200 T-72 vs 10 LEOPARD TANKS - TRASH vs QUALITY - IMPOSSIBLE?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 бер 2023
- Today we're experimenting with something fun and insane. We take the German 10 Leopard 2A4 vs 200 T-72. Yes, the ones that are going to be sent to Ukraine. Essentially, trash vs quality scenario. The ranges of engagement are 3000m. This epic cinematics will show, how much outdated quantity you will need to have, for it to become quality. Thankfully this game simulates tank armor pretty realistically, the thickness, penetration values, and different components like optics, etc.
That said if you enjoy epic short cinematic then don't forget to leave a LIKE! Combat Mission Shock Force 2
► Quality Playlist: • ARMY CONVOY AMBUSH - V...
►Become a Member: bit.ly/2Ztf7c9
►Follow WarfareGaming: / warfare11gaming
►Official Merch: shop.spreadshirt.com/warfareg... - Ігри
Please give a Like, and Subscribe if you're new! It helps a ton ♥
RAD!
Fix the title
I already did😁
K2 VS ZTZ 99 next please.
@@pyeitme508 😂cv
There's no way that a 200 outdated t72's lose against any 10 tanks of any sort.
Exactly. Even if the shells can't pen their armor, that doesn't mean that the Leopards can remain combat capable after couple of hits. And actual combat tests in various NATO armies did prove that the T-72 can penetrate any NATO tank when the proper ammunition is being used.
Leo 2 I’d bet on it lol
@@dominicviner6619 Bet with what? Most Leo 2 variants are just as "obsolete" as the T-72.
@@zaho87 one more thing the t72 uses a 125mm apfsds round, that's a decent round imagine a horde of tanks firing that, forget the apfsds what about the high explosive rounds. At the end of the day this simulation game is garbage and far from reality.
@@temong0long054 Not to mention the very high rate of fire per each T-72 compared to any Western tank.
Simulation is always far from reality
Lol not
@@wendelldig591 Intelligent of T72 tanker just 10%
I mean just throwing resources at your enemy is pretty Russian xD
@@guntimusprimer1999 russian apes attacking in mass not strategy
True, we didn't see any jack in the boxes here, small scratch and russian trash loses its turret (and after small example batch, all russian crews crap their pants and leave those "functional" recycle bins into field
I think the game did the T-72 a bit dirty. the leopards lower hull can not tank any apfads round and we seen multiple with hits there that where still going. I think realisticly even a 10 vs 100 would result in a win for the T-72. in different sircumstance maybe the Leopards could win yet in a frontline brawl I doubt so
To be clear, Poland tested Leo2A4 armour and stated that it was same level as on T-72M/A which is approximately 400mm of steel in the hull and turret, with the apfsds rounds aviable by that time(3bm42-Mango) 450-500mm pen on 2km or older ammo from 70s like 3Bm22 with 400-430 mm of pen at 2km,, static leo2 will be an easy target for the 72s, I'd say 13-17 T-72s on 10 Leo2 is just eought to minimize soviet losses.
But to be clear Leopards and Abramses would've faced a much better machine T-80U , main enemy of 72's rightfully were leo1 and M60(late modifications)
@@rinnarbetta866 una persona muy inteligente e informada, usted sabe lo que dice
@@rinnarbetta866 I think he used T-72 urals against leopard 2A4, if he used 10 T-72b3's against 10 Leopard 2A4, the T-72s would most definitely win.
In real life:
First High explosive 125mm, and Leo2 loses all optics.
T72 can't hit the target that distance
@@thokk8239 New T-72 have range even longer than Leo2 because of guided missiles fired right from the barrel
@@user-mg4pe4mg1iBut you Need to Spot the Target First the Leo is clearly Bettler at that
@@kerni9384 In the war we both mean tanks destroyed tanks only some times, most machines fell victims of other types of weapons, so i guess Leo2 will face the same
Russia kidd says ...
