Flight of the Intruder (1991) - Best Scene - This is the top Vietnam War movie.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Flight of the Intruder (1991) - Best Scene - This is the top Vietnam War movie. The U.S. military was bombarded by fierce anti-aircraft firepower, and the whole process was full of enthusiasm.
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
You know, I'm something of an A6 bombardier myself
Can you send a friend request
Under rated comment
Tricycle Landing Gear & Arresting Hook ?
Gyroscopic Sight ? Chaff.? The ability to Carry Large Loads internally??😭🤣😂🤣🤣
Fighter jocks make movies. Bomber pilots make history!
Hey, there B/N how’s life treating you? I was a PR with VA 95 CAG11 CVN65 I know A6 very well I helped in the movie and my squadron is a part of a movie to
Фосфорными бомбами продвигали псевдодемократию
Chiến tranh Việt Nam.Hoa Kỳ mất tổng 11800 máy bay các loại và 36 may bay B52. Một đất nước giàu có 🤔
Respect for the Vietnamese people. Won the war against the big americans.
@@simkecrni9492No they didn’t. They got slaughtered by the U.S. Military until we left, innocently expecting the North Vietnamese to follow the peace treaty they signed.
Us menang perang di Vietnam hanya dalam film saja, berbalik dengan kenyataan nya sangat memalukan 😁😁😁
Biasalah, film propaganda, kayak film Rambo
Chiến tranh Việt Nam.Hoa Kỳ mất tổng 11800 máy bay các loại và 36 may bay B52. Một đất nước giàu có 🤔
Sự thật
И в Афганистане просрали... Потому что оккупантов никто не любит. Единственное достижение что людей вы убили больше чем Гитлер... Но то такео... Походу ваше время пришло подыхать.
The A6 and A7 were bombers that surpassed any and all expatiations. I'm a former Kittyhawk Engineman, A-Gang and watched those two warbirds returned with many holes in them. This Movie I watched it when it first premiered and I was returned to those days on that Flat Top (1971-1973).
Weren’t they slow though ?
@@reubenblanco3021but that the meaning of bombers to fly low and slower than fighters
Bombing at that time was mainly done by regular ammunition
@@reubenblanco3021, sure they were buy not meant to be fast ..if it's slow, it can loiter
もうこの様に、危険を犯して戦場にパイロットが行く必要は無くなった。
これぐらいの作戦なら、将来、米国本土からoperateできるのでは？
昔、敵対する国の首脳をリングに集めて戦わせてみればという事が冗談の様に言われていたが、
ワシントン、北京、モスクワからのoperateにより戦争が遂行出来る様になれば
どうなるのだろうか？
Демократия в виде порабощения и убийства народов.
In reality America lost the War ....
My brother, bombardier/navigator in VA-196, U.S.S. Enterprise, was also "5-11" . He participated in the now largely forgotten February 1977 air operations against African Dictator Idi Amin, for the taking of American hostages, six months after the better remembered Israeli Entebbe raid...
Good stuff, thanks to him and your family!
@Pommy Pie Didn't say airstrikes, but were sailing of the Kenyan coast in case threats against US citizens came to fruition by Idiotamin.
@Pommy Pie The only information I ever found was on the Wikipedia page of the U.S.S. Enterprise ( Under Eight and Ninth Deployments) and some South African web site. Like I said, largely forgotten. I don`t think they actually bombed the Capital, more like show of force flyovers...
VA-196 "The Main Battery"!!!
Thank him for his service and courage to his country. 👍🇺🇸
Fun Fact: They filmed this on the Independence. All flight deck scenes, the Tomcats were in the hangar deck. All hangar scenes the Tomcats were moved to the flight deck.
ha! you made me think of the Ouija board with the aircraft Silhouette nuts and washers and the flight deck/hanger deck -- must have been quite an exercise !
Good movie! Was a Ejection Seat Mech in the Navy. Was in A7A 1972 Vietnam Cruise. 3 different A6 Squadrons later. A6 we always taught crew to eject thru the canopy. Especially with the Gru7 seat.
Жаль что катапультировались...
Miss hearing those JP-52s!! To Eagle,Rev,Billy and Prof...thanks.
The last scene when the jet trying to bomb the airfield, really reminds me of the scene when the X-wings trying to destroy the Death Star in Star Wars :) they all flew low, between the buildings and get fired from 4 directions, even their helmets assembled some familiar images, decoration with X-wings fighter helmet too :)
Yep, I thought the same, top gun meets star wars...
That instantly brought that to mind as well. 👊🏽😆
Same
except that we are the empire not the rebel xD
Except in reality Vietnam were the rebels and USA is the empire
Best lines:
"There's a gun down there 503" "How else we gonna find it?"
"You ever eject?" "Not my trip, I didn't like it! Keep on rolling the dice!"
Missed line:
"You hoodlum! You disobeyed orders again! I grounded you!" "Hey, I am on the ground!"
