Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

What If North Korea And The U S Went To War

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2020
  • Hello
    Today we are going to talk about Haneul and Kangyoo a North Korean defector from North Korea.
    On 'Buk - Shi -Tal TV' channel we make videos on the North Korean
    Thank you.
    ----
    Buk - Shi -Tal TV
    / %eb%b6%81%ec%8b%9c%ed%...
    Dimple Business Mail
    awesomely9468@gmail.com
    ----
    Thanks for watching.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @Cblizy
    @Cblizy 4 роки тому +11696

    Bro north Korea would struggle in a fight against Georgia. Toss in Alabama and Florida you got a landslide victory. But to keep it simple we could just send Texas.

    • @simon77047
      @simon77047 4 роки тому +1709

      we wouldn't need the whole state. Dallas would do just fine.

    • @Kiritolar
      @Kiritolar 4 роки тому +499

      The ships or the states?

    • @simon77047
      @simon77047 4 роки тому +718

      @@Kiritolar The USS Dallas was a Los Angeles class nuclear attack submarine. I think one do would the trick. ::??

    • @Kiritolar
      @Kiritolar 4 роки тому +165

      @@simon77047 That sounds about right yeah

    • @sammas2184
      @sammas2184 4 роки тому +593

      why send Texas when all we need is Rambo.

  • @epicfire6870
    @epicfire6870 3 роки тому +4536

    Fun fact: the NYPD has a budget three times as high as North Koreas military budget

    • @NeshWhorl
      @NeshWhorl 3 роки тому +54

      umm bc is a poor country? and newyork got lots of people

    • @AeonsOfBlight
      @AeonsOfBlight 3 роки тому +308

      @@NeshWhorl there's only around 36,000 officers in the NYPD.

    • @anamericancelt6534
      @anamericancelt6534 3 роки тому +147

      Before or after defunding them?

    • @edwardvalivonis23
      @edwardvalivonis23 3 роки тому +11

      North Korea spends 10 times more money than US police could

    • @Ouro44
      @Ouro44 3 роки тому +188

      @@edwardvalivonis23 the NYPD fund from the city alone is a third of the entirety of North Korea’s GDP. From these guy’s testimony, I wonder where the military budget for NK goes since the personnel barely get anything from it and they operate with 20-40 year old technology.

  • @stacy9032
    @stacy9032 3 роки тому +455

    "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts. There should be no war"
    These are the truest words ever spoken. Wow. So powerful. Love you both! I'm glad we are not enemies.

    • @Palomar23
      @Palomar23 3 роки тому +14

      Right? The US could easily win over North Korea, but it would still cost lives

    • @michaelperez5822
      @michaelperez5822 3 роки тому +1

      @@Palomar23 but they would have more because their weak and suck they shouldn't talk all this shit because their jealous because we're the best in the world🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @Audio041194
      @Audio041194 2 роки тому +3

      I get the proverbial meaning, but I have had one of the diabetic needle poke things prick me and well it didn't hurt. That would be NK to America in war.

    • @lomborg4876
      @lomborg4876 2 роки тому

      @@michaelperez5822 then you suck at anything else.
      Can’t even go two weeks without a school shooter or a riot. What’s your preferred gender pronoun btw?🤣

    • @imcharlie1637
      @imcharlie1637 2 роки тому

      We dont need to go to war we would just send 2 be bombers over N korea and nuke 10 of their major cities and they are gone war over

  • @paytonkraft7564
    @paytonkraft7564 11 місяців тому +27

    I know it's late to be talking about this, but congratulations to both of you for managing to get away from North Korea. Thank you for making these videos and educating us.

  • @KurNorock
    @KurNorock 4 роки тому +3201

    "No matter how old it is, it's still a tank"
    Oh you poor sweet child...

    • @ThirsTDemon
      @ThirsTDemon 4 роки тому +181

      I thought the samething

    • @empereurloutre
      @empereurloutre 4 роки тому +618

      It's so naive, just thinking about the range and reactive armor.
      A fight between 2 tanks would be :
      US Tank spots the NK tank
      US Tank come in range to fire
      NK tank still haven't notice US TANK
      US Tank fires, NK tank is totally annihilated
      and even if NK tank miraculously come in range to fire, they would just damage the reactive armor and then got instantly destroyed

    • @vagabondwastrel2361
      @vagabondwastrel2361 4 роки тому +233

      I think it is more about a tank being a tank. Tanks are a big shit test to infantry and structures. Yes, modern armor would simply destroy the nk tanks with style. You can still use them as hardpoints hidden from view like what was done in ww2... except with a hell of a lot more setup time. I think google earth would have been a bigger "oh shit" than showing tanks. "I can see you have some chipped paint on your hand rail... from space.

    • @Rawdawgggg
      @Rawdawgggg 4 роки тому +216

      didn't end well for the iraqi T72s the first or second time the US were there. But to be fair, how much do these two really know, they're drawing their experience from the north korean military, and alot of that knowledge was probably propaganda and not factual.
      sick haircut tho

    • @aldomartin2992
      @aldomartin2992 4 роки тому +87

      I mean he has a point. If an infantry patrol unit meets a tank there will be casualties. Tank to tank it's definitely unfair 😂

  • @charlesduus2584
    @charlesduus2584 3 роки тому +3112

    “Even the special forces can’t always get them.”That awkward moment when the average American gun hobbyist has better equipment and access than North Korean special forces.

    • @Papawill13
      @Papawill13 3 роки тому +118

      How is that Awkward? The average American in 1776 had the greatest weapon on Earth, in the rifled barrel. Most English soldiers, as in over 90%, just had muskets. So the average Farmer had a better Gun than most of the Greatest Military Force on Earth at that time. Its the ONLY reason why America exists.
      Go look up the Battle of Bunker Hill, there is a reason the English won that battle but lost almost 3 times as many soldiers as the Americans did.
      Most deaths in battle come when one side breaks and flees the battle, but in the Revolutionary War the Americans were able to retreat from almost EVERY Battle without sustaining casualties. This was because of the Rifled Barrel. As the Americans fled (which they were great at during the War) they had sharpshooters slowing down the advance of the British, which allowed the fleeing Americans to gain distance and regroup.
      The Rifled Barrel was Very Expensive, but for people on the Frontier it paid for itself with its accuracy. Most Armies, including the British, did not have the money to arm their soldiers with Rifles, so they got muskets.
      America lost almost every major battle in the Revolutionary War, but they won almost every Skirmish because of the Rifle.

    • @capnsteele3365
      @capnsteele3365 3 роки тому +57

      @@Papawill13 if the United States was never trained by that Prussian general, we would have lost.

    • @Papawill13
      @Papawill13 3 роки тому +43

      @@capnsteele3365 Oh I disagree. I would argue the greatest fault of George Washington was trying to beat the British at their own game. Fact was a Skirmish Warfare tactic would have been much more successful. Using the individual(s) to attack supply lines and marches of the British. Wear down their ability to fight the war, forget paying for the war.
      Now, I am Not in Anyway diminishing the Fact and Truth of what you have said. But in terms of labeling One reason as the #1 reason America exists....... The Rifled Barrel.

    • @Riku-Leela
      @Riku-Leela 3 роки тому +3

      True true, not that it's particularly a good thing 😅

    • @yellow_rose-
      @yellow_rose- 3 роки тому +21

      How the hell did this turn into a history lesson?
      Don’t come at me this is a joke...

  • @youghi7513
    @youghi7513 2 роки тому +44

    "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts" thats a awesome line much respect to him.

  • @johnryan6422
    @johnryan6422 2 роки тому +46

    I loved the navy comparison lol. I don't think they understand the difference in tonnage between their ships and modern naval ships. He called the Pueblo a massive ship, its only 177ft long, and it was a spy ship from the 60s. I mean, the American military industrial complex is a behemoth. For example the american airforce has the largest number of military aircraft in the world, the american navy has the second largest number of military aircraft in the world.

    • @QWER-wv5kn
      @QWER-wv5kn 11 місяців тому

      그럼 뭐해? 공격하지 못하는데? 공격할수도없고, 공격하지도 못하는 무기는 위협을 할수있고 협상을 할수있게 만든다. 하지만 실전에서 공격하지 못한다면, 실전에서는 나무막대기랑 같다. 미국의 90년대중반 이후의 행동들을보면, 미국은 절대 북한을 공격할수없다. 북한도 미국을 공격할수없다. 똑같다. 미국은 스스로 망가지게될것이다. 한국도 마찬가지.

    • @adamb89
      @adamb89 10 місяців тому +6

      Also they glossed over the important part: America's navy is smaller for many very good reasons, and that's *why* it's stronger. North Korea is wasting money on a fleet that large. They only have about 1500 miles of coastline to worry about, and 46k square miles of land to support their fleet. America has 95k of coastline, and nearly 4 MILLION square miles of land to support it. We're pouring more resources into a smaller fleet, resulting in a much more powerful one. It's the difference between being able to slap someone 1000 times, or punch them once hard enough to cave their chest in.

    • @dwvw
      @dwvw 10 місяців тому +2

      Pretty sure the NK subs are old diesel powered 50's-60's tech.

