sitting on my dresser since I was 6. That piece is about the size of my fist. Also I worked nuclear in the navy and civilian plants. I've worked right next to an operating reactor. Radiation wasn't my great at that moment, heat was. My work boots sole melts to the metal on the floor. We typically only had a 10 to 15 minute stay time, due to heat in the area.
Modern 4g towers can actually control the direction of the beam. These type of antenna used today normally only radiate in one direction. There is almost no electrical field directly under or above an antenna, as this would be wasted energy.
"One direction" is perhaps exaggeration, a 60-degree sector antenna is pretty standard, with the center somewhat lower than the horizon. 5G technologies rely heavily on beamforming to carry millimeter waves around obstacles, using multiple overlapping antennas to produce directional interference patterns. 4G systems can also use beamforming, but spatial streams can only reduce emitted power by allowing higher selectivity. Beamforming also requires an array of antennas, and as you get closer and closer to the ideal ray aimed at a user's phone, you need more and more area claimed by antennas.
@StringerNews1 You seriously need learn to read and wind your neck in. "The tower" can also mean Everything above ground level: mast, cables, cell antennae and microwave links. There IS signal from the tower near the base AS SHOWN IN THE VIDEO, it has been measured, calcated and demonstrated in Many examples, but, as I posted the bulk of radiation there is from devices that experience poor coverage and as a result radiate more than usual. So, learn to read, learn to listen and be prepared for the fact that you donk know it all. This was very very widely published in the 90's (perhaps before you were born)
I don't think the missing electrical field above and below the antenna is necessarily a feature to waste less energy. It is actually physically impossible for the antenna to send in that direction, unless there are multiple antennas pointing up, down and sideways (like on a WiFi router).
7:30 microwave is higher powered. 7:40 so 5G is higher powered. 7:16 but it can affect the water and sugar molecules in your body. 7:54 so really the only risk is causing your skin or your body to heat up a little bit. What’s higher powered?
The thing I love about this is that it’s not demeaning, patronising or anything. There are people who have concerns and all he does is present the information to better understand the technology in a productive way. As a scientist this is attitude is such a pleasant thing to witness and is sorely needed in community. No one likes intellectually abused and harassed. We need more people like this who just want to help others understand and aren’t judgmental towards others! As demonstrated in this video it isn’t hard to just view your fellow humans with respect and communicate clearly with them. Great video!
First off - science is not a field or a profession. It is a method of evaluating our physical realm, and its scope does not exceed this physical realm and that which can be directly observed. The term "scientist" itself is deceptive, because anyone calling themselves that is akin to a carpenter calling himself a table saw or a construction worker calling himself a dump truck. No, you're not a scientist - nobody is. There are only people who apply the scientific method as part of an attempt to gain a better understanding of some kind of physical phenomena...but the reasons for doing so are varied. Secondly, nobody with a significant amount of preconceived notions that are largely rooted in degenerate leftard politics can call themselves a "scientist" and expect to be taken seriously. It's well-known that RF, especially in certain frequency ranges, are harmful. The meme of ionizing radiation is just that - another unproven hoax floated along with the 1960s anti-nuclear energy propaganda campaigns. Let us guess - you also believe red meat and sugar is BAAAAAAAD for consumption, because science (even though not an iota of science supports these claims). You've already taken the idiotic position that the EMF emitted by phones and other wireless electronics is safe, and that the plebs just need to be explainerized more betterer. That's the most imbecilic position anyone could take. Do you walk around with a diaper strapped to your face?
The trouble is, it's generally the people selling measures to counteract it that are the real malicious ones, less so the people just peddling those ideas because they came from an apparently credible source
Fun fact: Radiation levels near the base of a mast can be many times higher than further away. Not because of the signal from the mast, but fom mobile devices "screaming" to find reception in what is an area of poor coverage.
The concern is effects over a very, very long period of time with consistent exposure. Which there are almost no studies on, especially in the US where there are huge amounts of money preventing such studies being done. Yes, we all know it’s nothing like actual radiation which causes harm within a short period of time, but what we don’t know is the effects of this more minor radiation over 20 years. To simply ignore the potential, with a lack of studies, is ignorant.
@@joepromedio I will say that there have been some German studies on the long term effects and they did not look too good. If you’re in the industry I would really urge you to look and try to find some of those in other countries. I think I remember reading there was a significantly increased number of people developing cancer who lived near a cell tower. The US is just too corrupt with too many lobbyist for this stuff for now
Yeah... no studies exist at all regarding long term 5G exposure. But why do people even care? The only people who think that might be cause for concern are those who really do not understand physics. Why? Because the sun exists. Nobody is concerned about dying early because the sun exists. Therefore nobody in their right mind should be concerned about piddly little 5G
I work on the towers, the RMF detectors we wear don't go off until we are hugging the front of the antennas. If you are in directly in front of them (within a foot or so), you can feel parts of your body warm up. It takes hours of exposure at that distance to it affect you and dissipates within minutes of moving away. Things like radar and satellite microwave are what will mess you up, but for that to happen you'd REALLY have to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I had an electronics Navy instructor tell the class how a crewman climbed up and went over the fence in front of the ships rotating RADAR antenna to sterilize himself. He was cooked and died horribly. I think the Tesla death ray generates high power microwave energy.
@@solarsynapse I used to work for a satellite TV network. The 20 ft uplink dish had a fence of yellow police tape around it. The uplink engineer told us that if we got inside the zoned off area that we would get a suntan real fast...
One thing you didn't test was using your cell phone near the tower. 5G directs and concentrates signal to your phone. This will significantly increase the cell tower radiation in the proximity of your phone. I'd be curious to see you testing that scenario
hes lying 5g towers are dangerous they are short wave! 5g is bad no matter where its coming from. this would be controlled opposition. wake tf up peeps!
@@irock5624 amazing way of saying " I know absolutely nothing about radiation or wave lengths, btw I never payed attention in science class because of my lack of intelligence, instead I'll just listen to my crazy mothers Facebook groups because I'm an ignorant American"
@@Test7017 really so like wouldnt it be really bad for the dude who installs them and flips them on and a standing right there next to it while it's running?
This guys channel is killing it! I remember watching his videos when he was at 30k subscribers. Now he’s everywhere. It’s guys like this that deserve our attention, not tik-tok stars getting views from eating tidepods
yup, hes an absolute madman, he made videos that I never even thought of (like being able to see magnetic waves, mirror room, the self moving fish thingy, sound illusions, simulation theory, I could list more if I have to)
@NominePater, WikiLeaks has nothing to do with our conversation. Further, that line about it is quite the pile of bullshit. Classified documents are classified for a reason. WikiLeaks can unintentionally cause seriously grave damage to our security.
Just some food for thought: the average intensity of sunlight hitting our planet all the time is around 300 W/m^2, which on this meter would have registered 300 000 (300 000 mW/m^2).
Here's some more food for thought: If there was some kind of shadowy cabal that didn't have our best interests at heart that was ready and willing to deliberately cause adverse health side effects - who's to say that the manufacturer of this meter isn't a member of said shadowy cabal?
@King Pistachion It was a conspiracy theory that Johnson and Johnson was covering up the potential adverse health effects of their baby powder right up until it wasn't. The very first sentence of this video is "Today we're going to be testing if the [signal] from your [personal communications device] is going to [lethally incapacitate you] or not". I'm all for such testing. I'm merely playing devils advocate and pointing out a potential flaw in the test.
More food the sunlight covers ir visible uv etc..... this is just the 5g frequency we are concerned about. And yes the uv portion of sunlight will damage your eyes and burn your skin...
Only thing I know about cellphone towers is the ones in rural or suburban areas that are slightly forested is that the small animal and insect population is tiny or nonexistent in the area that is within about 300 to 600 yards of the tower while the rest of the area will have your normal insect and small animal populations. Ones that are the most noticeable is I never hear cicadas in the area around the tower even if there is a large number of trees around the tower but you walk down the road a couple blocks and you hear the cicadas again.
Nature doesn’t lie but the governments do. I’m now disabled since all cell towers and other RF meters became very close to me. I didn’t think it was an issue until I did research on the dates these things were installed. That’s when I started to get sick by something no doctor I have met with can help me with. I’m not a tin hat but I don’t believe in coincidences. If anyone else has noticed this with your heath please reply to this post.
@@fulaan1 Yes I am. I’m 100% disabled and getting worse each day. I’ve been trying to move but it’s not been easy. Everybody’s playing California so the prices are going up everywhere. I basically need to get away from all the electronics in the city.
@@TwoForFlinchin1 with a cellphone with an EMF protector. Yes it does work. I had my electrician scan it with some kind of machine he uses. I also had him scan some other things in my home including my TV. The router is the one that uses a lot of power and produces a lot of bad energy. I had that moved on the other side of the house. I also sit at least 10 feet away from the TV.
In a physics class in school this is an opportunity for further teaching, (1) demonstrating the acute drop-off as the uranium sample moved only a couple of centimetres away from the Geiger counter, as can be seen in the video, and (2) talking about how one's epidermis stops things like alpha particles and ultra-violet except at extremely short ranges/high intensities, but not beta particles or gamma rays.
Good video. As an amateur radio operator I can understand people’s nervousness about RF energy. Anyone who has touched an antenna that is transmitting might receive an RF burn instantly depending on the frequency and power in the antenna. But as you said, the power diminishes immediately with even a few feet. I prefer to use my Bluetooth EarPods which is only a few milli-watts next to my head as apposed to around 1 watt from the phone itself, so roughly 1000 times lower. Should check what Bluetooth headset signal strength reading is. I know Bluetooth isn’t 5G millimeter wavelength, but it’s the same wavelength as a microwave oven. Also need to see what the signal strength from your microwave oven is…
5G in most cities will use the LTE bands as the FR2 bands would be the dumbest thing to use for cellular devices just like NB-IoT. As if our dollars aren't funding enough dumb projects imagine having to fund Verizon with tax dollars for their pet project
It is the pretty same,i have some Sony and JBL headphones and when I measure it,it shows me 6V/m =100 000 mikroW/m2 -this is max what my device can measure,so it can be even higher amount of energy;by Iphone it is the same intensity,so imagine this energy direct into your ears-next to brain…I use it only by skiing and cca after two hours of listening music i became headache .I cant imagine what it can cause by children,whos brain is developing only…
3G is going off. 5G uses all frequencies, same as 3G. LTE is most common, I don't really think that meter is going to tell exactly whats going on. The real 5G is hardly being implemented yet.
@@gregsz1ful yeah, you're pointing out one of the huge problems with nay sayers. 5g is implemented across a variety of bands. I think TMobile has them here in Denver. The stuff is insanely fast, but the signals can't even make it through the walls of my apartment. Most "5g" towers are really just a protocol upgrade from 4g. They are not the high bandwidth ultra high frequency transmitters. Those are reserved for high density areas. The lower frequency is designed for penetrating walls and long distances at the trade of bandwidth.
Also how come cell phone providers don't have EMF meter's at there location's. It would be nice to know if your phone is not making you sick. Like bad headaches, and blurry vision from blue light.🤔👍😎
@@waynef9314 There are standards by some government safety stuff. Dangers have been discussed for years. How about classrooms where all the kids have pads and phones. EMF meters are not used for detection. RF meters are. EMF is basically low frequency magnetic radiation, like an electric motor. Many of these cell tower crazies never talk about or measure the phone itself, right on your ear.
I love that you chose this topic and hope you will continue exploring it in your videos. Your personality, curiosity, and visual aporoach makes learning/exploring science easier and much more fun . Thank you!
Sorry sir, you spelled it wrong, it's abbreviation for World's Hell Organization. Btw: they include age appropriate sex ed for little children ... amongst all kind of other wrongdoings. Fun fact: They are financed and thus controlled by private investors, first of all Pill Bill.
Your cell phone WILL KILL YOU, 'cause you're going to be preoccupied looking at something on your phone, and then step into traffic, and get smacked by a very large "particle", known as a bus !
Holding that small amount of uranium near his chest insn't really that dangerous considering there are people who have to work with similar materials daily.
”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.” ~ George Carlo PhD @@Fifasher2Kcause of all the towers, aye?
Thank you for making the point of the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. This is very important to understand. The signal is stronger when you get a bit further from the tower because of the “umbrella” effect of the signal pattern from the antennas.