"Hey, I am on the ground" was great 😂
Mine was" Sandy I'll do it for you "
I love when they are briefing the flight surgeon about ejection procedures. "What do I say? " and the other guy is like "If you even say 'what' you'll be talking to your self, 'cause I'll be gone "
"Here we go, Doc! The most exciting thing you can do with your clothes on!"
На твоей улице будет играть музыка но ты ее не услышиш. Потому что ты станеш пылью. А Пыль на подоконнике не умеет слушать. Ухов нет.
@@RevBooseSounds cool as a kid. Would you really would you not care for someone who you worked with for years and saved each others lives?
It is cold and selfish to not care for someone who has no experience in a dangerous job, especially a friend.
Bay trên bầu trời Việt Nam không hề dễ dàng để toàn mạng quay về căn cứ
Thời hiện đại thì khác xa Mỹ bây giờ nó mạnh về trên ko r
Wow they made a movie about this plane??! When I first got to Whidbey and first saw these planes I thought they were funny looking with that nose thing sticking out…and were they loud!!! Touch and gos drove me NUTS but now I feel proud of the planes!
My Dad worked on the A6's and went wherever they went. He was on the USS Constellation (Connie). Korea & Vietnam.
We have old home movies (8mm) of living on Whidbey.
@@LAT-qk3vj My ex got the photo albums of living there 😏😏
Funny thing is for refueling midflight
That was my first Revell Kit 25 years ago, a gift from my dad coworker. Greetings from Brazil.
My friend was aboard a USN carrier on Yankee Station during the very busy actions of the Vietnam War. He was on the service crew of an A6. Apparently the A6 was a flying bundle of wires and electronics. He told me about the organized frenzy aboard ship when the ship went into action. Must've been similar to what the current aircraft naval personnel go through now.
Из лупары вьетнам завалил четырех чупачупсов за мильярд долларов
I can't even imagine how amazing a revamped version of this movie with today's filming technology would be
A-6 Intruder one of my all- time favourites right after the novel and the movie were released.
I could totally have seen Matthew Fox as Jake back when he was on Lost, but he's much too old for the role now. Josh Hartnett or Owain Yeoman might work.
That would be Bitchin'
@@crimzonr9371 Are you replying to me, or the other guy?
To the other person but great video
It would be too woke to watch
Бедные американские пилоты, щаЗ всплакну! А какого ляпа они делали в небе Вьетнама??? Их туда кто то звал???
Того же что и вы сейчас в Украине!
The movie is from Stephen Koontz book “flight of the intruder“. That book and the books that followed it up by Koontz are all fantastic books and are extremely realistic. My old law partner was a Navy carrier pilot who flew attack bombers (maybe the Intruder) and he recommended the book to me years ago. He said that reading the book it was so realistic that he started waking up in a cold sweat. Koontz is a great writer. The movie is a tad melodramatic at times but it is the great movie that it is in my opinion due to the acting of Willem Dafoe.
Its's actually Coonts, just so nobody confuses him for Dean Koontz. His novels went a bit like the Jack Ryan series but with Jake Grafton becoming his lead character. I think Tiger Cole was in another Jake Grafton novel.
@@shaider1982 Nobody combines military action and horror like Koontz-Coonts!
It’s so realistic because Stephen was an A-6 pilot during, and in, Vietnam. No better source for material.
Agree. One of my favorite books. Thought the movie was ok.
Coonts, Jake grafton series in order.
Flight of the intruder
The intruders
Final flight
The minotaur
All good books, series does continue have not read past the minotaur yet.
A movie of Final Flight should have been made as well as a number of Stephen Coonts novels about Jake Grafton. An amazing collection. Brad Johnson and Willem Dafoe were the perfect compliment to the book's characters...
Great movie, I was in an A6 intruder squadron VA 176 thunderbolts.
onboard Rosie?
And you lost that war.....like to guys defeated in Afghanistan
😮
😮
I REMEMBER ME AND MY FRIENDS THOUGHT OF GOING AND WATCH THIS NEWLYRELEASED ENGLISH MOVIE IN THIS PICTURE HALL CALLED "CHANAKYA". AT NEW DELHI. THE YEAR WAS 1991 AND ALL OF US 24 YEARS OLD.
SUDDENLY WE DECIEDED NOT TO WATCH THIS MOVIE AND WASTE OUR HARD EARNED MONEY.
WHEN WE ALL AS 7 - 10 YEARS OLD KIDS ( 1977-1979 )
HAD SEEN IN REALITY THROUGH PRINT MEDIA TV NEWS HOW THESE
SO CALLED........ OFFICERS , SOLDIERS, AIRMEN,, SAILORS 😂🤣😁😁😁🤣😂 OF 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, ARMY.AND NAVY..... COMPLETELY PALED FACES / YELLOW FACES ......... COWARDS 👌👌👌👌👌👍😉👏😁😁😂🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️
RUNNING FOR THEIR LIVES...... FLEEING SIAGON / VIETNAM FOR THEIR DEAR LIVES.