    • @swimmingmide
      @swimmingmide 8 місяців тому +1

      @@parallax3d Those aircraft carriers also host dozens of fighter planes that have a collective radar signature of a dinner plate that could make the entire country a no fly zone.

    • @Covertghost
      @Covertghost 7 місяців тому +1

      @@dwvw NK subs have windows
      it's a different type of deal
      they are much quieter than US subs though

  • @WarInHD
    @WarInHD 3 роки тому +2864

    Fun fact: the largest air power in the world is the US Air Force. The second is the US Navy

    • @SAVikingSA
      @SAVikingSA 3 роки тому +178

      Marine Aviation: The Navy's Army's Air Force

    • @Sevo-
      @Sevo- 3 роки тому +126

      Lol its odd that this is a legitimate fact

    • @hruaipuia1851
      @hruaipuia1851 3 роки тому +78

      3rd : The army 🤣

    • @user-po8wc5ql4m
      @user-po8wc5ql4m 3 роки тому +28

      Marine and naval aviation makes the largest air force in the world FYI

    • @gxd9903
      @gxd9903 3 роки тому +11

      Thats a flex

  • @PepeTheFrog304
    @PepeTheFrog304 4 роки тому +2331

    U.S soldier: so what did u do in the army
    NK soldier: i picked herbs

    • @Sweedster
      @Sweedster 3 роки тому +52

      My grandpa was a typist in the Marine Corps😂

    • @austinevs
      @austinevs 3 роки тому +81

      @@Sweedster Your grandpa still had combat training that would be the same as every non infantry job (MOS).

    • @Sweedster
      @Sweedster 3 роки тому +7

      Austin V that’s very true

    • @pandamilkshake
      @pandamilkshake 3 роки тому +30

      @@Sweedster And I bet the military would give him a bulletproof vest...NK Special Forces don't even have them 🤣🤣🤣

    • @shikikankillzone4239
      @shikikankillzone4239 3 роки тому +29

      That's a meme in Brazil's army, generally, when you've got so much free time on your hands they tend to go lawnmowing some sections around bases.
      My father told me that when I was 12

  • @jackorear2536
    @jackorear2536 8 місяців тому +4

    North Korea wouldn't last long enough for Kim to get another bad haircut!

  • @shangron5796
    @shangron5796 3 роки тому +17

    Don't forget this is just the tech they let us know about, the secret stuff would definitely blow some minds.

    • @bdr32965
      @bdr32965 3 роки тому

      Truth. There is no doubt we have weapons that only a select few people know about. The US won't put all of their toys in the sandbox for everyone to see, they hold back the best and most advanced toys in reserve only to bring them out if needed.

    • @Bialy_1
      @Bialy_1 3 роки тому +2

      You need to buy the tech with tax money and that is not a secret... so no, they do not have secret alien weponds in some secret military magazine!

  • @donotcareatall
    @donotcareatall 3 роки тому +1965

    Ain’t gonna lie but y’all showed them some pretty weak ass videos

    • @ikari_smh
      @ikari_smh 3 роки тому +312

      Wouldn’t want to give them nightmares

    • @TheMiniWumbo
      @TheMiniWumbo 3 роки тому +251

      Yea dude on the right seems to be hanging on some patriotism tbh

    • @1629con
      @1629con 3 роки тому +58

      @Colin Hamel it's still technology which can be implemented in the future though

    • @Ken-md2jg
      @Ken-md2jg 3 роки тому +22

      Juss 1 Carpet Bombing Its all over
      O wait ye Geneva, Ok...

    • @Optimaloptimus
      @Optimaloptimus 3 роки тому +9

      Colin Hamel M1A2* M1A3 hasn’t even entered service.

  • @dr.hugog.hackenbush9443
    @dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 3 роки тому +1124

    "Behind every blade of grass is an American with a gun."

    • @zeyferdcheddarcheese1096
      @zeyferdcheddarcheese1096 3 роки тому +73

      Behind every piece of greenery is a farmer with a gun

    • @bored2096
      @bored2096 3 роки тому +6

      @@zeyferdcheddarcheese1096 💀💀😂😂

    • @Dr.Westside
      @Dr.Westside 3 роки тому +3

      Not quite how it was said but close enough .

    • @haziq9130
      @haziq9130 3 роки тому +2

      You mean Vietnamese?

    • @BeyonderStar
      @BeyonderStar 3 роки тому +3

      @@haziq9130 you don't understand the meme?

  • @laurenfazenbaker9777
    @laurenfazenbaker9777 10 місяців тому +2

    I'm very happy these two young men escaped North Korea and are making lives for themselves. God bless them

  • @markc312
    @markc312 3 роки тому +6

    Fun Fact: There’s a Difference between a Rocket & a Missile. With Rockets you have to aim at your target in order to Hit it but with Missiles you just Set it & Forget it. Meaning Missiles can change Direction/Course in Flight to Hit a target Extremely Accurate nearly 99.9%? of the time. Missiles work in a Variety of ways wether it be GPS, Laser targeting, Heat-Seeking, Camera Operated, etc…

  • @Rime_Di_Michelangelo
    @Rime_Di_Michelangelo 3 роки тому +1307

    "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts."
    God please, let this man live a very long and happy life.

    • @Boushin
      @Boushin 3 роки тому +31

      The problem is, N-Korea wouldn’t be able to do anything against US because of the difference in technology but Seoul would be hammered back to stone age in a couple hours.

    • @Boushin
      @Boushin 3 роки тому +10

      @John Smith Huge artillery that is pre-aimed to Seoul, let alone all the rockets. That and navy is the only thing N-Korea has going for it.

    • @Boushin
      @Boushin 3 роки тому +8

      @John Smith Sure and it wouldn't even take that long but I'm sure they would be able to fire at least a few times and even that would kill tens of thousands of people at minimum. If any of their rockets got through we would be talking about hundreds of thousands to millions of deaths.

    • @Boushin
      @Boushin 3 роки тому +3

      @John Smith Only in movies you take care of the whole enemy in a matter of minutes with everything going as planned. What happened in Iraq and Afghanistan? The price is small for you because you haven’t even visited Seoul.

    • @notyou2353
      @notyou2353 3 роки тому +20

      @John Smith if you don't live in Seoul, and aren't South Korean, that trade isn't yours to make. Don't spend other people's lives like they're your life.

  • @paecmaker
    @paecmaker 4 роки тому +2112

    Quite interesting to see how little they actually knew of the american forces.
    But also the weapons shown were not really showing how the US military looks today. They should have shown Abrams tanks, F35 in hover mode, reaper drones, an aircraft carrier and why not a regular US soldier with all their equipment. These guys were even amazed that South koreans had body armor.

    • @EatingWaffles
      @EatingWaffles 4 роки тому +310

      Yeah. I'm frustrated that they didn't include Aircraft Carriers in the Naval Forces part. Aircraft Carriers are a force to be reckoned with, and is one of the main reasons why the U.S. is the most powerful in the world.

    • @apachesparatan5849
      @apachesparatan5849 4 роки тому +16

      Yup completely agree

    • @simon77047
      @simon77047 4 роки тому +59

      lol. I think two F22 fighters would have them running back to their barracks. lol

    • @gileaed4718
      @gileaed4718 4 роки тому +105

      Baby steps people do you want them to have a heart attack lol

    • @rasgrizrevelations4145
      @rasgrizrevelations4145 4 роки тому +60

      Show them footage of the Abraham during desert storm shredding through enemy tanks.
      Show the mass lines of artillery and a bombarding practice.

  • @kylen9954
    @kylen9954 10 місяців тому +2

    As an American we're far more concerned with the people there than worried about war.

  • @cathoderay305
    @cathoderay305 2 роки тому +22

    Re: The rockets (Rocket Launchers), the US uses MLRS (multiple launch rocket system). The MLRS is a sophisticated launching system capable of interoperability with other assets, including military satellites for surveillance and GPS. The "rockets" used in the MLRS include the M39 missile. It can be very accurate in comparison to the Katyusha units deployed by North Korea.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 9 місяців тому

      Yeah dude this gotta be weird Chinese propaganda because they greatly lowballed everything. 10x too low for Navy vessels lol. Without China we literally would wipe everything, their airforce, navy, infantry off the map in under a week. Maybe a single day to be honest. IDK what these guys are on about. It all feels like underhanded digs at the US while pretending to favor it. Weird propaganda, donno how I got here TBH

  • @strkeout
    @strkeout 3 роки тому +736

    In 4 years, that guy earned $0.06. You could spend 5 minutes walking in Manhattan and find a dime somewhere on the ground. That's poverty.

    • @Dc-pm2hi
      @Dc-pm2hi 3 роки тому +68

      That's sad and pathetic. I literally found a ten dollar bill on the ground in less than 5 hours

    • @js0988
      @js0988 3 роки тому +9

      Still more homeless people in America than in NK!

    • @js0988
      @js0988 3 роки тому +1

      @Mind traveling Sagittarius Bullshit! Community college costs $30k+ per semester! And in case you haven't noticed, the people who work the most and hardest are the poorest!