It's actually not that important at all to understand considering the microwaves emitted in a microwave are non-ionizing. The process for them to *become* ionizing has to do with the shield plate within the microwave which is used to filter-reflect the non-ionizing microwaves so they bounce within the chamber of the emitter until they attain the resonance factor required to pass through the filter - which is designed to be the gain of resonance of *ionizing radiation.* Which should be common sense. It's a wave. Just like sound waves, just like liquid waves, there is such thing as resonance factor. This is why when you microwave a grape it doesn't just "cook". It bursts into pure high-heated plasma. Look it up watch a video. This is due to the grape being the same size of the microwave oven's matured wavelength. This is not just a factor that happens by resonance alone. This can also happen by multiple waves collapsing upon each other of the same resonance frequencies or waves in octaves. Right now I have hundreds of 5G wifi routers around me. I can hear it. It sounds like hundreds of tambourines. These frequencies are in the similar ranges as the military ADS device which cooks skin on people in crowds at 94 GHz. 5G goes up to 300 GHz. Right now they use 2.5 and 5.0 because they're trying to make people get a blind association of thinking 5G "means 5 GHz". They are almost there since people seem to forget, it means 5th generation. Meanwhile everyone seems to not even care to discover the actual numbers and data.
Unfortunately the point of difference was not made between non-ionizing radiation "heating" effect and it's vibration effect on cells and DNA. The real danger of 5G. Thinking that "heating" is concern of anyone who knows anything about the topic . . .is a red herring.
@@2Truth4Liberty Very well put. The major factor is not the heating but the resonance itself given that DNA is piezoelectric crystalline and the cell is spherical which would act same as the grape traping resonant frequency inside, assuming the frequency bandwidth is equal in wavelength to the diameter circumference of the cell membrane. With the DNA at the center of the cell this puts the DNA within the cell nucleus a near-impossible thing to miss. The frequency only need to be of the resonance factor and no matter the direction "beamwaved" _(*the network company term for the 5G WiFi directional-technology beaming it's WiFi towards the device, and thus, device holder)_ and it would refocus the energy to the center of the cell, directly impacting the cell's DNA, at which point causing it to fracture. Meanwhile the mainstream media edges their foot-in the doorway of science nuances trying to brainwash the public into thinking that "viruses are alive" and not merely DNA or RNA genetic date. So we forget the very real factor that our own fractured DNA very well may contain the whole of many of what we call viruses and claim to come inherently from outside of us. Which begs the question: where did the initial "hull" of the virus come from? It must have gone through exocytosis somehow. It would never be able to enter a cell without a membrane encasing it from somewhere and so at some point it had to have originated from within the cells and DNA of some similar being. I don't think it's far-fetched to conclude it may have originated from within us-each. Especially since the world health organization put that up as their first "fact check" at the beginning of the lockdown before anyone had even brought up and questioned the possibility. With DNA as piezoelectric, that says it all right there.
We did the calculations in my college physics class years ago. The short version is that the electromagnetic radiation the sun emits so greatly dwarfs everything else that it's not even worth worrying about.
Well that just means we could have evolved with a baseline resistance to radiation, adding more radiation to the mix doesn't mean there's less, you combine the two. Having a cup of water that's always full can still overflow if you introduce more water.
@@jimmysyar889 okay so either the argument comparing sunlights radiation is irrelevant because its a different type, or the amount of radiation from the sun (before additional 5G radiation) is not harmful.
naw, mostly just triggers the bioweapon in the death shots to genocide half the world when they send the signal after they get more people to take their mad science shot.. Wow, i wish that was as crazy as it sounds...
My physics teacher was like this. Crazy smart showed us his Perfect SATs. They fired him after two years because they didn’t like his methods even though it worked. Students in his classes across the board had better grades than any other teacher. He was way more hands on and not death by memorization or repetition. We did our own little experiments and made our own hypothesis to start every day and he wouldn’t tell us what was right or wrong until we all spoke (about 6-8 groups) and discussed our findings and what we thought. I learned more from him than my entire High School career.
@The Government yeah. The school in my area hides radiation making 5 G and it literaly forced people to wear masks ONLY RIGHT AFTER school started just so they WOUDNT KNOW THEY NEEDED MASKS! *EVIL*
By far, this is my favorite science/learning UA-cam channel. I always feel like a little kid learning something for the first time. James is the science teacher I wish I had in school. My take away from this video is that electric socks could possibly be more dangerous than your cell phone or a cell tower.
Science? bah Where was the mention of vibration effects of 5G type waves on cells and DNA? heating? Is he kidding anyone? The danger is not in heating, it is in the vibration. This is an junk science channel if you ask me. Does he really claim to know science? or is that just you thinking his channel is about that? I ask because this is the first video f his I have ever seen.
What you said the phone guys are testing the damage of cell phone radiation now and they're saying it's safe. The tobacco guys said the same thing with cigarettes. How long did it take before we found out that it was not safe to smoke? Do you not think the phone guys might lie like the tobacco guys? How much damage is going to be done by then?
very true. Plus the WHO itself is a crime organization funded by the 'elites' like Gates to propagandize whatever serves their own agenda. Never believe these ppl and organizations.
@@topherkrock I know well...u clearly havnt done enough research. Checkout the EMF guy utube, Nick Penealt, and Loyd Burrell. Also, did u hear about the court case in Italy...where a man won the case against mobile phone company for it giving him cancer?
They call it COVID-19. Do your research on the Vodafone executive who exposes the scam! The pandemic is a coverup for the rollout of the deadly technology. Billions will die worldwide as the towers go up, and the "internet of things" take over.
Sorry sir, you spelled it wrong, it's abbreviation for World's Hell Organization. Btw: they include age appropriate sex ed for little children ... amongst all kind of other wrongdoings. Fun fact: They are financed and thus controlled by private investors, first of all Pill Bill.
@@fish_speckle6936 With the way some people are commenting here, some might actually think he is simply because he was messing with the oh so EVIL 5G!!1111!! 😱😱😱
@@pavel9652 No, we will not. Their fear from all of the conspiracies and unrelated facts will push them underground or they will stay in their mama's basement. :D
The lesser signal under the cell tower is from angle of radiation from the antennas . Most of the signal is being transmitted for range ,so the small amount is because of this angle.
Good report, brother! I worked in testing RF systems independently for 15 years and you're spot on. I had and still have no financial stake in these technologies. I agree we need to study human effects, but alarmists saying there are hundreds of studies showing the harmful effects of 5G is just not true.
Unrelated but interesting fact about radiation: Till today, Marie Curie’s office chair and doorknob are 10 times more radioactive than background radiation. 🤯
The most ironic thing is the ad at the start of this video was talking about how we are experiencing, this isn’t an exaggeration of what they said, “100,000,000,000,000x” more radiation from all the WiFi in our homes
No, good theory. But its something alot more simple. There is somthing called the "blanketing effect". It basically just goes over you, due to it being so high up in the air
@@GRDL. Except that he was using a signal strength meter and not an interfered receiver. Radio waves in the near field are also not so fully formed until they are in the far field, but admit I do not know how this comes into play on all frequencies and antenna types.
He said it can effect the water in us. We are 70% water seems like a pretty big concern. He tried to make a debunk video but this still makes 5G look bad to me
I'm seeing a lot of ridiculousness when it comes to 5G, or the knowledge of microwaves. To understand _why_ *5G won't hurt you,* you need to look into the following: *What do we know about light:* 1. Light can be used to transmit information. 2. Light creates heat. 3. Light is perceived by our eyes. 4. When "concentrated", light can cut and burn things. *Does this make light dangerous?* No. Most light is safe to use due to the low power level that it designed for. That's also true of the *lower frequency EMF* that we use for communications.
Microwaves do NOT 'leak' from microwaves. Microwaves cannot escape a microwave oven. The grill on the front prevents energy escaping because the grill holes are less than the actual wavelength of microwaves. in short, you're 100% safe.
Some other considerations: 1. What is the penetration depth of the 5g radiation? Test with a 1cm thick meat piece between phone and the meter. 2. How electromagnetic waves effect neurotransmission (other than heating), as it's mainly electrochemical? 3. How 5G compares with 4G? (Relevant to places where 5g is still being implemented) What I expect is, the amount of radiation that actually reaches out brain is very low. I guess, the electromagnetic effect on neurotransmission is still under research and there's no clear answer.
@AileDiabloI agree with you, it's odd to think in terms of humble sensibilitynow days. We live fast and hard because we have to. We trust that our delicious hamburger, fries and milkshakes is all goodness. As we race off to the fill up the gas tank and buy some bottled water and a coke.( I do none of that, I'm a tree hugging florist) Why does everyone live this way? Humans can be programmed and conditioned, so we are. We are not all the same. Some are more prideful and competitive. Some are kind and conscientious. Others are psychotic and narcissistic. You think your powerful in your purchasing power so any one suggesting you're foolish, is upsetting even offensive to most. Understandable. But you are foolish and arrogant and stupid. And conditioned, influenced and manipulated. No humility or sensibility, just a vast sea of dumbed down Americans who will jump at anyone's throat should a reasonable thought be presented to them. That's partially due to the fact that 80% are magnesium deficient and have no chill. All I see is road rage and super market flare ups. Stop getting so offended. It's shows that you're not well. Most everything is designed for ease not health. And most buy into it. We get sicker they get richer that includes anything medication related, hospitals & most politicians. It is all about the money and playing on pride and ignorance.
It's really nice to finally see the principles of radiation, as it relates to our phones, explained for the average person. I do wish basic radiation protection would have been covered as well, but you covered what was most important, considering 5G isn't ionizing radiation. Well done! For those that are curious - Time, distance, and shielding are the three keys to reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. Reduce time of exposure, increase distance from the source, and shield the most sensitive anatomy.
Dr Devra Davis, epidemiologist, ”We’re seeing tumours in the hearing nerve, we’re seeing tumours on the cheek, we’re seeing tumours in the brain right around the area, and we’re seeing tumours on the side of the head where people most often hold their ‘phone. … this is a very, very serious problem and we had better get serious about addressing it.” Dr Jack Kruse, neurosurgeon and EMF effects researcher: ”5G is going to be the biggest assault on the human race ever seen…. It’s amazing to me, every day, how much I learn about what engineers are doing to electromagnetic waves to bring 5G to obedient idiots who want to watch Netflix faster. It just is shocking what they’re doing.” Dr David Carpenter, ”The movement to higher frequencies involves higher energies and therefore we’re concerned that it’s going to result in greater health hazards to human than our current technology, which already we’re showing is associated with increases in certain kinds of cancer, in certain levels of effects in the nervous system.” Kevin Mottus, ”5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home.” (Mottus says that they will emit frequencies between 24 - 90GHz, going much higher than I indicated in my previous emails.) ”We are literally microwave radiating our population and we’re wondering why there’s so much cancer and chronic illness. ..We already know the lower frequencies cause cancer and neurological problems. We expect this to be much worse, much quicker. We are literally experimenting with people’s lives. .. We need to start pushing back and stop allowing them to use us literally like rats in an experiment. … 56 billion dollars to roll out 5G (in the US), zero money to look at the health effects. That should alarm people.” The industry on 5G: Tom Wheeler, (then) FCC Chair and former senior lobbyist CTIA, ”Unlike some countries, we do not believe that we should spend the next couple of years studying what 5G should be or how it should operate The future has a way of inventing itself. Turning innovators loose is far preferable to expecting committees and regulators to define the future. We won’t wait for standards. … Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity… and that’s damned important.” Dr Paul Heroux, ”As Tom Wheeler from the FCC says, it’s a lot better to let these innovators loose and fill the surface of the earth six metres and deeper with microprocessors thereby slaughtering the human race out of oblivion than to risk losing a profit.” Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied) Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe,’‘Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.” Dr Devra Davis, ‘After all, I reasoned, cell phones must be safe. Some of those complaining about health problems had the intense passion about the matter that one tends to dismiss as not credible. If there were really any serious problems, I reasoned, the governments of the world would not blithely underwrite the global spread of this technology. Having spent the past six years learning what some have known for four decades, I now understand I was mistaken.’ Camilla Rees, ‘’This is about saying ”no” to EMF pollution and to the many forms of corruption that are driving it in media, government, universities, associations and the false front non-profits that have official sounding names of good but are actually fronts for industry. There are many aspects of deception and deflection and actions not aligned with the greater good built into this issue.’’ George Carlo PhD, ”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.” Joel M Moskowitz PhD,: ‘‘We were sort of caught in a difficult place because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been premarket testing, cell phones would never have made it into the market place.”