COMPLETELY " HILARIOUS". TO WATCH.
WE ALL INDIAN KID LOVED IT JUMPED WITH JOY WATCHING IT..... " LIVE".
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😁😁😁😁😁👏😉😉👍👌👌👌👌👌👌🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😁
RIP Brad Johnson saw him in person while this movie was filming, will always be remembered.
He died young..
The A-6 was a great airframe, time just caught up to them. Was an A-6 B/N, and the aircraft was great, but was showing its age in the 1980’s. Still, nothing has yet to show the capability of day/night all-weather bombing, especially from a carrier deck.
I would say that the a-7 and the f-111 had shown the capability of all weather bombing better than the a-6
@@antimedic4441 And you would be wrong. Flew the A-7 and the A-6. A-7 was mostly a VFR attack aircraft. There is a reason A-6 was never exported even to closest allies.
@@bobb.7899 a-7 also had a targeting pod with FLIR and could project this image to the hud for night flying, and you obviously didnt read about the F-111
@@antimedic4441 F-111 had the capability
@@bobb.7899 and was extremely good at it
Còn vài bộ xương phi công dưới hồ Tây đấy chưa tìm được đưa về với mẹ đâu cười đi.!
I saw this movie in the theaters when I was young. It was the Top Gun of it's time. Realistic, dramatic and entertaining at the same time. Five stars!
No... Top gun was the top gun of this time. This only came out 5 years after top gun and was a terrible rip off. A straight up money grab with a terrible script and even worse acting. I cringe even trying to watch it now. Thank God I never suffered through it before. At least Iron Eagle was acted decently.
@@seanriopel3132 everyone has a favourite movie, let the man have this
@@seanriopel3132 100%
@@ablacktemplar1971 if this is anyone's favorite movie they need to be taken out back a short in the head like in in that movie of mice and men. Seriously anyone who picked this over top gun is a crack head.
To me, this was far above Top Gun! Top Gun was a Hollywood, glamour shot. Flight scenes were great..Story, acting, and plot were just silly.
This was much more realistic. Better acting and much darker.. I've seen Top Gun once. This? 5-6 times (or more)
Glad they got the ejection right when the second plane was going down. On the ejection seat, there is a "window breaker" so that the pilot wouldn't slam his or her head into the canopy.
in actuality the canopy is not blown during ejection, the seats go thru it.
@@davidchirstopherson6523 by design? Every ejection?
Great Scene!
Bridges of Toro Ri and Flight of the Intruder were the best attack movies made. Sams and AAA and the occasional MiG made for exciting missions. Although I didn’t fly in Vietnam there were pilots in my A7 squadron that had. I would say there was a lot of frustration with DC as portrayed in the movie
Toko ri
@@j.w.matney8390 spelling never was my strong suit
My favorite Navy aircraft. I knew a veteran who flew these in Vietnamese Nam.
Bat 21
I'm glad this movie is finally getting the recognition is deserves.
This is a Bonehead movie HATED by the actors in it
It was really rare for only the A6's to go out during Vietnam. By the late 60's, most A6 sorties had some sort of fighter escort.
Dammit, it cut short before my favourite exchange in the movie!
Grafton gets over to Camparelli, who spits out his sucker stick and grunts, "Hoodlum! You're supposed to be grounded!" Grafton shoots back, "Hey, I *am* on the ground!" Always made me laugh, but no clips have it! 😞
The vietnam war was dirty war....only "busines"...invest your sons...their sons...
This was a great movie, loved it.
I REMEMBER ME AND MY FRIENDS THOUGHT OF GOING AND WATCH THIS NEWLYRELEASED ENGLISH MOVIE IN THIS PICTURE HALL CALLED "CHANAKYA". AT NEW DELHI. THE YEAR WAS 1991 AND ALL OF US 24 YEARS OLD.
SUDDENLY WE DECIEDED NOT TO WATCH THIS MOVIE AND WASTE OUR HARD EARNED MONEY.
WHEN WE ALL AS 7 - 10 YEARS OLD KIDS ( 1977-1979 )
HAD SEEN IN REALITY THROUGH PRINT MEDIA TV NEWS HOW THESE
SO CALLED........ OFFICERS , SOLDIERS, AIRMEN,, SAILORS 😂🤣😁😁😁🤣😂 OF 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, ARMY.AND NAVY..... COMPLETELY PALED FACES / YELLOW FACES ......... COWARDS 👌👌👌👌👌👍😉👏😁😁😂🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️
RUNNING FOR THEIR LIVES...... FLEEING SIAGON / VIETNAM FOR THEIR DEAR LIVES.
COMPLETELY " HILARIOUS". TO WATCH.
WE ALL INDIAN KID LOVED IT JUMPED WITH JOY WATCHING IT..... " LIVE".
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😁😁😁😁😁👏😉😉👍👌👌👌👌👌👌🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😁
One of my all time favorite war movies. And the book was awesome. Thank you.