    • @mortenfrosthansen84
      @mortenfrosthansen84 3 роки тому +16

      Nah it's just how the North Korean regime keeps its population down

    • @mortenfrosthansen84
      @mortenfrosthansen84 3 роки тому +36

      @@js0988 what are you just climbing out from under a rock?

  • @eatingelizabethsfrizbee
    @eatingelizabethsfrizbee 3 роки тому +686

    "There should be no war" spoken like a true warrior.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 3 роки тому

      @Purplekitty what makes you think they would give up so easily?

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 3 роки тому +4

      @Purplekitty I doubt they'd just instantly give up, considering how heavily they're brainwashed and indoctrinated to their government from the day they're born. Some probably would, but not many.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 3 роки тому

      @Purplekitty ok you didn't literally say that but you implied it. I agree on that point, they definitely couldn't hold up (physically) for long.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 3 роки тому +1

      @Purplekitty well maybe you should work on your writing then, cause you most certainly did in your first comment.

    • @loukaskosta2597
      @loukaskosta2597 3 роки тому

      @Purplekitty ³³³³³³³³

  • @zeropointnineninenine4951
    @zeropointnineninenine4951 3 роки тому +4

    I pray for the safety of these men. You know what happens to those with the courage to do and say what they do and say.

  • @richardpierce7819
    @richardpierce7819 11 місяців тому +3

    I remember a quote from George Washington " The American Christian will die on their feet before they live on their knees " 'nuff said.

    • @Snipergoat1
      @Snipergoat1 7 днів тому

      George Washington wasn't really a Christian as most people think of them. He was an Unitarian. They have some rather sharp departures from Christianity as most practice it. I bring this up because although they do come from the Christian tradition, they don't usually refer to themselves as Christians. Early Americans weren't quite as religious as many believe. About a third of the founding fathers were either Deists or Unitarians. Yeah, that left the other 2/3rds as Christians, since atheism as we think of it today wasn't really a thing back then.
      All that to say, that Doesn't sound like something George Washington would say, neither in content nor style. He was generally a moderate spoken man. He wasn't a fire brand like Patrick Henry or Thomas Jefferson. Your quote has probably been miss-attributed as it just doesn't fit with what we know about him. (He probably has as many quotes wrongly attributed to him as Albert Einstein does.)

  • @Noimcuban
    @Noimcuban 3 роки тому +609

    "the latest US weapon" shows a gun made in the 70's.... lol

    • @lightbenderga2017
      @lightbenderga2017 3 роки тому +87

      And it's not even one used by anybody in the US Military.

    • @VidskogAirsoft
      @VidskogAirsoft 3 роки тому +53

      They should've shown the naval railgun/gauss cannon. Crazy.

    • @welkiesshitpost7156
      @welkiesshitpost7156 3 роки тому +16

      Eh, we can still beat their ass with it! XD

    • @againstalltyrants9001
      @againstalltyrants9001 3 роки тому +4

      And one that was never adopted by the US and is far less effective than tons of other rifles and personal firearms that we field lol

    • @jacobwerner274
      @jacobwerner274 3 роки тому +1

      That was a civi owned gun most likely

  • @GuardianLords
    @GuardianLords 3 роки тому +1549

    US Difficulty settings:
    Easy - North Korea
    Medium - Russia
    Hard - Some farmers

    • @jesusofbullets
      @jesusofbullets 3 роки тому +214

      I CAN STILL HEAR THE TREES... THEY SPEAK VIETNAMESE!!!!!!

    • @The_Golden_Circle
      @The_Golden_Circle 3 роки тому +6

      Lol

    • @notyou2353
      @notyou2353 3 роки тому +19

      @@cyrilleyong9615 your "pissing in a bush" comment makes me think of a story from Schwartzkopf's autobiography, "It Doesn't Take A Hero" (if I remember the title correctly). He described an incident during his time in Vietnam when two US military men went off by themselves for whatever reason and were later found decapitated, with their balls and cocks in their mouths, posted up someplace the VC knew Americans would travel.

    • @highendservicesbarrieont8347
      @highendservicesbarrieont8347 3 роки тому +2

      Kudo GL for respecting the farmers

    • @GorillaCookies
      @GorillaCookies 3 роки тому +47

      The US Military action in Vietnam was not a War. A War involves taking as much of a enemies ability to wage war away as well as not allowing any suspected military asset to remain if possible. In Vietnam the US Military was not allowed to war fight in reality. It was simply a disaster of epic proportions . I wouldnt even describe it as a police action since we werent allowed to really do much from the get go unless fired upon. My dad and all 5 of his brothers are Marine Combat veterans who served in Vietnam. The NVA & Vietcong werent simple farmers as so many seem to want to describe them. They were battle hardened gorrilla fighters who had been fighting in bloody battles since WW2 . They had a long established transportation and supply route that involved a incredible network of underground tunnels facilities that were thousands of miles in length. Saying the US was Defeated in Vietnam is wholly innacurate. The US Military was easily capable of defeating the north vietnamese. But for political reasons the military was kept from unleashing its potential . The B- 52 bombers of operation linebacker 1 & 2 had no problem convincing the North Vietnamese that peace talks were in their best interest . And those as well as almost every other operation the US military were executing were neutered and left very little chance at inflicting the potential power the US military had by the policians. A Flight of 10 or so B-52 strategic bombers with the order to flatten Hanoi would have been devistating for the people living there. I witnessed 1st hand what a B-52 full of conventional gravity bombs does to a area that its carpet bombed. 10 of them would be a gruesom mess

  • @mechanicalbow
    @mechanicalbow 11 місяців тому +5

    I know this is an old video but even at 3 years old I can appreciate that you gave them the soft version of the strength of the US military. These men seem kind and respectable. I would not want them to be scarred by the real difference. I really agree whole heartily with the statement "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts. There should be no war."

  • @ChillinHD
    @ChillinHD 8 місяців тому +2

    "served as a herb collector", lol so like a farmer?
    "N. Koreans don't even get bullet proof vests" Bruuhhh 🤣

  • @jamesfitzgerald6135
    @jamesfitzgerald6135 3 роки тому +638

    You both are to be commended for surviving NK, then educating the rest of us.
    From a USNavy veteran, thank you and enjoy your hard earned freedom...

    • @patrickbateman2869
      @patrickbateman2869 3 роки тому +1

      Dude this is fake

    • @Wet_pancake
      @Wet_pancake 3 роки тому +6

      @@patrickbateman2869 what?

    • @otcgermit4860
      @otcgermit4860 3 роки тому +5

      @@patrickbateman2869 how?

    • @Ice-tz8jd
      @Ice-tz8jd 3 роки тому +11

      @@Wet_pancake he's an idiot

    • @ledfloyd9035
      @ledfloyd9035 3 роки тому +14

      @@patrickbateman2869 these two defected from north Korea, both their stories are well known and have plenty of supporting research easily found online. Don't really know what you mean by "fake"

  • @_0______00__________0_______0
    @_0______00__________0_______0 4 роки тому +1191

    Hopefully NK can become free from the Kim family without a war. I think of all those videos of NK soldiers charging down a hill with old Soviet era weapons and equipment, and how easily one drone strike would wipe them all out. These two guys seem like good people, and I'm sure there are a lot of other good people serving in the DPRK army who could build a better Korea, instead of getting wiped out for an asshole with a bad haircut.

    • @de0509
      @de0509 4 роки тому +58

      I believe there are several metastable systems in this world of which democracy is the most stable system. The fact that authoritarian systems exist to this day proves to us that there are several systems that are metastable. Push them a bit and internal conflict can cause all sorts of chaos and suffering. But theres still a chance that a slight pressure wont change things at all. To hope for NK to change from within is a pipedream. The NK elites enjoy too many privileges to want to scrap their current system. Meanwhile, the peasantry are too weak to overthrow their government. It seems almost impossible for change in NK to come internally

    • @lastwolflord
      @lastwolflord 4 роки тому +7

      Doubt it. I mean you got people in SK so stupid that they think a reunification will happen soon. And everything will be happy and nothing bad will happen at all.

    • @vagabondwastrel2361
      @vagabondwastrel2361 4 роки тому +6

      @bribios I thought about this for a while years ago. The only way for nk to be free of their current system is from either a explosion wiping out the leadership and sk to quickly takeover. Or if the current leadership/many high ranking military flee claiming amnesty. Any uprising and shift to another government type would be have a prelude of mass lynchings if history has told us anything about when communist regimes fall.

    • @Subjectivity13
      @Subjectivity13 4 роки тому +19

      At this point, I'm not even sure if you mean NK or US when you say, "an asshole with a bad haircut." It could go either way.

    • @kingkanyon
      @kingkanyon 4 роки тому +30

      @@Subjectivity13 True, but Our Leader has a Shelf Life of 4 to 8 years and he has limitations to his or Her (Someday) Power. The other Party Rules without Answering to anyone till he Either Dies or is Violently Removed. Please Vote out the Orange guy, I beg you. I can't take 4 more years.

  • @THEWORDCHRISTIANMINISTRY
    @THEWORDCHRISTIANMINISTRY 8 місяців тому +2

    N.K. would NOT stand a chance. Period.