Exactly: the improcements aren't in the frequency but in the modulation method. Plus the only really dangerous frequency under the line of ionizating frequency, is 2.4ghz, being the natural resonating frequencybof water and the same used in microwave ovens. Still until you emit hundreds of watts, it's basically harmless.
this is incorrect. 5G specifically doesn't share space with 4G. It can't. As close as they've gotten is to get coexistence, but 4 and 5 G can't run simultaneously like bluetooth/Wifi and the whole BT/WiFi coexistence problem was a BITCH to solve because we were stuck in 2.4GHz. Both of you people are spreading unscientific disinformation. I don't think you'd understand the actual IEEE standards documents, or I would "prove" it. But anyone who is trying to buy an unlocked 5G phone from Amazon better do their homework on spectrum distribution or you're going to be more disappointed than the 4G rollout (I worked on the first gen 4G tech development and deployments as well as the first 60GHz/mm wave WiGig preliminary technologies that eventually became 5G). Here's an excerpt from the THOUSANDS of articles on this subject. What you need to know about 5G frequencies At its highest speeds, 5G should be able to reach as much as about 2 gigabits per second (Gbps) - two orders of magnitude faster than LTE, which tops out around 35 megabits per second (Mbps). To get that speed, 5G networks rely on much higher operating frequencies than existing cellular networks, reaching into what is called the millimeter wave band. But because high frequencies have shorter range than lower frequencies, 5G uses a mix of network frequency bands, generally classified as high, medium, and low. Here is an overview of these frequency bands: Low-band 5G operates between 600-850 MHz. This is similar to what 4G networks currently use and is only moderately faster than 4G, between 50-250 Mbps offering similar coverage areas for each cell tower. Not all cities and regional operators are deploying low-band 5G towers; some are opting to start with mid-band towers. Even so, it's possible for a 5G device to connect to a low-band 5G network and achieve speeds similar to 4G/LTE. Mid-band 5G operates in the 2.5-3.7 GHz range and delivers speeds between 100-900 Mbps. While offering less range per cell tower, this type of 5G is going to be the most common implementation of 5G networks for many years to come. It's a reasonable compromise between network speed and range in both medium-density urban areas and less dense rural regions. High-band 5G is the band that is most commonly associated with 5G. Operating at 25-39 GHz, this is known as "millimeter wave" spectrum and delivers gigabit speeds (currently tested as high as 3 Gbps). The tradeoff is that millimeter wave transmitters have very limited range and require the deployment of many small transmitters, so it's only viable in urban areas where transmitters can be near closely spaced homes and buildings.
5G inside your house actually counts on multipath signal reflections to get its super high speed and penetration around corners/up stairs. that was the crux of WiGig at 60GHz - worked brilliantly well but at stupid short distances (this is about 2005-2006), once we figured out that we could use all these reflections inside the house as sort of aggregate passive repeaters it was short order to get it throughout the house unless a door was closed upstairs. Intel was gonna use that to try to scale WiFi technology, but as Metro-Fi so aptly proved, WiFi doesn't scale and THAT'S why it's not on tower base stations. There are still free +7db 2.4 GHz antennas all over Portland Oregon if you want to climb up the streetlights and take them.
You forgot to explain the penetration depth or the skin effect. with that power and that wave length there is no possibility for those waves to penetrate in your organs and do any damage. Additionally 5G signal is very weak in penetrating, for this reason you ned lot of hot spots. As always amazing video!
@@mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 The problem is that there are so many studies that clearly show the dangers and effects of EMF and non-ionizing radiaton on human health, but these studies are ignored and the consequence is that there is an increase of tin foilers and misinformation. The European Parliament released a paper "Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health" last year. You might wanna read what their researchers had to say? And do me a favor read it if you want, but don't tell me that's too much text. "Non-ionising radiation, which includes radiation from mobile phones and 5G, is perceived as harmless in general, due to its lack of potency. However, some of the above-mentioned scientists point out that, in the particular case of 5G, the issue is not the potency, but the pulse,15 the frequency to which the whole population will be exposed due to the dense network of antennas and the estimated billions of simultaneous connections. As 5G employs a very high level of pulsations, the idea behind 5G is to use higher frequencies, which allows such high levels of pulsation, in order to carry very large amounts of information per second. Studies show that pulsed EMF are in most cases more biologically active and therefore more dangerous than non-pulsed EMF. Every single wireless communication device communicates at least partially via pulsations, and the smarter the device, the more pulsations. Consequently, even though 5G can be weak in terms of power, its constant abnormal pulse radiation can have an effect. Along with the mode and duration of exposures, characteristics of the 5G signal such as pulsing seem to increase the biologic and health impacts of exposure, including DNA damage, which is considered to be a cause of cancer. DNA damage is also linked to reproductive decline and neurodegenerative diseases. "A 2016 review of scientific articles, covering experimental data on the oxidative effects of lowintensity radiofrequency radiation in living cells, finds that, among 100 currently available peerreviewed studies (18 in vitro studies, 73 studies in animals, 3 studies in plants and 6 studies in humans), '... dealing with oxidative effects of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation, in general, 93 confirmed that radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative effects in biological systems'. More precisely, in 58 studies of laboratory rats, 54 show positive results, and 4 of 6 studies in humans were positive. In addition, 17 of the 18 of the in vitro studies were positive, including two on human spermatozoa and two on human blood cells. According to the authors, 'The analysis of modern data on biological effects of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation (RFR) leads to a firm conclusion that this physical agent is a powerful oxidative stressor for living cells'. A 2018 study carried out on animals, showed that electromagnetic radiation emitted by wifi networks can lead to hyperglycaemia, increased oxidative stress and impaired insulin secretion in rat pancreatic islets. A method of creating diabetes (which can lead to kidney deficiency in the long term) in laboratory rats is to expose them, even briefly, to 2.4 GHz." Source: European Parliament in a paper "Effects of 5G wireless communication and human health"
But long wavelengths are better penetrating than short wavelengths, aren't they? I mean that's the reason why microwaves work and they are operating at the same frequency as 5G, according to the schematic in this video. Of course microwaves use rediculously amounts of power, but still... the radiation should penetrate, shouldn't it?
it's not about the penetrating power, it is about ionizing energy. because ultraviolet light have high frequency they have high energy that exceeds the ionization energy of the atoms in the molecules of our dna. microwave in the other hand produces heat. if you put uv light in your left hand and put your right hand in a microwave, you would get a burn in your right hand and mutations in the left
We need more people like you. Your videos are so informative and educational. Every video you make is always interesting as well. Thank you so very much for what you are doing.
@INSECT BITE *-* 5G existed before your opinion of it. I say opinion because I know genuine research doesn’t make it too far past your eyes. Chemistry is really hard, I get it. You can’t project your insecurities on others though.
I work exclusively on MMWave 5G and the only adverse effects I’ve experienced is fatigue from working my ass off building the stuff 12-16 hrs a day. People freak out over shit they don’t have a clue about.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo Most of the particular western country where I live doesn't have any 5G! It would be truly astonishing if mortality has increased by 25% due to 5G.
@@xaravien nothings wrong but i don't get unlimited net like others atleast with slow speed i should get unlimited net but i only get 2gb per day for 600 INR/3 months so i dont care abt speed but i want interneetttt
@@TheTubejunky Environmental health trust has been debunked and called alarmist for spreading misinformation about 4G and 5G. That's not scientific research.
The majorpart of 5G antennas are "active", so, to test the real radiation near antenna, you should put the radiation-meter between your phone and the antenna.
The phone vs Sennheiser test makes perfect sense. The 5G network protocol employs many different bands at once to find the best connection, whereas the mic transmitter only works on one band at a time, selectable through the RF menu on the device. Interesting that almost no EMF was detected from the phone or router. Does your meter read all three frequencies at once, or do you have to select which set your measuring? i.e, turn a knob from RF to EMF?
That meter reads all of it at once but you can switch it to focus on a certain one. I have the same meter and it surprisingly does not come up with much EMF anywhere except when I'm near power lines or an electrical field.
Thank you so much for showing other regular devices like you did at 5:34. As an electrical worker who went through some relatively rigorous electrical math schooling, it pains me so badly when I read about people who have zero understanding of how electricity or magnetism, or radiation actually works. This video is like salve on a wound.
As an electronic tech myself, I understand your point. I also have suffered from the other side of the equation. When my health failed I discovered we also have metal parts that react to electricity, magnetism, and radiation. A healthy person has 77 different essential minerals in their body. Some like calcium are metals. They make nice antennas for all frequencies; and when they're engaged such, they aren't supporting the body anymore in that time of exposure. Research lifespan of radar operators
Dr Martin Pall, “You do not put out EMFs without doing safety testing. It is an atrocity to do that.” Dr Magda Havas: ”If it was a real problem I would know, if it was a real problem the government would protect us, how come I’m not hearing about this? These are all things I’ve heard when I’m giving seminars. They say, ‘oh, yeah? If this was really a problem they’d have told us’. I am they. I am a legitimate scientist and I am telling you.” Dr Devra Davis, epidemiologist, ”We’re seeing tumours in the hearing nerve, we’re seeing tumours on the cheek, we’re seeing tumours in the brain right around the area, and we’re seeing tumours on the side of the head where people most often hold their ‘phone. … this is a very, very serious problem and we had better get serious about addressing it.” Dr Jack Kruse, neurosurgeon and EMF effects researcher: ”5G is going to be the biggest assault on the human race ever seen…. It’s amazing to me, every day, how much I learn about what engineers are doing to electromagnetic waves to bring 5G to obedient idiots who want to watch Netflix faster. It just is shocking what they’re doing.” Dr David Carpenter, ”The movement to higher frequencies involves higher energies and therefore we’re concerned that it’s going to result in greater health hazards to human than our current technology, which already we’re showing is associated with increases in certain kinds of cancer, in certain levels of effects in the nervous system.” Kevin Mottus, ”5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home.” (Mottus says that they will emit frequencies between 24 - 90GHz, going much higher than I indicated in my previous emails.) ”We are literally microwave radiating our population and we’re wondering why there’s so much cancer and chronic illness. ..We already know the lower frequencies cause cancer and neurological problems. We expect this to be much worse, much quicker. We are literally experimenting with people’s lives. .. We need to start pushing back and stop allowing them to use us literally like rats in an experiment. … 56 billion dollars to roll out 5G (in the US), zero money to look at the health effects. That should alarm people.” The industry on 5G: Tom Wheeler, (then) FCC Chair and former senior lobbyist CTIA, ”Unlike some countries, we do not believe that we should spend the next couple of years studying what 5G should be or how it should operate The future has a way of inventing itself. Turning innovators loose is far preferable to expecting committees and regulators to define the future. We won’t wait for standards. … Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity… and that’s damned important.” Dr Paul Heroux, ”As Tom Wheeler from the FCC says, it’s a lot better to let these innovators loose and fill the surface of the earth six metres and deeper with microprocessors thereby slaughtering the human race out of oblivion than to risk losing a profit.” Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied) Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe,’‘Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.” Dr Devra Davis, ‘After all, I reasoned, cell phones must be safe. Some of those complaining about health problems had the intense passion about the matter that one tends to dismiss as not credible. If there were really any serious problems, I reasoned, the governments of the world would not blithely underwrite the global spread of this technology. Having spent the past six years learning what some have known for four decades, I now understand I was mistaken.’ Camilla Rees, ‘’This is about saying ”no” to EMF pollution and to the many forms of corruption that are driving it in media, government, universities, associations and the false front non-profits that have official sounding names of good but are actually fronts for industry. There are many aspects of deception and deflection and actions not aligned with the greater good built into this issue.’’ George Carlo PhD, ”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.” Joel M Moskowitz PhD,: ‘‘We were sort of caught in a difficult place because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been premarket testing, cell phones would never have made it into the market place.”
The amount of radiation is not as much of a thing than the wavelength of it and its resonance with molecules in your body. Radiation is "safe" when it passes through your body without resonating with anything. 5G is NOT safe because it affects the body. Not sure what "math" you talk about but that math does seem to make you some science guru feeding us with a false sense of safety and security. I bet you would go into a mictowave and cook yoursrlf for a minute if your math and the WHO would tell you so. Some healthy common sense is priceless, eorth more than any indoctrination....eeehm sorry, I meant education. ;)
@@jannieschluter9670 As someone who has failed highschool, I agree with you. Sorry to interrupt with this stupid comment, but I couldnt help myself from commenting because your answer seems pretty reasonable.
Even non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer, don't let this fool you. UV light is non-ionizing (it doesn't have the power to remove electrons) but can still cause skin cancer.
Here in Australia my Provider uses the same bands for 5G as 4G. The bands we use are 1.8GHz, 2.3GHz, 2.6GHz and 3.4GHz. Indoor coverage is rather 1.8GHz or 2.6GHz bands here in Australia.
My hearing aid with the telephone switch “on” can easily pick up electromagnetic sounds from 5G towers, power lines and Smart meters on electrical circuit panels. It’s a strong electrical humming buzz sound. My hearing aid doesn’t pick up any other electromagnetic fields like the earth or electrical outlets but these three powerful sources.
@@DrummerRF Also I hear a humming sound but when I get away from my apt it goes away or even outside.Also I down a emf reader before and the entire air around here is saturated with emf
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE! PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3 UTUBE : p NODE SUMSCO VANPAT
He keeps it polite... I guess because he wants to actually persuade them that 5G is harmless, and calling people idiots has a way of making them stop listening to you
@@jp9707 I wish more people had this attitude instead of having the intention of making the person that believes the conspiracy theory look like an idiot and ridiculing them, which only makes the person less likely to listen.