I enjoyed the movie, I loved the book. It came out along with other well writen books (later movies) after "The Hunt For Red October", Red Storm Rising, etc. The mid & late 1980s had many good techno-drama books and movies.
RIP Brad Johnson
Was and still is my favorite jet.
Preet, difilm kau bisa tertawa, klw sekarang anak istri lu bakal nangis, tinggal nama di bawa pulang,, 🙏😄
Great movie! Thank you!
Pretty versatile platform. We were launching these off the Saratoga well into the '80's, although they were mostly Marine piloted.
I was a young sailor on Independence when this was made. The ship pulled out for 10 days(?) i think for the at-sea stuff. I was in Fallon on det for that.
I REMEMBER ME AND MY FRIENDS THOUGHT OF GOING AND WATCH THIS NEWLYRELEASED ENGLISH MOVIE IN THIS PICTURE HALL CALLED "CHANAKYA". AT NEW DELHI. THE YEAR WAS 1991 AND ALL OF US 24 YEARS OLD.
SUDDENLY WE DECIEDED NOT TO WATCH THIS MOVIE AND WASTE OUR HARD EARNED MONEY.
WHEN WE ALL AS 7 - 10 YEARS OLD KIDS ( 1977-1979 )
HAD SEEN IN REALITY THROUGH PRINT MEDIA TV NEWS HOW THESE
SO CALLED........ OFFICERS , SOLDIERS, AIRMEN,, SAILORS 😂🤣😁😁😁🤣😂 OF 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, ARMY.AND NAVY..... COMPLETELY PALED FACES / YELLOW FACES ......... COWARDS 👌👌👌👌👌👍😉👏😁😁😂🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️
RUNNING FOR THEIR LIVES...... FLEEING SIAGON / VIETNAM FOR THEIR DEAR LIVES.
COMPLETELY " HILARIOUS". TO WATCH.
WE ALL INDIAN KID LOVED IT JUMPED WITH JOY WATCHING IT..... " LIVE".
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😁😁😁😁😁👏😉😉👍👌👌👌👌👌👌🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😁
0:08 ah shit here we go again
The A-6 was one of the most advanced aircraft in the Vietnam war.....
Tien tien cua nuoc ban..nhung no la do rac ruoi voi chung toi..va van rot nhu thuong
I guess Elias survived
Gah, I love this movie
I'd say Platoon was the top movie .
i watched this movie as a child cause i wanted to be a fighter pilot
que bom
Did you make it.?
An A-6 is a bomber :p
Too old for this sheeeet. Well another good one is Bat-21
The problem with this movie is that bombing North Vietnam airfields was off limits for much of the war because there were Russian and Chinese working with the North Vietnamese and we were terrified that bombing those bases would bring Russia and China into the war. Obviously, they were already in the war.
But putting the North Vietnamese military bases off-limits, it allowed them to continue to intercept our aircraft on a daily basis.
I was a Marine infantry platoon commander in Vietnam 1968-69. People who have no idea what they are talking about criticized General Westmoreland for losing the war. But you want to know who really lost that war? Congress, the President, and the Secretary of Defense. They were the ones to places severe limitation on Westmoreland and then blamed him for losing.
I served 21 years in the Marine Corps with 3 years in combat. I will tell you the truth that the one and only way to win a war is to commit overwhelming forces in an aggressive campaign to end the war as quickly as possible by breaking the will of the enemy to continue fighting.
We should have learned from WW II that the only way to defeat the enemy is to defeat him on is homeland. In Vietnam, we played a war of attrition against North Vietnam without invading North Vietnam. There is a major truth in the history of modern warfare: air power alone cannot defeat the enemy. It's important, but it's not the critical factor. The only exception was dropping the atomic bombs on Japan to force them to surrender. In all other cases, it took boots on the ground to take enemy territory to win.
If we had invaded North Vietnam WW II style, it would have been a bloody mess, but we would have been quick and we would have lost fewer people than the 58,000 men and women killed in the Vietnam war and it would have only lasted a few months instead of 10 years.
Here's the problem we have. While it is important that civilian control is imposed on our military, politicians, the Secretaries of Defense and the services, and the President have no clue what it takes to win a war. They view it strictly from the prospective of staying in office.
You see WW II was very different. President Roosevelt called for the unconditional surrender of Japan and Germany and the Congress and people backed them up--and guess what, we won.
In the Korean War, Truman was unwilling to take General MacArthur's advice to use nuclear weapons to counter the thousand to one odds faced by US troops when the Chinese entered the war for North Korea. The result was we didn't win the war. War ended where it started at the 38th parallel. We lost the war because North Korea with Chinese and Russian prevented the North Koreans from losing. Technically, we are still in a state of war with North Korea that is now a nuclear threat to South Korea, Japan, and the US. Well done Truman. You took a war that we should have won and created a nuclear threat for today.
The same with Afghanistan. Secretary of Defense and Vice President Chaney wanted special forces riding on horseback to be the primary means of defeating the Taliban. So how did 20 years of using minimum forces turn out? With a humiliating withdrawal where we turned over 80 billion dollars of military equipment to the Taliban that will keep them ever stronger than before for decades to come. Of course, it didn't help that the Afghan President politicians, government, and military were totally corrupt.