Странно, что Леопарды очередями не стреляли😀 как Калашников
Ахах
по факту один лео стоит 3-5 т 72 на поле боя, скоро все увидишь)
@@MultiRedkat ну подожду, видимо не долго осталось
@@user-tb6zr1bk5d летом все будет видно) 150 лео, 28 челенджеров и 31 абрамсов это официально.
@@MultiRedkat и че? Они очередями стрелять начнут?
I think in real-life, having 10 Leopard 2A4 tanks going up against 200 T-72s might be even harder than it looks. Those 10 Leopard 2A4 tanks could cause enough damage or destroy around 8-16 out of 200 T-72 tanks while stationary before the Leopard 2s get destroyed themselves. If all 10 Leopard 2A4s were maneuverable against 200 T-72 tanks, the number of casualties on the T-72s may increase somewhere between 18-32 or up to 40 depending on the skills of the tank crews and the level of armor penetration against those 1970s vintage Soviet-era tanks.
Думаю одновременный залп 125мм из 200 танков не оставили бы и пригорка на котором стояли леопарды
As the Soviet doctrines said - the quantity is a quality
No way!! 10 Leopard 2s beat hundreds of Russian T-72?? Woowww impressivee.. I bet there is not a single Leopard 2 wrecked in Ukraine battlefield, right? Please tell me this is true, because I'm running out of coccaine right now, so I need to hear some copium to keep the dopamine flow in my brain.
Господин Зеленский , леопарды и абрамсы беспощадно унечтожены. Более того два уже в Калугу увезли но это не афишируют.
Imagine the stamina of the Leopard loaders
Didn't even watch the vid yet but I can already guess the t-72s won
Doesn't matter that the leo is technologically superior, the sheer number of t-72s will outmatch them.
Maybe the Leos will be able to destroy half of them before they get overrun.
look whos mad
@@scrytox6981 he aint mad its just simple logic...
@@scrytox6981 why am I mad?
@@p_filippouz a ukrop, don't mind that idiot.
Lol, what? The Russians use T-72B3's, so a 10 vs 10 scenario, the T-72B3's will crush the Leopard 2A4.
Even if there is 200 t-72 it's impossible for just 10 leopards
To win
Without seeing the comments i already know that some people will be mad xD
I mean yeah. He claims theese tanks are being sent to ukraine while its a completely different version. Thats like comparing a Leo2 to a Leo2A7
@@iplaygames8090 it's a game
@@iplaygames8090 the german would never send their 2A7 in ukraine they send leopard 2A4 actually and 2A5 however today the russian use T72B3 which has the 3BM60 this ammunition can penetrate all leopard from 2A4 to 2A6 armor without any issues at 2000 m and more
А в реальности леопарды даже до позиций не доехали, лол
Leopard: IM INVINCIBLE
Some Syrian with an rpg: watch this mshallah
kurdish rebel with a kornet**
@@sheevpalpatine7588 me with spicy wings
Ждем следующую серию.-1 леоперд против 1000 т-72,нет 10 000.Мульт расчитан на 5 летнего хохлёнка?
Это симулятор игры, а не мультик. Хоть бы описание прочитал, прежде чем полит срач разводить
Ты читать оказывается умеешь?Крут
The T-72 is not trash....older but decent.
Remeber the version that the russians use the most, is the T-72B3... However, this version is almost eliminated.
The number wins...
Base t72s not even t72b (which are also outdated compared to the t72b3 which are being sent to ukraine)
This is like putting up a fight to 100 dudes with a knife to 1 dude with a pistol.
Paper stats are all nice and well, especially with 10+ difference in age.
Real life experience suggests that "incomparable difference in quality" actually doesn't matter much, be it Javelin ATGM or Lancet drone.
this like the battle for the Golem Heights during the 6 day war.