@@slothy387pooh6 not exactly 5g related but… what the science says and what the package says and what the phone does are all three dif things. but here’s something from us small brained skeptical types Picked up by several high-profile sites, a new report from RF Exposure Lab claims to shoot down safety reports from the FCC about the iPhone 11 Pro. Its results state Apple's hugely popular smartphone emits more than double the legal limit for RF radiation (3.8 watts per kilogram versus the 1.6W/kg limit.)
”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.” ~ George Carlo PhD _"tophy"_ is a paid liar & or an idgit.
I remember when 64KB RAM was good enough, I also remember when 1GB was huge storage, O also remember when 2G came out and was blazing fast at 300Kbps. There's no such thing as fast enough as technology is constantly evolving. 3G used to be fast enough back then and 4G is fast enough for now but 5G once it's available in many places will open new experiences for people around the world. Downloading a movie in mere seconds is something good. Because it means teams can also work remotely and not worry about sharing data because they don't have to wait for downloads of large files.
"In this video we will test if 5G is dangerous"
"So here's a bit of URANIUM"
You have my attention sir
I'd be more impressed if he had plutonium. 😂
Let's try splitting one of the atoms
Next episode : convert steal in gold .
@@scaricraft3995 *steel
@@deepakjain7259 *lead
1w per square meter but only in a tiny area, which means you're actually getting only a fraction of a W total, probably like 20 miliwatts. it would take a cellphone at full blast over a year to heat your body by 1 degree, IF you weren't able to dissipate heat
Sounds like you're making assumptions, nothing more.
Sure, then you should be calling up all the carries and offering up the side of your house, preferably where your bedroom is, to be 5G nodes for all of them. You will be rich, and perfectly healthy... until you are not.
@@AaronAlso i'd love to hear YOUR reasoning. except i already know where it came from so yeah don't bother.
@@AaronAlso Do you have the cell phone company number where I allow them to put in cell tower in my bedroom in exchange for lots of money? If not, STFU with your FUD.
It is one watt to your eye or brain tissue, and I'm not very worried about my toes actually
imagine being click-baited to learn, every single one of his video thumbnail is like this. I'm not even mad, this is amazing
"lot of click"
Pretty much sums up his videos. 10/10 would click again
All propaganda & bs narrative.
Hey bots, what's Cambridge Analytica style farms paying these days? Better then zionists?
Cell phones are the worst disease for a human being🤡😳🤡😳
@@jont2228, no, they aren't.
In India there are thousand of cell towers on public residential buildings
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE!
PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3
UTUBE : p NODE
SUMSCO VANPAT
I ALSO LEARNED 5g CAN SPLIT URANIUM ATOMS HUMANS ONLY MADE OF cARBON..
That's definitely not giving people shortness of breath 😀
I predict this will be one of your most watched videos ever.
EDIT: Unless the UA-cam algorithm blocks it
here before 100k views
I was here too yolo
Wait till the ignorant Karen's find it.
Along for the ride!
I was here - 7th august
This is the reason I was against the cell tower on the roof of our building, I was not afraid of the radiation, but crappy signal. It is way better when it is mounted on the opposing building:)
69th like
He did say they are not dangerous but a phone gives off more than the towers
I agree, not in my backyard, in this case "not in my roof top".
@@voodoochile7581 Right - a tiny end user cellphone gives off more then a tower serving thousands xD
@@hernerweisenberg7052 👍👌👍
idk if 5g is killing me but it's definitely killing my phone battery
There's an article that will make a 5G smartphone be charge using, of course, thru 5G itself but the technology isn't coming next year or next next year. So maybe i'll buy a 5G smartphone capable of charging using its 5G in the near future, hahaha! I'll wait for that since i'm still young!
@@KokoJeuru bruhh just imagine the energy lost due to distance
@@crystal_royal3405 They'd have to intensify the waves, which would suck. Wifi and 5g already affect meteorology.
So does android get better mobile data signal then iphone ?
@@handlebendover do you really need it tho
One thing I didn't hear mentioned when discussing the Geiger counter is that those clicks you heard before the sample was brought close was mostly from the natural background radiation that you are constantly exposed to every day.
In my area, it's about 19 CPM which is a pretty normal average. You don't start getting into elevated danger territory until you start getting about 100 CPM sustained.
He says that.
cpm is not a standard unit. Depending on the counter you are using you can get very different cpm backgrounds and sensitivities.
Why did all the ionized radio stop when his phone was close? No clicks.
@@titanthegreat Three reasons: depending on the natural background radiation (19CPM in my area) I would expect to hear only 19 clicks every minute on average. In the brief time his phone was near the disk there may not have been any particles or rays detected. The phone was partially covering the disk which will itself block alpha and beta particles from reaching the disk (gamma would still easily pass through the phone. Finally, it may have been too far from his mic to hear the subtle one or two clicks.
Yeah every sunny day that's 1 year dose of radiation per day if you get sunburned 😂
I was expecting more conspiracy comments than this. True testament to the quality of your video brother.
4g was already proven to cause cancer
It operates at 3.5ghz radiation
5g operates at microwave frequencies
90ghz to 300ghz
Another thing that operates between 90 to 300ghz is the "active denial system" which can cause a burning sensation under the skin, or individual organ failure at high power
@@ChaosBW i can't speak
@@ChaosBW they are evil man, blocking all things i say that are 100% based in logic
@@ChaosBW wrong
@@helpabrothawithasubisaiah5316 Sure, we might not have done all the testing for all frequencies, but that doesn't justify being too hysterical about this radiation. I've yet to see anyone explain the mechanism for how radio or microwaves at these intensities could possibly do any harm. But either way, then sure, I am positive to any research on the health effects of the frequency range to be partially used with the 5G network.
You know what’s more dangerous than 5G? Standing in the middle of the road measuring 5G.
The side walkway path he is standing on: 👀
HA HA HA
😂👏👏👏👏
Isn't holding the uranium so close dangerous?
Hmm
"This ore can break DNA and cause cancer"
Also him: *bring that ore next to his heart 16 sec straight*
Relax .
@Hedwig Quan I know u probably know this but it’s incredibly short time with a low dose so it’s probably less than half an x-ray so it’s not to bad
I wouldn't be surprised if he just had it in his pocket all day
The radiation from the uranium ore is still fairly weak
The uranium is stable.
I worked in the Telecommunications industry for many years. I developed stage 4 head and neck cancer at a young age. They preach the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation to the workers. I however wouldn't be surprised to see the "if you worked in the Telecom industry" commercial in the future.
You really should be sharing your experience far and wide then, because many are saying that's just not happening.
Do you smoke?
I did smoke when I was in high-school but I had quit around 2012 and didn't get sick until 2018. My doctors were adamant that the cancer wasn't from smoking though. Basically said I didn't smoke long enough for it to be from smoking. I also was drinking large amounts of alcohol so there's that to.
I feel like if there was rampant cancer in the industry, we would know about it with platforms like social media and whatnot. I followed a bunch of tower climber pages on FB and those guys would cry about anything and everything in those groups. If there was widespread issues they would be complaining about it. Also, I went through RF school and if you understand the difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation you'll have you answer. You can cook with RF but it doesn't mutate the cell structure.
@@chickmagnetwampaone, that's the problem, though. Inserting carcinogens into your lungs is a gamble. It didn't matter that you quit around 2012; the carcinogens had already been put there. It's the same with UV light.
Cooking won't cause cancer, but it does burn.
@@chickmagnetwampaone Ignore Topher, he actually works for a major Telecom that's making a shitload of money off of this tech.
They give zero Fs about how it's messing with us, as investors have spent tens of $Billions on investing in this infrastructure and they want their return, at any cost
As a qualified Radio Amateur, of over 30 years, I can assure you, your phone will never harm you, unless you drop it on your foot.
The levels of RF emissions from any device, is miniscule compared to the RF coming from the Sun.
Right and isn’t the whole reason for having FCC stickers on tons of devices to say that this device does stay within the length of its radio wave, and not just sending random ass waves interfering with other devices or potentially harmful?
@Porco Porco Radio radiation is not ionizing. You maybe should watch that video.
@Porco Porco Have you watched the video.?
It is clear, Radio is NOT like Nuclear at all. Radio is NON Ionising, and harmless, whereas Nuclear is Ionising Radiation and quite deadly.
Your Microwave is in a tuned steel box, AKA a Faraday Cage. In any case, any slight leakage would only burn.
Its all in the Physics.
Arthur Firstenberg would disagree.
@Porco Porco My friend I think you're confused as to how radiation works. Ionising radiation is dangerous because it can mutate your DNA and cause cancer. Any other radiation can only burn and is not dangerous. Radiowaves and Microwaves are the least dangerous. The Microwave oven is only dangerous if you put something with molecules that can be affected by the waves inside it e.g Water.
"So, you can hear a lot of 'clicks' when i bring this ore close"
My brain the entire clip: WHY ARE YOU BRINGING IT CLOSE TO YOUR HEART BRUH
LOL I thought the same thing. Like, is that a good idea my dude?
This is such a little amount i would not be worried if 10x the amount would be close to me and radiation through your heart isn't a big problem as well, as long as it won't go through your brains
@@biem7091 you have zero humor
@@deplorableredneck4.02 wdym
@@biem7091 not to mention he doesn't even tell the setting of the Geiger counter.
You can make Geiger counters go crazy with the clicks just off of atmospheric radiation.
It's a good trick to make people think something is very dangerous.
Next would be the type of particles being emitted off the small piece of uranium. You skin, and clothes stop most subatomic particles. And this piece was inside a bag.
@av 26 Anywho, I've had uranium sitting on my dresser since I was 6. That piece is about the size of my fist. Also I worked nuclear in the navy and civilian plants. I've worked right next to an operating reactor. Radiation wasn't my great at that moment, heat was. My work boots sole melts to the metal on the floor. We typically only had a 10 to 15 minute stay time, due to heat in the area.
Modern 4g towers can actually control the direction of the beam. These type of antenna used today normally only radiate in one direction. There is almost no electrical field directly under or above an antenna, as this would be wasted energy.
"One direction" is perhaps exaggeration, a 60-degree sector antenna is pretty standard, with the center somewhat lower than the horizon.
5G technologies rely heavily on beamforming to carry millimeter waves around obstacles, using multiple overlapping antennas to produce directional interference patterns. 4G systems can also use beamforming, but spatial streams can only reduce emitted power by allowing higher selectivity. Beamforming also requires an array of antennas, and as you get closer and closer to the ideal ray aimed at a user's phone, you need more and more area claimed by antennas.
Check out keysight's "5g engineering is amazing" video if you want to learn more.
There isn't much signal from the tower, but devices in that area can radiate more due to poor coverage.
@StringerNews1 You seriously need learn to read and wind your neck in. "The tower" can also mean Everything above ground level: mast, cables, cell antennae and microwave links.
There IS signal from the tower near the base AS SHOWN IN THE VIDEO, it has been measured, calcated and demonstrated in Many examples, but, as I posted the bulk of radiation there is from devices that experience poor coverage and as a result radiate more than usual.
So, learn to read, learn to listen and be prepared for the fact that you donk know it all.
This was very very widely published in the 90's (perhaps before you were born)
I don't think the missing electrical field above and below the antenna is necessarily a feature to waste less energy. It is actually physically impossible for the antenna to send in that direction, unless there are multiple antennas pointing up, down and sideways (like on a WiFi router).
7:30 microwave is higher powered.
7:40 so 5G is higher powered.
7:16 but it can affect the water and sugar molecules in your body.
7:54 so really the only risk is causing your skin or your body to heat up a little bit.
What’s higher powered?
This guy is a Bs teller
5g is killing us
Its unravelling dna
Look it up devra devis
@@gandalf7262, Davis is a fraud. 5G is safe. Calm TF down.
The thing I love about this is that it’s not demeaning, patronising or anything. There are people who have concerns and all he does is present the information to better understand the technology in a productive way. As a scientist this is attitude is such a pleasant thing to witness and is sorely needed in community. No one likes intellectually abused and harassed.
We need more people like this who just want to help others understand and aren’t judgmental towards others! As demonstrated in this video it isn’t hard to just view your fellow humans with respect and communicate clearly with them.
Great video!
You dont have a long therm experiment to assume that there is any hazards on that technology
First off - science is not a field or a profession. It is a method of evaluating our physical realm, and its scope does not exceed this physical realm and that which can be directly observed. The term "scientist" itself is deceptive, because anyone calling themselves that is akin to a carpenter calling himself a table saw or a construction worker calling himself a dump truck. No, you're not a scientist - nobody is. There are only people who apply the scientific method as part of an attempt to gain a better understanding of some kind of physical phenomena...but the reasons for doing so are varied.
Secondly, nobody with a significant amount of preconceived notions that are largely rooted in degenerate leftard politics can call themselves a "scientist" and expect to be taken seriously. It's well-known that RF, especially in certain frequency ranges, are harmful. The meme of ionizing radiation is just that - another unproven hoax floated along with the 1960s anti-nuclear energy propaganda campaigns. Let us guess - you also believe red meat and sugar is BAAAAAAAD for consumption, because science (even though not an iota of science supports these claims). You've already taken the idiotic position that the EMF emitted by phones and other wireless electronics is safe, and that the plebs just need to be explainerized more betterer. That's the most imbecilic position anyone could take. Do you walk around with a diaper strapped to your face?