In Ukraine, NATO obvious will not get directly involved because of the potential of nuclear war with Russia. But what if NATO had said that it was intervening on behalf of Ukraine and threatened nuclear war with Russia if Russia. Let's assume that the NATO threat was believable. Do you think Russia would destroy itself over Ukraine? It's true that Russia could launch thousands of nuclear missiles, but at what cost? Russia would also end up a glowing ember with no means of governance or supporting economy. Would they risk it?
And remember how Democrats mocked President Reagan's Star Wars missile defense initiative and how strongly they opposed it. What if we had initiated a robust missile defense program since 1980's, we might now have a robust missile defense of the US and the rest of NATO. But no, we lost decades of research and today we have a missile defense system that at most try to intercept several incoming missiles, but not the hundreds or thousands Russia can send today.
Bush wanted to put anti-ICBMs in Poland and other countries, but Obama canceled it. Trump wanted to put anti-ICBM systems into the Baltic countries, but Democrats opposed it and Biden killed it. So the question is why are Democrats so opposed to anti-ICBM defenses????
If Trump or DeSantis are elected in 2024, then the anti-ICBM missile systems will be back in the Baltic countries, and when the Democrats take control they will take them out.
You have to ask yourself, why do the Democrats want to make the US less safe from nuclear attack? They've been fighting it tooth and nail since the 1980's. Why?
Back to the Flight of the intruder. It's true that over a thousand US jets were shot down over North Vietnam. But that was because we didn't invade North Vietnamese the same way the North invaded the South.
If we had sent two or three Marine Divisions into North Vietnam, there wouldn't have been so many anti-aircraft missiles and guns. There wouldn't have been uninterrupted resupplies to the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army in the South. There would have been any capability of North Vietnam to sustain it's military.
One of the rules of war is to never allow you enemy to have a sanctuary where he can rest, rearm, train, and launch new attacks. That is exactly what we allowed in the Vietnam War.
Since when invading a country and throwing atomic bombs sounded so easy.
We’ll said…. It seems politics and profit was/is more important than lives… nothing has changed.
And yes we’d be doing better with Trump right now, in every category.
@@canconservative8976 yes with Trump still in power, Putin would never have invaded Ukraine, because Trump would have just rolled over and given it to him. It amazes me how American "conservatives" are so willing to roll over for Russia.
@@pandamonium7996 Trump met with Putin, and then fired 29 cruise missiles at a Russian airbase in Syria... Trump Cancelled the pipeline from Russia to Germany. Trump met with Xia in Mar Lago as his guest, Trump walked across the demarcation line in Korea with Kim... WAKE UP KID.
We enjoyed GLOBAL PEACE and CHEAP EVERYTHING (Gas and Goods) with TRUMP.
Facts destroy Liberal Globalists daily.
What a great writer up spot on. There's big money in these long extended wars for a click of people . Thankyou for your service
Cool plane but didn’t like the side by side seating look
Ever see an OV-1 Mohawk?
Sorry, I got bored and didn’t finish the clip. The 2 best jet movies I’ve ever seen were the The Hunters (Robert Mitchum) and Bridges of Tokyo Ri (William Holden).
I agree 💯 they're both of the best jet movies I ever seen and the flight of the intruder is also very good all these movies are very rare and realistic to the planes involved😊
I'll second the Bridges of Toko Ri.
@@pescatoralpursuit1726 ditto
They owe vietnam an apology
Loved that flick!
RIP, Tom Sizemore (Boxman)
"We never broke the faith, amigo!" 🇺🇲💪☠
Скажите название фильма пожалуйста
Русские и Вьетнамцы братья на век!
I like that Danny Glover was both a downed pilot in this, and a pilot rescuer in Bat 21.
The movie is an insult to the book.
great clip, a masterclass in how to blow their wings off, or just plain blow the cockpit off, great show. proves even the yanks go to god sometimes, it ain't all like top gun, with only one winner, everyone is even, esp. if they have the same tech.
When you're alone and life is making you lonely
You can always go
Downtown
When you've got worries all the noise and the hurry
Seems to help I know
Downtown
為什麼跳傘直接撞座艙蓋？
Top Vietnam War movie is abit of an understatement. We we're soldiers in the other hand now that is still The Vietnam War movie.
Very poor CGI in We Were Soldiers
@@AA-xo9uwwhat are you talking about? there was hardly any or little CGI.
They eject through the canopy?
Sampai 1000 film pun dunia tahu pemenang nya siapa 😂😂😂
👍🇧🇷.
This is still my favorite Navy movie of all time. Its as if i were watching a different crew from a different time period, during a wartime deployment! The book itself was great, and the movie was better, in my opinion. I can not say enuff about this movie! RIP Brad Johnson😥
Detective Murtaugh too old for this S***
Демократические бомбы...
