POV: FBO UPGRADED TURBO 2023 CIVIC TYPE R
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
- FL5 modifications
* MHI Stage 2 Turbo
* PRL Intake
* PRL Inletpipe
* PRL Intercooler
* PRL rear motor mount
* P2R Catless downpipe
* MRT sport touring mid-pipe
* Hybrid racing thermostat
* Acuity silicone radiator hoses
* Xdi HPFP
* Xdi 1400cc injectors
* Ported intake manifold
* Drilled fuel line
* Custom tune
* Hondata flash pro
* Swift springs
* Enkei TS7
Sounds great I'd like to link up with you and do a collab video sometime I have a stock FL5 so it would be cool to see the difference between the two.
SAME!
@@100GANGNATE We outside!
Is there noticeable boost lag on the mhi2 vs the oem fl5 turbo ? Obviously the mhi make more power but I mean for daily driving
Lag is present, but it's not as noticeable as in the RV6, and PRL turbos. The lag isn't terrible though. I daily drive my car, I’m in love with it.
What is a conservative HP the stock internals for engine and transmission built to handle for the FL5?
For a conservative estimate, I'd say high 300s to low 400s, considering these cars' ability to handle a lot of stress before needing to build the motor.
be nice if you pushed it enough to hear it.
Stock internals can handle this? This is nice.
The stock internals can handle my current setup, since it's torque, not horsepower, that poses issues. There are 500-600whp Type Rs running on stock internals.
Whats the dyno numbers?
Haven’t gotten dyno’d yet but the car should be in the 400s
If you stay consistent with this fl5 content I may just consider this over the Elantra n.. price difference is a HUGE factor
It’s a 10k difference. Not too bad
@@SIIKAP1 true, but 10 k is 10k lmao for virtually similar performance. The type R will destroy the N on a track but when it comes to everyday driving I’m not gonna carve corners to get a Big Mac lol, plus the N has a valve exhaust stock
@@mylesdobson2072 then get the N. I chose the R because to me, it looks better, it has hatchback utility, the shifter and seats feel better, and the resale value and reliability are likely to be better. If acceleration was my primary buying factor, I’d have gotten a Mustang GT for a similar price. The R has a stock valved exhaust as well, but no burble tune like the N.
@@SIIKAP1 both are very practical for everyday living, I personally don’t need a hot hatch in terms of trunk space. I agree the shifter, reliability, and resale is leagues better in the R. If the R wasn’t marked up it would be no competition here. But you can get an N for under msrp stock which is closer to the 26-7k mark, a stage 1 tune can beat the 5.0 and THAT is why I’m conflicted
@@SIIKAP1 both are very practical for everyday living, I personally don’t need a hot hatch in terms of trunk space. I agree the shifter, reliability, and resale is leagues better in the R. If the R wasn’t marked up it would be no competition here. But you can get an N for under msrp stock which is closer to the 26-7k mark, a downpipe + high pressure fuel pump will beat 5.0s and v8 m3s. (I can link those videos if you need proof) For 10k less you get a better sounding valve exhaust with the ability to turn off the burbles if you prefer the Dyson air blade sound of the R.
tune?
Yes, the car has a custom 93 tune from Anonymous performance K20C1.
why are you using only half the revs
I'd say it's because you can barely put the stock power down with wheel slip.
You should have catch cans.
Should I?🤷🏻♂️🤔
@@FL5ghostit’s useless and just adds extra complication for nothing. Causes more issues than anything. It’s a gimmick.
@@Reptilianoverlord-jc8mt🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
kinda weak its a civic...
L comment
And you drive a Prius so go play some more Forza/GT kid
They are modding civics in 7 sec 1/4 mile....they are out running supercars...😂😂😂
You do know that Civic is just a name, right?