The trouble is, it's generally the people selling measures to counteract it that are the real malicious ones, less so the people just peddling those ideas because they came from an apparently credible source
@@alphaforce6998 Are you quite alright?
@@Bagofnowt Are you?
We need to visualise theory for better concept clearance this is what action lab doing so well love your content
I was hoping you would measure radiation under powerlines, while holding up a fluorescent tube that's lit up "wirelessly"
Nothing to worry about, that would be the static electric field. All that would do would give you an itch.
@@tomctutor how is it static? It oscillates at 50/60Hz
@@tomctutor way to go brainer🤘😁
Nikola Tesla lived to 86 and died from a heart attack, those electric fields aren't dangerous.
@@WolfangStudios73 Still a high electric field intensity whether its AC or not. ↯
Thank you very much for such a wonderful video this is an issue I've been concerned about for at least a year or more.
I can’t wait till 7G so my downloads happen before I even think of them.
😂😂 love it
😂
If they move to 7g there would ha e to be a cell tower inside everyone home because it's not going to even penetrative paint😅
Fun fact:
Radiation levels near the base of a mast can be many times higher than further away.
Not because of the signal from the mast, but fom mobile devices "screaming" to find reception in what is an area of poor coverage.
That wasn’t very fun…
The concern is effects over a very, very long period of time with consistent exposure. Which there are almost no studies on, especially in the US where there are huge amounts of money preventing such studies being done. Yes, we all know it’s nothing like actual radiation which causes harm within a short period of time, but what we don’t know is the effects of this more minor radiation over 20 years. To simply ignore the potential, with a lack of studies, is ignorant.
yes
I work in this industry. I would really like to know the long term effects also.
@@joepromedio I will say that there have been some German studies on the long term effects and they did not look too good. If you’re in the industry I would really urge you to look and try to find some of those in other countries. I think I remember reading there was a significantly increased number of people developing cancer who lived near a cell tower. The US is just too corrupt with too many lobbyist for this stuff for now
Yeah... no studies exist at all regarding long term 5G exposure. But why do people even care? The only people who think that might be cause for concern are those who really do not understand physics. Why? Because the sun exists. Nobody is concerned about dying early because the sun exists. Therefore nobody in their right mind should be concerned about piddly little 5G
Research Barry Trower.
Your microphone is interacting with the device and your heart...much love. ❤
I work on the towers, the RMF detectors we wear don't go off until we are hugging the front of the antennas. If you are in directly in front of them (within a foot or so), you can feel parts of your body warm up. It takes hours of exposure at that distance to it affect you and dissipates within minutes of moving away.
Things like radar and satellite microwave are what will mess you up, but for that to happen you'd REALLY have to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I had an electronics Navy instructor tell the class how a crewman climbed up and went over the fence in front of the ships rotating RADAR antenna to sterilize himself. He was cooked and died horribly. I think the Tesla death ray generates high power microwave energy.
@@solarsynapse I used to work for a satellite TV network. The 20 ft uplink dish had a fence of yellow police tape around it. The uplink engineer told us that if we got inside the zoned off area that we would get a suntan real fast...
One thing you didn't test was using your cell phone near the tower. 5G directs and concentrates signal to your phone. This will significantly increase the cell tower radiation in the proximity of your phone. I'd be curious to see you testing that scenario
Beam forming has not been implemented for mid-band. It was supposed to be for High-band 28/39Ghz Millimeter Wave spectrum.
hes lying 5g towers are dangerous they are short wave! 5g is bad no matter where its coming from. this would be controlled opposition. wake tf up peeps!
@@irock5624 amazing way of saying " I know absolutely nothing about radiation or wave lengths, btw I never payed attention in science class because of my lack of intelligence, instead I'll just listen to my crazy mothers Facebook groups because I'm an ignorant American"
Theye can fry you when your targeted
@@Test7017 really so like wouldnt it be really bad for the dude who installs them and flips them on and a standing right there next to it while it's running?
This guys channel is killing it! I remember watching his videos when he was at 30k subscribers. Now he’s everywhere. It’s guys like this that deserve our attention, not tik-tok stars getting views from eating tidepods
Exactly. Science needs more interest
Now they brush their teeth with sand paper soaked in cleaning chemicals.
@@sinisterthoughts2896 good I'll send them some bleach and dog shit sandwiches
Tide pods? What do you think this is….2010?
yup, hes an absolute madman, he made videos that I never even thought of (like being able to see magnetic waves, mirror room, the self moving fish thingy, sound illusions, simulation theory, I could list more if I have to)
I enjoy your experiments so much! Thank you for sharing your knowledge and your love to educate us. YOU DA MAN!!!
@NominePater, we're laughing at you!
@NominePater, it is. I love the truth.
@NominePater, WikiLeaks has nothing to do with our conversation. Further, that line about it is quite the pile of bullshit. Classified documents are classified for a reason. WikiLeaks can unintentionally cause seriously grave damage to our security.
Just some food for thought: the average intensity of sunlight hitting our planet all the time is around 300 W/m^2, which on this meter would have registered 300 000 (300 000 mW/m^2).
Here's some more food for thought: If there was some kind of shadowy cabal that didn't have our best interests at heart that was ready and willing to deliberately cause adverse health side effects - who's to say that the manufacturer of this meter isn't a member of said shadowy cabal?
@@ColonelSandersLite truth
@King Pistachion You're a good repeater of their slogans... Put your face diaper back on and obey.
@King Pistachion It was a conspiracy theory that Johnson and Johnson was covering up the potential adverse health effects of their baby powder right up until it wasn't.
The very first sentence of this video is "Today we're going to be testing if the [signal] from your [personal communications device] is going to [lethally incapacitate you] or not".
I'm all for such testing. I'm merely playing devils advocate and pointing out a potential flaw in the test.
More food the sunlight covers ir visible uv etc..... this is just the 5g frequency we are concerned about. And yes the uv portion of sunlight will damage your eyes and burn your skin...
Only thing I know about cellphone towers is the ones in rural or suburban areas that are slightly forested is that the small animal and insect population is tiny or nonexistent in the area that is within about 300 to 600 yards of the tower while the rest of the area will have your normal insect and small animal populations. Ones that are the most noticeable is I never hear cicadas in the area around the tower even if there is a large number of trees around the tower but you walk down the road a couple blocks and you hear the cicadas again.
Nature doesn’t lie but the governments do.
I’m now disabled since all cell towers and other RF meters became very close to me.
I didn’t think it was an issue until I did research on the dates these things were installed. That’s when I started to get sick by something no doctor I have met with can help me with.
I’m not a tin hat but I don’t believe in coincidences.
If anyone else has noticed this with your heath please reply to this post.
@@susana5052 you are disabled??
@@fulaan1 Yes I am. I’m 100% disabled and getting worse each day. I’ve been trying to move but it’s not been easy. Everybody’s playing California so the prices are going up everywhere.
I basically need to get away from all the electronics in the city.
@@susana5052 how are you writing this message
@@TwoForFlinchin1 with a cellphone with an EMF protector. Yes it does work. I had my electrician scan it with some kind of machine he uses. I also had him scan some other things in my home including my TV. The router is the one that uses a lot of power and produces a lot of bad energy. I had that moved on the other side of the house. I also sit at least 10 feet away from the TV.
Holding a beautiful piece of uranium,
in his hand and near his heart, he says,
"It's radiation is very dangerous" :)
In a physics class in school this is an opportunity for further teaching, (1) demonstrating the acute drop-off as the uranium sample moved only a couple of centimetres away from the Geiger counter, as can be seen in the video, and (2) talking about how one's epidermis stops things like alpha particles and ultra-violet except at extremely short ranges/high intensities, but not beta particles or gamma rays.
Good video. As an amateur radio operator I can understand people’s nervousness about RF energy. Anyone who has touched an antenna that is transmitting might receive an RF burn instantly depending on the frequency and power in the antenna. But as you said, the power diminishes immediately with even a few feet. I prefer to use my Bluetooth EarPods which is only a few milli-watts next to my head as apposed to around 1 watt from the phone itself, so roughly 1000 times lower. Should check what Bluetooth headset signal strength reading is. I know Bluetooth isn’t 5G millimeter wavelength, but it’s the same wavelength as a microwave oven. Also need to see what the signal strength from your microwave oven is…
5G in most cities will use the LTE bands as the FR2 bands would be the dumbest thing to use for cellular devices just like NB-IoT.
As if our dollars aren't funding enough dumb projects imagine having to fund Verizon with tax dollars for their pet project
EFFECTS OF RADIATION CIA-RDP88B01125R000300120005-6
WANNA KNOW WHY YOU ARE FAT, CAUSE OF THE 5G , ITS MAKING YOUR LIPIDS SWELL INSULATING TO PREVENT ELECTROCUTION
It is the pretty same,i have some Sony and JBL headphones and when I measure it,it shows me 6V/m =100 000 mikroW/m2 -this is max what my device can measure,so it can be even higher amount of energy;by Iphone it is the same intensity,so imagine this energy direct into your ears-next to brain…I use it only by skiing and cca after two hours of listening music i became headache .I cant imagine what it can cause by children,whos brain is developing only…
Keep using bluetootk and you will end up with Alzheimer. Did you took the covid vaxx and boosters?
Would have been great to also see how the meter detected 3G and 4G as a comparison as well.
3G is going off. 5G uses all frequencies, same as 3G. LTE is most common, I don't really think that meter is going to tell exactly whats going on. The real 5G is hardly being implemented yet.
@@gregsz1ful yeah, you're pointing out one of the huge problems with nay sayers. 5g is implemented across a variety of bands. I think TMobile has them here in Denver. The stuff is insanely fast, but the signals can't even make it through the walls of my apartment. Most "5g" towers are really just a protocol upgrade from 4g. They are not the high bandwidth ultra high frequency transmitters. Those are reserved for high density areas. The lower frequency is designed for penetrating walls and long distances at the trade of bandwidth.
Also how come cell phone providers don't have EMF meter's at there location's. It would be nice to know if your phone is not making you sick. Like bad headaches, and blurry vision from blue light.🤔👍😎
@@waynef9314 There are standards by some government safety stuff. Dangers have been discussed for years. How about classrooms where all the kids have pads and phones. EMF meters are not used for detection. RF meters are. EMF is basically low frequency magnetic radiation, like an electric motor. Many of these cell tower crazies never talk about or measure the phone itself, right on your ear.
@@gregsz1ful omg, i just got a perfect product idea, thnks
I love that you chose this topic and hope you will continue exploring it in your videos. Your personality, curiosity, and visual aporoach makes learning/exploring science easier and much more fun . Thank you!
World Health Organization?? Not an outfit that has anyone’s best interests at heart!
more like world death
Sorry sir, you spelled it wrong, it's abbreviation for World's Hell Organization. Btw: they include age appropriate sex ed for little children ... amongst all kind of other wrongdoings. Fun fact: They are financed and thus controlled by private investors, first of all Pill Bill.
Great info. This is good to know thank you The Action Lab.
Your cell phone WILL KILL YOU, 'cause you're going to be preoccupied looking at something on your phone, and then step into traffic, and get smacked by a very large "particle", known as a bus !
Studied as the “Pokémon GO” phenomenon
@@ethanmacleod1721 "Oh, is that an Ekans or a Car?"
Morgan Freeman: It wasn't an Ekans
What about the cliff
I bet theres a number of people that died in fires started by their smartphone battery. So they can be leathal^^
Kid got isekai'd
The EMF meter used here detects 5G network signal and RF up to 10Ghz. 5G Ultra Wideband uses the 28 and 39 GHz millimeter wavelength spectrum bands.
seems an important fact
I like How He Just Has Some Uranium in his House
I have 40kBq of Americium-241. You probably do too. In the smoke detector.
And he held it right next to his chest for a good amount of time too! He’s a brave man
@@btat16 Not really. Radiation is inside all of us as well. It isn't that dangerous.
Shouldn't that uranium ore be store in a lead pouch?
Holding that small amount of uranium near his chest insn't really that dangerous considering there are people who have to work with similar materials daily.
What's nice is that he's completely safe the whole time. The piece of uranium ore is the most dangerous thing in the video.
Can you tell me why you are on here comment at least twise a week for over a year?
@@DaBigBoo_, the truth never sleeps.
The road is much more dangerous.
”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”
~ George Carlo PhD
@@Fifasher2Kcause of all the towers, aye?
@@londonuntergunther252, you keep lying to people. You must be a bot.
Thank you for making the point of the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. This is very important to understand. The signal is stronger when you get a bit further from the tower because of the “umbrella” effect of the signal pattern from the antennas.