I remember seeing greatest tank battles episode on that. IDF may be small but there skill is amongst the best
be more realistic if the russian t-72's had washing machines on the top of the hull
to be more realistic, after the recent events, there shouldn't be as many as twenty really old tanks
И куски сала, от раздавленных салоедов.
ua-cam.com/video/cq223PiDMyY/v-deo.html автор канала не в курсе причины конфликта
And Nazi symbols on leopards
Everytime i see Videos like this, the Leopard 2s only standung around to give a good target. They have a high accuracity in movement, i think every Tank Crew would use this
You did the Russians dirty with the title
Yeah, I would say that the T-72 is a mediocre tank, not trash.
Truth hurts?
@@Mec__D Not really, no tank is perfect. Although T-72 tanks still can't compete with modern western designs.
In reality the hits on Leopards would have disabled them - damaged gun optics.
@@Mec__D depends on the model of t-72 and leopard. Leopard performed poorly in syria despite its name.
Ну если столько т 72 выстрелят по стоячим леопардам, то даже без пробития они останутся без оптики и пушки🤭😁
Ну , это да , особенно фугасом
@@nostromo4526 Это точно. Но даже обычными бронебойными или кумулитивными все посекает. Вот что происходит когда кумулем прилетает.
I'll bet the Ukrainian Leopard 2 crews are watching this. But I doubt if we'll see a Kursk like battle anytime soon (another big tank battle won't be without artillery and air support).
This simulation is not very representative. USSR shells "Svinets" from 1991 that can be used in oldest T72's are capable to penetrate front armor of leopard 2a4 from 2km. Most common and cheap shells "Mango" would show much worse results but there was plenty of shells made for penetration of modern and future targets of that time. Also to take out a tank you don't need to destroy it. HEAT from T62 will pretty much disable any modern tank from 1-2 shots. It would destroy all optics even protected with metal doors, will destroy all sensors and mounted equipment and with high chance lock turret rotation and other mechanisms. In right conditions when leopards 2a4's are used as they made for (defensive position protected by terrain) shooting from long distances using thermals, good optics and precise cannon they can hold rush of old tanks with low protection in double or triple amount. But if used in offence operation on flat surface they can be stopped by equivalent amount of old tanks that use terrain for defense. In this sim all tanks was on open area not protected by terrain. This means that first shot of 200 72's from 3km using HEAT would with high chance disable if not all then most of leopards. And leopards would have chance to make 1 - 2 shots before got taken out.
Oh, come on, let this child of gay conjunction play a little.
He can't win elsewhere but in ze game.
So he is trying to make his A, B, and C parents to be proud of him at least that way.
Don't you know, that flag of the Ukraine is the same as flag of Down syndrome?
Одновременный залп 125мм фугасов из 200 танков не оставили бы и горы на которой стоят леопарды
Even if you use 10 Leopard A6 instead of A4 variant, against 100 oldest basic version of T-72, there is no chance for them to win. Maybe max 50 would be destroyed before they would all be gonne. In this case 1 A4 can stand a chace to defeat 2-4 T72 depending on crew skills.
Imagine what happens in crew pants, when 200 high explosives hit them in first seconds. Ok not all of them will hit. After they get rid of HE (less chance to get tower off), and opics of enemy is cracked - its better to attack in line left and right directions, not front. Attacking in heap can harden the move, when tank in front is blown up. Can you make another video like that )
T-72 is trash? Really?
Their just don't like it 🙄
Haha people getting mad in the comments about pixels calling it unrealistic made me laugh so hard that i gave it a like 👍
By no means propaganda, it is only in Russia
We all know how long leopards actually last in a real war
Yea real world isint like hollywood numbers count 200 Ts would absolutely dominate 10 leopards
Heavily biased video
If those virtual Leo crew were serious, they would have postioned themselves at a better reverse slope spot.
The real battle report: 100+ T-72 Survived
Probably every nato’s tank can destroy a t-72 irl
I guess so, because original t-72 is old.
And probaly every T-72 can destroy every nato's tank irl
@@voe7939 bro are u seriously? 💀💀
There is no match between a leopard 2A6 and a T-72 B3
Хотите прикол. Т 72 тоже может уничтожить т 72😅
@@allessiobuonfiglio6702 a T72B3 can *easilly* destroy any Leopard 2 variant from the sides or rear where any tank is vulnerale.
