When and how to use the Multiplier IP core

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @cheneymx
    @cheneymx 2 місяці тому

    this video helped me quite a lot. Thx!

  • @HarpreetBhatia7
    @HarpreetBhatia7 2 роки тому +6

    Glad you are back!

  • @robertkent2809
    @robertkent2809 Рік тому +4

    I think I have come across this problem before. When you slice "window_out", the result is interpreted as unsigned, and signed x unsigned multiplication is interpreted as unsigned. My solution to this was something like "mic_data*$signed(window_out[0:-WINDOW_FRAC]);" This has worked for me in the past.

    • @zamanizambri832
      @zamanizambri832 Рік тому +1

      This is correct. If you slice one of the multiplicands you need to type cast it. I originally thought this was a Vivado synthesis issue, but I believe this is true even for Synplify/ProtoCompiler.

    • @grantyale
      @grantyale Місяць тому

      Yup. This should be pinned.

  • @susmitamaloji7111
    @susmitamaloji7111 20 днів тому

    Where can we get that first code, you have shown in the starting of the code, plz reply me

  • @nitilpoddar
    @nitilpoddar 2 роки тому +1

    Hey Stacey!
    Could you tell me how can I understand this wizardry. This all looks absolutely bonkers. But I wish to learn.

  • @andyashton7061
    @andyashton7061 6 місяців тому

    Is the ability to have multiple block diagrams in one project a new feature in 2021.1? I am using 2020.1. Thanks for the videos, they're great!

  • @MrVerilog
    @MrVerilog 2 роки тому +1

    Nice short useful video

  • @ahll2006
    @ahll2006 Рік тому

    Hi,
    With the DSP48E1, I can multiply 23-bit signed and
    18-bit signed values
    Now I have a 23-bit unsigned value and my 18-bit
    value is unsigned (just like a 19-bit signed with
    only positive values)
    Is it possible to configure the DSP slice
    accordingly?
    If not, is there an elegant way to pre-process the
    multiplicands or post-process the product in order
    to arrive at the correct result?
    Thanks!

    • @FPGAsforBeginners
      @FPGAsforBeginners  Рік тому

      You should be able to use the same resources for signed or unsigned. I recommend using the multiplier IP core to try out your configuration and see what resources it shows. Usually one of the tabs will allow you to choose to use a DSP slice, and how many your multiplication will use up.

    • @ahll2006
      @ahll2006 Рік тому

      @@FPGAsforBeginners After a few days of trying out all the options, I came out to this conclusion which is DSP 18-bit signed only or 17-bit unsigned. walk around by doing what this thread says. support.xilinx.com/s/question/0D52E00006iHjc5SAC/dsp48e-multiplication-of-25-bit-signed-and-18-bit-unsigned-value-possible?language=en_US

  • @ekbhatnagar
    @ekbhatnagar 2 роки тому +1

    Good videos, very helpful. I started to work in the field as a freshers last month. Please do tell if you need my help in any videos. Help for you, knowledge for me😅

  • @russianultraviolet4441
    @russianultraviolet4441 2 роки тому

    Hm. I am suspecting the same problem with a code i am writing. Got a lot of multiplications and divisions of signed numbers in an equation and the result comes out wrong. I tried to avoid core ip as much as i can to make things simpler.... Thanks for the hint.

  • @siddhantiiitd9523
    @siddhantiiitd9523 2 роки тому

    After Installing vivado 2019.1 on ubuntu, I have to set up the license and when I go to help>manage license in vivado and then in manage license search paths, I get "Linux users will need to make these settings outside of this application" and I can't edit the license.
    Can you please help me resolve the issue

    • @FPGAsforBeginners
      @FPGAsforBeginners  2 роки тому

      You probably need to edit one of your environment variables in your bashrc. XILINXD_LICENSE_FILE or LM_LICENSE_FILE usually/