It's actually not that important at all to understand considering the microwaves emitted in a microwave are non-ionizing. The process for them to *become* ionizing has to do with the shield plate within the microwave which is used to filter-reflect the non-ionizing microwaves so they bounce within the chamber of the emitter until they attain the resonance factor required to pass through the filter - which is designed to be the gain of resonance of *ionizing radiation.* Which should be common sense. It's a wave. Just like sound waves, just like liquid waves, there is such thing as resonance factor. This is why when you microwave a grape it doesn't just "cook". It bursts into pure high-heated plasma. Look it up watch a video. This is due to the grape being the same size of the microwave oven's matured wavelength.
This is not just a factor that happens by resonance alone. This can also happen by multiple waves collapsing upon each other of the same resonance frequencies or waves in octaves. Right now I have hundreds of 5G wifi routers around me. I can hear it. It sounds like hundreds of tambourines. These frequencies are in the similar ranges as the military ADS device which cooks skin on people in crowds at 94 GHz. 5G goes up to 300 GHz. Right now they use 2.5 and 5.0 because they're trying to make people get a blind association of thinking 5G "means 5 GHz". They are almost there since people seem to forget, it means 5th generation. Meanwhile everyone seems to not even care to discover the actual numbers and data.
@@ShaunVillafana its so sad, honestly. Thank you for this
@@ShaunVillafana Might want to get that tinnitus checked
Unfortunately the point of difference was not made between non-ionizing radiation "heating" effect and it's vibration effect on cells and DNA. The real danger of 5G.
Thinking that "heating" is concern of anyone who knows anything about the topic . . .is a red herring.
@@2Truth4Liberty Very well put. The major factor is not the heating but the resonance itself given that DNA is piezoelectric crystalline and the cell is spherical which would act same as the grape traping resonant frequency inside, assuming the frequency bandwidth is equal in wavelength to the diameter circumference of the cell membrane. With the DNA at the center of the cell this puts the DNA within the cell nucleus a near-impossible thing to miss.
The frequency only need to be of the resonance factor and no matter the direction "beamwaved" _(*the network company term for the 5G WiFi directional-technology beaming it's WiFi towards the device, and thus, device holder)_ and it would refocus the energy to the center of the cell, directly impacting the cell's DNA, at which point causing it to fracture.
Meanwhile the mainstream media edges their foot-in the doorway of science nuances trying to brainwash the public into thinking that "viruses are alive" and not merely DNA or RNA genetic date.
So we forget the very real factor that our own fractured DNA very well may contain the whole of many of what we call viruses and claim to come inherently from outside of us.
Which begs the question: where did the initial "hull" of the virus come from?
It must have gone through exocytosis somehow.
It would never be able to enter a cell without a membrane encasing it from somewhere and so at some point it had to have originated from within the cells and DNA of some similar being.
I don't think it's far-fetched to conclude it may have originated from within us-each.
Especially since the world health organization put that up as their first "fact check" at the beginning of the lockdown before anyone had even brought up and questioned the possibility. With DNA as piezoelectric, that says it all right there.
We did the calculations in my college physics class years ago. The short version is that the electromagnetic radiation the sun emits so greatly dwarfs everything else that it's not even worth worrying about.
Well that just means we could have evolved with a baseline resistance to radiation, adding more radiation to the mix doesn't mean there's less, you combine the two. Having a cup of water that's always full can still overflow if you introduce more water.
Physics major ?🤔
@@ciiNtHi444 i now realize that
@@010ChrisisCool except sunlight radiation is not harmful. And it’s negligent anyway. 1kW/m^2 is the suns output
@@jimmysyar889 okay so either the argument comparing sunlights radiation is irrelevant because its a different type, or the amount of radiation from the sun (before additional 5G radiation) is not harmful.
Damn, and here I thought 5G will turn me into whatever I wished for.
ua-cam.com/video/XKri2X7HNtM/v-deo.html
naw, mostly just triggers the bioweapon in the death shots to genocide half the world when they send the signal after they get more people to take their mad science shot.. Wow, i wish that was as crazy as it sounds...
only ur BRAIN can do that
@@aboma733 shut up
@@ferdgerbeler8494 let's go I dont have to worry about my future so when is the genocide so I can die in a sick explosion the day before
The sound of the detector against uranium is like the sound in Oppenheimer.....Cool....
That's probably because the movie went for a sense of realism.
If you were my physics teacher, I'd have topped every physics test.
Maybe in a parallel universe.
I doubt it
My physics teacher was like this. Crazy smart showed us his Perfect SATs. They fired him after two years because they didn’t like his methods even though it worked. Students in his classes across the board had better grades than any other teacher. He was way more hands on and not death by memorization or repetition. We did our own little experiments and made our own hypothesis to start every day and he wouldn’t tell us what was right or wrong until we all spoke (about 6-8 groups) and discussed our findings and what we thought. I learned more from him than my entire High School career.
But so would other students as well. So that cancels out.
@The Government yeah. The school in my area hides radiation making 5 G and it literaly forced people to wear masks ONLY RIGHT AFTER school started just so they WOUDNT KNOW THEY NEEDED MASKS! *EVIL*
By far, this is my favorite science/learning UA-cam channel. I always feel like a little kid learning something for the first time. James is the science teacher I wish I had in school. My take away from this video is that electric socks could possibly be more dangerous than your cell phone or a cell tower.
Science? bah
Where was the mention of vibration effects of 5G type waves on cells and DNA?
heating? Is he kidding anyone? The danger is not in heating, it is in the vibration.
This is an junk science channel if you ask me.
Does he really claim to know science? or is that just you thinking his channel is about that? I ask because this is the first video f his I have ever seen.
You have to switch with your EMF-390 from All-in-mode to vertical mode. Then you can see the frequencies to verify 5G or not
Yeah I find it weird how this dude is just so nonchalant about it when many others have felt first hand the effects.
Propaganda tool @@TheStunnerFTW
Not you, guy in video
@@Martin-u2m thanks for clarifying lol I was unsure at first
@@TheStunnerFTW no problem, you are intelligent and no tool
What you said the phone guys are testing the damage of cell phone radiation now and they're saying it's safe. The tobacco guys said the same thing with cigarettes. How long did it take before we found out that it was not safe to smoke? Do you not think the phone guys might lie like the tobacco guys? How much damage is going to be done by then?
Well, millions of phones in operation and no change in the cancer rates. We can put that idea to rest.
very true. Plus the WHO itself is a crime organization funded by the 'elites' like Gates to propagandize whatever serves their own agenda. Never believe these ppl and organizations.
@@topherkrock Theres other damage being done..niot just cancer..and that takes yeara to develop.
@@ccaselli7, there's no cancer or anything else being done. Studies have shown this. Do you know how radio waves work?
@@topherkrock I know well...u clearly havnt done enough research. Checkout the EMF guy utube, Nick Penealt, and Loyd Burrell. Also, did u hear about the court case in Italy...where a man won the case against mobile phone company for it giving him cancer?
"so now let's see if our phones emit ionizing radiation"
**Geiger counter starts beeping very fast**
**Smiles nervously**
Lol
They call it COVID-19. Do your research on the Vodafone executive who exposes the scam! The pandemic is a coverup for the rollout of the deadly technology. Billions will die worldwide as the towers go up, and the "internet of things" take over.
@E.M.S God Bless you!
Your relying on the World Health Organization page 😂😂
Sorry sir, you spelled it wrong, it's abbreviation for World's Hell Organization. Btw: they include age appropriate sex ed for little children ... amongst all kind of other wrongdoings. Fun fact: They are financed and thus controlled by private investors, first of all Pill Bill.
I can't explain how factual* and understandable action lab is
Action lab will always be remembered ❤️
you're saying that like he's dead
@@fish_speckle6936 With the way some people are commenting here, some might actually think he is simply
because he was messing with the oh so EVIL 5G!!1111!! 😱😱😱
Because we will get overrun by tinfoilers soon! 😂
Okay
@@pavel9652 No, we will not. Their fear from all of the conspiracies and unrelated facts will push them underground or they will stay in their mama's basement. :D
1:01 That one sentence made me understand that. when you have long wavelengths it acts more like a wave, that makes so much sense
The lesser signal under the cell tower is from angle of radiation from the antennas . Most of the signal is being transmitted for range ,so the small amount is because of this angle.
Can't wait for people to say "6G will kill you! I'll stick to 5G"
Lmao
ua-cam.com/video/XKri2X7HNtM/v-deo.html
@Will Survive you know everything has radiation
there wont be 6G (probably) cause 5G is the best it can physically get
Laughs at 4G
0:15 there goes the partiality of this video out of the window.
Good report, brother! I worked in testing RF systems independently for 15 years and you're spot on. I had and still have no financial stake in these technologies. I agree we need to study human effects, but alarmists saying there are hundreds of studies showing the harmful effects of 5G is just not true.
The effects have been studied and there are none.
Unrelated but interesting fact about radiation:
Till today, Marie Curie’s office chair and doorknob are 10 times more radioactive than background radiation. 🤯
So are emissions and tailings from all coal power plants.
Did you know that red pottery and bananas are radioactive?
@@digitexstudios5634 yes
Did you know there is a difference between radiation and ionizing radiation? Ionizing is the nasty one.
@@digitexstudios5634 yeah
when flying i always select seat 5G so that i can use my phone during the flight.
I sit in 2B, or not 2B. Depending on how philosophical I'm feeling.
@@labibbidabibbadum R2 for me....
@@ronumpleby3517, I choose C3, but if it's not available, then I go with P0.
As you can see in this video, uranium gives you lots of clicks on your vids
The *ONLY thing* that radio waves can do is *transmit data and create heat.* If it's not heating you up, then it's not affecting you.
The most ironic thing is the ad at the start of this video was talking about how we are experiencing, this isn’t an exaggeration of what they said, “100,000,000,000,000x” more radiation from all the WiFi in our homes
Ikr lol
Got the same one lmao
Yeah got the same shitty ad
The reason you were not getting higher readings when closer to the cell tower is that you were probably not in the radiation pattern of the antenna.
No, good theory. But its something alot more simple.
There is somthing called the "blanketing effect". It basically just goes over you, due to it being so high up in the air
@@GRDL. Except that he was using a signal strength meter and not an interfered receiver. Radio waves in the near field are also not so fully formed until they are in the far field, but admit I do not know how this comes into play on all frequencies and antenna types.
He said it can effect the water in us. We are 70% water seems like a pretty big concern. He tried to make a debunk video but this still makes 5G look bad to me
Exactly my thoughts..
EXACTLY!!!!! The fact that this video is still posted proves he’s trying to debunk all the fear over this BS 5g rollout!!!!! Don’t buy it folks
Its only heat up lil a bit. _.
What are you concerned about? The waves don't do anything to us. They harmlessly fly past you all the time doing exactly nothing to you.
I'm seeing a lot of ridiculousness when it comes to 5G, or the knowledge of microwaves. To understand _why_ *5G won't hurt you,* you need to look into the following:
*What do we know about light:*
1. Light can be used to transmit information.
2. Light creates heat.
3. Light is perceived by our eyes.
4. When "concentrated", light can cut and burn things.
*Does this make light dangerous?* No. Most light is safe to use due to the low power level that it designed for. That's also true of the *lower frequency EMF* that we use for communications.
Can you hold the meter close to an induction stove or a microwave oven? I'd be curious what the numbers would be in this case...
Anything that used ac currents emits emfs. Blender microwaves ect. Check out the government suppressed book “the magnetic blueprint of life”
Microwaves do NOT 'leak' from microwaves.
Microwaves cannot escape a microwave oven. The grill on the front prevents energy escaping because the grill holes are less than the actual wavelength of microwaves.
in short, you're 100% safe.
The induction stove has an _extremely_ strong field, but almost no radiation at all.
I have a meter. The microwave is the most powerful emitter in my home by an order of magnitude
@@donavonneighbors There’s inversion in everything from these Satanists
That's an awesome emf meter! Figuring out what device its picking up
Thank you action lab for content thats never before,ever after
What?
Didn't understand you bro.
Godzilla had a stroke reading this and fucking died
You a troll, you saying he is doing the experiment everybody has done, you dont like it? Unsubscribe.
@@fedi1140 Rick Astley had a stroke reading this and fling died
Man thanks a lot for making our days and minds brighter and smarter, I truly appreciate your work.
Some other considerations:
1. What is the penetration depth of the 5g radiation? Test with a 1cm thick meat piece between phone and the meter.
2. How electromagnetic waves effect neurotransmission (other than heating), as it's mainly electrochemical?
3. How 5G compares with 4G? (Relevant to places where 5g is still being implemented)
What I expect is, the amount of radiation that actually reaches out brain is very low. I guess, the electromagnetic effect on neurotransmission is still under research and there's no clear answer.
