Filter simulation - QUCS Studio

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @abc_123_handle
    @abc_123_handle 2 місяці тому +29

    QUCS series ? Yes please !

  • @roncarlson8535
    @roncarlson8535 2 місяці тому +11

    Some tutorial videos would be great, QUCS is so extensive some vids could speed up the learning curve! Thanks for all your work, much appreciated.

  • @kramer3d
    @kramer3d 2 місяці тому +3

    i would very much appreciate a qucsstudio series!!!!

  • @MegaCadr
    @MegaCadr 2 місяці тому +5

    Weird. I was looking through the rfengineering subreddit last night, and someone had a cool thing they designed in this. I though I should look into it, and this morning there is this. Thanks!

  • @epleace
    @epleace 2 місяці тому +6

    Very impressive. Thanks for all the work and time you put into these videos.

  • @MattHeere
    @MattHeere 2 місяці тому +6

    I have LTSpice, QUCS, Elsie, and SimNEC all in my stable for filter work. There's a lot of overlap in functionality, but there's always something that one of them does better than another. The hardest part is getting proficient enough in all of them to make good choices about what to use when. I'd probably do better just to pick one and really become an expert in it.

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  2 місяці тому +4

      This is also a big issue for me.. There is a lot of good software out there, but mastering any specific one takes a very long time...

  • @ghlscitel6714
    @ghlscitel6714 2 місяці тому +4

    This QUICS is a great find. Thanks for sharing.

  • @stronggers
    @stronggers 2 місяці тому +1

    QUCS series for the win!

  • @tomyorados974
    @tomyorados974 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for having my favorite sim tool. I think QucsStudio is the most advanced iteration of the Qucs family. Sadly no open source.

  • @hedleyfurio
    @hedleyfurio 2 місяці тому +3

    another excellent presentation - many thanks 👌

  • @andrewmcfarland57
    @andrewmcfarland57 2 місяці тому +3

    Thanks for the new tool!🙂

  • @daveevans9809
    @daveevans9809 2 місяці тому +7

    Series yes please

  • @danielkohwalter5481
    @danielkohwalter5481 2 місяці тому +2

    YES! QUCS tutorials, YES! I use linux and using Wine to run Ltspice sucks. QUCS seems to be a good alternative to run some intermediate simulations that are too much to run on online simulators.

  • @andres-hurtado-lopez
    @andres-hurtado-lopez 2 місяці тому +3

    QUCS studio series please, pretty please 😊

  • @hinz1
    @hinz1 2 місяці тому

    Just played a bit with qucs-s, is there any posibility to get phase vs frequency bode type plot as well?

  • @leinadshAlpha
    @leinadshAlpha 2 місяці тому

    Great! I would like to learn nore about this simulator. Do you think I can use it to calculate the inductance of a PCB path? Given geometric parameters?

  • @opilarczyk
    @opilarczyk 2 місяці тому +2

    Have you SimNEC? Feel like it would be a big help in your videos whenever you have to match some impedances.

    • @opilarczyk
      @opilarczyk 2 місяці тому

      Obviously "have you seen" is what I meant to say.

  • @lucasandersen1505
    @lucasandersen1505 6 днів тому

    What tools do you recommend when you want to separately specify input and output impedance for your filter? I’ve come across many times now needing to design a LPF that also functions as a matching network at the same time. Do you know of any tools other than just doing it yourself in SPICE where you can specify complex input and output impedances while also a cutoff frequency, roll-off, etc? It seems like some sort of optimization tool would be needed for this to balance achieving the matching with the desired frequency response but I’m not aware of any tools that can do this

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  6 днів тому +1

      Most often when you do find filter calculators with different input and output impedance values, usually its just a real impedance; complex impedance brings the issue that the complex part isn't really constant - the real impedance you can keep fixed though. I would suggest to first try and compensate the imaginary part of your complex impedance, as much as possible in the frequency range of interest, and then try to calculate a real-only impedance filter. By combining the 2 elements some components might be eliminated - like 2 series or 2 parallel reactive elements. I'm not sure of the exact frequency range in which you need to work, but I did share some of the tools I found throughout the filter series.

    • @lucasandersen1505
      @lucasandersen1505 5 днів тому

      @@FesZElectronicsthanks for getting back to me and good point! I’m working in the 11-14MHz range. The amplifier I work with has a complex source impedance which makes this all very tricky to operate over a 3MHz range and I still have not happened upon what I believe is the ideal solution. Thanks for all the great content

  • @xfxox
    @xfxox 2 місяці тому +6

    Qucs development is freezed, there is a well updated fork: "Qucs-S"

  • @TelstarElectronics
    @TelstarElectronics 2 місяці тому

    What is the frequency range of that tool?

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  2 місяці тому +1

      I'm not sure there is a limitation. All the circuit calculations should be possible to be scaled.

  • @adelbouguerra8361
    @adelbouguerra8361 2 місяці тому

    Can you please do a video on a close loop buck converter in lt spice with both CCM and dcm also in an analog loop. A series will be interesting😅

  • @davedm6345
    @davedm6345 2 місяці тому

    Hi new sub, im interested on how isolate batteries, lithium or cellphone-chargers, to avoid us from static charges or magnetic fields from. Thanks!