Only the front armor is strong but that's not the only part of the tank that can be hit, the sides and rear can also be hit and this is where any tank can be destroyed
My decision is that the Leopards are massively over modeled. I could be wrong.
What modifications are we talking about? Leopard 1? Leopard 2? T-72B3?
I guess even 200 T-34 can win 10 Leopards 2, cuz they just will take over territory and will force Leopards to retreat. Or if we are talking about the fight, they will surround Leopards while Leopards will shoot. This is too fantastic scenario to take it seriously.
Гы гы гы, глупо
You should do a video about T-14 Armata vs Abrams X
Now let's see the 10 leopard tanks advancing towards 200 t-72 x)
Una verdadera pena que los operadores de Leopard supervivientes en primera instancia no hayan puesto reversa cuando notaron la disminución seria del parque de los cañones (cubriendo su retirada con los proyectiles restantes). " Un león puede aplastar a una hormiga sin problema, pero un enjambre puede acabar con toda la manada". 👍😀
Since when can a Leopard's hull tank APFSDS? I am really confused.
We're talking about ranges of 3000m here and less capable ammunition for the T-72.
@@warfare11gamingIs it the older version of the APFSDS?
@@nicm.z9868 clearcly 3BM15 or 3BM22, if those T72 where equipped with 3BM42/46 or 3BM60 they would have annihilated those leopard
Look at all those leopards burning in what used to be called 'Ukraine' 😂
Look at all the Russian tanks burning in the land of your beloved neighbour
Look at the Moskva burning at Snake Island.
Look at half the Black Sea Fleet burning in Sevastopol.
You're not being fair Ivan
@@arandomfinnin1941 it is normal for Russian equipment to burn. You forgot: it is all useless junk. But when so high tech "game changers" or "Wunderwaffen" burn, that is newsworthy. Remember armored assault punching through Russian lines? Neither do I.
@@BojanPeric-kq9etWho tf called it a Wunderwaffe😂u making shit up it’s just another TANK still ofc highly technical and Mobil with hood protection but without experienced group and thoroughfare ATGM’s or something similar to the side every tank gets destroyed
The important thing about the leopard losses are that 2/3 tanks got towed back and repaired + out of EVERY leopard 2 tank that got destroyed the crew came out of alive! Maybe they got killed awhile after they left the tank by shots but what matters is they got alive outside not like Russian tanks
@@MoreFromStreamerswho called it that? Western media. NATO equipment is so above anything Russians have and similar BS.
I like your change of story. In original story, Leo 2s supposed to smash Russian defense lines and make such blow to Russian army that it would be practically defeated and kicked out of Ukraine.
Regarding crews: you actually have no idea. Repeating assumptions is not comparable to facts.
What would be a more sensible number 10 against 30?
Seems like u didnt have the reactive armor on these T-72s that the Russians updated em with? Pretty sure they modernized alot of em
try 10 leopard 2 ,10 challenger 2 and 10 abrams vs 300 tanks T90A
300 T90A tanks would win easy
@@Thrashmetal2130 i have tested result it's not enough ammo for OTAN TANKS ^^
T90a win but I think he might make the other win
10 Leopard 2 vs 200 T-72…
Let’s do the math basically each Leopard 2 will only need to take out 20. Plus Leopard 2 crews won’t just sit out on top of a ridge line and engage enemy tanks in an open field.
What the 10 Leopards would do is use “Shoot n’ Scoot ambush” tactics. Basically they’ll make the enemy fight on their terms of engagement and not let the enemy use their superior numbers to their advantage.
What the Leopards will do once they have their targets picked out is catch the enemy in a crossfire by having 5 tanks fire from either side of the formation. Or the Leopards could pair up in 2 and engage the formation from 5 different directions at different intervals to make it appear to the enemy that they’re being engaged by a far larger force.