I’m worried about the effect on neurotransmission
1) penetrates all the way
2) none
3) both are harmless
@AileDiablo time to wear your tin foil hat
@AileDiablo space is psuedoscience
@AileDiabloI agree with you, it's odd to think in terms of humble sensibilitynow days. We live fast and hard because we have to. We trust that our delicious hamburger, fries and milkshakes is all goodness. As we race off to the fill up the gas tank and buy some bottled water and a coke.( I do none of that, I'm a tree hugging florist) Why does everyone live this way? Humans can be programmed and conditioned, so we are. We are not all the same. Some are more prideful and competitive. Some are kind and conscientious. Others are psychotic and narcissistic. You think your powerful in your purchasing power so any one suggesting you're foolish, is upsetting even offensive to most. Understandable. But you are foolish and arrogant and stupid. And conditioned, influenced and manipulated. No humility or sensibility, just a vast sea of dumbed down Americans who will jump at anyone's throat should a reasonable thought be presented to them. That's partially due to the fact that 80% are magnesium deficient and have no chill. All I see is road rage and super market flare ups. Stop getting so offended. It's shows that you're not well. Most everything is designed for ease not health. And most buy into it. We get sicker they get richer that includes anything medication related, hospitals & most politicians. It is all about the money and playing on pride and ignorance.
Action lab laying down the truth! Great channel!
@Will Survive ua-cam.com/video/_QkKOTsW8jk/v-deo.html
I worked at a uranium mine in the 1970s for a while; my girl friend didn’t like it because I glowed in the dark! And she still couldn’t find it.
It's really nice to finally see the principles of radiation, as it relates to our phones, explained for the average person. I do wish basic radiation protection would have been covered as well, but you covered what was most important, considering 5G isn't ionizing radiation. Well done!
For those that are curious - Time, distance, and shielding are the three keys to reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. Reduce time of exposure, increase distance from the source, and shield the most sensitive anatomy.
Dr Devra Davis, epidemiologist, ”We’re seeing tumours in the hearing nerve, we’re seeing tumours on the cheek, we’re seeing tumours in the brain right around the area, and we’re seeing tumours on the side of the head where people most often hold their ‘phone. … this is a very, very serious problem and we had better get serious about addressing it.”
Dr Jack Kruse, neurosurgeon and EMF effects researcher: ”5G is going to be the biggest assault on the human race ever seen…. It’s amazing to me, every day, how much I learn about what engineers are doing to electromagnetic waves to bring 5G to obedient idiots who want to watch Netflix faster. It just is shocking what they’re doing.”
Dr David Carpenter, ”The movement to higher frequencies involves higher energies and therefore we’re concerned that it’s going to result in greater health hazards to human than our current technology, which already we’re showing is associated with increases in certain kinds of cancer, in certain levels of effects in the nervous system.”
Kevin Mottus, ”5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home.” (Mottus says that they will emit frequencies between 24 - 90GHz, going much higher than I indicated in my previous emails.)
”We are literally microwave radiating our population and we’re wondering why there’s so much cancer and chronic illness. ..We already know the lower frequencies cause cancer and neurological problems. We expect this to be much worse, much quicker. We are literally experimenting with people’s lives. .. We need to start pushing back and stop allowing them to use us literally like rats in an experiment. … 56 billion dollars to roll out 5G (in the US), zero money to look at the health effects. That should alarm people.”
The industry on 5G: Tom Wheeler, (then) FCC Chair and former senior lobbyist CTIA, ”Unlike some countries, we do not believe that we should spend the next couple of years studying what 5G should be or how it should operate The future has a way of inventing itself. Turning innovators loose is far preferable to expecting committees and regulators to define the future. We won’t wait for standards. … Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity… and that’s damned important.”
Dr Paul Heroux, ”As Tom Wheeler from the FCC says, it’s a lot better to let these innovators loose and fill the surface of the earth six metres and deeper with microprocessors thereby slaughtering the human race out of oblivion than to risk losing a profit.”
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied)
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe,’‘Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.”
Dr Devra Davis, ‘After all, I reasoned, cell phones must be safe. Some of those complaining about health problems had the intense passion about the matter that one tends to dismiss as not credible. If there were really any serious problems, I reasoned, the governments of the world would not blithely underwrite the global spread of this technology. Having spent the past six years learning what some have known for four decades, I now understand I was mistaken.’
Camilla Rees, ‘’This is about saying ”no” to EMF pollution and to the many forms of corruption that are driving it in media, government, universities, associations and the false front non-profits that have official sounding names of good but are actually fronts for industry. There are many aspects of deception and deflection and actions not aligned with the greater good built into this issue.’’
George Carlo PhD, ”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”
Joel M Moskowitz PhD,: ‘‘We were sort of caught in a difficult place because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been premarket testing, cell phones would never have made it into the market place.”
@@londonuntergunther252 Thank you 👍.
Which one is the most sensitive anatomy?
@@AlwaysOnForever Reproductive organs & breast tissue.
@@Simplicitywins thanks for replying after 7 months, but did you deleted your own reply?
If he had made this video a year and a half ago it would've been one of the most viewed videos of the 2020
Most 5G is sub-6 and runs over the same frequencies as 4G tech. That was likely what you were picking up.
Exactly: the improcements aren't in the frequency but in the modulation method. Plus the only really dangerous frequency under the line of ionizating frequency, is 2.4ghz, being the natural resonating frequencybof water and the same used in microwave ovens. Still until you emit hundreds of watts, it's basically harmless.
this is incorrect.
5G specifically doesn't share space with 4G.
It can't.
As close as they've gotten is to get coexistence, but 4 and 5 G can't run simultaneously like bluetooth/Wifi and the whole BT/WiFi coexistence problem was a BITCH to solve because we were stuck in 2.4GHz.
Both of you people are spreading unscientific disinformation.
I don't think you'd understand the actual IEEE standards documents, or I would "prove" it. But anyone who is trying to buy an unlocked 5G phone from Amazon better do their homework on spectrum distribution or you're going to be more disappointed than the 4G rollout (I worked on the first gen 4G tech development and deployments as well as the first 60GHz/mm wave WiGig preliminary technologies that eventually became 5G).
Here's an excerpt from the THOUSANDS of articles on this subject.
What you need to know about 5G frequencies
At its highest speeds, 5G should be able to reach as much as about 2 gigabits per second (Gbps) - two orders of magnitude faster than LTE, which tops out around 35 megabits per second (Mbps).
To get that speed, 5G networks rely on much higher operating frequencies than existing cellular networks, reaching into what is called the millimeter wave band. But because high frequencies have shorter range than lower frequencies, 5G uses a mix of network frequency bands, generally classified as high, medium, and low.
Here is an overview of these frequency bands:
Low-band 5G operates between 600-850 MHz. This is similar to what 4G networks currently use and is only moderately faster than 4G, between 50-250 Mbps offering similar coverage areas for each cell tower. Not all cities and regional operators are deploying low-band 5G towers; some are opting to start with mid-band towers. Even so, it's possible for a 5G device to connect to a low-band 5G network and achieve speeds similar to 4G/LTE.
Mid-band 5G operates in the 2.5-3.7 GHz range and delivers speeds between 100-900 Mbps. While offering less range per cell tower, this type of 5G is going to be the most common implementation of 5G networks for many years to come. It's a reasonable compromise between network speed and range in both medium-density urban areas and less dense rural regions.
High-band 5G is the band that is most commonly associated with 5G. Operating at 25-39 GHz, this is known as "millimeter wave" spectrum and delivers gigabit speeds (currently tested as high as 3 Gbps). The tradeoff is that millimeter wave transmitters have very limited range and require the deployment of many small transmitters, so it's only viable in urban areas where transmitters can be near closely spaced homes and buildings.
5G inside your house actually counts on multipath signal reflections to get its super high speed and penetration around corners/up stairs.
that was the crux of WiGig at 60GHz - worked brilliantly well but at stupid short distances (this is about 2005-2006), once we figured out that we could use all these reflections inside the house as sort of aggregate passive repeaters it was short order to get it throughout the house unless a door was closed upstairs.
Intel was gonna use that to try to scale WiFi technology, but as Metro-Fi so aptly proved, WiFi doesn't scale and THAT'S why it's not on tower base stations. There are still free +7db 2.4 GHz antennas all over Portland Oregon if you want to climb up the streetlights and take them.
Good point.
The resonance frequency of water is around 22 Ghz.
I would love to see a study on cell phone use and if it correlates to an increase of anixety and/or anger in humans
It doesn't. No correlation or causation.
Phones, no. Twitter, yes.
You forgot to explain the penetration depth or the skin effect. with that power and that wave length there is no possibility for those waves to penetrate in your organs and do any damage. Additionally 5G signal is very weak in penetrating, for this reason you ned lot of hot spots.
As always amazing video!
That's why they wear tin foil hats. In fact, I'm surprised some companies haven't sold tin-foil ear muffs
@@mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 what?
@@mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489
The problem is that there are so many studies that clearly show the dangers and effects of EMF and non-ionizing radiaton on human health, but these studies are ignored and the consequence is that there is an increase of tin foilers and misinformation.
The European Parliament released a paper "Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health" last year. You might wanna read what their researchers had to say? And do me a favor read it if you want, but don't tell me that's too much text.
"Non-ionising radiation, which includes radiation from mobile phones and 5G, is perceived as harmless in general, due to its lack of potency. However, some of the above-mentioned scientists point out that, in the particular case of 5G, the issue is not the potency, but the pulse,15
the frequency to which the whole population will be exposed due to the dense network of antennas and the estimated billions of simultaneous connections. As 5G employs a very high level of pulsations, the idea behind 5G is to use higher frequencies, which allows such high levels of pulsation, in order to
carry very large amounts of information per second. Studies show that pulsed EMF are in most cases more biologically active and therefore more dangerous than non-pulsed EMF. Every single wireless communication device communicates at least partially via pulsations, and the smarter the device, the more pulsations. Consequently, even though 5G can be weak in terms of power, its constant abnormal pulse radiation can have an effect. Along with the mode and duration of exposures, characteristics of the 5G signal such as pulsing seem to increase the biologic and health impacts of exposure, including DNA damage, which is considered to be a cause of cancer. DNA damage is also linked to reproductive decline and neurodegenerative diseases.
"A 2016 review of scientific articles, covering experimental data on the oxidative effects of lowintensity radiofrequency radiation in living cells, finds that, among 100 currently available peerreviewed studies (18 in vitro studies, 73 studies in animals, 3 studies in plants and 6 studies in humans), '... dealing with oxidative effects of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation, in general, 93 confirmed that radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative effects in biological systems'. More precisely, in 58 studies of laboratory rats, 54 show positive results, and 4 of 6 studies in humans were positive. In addition, 17 of the 18 of the in vitro studies were positive, including two on human spermatozoa and two on human blood cells. According to the authors, 'The analysis of modern data on biological effects of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation (RFR) leads to a firm conclusion that this physical agent is a powerful oxidative stressor for living cells'.
A 2018 study carried out on animals, showed that electromagnetic radiation emitted by wifi networks can lead to hyperglycaemia, increased oxidative stress and impaired insulin secretion in rat pancreatic islets. A method of creating diabetes (which can lead to kidney deficiency in the long term) in laboratory rats is to expose them, even briefly, to 2.4 GHz."
Source: European Parliament in a paper
"Effects of 5G wireless communication and human health"
But long wavelengths are better penetrating than short wavelengths, aren't they? I mean that's the reason why microwaves work and they are operating at the same frequency as 5G, according to the schematic in this video. Of course microwaves use rediculously amounts of power, but still... the radiation should penetrate, shouldn't it?
it's not about the penetrating power, it is about ionizing energy. because ultraviolet light have high frequency they have high energy that exceeds the ionization energy of the atoms in the molecules of our dna. microwave in the other hand produces heat. if you put uv light in your left hand and put your right hand in a microwave, you would get a burn in your right hand and mutations in the left
If it means watching videos in 360p instead of 144p I don’t mind if 5G kills me
Lol 4g near me is better than my internet speed. We have a mast quite close. I get 2mb/s over our network but 4G network gives me like 6mb/s
@@iCore7Gaming and I complain about 203 MB/s
@@leagueoflegendsplays9420 wtf
@@leagueoflegendsplays9420 u youtuber ??
LOL. You'll die of old age first.
This is one of the best science channels in all of UA-cam history.
Radio waves do not affect us in the slightest. The only _possible_ harm comes from thermal damage.
We need more people like you. Your videos are so informative and educational. Every video you make is always interesting as well. Thank you so very much for what you are doing.
We already have enough people ignorant of the health damage caused by 5 G. We do not need more people like him.
@INSECT BITE *-* 5G existed before your opinion of it. I say opinion because I know genuine research doesn’t make it too far past your eyes. Chemistry is really hard, I get it. You can’t project your insecurities on others though.
@@taylor92493 I'm talking about his videos in general.
That was actually pretty good. You didn't use a lot of fear mongering big terms that a lot of groups try to use to scare people.