  • @Aerixes.
    @Aerixes. 2 роки тому +1

    3:47
    him: we have some strong submarines! and they bring the best of the best supplies.
    U.S soldier: *starts writing information on a paper*

  • @xxxxGreenxxxxDayxxxx
    @xxxxGreenxxxxDayxxxx 3 роки тому +251

    "I spent 4 years in NK army and now I work as youtuber." Well you don`t hear that very often.

    • @edwardvalivonis23
      @edwardvalivonis23 3 роки тому +3

      He was herb picker🤣

    • @liquidacid1983
      @liquidacid1983 3 роки тому +7

      Ah yes he did his part in the glorious fight against evil capitalism by picking herbs for 6 cents a year! Take that America!

    • @edwardvalivonis23
      @edwardvalivonis23 3 роки тому +2

      Trump 2020!!!!!

    • @Suledian
      @Suledian 3 роки тому

      Pestily.

    • @jwinthepro
      @jwinthepro 3 роки тому

      @@edwardvalivonis23 lol

  • @discover854
    @discover854 4 роки тому +363

    I remember a couple of years ago when Kim Jung Il died and they North were all up and arms about defeating the South and US imperials. They had a propaganda footage of North Korean army with branches and leaves stuck to their body as camo taking up trenches position dug into the hill side. My first thought was, these poor souls might not know what hit them if the A-10 or F-22 decides to take out that entire hill with incendiary. This is not 1950s anymore where leaves and branches could be use as camo. The A10 and F-22 special camera makes the hillside light up like a Christmas tree with UV heat detection.

    • @UCS_BibaswanChakma
      @UCS_BibaswanChakma 4 роки тому +35

      only one squadron of A-10 is enough to destroy the entire NK military

    • @devinwhite5064
      @devinwhite5064 3 роки тому +10

      ​@@UCS_BibaswanChakma Keeping Talvisota in mind, lets not assume that because we're stronger we auto win

    • @UCS_BibaswanChakma
      @UCS_BibaswanChakma 3 роки тому +1

      @@devinwhite5064 don't take it seriously haha.

    • @devinwhite5064
      @devinwhite5064 3 роки тому +18

      @@UCS_BibaswanChakma why not? War is a very serious thing. And ima keep it real chief. I dont want a vietnam 2 electric boogaloo

    • @zombiejelly4111
      @zombiejelly4111 3 роки тому +8

      Devin White but it won’t south Vietnam was a shit show. Look up how many government overthrows and assassinations there were. South Korea on the other hand is strong and “united” lol United heheh

  • @jubreakitjubawdit5188
    @jubreakitjubawdit5188 2 роки тому +1

    They should've showed these guys the fake "Bostondynamics" parody robot video where they attack the robot with bees and it acts all nervous and shit.... hahahaha

  • @quanahhurtt1833
    @quanahhurtt1833 3 роки тому +1

    Did I miss the part about drones?
    My older brother told me about military drones back in the early 80's.
    Us has had drones for 40 years.
    40 years.

  • @lightbenderga2017
    @lightbenderga2017 3 роки тому +933

    "No matter how old a tank is it's still a tank" Right...*cough* *cough* Desert Storm *cough* *cough*

    • @gamergamer5115
      @gamergamer5115 3 роки тому +37

      Yea lmao battle of 34th easting if im not mistaken

    • @Aronteed
      @Aronteed 3 роки тому +24

      @@gamergamer5115 73 easting

    • @Ike-kn5dt
      @Ike-kn5dt 3 роки тому +69

      In a way he is entirely correct.
      A 70 year old 105mm HE round will kill you just as dead as a 5 year old 120mm HE round.

    • @lightbenderga2017
      @lightbenderga2017 3 роки тому +50

      @@Ike-kn5dt Maybe so, but you also gotta take in account that tanks 70 (or even 40) years ago lacked a lot of the gear modern tanks have, such as IRNV equipment, CROW’s nests to fire the top-mounted machine gun from the safety of the cabin, the ability to mount reactive armor, and so on.

    • @Ike-kn5dt
      @Ike-kn5dt 3 роки тому +62

      @@lightbenderga2017 yes, but that's not necessarily the point.
      An old m60 could hypothetically kill an abrams with a side shot, so you can't just act like you're all invincible because your abrams has all this cool stuff on it. That's why the Saudis lose them in combat playing rolling bunker.
      And tanks aren't gonna always be fighting other tanks, you could easily get engaged by a tank as an infantryman and even if it's a T-34 it's still more than capable of lobbing high explosives at your position. It's still a tank. And that's the point being made by the dude in the video, it's still got a big ass cannon and is probably bullet proof. So while it might not stand up against an m1a2 it will fuck your bradley or jltv up in short order

  • @jasonpatterson8091
    @jasonpatterson8091 4 роки тому +480

    GangYou's comment about the US having modern warfare experience was really insightful. Equipment numbers don't really mean anything until you know their quality, and the experience of the people using them.

    • @VainerCactus0
      @VainerCactus0 4 роки тому +12

      Yes, and NK can't afford new equipment from China, so I imagine everything they have is outdated, probably from the 50s.

    • @chengbros6101
      @chengbros6101 4 роки тому +3

      VainerCactus 0 facts USA:I thought it was world war 3 not world war 1

    • @DavidEVogel
      @DavidEVogel 3 роки тому +1

      You made an important point. North Korea has no combat experienced soldiers.

    • @shanchan8247
      @shanchan8247 3 роки тому

      And they forget the US is great at psychological warfare. Open up NK to McDonald's, narcotics and the Kardashians and they are done! Conquered!

  • @samsignorelli
    @samsignorelli 3 роки тому +2

    And the navy part didn't even mention aircraft carriers...12 active with 1 fitting out, 1 under construction, and 2 ordered.

  • @jimgordon3206
    @jimgordon3206 Рік тому +1

    Just imagine there is LESS malnutrition in the navy. That reminds me of a Monty Python skit with an ever changing sailer talking about cannibalism in the Royal Navy. “Let me be clear. There is no cannibalism is the Royal Navy. And when I say none I mean almost none.”

  • @firsttpt
    @firsttpt 4 роки тому +477

    Little Kim logic: We have 65 gray squirrels and all you have is one Doberman and a Pit Bull..

    • @pauldavis9387
      @pauldavis9387 4 роки тому +57

      firsttpt excellent analogy. I also noticed they never mentioned aircraft carriers once. The US has more than all other nations combined with more on the way.

    • @jakecarpenter397
      @jakecarpenter397 4 роки тому +10

      @@pauldavis9387 On top of that all the carries outside of US control are the shitty little ones that only hold like 8 attack helicopters.

    • @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489
      @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 4 роки тому +2

      NK will not hesitate to use nukes. US will not use nukes. Big difference.

    • @gedeyogam9096
      @gedeyogam9096 4 роки тому

      Yeah...mr worldwide ale...ale

    • @joedapro1118
      @joedapro1118 3 роки тому +12

      @@mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 yeah but once NK launches a nuke, the US also won't hesitate to launch a nuke. It's called MAD or mutually assured destruction.

  • @markowirya2405
    @markowirya2405 4 роки тому +357

    My guys over here spilling all the North Korean secrets 😂

    • @midgetman4206
      @midgetman4206 3 роки тому +37

      As if NATO didn't already know

    • @Schdcdd
      @Schdcdd 3 роки тому +7

      I mean, yeah, they are defectors lol.

    • @sloogles5939
      @sloogles5939 3 роки тому +3

      Bruh they finna "disappear"

    • @TheExplosiveGuy
      @TheExplosiveGuy 3 роки тому +1

      Lol, what secrets?

  • @stevegirard-voiceaudiopodcasts
    @stevegirard-voiceaudiopodcasts 10 місяців тому +1

    As I remember, the USS Pueblo was a small research ship turned into a spy ship.
    There were only about 70-80 sailors on it…. And we got them back through negotiation.

  • @jjhpor
    @jjhpor Рік тому +1

    Ya gotta love these guys. They seem so fresh and innocent.

  • @jasonpatterson8091
    @jasonpatterson8091 4 роки тому +596

    The navy comparison was roughly similar to saying that the North has more horses than the US. Also, the Pueblo Incident involved a slow research ship that had been commissioned for spy work and was crewed by barely trained sailors in international waters. It was being chased and fired on by several attack craft and a sub. The captain surrendered because his ship had little in the way of defensive capabilities (two .50 caliber machine guns that only one sailor knew how to operate) and he knew they couldn't escape. It took a submarine, five attack craft, and two jets to capture a slow boat armed only with two machine guns, and the North still crows about it to this day.

    • @Amani-zo8ic
      @Amani-zo8ic 4 роки тому +72

      They need anything to prove they’re better

    • @AC-gb7do
      @AC-gb7do 4 роки тому +75

      I read up on it, and the way the NK military treated the US POWs from the Pueblo was disgusting. It’s truly amazing how NK isn’t empty yet from everyone trying to get the heck outta there.

    • @reckyourself6948
      @reckyourself6948 4 роки тому +50

      I also thought the navy comparison was pretty ridiculous. The table didn't even show aircraft carriers or missile cruisers. If my memory serves me right, the US has more than half of the world's aircraft carriers.