This game is beyond unrealistic
Believe it or not but it's also one of the most realistic strategy games that is even used by the British military
it was enough for this fight to happen again Leopard 2A7+ vs t-14 armata
This T-14 Armata? 😅 ua-cam.com/video/DeJzuo2TsfM/v-deo.html
comparar esto en un juego es ridiculo, aun asi gran video bro
That is a horrible misrepresentation of what would have happened. The T-72s would have quickly won. The model of T-72 shown in the video was the T-72A, which started entering service in large numbers during the same decade the Leopard 2 did. The T-72 is not only more maneuverable, but is also more than capable of penetrating the Leopard 2 with its gun. At the ranges that the two were engaging at during the majority of the video, whatever technological advantage the Leopard may have had would be meaningless because both sides could accurately hit each other. Calling the T-72 "trash" demonstrates a sever lack of understanding of its intended use. Tanks like the T-72 were meant to be used in mass assaults where their excellent mobility and respectable firepower could shine.
Anyone with half a brain knows if this was a real battle t72s will be going at full speed not firing unless they can hit the target so they can close the gap
is fake , not real
Here t72 have to go for marksman from longer distances...!
Now do weasels against em
combat mission shock force 2 with dlc........ 30 leopard 2A6 vs 250 T90A ....... i have tested and it's horrific (size of the map 5000 x 5000)
You can't critizise a tank it's was a wonder at its time just don't make these titles otherwise it will not be good for your channel
Simulator is always far from reality and that is seen completely in the Russian Ukranian war. Leopards got stuck in the mud because they're not designed for russian ground. Modernized T-72 is a fair battle against leopard 2a4.
Could youbMake a video of the battle of Aachen??? Please.
Noted
Tbh these tanks aren’t far apart a Leo 2 would be better for this title
Impossible that ours leopard tanks can survive this
Then what 20 Leopards can do?
Hitler thought the same 80 years ago looking at his Tiger tanks
And challenger 2?
T 72 IS underratet
The leopard 2 are Standing, the T 72 fire while driving
Next 10 New Abrams vs 200 T-90
Awesome work!!!!
good story for hollywood fiction
Да, да, да... И русские приехали на войну без ракет пускаемых через ствол, на 5км кстати. Вообще удивляюсь, почему Т-72 стреляют? Они же должны просто ехать...😂
bruh, i come back this video from Donetsk and say leopard 2 is trash.
eastern front in a nutshell
Also try it with upgrade Leos just to 2A5, 2A8 would be extremely unfair...
Единственно, что верно - это то, что леопарды стояли на месте и стреляли. Судя по схеме бронирования, леопард, это танк обороны, а вовсе не танк прорыва. А когда их обошли то всех сожгли .... это близко к реальности. Всё остальное из пальца высосано.
Т-72А 80-х годов? Серьезно?
Гугл в помощь бро
Россия потеряла на Украине 344 старинных Т-72. будь спокоен
And for you these leopard 2 were the new versions ?
Нет конечно. как и то что ни одного подбитого леопарда
Old vs newer then
leo has no chance, the Russians would shower them with guided missiles at a distance of 5 km from such an area
😮15? Victory leopard ?
trash is the one that has no auto loader,and tank doesnt work without a gunner,just like in WW2 times lol)
Esos son loa t72 originales no los modernizados verdad?
А чего не наоборот..10 Т-72 против 200 Леопардов.Леопарды практически не использовались в бою.По Педивикии пару разборок в Турции и в Сирии вроде.Танк-без слаженного экипажа просто кусок железа.В данном же видео одни пикселы стреляют по другим.Причем очередями,прям как из автомата Калашникова
Это что, Т-72А был? Хрена се вы противника поставили учитывая что бронирование ранней 72-ки хуже последующих модтфикаций по типу Т-72Б и т.д.
DO A UKRAINE ARMY VS SIREN HEAD BATTLE.
J'aime voir la racaille rouge dérouiller .