Как называется фильм
This takes on a very different atmosphere now that Russian invaders are being shot down by lesser equipped Ukrainian soldiers fighting on their own ground. It brings to mind that Mitchell and Webb famous squit "are we the baddies?".... Were we the baddies?
I mean...the fact ukraine is now a corrupt us puppet government infested with nazis tells me the usa were always the bad guys.
Also the fact we were suppliying and funding the actual german nazis from the get-go up until april of 45.
And the fact the us supported coup of russia that led to the pos putin in power
Well there are quite a lot of people in the east who welcomed them, it's not as black and white as the funny Guy on TV wants to make believe
Не пизди
Yes.
Only movies have baddies. We often fought stupidly, tried to show off the size of our balls by using cannons on squirrels (which shows the opposite of balls), and also taught the world how to perform asymmetric warfare against us, which lessons they really took to heart (hopefully, per the Ukraine failure, that phenomenon where all you have to do is give asymmetric resisters high tech portable weapons, ultimately leads to world peace!)
But what we were doing here made a basic sort of sense. A flawed system, headed by short-sighted and unprincipled tyrants, had to keep expanding to continue hiding the fact that it wasn't working. We had to make it expensive to expand. We certainly did that. Ultimately, all defensive warfare has to consist of empowering local people to 1) make their own decisions as to what kind of political system they want, and 2) resist armed attempts from without to force a different political system on them. Our mistake in 'nam was that our guys did the fighting. The locals just cowered in their towns, waiting for it to be over.
Построй ген!
Купайся в звёздах!
God bless vietnam vet 🧡
This film should have been grafted with Bat21.
Fun fact: We didn't have Zsu-23-4 Shilka until after 1975.
А потом появилась Шилка мой друг;)
@@НаильСабитов-т3и Ха товарисг Я right :))
Actually when the jet flying low like that, the radar cant track the jet. We use AA for that not a misslle
I live in Washington State. Grumman A-6 Intruders were stationed at Naval Station Widbey Island. They flew lots of training missions in area. They had a distinct loud jet exhaust, when they went full throttle, they were quite loud. Hard to sneak up when you can hear them miles away.
Yeah! I loved 80s movie about flying such Final Countdown, Flight of Intruder, Firefox and Top Gun.
They forget to open the canopy before ejecting 3:35. When you are excited that can happen.
No, didn't forget. The initial ejection at the start of the clip is wrong (guess Hollywood needs...) but in the Intruder, the ejection took place through the canopy as seen in 3:35. That is the correct sequence. No need to manually open the canopy.
@@Yllod Proper way to eject was through the canopy. The ejection seat is made in such a way that the top of the seat will hit the plexiglass before the pilot's head does. Primary means of ejection is by the overhead handle which has a face curtain for protection. Second and third method is a lever on the right side of the seat and one at the front of the seat between the pilots legs. If the pilot tried to eject the canopy it could get stuck halfway due to damage & the pilot would have no way out. That heavy metal bar running across the front of the canopy would be an obstacle. The canopy slides on a set of rails & can be blown in an emergency but not advisable while in flight. Other aircraft of the time had clam shell style canopies (F-4, A-4, A-7) which would rip off the plane as soon as it got caught in the air stream. Also, when the engines stop turning you lose all hydraulics and any control of the plane, basically a falling brick. Main fuel tank (fuselage tank) is right behind the pilot & BN. Advisable to exit the bird ASAP.
Go through it!
The A-6 ejection seat goes through the glass
@@jameson1239 Not glass, plexiglass.
Waw itu sangat keren 👍👍👍👍, jiwa patriotisme tentaranya sangat luar biasa.
Год работал во Вьетнаме и очень уважаю этот свободный и трудолюбивый народ. После увиденного в музее и узнав от участников боев о страшных деяниях американской военщины , моё отношение к американской армии, как к фашистской Германии.
propaganda
More like Russian army, looting murdering raping war crimes
I love you from vietnam
Mỹ chỉ giỏi xỏ lá thôi bạn. Thua trận ở Việt Nam thảm bại. B52 sang Việt Nam bị hạ hàng loạt. Người Vn lấy xác B52 làm xong nồi chảo.
A6's don't "ditch" they make smoking holes in the ground.
Классные вьетнамские парни
Как названий фильм?
❤️🇻🇳🇷🇺
👍👍👍👍
“There’s a gun down there, 503”
“Well how else are we gonna find it?”
I forgot some of the little things that made this movie legendary.
I was an A-6 pilot from 1984 until 1992 and to be honest I found this movie embarrassing. I was so hoping for a movie that showed what an incredible aircraft it was. The best Vietnam movie IMHO, was "We Were Soldiers Once, And Young"
The Intruder was a revolutionary airframe. Nothing ever matched the versatility of it to this day! Thank you for keeping the commies at bay. I fk'ing hate fish eggs.