    • @Amani-zo8ic
      @Amani-zo8ic 4 роки тому +5

      Reck Yourself ya

    • @lastwolflord
      @lastwolflord 4 роки тому +14

      @@AC-gb7do In Asian countries they like being able to live a life then fight back. It''s Why China is the way it is. Right now they put up with it. And aren't ready to resit. In NK they couldn't even begin to resit. China wont help them. They get NK slaves in exchange for supplies. Literally, not joking on that.

  • @Chumpkin1324
    @Chumpkin1324 3 роки тому +727

    Bruh what’s up with the misleading picture of them saying “america is fucking easy”? These guys were chill.

  • @cameroncurrie7208
    @cameroncurrie7208 11 місяців тому +1

    Problem is it's not 1950.. those reserves have old riffles or sticks. That won't cut it nowadays.

  • @bmohr9826
    @bmohr9826 10 місяців тому

    I laughed at the “US only has 1,056 missiles” 😂

  • @judycasley108
    @judycasley108 3 роки тому +436

    If Kim Jong Un is so obsessed with military strength, why doesn’t he invest in feeding the troops and providing better uniforms and equipment ?

    • @FireDramine7
      @FireDramine7 3 роки тому +105

      weak economy. And parades are more important

    • @coolenick0
      @coolenick0 3 роки тому +144

      Because the man has been dead for almost 10 years by now. It's Kim Jong Un now

    • @vociferonheraldofthewinter2284
      @vociferonheraldofthewinter2284 3 роки тому +28

      They don't have any money. Or food to buy.

    • @originalfiremancancelled7303
      @originalfiremancancelled7303 3 роки тому +13

      Actually he's dead but his crazy sister who is way more evil than him or her father or her grandfather ever was

    • @zwickzack
      @zwickzack 3 роки тому +43

      They're giving way too much credit to the North Korean Military. You are correct, they have no food, no money, and are using equipment and "technology" from the 1940's-1970's. They would be obliterated off the face of the planet in about 4 hours if we wanted them to be, and there's nothing they can do about it. Military strength is just more propaganda for their poor, brainwashed, oppressed people.

  • @jonahruiz4101
    @jonahruiz4101 4 роки тому +160

    A large portion of military strength isn’t just the numbers. But the quality of firearms, personnel, and technology.

    • @unlimited971
      @unlimited971 4 роки тому +12

      the nk naval force is numerous, but without even a destroyer, most of its fregate will be destroyed. it's even more true if the us has air superiority

    • @snowyvert
      @snowyvert 4 роки тому +12

      well, NK doesn't have any good tech. lmao everything they have is from the 50s.

    • @williamhadley1580
      @williamhadley1580 4 роки тому +8

      @larueleroux They're also not taking into account the number of retired American soldiers who basically all own their own firearms and train regularly, for fun.

    • @mikaelwojciechowski7281
      @mikaelwojciechowski7281 4 роки тому +12

      Sure, the NK infantry may pose a bit of a threat to the US infantry forces, due to their shear number alone. However, with air support, artillery aid, etc. the US would wipe the NK Army off the map. It would be one of the worst massacres in history I believe.
      Infantry force vs. infantry force, it would most likely be very bloody on both sides - but with all the branches fighting as a single unit, this hyopthetical war would be like the Grand Army of the Republic (Star Wars) fighting Medeival knights on horses, armed with swords and lances.

    • @snowyvert
      @snowyvert 4 роки тому

      @@mikaelwojciechowski7281 agreed 👌

  • @oscaradeaza1203
    @oscaradeaza1203 8 місяців тому

    “Same to Japan, same to North Korea.”
    -WTF- 💥💥💥(MUWAHAHAAHA!)

  • @brothermaleuspraetor9505
    @brothermaleuspraetor9505 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for flashing the subtitles across the screen for a split second for me to try to read them, thanks. Really appreciate it.

  • @214lex2
    @214lex2 3 роки тому +398

    Yea dont know bout that man, the whole U.S has citizens armed lol

    • @PrussianPanzer1939
      @PrussianPanzer1939 3 роки тому +4

      I agree

    • @ghuttsmckenzie4269
      @ghuttsmckenzie4269 3 роки тому +5

      Best to guess peoples got heat in the US.

    • @JoePhillips1983
      @JoePhillips1983 3 роки тому +33

      Someone once said you can't invade America because behind every blade of grass is a civilian with a gun

    • @kobecarnes4865
      @kobecarnes4865 3 роки тому +6

      Plus in a time if we went to war so many more people would be signing up to fight for our country

    • @nocount7517
      @nocount7517 3 роки тому +1

      Firearm ownership in the US is like 110% or some crazy number.

  • @AdrianMartinez-gq7ne
    @AdrianMartinez-gq7ne 3 роки тому +203

    They talk about how the KPA has a strong navy and I'm just like, bro, THEY HAVE NO CARRIERS.

    • @kmoss9521
      @kmoss9521 3 роки тому +17

      And they have a bunch of corvettes and. I was like “those don’t work real good in water!” Lol

    • @crimzonpegasus9714
      @crimzonpegasus9714 3 роки тому +18

      NK propaganda probably doesn't even tell them what aircraft carriers are. And if they do, I bet propaganda only tells them that Russia and China have the only carriers

    • @ghosthunter0404
      @ghosthunter0404 3 роки тому +3

      Lol there little ship versus a nuclear powered carrier that would probably fire 1 round and annihilate it

    • @MrDgwphotos
      @MrDgwphotos 3 роки тому +6

      US Naval Aviation is the second largest air arm in the world, behind the USAF, and there is a LOT of skill involved in being a Naval Aviator. There's a reason Navy pilots wear wings of gold. Also, the subs North Korea has, are all virtually obsolete. Numbers are next to nothing when your equipment is obsolete. US Navy ASW tactics would be all over them before they could fire a shot. Even against the Soviets, our ASW forces were top dog.

    • @CleanupKrew7
      @CleanupKrew7 3 роки тому +1

      @@ghosthunter0404Those Carriers aren't as invincible as everyone thinks. the US has neglected it's anti submarine capabilities since the fall of the Soviet Union. All it takes is for one sub to slip past the carrier groups defense screen and that super carrier is gone.

  • @andyb2028
    @andyb2028 2 роки тому +2

    The naval comparison didn't include aircraft carriers lol

  • @salty7056
    @salty7056 11 місяців тому

    Music is unnecessary and prevents hearing sometimes. You guys are very interesting to hear and don't need music as backup.

  • @thedyslexicorangutan8049
    @thedyslexicorangutan8049 4 роки тому +372

    That “latest US weapon” is an AA-12. It’s 40 years old. It’s also Russian

    • @Harfalth
      @Harfalth 4 роки тому +8

      Thank you! Came to the comments looking for this...smh

    • @thegooseisin6910
      @thegooseisin6910 3 роки тому +52

      You were correct on the old but not on the Russian part. It was created by Maxwell Atchisson an American engineer. And if you are talking about the FPSRussia video he is also American not Russian.

    • @devinthierault
      @devinthierault 3 роки тому +21

      Idiot. AA12 was designed in the 70s by an American and first adapted for use by South Korea by Daewoo as thr USAS12 but is 100 percent American!

    • @Jeff55369
      @Jeff55369 3 роки тому +7

      @@devinthierault calling someone an idiot is uncalled for. Everyone will be wrong about various things in their lives so it's best to be understanding so one day in the future when you're wrong, people will also have understanding and not ridicule you. :)

    • @drownsinkoolaid4203
      @drownsinkoolaid4203 3 роки тому +2

      @@devinthierault I learned something, had no idea the USAS came from the AA12! Weird, I'm a huge fan of both but never paid attention to that for some reason.

  • @MrSniffy
    @MrSniffy 4 роки тому +414

    North Korea's secret weapon:
    Korean soldier rockstar

    • @PckxDD
      @PckxDD 4 роки тому

      Bruhhhh

    • @dantheslayer1023
      @dantheslayer1023 4 роки тому +1

      Nah its Kim vomit itself..all those burgers steak projectile would be destructive af

    • @th3mllkm4n66
      @th3mllkm4n66 4 роки тому

      Therapist: Korean Soldier Rockstar can’t hurt you, he doesn’t exist. Korean Soldier Rockstar:

    • @Slick1G3
      @Slick1G3 3 роки тому

      lol secret weapon

  • @defxed
    @defxed Рік тому +1

    You should show them a video that, demonstrates how outclassed their vehicles of warfare are. The conversations about tanks....they need to be educated on that Abram tank

  • @Jezidka
    @Jezidka 2 роки тому +1

    *The USA has a lot of pride, but we also are willing to fight for our FREEDOM and from being controlled by tyranny. We do not like being taken advantage of, but we dont like when another country are being bullied, we wish other countries would take back their own freedom. USA has many allies because we come when we are asked.* Now we have foreigners who want to be a real American, but then we have people who were born in America and they are taught to hate their own country from past mistakes. We can never grow unless we put the past behind us and learn to not live in bitterness and hate. America became 1 nation because we believe in brotherhood and sisterhood.

    • @carioquensi6394
      @carioquensi6394 2 роки тому

      You forgot to tell them that we also lowered our interest in other nations like Europe has concern in Facebook 😎.
      But we will be there if call like you said 🤣🤣.

