Stuart Hall's Encoding Decoding Model of Communication: In Depth Explanation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @ShammyCam
    @ShammyCam 3 роки тому +52

    Thanks for this. Halls texts are so dense and difficult to decode. Kind of ironic actually

    • @kaptno-town2589
      @kaptno-town2589 3 роки тому

      Not all of them, but this one in particular. I found his work on representation a pretty nice read. =)

  • @hendricka3029
    @hendricka3029 4 роки тому +7

    Ive just read Halls text and was confused by some parts, you excellently explained everything in that presentation and could also lift the veil of confusion !

  • @Emily-bm9xj
    @Emily-bm9xj 6 місяців тому

    Thank you for your amazing channel. Love the references and connections you bring together and for breaking things down and making things very accessible

  • @canchen5028
    @canchen5028 4 роки тому +3

    very helpful to me as an international postgraduate student .......

  • @nandakathu937
    @nandakathu937 5 років тому +7

    This was very helpful for me as a postgraduate student

  • @mariannelesigne
    @mariannelesigne 2 роки тому +2

    This helps tons, thank you for taking the time to make this video!

  • @yarayounis8648
    @yarayounis8648 4 роки тому +7

    Bless you! Thank you so much. Helped me understand it so clearly!

  • @user-cn6vr6wm7m
    @user-cn6vr6wm7m 5 років тому +12

    You helped me so much!!! GOD BLESS YOUUU...AND PLEASE CONTINUE✅

  • @sarahscity
    @sarahscity 5 років тому

    Hi! What's the reference for the point "Meanings of messages are assumed to be distortion-free and universally transferable"? Is it from Stuart Hall (1977)? I'm hoping to use this point in my essay. Your prompt reply will be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

  • @joshmaddox2010
    @joshmaddox2010 4 роки тому +1

    This will help me on my second abstract.

  • @miguelcabezashametti5869
    @miguelcabezashametti5869 4 роки тому +1

    thank you! it was very clear

  • @im.ballerinarose
    @im.ballerinarose 4 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @567anty
    @567anty 5 років тому +1

    great vid

  • @babloojatav2663
    @babloojatav2663 5 років тому

    Thanks man

  • @jaspalsingh-mt7je
    @jaspalsingh-mt7je 5 років тому

    nyc explanation sir carry onn

  • @JuanBGonzalez
    @JuanBGonzalez 3 роки тому +1

    POV: you are watching this video for your WGST 3020 class

    • @nadiaishimwe3663
      @nadiaishimwe3663 2 роки тому +2

      lol im in this class this semester, this text was so effing dense at least to me 😭

  • @gda295
    @gda295 3 роки тому

    9:11

  • @ceesjanmol
    @ceesjanmol Рік тому

    Your explanation on Barthes and myth is difficult to follow.
    You illustrate his approach to myth, by highlighting a picture. Logically, myths and pictures wild not appear to be the same things. Further clarification, addressing the 'proud salute of the soldier' by not telling the audience what exactly is mutual Scott this picture and further confusing the viewer with the picture not actually depicting a soldier by a child, really begs the question as to how you would think this explanation could be logical to anyone?

  • @imjonathan6745
    @imjonathan6745 Місяць тому

    what is bro yapping about?