And yet...the US lost the war
We didn't lose we weren't aloud to win, there is a difference. A6's were made on Long Island New York, sweet jet, as long as they were flying there never hardly broke, sit them down, they turned to shit, leaks, electrical junk.... VMA332 AWA 1977 thru 81, while over seas we dropped more ordnance than any body else since Vietnam. Semper Fi.
@@marypalladino4499 "We didn't lose we weren't allowed to win, there is a difference."
The US couldn't win in Vietnam anymore than they could win in Afghanistan. You can drop on the bombs you want, but if the local government and military can never stand on its own you're pouring blood and money into a black hole.
@@marypalladino4499 Loser.
Hanoi called us to the peace talks in Paris, not the other way around. We won the war...
Then Congress stopped funding our presence off the coast of South Vietnam and the North marched into Saigon, knowing Congress would never allow us to intervene. It's called "actual history".
@@johngregory4801 So the congress deliberately made US lose/withdraw? Why would they do that? And if Hanoi called for the peace talks, why did the congress stop the funding?
1. Depois disto partiu Jesus para o outro lado do mar da Galiléia, também chamado de Tiberíades.
2. E seguia-o uma grande multidão, porque via os sinais que operava sobre os enfermos.
3. Subiu, pois, Jesus ao monte e sentou-se ali com seus discípulos.
4. Ora, a páscoa, a festa dos judeus, estava próxima.
5. Então Jesus, levantando os olhos, e vendo que uma grande multidão vinha ter com ele, disse a Filipe: Onde compraremos pão, para estes comerem?
6. Mas dizia isto para o experimentar; pois ele bem sabia o que ia fazer.
7. Respondeu-lhe Filipe: Duzentos denários de pão não lhes bastam, para que cada um receba um pouco.
8. Ao que lhe disse um dos seus discípulos, André, irmão de Simão Pedro:
9. Está aqui um rapaz que tem cinco pães de cevada e dois peixinhos; mas que é isto para tantos?
10. Disse Jesus: Fazei reclinar-se o povo. Ora, naquele lugar havia muita relva. Reclinaram-se aí, pois, os homens em número de quase cinco mil.
11. Jesus, então, tomou os pães e, havendo dado graças, repartiu-os pelos que estavam reclinados; e de igual modo os peixes, quanto eles queriam.
12. E quando estavam saciados, disse aos seus discípulos: Recolhei os pedaços que sobejaram, para que nada se perca.
13. Recolheram-nos, pois e encheram doze cestos de pedaços dos cinco pães de cevada, que sobejaram aos que haviam comido.
14. Vendo, pois, aqueles homens o sinal que Jesus operara, diziam: este é verdadeiramente o profeta que havia de vir ao mundo.
15. Percebendo, pois, Jesus que estavam prestes a vir e levá-lo à força para o fazerem rei, tornou a retirar-se para o monte, ele sozinho.
16. Ao cair da tarde, desceram os seus discípulos ao mar;
17. e, entrando num barco, atravessavam o mar em direção a Cafarnaum; enquanto isso, escurecera e Jesus ainda não tinha vindo ter com eles;
18. ademais, o mar se empolava, porque soprava forte vento.
19. Tendo, pois, remado uns vinte e cinco ou trinta estádios, viram a Jesus andando sobre o mar e aproximando-se do barco; e ficaram atemorizados.
20. Mas ele lhes disse: Sou eu; não temais.
21. Então eles de boa mente o receberam no barco; e logo o barco chegou à terra para onde iam.
22. No dia seguinte, a multidão que ficara no outro lado do mar, sabendo que não houvera ali senão um barquinho, e que Jesus não embarcara nele com seus discípulos, mas que estes tinham ido sós
23. contudo, outros barquinhos haviam chegado a Tiberíades para perto do lugar onde comeram o pão, havendo o Senhor dado graças;
24. quando, pois, viram que Jesus não estava ali nem os seus discípulos, entraram eles também nos barcos, e foram a Cafarnaum, em busca de Jesus.
25. E, achando-o no outro lado do mar, perguntaram-lhe: Rabi, quando chegaste aqui?
26. Respondeu-lhes Jesus: Em verdade, em verdade vos digo que me buscais, não porque vistes sinais, mas porque comestes do pão e vos saciastes.
27. Trabalhai, não pela comida que perece, mas pela comida que permanece para a vida eterna, a qual o Filho do homem vos dará; pois neste, Deus, o Pai, imprimiu o seu selo.
28. Pergutaram-lhe, pois: Que havemos de fazer para praticarmos as obras de Deus?
29. Jesus lhes respondeu: A obra de Deus é esta: Que creiais naquele que ele enviou.
30. Perguntaram-lhe, então: Que sinal, pois, fazes tu, para que o vejamos e te creiamos? Que operas tu?
31. Nossos pais comeram o maná no deserto, como está escrito: Do céu deu-lhes pão a comer.
32. Respondeu-lhes Jesus: Em verdade, em verdade vos digo: Não foi Moisés que vos deu o pão do céu; mas meu Pai vos dá o verdadeiro pão do céu.