  • @martinjuniorbalbihurtado9599
    @martinjuniorbalbihurtado9599 3 роки тому +278

    N.Korea has 7.5million total personnel
    A-10 Warthog: So, you have chosen death

    • @alexander5207
      @alexander5207 3 роки тому +14

      brrrrrrrrrrrt

    • @b-chroniumproductions3177
      @b-chroniumproductions3177 3 роки тому +11

      The US Air Force has admitted that in any war situation, the entire A-10 fleet would be grounded within 3 days due to vulnerability to fighters.

    • @drakashrakenburgproduction5369
      @drakashrakenburgproduction5369 3 роки тому +11

      @@b-chroniumproductions3177 That's not the only devastating weapon the U.S. Air Force has...

    • @b-chroniumproductions3177
      @b-chroniumproductions3177 3 роки тому +3

      @@drakashrakenburgproduction5369 I'm aware.

    • @tatakae3773
      @tatakae3773 3 роки тому +15

      @@b-chroniumproductions3177 AC-130 Gunship: Aight hold my beer

  • @sonorangaming449
    @sonorangaming449 3 роки тому +467

    "Latest US weapon"
    *Shows AA-12, invented in 1972*

    • @pancake4061
      @pancake4061 3 роки тому +58

      "Latest US Tank"
      Shows shit that we won't be using for years, if ever.

    • @assaulthetz380
      @assaulthetz380 3 роки тому +25

      @@pancake4061 There are 'US' tank that are modified to be 'modern' just using their old chassy.
      But yeah, US is not using Pattons or Pershings anymore.

    • @pancake4061
      @pancake4061 3 роки тому +6

      @@assaulthetz380 No, I'm saying they showed some fringe, unproven and unused tank that never has been in our arsenal. We've been using the Abrams almost exclusively for at least 40 years.

    • @assaulthetz380
      @assaulthetz380 3 роки тому +1

      @@pancake4061 I know, what i meant was not the 'US' using them, but other nations converting old chassy from the former Old US medium tanks (Now called old MBTs) strapping reactive armor on them or using the old M48 Patton's chassis as new variants of AFVs like the ASCODs or Ajax.
      So it is 'used' but indirectly and actually proven useful (Like the Sabra converted MBTs)

    • @pancake4061
      @pancake4061 3 роки тому +3

      @@assaulthetz380 What does that have to do with literally anything

  • @joetrolo7076
    @joetrolo7076 8 місяців тому +1

    I'd like to see their reaction to our aircraft carriers, I was surprised they weren't mentioned

  • @imkranlopez5426
    @imkranlopez5426 9 місяців тому +1

    I haven't seen anyone mention the lack of battleships and carriers in the Navy category. Those are BIG TIME force multipliers.

  • @elnessify
    @elnessify 4 роки тому +302

    As children in the US we aren’t even aware that NK exists, (other than the Korean War aka the forgotten war) I find it strangely amusing that NK children are taught to hate the US
    As adults in the US we become aware of the atrocities inflicted on the NK people by they’re own government and find it hard to believe that such horrors are still happening
    The moment the NK people wake up I am almost certain that the US will be there for them, I know it’s easier said than done a revolution is what fat boy fears the most

    • @joeg5414
      @joeg5414 4 роки тому +19

      Don't assume that because you weren't taught anything that it was the same for everyone. I learned a lot about NK when I was a kid.

    • @MS-xu5vx
      @MS-xu5vx 4 роки тому +15

      Some mid & high schools do teach it and most of the major wars that happen in US history.

    • @w.colonialboy9144
      @w.colonialboy9144 4 роки тому +18

      I don't think the OP was trying to belittle Americans regarding the schools here. Calm down

    • @MS-xu5vx
      @MS-xu5vx 4 роки тому +11

      @@w.colonialboy9144 I wasn't bashing the OP or raging about it, just letting people know there are kids in the US that are taught about wars fought and about NK.

    • @brad8476
      @brad8476 4 роки тому +2

      @@MS-xu5vx ya I also wasn't taught about the north korean war in school, Learned about it after.

  • @TheGankednoob
    @TheGankednoob 3 роки тому +365

    North Korea: Submarine Units have less malnutrition.
    USA: How do I lose 20lbs to pass a tape test?

    • @nodishtoodeep3053
      @nodishtoodeep3053 3 роки тому +19

      I think the US navy is the fattest branch of any military in the world.

    • @TheGankednoob
      @TheGankednoob 3 роки тому +44

      @@nodishtoodeep3053 Sir, Those are flotation muscles, Sir!

    • @stonebearfist2710
      @stonebearfist2710 3 роки тому +5

      Just gotta lose 4 pounds for the army.

    • @siri1805
      @siri1805 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheGankednoob As a swimmer, agreed. Flab promotes float

    • @HB-dg5op
      @HB-dg5op 3 роки тому

      🤣

  • @chrisward2123
    @chrisward2123 10 місяців тому +1

    Your navy list didn't count cruisers and carriers. We have so few corvettes because those aren't meant for deep sea action those are more shoreline ships and we tend to use those in the coast guard. The destroyers we have would take them down with ease not even adding the cruisers.

  • @powerpace1
    @powerpace1 6 місяців тому +1

    North Korean soldiers will crap their pants and run across the border. Low on food and high on punishment isn't a good combination

  • @Misaki11111
    @Misaki11111 3 роки тому +337

    To be fair, this herb collector soldier escaped NK. That’s brave and not just anybody can do, not even the toughest guys in the military.

    • @thegreygamers8440
      @thegreygamers8440 3 роки тому +28

      I'll give you that thats brave. But kids have done it. And they also are undereducated on americas military might. Probably downplayed so the NK soldiers didn't realize it would be like Mike Tyson fighting a 4 year old

    • @LordBaca
      @LordBaca 3 роки тому +19

      “I think I saw some coriander by that wall over there. I’ll be right back”

    • @bloodlustzombie
      @bloodlustzombie 3 роки тому +13

      The DMZ is a dead zone. How they got over is a miracle.

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban 3 роки тому +8

      Bigsandwich1 these defector vids never talk about how their families are sent to the Korean gulag because their kids defected.

    • @scottdiehl6087
      @scottdiehl6087 3 роки тому

      He needs to get a bit more educated before he starts talking in such a manner.

  • @iplayvarsitygolf9592
    @iplayvarsitygolf9592 3 роки тому +571

    “North Korea navy is strong”
    who’s gonna tell him?

    • @CuSolais
      @CuSolais 3 роки тому +104

      they dont have oil to even run their tanks. i think they in the knew.

    • @jacobguthrie4982
      @jacobguthrie4982 3 роки тому +21

      No it’s not strong North Korea ain’t even a super power that’s like say North Korea has a stronger navy the Russia or China North Korea can’t even touch America

    • @ImBobruss
      @ImBobruss 3 роки тому +53

      @@jacobguthrie4982 that was the point of the original comment bro...

    • @patthonsirilim5739
      @patthonsirilim5739 3 роки тому +44

      im not sure if they know that the submarine the north korean used are not really the same as the one the us use and the 400 somthing ships north korea are pretty much oversize glorified patrol boats a good number of which i really doubt actully works

    • @Marthyboy88
      @Marthyboy88 3 роки тому +23

      @@patthonsirilim5739 They're repurposed fishing boats...

  • @thecultofjohnnydelr.soulsw7010
    @thecultofjohnnydelr.soulsw7010 3 роки тому

    Crazy 😜 feckers, I'm sharing this with my good friend Kim Jung Un 😉

  • @stacypollock9289
    @stacypollock9289 2 роки тому +1

    There's an old saying...
    "Never bring a knife to a gun fight."
    The American Indian can vouch for this, and you should too.

  • @tomdalsin5175
    @tomdalsin5175 3 роки тому +88

    Every NK defector I've ever seen or heard... they all have one thing in common - they've been through immense hardship.
    That appears to instill them with one other common trait - they're appreciative and thus warm-hearted.

    • @tomdalsin5175
      @tomdalsin5175 3 роки тому +5

      @Lauren Fazenbaker I've heard from an NK defector that NK is effectively a concentration camp pretending to be a country. The owner of that concentration camp is the CCP (China). They use NK as a sort of "farm" for Human trafficking, and as a political sock puppet to gain leverage in international dealings.
      How much truth there is to these claims, I don't know... but I'm confident that it's at least partially true. There is plenty of supporting evidence out in the open: follow the money, and look at all the cases of NK girls being shipped to China.
      The more I think about it, the more violently my stomach turns. After WW2 people said "never again" and here it's been happening for decades while our leaders pretend not to notice.

  • @Guitarnivore
    @Guitarnivore 4 роки тому +252

    When they say "Rocket", I imagine they are referring to missiles of one sort or another, maybe? And if NK has 5,000, I think the 1.056 (note the decimal and not the comma) on the U.S. side is 1.056 million.

    • @Sweedster
      @Sweedster 3 роки тому +24

      I was gonna say, those numbers didn’t add up

    • @kmoss9521
      @kmoss9521 3 роки тому +8

      That was hilarious

    • @christopherfisher128
      @christopherfisher128 3 роки тому +8

      No, I think they meant actual rockets like the HIMARS. They are short-range and very small compared to missiles.