It seems like 200 t-34 85 vs 10 tigger2😂😂
pretty much
You don't say T72 version? T-72A of Red Army or T-72M of USSR export to Warsaw Pact and customers of Soviet Union. T72A have composite armor. T72M in real life ( East Germany army ) can strike AFSPDS of Leopard 2A shooting from 1500m.
T-72M1 and distances were 3000m when the firing started
For those saying this is unrealistic, we've actually got the real-world data with US M1A1 tanks winning against T-72's against 10 to 1 and 12 to 1 type odds with almost no loses. In reality, the situations is probably even further against the T-72's, since IRL in that situation , the Leopards would retreat to defilade between firing, which we know from several real world engagements absolutely wrecks Soviet era tanks.
@anjoanjinho8307 So the Iraqi T-72M's were somewhat equivalent to T-72A's. The T-72M1's were a bit better than that, and the "Lions of Baghdad" were actually a little bit more capable than T-72M1's. They weren't in fact less effective than the T-72M. Now, they weren't as well armored as T-72B's which by then were available in Russian service, and they did not have the then absolute best Russian AT shell. (On the other hand, the vast majority of the then in service USSR tank fleet was equivalent to what the Iraqi's had. Only the front line most elite units would have had better. B tier units at the time C tier reserve units would have been very much in the same situation. Which is why the Iraq War came as such a shock to the Russians, as they realized their vast numbers didn't really make that much of a difference.) Regardless, without knowing what sort of T-72's are in the simulation, it's probably not that unrealistic.
For those who can't take khokhol cock out of their throats, all these "real world data" were taken from American forces, who destroyed Saddam's tanks using aviation, and then started to bark about 1 to 10, 1 to 12, 1 to 100500 and so on.
This is not the victory you think it is, Iraq had export versions of the T-72, even worse than the T-72 Ural, and the Iraqis were using obsolete ammunition. Had the Americans fought Soviet-standard tanks in Iraq such as the T-72B or the T-80U, the M1A1's would have been wiped out.
One 2 t 72 enough to defeat the 10
😂😂😂 it's the author of the channel who blew his brains out! 😂😂😂
lol, they haven't a big gap between themselves. In reality 200 T-72 smash Leo2A4 in a few minutes. The question should be 200 T-72 vs 125 Leo 2A4, who will win
Leopard can't take that much shot from 125 mm gun for sure
Précisez le modèle de T72, si c est des "M" c est de la merde ils n ont aucune chance.
Si par contre c est des T72B3M c est les Léo qui vont déguster : le canon est plus puissant et les briques réactives Relikt diminuent de 50 pour cent la pénétration des obus de 120
nice nice nice
make a battle of attu
So unrealistisch spätestens beim zweiten oder dritten Treffer an der selben Stelle wäre Schluss . Zweitens Nutz man die Deckung vom ab geschossenen Kollegen Kollegen zen oder paar mehr Panzer Opfern um eine Stahlwand zu haben wo aus der Deckung die leos bekämpft werden . Drittens während frontal Speer Feuer gegeben wird flankieren zwei Truppen den Gegner von zwei Seiten spätestens da ist fertig.😂😂😂
After taking 50% losses, the T-72 forces would have retreated and at 60% they would have mutinied and killed their commander
Real Russian Army would have just ran into a minefield and lost all tanks, like they did in Vuhledar.
Yeah like the Ukranians retreating from Krasnahora stepping on their own minefield
@@philipandrewdesuyo9676 perhaps, how many times did Russia attempt to attack Vuhledar? I seem to recall they lost 130 tanks and fighting vehicles doing the same over and over again over weeks.
@@robertnelson4460 That's according to ukrainian propaganda, irl, they lost 26 tanks in Vuhledar and probably 40 armored vehicles in 2 weeks, the Russians retrieved many of those vehicles to be repaired as they mostly just lost their treads to mines which could easily be fixed.
Bro, we are watching this over screen, its not real life..