This was his opinion look up dr devra davis a real scientist that put in real work that has the truth. Also Barrie tower. I was effect but radiation
YA CUZ UR FEELING MEAN THE DIFFRENCE BETWEEN FACTS RIGHT ..... Aren't U A BRIGHT ONE
@@ShazbotNanewNanew, way to be a DB to someone you don't know and for no reason.
@@ShazbotNanewNanew what the fuck are you even talking about.
2:30 How much radiation from the uranium did you give your heart by holding it that close for those 10 seconds?
Im concern about him
Not more than a normal X-Ray
Most of it is stopped by his clothes and skin
@@awesomefacepalm but isnt uranium will generate gamma ray??
Oh ya mostly uranium generate alpha particles... so he is fine...
@@WayneCXT99 yeah, but it's not enough to do anything bad. Unless he has it in his pocket for a much longer time it won't hurt him
It only has a chance to cause him problems if he holds onto them for really long time, cuz the probability of small particles hitting your dna is low.
I work exclusively on MMWave 5G and the only adverse effects I’ve experienced is fatigue from working my ass off building the stuff 12-16 hrs a day. People freak out over shit they don’t have a clue about.
Yeah it's true, ignorance is the most dangerous weapon
Increased mortality in the last several years (after 5G towers) is like 25% in most western countries.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo I can't believe I am reading this, you either are a bot to troll us or the stupidity made person
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo Most of the particular western country where I live doesn't have any 5G! It would be truly astonishing if mortality has increased by 25% due to 5G.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo, you're just lying to people.
Me with a 4g that have 10k/s speed : i am 4 parallel universe ahead of u.
@@xaravien nothings wrong but i don't get unlimited net like others atleast with slow speed i should get unlimited net but i only get 2gb per day for 600 INR/3 months so i dont care abt speed but i want interneetttt
INR? Ks? Wtf do these mean
@@urs915 inr is indian national rupees (indian currency)
@@urs915 k/s = kilobytes per second
@@_superthunder_ oh, thank you 👍
To all Facebook moms: This is called doing your own research, by directly experimenting or reading scientific papers, not by reading Facebook memes
Here you go read these...Thanks for being OPEN MINDED
ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/
@@TheTubejunky Environmental health trust has been debunked and called alarmist for spreading misinformation about 4G and 5G. That's not scientific research.
@@professorx3060 Source?
The majorpart of 5G antennas are "active", so, to test the real radiation near antenna, you should put the radiation-meter between your phone and the antenna.
He did.. the phone was in his pocket and he held the detector out between his pocket and the tower.
@teflontelefon bruh that's just a laser
The phone vs Sennheiser test makes perfect sense. The 5G network protocol employs many different bands at once to find the best connection, whereas the mic transmitter only works on one band at a time, selectable through the RF menu on the device.
Interesting that almost no EMF was detected from the phone or router. Does your meter read all three frequencies at once, or do you have to select which set your measuring? i.e, turn a knob from RF to EMF?
That meter reads all of it at once but you can switch it to focus on a certain one. I have the same meter and it surprisingly does not come up with much EMF anywhere except when I'm near power lines or an electrical field.
Thank you so much for showing other regular devices like you did at 5:34. As an electrical worker who went through some relatively rigorous electrical math schooling, it pains me so badly when I read about people who have zero understanding of how electricity or magnetism, or radiation actually works. This video is like salve on a wound.
As an electronic tech myself, I understand your point. I also have suffered from the other side of the equation. When my health failed I discovered we also have metal parts that react to electricity, magnetism, and radiation. A healthy person has 77 different essential minerals in their body. Some like calcium are metals. They make nice antennas for all frequencies; and when they're engaged such, they aren't supporting the body anymore in that time of exposure. Research lifespan of radar operators
Dr Martin Pall, “You do not put out EMFs without doing safety testing. It is an atrocity to do that.”
Dr Magda Havas: ”If it was a real problem I would know, if it was a real problem the government would protect us, how come I’m not hearing about this? These are
all things I’ve heard when I’m giving seminars. They say, ‘oh, yeah? If this was really a problem they’d have told us’. I am they. I am a legitimate scientist and I am telling you.”
Dr Devra Davis, epidemiologist, ”We’re seeing tumours in the hearing nerve, we’re seeing tumours on the cheek, we’re seeing tumours in the brain right around the area, and we’re seeing tumours on the side of the head where people most often hold their ‘phone. … this is a very, very serious problem and we had better get serious about addressing it.”
Dr Jack Kruse, neurosurgeon and EMF effects researcher: ”5G is going to be the biggest assault on the human race ever seen…. It’s amazing to me, every day, how much I learn about what engineers are doing to electromagnetic waves to bring 5G to obedient idiots who want to watch Netflix faster. It just is shocking what they’re doing.”
Dr David Carpenter, ”The movement to higher frequencies involves higher energies and therefore we’re concerned that it’s going to result in greater health hazards to human than our current technology, which already we’re showing is associated with increases in certain kinds of cancer, in certain levels of effects in the nervous system.”
Kevin Mottus, ”5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home.” (Mottus says that they will emit frequencies between 24 - 90GHz, going much higher than I indicated in my previous emails.)
”We are literally microwave radiating our population and we’re wondering why there’s so much cancer and chronic illness. ..We already know the lower frequencies cause cancer and neurological problems. We expect this to be much worse, much quicker. We are literally experimenting with people’s lives. .. We need to start pushing back and stop allowing them to use us literally like rats in an experiment. … 56 billion dollars to roll out 5G (in the US), zero money to look at the health effects. That should alarm people.”
The industry on 5G: Tom Wheeler, (then) FCC Chair and former senior lobbyist CTIA, ”Unlike some countries, we do not believe that we should spend the next couple of years studying what 5G should be or how it should operate The future has a way of inventing itself. Turning innovators loose is far preferable to expecting committees and regulators to define the future. We won’t wait for standards. … Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity… and that’s damned important.”
Dr Paul Heroux, ”As Tom Wheeler from the FCC says, it’s a lot better to let these innovators loose and fill the surface of the earth six metres and deeper with microprocessors thereby slaughtering the human race out of oblivion than to risk losing a profit.”
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied)
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe,’‘Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.”
Dr Devra Davis, ‘After all, I reasoned, cell phones must be safe. Some of those complaining about health problems had the intense passion about the matter that one tends to dismiss as not credible. If there were really any serious problems, I reasoned, the governments of the world would not blithely underwrite the global spread of this technology. Having spent the past six years learning what some have known for four decades, I now understand I was mistaken.’
Camilla Rees, ‘’This is about saying ”no” to EMF pollution and to the many forms of corruption that are driving it in media, government, universities, associations and the false front non-profits that have official sounding names of good but are actually fronts for industry. There are many aspects of deception and deflection and actions not aligned with the greater good built into this issue.’’
George Carlo PhD, ”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”
Joel M Moskowitz PhD,: ‘‘We were sort of caught in a difficult place because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been premarket testing, cell phones would never have made it into the market place.”
The amount of radiation is not as much of a thing than the wavelength of it and its resonance with molecules in your body. Radiation is "safe" when it passes through your body without resonating with anything. 5G is NOT safe because it affects the body.
Not sure what "math" you talk about but that math does seem to make you some science guru feeding us with a false sense of safety and security.
I bet you would go into a mictowave and cook yoursrlf for a minute if your math and the WHO would tell you so. Some healthy common sense is priceless, eorth more than any indoctrination....eeehm sorry, I meant education. ;)
@@jannieschluter9670 As someone who has failed highschool, I agree with you. Sorry to interrupt with this stupid comment, but I couldnt help myself from commenting because your answer seems pretty reasonable.
Same....drives me crazy. So much ignorance and conspiracy theories.
This was really interesting! Thank you for clearing out the differences between radiations :)
Even non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer, don't let this fool you. UV light is non-ionizing (it doesn't have the power to remove electrons) but can still cause skin cancer.
@@thewhinjaninja3610 oh.. right. Didn't think of that D:
@@TnZAustin There is no safe level of radiation, just lower doses (i.e. natural)
@[hehe] Are you sure about that? 🤔
@[hehe] And what's sugar got to do with radiation?
This just shows that people really don't understand how electromagnetic spectrum works.
What do you mean bud?
Here in Australia my Provider uses the same bands for 5G as 4G. The bands we use are 1.8GHz, 2.3GHz, 2.6GHz and 3.4GHz. Indoor coverage is rather 1.8GHz or 2.6GHz bands here in Australia.
My hearing aid with the telephone switch “on” can easily pick up electromagnetic sounds from 5G towers, power lines and Smart meters on electrical circuit panels. It’s a strong electrical humming buzz sound.
My hearing aid doesn’t pick up any other electromagnetic fields like the earth or electrical outlets but these three powerful sources.
What you are hearing is the demodulation of the packets :)
@@DrummerRF I wish I could decode the demodulation of radioactive packets. 😏
@@DrummerRF I can here mine with no hearing aid and it sounds like the servers in the old movies/80s very electronic
@@DrummerRF Also I hear a humming sound but when I get away from my apt it goes away or even outside.Also I down a emf reader before and the entire air around here is saturated with emf
That’s normal it’s a hearing aid of course your gonna hear some stuff that is not normal
very informative! please do a follow up when they release the report next year, would be great source of objective information
So that's why I get that warm feeling talking time my mom on my cell phone! 🙂😊😁
Ya, because the phone gets warm, not because of the radiation.
Excellent demonstration. Thank you
I KEPT CELL PHONE IN MY WASTE BAMD FOR PANDORA FOR COUPLE DAYS DOING STUCCO BY SECOND DAY MY KIDNEY HURT SO BAD I ALMOST NEEDED DIALYSIS, BUT I DRINK PURIFIED WATER, DRANK 100% CRANBERRY JUICE AFTER 2 YEARS I GOT IT ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL NOW USING CELL TOO MUCHJ ON RESEARCH HURTING MY BRAIN ,I CAN FEEL WHEN MY CELL IS ON IN AIRPLANE OR ON FROM PAIN IN MY BRAIN OR KIDNEY. STUDY PANDEMIC CHINE HOW 20 MILLION CELL USERS DISAPPEARED OR DIED?!!I QUIT USING MY CELL SO I CAN HEAL FROM BRAIN CANCER AND KIDNEY CANCER..I SAW 2 PICTURES 1 MONTH OF FRIEND AT CRAWDAD FESTIVAL AND BOUNTY HUNTERS WIFE END OF MONTH BOTH DEAD EXTREME CASES OF CANCER , ONLY PICS I SAW THAT MONTH, STRANGE!
PINTEREST@SCOTTPATNODE3
UTUBE : p NODE
SUMSCO VANPAT
That's how u show how nerdiness is attractive as hell.
Really appreciate your work
I didnt watch the entire video but I can definitely say that he's probably roasted a lot of 5G karens
He keeps it polite... I guess because he wants to actually persuade them that 5G is harmless, and calling people idiots has a way of making them stop listening to you
You can always turn off 5g 😉. 4g is not that bad ,it's just that 5g is faster than 4g.
@@jp9707 I wish more people had this attitude instead of having the intention of making the person that believes the conspiracy theory look like an idiot and ridiculing them, which only makes the person less likely to listen.
I would have no patience personally dealing with these smol brain people, it's the same with flat earthers. You just wonder why they exist at all
@@slothy387pooh6 not exactly 5g related but… what the science says and what the package says and what the phone does are all three dif things. but here’s something from us small brained skeptical types
Picked up by several high-profile sites, a new report from RF Exposure Lab claims to shoot down safety reports from the FCC about the iPhone 11 Pro. Its results state Apple's hugely popular smartphone emits more than double the legal limit for RF radiation (3.8 watts per kilogram versus the 1.6W/kg limit.)
Instead of moving the meter to the uranium, he moves it towards his whole body. Bloody Genius
Just assume that 100% of everyone is after your lucky charms 100% of the time. It's a safe bet. You'll rarely be wrong.
Best comment so far! 😄
”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”
~ George Carlo PhD
_"tophy"_ is a paid liar & or an idgit.
@@londonuntergunther252, please stop lying to people.
"5G phone emits 5G radiation"
Everyone: "OMG"
5G is same waste of technology as DAB radio. Other than military, no one needs it. 4G is pleanty for speed and reliability.
I remember when 64KB RAM was good enough, I also remember when 1GB was huge storage, O also remember when 2G came out and was blazing fast at 300Kbps. There's no such thing as fast enough as technology is constantly evolving. 3G used to be fast enough back then and 4G is fast enough for now but 5G once it's available in many places will open new experiences for people around the world. Downloading a movie in mere seconds is something good. Because it means teams can also work remotely and not worry about sharing data because they don't have to wait for downloads of large files.
@@asandax6 so why DAB is very dead technology and 5G towers are burning down?
@@donpindol778 burnt down by karens
@@asandax6 Is "good" good enough?