    • @trappytrap9103
      @trappytrap9103 3 роки тому +1

      @@christopherfisher128 it is MLRS which is called 방사포 in north korea they r all Soviet made ones like Katyusha

    • @christopherfisher128
      @christopherfisher128 3 роки тому

      @@trappytrap9103 Are you referring to Korean rockets or the US M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)?

  • @michaelpenney8703
    @michaelpenney8703 3 роки тому

    Very cool guys, thank you.

  • @ronaldwestbeal2269
    @ronaldwestbeal2269 6 місяців тому +2

    once i saw the naval section and saw north korea didnt have any destroyer class that was surprising lol im sure thats like a fairly huge deal in a naval battle

  • @beachesandhose2374
    @beachesandhose2374 4 роки тому +284

    Was hoping to see the M1 Abrams, F-35, F-22, A-10 Warthog, the aircraft carriers, and a lot more stuff.

    • @todwod
      @todwod 4 роки тому +5

      Right! I was waiting for the USS George Washington 😅

    • @7ylerD
      @7ylerD 4 роки тому +2

      Isn’t the Warthog from Halo? Lol

    • @SpecOps140
      @SpecOps140 4 роки тому +20

      @@7ylerD A-10 Warthog most commonly known as
      Bbbbrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrttttttttttttttt!

    • @danielcha4658
      @danielcha4658 4 роки тому +14

      Tyler D warthog is an nickname for the A-10 thunderbolt II, an air to ground attack aircraft designed for CAS(close air support)

    • @SpecOps140
      @SpecOps140 4 роки тому +12

      I hate that they showed a damn USAS-12 as "advanced". That's equivalent to showing a musket and calling it modern

  • @accurategamer7085
    @accurategamer7085 3 роки тому +383

    You forgot the 100mil+ citizens with second amendment in reserve.

    • @christianthe2994
      @christianthe2994 3 роки тому +38

      Even though the US military has less personnel the US civilians alone will take done there whole army with AR15s

    • @jotegg1276
      @jotegg1276 3 роки тому +8

      That wouldnt get off its ass to help anyone unless it can to there door step first... dont kid yourself... by then its called an invasion.

    • @boogaloo_weed
      @boogaloo_weed 3 роки тому +16

      not even, if you think there wouldn’t be american militias going on boats and planes to fight the commies you’re dead wrong

    • @kingwolf9447
      @kingwolf9447 3 роки тому +8

      And the US allies in Asia,South Korea and Japan.
      Japan is pretty powerful in military development,they could probably take on Korea.

    • @Serai3
      @Serai3 3 роки тому

      You mean the potential and/or actual traitors? Yeah, let's not forget them.

  • @ScotlandProfessional
    @ScotlandProfessional 2 роки тому +1

    Don't forget, the US has 11 nuclear powered super carriers. North Korea has no carriers at all.

  • @yesyes-om1po
    @yesyes-om1po Рік тому

    2:10, I think it might just be a typo, it says 1.056 while NK one says 5,000 meaning they could be meaning to say 1.056 million instead of 1,056

  • @theimmortal4718
    @theimmortal4718 3 роки тому +198

    The USS Pueblo is a huge ship?
    It has a crew of 76 men.
    That's not huge. And it was unarmed

    • @danielaghayani9723
      @danielaghayani9723 3 роки тому +19

      lmfaooooooooo im dead

    • @CDSAfghan
      @CDSAfghan 3 роки тому +30

      Come on let them have one win. I mean they saw that ship and thought "big" now pull up in a Ford class super carrier.

    • @evanw2195
      @evanw2195 3 роки тому +24

      I thought it was a tug boat when I saw a picture of it, probably only about 100ft in length, and north Korea’s claims that’s it honor right there taking the huge warship

    • @orangecat3021
      @orangecat3021 3 роки тому +6

      I am Big Brain it’s more of a support ship with some intelligence on board

    • @blankmoment2
      @blankmoment2 3 роки тому +3

      Man its all like the Japanese when the black ship arrived all again

  • @starwarsloremaster6777
    @starwarsloremaster6777 3 роки тому +301

    What they don’t realize is 1 us ship is like 50 North Korean ones 😭😭

    • @override367
      @override367 3 роки тому +54

      I think that might even be generous, the technological disparity is so great that the entire North Korean surface fleet would be destroyed without even fixing a position on any American ships

    • @The23Anonymous
      @The23Anonymous 3 роки тому +24

      I think one carrier group might be enough to take on their whole country

    • @theurbangoose9358
      @theurbangoose9358 3 роки тому +22

      Same with their tanks the 105 isn't going to dent the Abrams

    • @rivernumber227
      @rivernumber227 3 роки тому +16

      @@theurbangoose9358 *isnot even going to scratch the paint*

    • @isbpbmugb2ygaglzigv5zxmgcm92
      @isbpbmugb2ygaglzigv5zxmgcm92 3 роки тому +3

      @@theurbangoose9358 the abrams is the best tank rn

  • @55tristin55
    @55tristin55 2 роки тому +3

    "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts. There is going to be damage on both sides so war shouldn't be an option."
    What an amazing quote. Its just sad to see (ex) North Korean soldiers with more concern for life than some of the most powerful people on earth (I'm looking at you Putler).

  • @q7272
    @q7272 4 роки тому +311

    This is interesting. They don’t seem to have a concept of the difference of the quality of the forces

    • @kinmanred6768
      @kinmanred6768 4 роки тому +42

      well yeah but you also gotta realize that they probably never really seen an actual US solider or the training they go through to them its more about numbers although NK has more troops and stuff than US the US has More well trained better troops like if you ever heard of stories of US army in action a group of 6 US Soldiers or less are known to take down whole groups 10x bigger than them and even whole armies while US focuses in quality NK cares more about Nuclear bombs and bombs in general NK gives no fucks about quality the NK knows this its why they focus more on bombs because that's the only way they would win against the US but then again they still have no chance the US has more than just the army and Navy and air force there's specially trained secret groups in the army special forces that are literally trained to more deadly and better than the army itself and also trained to know how to take down a government from the inside so if anything the war would end before it even started the moment it starts those forces would have already penetrated through the government and probably have Kim Jon dead while also making sure not a single Nuke is even launched the only thing they have to worry about after that is the other Officals and people who are still in control of the NK army and that wont last long either Kim Jon only cares about his power in NK he knows he has no chance against the US or any nation all he could do is make the NK people hate the US in hopes to keep control and keep them from escaping Kim knows he's weak.

    • @RAD6150
      @RAD6150 4 роки тому +39

      Exactly. 10 old tanks charging at one new tank will be destroyed by the newer one before they can even get in range to shoot. Their old diesel subs are also outclassed exponentially by newer hunter-killers.

    • @josepalacios202
      @josepalacios202 4 роки тому +26

      it's like in video games where the noob thinks his 1 billion man army will win but their basically starved civilians with guns, compared to 100k highly trained soldiers with high tech weapons, maximized for efficiency and well-fed troops. Also, who to say NK gear even works?

    • @kinmanred6768
      @kinmanred6768 4 роки тому +6

      @Alex Woodward lol yeah that was pretty funny its why even if they do have lots of aircraft and tanks and a navy they have no fuel and again kim doesn't believe in his own soldiers either he only uses them to keep power in his own country its why the man spends most of his money on explosives and rockets cause that the only way he's gonna survive its why the man has really nice and advanced rockets when there's a purade and he's showing off all his rockets and all the troops have like world war 2 and Vietnam and even cold war weapons old ass looking old model AKs because lord knows he cant afford to actually give his own troops good supplies for combat but he's wiling to spend billions on fucking modern ass rockets and use them as a scare tactic to get his way.

    • @ubon11
      @ubon11 4 роки тому +12

      They are both completely and utterly misinformed. The US would destroy North Korea very quickly, but war will never happen. Seoul is too close to the border and there are thousands upon thousands of artillery shells just waiting to rain down on South Korea at a moment’s notice. So if the US ever did attack, hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, in Seoul would be killed and/or injured. Basically, this is North Korea’s insurance policy. Conversely, North Korea also understands that there is a red line that they can’t cross or they will be annihilated. Sinking ships way out in the ocean and shelling outlier islands don’t cross that line. But a land invasion over the DMZ, or shelling Seoul, are absolute red line actions that would lead to war. Both sides understand the game and both sides will never go too far. After all, it’s been 70 years. There will never be another Korean War.

  • @ArchangelExile
    @ArchangelExile 3 роки тому +433

    "No matter how small a needle is, it still hurts."
    I like that.

    • @plugshirt1684
      @plugshirt1684 3 роки тому +32

      Yeah no one doubts that America would easily win a war with North Korea but any war is still going to cost lives

    • @BloodofHeroes
      @BloodofHeroes 3 роки тому +2

      Except the fact I have stepped on needles as a kid and pulled it from my foot on my own and continued to go on my day with little worry.