33. Porque o pão de Deus é aquele que desce do céu e dá vida ao mundo.
34. Disseram-lhe, pois: Senhor, dá-nos sempre desse pão.
35. Declarou-lhes Jesus. Eu sou o pão da vida; aquele que vem a mim, de modo algum terá fome, e quem crê em mim jamais terá sede.
36. Mas como já vos disse, vós me tendes visto, e contudo não credes.
37. Todo o que o Pai me dá virá a mim; e o que vem a mim de maneira nenhuma o lançarei fora.
38. Porque eu desci do céu, não para fazer a minha vontade, mas a vontade daquele que me enviou.
39. E a vontade do que me enviou é esta: Que eu não perca nenhum de todos aqueles que me deu, mas que eu o ressuscite no último dia.
40. Porquanto esta é a vontade de meu Pai: Que todo aquele que vê o Filho e crê nele, tenha a vida eterna; e eu o ressuscitarei no último dia.
41. Murmuravam, pois, dele os judeus, porque dissera: Eu sou o pão que desceu do céu;
42. e perguntavam: Não é Jesus, o filho de José, cujo pai e mãe nós conhecemos? Como, pois, diz agora: Desci do céu?
43. Respondeu-lhes Jesus: Não murmureis entre vós.
44. Ninguém pode vir a mim, se o Pai que me enviou não o trouxer; e eu o ressuscitarei no último dia.
45. Está escrito nos profetas: E serão todos ensinados por Deus. Portanto todo aquele que do Pai ouviu e aprendeu vem a mim.
46. Não que alguém tenha visto o Pai, senão aquele que é vindo de Deus; só ele tem visto o Pai.
47. Em verdade, em verdade vos digo: Aquele que crê tem a vida eterna.
48. Eu sou o pão da vida.
49. Vossos pais comeram o maná no deserto e morreram.
50. Este é o pão que desce do céu, para que o que dele comer não morra.
51. Eu sou o pão vivo que desceu do céu; se alguém comer deste pão, viverá para sempre; e o pão que eu darei pela vida do mundo é a minha carne.
52. Disputavam, pois, os judeus entre si, dizendo: Como pode este dar-nos a sua carne a comer?
53. Disse-lhes Jesus: Em verdade, em verdade vos digo: Se não comerdes a carne do Filho do homem, e não beberdes o seu sangue, não tereis vida em vós mesmos.
54. Quem come a minha carne e bebe o meu sangue tem a vida eterna; e eu o ressuscitarei no último dia.
55. Porque a minha carne verdadeiramente é comida, e o meu sangue verdadeiramente é bebida.
56. Quem come a minha carne e bebe o meu sangue permanece em mim e eu nele.
57. Assim como o Pai, que vive, me enviou, e eu vivo pelo Pai, assim, quem de mim se alimenta, também viverá por mim.
58. Este é o pão que desceu do céu; não é como o caso de vossos pais, que comeram o maná e morreram; quem comer este pão viverá para sempre.
59. Estas coisas falou Jesus quando ensinava na sinagoga em Cafarnaum.
60. Muitos, pois, dos seus discípulos, ouvindo isto, disseram: Duro é este discurso; quem o pode ouvir?
61. Mas, sabendo Jesus em si mesmo que murmuravam disto os seus discípulos, disse-lhes: Isto vos escandaliza?
62. Que seria, pois, se vísseis subir o Filho do homem para onde primeiro estava?
63. O espírito é o que vivifica, a carne para nada aproveita; as palavras que eu vos tenho dito são espírito e são vida.
64. Mas há alguns de vós que não crêem. Pois Jesus sabia, desde o princípio, quem eram os que não criam, e quem era o que o havia de entregar.
65. E continuou: Por isso vos disse que ninguém pode vir a mim, se pelo Pai lhe não for concedido.
66. Por causa disso muitos dos seus discípulos voltaram para trás e não andaram mais com ele.
67. Perguntou então Jesus aos doze: Quereis vós também retirar-vos?
68. Respondeu-lhe Simão Pedro: Senhor, para quem iremos nós? Tu tens as palavras da vida eterna.
69. E nós já temos crido e bem sabemos que tu és o Santo de Deus.
70. Respondeu-lhes Jesus: Não vos escolhi a vós os doze? Contudo um de vós é o diabo.
71. Referia-se a Judas, filho de Simão Iscariotes; porque era ele o que o havia de entregar, sendo um dos doze.
(João, 6
..were is rambo in this time 😅
My God....that was entertaining!
คนดำขับเคลื่อน😅
Vietnam , red schit
Jet speed, not helicopter...why you got bullets.?
Excellent movie
I could have really admired Danny Glover for his role in this movie except for he's a total left-winger. I wonder why he agreed to act as a U.S. Navy 0-5 Commander Intruder light bomber pilot.
One of my favs. CRIMINALLY UNDERRATED!!! ✈️ 😉👍✌️
7:04 the BALLS it took to get that mission covered🤔😬 THE BALLS!!