    • @watercooledpc912
      @watercooledpc912 3 роки тому +22

      @@BloodofHeroes EXCEPT the fact You Screamed in pain and agony on the Floor for sometime too

    • @allenmaring1504
      @allenmaring1504 3 роки тому +2

      My x would disagree with this lol

    • @guarddog318
      @guarddog318 3 роки тому

      I have a large tattoo on each shoulder, plus have had a procedure called a "Nerve conduction study". ( Docs stick a big ass needle in one end of an arm or leg, and another at the far end. Then they shoot a current through it to see how well the nerves conduct signals. )
      I had a hard time staying awake for the tattoos, and found the N.C.S. actually helped kill some of the nerve pain I had been dealing with.
      Oh, and I've also had more stitches than a sack full of baseballs, thanks to motorcycle and car wrecks.
      So... when it comes to needles, I'm apparently immune to pain. Also, my screwed-up nervous system makes me rather immune to Tasers as well. lol

  • @TheBooklyBreakdown
    @TheBooklyBreakdown Рік тому +1

    I died laughing when they reacted to the meme

  • @GrandmaLoves2Scuba
    @GrandmaLoves2Scuba 2 роки тому

    The bravery to defect! Welcome to freedom and the real world brothers! I love this channel🤗

  • @ian.gomez_
    @ian.gomez_ 3 роки тому +300

    Why weren’t the almost 20 nuclear aircraft carriers on America’s list lol even one aircraft carrier can heavily shift leverage in a battle.

    • @atk4tw671
      @atk4tw671 3 роки тому +12

      11 carriers with near unlimited range and the 450+ best naval craft on the planet, also 3,500+ carrier borne aircraft

    • @andrew9868
      @andrew9868 3 роки тому +5

      Lol also said we only have 20 payroll boats. Like what?

    • @justaperson3910
      @justaperson3910 3 роки тому +2

      Wait, we have 20!?

    • @ian.gomez_
      @ian.gomez_ 3 роки тому +3

      Just A Person around 10 in service and about 10 under construction

    • @zacharysnyder2925
      @zacharysnyder2925 3 роки тому +3

      @@justaperson3910 I'm 10 in construction are the Gerald Ford Class, If I'm not mistaken most if not all of the previous generation will be disbanded and replaced with purely new gen carriers.

  • @Seastallion
    @Seastallion 3 роки тому +129

    I couldn't help but notice that the US Aircraft Carriers were left out of the naval comparison... also the fact that all US submarines are nuclear powered, rather than diesel fueled.

    • @Seastallion
      @Seastallion 3 роки тому +21

      @Elysian Astrum
      Possibly. Including the Helicopter Carriers, the US has about 20 Aircraft Carriers, about 10x's as many as any other individual country. Plus the Super Carriers are all nuclear powered with unlimited range. Also all of the US aircraft are top of the line and the most advanced in the world. Countries like NK are using outdated equipment, Army, Air Force, AND Navy. They technically have more submarines, but just one US Sub could wreak havoc on the entire NK Sub fleet. NK is outclassed by the US in almost every measurable way. So yeah, it could come as a shock.

    • @dominicflores8603
      @dominicflores8603 3 роки тому +6

      Also the “Pueblo incident” happened in 1968 and the ship which was commissioned in 1945 was a research ship and it’s armament was just 2x .50 cal. machine guns, compare that to our ships of today. Big difference.

    • @dragonhearted7761
      @dragonhearted7761 3 роки тому +1

      @@dominicflores8603 they wouldve been sexually assaulted no doubt

    • @steves578
      @steves578 3 роки тому +2

      @@dragonhearted7761 Sexually assaulted? nah man, just call it how it is... Its straight rape.. that is what a naval war with Nk would look like... the U.S just having its way with them..

    • @Seastallion
      @Seastallion 3 роки тому

      @Mercb3ast
      Even if there were any truth to what you say (it's rather dubious), it doesn't apply to NK's submarine fleet. They are basically out of date clunkers that wouldn't stand a chance going up against the likes of a Seawolf.

  • @denaliguidesummit7029
    @denaliguidesummit7029 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for sharing with us. Soldiers are the same, but their info, training, support, weapons can vary
    I was in Active Duty when the PUEBLO incident happened. The PUEBLO was captured by ambush of
    three NK Gunboats, and in the icy seas the covers made the deck guns inoperable. Had a submarine been involved
    the Commander Lloyd Bucher would have made sure it was sunk, not captured. It was quite a drama, and honestly the USA seems to have lost other INTEL Vessels like the LIBERTY.
    Best to you soldiers, thank you for coming to and sharing with us. All the Best to you.

  • @runningtherealms8339
    @runningtherealms8339 Рік тому

    "you *nearly* get paid" lol

  • @lordumas
    @lordumas 4 роки тому +76

    USA: The most technologically advanced military on the planet!
    North Korea: The military with the most slaps on the planet!

  • @jamesmeadrs9309
    @jamesmeadrs9309 3 роки тому +156

    I served in South Korea in 1995. I’m glad you guys got out and hope you’re enjoying a good life.

  • @elvarg65
    @elvarg65 11 місяців тому

    You guys crack my ass up! Peace ! From Michigan ….

  • @bobsandt9009
    @bobsandt9009 2 роки тому

    We could take out North Korea with left overs from lunch . lol 😆 🤣 😂

  • @geraldkiing1904
    @geraldkiing1904 4 роки тому +200

    American citizens: *laugh in Second Amendment*

    • @robking2832
      @robking2832 3 роки тому +3

      Underrated comment 🤧

    • @bolddiggitygaming191
      @bolddiggitygaming191 3 роки тому +2

      They acting like a coalition force of Iowa, Illinois and Texas could single handedly take out they whole country and turn it into a democracy

    • @harveyknguyen
      @harveyknguyen 3 роки тому

      @@bolddiggitygaming191 if anything we'd probably turn it into a pro-west dictatorship

    • @thelegalmexican9860
      @thelegalmexican9860 3 роки тому +3

      @Mercb3ast have you seen the NK army’s common equipment??? It’s just like a civilian with a gun, most of gun owners have level 1-2 body armor and a small arsenal

    • @Trashmagic_girl
      @Trashmagic_girl 3 роки тому +1

      @Mercb3ast Chill dude, it’s this little thing called a J O K E it’s really not that deep

  • @edlenorgaeron8003
    @edlenorgaeron8003 3 роки тому +298

    "Nearly get paid."
    Sounds like "nearly get laid", but harsher.

    • @Rhov9
      @Rhov9 3 роки тому +5

      I had to pause when he said he had only made like $0.08 from his army “career”. What that government is doing to their own citizens, their own SOLDIERS is an atrocity.

    • @Averagepoetrylover
      @Averagepoetrylover 3 роки тому +2

      @@Rhov9 The ironic fact is that they still think there country is great. Even though hundreds of there own citzens die from starvation.

    • @ServantofBaal
      @ServantofBaal 3 роки тому +1

      @@Averagepoetrylover The people in charge are quite knowledgeable about the state of their country. They're the ones creating the ruse, and they know the moment their citizens find out their government has been fucking them over and that they're so weak, they'd overthrow them in an instant.

    • @DA7545
      @DA7545 3 роки тому +2

      @@Averagepoetrylover Those are the people they don't want and the few good apples that get caught in the mix? - it is what it is.
      This is what Biden, Berni , AOC and Hillary want for America. Vote trump if you want us to have a military that can protect us.
      So, I'm hearing NK wants us. Biden gets in, Military funding shut down, Open borders, free healthcare and education for illegals, Phase out fossil fuels making us dependent on foreign oil. We will get weak and if China doesn't get us first, N. Korea will.

    • @Averagepoetrylover
      @Averagepoetrylover 3 роки тому

      @@DA7545 ok

  • @mr.pompodill1485
    @mr.pompodill1485 7 місяців тому

    "Okay, fellas. We take one of the most devastating weapons on the market, the shotgun, and make it automatic." 'Merica, baybeeee!

  • @barbarapatterson4132
    @barbarapatterson4132 3 роки тому +1

    These boys need a education in what American citizens are capable of doing in an invasion on our ground.

  • @luoravetla
    @luoravetla 3 роки тому +305

    “The latest US weapon”
    *shows gun developed in the 70s*

    • @luoravetla
      @luoravetla 3 роки тому +20

      @Christian Ruiz both have evolved significantly, but the AA12 has kept the same design (besides extremely minor tweaks)
      However the AA12 is a fucking beautiful FAS.

    • @luoravetla
      @luoravetla 3 роки тому +2

      @Christian Ruiz True but it still has variants used. I get your point and don't really wish to debate as I also agree with you. My point is that most of the reliable equipment from WWII still used today has mostly been altered significantly, for example 1911 has many variants made by many companies, for example the M1911A1 has a much lighter trigger compared to the 1911 of WWII.

    • @ianwalkerjewboy658
      @ianwalkerjewboy658 3 роки тому

      @Christian Ruiz the 1911 hasn’t been standard issue for a while actually, I believe at a certain level you can choose to carry one

    • @johnherbold6539
      @johnherbold6539 3 роки тому +6

      They should’ve showed the new 6.8mm carbines

    • @stevenparent7886
      @stevenparent7886 3 роки тому +2

      The AA-12 is a beast, old guns will kill you as dead as a new gun will.